Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 100 of 396
2013-06-18 [p.3432]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(11), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) for Mr. Baird (Minister of Foreign Affairs), seconded by Mr. Fantino (Minister of International Cooperation), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-06-18 [p.3433]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Baird (Minister of Foreign Affairs), seconded by Mr. Fantino (Minister of International Cooperation), — That Bill S-14, An Act to amend the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-06-18 [p.3433]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Baird (Minister of Foreign Affairs), seconded by Mr. Fantino (Minister of International Cooperation), — That Bill S-14, An Act to amend the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-06-18 [p.3438]
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-54, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the National Defence Act (mental disorder), not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration of the third reading stage of the Bill; and
that, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration of the third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the Bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.
2013-06-18 [p.3439]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 760 -- Vote no 760) - View vote details.
YEAS: 140, NAYS: 109
2013-06-18 [p.3440]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(11), Mrs. Mourani (Ahuntsic), seconded by Mr. Fortin (Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-06-18 [p.3440]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the Order was dropped to the bottom of the order of precedence on the Order Paper.
2013-06-18 [p.3441]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-54, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the National Defence Act (mental disorder), be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-06-18 [p.3441]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing or Special Order or usual practice of the House:
(a) Bill C-54, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the National Defence Act (mental disorder), be deemed read a third time and passed on division;
(b) Bill S-14, An Act to amend the Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act, be deemed read a third time and passed;
(c) Bill S-17, An Act to implement conventions, protocols, agreements and a supplementary convention, concluded between Canada and Namibia, Serbia, Poland, Hong Kong, Luxembourg and Switzerland, for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion with respect to taxes, be deemed concurred in at report stage and deemed read a third time and passed;
(d) Bill S-15, An Act to amend the Canada National Parks Act and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act and to make consequential amendments to the Canada Shipping Act, 2001, be deemed concurred in at report stage and deemed read a third time and passed;
(e) Bill C-32, An Act to amend the Civil Marriage Act, be
(i) deemed read a second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole;
(ii) deemed considered in a Committee of the Whole and reported with the following amendment: “That Bill C-32, in Clause 4, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 3 with the following: “consent, on presentation of an order from the court or a””,
(iii) deemed concurred in at report stage, as amended, and deemed read a third time and passed;
(f) Bill C-425, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (honouring the Canadian Armed Forces), be deemed reported back from the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration without amendment;
(g) in order to bring full transparency and accountability to House of Commons spending, the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs be instructed to:
(i) conduct open and public hearings with a view to replace the Board of Internal Economy with an independent oversight body,
(ii) invite the Auditor General, the Clerk and the Chief Financial Officer of the House of Commons to participate fully in these hearings,
(iii) study the practices of provincial and territorial legislatures, as well as other jurisdictions and Westminster-style Parliaments in order to compare and contrast their administrative oversight,
(iv) propose modifications to the Parliament of Canada Act, the Financial Administration Act, the Auditor General Act and any other acts as deemed necessary,
(v) propose any necessary modifications to the administrative policies and practices of the House of Commons,
(vi) examine the subject-matter of the motions, standing in the name of the Member for Papineau, placed on the Order Paper on June 10, 2013,
(vii) report its findings to the House no later than December 2, 2013, in order to have any proposed changes to expense disclosure and reporting in place for the beginning of the next fiscal year;
(h) when the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs meets pursuant to the order of reference set out in paragraph (g) of this Order, one Member who is not a member of a recognized party be allowed to participate in the hearings as a temporary, non-voting member of that Committee;
(i) on Tuesday, June 18, 2013, the House adjourn at 12 midnight or after each of Bills C-54, S-14, S-15, C-32 and S-17 have been read the third time, whichever comes first; and
(j) upon the adjournment of the House on Tuesday, June 18, 2013, the House stand adjourned until Monday, September 16, 2013, provided that, for the purposes of any Standing Order, the House be deemed to stand adjourned pursuant to Standing Order 28.
2013-06-17 [p.3418]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(11), Mr. Fletcher (Minister of State (Transport)) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-06-17 [p.3422]
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Moore (Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-49, An Act to amend the Museums Act in order to establish the Canadian Museum of History and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration at report stage of the Bill and five hours shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill; and
that, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration of the report stage and at the expiry of the five hours provided for the third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stages of the Bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.
