Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 100 of 479
2015-06-18 [p.2836]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, June 17, 2015, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Moore (Minister of Industry), seconded by Mr. Duncan (Minister of State), — That Bill S-4, An Act to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, be now read a third time and do pass.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Rankin (Victoria), seconded by Mr. Chicoine (Châteauguay—Saint-Constant), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“this House decline to give third reading to Bill S-4, An Act to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, because it:
(a) threatens the privacy protections of Canadians by allowing for the voluntary disclosure of their personal information among organizations without the knowledge or consent of the individuals affected;
(b) fails to eliminate loopholes in privacy law that allow the backdoor sharing of personal information between Internet service providers and government agencies;
(c) fails to put in place a supervision mechanism to ensure that voluntary disclosures are made only in extreme circumstances;
(d) does not give the Privacy Commissioner of Canada adequate order-making powers to enforce compliance with privacy law; and
(e) proposes a mandatory data-breach reporting mechanism that will likely result in under-reporting of breaches.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 465 -- Vote no 465) - View vote details.
YEAS: 105, NAYS: 141
2015-06-18 [p.2838]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, June 17, 2015, the question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 466 -- Vote no 466) - View vote details.
YEAS: 141, NAYS: 105
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2015-06-18 [p.2840]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, June 17, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. MacKay (Minister of Justice), seconded by Ms. Rempel (Minister of State (Western Economic Diversification)), — That Bill S-2, An Act to amend the Statutory Instruments Act and to make consequential amendments to the Statutory Instruments Regulations, be now read a third time and do pass.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 467 -- Vote no 467) - View vote details.
YEAS: 141, NAYS: 104
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2015-06-17 [p.2797]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 16, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Lobb (Huron—Bruce), seconded by Mr. Toet (Elmwood—Transcona), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should, while respecting provincial and territorial jurisdiction, continue to take the necessary measures to prevent Alzheimer's disease and other dementias and to reduce the impact of dementia for those living with this disease, as well as for their families and caregivers, by continuing to focus on: (a) taking leadership appropriate to the federal role that will encourage a collaborative and coordinated approach with the provinces and territories to develop a pan-Canadian strategy for dementia, as agreed to at the recent federal-provincial-territorial Health Ministers' meeting; (b) partnerships within Canada and internationally, including commitments with G7 partners, and the work initiated at the 2014 Canada-France Global Dementia Legacy Summit, to accelerate the discovery and development of approaches for the prevention, early diagnosis, delay of onset, and treatment of dementia; (c) education and awareness to reduce the stigma associated with dementia, including the implementation of the Dementia Friends Canada initiative; (d) dementia research with a focus on primary prevention, secondary prevention, and quality of life, including those initiatives outlined in the National Dementia Research and Prevention Plan; (e) promoting the sharing of best practices among all jurisdictions to ensure awareness of promising treatments and services; (f) continuing to work in partnership with relevant stakeholders, including families affected by dementia and leading national groups such as the Alzheimer Society of Canada and the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging; (g) ensuring the full inclusion of all Canadians living with dementia, regardless of age, when acting on the above; (h) continuing to support, through national surveillance systems, the collection of data on key aspects of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in order to inform evidence-based analysis and policy-making; and (i) keeping Canadians informed as progress is made. (Private Members' Business M-575)
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 457 -- Vote no 457) - View vote details.
YEAS: 277, NAYS: 0
2015-06-17 [p.2799]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 16, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Giguère (Marc-Aurèle-Fortin), seconded by Mrs. Day (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), — That, in the opinion of the House, small- and medium-sized business owners are the driving force of job creation in Canada, and Canadian retailers and merchants pay credit card merchant fees that are among the highest in the world, and therefore the government should take immediate steps to make the cost of living more affordable for the middle class by: (a) lowering costs for businesses and consumers by reducing transaction fees charged to merchants; and (b) allowing merchants to disclose to the consumer the transaction costs relating to the payment method chosen at the point of sale. (Private Members' Business M-574)
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 458 -- Vote no 458) - View vote details.
YEAS: 127, NAYS: 149
2015-06-17 [p.2801]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 16, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Komarnicki (Souris—Moose Mountain), seconded by Mr. Payne (Medicine Hat), — That, in the opinion of the House, all Members of Parliament should be allowed to vote freely on all matters of conscience. (Private Members' Business M-590)
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 459 -- Vote no 459) - View vote details.
