Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 23 of 23
2019-03-18 [p.4685]
— No. 421-03136 concerning telecommunications. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-78-08;
2019-02-06 [p.4573]
At 5:47 p.m., by unanimous consent and pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Rayes (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), — That, given:
(a) the House has great respect for provincial jurisdiction and trust in provincial institutions;
(b) the people of Quebec are burdened with completing and submitting two tax returns, one federal and one provincial; and
(c) the House believes in cutting red tape and reducing unnecessary paperwork to improve the everyday lives of families; therefore,
the House call on the government to work with the Government of Quebec to implement a single tax return in Quebec, as adopted unanimously in the motion of the National Assembly of Quebec on May 15, 2018.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 990 -- Vote no 990) - View vote details.
YEAS: 80, NAYS: 191
2019-02-05 [p.4562]
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.
Mr. Rayes (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved, — That, given:
(a) the House has great respect for provincial jurisdiction and trust in provincial institutions;
(b) the people of Quebec are burdened with completing and submitting two tax returns, one federal and one provincial; and
(c) the House believes in cutting red tape and reducing unnecessary paperwork to improve the everyday lives of families; therefore,
the House call on the government to work with the Government of Quebec to implement a single tax return in Quebec, as adopted unanimously in the motion of the National Assembly of Quebec on May 15, 2018.
Debate arose thereon.
2019-02-05 [p.4566]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Rayes (Richmond—Arthabaska), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), in relation to the Business of Supply.
The debate continued.
2019-02-05 [p.4566]
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, February 6, 2019, at the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders.
2019-01-30 [p.4545]
— by Mr. Bernier (Beauce), one concerning telecommunications (No. 421-03136);
2018-11-01 [p.4214]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Beaulieu (La Pointe-de-l'Île), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), Bill C-421, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (adequate knowledge of French in Quebec), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2018-09-17 [p.3927]
Q-1619 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to government spending in the federal ridings of Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia and Gaspésie–Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine, respectively, between October 19, 2015, and today: (a) how much did the government invest in projects under the Canada Community Infrastructure Program and the Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program, broken down by (i) name of the project, (ii) type of project, (iii) location of the project, (iv) submission date of the project, (v) approval date of the project, (vi) projected cost of the project, (vii) total cost of the project; and (b) how much did the government invest through the various government programs other than the Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program (such as, but not limited to, the New Building Canada Fund—Quebec, New Horizons and the various Canadian Heritage funds), broken down by (i) name of the project, (ii) type of project, (iii) location of the project, (iv) submission date of the project, (v) approval date of the project, (vi) projected cost of the project, (vii) total cost of the project? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1619-01.
2018-05-22 [p.3252]
Q-1618 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to the methods used by Statistics Canada: (a) what method did Statistics Canada use to calculate the unemployment rate and full-time and part-time employment rates in Canada in 2017-18, (i) do the current methods differ from those used in 2015 and in 2010, (ii) if the answer to (a)(i) is affirmative, that the current methods differ from those used in 2010 and 2015, how do they differ; (b) what data collection procedures did Statistics Canada use for the unemployment rate and full-time and part-time employment rates for 2017-18, (i) do the current procedures differ from those used in 2015 and in 2010, (ii) if the answer to (b)(i) is affirmative, that the current procedures differ from those used in 2010 and 2015, how do they differ; (c) what calculation methods and data collection procedures were used for the unemployment rate and full-time and part-time employment rates, respectively, in the economic regions of Gaspé-Magdalen Islands (10), Lower St. Lawrence and North Shore (19) and Restigouche-Albert (09) in 2010, 2015, and 2017-18, (i) do the current calculation methods and data collection procedures differ from those used in 2015 and 2010, (ii) if the answer to (c)(i) is affirmative, that the current calculation methods and data collection procedures differ from those used in 2015 and 2010, how do they differ; and (d) what percentage and number of senior citizens receiving a pension were included in the collection of data on the unemployment and employment rates in the economic regions of Gaspé-Magdalen Islands (10), Lower St. Lawrence and North Shore (19) and Restigouche-Albert (09) in 2010, 2015, and 2017-18? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1618.
