Journals
 
 
 
RSS feed based on search criteria Export search results - CSV (plain text) Export search results - XML
Add search criteria
2019-08-21 [p.5751]
— Nos. 421-04146, 421-04664 and 421-04849 concerning environmental pollution. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-220-04;
2019-06-20 [p.5727]
— by Mr. Godin (Portneuf—Jacques-Cartier), one concerning environmental pollution (No. 421-04849) and one concerning telecommunications (No. 421-04850);
2019-06-19 [p.5702]
— by Mr. Johns (Courtenay—Alberni), two concerning the pension system (Nos. 421-04658 and 421-04659), one concerning Old Age Security benefits (No. 421-04660), one concerning road transportation (No. 421-04661), two concerning the protection of the environment (Nos. 421-04662 and 421-04663), one concerning environmental pollution (No. 421-04664), one concerning international development and aid (No. 421-04665) and four concerning health care services (Nos. 421-04666 to 421-04669);
2019-06-05 [p.5449]
— by Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), one concerning environmental pollution (No. 421-04146) and one concerning veterans' affairs (No. 421-04147).
2019-04-05 [p.5080]
— No. 421-03237 concerning plain language labelling. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-239-01;
2019-03-18 [p.4681]
— No. 421-03160 concerning tobacco. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-153-04;
2019-02-20 [p.4594]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Mr. Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie), Bill C-429, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (packaging), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2019-02-20 [p.4595]
— by Mr. Blaikie (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning plain language labelling (No. 421-03237);
2019-01-31 [p.4546]
— by Mr. Iacono (Alfred-Pellan), one concerning tobacco (No. 421-03160);
2019-01-28 [p.4495]
— No. 421-03056 concerning alcoholic beverages. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-162-02;
2018-12-07 [p.4430]
— by Mr. Iacono (Alfred-Pellan), one concerning alcoholic beverages (No. 421-03056);
2018-11-22 [p.4309]
— No. 421-02738 concerning tobacco. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-153-03;
2018-10-15 [p.4062]
— by Mr. Iacono (Alfred-Pellan), one concerning tobacco (No. 421-02738);
2018-09-17 [p.3951]
Q-1880 — Mr. Barlow (Foothills) — With regard to the Minister of Health: (a) what are the details of all memorandums or briefing notes on the front of package regulations, including (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) title, (v) summary, (vi) file number, (vii) position on front of package proposal (i.e. supportive or opposed); (b) what are the peer-reviewed scientific studies and analyses used in the consideration of the proposed regulation, broken down by (i) title of article, (ii) date of publication, (iii) author; (c) what does the government estimate as the annual cost for the next two, five and 10 years to the industry to implement these changes, broken down by sector, including (i) primary agriculture, (ii) meat processors, (iii) seafood processors, (iv) dairy producers, (v) chicken farmers and processors, (vi) turkey farmers and producers, (vii) corn farmers and producers, (viii) soy farmers and producers (ix) sugar beat farmers and producers; (d) by what percentage in the next five, ten, twenty and forty years is the government expecting a reduction of 2018 rates of the following health concerns due to front of package labelling, (i) heart disease, (ii) obesity rates, (iii) diabetes, (iv) cancers; and (e) what are the details of all correspondence by foreign government on front of package labelling, broken down by (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) title, (v) summary, (vi) file number (vii) position on front of package proposal (i.e. supportive or opposed)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1880.
2018-04-23 [p.3131]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Masse (Windsor West), seconded by Mr. Rankin (Victoria), Bill C-400, An Act to amend the Textile Labelling Act (animal skin, hair and fur), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2017-09-18 [p.2087]
— No. 421-01412 concerning the labelling of food products. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-105-02;
2017-09-18 [p.2087]
— No. 421-01483 concerning hazardous products. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-51-02;
2017-06-09 [p.1897]
— by Mr. Thériault (Montcalm), one concerning hazardous products (No. 421-01483);
2017-05-31 [p.1805]
— by Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway), one concerning the labelling of food products (No. 421-01412) and one concerning marine transportation (No. 421-01413);
2017-01-18 [p.1216]
— No. 421-00872 concerning the labelling of food products. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-105-01;
2016-11-14 [p.1005]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning the labelling of food products (No. 421-00872);
2016-07-20 [p.694]
— by Mr. LeBlanc (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:
— No. 421-00238 concerning hazardous products. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-51-01;
2016-06-14 [p.603]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), seconded by Mr. Barlow (Foothills), Bill C-290, An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (machine-readable code), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2016-04-22 [p.378]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lametti (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade) laid upon the Table, — Copy of the Protocol to the 2007 World Wine Trade Group Agreement on Requirements for Wine Labelling concerning Alcohol Tolerance, Vintage, Variety, and Wine Regions, and Explanatory Memorandum, dated March 22, 2013. — Sessional Paper No. 8532-421-10.