2013-06-17 [p.3422]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 756 -- Vote no 756) - View vote details.
YEAS: 143, NAYS: 107
2013-06-17 [p.3425]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-54, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the National Defence Act (mental disorder), be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-06-17 [p.3425]
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the third reading of Bill C-54, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the National Defence Act (mental disorder).
2013-06-17 [p.3425]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-54, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the National Defence Act (mental disorder), be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-06-14 [p.3413]
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the report stage and third reading stage of Bill C-49, An Act to amend the Museums Act in order to establish the Canadian Museum of History and to make consequential amendments to other Acts.
2013-06-14 [p.3414]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer), seconded by Mr. Hayes (Sault Ste. Marie), — That Bill C-444, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (personating peace officer or public officer), be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-06-14 [p.3414]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-06-12 [p.3383]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Lizon (Mississauga East—Cooksville), seconded by Mr. Opitz (Etobicoke Centre), — That Bill C-266, An Act to establish Pope John Paul II Day, be now read a third time and do pass.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 752 -- Vote no 752) - View vote details.
YEAS: 217, NAYS: 42
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-06-11 [p.3366]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), seconded by Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give third reading to Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, because it:
(a) is primarily a Bill about the division of property on reserve but the Standing Committee on the Status of Women did not focus on this primary purpose during its deliberations;
(b) fails to implement the ministerial representative recommendation for a collaborative approach to development and implementing legislation;
(c) does not recognize First Nations jurisdiction or provide the resources necessary to implement this law;
(d) fails to provide alternative dispute resolution mechanisms at the community level;
(e) does not provide access to justice, especially in remote communities;
(f) does not deal with the need for non-legislative measures to reduce violence against Aboriginal women;
(g) makes provincial court judges responsible for adjudicating land codes for which they have had no training or experience in dealing with; and
(h) does not address underlying issues, such as access to housing and economic security that underlie the problems on-reserve in dividing matrimonial property.”.
The debate continued.
2013-06-11 [p.3367]
The question was put on the amendment and, pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the recorded division was deferred until later today, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2013-06-11 [p.3369]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, be now read a third time and do pass.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), seconded by Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give third reading to Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, because it:
(a) is primarily a Bill about the division of property on reserve but the Standing Committee on the Status of Women did not focus on this primary purpose during its deliberations;
(b) fails to implement the ministerial representative recommendation for a collaborative approach to development and implementing legislation;
(c) does not recognize First Nations jurisdiction or provide the resources necessary to implement this law;
(d) fails to provide alternative dispute resolution mechanisms at the community level;
(e) does not provide access to justice, especially in remote communities;
(f) does not deal with the need for non-legislative measures to reduce violence against Aboriginal women;
(g) makes provincial court judges responsible for adjudicating land codes for which they have had no training or experience in dealing with; and
(h) does not address underlying issues, such as access to housing and economic security that underlie the problems on-reserve in dividing matrimonial property.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 747 -- Vote no 747) - View vote details.
YEAS: 124, NAYS: 149
2013-06-11 [p.3372]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, June 4, 2013, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 748 -- Vote no 748) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 125
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-06-11 [p.3376]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(11), Mr. Lizon (Mississauga East—Cooksville), seconded by Mr. Opitz (Etobicoke Centre), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-06-11 [p.3376]
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, June 12, 2013, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2013-06-10 [p.3348]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), seconded by Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give third reading to Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, because it:
(a) is primarily a Bill about the division of property on reserve but the Standing Committee on the Status of Women did not focus on this primary purpose during its deliberations;
(b) fails to implement the ministerial representative recommendation for a collaborative approach to development and implementing legislation;
(c) does not recognize First Nations jurisdiction or provide the resources necessary to implement this law;
(d) fails to provide alternative dispute resolution mechanisms at the community level;
(e) does not provide access to justice, especially in remote communities;
(f) does not deal with the need for non-legislative measures to reduce violence against Aboriginal women;
(g) makes provincial court judges responsible for adjudicating land codes for which they have had no training or experience in dealing with; and
(h) does not address underlying issues, such as access to housing and economic security that underlie the problems on-reserve in dividing matrimonial property.”.
The debate continued.
