Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 15 of 99
2021-06-21 [p.1182]
— by Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), one concerning national defence and military operations (No. 432-01181) and one concerning the environment (No. 432-01182);
2021-06-21 [p.1183]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the return to the following question made into an order for return:
Q-740 — Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — With regard to the Department of National Defence (DND) firing ranges in Nanaimo and Chilliwack, British Columbia (BC): (a) did the use of the Nanaimo range change since the 2019 closure of the Vokes range in Chilliwack, including (i) how many days per year the range is being used now versus before the closure of the Vokes range, (ii) any change in the caliber of weapons being used in the Nanaimo range; (b) did the DND assess the (i) sound intensity, including rapidity and decibel levels of the firing range at various distances over time, including before and after the closure of Vokes range, (ii) social and health impacts of the range on local residents within a 10-kilometre radius from the range, including residents with post-traumatic stress disorder and refugees from war zones, (iii) impact of the range on the surrounding environment and wildlife, (iv) feasibility of relocating the range to a less populated area, well outside of present and future residential neighbourhoods and potential developments; (c) did the DND complete its planned review of all of its assets in BC and, if not, when does it estimate it will be completed; and (d) did the DND conduct any of said assessments or reviews, and, if so, (i) what were the results, (ii) what actions have been taken as a result, (iii) will future actions be taken as a result, and, if so, when? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-432-740.
2021-06-21 [p.1192]
Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), seconded by Ms. McPherson (Edmonton Strathcona), moved Motion No. 5, — That Bill C-10, in Clause 8, be amended by adding after line 39 on page 14 the following:“(7.1) Subsection 10(1) of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (g):(g.1) prescribing the requirements for Canadian producers who are creating content for foreign undertakings and online undertakings that provide a social media service to be eligible to apply for the Canada Media Fund;”
2021-06-21 [p.1192]
Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), seconded by Ms. McPherson (Edmonton Strathcona), moved Motion No. 7, — That Bill C-10, in Clause 8, be amended by adding after line 43 on page 14 the following:“(i.1) respecting the establishment of a framework for contractual practices between independent producers and programming undertakings and online undertakings;”
2021-06-21 [p.1193]
Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), seconded by Ms. McPherson (Edmonton Strathcona), moved Motion No. 15, — That Bill C-10, in Clause 12, be amended by adding after line 7 on page 19 the following:“(2) Paragraph 18(1)(d) of the Act is replaced by the following:(d) the making of an order under subsection 9.1(1) or 12(2).”
2021-06-21 [p.1194]
Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), seconded by Ms. McPherson (Edmonton Strathcona), moved Motion No. 19, — That Bill C-10, in Clause 25, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 35 with the following:“ternational service that includes the creation, production and distribution of programming targeted at audiences outside of Canada, in English, French and any other language deemed appropriate, in accordance with any directions that”
2021-06-21 [p.1195]
Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), seconded by Ms. McPherson (Edmonton Strathcona), moved Motion No. 23, — That Bill C-10 be amended by adding after line 17 on page 43 the following new clause:“Review of Regulations46.1 Within one year after the day on which this Act comes into force and every five years after that, the Commission must review what constitutes a Canadian program under the regulations.”
2021-06-18 [p.1165]
— by Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), one concerning the environment (No. 432-01158);
2021-06-17 [p.1138]
— by Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), one concerning the environment (No. 432-01137);
2021-06-16 [p.1121]
— by Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), one concerning the environment (No. 432-01128);
2021-06-14 [p.1101]
— by Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), one concerning natural resources and energy (No. 432-01099) and one concerning the environment (No. 432-01100);
2021-06-11 [p.1084]
— by Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), two concerning the environment (Nos. 432-01094 and 432-01095);
2021-06-07 [p.1049]
— by Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), two concerning the environment (Nos. 432-01041 and 432-01042);
2021-05-31 [p.1009]
Q-617 — Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — With regard to the government funding in the constituency of Nanaimo—Ladysmith, between October 21, 2019, and March 31, 2021: (a) what are the details of all the applications for funding, grants, loans, and loan guarantees received, broken down by the (i) name of the organization(s), (ii) government department, agency, or Crown corporation, (iii) program and any relevant sub-program, (iv) date of the application, (v) amount applied for, (vi) total amount of funding or loan approved; (b) what funds, grants, loans, and loan guarantees has the government issued and that did not require a direct application, broken down by the (i) name of the organization(s), (ii) government department, agency, or Crown corporation, (iii) program and any relevant sub-program, (iv) total amount of funding or loan approved; and (c) what projects have been funded by organizations responsible for sub-granting government funds, broken down by the (i) name of the recipient organization(s), (ii) name of the sub-granting organization, (iii) government department, agency, or Crown corporation, (iv) program and any relevant sub-program, (v) total amount of funding? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-432-617.
2021-05-28 [p.995]
— by Mr. Manly (Nanaimo—Ladysmith), one concerning the environment (No. 432-00992);
Results: 1 - 15 of 99 | Page: 1 of 7

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data