-Messages from the SenatePassed by the Senate (Commons bill)— ORDERED: That, in relation to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that House of the following:That the Senate agrees to the amendments made by the House of Commons to its amendments;That the Senate does not insist on its amendments to which the House of Commons has disagreed.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsMessages from SenateSenate passage600996060099616009962JuliePayetteJulie-PayetteRoyal AssentRoyal Assent givenA Message was received from Her Excellency the Governor General desiring the immediate attendance of the Commons in the Senate.Accordingly, the Deputy Speaker, with the Commons proceeded to the Senate.The Commons returned to the Chamber.Whereupon, the Deputy Speaker reported that when the Commons had been in the Senate, Her Excellency the Governor General was pleased to give, in Her Majesty's name, the Royal Assent to the following Bills:Bill C-71, An Act to amend certain Acts and Regulations in relation to firearms — Chapter No. 9;Bill C-81, An Act to ensure a barrier-free Canada — Chapter No. 10;Bill S-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins) — Chapter No. 11;Bill C-82, An Act to implement a multilateral convention to implement tax treaty related measures to prevent base erosion and profit shifting — Chapter No. 12;Bill C-59, An Act respecting national security matters — Chapter No. 13;Bill C-68, An Act to amend the Fisheries Act and other Acts in consequence — Chapter No. 14;Bill C-77, An Act to amend the National Defence Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts — Chapter No. 15;Bill C-78, An Act to amend the Divorce Act, the Family Orders and Agreements Enforcement Assistance Act and the Garnishment, Attachment and Pension Diversion Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act — Chapter No. 16;Bill C-84, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (bestiality and animal fighting) — Chapter No. 17;Bill C-58, An Act to amend the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts — Chapter No. 18;Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts — Chapter No. 19;Bill C-93, An Act to provide no-cost, expedited record suspensions for simple possession of cannabis — Chapter No. 20;Bill C-101, An Act to amend the Customs Tariff and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act — Chapter No. 22;Bill C-91, An Act respecting Indigenous languages — Chapter No. 23;Bill C-92, An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families — Chapter No. 24;Bill C-75, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to other Acts — Chapter No. 25;Bill C-48, An Act respecting the regulation of vessels that transport crude oil or persistent oil to or from ports or marine installations located along British Columbia's north coast — Chapter No. 26;Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act — Chapter No. 27;Bill C-69, An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts — Chapter No. 28;Bill C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures — Chapter No. 29.C-101, An Act to amend the Customs Tariff and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal ActC-48, An Act respecting the regulation of vessels that transport crude oil or persistent oil to or from ports or marine installations located along British Columbia's north coastC-58, An Act to amend the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act and to make consequential amendments to other ActsC-59, An Act respecting national security mattersC-68, An Act to amend the Fisheries Act and other Acts in consequenceC-69, An Act to enact the Impact Assessment Act and the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, to amend the Navigation Protection Act and to make consequential amendments to other ActsC-71, An Act to amend certain Acts and Regulations in relation to firearmsC-75, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and other Acts and to make consequential amendments to other ActsC-77, An Act to amend the National Defence Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other ActsC-78, An Act to amend the Divorce Act, the Family Orders and Agreements Enforcement Assistance Act and the Garnishment, Attachment and Pension Diversion Act and to make consequential amendments to another ActC-81, An Act to ensure a barrier-free CanadaC-82, An Act to implement a multilateral convention to implement tax treaty related measures to prevent base erosion and profit shiftingC-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActC-84, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (bestiality and animal fighting)C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other ActsC-91, An Act respecting Indigenous languagesC-92, An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and familiesC-93, An Act to provide no-cost, expedited record suspensions for simple possession of cannabisC-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measuresGovernment billsMessages from the Governor GeneralPrivate Members' BillsRoyal assentS-203, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and other Acts (ending the captivity of whales and dolphins)Senate bills6009976600997760099796009980600998160099826009983600998460099856009986600998760099886009989600999060099916009992600999360099946009995-MotionsDecision