2013-06-10 [p.3349]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. Fantino (Minister of International Cooperation), — That Bill S-8, An Act respecting the safety of drinking water on First Nation lands, be now read a third time and do pass.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 742 -- Vote no 742) - View vote details.
YEAS: 165, NAYS: 115
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-06-10 [p.3350]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Fletcher (Minister of State (Transport)), — That Bill C-60, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, be now read a third time and do pass.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“this House decline to give third reading to Bill C-60, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, because it:
“(a) weakens Canadians' confidence in the work of Parliament, decreases transparency and erodes the democratic process by amending 49 different pieces of legislation, many of which are not related to budgetary measures;
(b) raises taxes on Canadians by introducing tax hikes on credit unions and small businesses;
(c) gives the Treasury Board sweeping powers to interfere in collective bargaining and impose employment conditions on non-union employees;
(d) amends the Investment Canada Act to triple review thresholds and dramatically reduces the number of foreign takeovers subject to review;
(e) proposes an inadequate Band-Aid fix for the flawed approach to labour market opinions in the temporary foreign worker program;
(f) proposes to increase fees for visitor visas for friends and family coming to visit Canada; and
(g) fails to provide substantive measures to create good Canadian jobs and stimulate meaningful long-term growth and recovery.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 743 -- Vote no 743) - View vote details.
YEAS: 119, NAYS: 153
2013-06-10 [p.3353]
Pursuant to Order made Monday, June 3, 2013, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 744 -- Vote no 744) - View vote details.
YEAS: 153, NAYS: 119
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-06-10 [p.3362]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), seconded by Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give third reading to Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, because it:
(a) is primarily a Bill about the division of property on reserve but the Standing Committee on the Status of Women did not focus on this primary purpose during its deliberations;
(b) fails to implement the ministerial representative recommendation for a collaborative approach to development and implementing legislation;
(c) does not recognize First Nations jurisdiction or provide the resources necessary to implement this law;
(d) fails to provide alternative dispute resolution mechanisms at the community level;
(e) does not provide access to justice, especially in remote communities;
(f) does not deal with the need for non-legislative measures to reduce violence against Aboriginal women;
(g) makes provincial court judges responsible for adjudicating land codes for which they have had no training or experience in dealing with; and
(h) does not address underlying issues, such as access to housing and economic security that underlie the problems on-reserve in dividing matrimonial property.”.
The debate continued.
2013-06-07 [p.3337]
The Order was read for the third reading of Bill C-60, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures.
Mr. Oliver (Minister of Natural Resources) for Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Fletcher (Minister of State (Transport)), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-06-07 [p.3337]
Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“this House decline to give third reading to Bill C-60, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, because it:
“(a) weakens Canadians' confidence in the work of Parliament, decreases transparency and erodes the democratic process by amending 49 different pieces of legislation, many of which are not related to budgetary measures;
(b) raises taxes on Canadians by introducing tax hikes on credit unions and small businesses;
(c) gives the Treasury Board sweeping powers to interfere in collective bargaining and impose employment conditions on non-union employees;
(d) amends the Investment Canada Act to triple review thresholds and dramatically reduces the number of foreign takeovers subject to review;
(e) proposes an inadequate Band-Aid fix for the flawed approach to labour market opinions in the temporary foreign worker program;
(f) proposes to increase fees for visitor visas for friends and family coming to visit Canada; and
(g) fails to provide substantive measures to create good Canadian jobs and stimulate meaningful long-term growth and recovery.”.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-06-07 [p.3342]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Fletcher (Minister of State (Transport)), — That Bill C-60, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“this House decline to give third reading to Bill C-60, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, because it:
“(a) weakens Canadians' confidence in the work of Parliament, decreases transparency and erodes the democratic process by amending 49 different pieces of legislation, many of which are not related to budgetary measures;
(b) raises taxes on Canadians by introducing tax hikes on credit unions and small businesses;
(c) gives the Treasury Board sweeping powers to interfere in collective bargaining and impose employment conditions on non-union employees;
(d) amends the Investment Canada Act to triple review thresholds and dramatically reduces the number of foreign takeovers subject to review;
(e) proposes an inadequate Band-Aid fix for the flawed approach to labour market opinions in the temporary foreign worker program;
(f) proposes to increase fees for visitor visas for friends and family coming to visit Canada; and
(g) fails to provide substantive measures to create good Canadian jobs and stimulate meaningful long-term growth and recovery.”.
