Journals
 
 
 
RSS feed based on search criteria Export search results - CSV (plain text) Export search results - XML
Add search criteria
2017-02-02 [p.1293]
— by Mr. Hussen (Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship) — Response of the government, pursuant to Standing Order 109, to the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, "Distress Call: How Canada’s Immigration Program Can Respond to Reach the Displaced and Most Vulnerable" (Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-95), presented to the House on Wednesday, October 5, 2016. — Sessional Paper No. 8512-421-95.
2016-10-28 [p.934]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That the Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented to the House on Wednesday, October 5, 2016, be amended by replacing the last line of the second paragraph on page 9 with the following: “They might be facing refoulement, forced return to their country of origin, or they may be detained because refugees are not supposed to be detained because they are refugees.”.
2016-10-05 [p.828]
Mr. Wrzesnewskyj (Etobicoke Centre), from the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, presented the Sixth Report of the Committee, "Distress Call: How Canada’s Immigration Program Can Respond to Reach the Displaced and Most Vulnerable". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-421-95.
Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 22 to 27) was tabled.
2016-05-30 [p.519]
— by Mr. May (Cambridge), one concerning assisted suicide (No. 421-00330) and one concerning the electoral system (No. 421-00331).
2015-12-10 [p.39]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Eglinski (Yellowhead), seconded by Mr. Yurdiga (Fort McMurray—Cold Lake), Bill C-206, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (abuse of vulnerable persons), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2015-05-05 [p.2472]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Rickford (Minister of Natural Resources and Minister for the Federal Economic Development Initiative for Northern Ontario) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return:
Q-1116 — Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — With regard to the Canadian Police Information Centre (CPIC) and the Canadian Criminal Real-Time Identification Services (CCRTIS): broken down annually since 2006, (a) what is the detailed budget for CPIC and CCRTIS; (b) how many Criminal Record checks have been submitted to CPIC and CCRTIS; (c) how many Criminal Record checks have been processed; (d) how many Criminal Record checks have been backlogged; (e) how many Vulnerable Sector checks have been submitted to CPIC and CCRTIS; (f) how many Vulnerable Sector checks have been backlogged; (g) what is the average processing time for Criminal Record checks; (h) what is the average processing time for Vulnerable Sector checks; and (i) how many staff have been employed to work on CPIC and CCRTIS? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1116.
2013-08-21 [p.3466]
— No. 411-3892 concerning mandatory background checks. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-411-143-01;
2013-05-24 [p.3177]
— by Mr. Seeback (Brampton West), one concerning mandatory background checks (No. 411-3892) and one concerning sex selection (No. 411-3893);
2012-09-17 [p.1943]
Q-749 — Mr. Goodale (Wascana) — With regard to criminal record checks and vulnerable sector checks performed by the Canadian Criminal Real Time Identification Services for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP): (a) which RCMP detachments have digital fingerprint scanners and which do not; and (b) how many scanners does the RCMP plan to add in each province and/or territory in the future, at what locations, and when? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-749.
2012-01-30 [p.703]
Q-277 — Mr. Hsu (Kingston and the Islands) — With regard to Vulnerable Sector Police Checks: (a) how many Vulnerable Sector Police Checks were processed, for each year since 2006 to the present date, broken down by month; (b) what was the cost to the government each year since 2006 for processing these Vulnerable Sector Police Checks, broken down by month; (c) what is the expected quantity of Vulnerable Sector Police Checks to be processed by the government for the year of 2012; (d) what is the expected cost to the government to process the expected quantity of Vulnerable Sector Police Checks for 2012; and (e) what was the average processing time for a security check in each year from 2006 until the present day? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-277.
Results: 1 - 13 of 13