2015-06-05 [p.2643]
— by Mr. Benskin (Jeanne-Le Ber), one concerning tobacco (No. 412-5862), one concerning the economy (No. 412-5863) and one concerning hazardous products (No. 412-5864);
2014-06-09 [p.1215]
— No. 412-2635 concerning hazardous products. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-412-42-04;
2014-05-05 [p.879]
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning the Canada Post Corporation (No. 412-2634) and one concerning hazardous products (No. 412-2635);
2014-01-27 [p.418]
Q-153 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — With regard to imported spent fowl products: (a) how many Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) agents are trained to identify the difference between spent fowl and other chicken products which are imported; (b) how many Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) staff are trained to identify the difference between spent fowl and other chicken products which are imported; (c) what tests do CFIA or CBSA staff carry out to distinguish between spent fowl and imported chicken meat; (d) how many kilograms of spent fowl were imported into Canada in (i) 2009, (ii) 2010, (iii) 2011, (iv) 2012; (e) how many kilograms of spent fowl were imported into Canada, from the United States in (i) 2009, (ii) 2010, (iii) 2011, (iv) 2012; (f) how many kilograms of spent fowl were imported into Ontario from the United States in (i) 2009, (ii) 2010, (iii) 2011, (iv) 2012; and (g) what plans does Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada currently have to change the labelling of spent fowl to distinguish it from other chicken products? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-153.
2013-06-07 [p.3341]
— by Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), one concerning the mining industry (No. 411-4107);
2013-05-31 [p.3239]
— by Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), one concerning Old Age Security benefits (No. 411-3999) and two concerning genetic engineering (Nos. 411-4000 and 411-4001);
2013-05-30 [p.3226]
— by Mr. Lamoureux (Winnipeg North), one concerning the mining industry (No. 411-3988);
2013-05-09 [p.3123]
Q-1255 — Ms. Brosseau (Berthier—Maskinongé) — With regard to the repeal of regulations related to container standards announced in Budget 2011: (a) when exactly will these changes be made; (b) what is the consultation process for making these changes; (c) how much time is scheduled for each step of the process; (d) in his testimony before the AGRI committee on February 28, 2013, the Minister of Agriculture said that some industries can choose not to adopt the regulatory changes, what does this mean for foreign products that do not meet Canadian sizes; (e) are there plans to set aside funds to upgrade equipment (for example, to package the previously non-standard new containers) so that manufacturing companies can remain competitive; (f) what industries were consulted to determine whether the regulations should be repealed; (g) what are the reasons for repealing regulations related to container standards; (h) what industries, groups, stakeholders or companies called for the repeal of regulations related to container standards; (i) are there studies or reports on the economic impact of repealing these regulations and, if so, what are they; (j) will there be changes for requesting and administering ministerial exemptions and, if so, what are they; (k) were analyses done to determine how repealing regulations related to container standards could improve inter-provincial trade; (l) are there expected to be savings or extra costs for Canadian food processors following the repeal of regulations related to container standards and, if so, what kind; (m) are there expected to be savings or extra costs for consumers following the repeal of regulations related to container standards and, if so, what kind; and (n) are there expected to be savings or extra costs for farmers following the repeal of regulations related to container standards and, if so, what kind? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-1255.
2013-05-08 [p.3108]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Van Loan (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Answer to question Q-1255 on the Order Paper. — Sessional Paper No. 8530-411-39.
2013-05-06 [p.3086]
Q-1242 — Mr. Choquette (Drummond) — With regard to the Customs Tariff: (a) how many complaints were there from March 1, 2012, to March 1, 2013, concerning agricultural products; (b) how many complaints were there concerning Chapter 63; (c) how many complaints were there concerning mesh bags under HS code 6305.32.00; (d) what measures did the government take to address the concerns raised by these complaints; (e) is the government planning to review the Customs Tariff; (f) are small businesses that do not have access to a specialized bagging machinery serial number in the Customs Tariff penalized; and (g) are small businesses that do not have the machinery required in the tax exemption forms subject to financial consequences? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-1242.