The debate continued.
2013-06-07 [p.3343]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Fletcher (Minister of State (Transport)), — That Bill C-60, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Ms. Nash (Parkdale—High Park), seconded by Mrs. Groguhé (Saint-Lambert), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“this House decline to give third reading to Bill C-60, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, because it:
“(a) weakens Canadians' confidence in the work of Parliament, decreases transparency and erodes the democratic process by amending 49 different pieces of legislation, many of which are not related to budgetary measures;
(b) raises taxes on Canadians by introducing tax hikes on credit unions and small businesses;
(c) gives the Treasury Board sweeping powers to interfere in collective bargaining and impose employment conditions on non-union employees;
(d) amends the Investment Canada Act to triple review thresholds and dramatically reduces the number of foreign takeovers subject to review;
(e) proposes an inadequate Band-Aid fix for the flawed approach to labour market opinions in the temporary foreign worker program;
(f) proposes to increase fees for visitor visas for friends and family coming to visit Canada; and
(g) fails to provide substantive measures to create good Canadian jobs and stimulate meaningful long-term growth and recovery.”.
The debate continued.
2013-06-07 [p.3344]
At 1:15 p.m., pursuant to Order made Monday, June 3, 2013, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings.
2013-06-07 [p.3344]
The question was put on the amendment and, pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the recorded division was deferred until Monday, June 10, 2013, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2013-06-06 [p.3329]
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), moved, — That, in relation to Bill S-8, An Act respecting the safety of drinking water on First Nation lands, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration of the third reading stage of the Bill; and
that, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration of the third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the Bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.
2013-06-06 [p.3329]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 740 -- Vote no 740) - View vote details.
YEAS: 150, NAYS: 115
2013-06-06 [p.3333]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. Fantino (Minister of International Cooperation), — That Bill S-8, An Act respecting the safety of drinking water on First Nation lands, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-06-06 [p.3334]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. Fantino (Minister of International Cooperation), — That Bill S-8, An Act respecting the safety of drinking water on First Nation lands, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-06-06 [p.3334]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-62, An Act to give effect to the Yale First Nation Final Agreement and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be deemed concurred in at report stage and deemed read a third time and passed.
2013-06-06 [p.3334]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. Fantino (Minister of International Cooperation), — That Bill S-8, An Act respecting the safety of drinking water on First Nation lands, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-06-06 [p.3334]
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the recorded division was deferred until Monday, June 10, 2013, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2013-06-05 [p.3299]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Benskin (Jeanne-Le Ber), — That Bill C-419, An Act respecting language skills, be now read a third time and do pass.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 727 -- Vote no 727) - View vote details.
YEAS: 271, NAYS: 0
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-06-05 [p.3301]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), seconded by Mr. Scarpaleggia (Lac-Saint-Louis), — That Bill S-209, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (prize fights), be now read a third time and do pass.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 728 -- Vote no 728) - View vote details.
YEAS: 267, NAYS: 9
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-06-05 [p.3307]
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the third reading of Bill S-8, An Act respecting the safety of drinking water on First Nation lands.
2013-06-05 [p.3316]
Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
2013-06-05 [p.3316]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 735 -- Vote no 735) - View vote details.
YEAS: 153, NAYS: 126
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-06-05 [p.3323]
Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
2013-06-05 [p.3323]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 739 -- Vote no 739) - View vote details.
YEAS: 153, NAYS: 126
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-06-04 [p.3266]
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), moved, — That, in relation to Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration of the third reading stage of the Bill; and
that, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration of the third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the Bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.
2013-06-04 [p.3266]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 711 -- Vote no 711) - View vote details.
YEAS: 145, NAYS: 126
2013-06-04 [p.3268]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), seconded by Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give third reading to Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, because it:
(a) is primarily a Bill about the division of property on reserve but the Standing Committee on the Status of Women did not focus on this primary purpose during its deliberations;
(b) fails to implement the ministerial representative recommendation for a collaborative approach to development and implementing legislation;
(c) does not recognize First Nations jurisdiction or provide the resources necessary to implement this law;
(d) fails to provide alternative dispute resolution mechanisms at the community level;
(e) does not provide access to justice, especially in remote communities;
(f) does not deal with the need for non-legislative measures to reduce violence against Aboriginal women;
(g) makes provincial court judges responsible for adjudicating land codes for which they have had no training or experience in dealing with; and
(h) does not address underlying issues, such as access to housing and economic security that underlie the problems on-reserve in dividing matrimonial property.”.