YEAS: 273, NAYS: 1
2015-06-17 [p.2803]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 16, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Bennett (St. Paul's), seconded by Mr. Easter (Malpeque), — That, in the opinion of the House, the tragic and inequitable issue of missing and murdered Aboriginal women and girls is of critical importance for all Canadians; that the government has failed to provide justice for the victims, healing for the families, or an end to the violence; and that the House call on the government to take immediate action to deal with this systemic problem and call a public inquiry. (Private Members' Business M-411)
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 460 -- Vote no 460) - View vote details.
YEAS: 129, NAYS: 147
2015-06-17 [p.2805]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 16, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on a Ways and Means motion to introduce an Act to implement the accord between the Government of Canada and the Government of Quebec for the joint management of petroleum resources in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and to make consequential amendments to other Acts. (Ways and Means No. 25)
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 461 -- Vote no 461) - View vote details.
YEAS: 185, NAYS: 91
2015-06-17 [p.2806]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 16, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on a Ways and Means motion to amend the Income Tax Act. (Ways and Means No. 26)
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 462 -- Vote no 462) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 126
2015-06-17 [p.2808]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 16, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), seconded by Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), — That, in the opinion of the House: (a) the unemployment rate in Canada has remained high since the 2008 recession; (b) the quality of the Canadian job market has reached a 25-year low; (c) the government should redesign its economic policy to support the middle class and help small-business owners and the manufacturing sector to create new jobs by (i) immediately lowering the small- and medium-sized business tax rate by 1% and by another percentage point when finances permit, (ii) establishing an innovation tax credit, (iii) extending the accelerated capital cost allowance in order to create good middle-class jobs, (iv) working with the provinces, territories and First Nations to train Canadians to occupy well-paid jobs. (Private Members' Business M-585)
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 463 -- Vote no 463) - View vote details.
YEAS: 127, NAYS: 145
2015-06-17 [p.2810]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 16, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Reid (Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Carleton—Mississippi Mills), — That the 21st Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Friday, October 3, 2014, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 35)
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 464 -- Vote no 464) - View vote details.
YEAS: 169, NAYS: 97
2015-06-17 [p.2827]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing or Special Order or usual practice of the House:
(a) when no Member rises to speak at the third reading stage of Bill S-4, An Act to amend the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, or at 6:30 p.m. this day, whichever comes first, every question necessary to dispose of the said stage of the said Bill shall be deemed put, and a recorded division deemed demanded and deferred until the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions on Thursday, June 18, 2015; and
(b) when no Member rises to speak at the third reading stage of Bill S-2, An Act to amend the Statutory Instruments Act and to make consequential amendments to the Statutory Instruments Regulations, or at 1:59 p.m. on Thursday, June 18, 2015, whichever comes first, every question necessary to dispose of the said stage of the said Bill shall be deemed put, and a recorded division deemed demanded and deferred until the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions on Thursday, June 18, 2015.
2015-06-16 [p.2791]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 456 -- Vote no 456) - View vote details.
YEAS: 185, NAYS: 86
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2015-06-16 [p.2793]
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, June 17, 2015, immediately before the time provided for Private Members' Business.
2015-06-16 [p.2793]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House:
(a) any recorded division which, at the time of the adoption of this Order, stands deferred until immediately before the time provided for Private Members’ Business on Wednesday, June 17, 2015, shall be deemed to stand deferred to the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions on the same day;
(b) if a recorded division is demanded or deemed demanded later this day, the said division shall be deemed deferred to the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions on Wednesday, June 17, 2015; and
(c) the Orders for consideration of Ways and Means motions Nos. 25 and 26 be deemed read, the motions to concur deemed moved, the questions deemed put, and recorded divisions deemed requested and deferred until Wednesday, June 17, 2015, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2015-06-15 [p.2766]
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 449 -- Vote no 449) - View vote details.
YEAS: 115, NAYS: 151
2015-06-15 [p.2768]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, June 10, 2015, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 450 -- Vote no 450) - View vote details.
YEAS: 150, NAYS: 116
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2015-06-15 [p.2770]
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. MacKay (Minister of Justice), seconded by Ms. Rempel (Minister of State (Western Economic Diversification)), — That Bill C-35, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (law enforcement animals, military animals and service animals), be now read a third time and do pass.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 451 -- Vote no 451) - View vote details.
