Journals
 
 
 
RSS feed based on search criteria Export search results - CSV (plain text) Export search results - XML
Add search criteria
2019-08-21 [p.5750]
— Nos. 421-04081, 421-04347, 421-04453, 421-04498, 421-04523, 421-04524, 421-04525, 421-04526, 421-04527, 421-04528, 421-04529, 421-04530, 421-04531, 421-04532, 421-04533, 421-04534, 421-04535, 421-04536, 421-04682 and 421-04842 concerning federal-provincial agreements. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-245-05;
2019-07-17 [p.5742]
— Nos. 421-03705, 421-03736 and 421-04863 concerning federal-provincial agreements. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-245-04;
2019-06-20 [p.5727]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning federal-provincial agreements (No. 421-04842);
2019-06-19 [p.5697]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:
— No. 421-03602 concerning federal-provincial agreements. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-245-03;
2019-06-19 [p.5702]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning federal-provincial agreements (No. 421-04682);
2019-06-18 [p.5673]
— No. 421-03743 concerning waste management. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-35-09;
2019-06-17 [p.5654]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning federal-provincial agreements (No. 421-04498);
2019-06-14 [p.5588]
— No. 421-03495 concerning federal-provincial agreements. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-245-02;
2019-06-12 [p.5542]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning federal-provincial agreements (No. 421-04453);
2019-06-10 [p.5514]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning federal-provincial agreements (No. 421-04347);
2019-06-05 [p.5448]
— by Mr. Paradis (Brome—Missisquoi), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-04112);
2019-06-03 [p.5406]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning federal-provincial agreements (No. 421-04081);
2019-05-27 [p.5333]
— No. 421-03379 concerning federal-provincial agreements. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-245-01;
2019-05-27 [p.5333]
— Nos. 421-03388, 421-03404 and 421-03437 concerning the protection of the environment. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-3-75;
2019-05-14 [p.5295]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning federal-provincial agreements (No. 421-03736);
2019-05-14 [p.5296]
— by Mr. Paradis (Brome—Missisquoi), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-03741);
2019-05-14 [p.5296]
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning waste management (No. 421-03743);
2019-05-13 [p.5290]
— by Mr. Paradis (Brome—Missisquoi), two concerning the protection of the environment (Nos. 421-03720 and 421-03721);
2019-05-10 [p.5282]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning federal-provincial agreements (No. 421-03705);
2019-05-09 [p.5278]
— by Mr. Paradis (Brome—Missisquoi), two concerning the protection of the environment (Nos. 421-03700 and 421-03701);
2019-05-07 [p.5242]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning federal-provincial agreements (No. 421-03602);
2019-05-01 [p.5206]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning sexual misconduct (No. 421-03493), one concerning immigration (No. 421-03494) and one concerning federal-provincial agreements (No. 421-03495);
2019-04-29 [p.5179]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:
— No. 421-03277 concerning environmental assessment and review. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-118-04;
2019-04-10 [p.5129]
— by Ms. Rempel (Calgary Nose Hill), one concerning federal-provincial agreements (No. 421-03379);
2019-04-10 [p.5129]
— by Ms. Benson (Saskatoon West), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-03388) and one concerning the grain industry (No. 421-03389);
2019-03-19 [p.4709]
— No. 421-03200 concerning waste management. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-35-08;
2019-03-18 [p.4681]
— No. 421-03129 concerning waste management. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-35-07;
2019-02-28 [p.4667]
— by Mr. Warkentin (Grande Prairie—Mackenzie), one concerning environmental assessment and review (No. 421-03277);
2019-02-06 [p.4566]
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning waste management (No. 421-03200);
2019-01-29 [p.4531]
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning waste management (No. 421-03129) and one concerning organ transplants (No. 421-03130).
