Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 19 of 19
2020-12-09 [p.397]
Q-200 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to the government’s capital expenditures on drinking water and wastewater infrastructure on reserve, and Indigenous Services Canada and its predecessors' expenditures on maintenance and operations for drinking water and wastewater infrastructure on reserve: (a) what amount has been allocated, broken down by program and by year (and, where applicable, by region), over the last five years; (b) what amount has been spent, broken down by program and by year (and, where applicable, by region), over the last five years; (c) over the past five years, how many boil water advisories have been active month to month; (d) over the past five years, which reserves have had water and wastewater infrastructure upgraded or built and what were they; (e) what are the companies that have received contracts to do the water and wastewater work on reserves; (f) where there any issues or problems in terms of fulfilling the contract and, if so, what were they; (g) out of the reserves that have had water and wastewater infrastructure built or repaired in the past five years, how many of them have had water issues, either with infrastructure or other issues, that resulted in renewed boil water advisories; (h) if so, which reserves, when did it occur and how long have they lasted; and (i) how long, according to the budgetary expectations, will it take to complete the government's promise to eliminate boil water advisories on First Nations reserves, based on the current level of funding? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-432-200.
2020-11-16 [p.268]
Q-91 — Mr. Melillo (Kenora) — With regard to the government’s commitment to end all long-term drinking water advisories by March 2021: (a) does the government still commit to ending all long-term drinking water advisories by March 2021, and if not, what is the new target date; (b) which communities are currently subject to a long-term drinking water advisory; (c) of the communities in (b), which ones are expected to still have a drinking water advisory as of March 1, 2021; (d) for each community in (b), when are they expected to have safe drinking water; and (e) for each community in (b), what are the specific reasons why the construction or other measures to restore safe drinking water to the community have been delayed or not completed to date? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-432-91.
2019-07-17 [p.5746]
— Nos. 421-04090, 421-04518 and 421-04671 concerning drinking water. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-46-07;
2019-06-19 [p.5706]
— by Mr. Ouellette (Winnipeg Centre), one concerning drinking water (No. 421-04671);
2019-06-18 [p.5679]
— by Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), one concerning drinking water (No. 421-04518) and one concerning discrimination (No. 421-04519);
2019-06-03 [p.5410]
— by Ms. Mihychuk (Kildonan—St. Paul), one concerning drinking water (No. 421-04090) and two concerning Canadian heritage (Nos. 421-04091 and 421-04092);
2018-03-20 [p.2773]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:
— No. 421-02026 concerning drinking water. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-46-05;
2018-02-05 [p.2649]
— by Mr. Ouellette (Winnipeg Centre), one concerning drinking water (No. 421-02026);
2018-01-29 [p.2588]
— No. 421-01905 concerning drinking water. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-46-04;
2018-01-29 [p.2618]
Q-1429 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With respect to Health Canada’s Drinking Water Safety Program, Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada (INAC) capital expenditures on drinking water and wastewater infrastructure on reserve, and INAC expenditures on maintenance and operations for drinking water and wastewater infrastructure on reserve: (a) what amount has been allocated, broken down by program and by year (and, where applicable, by region), over the last ten years; (b) what amount has been spent, broken down by program and by year (and, where applicable, by region), over the last ten years; and (c) why, in applicable instances, were allocated funds left unspent or transferred away from the originally intended line item? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1429.
2017-11-27 [p.2433]
— by Mr. Ouellette (Winnipeg Centre), one concerning drinking water (No. 421-01905).
