Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 7 of 7
2020-11-02 [p.201]
Pursuant to Standing Order 83(3), the question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 16 -- Vote no 16) - View vote details.
YEAS: 322, NAYS: 0
2020-02-21 [p.251]
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 16 -- Vote no 16) - View vote details.
YEAS: 45, NAYS: 74
2016-03-07 [p.225]
Pursuant to Order made Thursday, February 25, 2016, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Mihychuk (Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Labour), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Minister of Small Business and Tourism), — That Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Deltell (Louis-Saint-Laurent), seconded by Mr. Barlow (Foothills), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-4, An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act, since the bill violates a fundamental principle of democracy by abolishing the provision that the certification and decertification of a bargaining agent must be achieved by a secret ballot vote-based majority.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 16 -- Vote no 16) - View vote details.
YEAS: 91, NAYS: 220
2013-11-26 [p.208]
Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Ambrose (Minister of Health), seconded by Mrs. Yelich (Minister of State (Foreign Affairs and Consular)), — That Bill C-2, An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Ms. Davies (Vancouver East), seconded by Ms. Morin (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“this house decline to give second reading to Bill C-2, an Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, because it:
(a) fails to reflect the dual purposes of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) to maintain and promote both public health and public safety;
(b) runs counter to the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Canada v. PHS Community Services Society, which states that a Minister should generally grant an exemption when there is proof that a supervised injection site will decrease the risk of death and disease, and when there is little or no evidence that it will have a negative impact on public safety;
(c) establishes onerous requirements for applicants that will create unjustified barriers for the establishment of safe injection sites, which are proven to save lives and increase health outcomes; and
(d) further advances the Minister's political tactics to divide communities and use the issue of supervised injection sites for political gain, in place of respecting the advice and opinion of public health experts.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 16 -- Vote no 16) - View vote details.
YEAS: 125, NAYS: 147
2011-06-22 [p.142]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 16 -- Vote no 16) - View vote details.
YEAS: 156, NAYS: 137
(See list under Division No. 14)
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
2010-03-23 [p.125]
Pursuant to Order made Thursday, March 18, 2010, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Généreux (Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup), seconded by Mr. Armstrong (Cumberland—Colchester—Musquodoboit Valley), — That the following Address be presented to Her Excellency the Governor General of Canada:
To Her Excellency the Right Honourable Michaëlle Jean, Chancellor and Principal Companion of the Order of Canada, Chancellor and Commander of the Order of Military Merit, Chancellor and Commander of the Order of Merit of the Police Forces, Governor General and Commander-in-Chief of Canada.
MAY IT PLEASE YOUR EXCELLENCY:
We, Her Majesty's most loyal and dutiful subjects, the House of Commons of Canada, in Parliament assembled, beg leave to offer our humble thanks to Your Excellency for the gracious Speech which Your Excellency has addressed to both Houses of Parliament;
And of the amendment of Mr. Ignatieff (Etobicoke—Lakeshore), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Wascana), — That the motion be amended by adding the following:
“and offers our humble wish that your Excellency is not burdened in future with frivolous requests for prorogation”;
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the subamendment of Mr. Duceppe (Laurier—Sainte-Marie), seconded by Mr. Paquette (Joliette), — That the amendment be amended by adding the following after the word “prorogation”:
“that aim to prevent the opposition from asking legitimate questions on major issues such as Canada’s unacceptable position at the Copenhagen Climate Change Conference, the fate of Afghan detainees and the ineffective measures in the government’s economic action plan to help Quebec's economy weather this crisis”.
The question was put on the subamendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 16 -- Vote no 16) - View vote details.
YEAS: 78, NAYS: 178
2009-03-03 [p.192]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 2 of Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel), seconded by Mr. Malo (Verchères—Les Patriotes), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 295.
The question was put on Motion No. 2 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 16 -- Vote no 16) - View vote details.
YEAS: 81, NAYS: 209
Accordingly, Motions Nos. 3 to 6 were also negatived on the same division.
Results: 1 - 7 of 7

Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data