Committee
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 91 - 105 of 1860
View Don Davies Profile
NDP (BC)
James Stott, the assistant deputy of public services, delivered vaccine contracts not to you but to the clerk of the health committee. Are you aware that those documents came pre-redacted?
View Don Davies Profile
NDP (BC)
Would you agree with me that the government was not in compliance with the House order of October 26 when it delivered vaccine contracts?
Philippe Dufresne
View Philippe Dufresne Profile
Philippe Dufresne
2021-06-23 17:30
They've applied grounds in the Access to Information Act as opposed to specific reference to the grounds in the House order, and I'm not able to see behind those redactions.
Philippe Dufresne
View Philippe Dufresne Profile
Philippe Dufresne
2021-06-23 17:30
The House order says they are to be vetted and implicitly redacted by my office on those bases. Yes.
View Don Davies Profile
NDP (BC)
This is my final quick question, Mr. Chair.
If that's the case, obviously the government did not comply with the House order, Mr. Dufresne. That is impossible to deny.
Mr. Philippe Dufresne: Well—
View Don Davies Profile
NDP (BC)
Well, I don't know how much clearer I can get.
Let me go back to you, Mr. Dufresne. I'm not trying to put you on the spot or make you uncomfortable. I'm just trying to prove, I guess, that water is wet.
If the House order says that all documents delivered have to be redacted by you, according to three criteria mentioned in the House order, and you did not redact the vaccine contracts, and those documents came pre-redacted by someone else who redacted according to criteria under the Access to Information Act, is there any other logical conclusion than the government being in violation of the House order of October 26?
Philippe Dufresne
View Philippe Dufresne Profile
Philippe Dufresne
2021-06-23 17:32
Well, you have the House order saying that documents are provided to my office and I would vet them under those three grounds. You received documents that are vetted by the government on different grounds. The issue is whether the committee is satisfied with the grounds that are proposed by the government—namely, the grounds in the Access to Information Act.
Results: 91 - 105 of 1860 | Page: 7 of 124

|<
<
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data