MadeBy unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing or Special Order or usual practice of the House:(a) the amendment to the motion respecting the Senate amendments to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, be deemed negatived on division and the main motion be deemed carried on division; and(b) the amendment to the motion for second reading of Bill C-100, An Act to implement the Agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican States, be deemed negatived on division and that the Bill be deemed read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on International Trade.Amendments and subamendmentsC-100, An Act to implement the Agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican StatesC-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConsideration of Senate amendmentsDecisions of the HouseDivisionsGovernment billsMotionsReferred to Committee after second readingSecond readingStanding Committee on International Trade600532360053246005325-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationThe House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Champagne (Minister of Infrastructure and Communities), — That a Message be sent to the Senate to acquaint Their Honours that, in relation to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, the House:agrees with amendments 1, 4(a) and 5(b) made by the Senate;proposes that amendment 2 be amended by replacing the text of the amendment with the following:“(c.1) the Service considers alternatives to custody in a penitentiary, including the alternatives referred to in sections 29 and 81;(c.2) the Service ensures the effective delivery of programs to offenders, including correctional, educational, vocational training and volunteer programs, with a view to improving access to alternatives to custody in a penitentiary and to promoting rehabilitation;”;proposes that amendment 3 be amended by replacing the text of the amendment with the following:“(2.01) In order to ensure that the plan can be developed in a manner that takes any mental health needs of the offender into consideration, the institutional head shall, as soon as practicable after the day on which the offender is received but not later than the 30th day after that day, refer the offender’s case to the portion of the Service that administers health care for the purpose of conducting a mental health assessment of the offender.”;proposes that amendment 4(b)(i) be replaced by the following amendment:“1. Clause 10, page 7: replace lines 25 to 28 with the following:“(2) The Service shall ensure that the measures include(a) a referral of the inmate’s case, within 24 hours after the inmate’s transfer into the structured intervention unit, to the portion of the Service that administers health care for the purpose of conducting a mental health assessment of the inmate; and(b) a visit to the inmate at least once every day by a registered health care professional employed or engaged by the Service.”;”;respectfully disagrees with amendment 4(b)(ii) because it may not support the professional autonomy and clinical independence of healthcare professionals and does not take into account the inmate’s willingness to be transferred to a hospital or the hospital’s capacity to treat the inmate;respectfully disagrees with amendment 5(a) because it would result in a significant addition to the workload of provincial superior courts, and because further assessments and consultations with the provinces would be required to determine the probable legislative, operational and financial implications at federal and provincial levels, including amendments to the Judges Act and provincial legislation and the appointment of additional judges;proposes that amendment 6 be amended to read as follows:“6. Clause 14, page 16:(a) replace line 7 with the following:“48 (1) Subject to subsection (2), a staff member of the same sex as the inmate may”;(b) add the following after line 15:“(2) A body scan search of the inmate shall be conducted instead of the strip search if(a) the body scan search is authorized under section 48.1; and(b) a prescribed body scanner in proper working order is in the area where the strip search would be conducted.”;”;proposes that amendment 7(a) be amended by replacing the text of the French version of the amendment with the following:“c) l’identité et la culture autochtones du délinquant, notamment son passé familial et son historique d’adoption.”;proposes that amendment 7(b) be amended to read as follows:“(b) replace lines 32 and 33 with the following:“ing the assessment of the risk posed by an Indigenous offender unless those factors could decrease the level of risk.”;”;respectfully disagrees with amendment 8 because extending the concept of healing lodges designed specifically for Indigenous corrections to other unspecified groups is a major policy change that should only be contemplated following considerable study and consultation, and because it would impede the ability of the Correctional Service of Canada, which is responsible for the care and custody of inmates pursuant to section 5 of the Act, to be part of decisions to transfer inmates to healing lodges;respectfully disagrees with amendment 9 because