2018-05-22 [p.3253]
Q-1619 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to government spending in the federal ridings of Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques, Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia and Gaspésie–Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine, respectively, between October 19, 2015, and today: (a) how much did the government invest in projects under the Canada Community Infrastructure Program and the Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program, broken down by (i) name of the project, (ii) type of project, (iii) location of the project, (iv) submission date of the project, (v) approval date of the project, (vi) projected cost of the project, (vii) total cost of the project; and (b) how much did the government invest through the various government programs other than the Canada 150 Community Infrastructure Program (such as, but not limited to, the New Building Canada Fund—Quebec, New Horizons and the various Canadian Heritage funds), broken down by (i) name of the project, (ii) type of project, (iii) location of the project, (iv) submission date of the project, (v) approval date of the project, (vi) projected cost of the project, (vii) total cost of the project? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1619.
2018-03-29 [p.3063]
Q-1498 — Mr. Ste-Marie (Joliette) — With regard to federal spending in Quebec ridings for each fiscal year since 2010-11, inclusively: what are the details of all grants, contributions, and loans to all organizations, groups, businesses or municipalities, broken down by (i) constituency, (ii) name of recipient, (iii) municipality in which the recipient is located, (iv) date the funding was received, (v) amount received, (vi) granting department or agency, (vii) program under which the grant, contribution or loan was allocated, (viii) nature or purpose? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1498.
2018-02-01 [p.2636]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), seconded by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), Bill C-393, An Act to amend the Canadian Multiculturalism Act (non-application in Quebec), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2017-09-21 [p.2142]
By unanimous consent, it was resolved, — That the House respect democracy and reaffirm Quebec’s right to debate and legislate on all issues under its jurisdiction.
2017-04-06 [p.1589]
Q-880 — Ms. Quach (Salaberry—Suroît) — With regard to infrastructure spending: since Budget 2016 was tabled, what infrastructure projects for post-secondary institutions in Quebec have received grants, broken down by (i) riding, (ii) funding program, (iii) total project budget, (iv) amount of federal grants, in dollars and as a percentage of the total project budget, (v) date of the announcement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-880.
2016-09-19 [p.713]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:
— Nos. 421-00301, 421-00316, 421-00485 and 421-00492 concerning the protection of the environment. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-3-08;
2016-09-16 [p.713]
— Nos. 421-00431, 421-00432, 421-00433 and 421-00549 concerning oil and gas exploration. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-67-01;
2016-09-19 [p.724]
Q-206 — Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques) — With regard to the 25 ports or wharves that the government wants to divest in the regions of the Lower St. Lawrence, the Gaspé and the North Shore (specifically in the communities of Baie-Comeau, Baie-Johan-Beetz, Blanc-Sablon, Cap-aux-Meules, Carleton, Chandler, Gaspé, Gros Cacouna, Harrington Harbour, Kégaska, La Romaine, La Tabatière, Les Méchins, Matane, Miguasha, Mont-Louis, Natashquan, Paspébiac, Pointe-au-Père (breakwater), Rimouski, Saint-Augustin, Tête-à-la-Baleine, and Vieux-Fort): what are the estimated costs of repairing each of these 25 ports or wharves, broken down by port or wharf? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-206.
2016-06-17 [p.665]
— by Ms. Pauzé (Repentigny), one concerning oil and gas exploration (No. 421-00549);
2016-06-08 [p.583]
— by Mr. Plamondon (Bécancour—Nicolet—Saurel), three concerning oil and gas exploration (Nos. 421-00431 to 421-00433);
2016-03-09 [p.251]
Q-34 — Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke) — With regard to the Canada (Ontario Boundary) Act, 1889: (a) does the middle of the main channel of the Ottawa River, from the head of Lake Temiscamingue to the intersection by the prolongation of the western limits of the Seigneurie of Rigaud, such mid-channel being as indicated on a map of the Ottawa Ship Canal Survey by Walter Shanly, C.E., still delineate the boundary between Ontario and Quebec; (b) are copies of the Order of the Governor-General in Council, dated July 21, 1886, that approved the mid-channel boundary described in (a), available to members of the public, and if not, why not; (c) are certified copies of the map referred to in the Canada (Ontario Boundary) Act, 1889, showing the mid-channel described in (a), available to members of the public, and if not, why not; and (d) has either the Province of Quebec or the Province of Ontario challenged the location of the boundary since the Canada (Ontario Boundary) Act, 1889, received Royal Assent? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-34.
Results: 1 - 23 of 23

Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data