The debate continued.
2013-06-04 [p.3269]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), seconded by Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give third reading to Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, because it:
(a) is primarily a Bill about the division of property on reserve but the Standing Committee on the Status of Women did not focus on this primary purpose during its deliberations;
(b) fails to implement the ministerial representative recommendation for a collaborative approach to development and implementing legislation;
(c) does not recognize First Nations jurisdiction or provide the resources necessary to implement this law;
(d) fails to provide alternative dispute resolution mechanisms at the community level;
(e) does not provide access to justice, especially in remote communities;
(f) does not deal with the need for non-legislative measures to reduce violence against Aboriginal women;
(g) makes provincial court judges responsible for adjudicating land codes for which they have had no training or experience in dealing with; and
(h) does not address underlying issues, such as access to housing and economic security that underlie the problems on-reserve in dividing matrimonial property.”.
The debate continued.
2013-06-04 [p.3296]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(11), Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. Fantino (Minister of International Cooperation), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-06-03 [p.3247]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(11), Mr. Calkins (Wetaskiwin), seconded by Mr. Hawn (Edmonton Centre), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-06-03 [p.3247]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-06-03 [p.3248]
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Oliver (Minister of Natural Resources), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-60, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures, not more than one further sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at report stage of the Bill and one sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill; and
that, 15 minutes before the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on the day allotted to the consideration at report stage and on the day allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the stage of the Bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and successively without further debate or amendment.
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.
2013-06-03 [p.3248]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 709 -- Vote no 709) - View vote details.
YEAS: 148, NAYS: 104
2013-06-03 [p.3254]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Toews (Minister of Public Safety), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-51, An Act to amend the Witness Protection Program Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, be now read a third time and do pass.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 710 -- Vote no 710) - View vote details.
YEAS: 268, NAYS: 0
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-05-31 [p.3244]
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the report stage and third reading stage of Bill C-60, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 21, 2013 and other measures.
2013-05-31 [p.3244]
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the third reading of Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves.
2013-05-31 [p.3245]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(11), Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer), seconded by Mr. Hayes (Sault Ste. Marie), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-05-31 [p.3245]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the Order was dropped to the bottom of the order of precedence on the Order Paper.
2013-05-30 [p.3227]
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Toews (Minister of Public Safety), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-51, An Act to amend the Witness Protection Program Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, not more than one further sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration of the third reading stage of the Bill; and
that, 15 minutes before the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on the day allotted to the consideration of the third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the Bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.
2013-05-30 [p.3227]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 707 -- Vote no 707) - View vote details.
YEAS: 145, NAYS: 108
2013-05-30 [p.3229]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Toews (Minister of Public Safety), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-51, An Act to amend the Witness Protection Program Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-05-30 [p.3229]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Lebel (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities), seconded by Mr. Kent (Minister of the Environment), — That Bill C-52, An Act to amend the Canada Transportation Act (administration, air and railway transportation and arbitration), be now read a third time and do pass.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 708 -- Vote no 708) - View vote details.
YEAS: 255, NAYS: 0
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-05-30 [p.3231]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Toews (Minister of Public Safety), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-51, An Act to amend the Witness Protection Program Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-05-30 [p.3231]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), seconded by Mr. Scarpaleggia (Lac-Saint-Louis), — That Bill S-209, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (prize fights), be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-05-30 [p.3231]
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, June 5, 2013, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2013-05-30 [p.3231]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Toews (Minister of Public Safety), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-51, An Act to amend the Witness Protection Program Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-05-30 [p.3231]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Toews (Minister of Public Safety), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-51, An Act to amend the Witness Protection Program Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-05-31 [p.3232]
At 12:22 a.m., pursuant to Order made Thursday, May 30, 2013, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the Speaker interrupted the proceedings.
