Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 28 of 28
2019-05-03 [p.5232]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Graham (Laurentides—Labelle), seconded by Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre), Bill C-445, An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act (management and direction of the Parliamentary Protective Service), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2018-11-28 [p.4366]
The Speaker laid upon the Table, — Document entitled "Designation of premises or parts of premises for the purposes of the definition “Parliament Precinct” in section 79.51 of the Parliament of Canada Act". — Sessional Paper No. 8527-421-44.
2017-06-19 [p.1995]
Mr. Bagnell (Yukon), from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the 34th Report of the Committee, "Question of Privilege Regarding the Free Movement of Members of Parliament within the Parliamentary Precinct". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-256.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 56 to 58, 60, 61, 63 and 65) was tabled.
2017-06-15 [p.1967]
The Speaker laid upon the Table, — Document entitled "Extension of the "Parliamentary Precinct" in section 79.51 of the Parliamentary of Canada Act for the purposes of the celebration of Canada's day, from June 30, 2017, at 8:00 a.m. to July 2, 2017, 11:59 p.m.". — Sessional Paper No. 8527-421-19.
2017-04-06 [p.1590]
A question of privilege having been raised by Ms. Raitt (Milton), the Speaker ruled that there was a prima facie case of privilege;
Whereupon, Ms. Raitt (Milton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), moved, — That the question of privilege regarding the free movement of Members of Parliament within the Parliamentary Precinct raised on Wednesday, March 22, 2017, be referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.
Debate arose thereon.
2017-04-06 [p.1591]
Mr. Bernier (Beauce), seconded by Mr. MacKenzie (Oxford), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by adding the following:
“and that the Committee make this matter a priority over all other business including its review of the Standing Orders and Procedure of the House and its committees.”.
Debate arose thereon.
2017-04-06 [p.1591]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Raitt (Milton), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot);
And of the amendment of Mr. Bernier (Beauce), seconded by Mr. MacKenzie (Oxford).
The debate continued.
2015-03-26 [p.2289]
Mr. Preston (Elgin—Middlesex—London), from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the 34th Report of the Committee (question of privilege regarding the free movement of Members within the Parliamentary Precinct). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-412-197.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 50 to 52, 54, 66, 68, 70, 72 and 74) was tabled.
2015-02-16 [p.2122]
Pursuant to Standing Order 57, Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Duncan (Minister of State), moved, — That, in relation to the consideration of Government Business No. 14, the debate not be further adjourned.
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the closure motion.
2015-02-16 [p.2122]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 330 -- Vote no 330) - View vote details.
YEAS: 132, NAYS: 96
2015-02-16 [p.2123]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Duncan (Minister of State), seconded by Mrs. Aglukkaq (Minister of the Environment, Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency and Minister for the Arctic Council), — That this House, following the terrorist attack of October 22, 2014, recognize the necessity of fully integrated security throughout the Parliamentary precinct and the grounds of Parliament Hill, as recommended by the Auditor General in his 2012 report and as exists in other peer legislatures; and call on the Speaker, in coordination with his counterpart in the Senate, to invite, without delay, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to lead operational security throughout the Parliamentary precinct and the grounds of Parliament Hill, while respecting the privileges, immunities and powers of the respective Houses, and ensuring the continued employment of our existing and respected Parliamentary Security staff; (Government Business No. 14)
And of the amendment of Ms. Turmel (Hull—Aylmer), seconded by Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), — That the motion be amended by deleting all of the words after the word “House” and substituting the following:
“recognize the necessity of fully integrated security throughout the Parliamentary precinct and the grounds of Parliament Hill, as recommended by the Auditor General in his 2012 report and as exists in other peer legislatures; and call on the Speaker, in coordination with his counterpart in the Senate, to prepare and execute, without delay, plans to fully integrate the work of all partners providing operational security throughout the Parliamentary precinct and the grounds of Parliament Hill, while respecting the privileges, immunities and powers of the respective Houses, including the ultimate authority of the Speakers of the Senate and House of Commons over access and security of Parliament and ensuring the continued employment of our existing and respected Parliamentary Security staff, whose exemplary work on October 22, 2014, quickly brought an end to the security threat on Parliament Hill.”.
The debate continued.
2015-02-16 [p.2124]
Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), moved the following subamendment, — That the amendment be amended:
(a) by adding after the words “fully integrate” the words “by way of a contractual agreement with the House of Commons and the Senate”;
(b) by deleting the words “while respecting” and substituting the following “and through which an integrated security body would report to the Speakers of the two Houses so as to respect the division of powers between the executive and the legislature, parliamentary supremacy and”.