extending of the concept of community release designed specifically for Indigenous corrections to other unspecified groups is a major policy change that should only be contemplated following considerable study and consultation;respectfully disagrees with amendment 10 because allowing offenders’ sentences to be shortened due to the conduct of correctional staff, particularly given the existence of other remedies, is a major policy change that should only be contemplated following considerable study and consultation, including with provincial partners, victims’ representatives, stakeholder groups and other actors in the criminal justice system;respectfully disagrees with amendment 11 because five years is an appropriate amount of time to allow for robust and meaningful assessment of the new provisions following full implementation.The debate continued.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConsideration of Senate amendmentsGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness600453860045396004540600454160045426004543600454460045456004546600454760045486004549600455060045516004552600455360045546004555600455660045576004560600456160045626004563600456460045656004566600456760045686004569-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationThe House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Champagne (Minister of Infrastructure and Communities), — That a Message be sent to the Senate to acquaint Their Honours that, in relation to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, the House:agrees with amendments 1, 4(a) and 5(b) made by the Senate;proposes that amendment 2 be amended by replacing the text of the amendment with the following:“(c.1) the Service considers alternatives to custody in a penitentiary, including the alternatives referred to in sections 29 and 81;(c.2) the Service ensures the effective delivery of programs to offenders, including correctional, educational, vocational training and volunteer programs, with a view to improving access to alternatives to custody in a penitentiary and to promoting rehabilitation;”;proposes that amendment 3 be amended by replacing the text of the amendment with the following:“(2.01) In order to ensure that the plan can be developed in a manner that takes any mental health needs of the offender into consideration, the institutional head shall, as soon as practicable after the day on which the offender is received but not later than the 30th day after that day, refer the offender’s case to the portion of the Service that administers health care for the purpose of conducting a mental health assessment of the offender.”;proposes that amendment 4(b)(i) be replaced by the following amendment:“1. Clause 10, page 7: replace lines 25 to 28 with the following:“(2) The Service shall ensure that the measures include(a) a referral of the inmate’s case, within 24 hours after the inmate’s transfer into the structured intervention unit, to the portion of the Service that administers health care for the purpose of conducting a mental health assessment of the inmate; and(b) a visit to the inmate at least once every day by a registered health care professional employed or engaged by the Service.”;”;respectfully disagrees with amendment 4(b)(ii) because it may not support the professional autonomy and clinical independence of healthcare professionals and does not take into account the inmate’s willingness to be transferred to a hospital or the hospital’s capacity to treat the inmate;respectfully disagrees with amendment 5(a) because it would result in a significant addition to the workload of provincial superior courts, and because further assessments and consultations with the provinces would be required to determine the probable legislative, operational and financial implications at federal and provincial levels, including amendments to the Judges Act and provincial legislation and the appointment of additional judges;proposes that amendment 6 be amended to read as follows:“6. Clause 14, page 16:(a) replace line 7 with the following:“48 (1) Subject to subsection (2), a staff member of the same sex as the inmate may”;(b) add the following after line 15:“(2) A body scan search of the inmate shall be conducted instead of the strip search if(a) the body scan search is authorized under section 48.1; and(b) a prescribed body scanner in proper working order is in the area where the strip search would be conducted.”;”;proposes that amendment 7(a) be amended by replacing the text of the French version of the amendment with the following:“c) l’identité et la culture autochtones du délinquant, notamment son passé familial et son historique d’adoption.”;proposes that amendment 7(b) be amended to read as follows:“(b) replace lines 32 and 33 with the following:“ing the assessment of the risk posed by an Indigenous offender unless those factors could decrease the level of risk.”;”;respectfully disagrees with amendment 8 because extending the concept of healing lodges designed specifically for Indigenous corrections to other unspecified groups is a major policy change that should only be contemplated following considerable study and consultation, and because it would impede the ability of the Correctional Service of Canada, which is responsible for the care and custody of