2013-05-31 [p.3232]
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the recorded division was deferred until Monday, June 3, 2013, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2013-05-29 [p.3209]
Pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-48, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Excise Tax Act, the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act, the First Nations Goods and Services Tax Act and related legislation, be now read a third time and do pass.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 702 -- Vote no 702) - View vote details.
YEAS: 277, NAYS: 1
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2013-05-29 [p.3221]
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Lebel (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec, Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-52, An Act to amend the Canada Transportation Act (administration, air and railway transportation and arbitration), not more than one further sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration of the third reading stage of the Bill; and
that, 15 minutes before the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on the day allotted to the consideration of the third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the Bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.
2013-05-29 [p.3221]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 706 -- Vote no 706) - View vote details.
YEAS: 153, NAYS: 117
2013-05-29 [p.3223]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Latendresse (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Benskin (Jeanne-Le Ber), — That Bill C-419, An Act respecting language skills, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-05-29 [p.3223]
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, June 5, 2013, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2013-05-29 [p.3223]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Lebel (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities), seconded by Mr. Kent (Minister of the Environment), — That Bill C-52, An Act to amend the Canada Transportation Act (administration, air and railway transportation and arbitration), be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-05-29 [p.3223]
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the third reading of Bill C-51, An Act to amend the Witness Protection Program Act and to make a consequential amendment to another Act.
2013-05-29 [p.3223]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Lebel (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities), seconded by Mr. Kent (Minister of the Environment), — That Bill C-52, An Act to amend the Canada Transportation Act (administration, air and railway transportation and arbitration), be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-05-30 [p.3224]
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the recorded division was deferred until later today, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2013-05-28 [p.3195]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-48, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Excise Tax Act, the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act, the First Nations Goods and Services Tax Act and related legislation, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-05-28 [p.3200]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-48, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Excise Tax Act, the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act, the First Nations Goods and Services Tax Act and related legislation, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-05-28 [p.3200]
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Order made Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, May 29, 2013, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2013-05-28 [p.3201]
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the third reading of Bill C-52, An Act to amend the Canada Transportation Act (administration, air and railway transportation and arbitration).
2013-05-27 [p.3181]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(11), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) for Mr. Valcourt (Minister of Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-05-27 [p.3181]
Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), seconded by Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give third reading to Bill S-2, An Act respecting family homes situated on First Nation reserves and matrimonial interests or rights in or to structures and lands situated on those reserves, because it:
(a) is primarily a Bill about the division of property on reserve but the Standing Committee on the Status of Women did not focus on this primary purpose during its deliberations;
(b) fails to implement the ministerial representative recommendation for a collaborative approach to development and implementing legislation;
(c) does not recognize First Nations jurisdiction or provide the resources necessary to implement this law;
(d) fails to provide alternative dispute resolution mechanisms at the community level;
(e) does not provide access to justice, especially in remote communities;
(f) does not deal with the need for non-legislative measures to reduce violence against Aboriginal women;
(g) makes provincial court judges responsible for adjudicating land codes for which they have had no training or experience in dealing with; and
(h) does not address underlying issues, such as access to housing and economic security that underlie the problems on-reserve in dividing matrimonial property.”.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-05-27 [p.3185]
Notice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Mrs. Shea (Minister of National Revenue and Minister for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency), seconded by Mr. Toews (Minister of Public Safety), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-48, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Excise Tax Act, the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act, the First Nations Goods and Services Tax Act and related legislation, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the consideration of the third reading stage of the Bill; and
that, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration of the third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the Bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.
Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.
2013-05-27 [p.3185]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 696 -- Vote no 696) - View vote details.
YEAS: 144, NAYS: 110
2013-05-27 [p.3188]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), — That Bill C-48, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Excise Tax Act, the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act, the First Nations Goods and Services Tax Act and related legislation, be now read a third time and do pass.
The debate continued.
2013-05-24 [p.3177]
Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the third reading of Bill C-48, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act, the Excise Tax Act, the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act, the First Nations Goods and Services Tax Act and related legislation.
2013-05-23 [p.3169]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(11), Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State) for Mr. Lebel (Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities), seconded by Mr. Kent (Minister of the Environment), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Debate arose thereon.
2013-05-23 [p.3171]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(11), Mr. Toews (Minister of Public Safety), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Debate arose thereon.
Results: 1 - 100 of 396 | Page: 1 of 4

1
2
3
4
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data