Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 11 of 11
2019-05-27 [p.5339]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return:
Q-2371 — Mr. Davidson (York—Simcoe) — With regard to the March 2019 leak of information related to the Supreme Court nomination process: does anyone in the Office of the Prime Minister know who leaked the information, and, if so, who leaked the information? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2371.
2019-05-17 [p.5329]
Q-2363 — Mr. Strahl (Chilliwack—Hope) — With regard to the March 2019 leak of information related to the Supreme Court nomination process: (a) what investigative process, if any, is the government conducting to find out who leaked the information; and (b) did any current or former employees of the Office of the Prime Minister leak the information to anyone and, if so, who? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2363.
2018-06-19 [p.3837]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Choquette (Drummond), seconded by Ms. Quach (Salaberry—Suroît), Bill C-411, An Act to amend the Official Languages Act (understanding of official languages), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2017-10-31 [p.2315]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Choquette (Drummond), seconded by Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby), Bill C-382, An Act to amend the Official Languages Act (Supreme Court of Canada), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2017-06-13 [p.1929]
— by Ms. Wilson-Raybould (Minister of Justice) — Response of the government, pursuant to Standing Order 109, to the Ninth Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, "The New Process for Judicial Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada" (Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-152), presented to the House on Wednesday, February 22, 2017. — Sessional Paper No. 8512-421-152.
2017-02-22 [p.1379]
Mr. Housefather (Mount Royal), from the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented the Ninth Report of the Committee, "The New Process for Judicial Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-152.
Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 23, 30, 32, 41 and 45) was tabled.
2016-09-27 [p.791]
Pursuant to Order made Thursday, September 22, 2016, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Nicholson (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton), — That the House call on the government to respect the custom of regional representation when making appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada and, in particular, when replacing the retiring Justice Thomas Cromwell, who is Atlantic Canada’s representative on the Supreme Court.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 109 -- Vote no 109) - View vote details.
YEAS: 270, NAYS: 0
2016-09-22 [p.776]
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.
Mr. Nicholson (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton), moved, — That the House call on the government to respect the custom of regional representation when making appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada and, in particular, when replacing the retiring Justice Thomas Cromwell, who is Atlantic Canada’s representative on the Supreme Court.
Debate arose thereon.
2016-09-22 [p.776]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Nicholson (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton), in relation to the Business of Supply.
The debate continued.
2016-09-22 [p.776]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Nicholson (Niagara Falls), seconded by Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton), in relation to the Business of Supply.
The debate continued.
2016-09-22 [p.777]
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, the question was deemed put on the motion and the recorded division was deemed requested and deferred until Tuesday, September 27, 2016, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
Results: 1 - 11 of 11

Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data