Journals
 
 
 
RSS feed based on search criteria Export search results - CSV (plain text) Export search results - XML
Add search criteria
2019-06-13 [p.5565]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Intergovernmental and Northern Affairs and Internal Trade), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Mr. Sopuck (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa), seconded by Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs for the purpose of reconsidering clauses 85 and 86, with a view to removing the ability of the federal Cabinet to prohibit oil and gas activities on frontier lands based on national interest.”.
The debate continued.
2019-06-13 [p.5580]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Intergovernmental and Northern Affairs and Internal Trade), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Mr. Sopuck (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa), seconded by Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs for the purpose of reconsidering clauses 85 and 86, with a view to removing the ability of the federal Cabinet to prohibit oil and gas activities on frontier lands based on national interest.”.
2019-06-11 [p.5536]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Intergovernmental and Northern Affairs and Internal Trade), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Mr. Sopuck (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa), seconded by Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs for the purpose of reconsidering clauses 85 and 86, with a view to removing the ability of the federal Cabinet to prohibit oil and gas activities on frontier lands based on national interest.”.
The debate continued.
2019-06-12 [p.5537]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Intergovernmental and Northern Affairs and Internal Trade), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Mr. Sopuck (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa), seconded by Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs for the purpose of reconsidering clauses 85 and 86, with a view to removing the ability of the federal Cabinet to prohibit oil and gas activities on frontier lands based on national interest.”.
The debate continued.
2019-06-10 [p.5519]
Mr. Sopuck (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa), seconded by Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs for the purpose of reconsidering clauses 85 and 86, with a view to removing the ability of the federal Cabinet to prohibit oil and gas activities on frontier lands based on national interest.”.
Debate arose thereon.
2019-06-10 [p.5520]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Intergovernmental and Northern Affairs and Internal Trade), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Mr. Sopuck (Dauphin—Swan River—Neepawa), seconded by Mrs. McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs for the purpose of reconsidering clauses 85 and 86, with a view to removing the ability of the federal Cabinet to prohibit oil and gas activities on frontier lands based on national interest.”.
The debate continued.
2018-12-03 [p.4393]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, November 27, 2018, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Morneau (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. O'Regan (Minister of Veterans Affairs and Associate Minister of National Defence), — That Bill C-86, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, be now read a third time and do pass.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Kmiec (Calgary Shepard), seconded by Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-86, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, be not now read a third time, but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Finance for the purpose of reconsidering Clause 470 with the view to ensuring that every employee, regardless of gender, be entitled to and shall be granted a leave of absence from employment of up to 12 weeks if the employee is the parent of a child who has died, including in cases of perinatal death.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 965 -- Vote no 965) - View vote details.
YEAS: 115, NAYS: 162
2018-11-27 [p.4351]
Pursuant to Order made Friday, November 23, 2018, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Qualtrough (Minister of Public Services and Procurement and Accessibility), seconded by Mr. Sohi (Minister of Natural Resources), — That Bill C-81, An Act to ensure a barrier-free Canada, be now read a third time and do pass.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), seconded by Mr. Barlow (Foothills), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-81, An Act to ensure a barrier-free Canada, be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities for the purpose of reconsidering:
(a) clauses 5, 11, 18, 23, 111, and 148 with the view to include dates and timelines to ensure that the Bill will advance accessibility in Canada;
(b) clauses 15, 16, 75, 93, 95, and 146.1(1) with the view to remove permissive language to ensure that accessibility requirements are made and enforced;
(c) clauses 46, 55, 59, 64, and 68 with the view to not allow organizations to be exempted from complying with accessibility requirements; and
(d) clause 207 with the view to require the government to act.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 959 -- Vote no 959) - View vote details.
YEAS: 115, NAYS: 163
2018-11-22 [p.4313]
Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), seconded by Mr. Barlow (Foothills), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word '“That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-81, An Act to ensure a barrier-free Canada, be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities for the purpose of reconsidering:
(a) clauses 5, 11, 18, 23, 111, and 148 with the view to include dates and timelines to ensure that the Bill will advance accessibility in Canada;
(b) clauses 15, 16, 75, 93, 95, and 146.1(1) with the view to remove permissive language to ensure that accessibility requirements are made and enforced;
(c) clauses 46, 55, 59, 64, and 68 with the view to not allow organizations to be exempted from complying with accessibility requirements; and
(d) clause 207 with the view to require the government to act.”.
Debate arose thereon.
2018-11-22 [p.4314]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Qualtrough (Minister of Public Services and Procurement and Accessibility), seconded by Mr. Sohi (Minister of Natural Resources), — That Bill C-81, An Act to ensure a barrier-free Canada, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Mr. Nuttall (Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte), seconded by Mr. Barlow (Foothills), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word '“That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-81, An Act to ensure a barrier-free Canada, be not now read a third time but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities for the purpose of reconsidering:
(a) clauses 5, 11, 18, 23, 111, and 148 with the view to include dates and timelines to ensure that the Bill will advance accessibility in Canada;
(b) clauses 15, 16, 75, 93, 95, and 146.1(1) with the view to remove permissive language to ensure that accessibility requirements are made and enforced;
(c) clauses 46, 55, 59, 64, and 68 with the view to not allow organizations to be exempted from complying with accessibility requirements; and
(d) clause 207 with the view to require the government to act.”.
2018-10-30 [p.4190]
Mrs. Kusie (Calgary Midnapore), seconded by Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word '“That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-76, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make certain consequential amendments, be not now read a third time, but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs for the purpose of reconsidering clause 378 with a view to amending it so as to prevent a government from cherry-picking which by-elections to call when there are multiple pending vacancies in the House of Commons.”.
Debate arose thereon.
2018-10-30 [p.4191]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Gould (Minister of Democratic Institutions), seconded by Mr. Morneau (Minister of Finance), — That Bill C-76, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make certain consequential amendments, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Mrs. Kusie (Calgary Midnapore), seconded by Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word '“That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-76, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make certain consequential amendments, be not now read a third time, but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs for the purpose of reconsidering clause 378 with a view to amending it so as to prevent a government from cherry-picking which by-elections to call when there are multiple pending vacancies in the House of Commons.”.
The debate continued.
2018-10-30 [p.4192]
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 921 -- Vote no 921) - View vote details.
YEAS: 130, NAYS: 161
2018-06-06 [p.3504]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Morneau (Minister of Finance), seconded by Ms. Gould (Minister of Democratic Institutions), — That Bill C-74, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Mr. Lake (Edmonton—Wetaskiwin), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word '“That” and substituting the following:
“Bill C-74, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on February 27, 2018 and other measures, be not now read a third time, but be referred back to the Standing Committee on Finance for the purpose of reconsidering clause 186 with the view to requiring the government to reveal how much the carbon tax will cost.”;
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the subamendment of Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), seconded by Mr. Falk (Provencher), — That the amendment be amended by adding the following:
“and that the Committee report back to the House no later than Friday, June 15, 2018.”.
The question was put on the subamendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 732 -- Vote no 732) - View vote details.
YEAS: 80, NAYS: 200
Results: 1 - 15 of 39 | Page: 1 of 3

1
2
3
>
>|