Debate arose thereon.
2015-02-16 [p.2124]
The question was put on the subamendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 331 -- Vote no 331) - View vote details.
YEAS: 106, NAYS: 138
2015-02-16 [p.2125]
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 332 -- Vote no 332) - View vote details.
YEAS: 83, NAYS: 161
2015-02-16 [p.2127]
The question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 333 -- Vote no 333) - View vote details.
YEAS: 138, NAYS: 82
2015-02-06 [p.2113]
Mr. Duncan (Minister of State), seconded by Mrs. Aglukkaq (Minister of the Environment, Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency and Minister for the Arctic Council), moved, — That this House, following the terrorist attack of October 22, 2014, recognize the necessity of fully integrated security throughout the Parliamentary precinct and the grounds of Parliament Hill, as recommended by the Auditor General in his 2012 report and as exists in other peer legislatures; and call on the Speaker, in coordination with his counterpart in the Senate, to invite, without delay, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to lead operational security throughout the Parliamentary precinct and the grounds of Parliament Hill, while respecting the privileges, immunities and powers of the respective Houses, and ensuring the continued employment of our existing and respected Parliamentary Security staff. (Government Business No. 14)
Debate arose thereon.
2015-02-06 [p.2113]
Ms. Turmel (Hull—Aylmer), seconded by Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all of the words after the word “House” and substituting the following:
“recognize the necessity of fully integrated security throughout the Parliamentary precinct and the grounds of Parliament Hill, as recommended by the Auditor General in his 2012 report and as exists in other peer legislatures; and call on the Speaker, in coordination with his counterpart in the Senate, to prepare and execute, without delay, plans to fully integrate the work of all partners providing operational security throughout the Parliamentary precinct and the grounds of Parliament Hill, while respecting the privileges, immunities and powers of the respective Houses, including the ultimate authority of the Speakers of the Senate and House of Commons over access and security of Parliament and ensuring the continued employment of our existing and respected Parliamentary Security staff, whose exemplary work on October 22, 2014, quickly brought an end to the security threat on Parliament Hill.”.
Debate arose thereon.
2015-02-06 [p.2115]
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of intention to move at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 57, that, in relation to the consideration of Government Business No. 14, the debate not be further adjourned.
2015-02-06 [p.2115]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Duncan (Minister of State), seconded by Mrs. Aglukkaq (Minister of the Environment, Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency and Minister for the Arctic Council); (Government Business No. 14)
And of the amendment of Ms. Turmel (Hull—Aylmer), seconded by Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster).
The debate continued.
2014-09-25 [p.1487]
A question of privilege having been raised by Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst), the Speaker ruled that there was a prima facie case of privilege;
Whereupon, Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst), seconded by Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster), moved, — That the question of privilege regarding the free movement of Members of Parliament within the Parliamentary Precinct during the state visit of September 25, 2014, be referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-06-13 [p.3405]
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the House commend and thank the RCMP for the excellent work that they do protecting Parliamentarians and all staff who work in the Parliamentary Precinct, recognize that traffic regulations and signage are important for the safety of those working on the Hill, including construction personnel and visitors, and that the House remind all Members and staff that their full compliance and cooperation are required.
2012-05-31 [p.1353]
Mr. Preston (Elgin—Middlesex—London), from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the 26th Report of the Committee, (question of privilege relating to the free movement of Members within the Parliamentary Precinct). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-411-106.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 35 to 38) was tabled.
2012-03-15 [p.991]
A question of privilege having been raised by Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre), the Speaker ruled that there was a prima facie case of privilege;
Whereupon, Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre), seconded by Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh), moved, — That the question of privilege regarding the free movement of Members of Parliament within the Parliamentary Precinct during the state visit of March 2, 2012, be referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.
Debate arose thereon.
2009-05-25 [p.515]
Q-151 — Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — With respect to the government's hospitality spending: (a) how much did the government spend on the purchase of alcoholic drinks for hospitality purposes including wine, beer and hard liquor, during receptions and other similar events, such as lunches, dinners, meetings, and all such similar gatherings, hosted in the Parliamentary precinct, for the fiscal year 2007-2008; and (b) what departmental measures are in place to monitor expenditures on alcohol at public expense? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-151.
Results: 1 - 28 of 28

Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data