2016-06-03 [p.547]
— Nos. 421-00201 and 421-00202 concerning drinking water. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-46-01;
2016-04-22 [p.379]
— by Mr. Rusnak (Thunder Bay—Rainy River), two concerning drinking water (Nos. 421-00201 and 421-00202);
2016-03-11 [p.262]
Q-42 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With respect to water and wastewater systems in Indigenous communities across Canada: (a) what is the breakdown of water systems by (i) high overall risk, (ii) medium overall risk, (iii) low overall risk; (b) how many Indigenous communities had drinking water tanks and cisterns fail safety tests; (c) how many Indigenous communities had drinking water tanks and cisterns which received a one hundred percent pass rate on safety tests; (d) how many homes are reported to have no water service; (e) how many communities are currently under boil-water advisories; (f) of the communities in (e), what kind of advisory is in place and what are the names of the specific communities; (g) what is the breakdown of wastewater systems broken down by (i) high overall risk, (ii) medium overall risk, (iii) low overall risk; (h) how many Indigenous communities had wastewater systems fail safety tests; (i) how many Indigenous communities had wastewater systems get a one hundred percent pass rate on safety tests; (j) how many homes are reported to have no wastewater service; (k) how much money has the government spent on sending bottled water into Indigenous communities that are under boil-water advisories; (l) how many bottles of water has the government sent to Indigenous communities; (m) how much funding is required to end every boil-water advisory currently in place over the next five years; (n) how much funding is required to have all water and wastewater systems receive passing grades; (o) how much money is dedicated within the current budget and the current fiscal framework to improve water and wastewater systems on reserves; (p) with respect to the National Assessment of First Nations Water and Wastewater Systems National Roll-up Report, (i) how much of the estimated 783 million dollars was spent and is projected to be spent on water systems, (ii) how much of the estimated 300 million dollars was spent and is projected to be spent on wastewater systems, (iii) how much of the 4.7 billion dollars was spent and is projected to be spent over the next ten years; and (q) for each subsection in (p), what are the updated costs and needs for funding on water and wastewater systems? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-42.
2013-05-30 [p.3225]
Mr. Warkentin (Peace River), from the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development, presented the Seventh Report of the Committee (Bill S-8, An Act respecting the safety of drinking water on First Nation lands, with amendments). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-411-247.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 73 to 76) was tabled.
2012-06-19 [p.1860]
Pursuant to Standing Order 69(2), on motion of Mrs. Aglukkaq (Minister of Health) for Mr. Duncan (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), Bill S-8, An Act respecting the safety of drinking water on First Nation lands, was read the first time and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2012-01-30 [p.687]
Q-228 — Mr. Casey (Charlottetown) — With respect to the new federal regulations on water treatment systems, issued by Environment Canada, to be implemented in November 2011: (a) what is the estimated cost, separately, for each municipality and province affected by the need to upgrade infrastructure to meet the new requirements; and (b) how much funding has been committed by the federal government to help contribute to the upgrades in the jurisdictions of (i) St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, (ii) Halifax, Nova Scotia, (iii) Montreal, Québec, (iv) Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, (v) Victoria, British Columbia, (vi) Vancouver, British Columbia, (vii) Sydney, Nova Scotia, (viii) Saint John, New Brunswick, (ix) Thunder Bay, Ontario, (x) Gander, Newfoundland and Labrador, (xi) Ottawa, Ontario? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-228.
2012-01-30 [p.687]
Q-229 — Mr. Casey (Charlottetown) — With respect to the new federal regulations on tolerance of fecal matter in areas where shellfish are, as issued by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans: (a) what is the estimated cost, separately, for each municipality and province affected by the need to upgrade infrastructure to address the new requirements; (b) how much funding has been committed by the federal government to help contribute to the upgrades in the jurisdictions of (i) St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, (ii) Halifax, Nova Scotia, (iii) Montreal, Québec, (iv) Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, (v) Victoria, British Columbia, (vi) Vancouver, British Columbia, (vii) Sydney, Nova Scotia, (viii) Saint John, New Brunswick, (ix) Thunder Bay, Ontario, (x) Gander, Newfoundland and Labrador, (xi) Ottawa, Ontario; (c) how many times since the new federal regulations took effect have the fishing areas in the above-mentioned jurisdictions been shut down due to fecal matter contamination exceeding the acceptable limits; and (d) what is the estimated economic impact on local fishers of the new federal regulations in the jurisdictions of (i) St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, (ii) Halifax, Nova Scotia, (iii) Montreal, Québec, (iv) Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, (v) Victoria, British Columbia, (vi) Vancouver, British Columbia, (vii) Sydney, Nova Scotia, (viii) Saint John, New Brunswick, (ix) Thunder Bay, Ontario, (x) Gander, Newfoundland and Labrador, (xi) Ottawa, Ontario? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-229.
2009-09-14 [p.717]
Q-263 — Mr. Scarpaleggia (Lac-Saint-Louis) — With regard to the environmental industries sector in Canada: (a) what were the sales of water and waste-water treatment firms for the five most recent years; (b) what proportion of these sales were for equipment and systems as opposed to services; (c) what were the sales for the environmental industries as a whole in the same years; (d) what proportion of the water sector's sales were export sales in each of the years in question; and (e) what proportion of these export sales were for equipment and systems as opposed to services? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-263.
Results: 1 - 19 of 19

Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data