inmates pursuant to section 5 of the Act, to be part of decisions to transfer inmates to healing lodges;respectfully disagrees with amendment 9 because extending of the concept of community release designed specifically for Indigenous corrections to other unspecified groups is a major policy change that should only be contemplated following considerable study and consultation;respectfully disagrees with amendment 10 because allowing offenders’ sentences to be shortened due to the conduct of correctional staff, particularly given the existence of other remedies, is a major policy change that should only be contemplated following considerable study and consultation, including with provincial partners, victims’ representatives, stakeholder groups and other actors in the criminal justice system;respectfully disagrees with amendment 11 because five years is an appropriate amount of time to allow for robust and meaningful assessment of the new provisions following full implementation.The debate continued.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConsideration of Senate amendmentsGovernment bills600457660045776004578600457960045806004581600458260045836004584600458560045866004587600458860045896004590600459160045926004593600459460045956004598600459960046006004601600460260046036004604600460560046066004607//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71368MatthewDubéMatthew-DubéBeloeil—ChamblyNew Democratic Party CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/42/DubéMatthew_NDP.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), seconded by Ms. Trudel (Jonquière), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: “the amendments made by the Senate to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Abolition of Early Parole Act, be now read a second time and concurred in.”.Debate arose thereon.Amendments and subamendmentsC-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConsideration of Senate amendmentsDubé, MatthewGovernment billsNew Democratic Party Caucus60046086004609//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/89000BardishChaggerHon.Bardish-ChaggerWaterlooLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/ChaggerBardish_Lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationNotice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, not more than five further hours shall be allotted to the stage of consideration of Senate amendments to the Bill; andThat, at the expiry of the five hours provided for the consideration of the said stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the Bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActChagger, BardishGovernment billsLeader of the Government in the House of CommonsLiberal CaucusMotionsTime allocation599817959981805998181-Government OrdersDecision MadeThe question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 1360 -- Vote no 1360)YEAS: 152, NAYS: 94YEAS -- POURAldagAlghabraAmosAnandasangareeAryaAyoubBadaweyBagnellBaylisBeechBendayanBennettBibeauBittleBlairBoissonnaultBossioBratinaCaesar-ChavannesCarrCasey (Cumberland—Colchester)Casey (Charlottetown)ChaggerChampagneCuznerDabrusinDamoffDeCourceyDhaliwalDhillonDrouinDubourgDuguidDuncan (Etobicoke North)DzerowiczEasterEhsassiEllisErskine-SmithEykingEyolfsonFergusFillmoreFinniganFisherFonsecaFortierFragiskatosFraser (West Nova)Fraser (Central Nova)FreelandFuhrGerretsenGoldsmith-JonesGoodaleGouldGrahamHardieHarveyHehrHoggHollandHousefatherHussenHutchingsIaconoJolyJonesJordanJowhariKangKhalidKheraLambropoulosLamoureuxLapointeLauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation)LebouthillierLefebvreLeslieLevittLightboundLockhartLongLongfieldLudwigMacAulay (Cardigan)MacKinnon (Gatineau)MaloneyMassé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia)May (Cambridge)McCrimmonMcDonaldMcGuintyMcKayMcKennaMcLeod (Northwest Territories)MendèsMendicinoMihychukMonsefMorneauMorrisseyMurrayNassifNgO'ConnellOliphantOliverO'ReganOuelletteParadisPeschisolidoPetersonPetitpas TaylorPicardPoissantQualtroughRiouxRobillardRogersRomanadoRuddRuimyRusnakSahotaSainiSajjanSamsonSanghaSaraiSchiefkeSchulteSerréSgroShanahanSheehanSidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon)Sidhu (Brampton South)SimmsSohiSorbaraSpengemannTabbaraTassiVandalVandenbeldWhalenWilkinsonWrzesnewskyjYoungZahid -- 152NAYS -- CONTREAboultaifAlbasAlbrechtAlleslevAllisonAndersonArnoldBarrettBensonBenzenBergenBertholdBezanBlaney (North Island—Powell River)Blaney (Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis)BlockBoucherBoutin-SweetBrosseauCanningsCaronCarrieClarkeClementDeltellDiotteDreeshenDusseaultEglinskiFortinGallantGillGladuGourdeHarderJenerouxJohnsJoliboisJulianKellyKentKitchenKmiecKusieKwanLakeLaverdièreLiepertLloydLukiwskiMacGregorMaguireManlyMartelMathyssenMcCauley (Edmonton West)McColemanMcLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)MotzNantelNaterNicholsonPaul-HusPauzéPoilievreQuachRankinRayesReidRempelSansoucySaroyaSchmaleShieldsShipleySorensonStantonStetskiStrahlSweetThériaultTilsonTrostTrudelVan KesterenVecchioViersenWagantallWarkentinWaughWebberWeirWongYurdiga -- 94PAIRED -- PAIRÉSBeaulieuLeBlanc -- 2C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 1360Government billsMotionsRecorded divisionsTime allocation5998182//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/1265RalphGoodaleHon.Ralph-GoodaleRegina—WascanaLiberal CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/42/GoodaleRalph_Lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationThe Order was read for the consideration of the amendments made by the Senate to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act.Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) for Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Champagne (Minister of Infrastructure and Communities), moved, — That a Message be sent to the Senate to acquaint Their Honours that, in relation to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, the House:agrees with amendments 1, 4(a) and 5(b) made by the Senate;proposes that amendment 2 be amended by replacing the text of the amendment with the following:“(c.1) the Service considers alternatives to custody in a penitentiary, including the alternatives referred to in sections 29 and 81;(c.2) the Service ensures the effective delivery of programs to offenders, including correctional, educational, vocational training and volunteer programs, with a view to improving access to alternatives to custody in a penitentiary and to promoting rehabilitation;”;proposes that amendment 3 be amended by replacing the text of the amendment with the following:“(2.01) In order to ensure that the plan can be developed in a manner that takes any mental health needs of the offender into consideration, the institutional head shall, as soon as practicable after the day on which the offender is received but not later than the 30th day after that day, refer the offender’s case to the portion of the Service that administers health care for the purpose of conducting a mental health assessment of the offender.”;proposes that amendment 4(b)(i) be replaced by the following amendment:“1. Clause 10, page 7: replace lines 25 to 28 with the following:“(2) The Service shall ensure that the measures include(a) a referral of the inmate’s case, within 24 hours after the inmate’s transfer into the structured intervention unit, to the portion of the Service that administers health care for the purpose of conducting a mental health assessment of the inmate; and(b) a visit to the inmate at least once every day by a registered health care professional employed or engaged by the Service.”;”;respectfully disagrees with amendment 4(b)(ii) because it may not support the professional autonomy and clinical independence of healthcare professionals and does not take into account the inmate’s willingness to be transferred to a hospital or the hospital’s capacity to treat the inmate;respectfully disagrees with amendment 5(a) because it would result in a significant addition to the workload of provincial superior courts, and because further assessments and consultations with the provinces would be required to determine the probable legislative, operational and financial implications at federal and provincial levels, including amendments to the Judges Act and provincial legislation and the appointment of additional judges;proposes that amendment 6 be amended to read as follows:“6. Clause 14, page 16:(a) replace line 7 with the following:“48 (1) Subject to subsection (2), a staff member of the same sex as the inmate may”;(b) add the following after line 15:“(2) A body scan search of the inmate shall be conducted instead of the strip search if(a) the body scan search is authorized under section 48.1; and(b) a prescribed body scanner in proper working order is in the area where the strip search would be conducted.”;”;proposes that amendment 7(a) be amended by replacing the text of the French version of the amendment with the following:“c) l’identité et la culture autochtones du délinquant, notamment son passé familial et son historique d’adoption.”;proposes that amendment 7(b) be amended to read as follows:“(b) replace lines 32 and 33 with the following:“ing the assessment of the risk posed by an Indigenous offender unless those factors could decrease the level of risk.”;”;respectfully disagrees with amendment 8 because extending the concept of healing lodges designed specifically for Indigenous corrections to other unspecified groups is a major policy change that should only be contemplated following considerable study and consultation, and because it would impede the ability of the Correctional Service of Canada, which is responsible for the care and custody of inmates pursuant to section 5 of the Act, to be part of decisions to transfer inmates to healing lodges;respectfully disagrees with amendment 9 because extending of the concept of community release designed specifically for Indigenous corrections to other unspecified groups is a major policy change that should only be contemplated following considerable study and consultation;respectfully disagrees with amendment 10 because allowing offenders’ sentences to be shortened due to the conduct of correctional staff, particularly given the existence of other remedies, is a major policy change that should only be contemplated following considerable study and consultation, including with provincial partners, victims’ representatives, stakeholder groups and other actors in the criminal justice system;respectfully disagrees with amendment 11 because five years is an appropriate amount of time to allow for robust and meaningful assessment of the new provisions following full implementation.Debate arose thereon.