Committee
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 121 - 135 of 1234
View Luc Berthold Profile
CPC (QC)
Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
I'd like to begin by thanking the witnesses for being with us today.
I know that having to put programs in place quickly during a pandemic has its own set of concerns and risks. As we read through the documents you sent us, we could see which risks had been raised and which had been proven to be real over the weeks and months.
My question is for Mr. Hamilton.
I was surprised to see that, in several places in the documents, there was reference to reputational risks to the Canada Revenu Agency.
Can you explain to me the extent to which these risks were considered among the major potential impacts? Why was so much attention paid to them?
Bob Hamilton
View Bob Hamilton Profile
Bob Hamilton
2021-06-08 12:40
I thank the hon. member for his question.
The agency's reputation is important to us, both in times of pandemic and in normal times. It's important because for the tax system to work, Canadians need to have confidence in the agency. So, the agency's reputation is a factor in the decision to participate in the tax system, among other things.
View Luc Berthold Profile
CPC (QC)
You'll understand why I'm asking this question. This is a discussion I want to have because I want to understand what Mr. Gallivan was talking about earlier. He talked about the risk associated with the very small number of audits that will be done of individuals and businesses that received the wage subsidy.
Does the agency want to maintain that tough image, and has this program hurt that image, which you have to maintain to make sure that people pay their due to the government?
Bob Hamilton
View Bob Hamilton Profile
Bob Hamilton
2021-06-08 12:41
These are two aspects of the agency's reputation.
First, it is its ability to deliver benefits in a timely and efficient manner. Second, it is its ability to ensure that those who receive benefits are eligible for them. It's important for us to preserve both aspects of the agency's reputation.
That was a consideration in the period after benefits began, and that process is still ongoing.
View Luc Berthold Profile
CPC (QC)
In terms of collecting money owed to the government, are you concerned that the lack of audits that will be done on the emergency wage subsidy will damage the agency's credibility?
Bob Hamilton
View Bob Hamilton Profile
Bob Hamilton
2021-06-08 12:42
It is certainly always possible to criticize the agency, but I'm very pleased with the balance that we've been able to achieve in this context, as we did audits early in the program. Mr. Gallivan described actions that the agency took during that period, including using information obtained by our auditors. However, at the same time, there was a need to pay benefits.
I think we've struck a good balance, and now we're in the process of doing a little bit more post‑payment auditing, just to make sure we correct any errors that may have occurred.
In my opinion, as far as the reputation of the agency is concerned, I think we've struck a good balance in terms of auditing.
View Francesco Sorbara Profile
Lib. (ON)
Thank you, Chair.
Good afternoon, everyone.
First off, welcome to the commissioner and DM Sabia. It's always a pleasure.
I think this is going to be our last meeting that's not going to be in camera. The next three are in camera.
I want to ask something sort of big picture, because a lot of my colleagues have asked questions with regard to granular details.
We put programs in place and we put in guardrails. Obviously, during the middle of a pandemic, a once-in-100-years event, we had to put in place a program that had the objective of maintaining an employer-employee attachment. At one time, 5.5 million Canadian workers maintained an attachment to their employers, so that objective was achieved. On the CERB, we assisted almost nine million Canadians at one point, so that objective was also achieved.
As my first question, how important was it to strike that balance with regard to the guardrails?
The second component of my question is on digitization. I'm a big believer in digitization, let's call it, on the governmental level. What lessons can we learn—and this also applies to CRA—that we can take away as we move forward? The CRA has an implementation arm; the legislation comes from the Department of Finance. What can we take away to digitize government services and provide them more efficiently and more effectively and at a lower cost to Canadians?
If I can turn to Mr. Hamilton and then Mr. Sabia, I'll leave it to you folks to divide that time up.
Bob Hamilton
View Bob Hamilton Profile
Bob Hamilton
2021-06-08 12:46
I'll say a few words, and then I'm sure my colleague Michael will have a few things to say.
Obviously, one of the things the pandemic has made us all realize is the importance of digitization for now and for the future.
I say that knowing that the agency actually had made a lot of progress before the pandemic. Over 90% of individual tax returns are now filed electronically, so in some sense I think the agency has been in the vanguard of trying to make our operations more electronic and more digitized. Nevertheless, we saw pockets of the organization where we relied on paper extensively. Developing new programs in a pandemic can sometimes perpetuate that.
We actually have a strong initiative right now to try to find those areas where paper persists and try to digitize them as fast as possible, because it is certain that in the future we're going to need more rather than less. That's the future of the agency. We've seen the benefits already of actions that the agency has taken to become more digitized. It just makes us more resilient and more flexible, and it provides better service to Canadians as well. It's a real focus for us.
I'll turn it over to Michael if he wants to add something.
Michael Sabia
View Michael Sabia Profile
Michael Sabia
2021-06-08 12:47
First let me pick up on Bob's comment with respect to digitization.
I think there is a consensus across the government about the importance of pressing ahead and indeed accelerating what the government's doing on digitization. There is a substantial amount of investment in the recent budget for precisely that purpose and to assist the Canada Revenue Agency in what they're doing so that Canadians can interact with the Canada Revenue Agency on a more efficient and purely digital basis.
More broadly than that, the goal is to create a set of systems whereby individual Canadians can interact with their government much more efficiently on an online basis. Those investments extend, yes, to Revenue Canada, but also very much to a number of other departments that have day-to-day interaction with individual Canadians. For instance, employment insurance is another area where significant investments are absolutely needed to ensure that the program is up to date and ready for the challenges of the digital economy that we find ourselves in.
That continues to be a priority and something that we're going to continue to fund in subsequent budgets.
I will just move to this issue about guardrails and the design of the program. I can say this from a distance, because I wasn't there at the time.
When you think back to March and April of 2020 and the kind of economic damage that the pandemic was doing to Canadian businesses and individual Canadians, there was urgency to get a program out there that would have a big and immediate impact. The situation was just that urgent.
If you take a couple of steps back, I think that's one of the reasons you're seeing the Canadian economy now able to react with the kind of energy that it has as we progress through the vaccine and as the energy and the spring of the Canadian economy begins to expand. Hopefully, we'll get a lot more of that through the summertime and into the early fall as the economy fully opens.
This program has played a critical role in greatly shortening the amount of time from when an employer picks up and begins to expand business until their employees are there. One of the things that the government wanted—and I think they were right—was to cut that time to the absolute minimum.
View Julie Vignola Profile
BQ (QC)
Thank you very much, Madam Chair.
With respect to the wage subsidy, we know that only on federal party didn't apply for it, and that party is the Bloc Québécois.
In total, all parties combined, what amounts were paid to them?
Bob Hamilton
View Bob Hamilton Profile
Bob Hamilton
2021-06-08 12:51
Madam Chair, I'm sorry, but I don't have those numbers right now. We can provide them to you after the meeting, unless my colleague Mr. Gallivan has them with him. In any case, we'll find that information.
We'll have to make sure it's not confidential first, but I don't think it is. I'll check it out. If it's possible to give that information, we'll provide it to you after the meeting.
Ted Gallivan
View Ted Gallivan Profile
Ted Gallivan
2021-06-08 12:52
Madam Chair, referring to a specific taxpayer is also prohibited under section 241 of the Income Tax Act.
Ted Gallivan
View Ted Gallivan Profile
Ted Gallivan
2021-06-08 12:52
All information received in the application of the act is considered protected information under the act. Information received about an act that is being enforced is afforded the protections of that act.
Results: 121 - 135 of 1234 | Page: 9 of 83

|<
<
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data