2013-01-28 [p.2664]
Q-1084 — Mr. Allen (Welland) — With regard to the Budget 2012 commitment to “repeal regulations related to container standards” on various foods: (a) what market impact studies were completed at the time of this commitment and what were those projected impacts; (b) what were the projected impacts on consumers from this commitment; (c) what were the projected impacts on farmers from this commitments; (d) what were the projected impacts on Canadian food processers affected by this commitment; (e) how many hours have been spent, broken down by month, since January 1, 2011, tracking down container standard size violations in (i) baby food packaging, (ii) pre-packaged meat packaging, (iii) honey packaging, (iv) maple syrup packaging, (v) fruits and vegetable packaging; and (f) what has been the cost to the government, broken down by month since January 1, 2011, of tracking down container standard size violations in (i) baby food packaging, (ii) pre-packaged meat packaging, (iii) honey packaging, (iv) maple syrup packaging, (v) fruits and vegetable packaging? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-1084.
2012-09-17 [p.1917]
— No. 411-1445 concerning the fur industry. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-62-05;
2012-06-20 [p.1878]
— by Ms. Davies (Vancouver East), one concerning the fishing industry (No. 411-1444), one concerning the fur industry (No. 411-1445) and one concerning Old Age Security benefits (No. 411-1446);
2012-06-01 [p.1365]
— by Mr. McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood), one concerning the mining industry (No. 411-1208);
2012-01-30 [p.708]
Q-294 — Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — With respect to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and its responsibilities for the administration of the food labelling, packaging and advertising policies under the Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act: (a) what is the total number, for each of the fiscal years from 2005-2006 to 2011-2012, across Canada as a whole and broken down by province, of (i) inspectors at the CFIA, (ii) newly hired inspectors at the CFIA, (iii) inspectors who retired from the CFIA, (iv) employees assigned to the CFIA Process, Formulation and Label Registration Unit; (b) what is the total number, for each of the fiscal years from 2005-2006 to 2011-2012, across Canada as a whole and broken down by province, of inspections conducted by a CFIA inspector of a product at a dealer, broken down by (i) retailer, (ii) manufacturer, (iii) processor, (iv) producer, (v) business engaged in importing any product, (vi) business engaged in packing any product, (vii) business engaged in selling any product; (c) for the answer to each part of (b), was the inspection at (i) a site randomly selected, (ii) a site in which the inspection was pre-arranged with any of the individuals or groups identified in (b); (d) for the answer to each part of (c), was the reason for the inspection related to (i) misleading advertising or labelling of exaggerated or unproven nutrition and health claims, (ii) misleading labelling information of the country of origin claims; (e) for the answer to each part of (b), (c) and (d), how many, (i) products or any labelling, packaging or advertising materials were seized and detained by the inspectors, (ii) cases of non-compliance were identified during inspections; (f) for the answer to each part of (e), how many inspections lead to (i) the prosecution of an individual, (ii) the prosecution of a dealer, (iii) a summary conviction or a conviction on indictments of an individual with a fine, (iv) a summary conviction or a conviction on indictments of a dealer with a fine, (v) a summary conviction or a conviction on indictments of an individual with a prison term? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-294.
2011-06-22 [p.134]
Mrs. Smith (Kildonan—St. Paul), from the Standing Committee on Health, presented the First Report of the Committee (proposed tobacco regulations). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-411-5.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 3) was tabled.
2010-06-09 [p.486]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mrs. Aglukkaq (Minister of Health), seconded by Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), Bill C-36, An Act respecting the safety of consumer products, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act respecting the safety of consumer products”.
2009-05-26 [p.519]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) for Mrs. Aglukkaq (Minister of Health), seconded by Mrs. Yelich (Minister of State (Western Economic Diversification)), Bill C-32, An Act to amend the Tobacco Act, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2009-03-26 [p.317]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North), seconded by Ms. Leslie (Halifax), Bill C-348, An Act to amend the Tobacco Act (cigarillos, cigars and pipe tobacco), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2009-03-24 [p.286]
Pursuant to Standing Order 69(2), on motion of Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State) for Ms. Raitt (Minister of Natural Resources), seconded by Ms. Oda (Minister of International Cooperation), Bill S-3, An Act to amend the Energy Efficiency Act, was read the first time and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2009-02-04 [p.86]
— by Mrs. Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine), one concerning the textile industry (No. 402-0044);
2009-01-29 [p.58]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mrs. Aglukkaq (Minister of Health), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), Bill C-6, An Act respecting the safety of consumer products, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act respecting the safety of consumer products”.
2009-01-29 [p.59]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mrs. Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine), seconded by Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest), Bill C-271, An Act to amend the Textile Labelling Act, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
Results: 1 - 52 of 52