YEAS: 266, NAYS: 0
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2015-06-15 [p.2771]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 2 of Ms. Péclet (La Pointe-de-l'Île), seconded by Ms. Boivin (Gatineau), — That Bill S-2 be amended by deleting Clause 2.
The question was put on Motion No. 2 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 452 -- Vote no 452) - View vote details.
YEAS: 115, NAYS: 151
2015-06-15 [p.2773]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 453 -- Vote no 453) - View vote details.
YEAS: 151, NAYS: 115
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House.
2015-06-15 [p.2775]
Group No. 1
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Ms. Blanchette-Lamothe (Pierrefonds—Dollard), seconded by Ms. Sitsabaiesan (Scarborough—Rouge River), — That Bill S-7 be amended by deleting the long title.
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 454 -- Vote no 454) - View vote details.
YEAS: 115, NAYS: 151
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 2, 3, 8 and 10 were also negatived on the same division.
2015-06-15 [p.2776]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 455 -- Vote no 455) - View vote details.
YEAS: 182, NAYS: 84
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House.
2015-06-10 [p.2697]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 436 -- Vote no 436) - View vote details.
YEAS: 141, NAYS: 122
2015-06-10 [p.2711]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 4 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Chambly—Borduas), — That Bill C-59 be amended by deleting Clause 29.
The question was put on Motion No. 4 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 438 -- Vote no 438) - View vote details.
YEAS: 92, NAYS: 176
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 5 to 9 were also negatived on the same division.
2015-06-10 [p.2713]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 13 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), — That Bill C-59 be amended by deleting Clause 44.
The question was put on Motion No. 13 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 439 -- Vote no 439) - View vote details.
YEAS: 124, NAYS: 144
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 14 to 41 were also negatived on the same division.
2015-06-10 [p.2715]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 44 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Chambly—Borduas), — That Bill C-59 be amended by deleting Clause 83.
The question was put on Motion No. 44 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 440 -- Vote no 440) - View vote details.
YEAS: 91, NAYS: 177
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 45 to 47 were also negatived on the same division.
2015-06-10 [p.2716]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 57 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Chambly—Borduas), — That Bill C-59 be amended by deleting Clause 98.
The question was put on Motion No. 57 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 441 -- Vote no 441) - View vote details.
YEAS: 91, NAYS: 177
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 58 to 111 were also negatived on the same division.
2015-06-10 [p.2718]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 115 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), — That Bill C-59 be amended by deleting Clause 168.
The question was put on Motion No. 115 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 442 -- Vote no 442) - View vote details.
YEAS: 91, NAYS: 177
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 117 to 124 were also negatived on the same division.
2015-06-10 [p.2720]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 125 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Chambly—Borduas), — That Bill C-59 be amended by deleting Clause 230.
The question was put on Motion No. 125 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 443 -- Vote no 443) - View vote details.
YEAS: 124, NAYS: 144
Accordingly, Motion No. 126 was also negatived on the same division.
2015-06-10 [p.2721]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 127 of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Dubé (Chambly—Borduas), — That Bill C-59 be amended by deleting Clause 253.
The question was put on Motion No. 127 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 444 -- Vote no 444) - View vote details.
YEAS: 124, NAYS: 144
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 128 to 147 were also negatived on the same division.
2015-06-10 [p.2724]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan), seconded by Mr. Casey (Charlottetown), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should ensure a safe, efficient, and sustainable transportation system for Prince Edward Island by: (a) recognizing the integral economic importance of the ferry service between Wood Islands, Prince Edward Island, and Caribou, Nova Scotia; and (b) committing to stable, long-term, sustainable, and adequate funding, notably by ensuring that all future contracts (i) are for no less than five years, (ii) maintain or exceed current levels of service. (Private Members' Business M-591)
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 446 -- Vote no 446) - View vote details.
YEAS: 124, NAYS: 142
2015-06-10 [p.2726]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Weston (Saint John), seconded by Mrs. O'Neill Gordon (Miramichi), — That Bill C-642, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (high profile offender), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 447 -- Vote no 447) - View vote details.
YEAS: 145, NAYS: 122
Accordingly, Bill C-642, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (high profile offender), was read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.
2015-06-10 [p.2728]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Leslie (Halifax), seconded by Mr. Cleary (St. John's South—Mount Pearl), — That Bill C-588, An Act to amend the Heritage Lighthouse Protection Act (Sambro Island Lighthouse), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 448 -- Vote no 448) - View vote details.
