Committee
Consult the new user guides
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the new user guides
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 9 of 9
View Andrew Scheer Profile
CPC (SK)
Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Thanks to our witnesses for their opening comments and for being available to the committee.
I want to ask Ms. Gillis a question about the recommendation in the Auditor General's report that better monitoring and tracking would be implemented for project delays. At the time the report from the Auditor General was presented, it was highlighted that there were significant delays across the program delivery and that there was no tracking of the effects of those delays.
I want to know if the department counts how long it takes for a project to be approved from the time it hits the minister's desk. Does the department capture that data? When the clock starts ticking, once the municipal and provincial levels have approved a project and submitted it to the government, does the department track how long it takes for a decision to be made on those applications?
View Andrew Scheer Profile
CPC (SK)
How long has the department been providing that kind of tracking service? Is that since the Auditor General's report or does that predate the Auditor General's report?
View Andrew Scheer Profile
CPC (SK)
In terms of tracking the effects of delays, what's the progress been for the department to start to include measures to capture that impact?
View Andrew Scheer Profile
CPC (SK)
Thank you very much.
I have a question for the representative from CMHC.
I believe you mentioned in your opening comments that CMHC manages approximately $32 billion in funds. Am I correct in that number?
View Andrew Scheer Profile
CPC (SK)
In terms of allocating funding for housing projects from CMHC, what is the ratio between funding that's delivered from the consolidated revenue fund from the government versus funds that you collect from mortgage holders who are paying CMHC premiums?
View Andrew Scheer Profile
CPC (SK)
Thanks very much.
I have a quick question for Ms. Fox.
You mentioned that some of the legacy program funding was being used to pay for things like utility bills. That left me with the impression that a program that was designed to build infrastructure is being used to perhaps pay ongoing operating costs.
Is that the case with some of the legacy program funding?
View Andrew Scheer Profile
CPC (SK)
Were those original legacy programs designed to allow for funding for...?
When people think of infrastructure projects they think of infrastructure funding. I certainly didn't expect that funding intended to be used to upgrade facilities—to improve access to clean water or waste water—would be used to pay for things like utility bills or operating costs.
View Andrew Scheer Profile
CPC (SK)
In the interest of the committee's time, I'll cede my time.
Results: 1 - 9 of 9

Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data