Hansard
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 15 of 1058
View John Brassard Profile
CPC (ON)
View John Brassard Profile
2020-08-12 13:04 [p.2754]
Mr. Speaker, I believe Warren Kinsella said it best in his latest blog post that “There's a name for what we've now got. There's a name for a government like...[the Prime Minister's]—a government run by those who seek status and personal gain at the expense of the rest of us.” It is called a kleptocracy.
I looked up that word in the dictionary, and it comes originally from the Greek word for “theft”, “I steal” and “power, rule”. It means a government whose corrupt leaders, or kleptocrats, use political power to appropriate the wealth of their nation, typically by embezzling or misappropriating government funds at the expense of a wider population.
In a kleptocracy, corrupt politicians enrich themselves secretly, outside the rule of law, through kickbacks, bribes and special favours, or they simply direct state funds to themselves, directly or indirectly, and their associates.
We have had $343 billion in deficits and $1.2 trillion in debt, which gives a government a lot of room to misappropriate wealth, or in the case of debt of our nation, to direct those state funds to themselves or their associates.
There is a reason these scandals are profoundly scandalous, especially during a pandemic. It is because the allegations are that the Prime Minister, his family, his connected insiders and his friends sought to enrich themselves during a pandemic that is impoverishing millions of Canadians and killing thousands. While those governed are losing their homes, businesses, jobs and futures, the Prime Minister's family and friends are doing just fine. That is how a kleptocracy works.
There is the WE scandal, with the Prime Minister's family enriching themselves, and the CMHC scandal with Rob Silver, the husband of the Prime Minister's chief of staff. We have now found out that Frank Baylis, a former Liberal MP, has received an undisclosed value contract for $100,000 in non-health approved ventilators. The sponsorship scandal will look like a speck of sand in a desert when this is all over. When this is all over, the Prime Minister and the Minister of Finance will be just fine.
I have a question to ask on behalf of every Canadian before more stories surface, because they will. How many more Liberal-connected friends, families and insiders have had their palms greased and have personally financially gained from this pandemic at the expense of Canadians who have suffered so much during this crisis? Will the Liberals be honest for once or do we have to wait for the Auditor General to tell us?
View Michael Barrett Profile
CPC (ON)
Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the hon. member for Regina—Lewvan.
I would like to quickly acknowledge the work of the hon. member for Regina—Qu'Appelle as the leader of Her Majesty's loyal opposition. This place has been better for his service as leader.
I have a question for the Liberals, who have used this pandemic to provide taxpayers dollars to their friends. I guess we should not be surprised: This is exactly what they did during the national unity crisis of the 1990s. They saw an opportunity and Canadians got the sponsorship scandal. The Liberals tried to feed money to their political allies at the WE organization. Thankfully the opposition stopped them, but now we are learning that the former Liberal MP Frank Baylis got his cut of the pandemic pie as well.
Will the Liberals tell us what the exact dollar figure was for the contract they gave to their friend? How much did Frank Baylis make in this deal?
View Bruce Stanton Profile
CPC (ON)
View Bruce Stanton Profile
2020-08-12 13:33 [p.2759]
Resuming debate, we will go to the hon. member for Elmwood—Transcona.
View Bruce Stanton Profile
CPC (ON)
View Bruce Stanton Profile
2020-08-12 13:42 [p.2761]
Back to the hon. member.
View Bruce Stanton Profile
CPC (ON)
View Bruce Stanton Profile
2020-08-12 13:49 [p.2762]
The hon. member.
View Bruce Stanton Profile
CPC (ON)
View Bruce Stanton Profile
2020-08-12 13:51 [p.2762]
The hon. member.
View Bruce Stanton Profile
CPC (ON)
View Bruce Stanton Profile
2020-08-12 13:55 [p.2763]
We will now go to the hon. member for Souris—Moose Mountain.
View Bruce Stanton Profile
CPC (ON)
View Bruce Stanton Profile
2020-08-12 13:56 [p.2763]
We will go back to the hon. member.
View Bruce Stanton Profile
CPC (ON)
View Bruce Stanton Profile
2020-08-12 13:57 [p.2763]
We will go back to the hon. member.
View Bruce Stanton Profile
CPC (ON)
View Bruce Stanton Profile
2020-08-12 13:57 [p.2763]
The hon. minister.
View Bruce Stanton Profile
CPC (ON)
View Bruce Stanton Profile
2020-08-12 13:57 [p.2763]
We will go back to the hon. member.
View Bruce Stanton Profile
CPC (ON)
View Bruce Stanton Profile
2020-08-12 13:58 [p.2763]
That will conclude that round.
We will now go to resuming debate.
The hon. member for Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill.
View Leona Alleslev Profile
CPC (ON)
Mr. Chair, I will be splitting my time with the member for Chicoutimi—Le Fjord.
The new NAFTA agreement is not worth the paper it is printed on. The Prime Minister claimed victory when it was signed. Here we are, mere weeks after the agreement has come into force, and workers in the aluminum industry are suffering as a result of the Liberal government's failed approach.
Why did the Prime Minister mislead these workers into a false sense of security?
View Bruce Stanton Profile
CPC (ON)
View Bruce Stanton Profile
2020-08-12 13:59 [p.2764]
Back to the hon. member.
Results: 1 - 15 of 1058 | Page: 1 of 71

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data