YEAS: 266, NAYS: 1
Accordingly, Bill C-588, An Act to amend the Heritage Lighthouse Protection Act (Sambro Island Lighthouse), was read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development.
2015-06-09 [p.2677]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 434 -- Vote no 434) - View vote details.
YEAS: 136, NAYS: 111
2015-06-09 [p.2679]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 435 -- Vote no 435) - View vote details.
YEAS: 138, NAYS: 116
2015-06-08 [p.2660]
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Bevington (Northwest Territories), seconded by Mr. Genest-Jourdain (Manicouagan), — That the House call on the government to take immediate action to fix Nutrition North Canada and to improve the well-being of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal Canadians in Northern Canada by: (a) immediately including in the Nutrition North Canada program the 50 isolated Northern communities accessible only by air that are not currently eligible for the full subsidy; (b) initiating a comprehensive review of the Nutrition North program, with Northerners as full partners, to determine ways of directly providing the subsidy to Northern residents and to improve supports for traditional foods; (c) creating equitable program-eligibility criteria for Northern communities based on their real circumstances; (d) providing sufficient funding to meet the needs of all Northern communities; and (e) working with all Northerners to develop a sustainable solution to food insecurity.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 421 -- Vote no 421) - View vote details.
YEAS: 125, NAYS: 148
2015-06-08 [p.2661]
Pursuant to Standing Order 81(18), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Aubin (Trois-Rivières), seconded by Mr. Chisholm (Dartmouth—Cole Harbour), — That, in the opinion of the House, employment insurance premiums paid by employers and workers must be used exclusively to finance benefits, as defined by the Employment Insurance Act, for unemployed workers and their families and that, consequently, the government should: (a) protect workers' and employers' premiums from political interference; (b) improve program accessibility to ensure that unemployed workers and their families can access it; and (c) abandon its plan, as set out in Budget 2015, to set rates unilaterally, in order to maintain long-term balance in the fund while improving accessibility.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 422 -- Vote no 422) - View vote details.
YEAS: 124, NAYS: 149
2015-06-08 [p.2663]
Pursuant to Standing Order 81(18), the House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 1 of Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. MacKay (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), — That Vote 1, in the amount of $57,031,359, under THE SENATE — The Senate — Program expenditures, in the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2016, be concurred in.
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 423 -- Vote no 423) - View vote details.
YEAS: 178, NAYS: 95
2015-06-08 [p.2665]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 424 -- Vote no 424) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 124
2015-06-08 [p.2667]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 425 -- Vote no 425) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 124
(See list under Division No. 424)
Accordingly, Bill C-66, An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the financial year ending March 31, 2016, was read the second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole.
2015-06-08 [p.2667]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 426 -- Vote no 426) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 124
(See list under Division No. 424)
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
2015-06-08 [p.2667]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 427 -- Vote no 427) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 124
(See list under Division No. 424)
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2015-06-08 [p.2667]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 428 -- Vote no 428) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 124
2015-06-08 [p.2669]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 429 -- Vote no 429) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 124
(See list under Division No. 428)
Accordingly, Bill C-67, An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the financial year ending March 31, 2016, was read the second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole.
2015-06-08 [p.2669]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 430 -- Vote no 430) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 124
(See list under Division No. 428)
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
2015-06-08 [p.2670]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 431 -- Vote no 431) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 124
(See list under Division No. 428)
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2015-06-08 [p.2670]
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mrs. Aglukkaq (Minister of the Environment, Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency and Minister for the Arctic Council), — That Bill S-6, An Act to amend the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Act and the Nunavut Waters and Nunavut Surface Rights Tribunal Act, be now read a third time and do pass.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Ms. Ashton (Churchill), seconded by Mr. Genest-Jourdain (Manicouagan), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“this House decline to give third reading to Bill S-6, An Act to amend the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Act and the Nunavut Waters and Surface Rights Tribunal Act, because it:
(a) was developed without adequate consultation with Yukon First Nations, as per the government of Canada’s constitutional duty, and without adequate consultation with the people of Yukon, as per the government’s democratic duty;
(b) provides the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development with authority to unilaterally issue binding policy direction on the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board, which undermines the neutrality of the environmental and socio-economic assessment process;
(c) provides the Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development with authority to delegate powers to the territorial minister without the consent of First Nations;
(d) provides broad exemptions for renewals and amendments of projects; and
(e) includes proposed timelines on the assessment process that will affect the thoroughness of environmental and socio-economic assessments and opportunities for First Nation input on major projects.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 432 -- Vote no 432) - View vote details.
