Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 30 of 115
2019-07-17 [p.5745]
— Nos. 421-03696, 421-03817, 421-03889, 421-04148 and 421-04455 concerning oil and gas. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-67-15;
2019-06-18 [p.5679]
— by Mr. Johns (Courtenay—Alberni), one concerning the fishing industry (No. 421-04538) and one concerning oil and gas (No. 421-04539);
2019-06-12 [p.5546]
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning oil and gas (No. 421-04455);
2019-06-06 [p.5458]
— by Mr. Richards (Banff—Airdrie), one concerning oil and gas (No. 421-04148);
2019-05-29 [p.5378]
— by Mr. Johns (Courtenay—Alberni), two concerning road transportation (Nos. 421-03987 and 421-03988) and one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-03989);
2019-05-27 [p.5337]
— No. 421-03415 concerning drinking water. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-46-06;
2019-05-16 [p.5318]
— by Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby), one concerning oil and gas (No. 421-03817);
2019-05-16 [p.5319]
— by Mr. Donnelly (Port Moody—Coquitlam), one concerning oil and gas (No. 421-03889).
2019-05-09 [p.5282]
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning oil and gas (No. 421-03696);
2019-04-29 [p.5189]
Q-2305 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — With regard to the credit agreement between Trans Mountain Pipeline Finance and Her Majesty in Right of Canada: (a) what was the source of funds used to secure the environmental obligation required by the National Energy Board and how will Export Development Canada (EDC) report on this transaction in the future; (b) how was the interest rate of 4.7% determined, who authorized it, and were any officials outside of EDC involved in the decision; (c) does the Trans Mountain Corporation (TMC) have a legal obligation to repay the $6.5 billion borrowed from the Canada Account; (d) what will be the source or sources of revenue the Canada Development Investment Corporation (CDEV) will draw upon to satisfy repayment provisions of the credit agreement; (e) was any portion of the $70 million (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization) in revenue reported for Trans Mountain by the Department of Finance in its November 2018 Budget update transmitted, and if so, to what entities was it transmitted; (f) how will monies allocated by the TMC to give to CDEV for repayment of the debt to the Canada Account be identified in annual financial reports by the TMC and its subsidiaries; (g) does an amortization chart exist detailing how TMC operations will repay borrowed funds, and if so, what are the details of that chart; (h) if generated revenues are insufficient to cover CDEV’s debt to the Canada Account, what organization or organizations within government will be responsible for repayment; (i) how will payment for the purpose of paying down the principal and interest owed to the Canada Account be described in CDEV’s future financial disclosures; and (j) how will EDC identify the receipt of repayment funds from CDEV to the Canada Account? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2305.
2019-04-10 [p.5133]
— by Mr. Dusseault (Sherbrooke), one concerning rail transportation (No. 421-03401) and one concerning oil and gas (No. 421-03402);
2019-04-09 [p.5118]
— by Mrs. Gallant (Renfrew—Nipissing—Pembroke), one concerning oil and gas (No. 421-03343) and five concerning firearms (Nos. 421-03344 to 421-03348);
2019-03-22 [p.5042]
— Nos. 421-03190, 421-03215 and 421-03233 concerning oil and gas. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-67-12;
2019-03-22 [p.5042]
— Nos. 421-03206 and 421-03250 concerning the protection of the environment. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-3-70;
2019-03-18 [p.4698]
Q-2162 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — With regard to the twinning of the Trans Mountain Pipeline and the statement made multiple times by the Prime Minister in the House on February 13, 2018, that “We will get the pipeline built”: (a) when will the government get the pipeline built; and (b) how many kilometers of the pipeline expansion were built or completed in the 2018 calendar year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2162.
2019-02-26 [p.4629]
— No. 421-03145 concerning oil and gas. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-67-11.
2019-02-20 [p.4597]
— No. 421-03120 concerning oil and gas. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-421-67-10.
2019-02-20 [p.4599]
— by Mr. Choquette (Drummond), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-03232) and one concerning oil and gas (No. 421-03233);
2019-02-07 [p.4578]
— by Mr. Johns (Courtenay—Alberni), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-03206);
2019-02-05 [p.4561]
— by Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands), one concerning oil and gas (No. 421-03190);
2019-01-31 [p.4549]
The Deputy Speaker laid upon the Table, — Report of the Parliamentary Budget Officer entitled "Canada’s purchase of the Trans Mountain Pipeline – Financial and Economic Considerations" for the year 2019, pursuant to the Parliament of Canada Act, R.S., 1985, c. P-1, sbs. 79.2(2). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-421-1119-30.
2019-01-28 [p.4501]
— by Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan), one concerning refugees (No. 421-03116), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 421-03117), one concerning China (No. 421-03118), one concerning firearms (No. 421-03119), one concerning oil and gas (No. 421-03120) and one concerning organ transplants (No. 421-03121);
2019-01-28 [p.4501]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return:
Q-2030 — Ms. May (Saanich—Gulf Islands) — With respect to the Trans Mountain pipeline purchased by the government on August 31, 2018: (a) did the Minister of Natural Resources seek a cost-benefit analysis of acquiring the existing pipeline and of building an expansion; (b) if the answer to (a) is affirmative, (i) when was the analysis sought, (ii) when was the finalized analysis received, (iii) in what format was the finalized analysis received, for instance as a briefing note, a memo, a report, etc.; and (c) if the answer to (a) is affirmative, what are the details of the analysis, including (i) name and credentials of the author or authors, (ii) date of publication, (iii) the WTI/WCS differential used in the calculations, (iv) the range in years from which data on Canada’s oil industry was captured and analyzed for the study, (v) the impact of an expanded pipeline on jobs in the Parkland refinery, (vi) the estimated number of construction jobs and of permanent jobs created by the expansion project, (vii) the projected construction costs of the pipeline expansion project, (viii) an assessment of the impacts of a tanker spill or pipeline leak on British Columbia’s tourism and fisheries industries, (ix) the government’s liability in the event of a spill or leak, broken down by recovery costs for marine, alluvial, and land-based ecologies (including but not limited to remediation, rehabilitation and restoration of sites and species, especially endangered species) and financial compensation for loss of livelihood and involuntary resettlement of human populations? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2030.
Results: 1 - 30 of 115 | Page: 1 of 4

1
2
3
4
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data