Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 20 of 20
2019-05-06 [p.5247]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the return to the following questions made into Orders for Return:
Q-2339 — Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte) — With regard to the government paying for outside legal counsel for individuals related to the SNC-Lavalin scandal: (a) what is the complete list of individuals for which the government has approved paying legal fees; (b) for each individual in (a), (i) what firm has been retained, (ii) what is the retainer or agreed upon rate, (iii) what is the maximum expenditure amount the government has authorized? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2339.
2019-05-03 [p.5235]
Q-2333 — Mr. Barrett (Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes) — With regard to contracts signed by the government in order to assist with the fallout over the SNC-Lavalin controversy: what are the details of all such contracts, including (i) vendor, (ii) date, (iii) amount, (iv) description of goods or services, (v) duration of contract? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2333.
2019-04-30 [p.5198]
Pursuant to Order made Monday, April 29, 2019, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Blaikie (Elmwood—Transcona), seconded by Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay), — That, in the opinion of the House, corporate executives and their lobbyists have had too much access to and influence over the Government of Canada, setting working Canadians and their families back by:
(a) encouraging attempts by the Prime Minister to undermine the independence of the Public Prosecution Service of Canada and the integrity of Canada’s rule of law;
(b) forcing Canadians to pay high prices for prescription drugs by blocking the establishment of a single, public and universal drug insurance plan;
(c) providing huge subsidies to large oil and gas companies, while putting corporate interests over the protection of Canada’s Pacific coastal waters in the Kinder Morgan pipeline approval process;
(d) motivating the Minister of Environment and Climate Change to give a handout of $12 million to a multi-billion-dollar corporation owned by one of Canada's wealthiest families;
(e) giving Canada's most profitable banks the chance to review and revise a report intended to shed light on anti-consumer banking practices; and
(f) leaving intact a host of tax loopholes that allow the richest Canadians to avoid paying their fair share for Canada’s public services like health care, pensions and housing;
and that therefore, as a first step toward addressing these failings, the government should immediately move to recover the $12 million given to Loblaws and reinvest it to the benefit of working Canadians and their families.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 1299 -- Vote no 1299) - View vote details.
YEAS: 46, NAYS: 251
2019-04-29 [p.5177]
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.
Mr. Blaikie (Elmwood—Transcona), seconded by Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay), moved, — That, in the opinion of the House, corporate executives and their lobbyists have had too much access to and influence over the Government of Canada, setting working Canadians and their families back by:
(a) encouraging attempts by the Prime Minister to undermine the independence of the Public Prosecution Service of Canada and the integrity of Canada’s rule of law;
(b) forcing Canadians to pay high prices for prescription drugs by blocking the establishment of a single, public and universal drug insurance plan;
(c) providing huge subsidies to large oil and gas companies, while putting corporate interests over the protection of Canada’s Pacific coastal waters in the Kinder Morgan pipeline approval process;
(d) motivating the Minister of Environment and Climate Change to give a handout of $12 million to a multi-billion-dollar corporation owned by one of Canada's wealthiest families;
(e) giving Canada's most profitable banks the chance to review and revise a report intended to shed light on anti-consumer banking practices; and
(f) leaving intact a host of tax loopholes that allow the richest Canadians to avoid paying their fair share for Canada’s public services like health care, pensions and housing;
and that therefore, as a first step toward addressing these failings, the government should immediately move to recover the $12 million given to Loblaws and reinvest it to the benefit of working Canadians and their families.
Debate arose thereon.
2019-04-29 [p.5184]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, at the conclusion of today's debate on the opposition motion in the name of the Member for Elmwood—Transcona, all questions necessary to dispose of the motion be deemed put and a recorded division deemed requested and deferred until Tuesday, April 30, 2019, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2019-04-29 [p.5190]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Blaikie (Elmwood—Transcona), seconded by Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay), in relation to the Business of Supply.
The debate continued.
2019-04-29 [p.5191]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Blaikie (Elmwood—Transcona), seconded by Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay), in relation to the Business of Supply.
The debate continued.
2019-04-29 [p.5191]
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, the question was deemed put on the motion and the recorded division was deemed requested and deferred until Tuesday, April 30, 2019, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2019-02-28 [p.4671]
Pursuant to Standing Order 52, Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar) asked leave to move the adjournment of the House for the purpose of discussing a specific and important matter requiring urgent consideration, namely, the alleged political interference regarding a remediation agreement.
The Speaker decided that the matter was proper to be discussed and, pursuant to Standing Order 52(9), directed that it be considered later today, at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment.
2019-02-28 [p.4673]
Pursuant to Standing Order 52(10), the House proceeded to the consideration of a motion to adjourn the House for the purpose of discussing an important matter requiring urgent consideration, namely, the alleged political interference regarding a remediation agreement.
Ms. Bergen (Portage—Lisgar), seconded by Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), moved, — That this House do now adjourn.
Debate arose thereon.
At midnight, the Speaker declared the motion adopted.
2019-02-25 [p.4623]
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.
Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle), seconded by Ms. Raitt (Milton), moved, — That, given the Prime Minister's comments of Wednesday, February 20, 2019, that the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights is the appropriate place for Canadians to get answers on the SNC-Lavalin affair, and given his alleged direct involvement in a sustained effort to influence SNC-Lavalin's criminal prosecution, the House order the Prime Minister to appear, testify and answer questions at the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, under oath, for a televised two-hour meeting, before Friday, March 15, 2019.
Debate arose thereon.
2019-02-25 [p.4625]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Scheer (Regina—Qu'Appelle), seconded by Ms. Raitt (Milton), in relation to the Business of Supply.
The debate continued.
2019-02-20 [p.4593]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, February 19, 2019, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay), seconded by Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), — That the House: (a) call on the Prime Minister to waive solicitor-client privilege for the former Attorney General with respect to allegations of interference in the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin; and (b) urge the government to launch a public inquiry, under the Inquiries Act, in order to provide Canadians with the transparency and accountability promised by the Liberals in the 2015 election campaign.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Ms. Sansoucy (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot), — That the motion be amended by adding after the word “Act,” the following: “and to table the report in the House by May 31, 2019,”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 991 -- Vote no 991) - View vote details.
YEAS: 133, NAYS: 159
2019-02-20 [p.4595]
Pursuant to Standing Order 81(16), the House proceeded to the putting of the question on the main motion of Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay), seconded by Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke).
The question was put on the main motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 992 -- Vote no 992) - View vote details.
YEAS: 134, NAYS: 160
2019-02-19 [p.4589]
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.
Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay), seconded by Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), moved, — That the House: (a) call on the Prime Minister to waive solicitor-client privilege for the former Attorney General with respect to allegations of interference in the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin; and (b) urge the government to launch a public inquiry, under the Inquiries Act, in order to provide Canadians with the transparency and accountability promised by the Liberals in the 2015 election campaign.
Debate arose thereon.
2019-02-19 [p.4589]
Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Ms. Sansoucy (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by adding after the word “Act,” the following: “and to table the report in the House by May 31, 2019,”.
Debate arose thereon.
2019-02-19 [p.4589]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay), seconded by Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), in relation to the Business of Supply;
And of the amendment of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Ms. Sansoucy (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot).
The debate continued.
2019-02-19 [p.4590]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay), seconded by Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), in relation to the Business of Supply;
And of the amendment of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Ms. Sansoucy (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot).
The debate continued.
2019-02-19 [p.4590]
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, the question was deemed put on the amendment and the recorded division was deemed requested and deferred until Wednesday, February 20, 2019, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
Results: 1 - 20 of 20

Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data