2018-12-06 [p.4422]
— No. 421-02885 concerning waste management. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-35-06;
2018-11-05 [p.4223]
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning waste management (No. 421-02885);
2018-09-17 [p.3920]
— No. 421-02458 concerning air transportation. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-132-04;
2018-09-17 [p.3928]
Q-1769 — Mr. Stetski (Kootenay—Columbia) — With regard to the impacts of the Kinder Morgan pipeline project on Canada’s National Parks and Marine Conservation Areas: (a) what analysis has the government undertaken of the potential impacts of the Kinder Morgan pipeline project on Canada’s National Parks and Marine Conservation Areas, and what were the results of this analysis; (b) what plans does the government have in place to address and mitigate the impacts of the Kinder Morgan pipeline project on Canada’s National Parks and Marine Conservation Areas; (c) what analysis has the government undertaken of the potential impacts of a potential spill of bitumen from the Kinder Morgan pipeline project in Jasper National Park, and what were the results of this analysis; (d) what plans does the government have in place to address and mitigate the impacts of any spills of bitumen from the Kinder Morgan pipeline project in Canada’s National Parks, including in Jasper National Park; (e) what analysis has the government undertaken of the potential impacts of the Kinder Morgan pipeline project on the water supply in National Parks and Marine Conservation Areas, and what were the results of this analysis; (f) what plans does the government have in place to address and mitigate the impacts of the Kinder Morgan pipeline project on the water supply in National Parks and Marine Conservation Areas; (g) what analysis has the government undertaken of the potential impacts of the Kinder Morgan pipeline project on species at risk, and what were the results of this analysis; (h) what plans does the federal government have in place to address and mitigate the impacts of the Kinder Morgan pipeline project on species at risk; (i) what analysis has the government undertaken of the potential impacts of the increased tanker traffic resulting from the Kinder Morgan pipeline project on Canada’s Marine Conservation Areas, and what were the results of this analysis; (j) what plans does the government have in place to address and mitigate the impacts of the increased tanker traffic resulting from the Kinder Morgan pipeline project on Canada’s Marine Conservation Areas; (k) what analysis has the government undertaken of the potential impacts of the Kinder Morgan pipeline project regarding the threat of introducing invasive species, and what were the results of this analysis; and (l) what plans does the government have in place to address and mitigate the threat of invasive species resulting from the Kinder Morgan pipeline project? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1769.
2018-06-13 [p.3656]
— by Mr. Fraser (West Nova), one concerning air transportation (No. 421-02458).
2018-05-29 [p.3291]
Mrs. Schulte (King—Vaughan), from the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented the 15th Report of the Committee (Bill C-69, An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, with amendments). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-402.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 99, 101 to 108 and 110 to 114) was tabled.
2018-05-07 [p.3210]
Q-1594 — Mr. Fast (Abbotsford) — With regard to the Speaker’s ruling of March 20, 2018, that “There is no question that the work of Members of Parliament is made more difficult without expeditious access to legislative information. Given this reality, there is a rightful expectation that those responsible for the information should do their utmost to ensure Members access to it. Not respecting this expectation does a disservice to all. It is particularly disconcerting when the Government gives priority to the media over the Members of Parliament.”: What measures have been taken by the Prime Minister`s Office and the Privy Council Office to comply with the Speaker`s admonition in his ruling? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1594.
2018-03-20 [p.2775]
— by Mr. Erskine-Smith (Beaches—East York), one concerning genetic engineering (No. 421-02173) and one concerning hazardous products (No. 421-02174).
2018-03-19 [p.2752]
Q-1433 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — With regard to government expenditures related to the National Energy Board Modernization Expert Panel, what were: (a) the costs associated with the Panel; and (b) the costs associated with the Panel to review the federal environmental assessment processes? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1433.
2018-02-28 [p.2732]
— by Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South), one concerning waste management (No. 421-02106);
2018-02-08 [p.2669]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Ms. McKenna (Minister of Environment and Climate Change), seconded by Mr. Sajjan (Minister of National Defence), Bill C-69, An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts”.