YEAS: 125, NAYS: 148
2015-06-08 [p.2672]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, June 3, 2015, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 433 -- Vote no 433) - View vote details.
YEAS: 148, NAYS: 125
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2015-06-03 [p.2620]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 416 -- Vote no 416) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 106
2015-06-03 [p.2621]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 417 -- Vote no 417) - View vote details.
YEAS: 146, NAYS: 113
2015-06-03 [p.2625]
Group No. 1
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 1 of Mr. Bevington (Northwest Territories), seconded by Mr. Cleary (St. John's South—Mount Pearl), — That Bill S-6 be amended by deleting the long title.
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 418 -- Vote no 418) - View vote details.
YEAS: 118, NAYS: 147
Accordingly, Motions No. 4 to 7, and 10 were also negatived on the same division.
2015-06-03 [p.2626]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 419 -- Vote no 419) - View vote details.
YEAS: 148, NAYS: 119
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House.
2015-06-03 [p.2628]
Pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Perreault (Montcalm), seconded by Mr. Fletcher (Charleswood—St. James—Assiniboia), — That Bill C-643, An Act to establish National Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Day, be now read a third time and do pass.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 420 -- Vote no 420) - View vote details.
YEAS: 265, NAYS: 0
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2015-06-02 [p.2606]
Group No. 1
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Ms. Borg (Terrebonne—Blainville), seconded by Ms. Liu (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles), — That Bill S-4 be amended by deleting the long title.
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 411 -- Vote no 411) - View vote details.
YEAS: 124, NAYS: 150
Accordingly, Motion No. 4 was also negatived on the same division.
2015-06-02 [p.2607]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 2 of Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), seconded by Mr. Plamondon (Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour), — That Bill S-4 be amended by deleting Clause 1.
The question was put on Motion No. 2 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 412 -- Vote no 412) - View vote details.
YEAS: 38, NAYS: 237
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 3 and 5 were also negatived on the same division.
2015-06-02 [p.2609]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 413 -- Vote no 413) - View vote details.
YEAS: 150, NAYS: 126
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage and read the second time and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House.
2015-06-02 [p.2611]
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Cash (Davenport), seconded by Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should ban all pay-to-pay practices by banks operating in Canada, through the enactment of a mandatory financial code of conduct to protect consumers.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 414 -- Vote no 414) - View vote details.
YEAS: 274, NAYS: 1
2015-06-02 [p.2612]
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Young (Oakville), seconded by Mr. Chisu (Pickering—Scarborough East), — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Health, presented on Tuesday, October 21, 2014, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 33)
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 415 -- Vote no 415) - View vote details.
YEAS: 152, NAYS: 122
2015-06-01 [p.2600]
Pursuant to Order made Friday, May 29, 2015, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on a Ways and Means motion to amend the Excise Tax Act. (Ways and Means No. 23)
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 410 -- Vote no 410) - View vote details.
YEAS: 256, NAYS: 0
2015-05-28 [p.2585]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 409 -- Vote no 409) - View vote details.
YEAS: 137, NAYS: 98
2015-05-27 [p.2579]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Ashton (Churchill), seconded by Ms. Freeman (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should develop, in collaboration with the provinces, territories, civil society and First Nations, Métis and Inuit peoples and their representatives, a coordinated National Action Plan to Address Violence Against Women which would include: (a) initiatives to address socio-economic factors contributing to violence against women; (b) policies to prevent violence against women and policies to respond to survivors of violence; (c) benchmarks for measuring progress based on the collection of data on levels of violence against women over time; (d) independent research on emerging issues that relate to violence against women; (e) a national public inquiry into missing and murdered Aboriginal women and girls; (f) strategies that address the specific needs and vulnerabilities of different communities including specific attention to Aboriginal women, women with disabilities, women from minority groups and young women; (g) participation by community and other civil society organizations, including support for those organizations to participate in the implementation of the national action plan; and (h) human and financial resources earmarked specifically to carry out the program of action set by the plan. (Private Members' Business M-444)
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 408 -- Vote no 408) - View vote details.
YEAS: 120, NAYS: 146
2015-05-26 [p.2569]
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 407 -- Vote no 407) - View vote details.
