Committee
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 19 of 19
View Philip Lawrence Profile
CPC (ON)
I can agree with the chair. I would certainly like to see more Liberals retire.
Thanks very much.
My question, obviously, is for the minister.
The inability to collect revenue from tax evaders—which is somewhere in the neighbourhood of $10 billion to $25 billion a year—has real consequences. Our debt now, Minister, is over a trillion dollars, the government's debt-to-GDP ratio will exceed 50% and the government has shown little, if any, ability to control spending. Despite raising taxes on many hard-working Canadians and business owners, it has shown also a very poor record of increasing revenue. In fact, it has zero record of it. No doubt that's partially due, as I mentioned, to billionaire evaders and Liberal friends avoiding taxes.
Will the minister finally come clean today and announce when the Liberals will be putting a tax on one of the few tax shelters left to middle-class Canadians—that being their homes? Otherwise, why would they be tracking the sale of principal residency, if not to eventually tax it?
View Diane Lebouthillier Profile
Lib. (QC)
Mr. Chair, as I said, combatting tax fraud in Canada and abroad is a priority for our government. In fact, we see that budget 2021 includes numerous investments and also policy proposals that have been very well received and are based on the hard work done by CRA in this matter.
I do hope, Mr. Chair, that my colleague will vote in favour of our budget so we are able to move forward and serve Canadians well.
View Brad Vis Profile
CPC (BC)
That's very helpful.
Earlier in your remarks, you touched upon the budget line item regarding the 1% non-residents tax. I don't think I got that completely right, but you know what I'm referring to. In CMHC's market analysis division, have they done a study of the impact of the proposed 1% non-resident tax and the impact it would have on the Canadian housing market?
Romy Bowers
View Romy Bowers Profile
Romy Bowers
2021-05-27 16:20
I have to point out, Mr. Chair, that anything related to tax regulation is the responsibility of the Department of Finance, so it may be better to direct this question to the officials there.
View Gabriel Ste-Marie Profile
BQ (QC)
Thank you.
If I'm not mistaken, the measure is for vacant housing.
Ms. Farha, did you want to respond to that? I saw that you raised your hand.
Leilani Farha
View Leilani Farha Profile
Leilani Farha
2021-05-04 17:20
I could see that Mr. Kershaw was nodding the same way I was.
I shouldn't speak for Mr. Kershaw, but I agree with what Mr. Tremblay said, which is that I thought this tax was an interesting little move. It was a little thing, just a tinkering. I think it's maybe a bit of a red herring.
I don't think it's going to generate much. Even the government itself said it wouldn't generate that much money over five years—$700 million or something. That's not a lot, and really, I've seen those moves. The government of New Zealand did that, for example. Singapore has a similar thing in place. It's not that effective for curbing the über-commodification or financialization of housing.
As I said in my comments, there are other threats, and they're domestic threats. It's the pension funds and the real estate investment trusts and the big asset management firms that are really putting pressure on renter households. I thought it was interesting, though, because it shows that the government is willing to look at some fiscal policy. It's a beginning of looking at fiscal policy and its implications for the housing prices.
Paul Kershaw
View Paul Kershaw Profile
Paul Kershaw
2021-05-04 17:21
To learn from B.C., one of the things that the B.C. government does, to contextualize our speculation of vacancy tax here, is to point out that it applies to well under 1% of homes in the province. It is a tool and it should be used, but let's be clear that it's not a particularly large signal to the housing market, as we have a much broader problem of home prices leaving earnings behind.
View Ed Fast Profile
CPC (BC)
View Ed Fast Profile
2021-04-22 16:37
Yes. You were a partner with Generation Squeeze, which is committed to reforming taxation as it relates to personal residences. Did that cause you any concern?
Charlie Ursell
View Charlie Ursell Profile
Charlie Ursell
2021-04-22 16:37
From my lens, Generation Squeeze was a client of ours. We were playing a content neutral role in facilitating. That's the role we played successfully for two sessions.
I can't really speak to Generation Squeeze's specific policies. I'm not an employee of theirs. I think that's a question for them.
View Ed Fast Profile
CPC (BC)
View Ed Fast Profile
2021-04-22 18:09
This is not about “gotcha”. This is about trying to get to the bottom of the study, which is, I think, very important to Canadians. Obviously CMHC saw it as being important.
You have been quoted in the National Observer as suggesting that you want Canada's tax systems shifted to take more account of property value and other wealth. Is that correct?
Paul Kershaw
View Paul Kershaw Profile
Paul Kershaw
2021-04-22 18:10
When you're talking about my own research work, yes, I do.
Paul Kershaw
View Paul Kershaw Profile
Paul Kershaw
2021-04-22 18:10
In this particular moment, you and I are talking about the possibility of reducing taxes on earnings and trying to find revenue elsewhere. The focus of the lab is much broader than that. That's why we're looking at things related to monetary policy, lending policy, a broad category of tax policies, including Brad's observation about whether we could exempt the first $100,000 or so of earnings for people as a way to try to support a younger demographic. It's a broad range of things.
View Ed Fast Profile
CPC (BC)
View Ed Fast Profile
2021-04-22 18:27
Dr. Kershaw, you are in favour of taxing housing wealth. Is that correct?
I think, in an answer to Mr. Julian's question, you said that there needs to be a move more towards taxing housing wealth.
Paul Kershaw
View Paul Kershaw Profile
Paul Kershaw
2021-04-22 18:27
Well, we already do that in this country. For sure we already tax property.
I would suggest that it would make more sense to us to shift to taxing high-value properties more so we cut taxes to earnings for low- and middle-income earners.
View Elizabeth May Profile
GP (BC)
I'm so excited. I have a quick one for Dr. Kershaw.
I'm very interested in the tax announced in the budget, the non-resident, non-Canadian vacant house tax.
I would like your take on that.
Paul Kershaw
View Paul Kershaw Profile
Paul Kershaw
2021-04-22 18:33
It's a valuable tool. It's one minor tool in the tool box. Will it be sufficient? No. Do we need to go considerably further to address some of the broader root causes? Absolutely yes.
C.T. (Manny) Jules
View C.T. (Manny) Jules Profile
C.T. (Manny) Jules
2021-04-15 12:56
There are a myriad of barriers. I think they're some of the most important barriers this country has to deal with.
One of the fundamental changes that I believe would really address our economic well-being is a proper land title system, so that we can trade among ourselves. We have created about $170 billion worth of a credit gap.
The other thing that could be done is getting the federal and provincial governments to share the tax revenues they collect on reserve lands right now. According to our statistics, through real property tax, first nations—about 110 across the country—are collecting $110 million. The federal and provincial governments, for the same lands, are collecting $700 million. That imbalance should be fixed.
Results: 1 - 19 of 19

Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data