2017-11-08 [p.2356]
— No. 421-01664 concerning natural gas. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-28-05;
2017-09-25 [p.2148]
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning natural gas (No. 421-01664) and one concerning housing policy (No. 421-01665);
2017-09-18 [p.2087]
— No. 421-01421 concerning natural gas. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-28-04;
2017-06-16 [p.1970]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. DeCourcey (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Foreign Affairs) laid upon the Table, — Copy of the Amendments to the Espoo Convention, and Explanatory Memorandum, adopted at Sofia on February 26 and 27, 2001, and at Cavtat from June 1 to 4, 2004. — Sessional Paper No. 8532-421-43.
2017-06-01 [p.1808]
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning the fishing industry (No. 421-01420) and one concerning natural gas (No. 421-01421);
2017-04-03 [p.1541]
— No. 421-01156 concerning environmental assessment and review. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-118-02;
2017-02-17 [p.1372]
— by Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby), one concerning environmental assessment and review (No. 421-01156).
2017-01-30 [p.1224]
— No. 421-01079 concerning port authorities. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-59-02.
2016-12-14 [p.1207]
— by Ms. Kwan (Vancouver East), one concerning port authorities (No. 421-01079);
2016-11-15 [p.1023]
— by Mr. Donnelly (Port Moody—Coquitlam), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-00885) and one concerning hunting (No. 421-00886);
2016-09-26 [p.785]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Fillmore (Halifax), seconded by Mr. Amos (Pontiac), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should ensure that: (a) before making decisions on infrastructure funding proposals, where federal funding exceeds $500 000, an analysis of their impact on greenhouse gas emissions is considered; and (b) where appropriate, funding priority be given to proposals which help to mitigate the impacts of climate change; (Private Members' Business M-45)
And of the amendment of Ms. Rudd (Northumberland—Peterborough South), seconded by Mrs. Caesar-Chavannes (Whitby), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the words “funding proposals,” and substituting the following:
“an analysis of their impact on greenhouse gas emissions is undertaken for those projects exceeding an appropriate threshold to be established in an implementation plan; (b) where appropriate, funding priority be given to proposals which help to mitigate the impacts of climate change; and (c) that an implementation plan be developed.”.
The debate continued.
2016-09-26 [p.785]
The question was put on the amendment and, pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, September 28, 2016, immediately before the time provided for Private Members' Business.
2016-09-19 [p.736]
Q-253 — Mr. Stewart (Burnaby South) — With regard to the Ministerial Panel examining the proposed Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) Project: (a) what process was used to select panel members; (b) what salary is each panel member receiving; (c) what per diem is each panel member receiving; (d) what is the total amount budgeted to support the work of the panel from now until November 2016; (e) of the total budget in (d), what amount is allocated to support the panel to (i) review and consider input from the public via an on-line portal, (ii) meet with local stakeholder representatives in communities along the pipeline and shipping route, (iii) meet with Indigenous groups who wish to share their views with the panel, (iv) submit a report to the Minister of Natural Resources no later than November 1, 2016; (f) how much funding will be made available to local stakeholder representatives who wish to share their views with the panel; (g) how much funding will be made available to Indigenous groups who wish to share their views with the panel; (h) what measures will the panel take to seek and include the views of those who were previously rejected from participating as commentators or intervenors in the National Energy Board’s review of the project; (i) what measures will the government take to promote and advertise the online questionnaire for Canadians to submit their feedback on the TMX Project; (j) will the raw data and results from the online questionnaire be released to the public; (k) what statistical methods will the panel use to analyze the input received from the online questionnaire and decide how to weigh the results in their final report; (l) does the panel’s mandate include providing a recommendation, as part of their final report to the Minister, regarding whether the government should approve or reject Kinder Morgan's application; and (m) what is the government’s definition of “social license”? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-253.
2016-08-17 [p.707]
— No. 421-00482 concerning port authorities. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-59-01;
Results: 1 - 60 of 311 | Page: 1 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
>
>|