YEAS: 119, NAYS: 145
2015-05-25 [p.2561]
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Duncan (Minister of State), — That Bill C-59, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on April 21, 2015 and other measures, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Caron (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“this House decline to give second reading to Bill C-59, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on April 21, 2015 and other measures, because it:
(a) fails to support working- and middle-class families through the introduction of affordable childcare and a $15-per-hour federal minimum wage;
(b) imposes wasteful and unfair income-splitting measures which primarily benefit the wealthy and offer nothing to 85% of Canadian families;
(c) fails to protect interns against workplace sexual harassment or unreasonable hours of work;
(d) implements expanded Tax-Free Savings Account measures which benefit the wealthiest households while leaving major fiscal problems to our grandchildren;
(e) rolls a separate, stand-alone, and supportable piece of legislation concerning Canada’s veterans into an omnibus bill that contains vastly unrelated, unsupportable measures; and
(f) attacks the right to free and fair collective bargaining for hundreds of thousands of Canadian workers.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 405 -- Vote no 405) - View vote details.
YEAS: 117, NAYS: 150
2015-05-25 [p.2563]
The question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 406 -- Vote no 406) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 118
Accordingly, Bill C-59, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on April 21, 2015 and other measures, was read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance.
2015-05-14 [p.2542]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 404 -- Vote no 404) - View vote details.
YEAS: 136, NAYS: 105
2015-05-13 [p.2531]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), seconded by Mr. Cleary (St. John's South—Mount Pearl), — That Bill C-638, An Act to amend the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 (wreck), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 403 -- Vote no 403) - View vote details.
YEAS: 113, NAYS: 145
2015-05-12 [p.2519]
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 401 -- Vote no 401) - View vote details.
YEAS: 117, NAYS: 145
2015-05-12 [p.2521]
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Donnelly (New Westminster—Coquitlam), seconded by Mr. Chicoine (Châteauguay—Saint-Constant), — That, in the opinion of the House, a standalone covenant of moral, social, legal, and fiduciary obligation exists between the Canadian people and the government to provide equitable financial compensation and support services to past and active members of the Canadian Armed Forces who have been injured, disabled or have died as a result of military service, and to their dependants, which the government is obligated to fulfil.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 402 -- Vote no 402) - View vote details.
YEAS: 266, NAYS: 0
2015-05-11 [p.2514]
At 6:16 p.m., by unanimous consent, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe), seconded by Ms. Freeman (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should remove the GST from feminine hygiene products.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 400 -- Vote no 400) - View vote details.
YEAS: 258, NAYS: 0
2015-05-07 [p.2500]
Pursuant to Standing Order 83(3), the question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 399 -- Vote no 399) - View vote details.
YEAS: 146, NAYS: 111
2015-05-06 [p.2484]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 5, 2015, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Blaney (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Rickford (Minister of Natural Resources and Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario), — That Bill C-51, An Act to enact the Security of Canada Information Sharing Act and the Secure Air Travel Act, to amend the Criminal Code, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts, be now read a third time and do pass.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Garrison (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca), seconded by Mr. Kellway (Beaches—East York), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following:
“this House decline to give third reading to Bill C-51, An Act to enact the Security of Canada Information Sharing Act and the Secure Air Travel Act, to amend the Criminal Code, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts, because it:
(a) threatens our way of life by asking Canadians to choose between their security and their freedoms;
(b) provides the Canadian Security Intelligence Service with a sweeping new mandate without equally increasing oversight, despite concerns raised by almost every witness who testified before the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, as well as concerns raised by former Liberal prime ministers, ministers of justice and solicitors general;
(c) does not include the type of concrete, effective measures that have been proven to work, such as providing support to communities that are struggling to counter radicalization;
(d) was not adequately studied by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, which did not allow the Privacy Commissioner of Canada to appear as a witness, or schedule enough meetings to hear from many other Canadians who requested to appear;
(e) was not fully debated in the House of Commons, where discussion was curtailed by time allocation;
(f) was condemned by legal experts, civil liberties advocates, privacy commissioners, First Nations leadership and business leaders, for the threats it poses to our rights and freedoms, and our economy; and
(g) does not include a single amendment proposed by members of the Official Opposition or the Liberal Party, despite the widespread concern about the bill and the dozens of amendments proposed by witnesses.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 394 -- Vote no 394) - View vote details.
YEAS: 95, NAYS: 183
2015-05-06 [p.2488]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Sopuck (Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette), seconded by Mr. Norlock (Northumberland—Quinte West), — That Bill C-637, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (firearms storage and transportation), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 396 -- Vote no 396) - View vote details.
