Committee
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 30 of 1143
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
This is a simple deletion of five lines that is proposed by the Green Party. That's it, and there is no replacement.
I think it speaks for itself. They're important lines, they should be in there. We heard them from witnesses.
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
I want to read what's in clause 15, on socio-economic conditions:
the child must not be apprehended solely on the basis of his or her socio-economic conditions, including poverty, lack of adequate housing or infrastructure or the state of health of his or her parent or the care provider
I would argue that the words in the amendments are substantially already in the bill. Also, we have heard several indigenous organizations, including the Manitoba Metis Federation, speak in more detail in support of this particular clause.
That's all I wanted to put on the record.
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
I was simply going to say that I agree with MP McLeod. Also it could be that three years is too soon to actually do a complete review. There's always the possibility through the minister's office and I think it's also something that should be discussed with indigenous nations.
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
I want to put on the record that the work brought forward by the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs is substantial. If we approve this bill on indigenous child welfare, it will do nothing but help the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs and Grand Chief Arlen Dumas to bring forward their own laws on indigenous child welfare for their jurisdiction and for their nation.
I commend Mr. Viersen for his attempt to incorporate it into our bill, but our bill will do nothing but help what Mr. Dumas and the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs are trying to do.
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
Thank you very much.
First of all, I thank all three delegations for your presentations.
It's great to see you, Josh. It's always nice to see another Manitoba Métis here in Ottawa. You're doing a great job.
My question is for Pamela Palmater. We've been working on this for a while. The issue of paramountcy is incredibly important in this bill. I want to read you subclause 22(3) and have you comment on it:
For greater certainty, if there is a conflict or inconsistency between a provision respecting child and family services that is in a law of an Indigenous group, community or people and a provision respecting child and family services that is in a provincial Act or regulation, the provision that is in the law of the Indigenous group, community or people prevails to the extent of the conflict or inconsistency.
That seems pretty clear to me, and pretty powerful. I'd like you to comment on how you interpret this.
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
That's not accurate, because subclause 22(1) has precisely the same wording, only the laws of the indigenous group or people will trump federal law, as well. We're not talking about the same thing here.
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
First of all, thank you all very much for your presentations.
I'm going to begin by reading directly from the bill and asking for comment from both of you.
Clause 22 talks about, in my opinion, the nexus of this bill. The really powerful part is the issue of paramountcy. It gives indigenous nations paramountcy over federal and provincial law.
I want to read directly from the bill:
22 (1) If there is a conflict or inconsistency between a provision respecting child and family services that is in a law of an Indigenous group, community or people and a provision respecting child and family services...that is in a federal Act or regulation, the provision that is in the law of the Indigenous group, community or people prevails to the extent of the conflict or inconsistency.
Morley Watson, can you perhaps comment on this provision and how you see this?
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
Thank you, Morley Watson.
Jerry, do you want to comment on what I just read?
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
You have 34 first nations, 14 agencies. I'm assuming that since you are clearly supportive, your constituency first nations are also supportive?
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
Thank you very much for both presentations. They were very informative.
My first question will go to Lyle Thomas and Bernie Charlie.
What are the greatest challenges to providing child welfare services in your territory?
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
Thank you.
The next question will go to Chief Wilson. There's been quite a lot of discussion about the importance of defining the best interests of the child. That was discussed this morning, I believe. I'm not sure if it was your presentation or the prior presentation that emphasized the importance of family, but one of the clauses we have in this bill is.... One of the factors to be considered when talking about the best interests of the child is the importance to the child of an ongoing relationship with the indigenous group, community or people to which the child belongs in order to preserve the child's cultural identity and connections to the language and territory of that indigenous group, community or people.
That's in the current bill. Could you comment on this clause?
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much, all three of you, for your presentations.
President David Chartrand, in the early 2000s the Government of Manitoba devolved child welfare. I believe you were still president—I was a city councillor, and MaryAnn was a cabinet minister, I believe. However, with the devolution of child welfare in Manitoba, the removal of children increased. Could you comment on that from your perspectives from the Métis federation?
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
I was only going to suggest that, rather than waste the time of the delegations over this, we could discuss this at the end of the meeting and decide then, and just continue hearing the delegations.
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
I completely agree with Rachel. It's just if we could get five minutes, we could vote on this before the end of our meeting today at 1:30. That way, we could continue with our delegations. We commit to vote on it.
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
Thank you very much.
First of all, thank you for all of your presentations. They were very good.
I've worked on this for a while and the nexus point of the bill is really to affirm the inherent right of all indigenous nations across Canada, including Manitoba, to develop and to implement their own laws regarding child welfare.
I want to read directly from the bill. Clause 22 talks about indigenous nations and federal laws, stating, “If there is a conflict or inconsistency between a provision respecting child and family services that is in a law of an Indigenous group, community or people and a provision respecting child and family services” that is a federal act, “the provision that is in the law of the Indigenous group, community or people prevails to the extent of the conflict or inconsistency.”
Subclause 22(3) also concerns relations with the province:
For greater certainty, if there is a conflict or inconsistency between a provision respecting child and family services that is in a law of an Indigenous group, community or people and a provision respecting child and family services that is in a provincial Act or regulation, the provision that is in the law of the Indigenous group community or people prevails to the extent of the conflict or inconsistency.
My question is for Grand Chief Dumas. I haven't read your bill, but if there is a conflict with either the province or the federal government, your law would prevail. Based on that, I'm having a hard time understanding where the conflict is that you or the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs have with this bill.
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
You're saying that, in spite of the words in the bill that give you paramountcy over provincial laws and federal laws, that's not going to happen.
View Dan Vandal Profile
Lib. (MB)
Grand Chief, with all due respect to your opinion, we've had constitutional experts sitting where you are now, saying that the provisions in this bill shall override the provincial perspective, or even the federal perspective. We have spoken to a lot of people—constitutional experts—who have an opinion differing from yours.
Results: 1 - 30 of 1143 | Page: 1 of 39

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data