YEAS: 151, NAYS: 128
Accordingly, Bill C-637, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (firearms storage and transportation), was read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.
2015-05-06 [p.2490]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Saganash (Abitibi—Baie-James—Nunavik—Eeyou), seconded by Ms. Ashton (Churchill), — That Bill C-641, An Act to ensure that the laws of Canada are in harmony with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 397 -- Vote no 397) - View vote details.
YEAS: 131, NAYS: 149
2015-05-06 [p.2492]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Gravelle (Nickel Belt), seconded by Mr. Rankin (Victoria), — That Bill C-356, An Act respecting a National Strategy for Dementia, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Health.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 398 -- Vote no 398) - View vote details.
YEAS: 139, NAYS: 140
2015-05-04 [p.2464]
Group No. 1
The House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 1 of Ms. Doré Lefebvre (Alfred-Pellan), seconded by Mr. Sullivan (York South—Weston), — That Bill C-51 be amended by deleting the long title.
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 391 -- Vote no 391) - View vote details.
YEAS: 79, NAYS: 169
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 2, 3, 5 to 44 and 46 to 66 were also negatived on the same division.
2015-05-04 [p.2466]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 392 -- Vote no 392) - View vote details.
YEAS: 169, NAYS: 79
Accordingly, the Bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House.
2015-05-04 [p.2467]
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Poilievre (Minister of State (Democratic Reform)), seconded by Mr. Rickford (Minister of Natural Resources and Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario), — That Bill C-50, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 393 -- Vote no 393) - View vote details.
YEAS: 142, NAYS: 106
Accordingly, Bill C-50, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act, was read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.
2015-04-30 [p.2445]
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 388 -- Vote no 388) - View vote details.
YEAS: 75, NAYS: 159
2015-04-30 [p.2447]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 389 -- Vote no 389) - View vote details.
YEAS: 134, NAYS: 104
2015-04-30 [p.2449]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 390 -- Vote no 390) - View vote details.
YEAS: 132, NAYS: 75
2015-04-29 [p.2433]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 382 -- Vote no 382) - View vote details.
YEAS: 153, NAYS: 123
2015-04-29 [p.2435]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion, as amended, of Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), seconded by Mr. Rousseau (Compton—Stanstead), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should present, as soon as possible, a mechanism that would allow non-designated airports, that is, airports that are not on the list of airports designated under the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority Act (CATSA), to provide, at their expense, CATSA security screening in a manner that would not compromise the health and safety of passengers, and would uphold existing CATSA standards. (Private Members' Business M-553)
The question was put on the motion, as amended, and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 383 -- Vote no 383) - View vote details.
YEAS: 276, NAYS: 0
2015-04-29 [p.2436]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Toone (Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine), seconded by Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst), — That Bill C-640, An Act respecting VIA Rail Canada and making consequential amendments to the Canada Transportation Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 384 -- Vote no 384) - View vote details.
YEAS: 122, NAYS: 152
2015-04-29 [p.2438]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier), seconded by Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor), — That Bill C-624, An Act to amend the National Anthem Act (gender), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 385 -- Vote no 385) - View vote details.
YEAS: 127, NAYS: 144
2015-04-28 [p.2425]
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 380 -- Vote no 380) - View vote details.
YEAS: 124, NAYS: 152
2015-04-28 [p.2427]
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), — That the House: (a) recognize that (i) since 2006, the government has spent nearly $750 million dollars on advertising, (ii) a great deal of this has been partisan advertising that serves no public interest, (iii) this is an affront to taxpayers who work hard and expect that the government will treat their money with respect; and therefore (b) call on the government to submit all advertising to a third-party review process before it is approved, to ensure that it is an appropriate, proportional, and prudent expenditure of public funds.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 381 -- Vote no 381) - View vote details.
YEAS: 126, NAYS: 151
2015-04-27 [p.2419]
Pursuant to Order made Monday, April 20, 2015, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Oliver (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Sorenson (Minister of State (Finance)), — That this House approve in general the budgetary policy of the government; (Ways and Means No. 18)
And of the amendment of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Côté (Beauport—Limoilou), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“this House not approve the budgetary policy of the government as it:
(a) gives billions of dollars in handouts to the wealthy few through income splitting, doubling Tax-Free Savings Accounts, and tax loopholes for CEOs;
(b) fails to help middle class families by creating affordable, quality childcare spaces;
(c) contains no plan to make life more affordable by tackling unfair ATM fees or high credit card rates;
(d) fails to restore the age of retirement to 65 by reversing cuts to Old Age Security;
(e) does nothing to help workers by reinstating the federal minimum wage and raising it to $15 an hour;
(f) fails to fight climate change or grow the economy while protecting the environment; and
(g) relies on one time asset sales and accounting sleight-of-hand to achieve a balance.”.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the subamendment of Mr. Trudeau (Papineau), seconded by Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants), — That the amendment be amended by adding the following:
“(h) unfairly benefits the rich instead of helping the middle class and those working hard to join it; and
(i) contains no plan for jobs and growth.”.
The question was put on the subamendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 379 -- Vote no 379) - View vote details.
YEAS: 114, NAYS: 147
2015-04-22 [p.2391]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Liu (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles), seconded by Mr. Rankin (Victoria), — That Bill C-636, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (unpaid training), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 377 -- Vote no 377) - View vote details.
YEAS: 125, NAYS: 136
2015-04-22 [p.2393]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Eyking (Sydney—Victoria), seconded by Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should take steps to provide an increased level of rail service throughout Canada by: (a) recognizing that an increase in rail service and capacity is essential to the livelihood of Canadian agriculture; (b) recognizing that the ongoing review of the Canada Transportation Act provides an opportunity to rebalance the system and improve capacity and service; (c) making sure that all sections of the industry convene, with their own operational ideas, to increase effectiveness and efficiency of our transportation system, such as increased labour, capacity, or train-cars; (d) recognizing that changes to legislation are needed to address the imbalance of power along the logistics chain; and (e) making sure that all stakeholders work together to build a world class transportation system, including effective legislation and regulations. (Private Members' Business M-550)
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 378 -- Vote no 378) - View vote details.
YEAS: 260, NAYS: 0
2015-04-20 [p.2372]
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 375 -- Vote no 375) - View vote details.
YEAS: 120, NAYS: 150
2015-04-20 [p.2374]
Pursuant to Orders made Thursday, February 26, 2015, and earlier today, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Blaney (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Ms. Bergen (Minister of State (Social Development)), — That Bill C-42, An Act to amend the Firearms Act and the Criminal Code and to make a related amendment and a consequential amendment to other Acts, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 376 -- Vote no 376) - View vote details.
YEAS: 150, NAYS: 121
Accordingly, Bill C-42, An Act to amend the Firearms Act and the Criminal Code and to make a related amendment and a consequential amendment to other Acts, was read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.
2015-04-01 [p.2340]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 370 -- Vote no 370) - View vote details.
YEAS: 134, NAYS: 122
2015-04-01 [p.2342]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Genest-Jourdain (Manicouagan), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That, in the opinion of the House, the federal government, in exercising its jurisdiction, should submit natural resource development projects to a broader consultation with First Nations and citizens in communities and urban areas affected by the establishment of such activities, and that public willingness should be a criterion in obtaining a development permit to the same degree as impacts on human health, ecosystem maintenance, employment and economic development. (Private Members' Business M-533)
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 371 -- Vote no 371) - View vote details.
YEAS: 121, NAYS: 140
2015-04-01 [p.2343]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Donnelly (New Westminster—Coquitlam), — That Bill C-628, An Act to amend the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 and the National Energy Board Act (oil transportation and pipeline certificate), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Natural Resources.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 372 -- Vote no 372) - View vote details.
YEAS: 120, NAYS: 141
2015-04-01 [p.2345]
Pursuant to Standing Order 97.1(3), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion, — That the Tenth Report of the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage (extension of time, pursuant to Standing Order 97.1, to consider Bill C-597, An Act to amend the Holidays Act (Remembrance Day)), presented on Tuesday, March 31, 2015, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 31)
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 373 -- Vote no 373) - View vote details.
YEAS: 139, NAYS: 122
2015-04-01 [p.2347]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Trudeau (Papineau), seconded by Mr. Valeriote (Guelph), — That Bill C-613, An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act and the Access to Information Act (transparency), be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 374 -- Vote no 374) - View vote details.
YEAS: 122, NAYS: 139
2015-03-30 [p.2304]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 366 -- Vote no 366) - View vote details.
YEAS: 131, NAYS: 117
Results: 1 - 100 of 479 | Page: 1 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data