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConsideration of Senate amendmentsGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMessages to SenateMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessSenate amendments6010017601001860100196010020601002160100226010023601002460100256010026601002760100286010029601003060100316010032601003360100346010035601003660100376010040601004160100426010043601004460100456010046601004760100486010049//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/89000BardishChaggerHon.Bardish-ChaggerWaterlooLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/ChaggerBardish_Lib.jpgNotices of MotionsTime allocation - notice givenMs. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the consideration of Senate amendments to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act. C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActChagger, BardishGovernment billsLeader of the Government in the House of CommonsLiberal CaucusNotice of motionTime allocation5995254-Notices of MotionsJournals InsertMs. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 57, that, in relation to the consideration of Senate amendments to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, the debate not be further adjourned.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActChagger, BardishClosureGovernment billsLeader of the Government in the House of CommonsLiberal CaucusNotice of motion5995256-Messages from the SenatePassed by the Senate (Commons bill)A message was received from the Senate as follows:— ORDERED: That a message be sent to the House of Commons to acquaint that House that the Senate has passed Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, with the following amendments:1. Clause 1, page 1: Add the following after line 8:"mental health assessment means an assessment of the mental health of a person conducted by a medical professional with recognized specialty training in mental health diagnosis and treatment, such as a psychiatrist, psychologist or psychiatric nurse or a primary care physician who has had psychiatric training. (évaluation de la santé mentale)".2. Clause 2, page 1: Add the following after line 13:"(c.1) the Service considers and gives preference to alternatives to carceral isolations, notably through a broad interpretation — informed by human rights — of sections 29, 81 and 84, thereby recognizing the fundamental role of transfers of incarcerated persons to community-based institutions funded by the Service in promoting rehabilitation, reintegration and public safety;(c.2) the Service ensures the effective delivery of(i) programs to incarcerated persons for the purpose of rehabilitation, including educational programs, vocational training and volunteer programs, and(ii) including alternatives developed in accordance with sections 29, 81 and 84;”.3. Clause 3, page 2: Add the following after line 2:"(2.01) As part of the development of every offender's correctional plan under subsection (1), the institutional head shall refer, in the prescribed manner, the offender for a mental health assessment as soon as practicable — and no later than 30 days — after the offender is received into the penitentiary.”.4. Clause 7, pages 3 and 4:(a) On page 3,(i) replace line 23 with the following:“(a) to a hospital, including any mental health facility, or to a provincial correctional facility, in accordance with an agreement entered into under paragraph 16(1)(a) and any applicable regulations;(b) within a penitentiary, from an area that has been",(ii) replace lines 28 and 29 with the following:"28; or(c) to another penitentiary, in accordance with the”, and(iii) replace lines 31 to 34 with the following:"section 28."; and(b) on page 4,(i) add the following after line 5:"(1.1) Within 24 hours of a person being transferred into a structured intervention unit in a penitentiary under subsection (1), the person who authorized the transfer shall refer, in the prescribed manner, the inmate for a mental health assessment.", and(ii) add the following after line 11:"29.02 If a mental health assessment or an assessment by a registered health care professional concludes that an incarcerated person suffers from any disabling mental health issue, the Commissioner shall authorize that person's transfer to a psychiatric hospital in accordance with section 29.".5. Clause 10, pages 5 and 15:(a) On page 5, replace lines 19 and 20 with the following:“33 (1) Any confinement in a structured intervention unit is to end as soon as possible. In particular, no such confinement is to have a duration of more than 48 hours unless authorized by a Superior Court under subsection (2).(2) A Superior Court may, on application by the Service, extend the duration of the period referred to in subsection (1) as the Court considers appropriate if, in the opinion of the Court, the extension is necessary for a purpose described in subsection 32(1)."; and(b) on page 15, replace line 15 with the following:"ment and sections 29.01, 33, 35 to 37.4 and 37.81 to 37.83 apply".6. Clause 14, page 16: Replace lines 7 to 15 with the following:“48 A staff member may not conduct a strip search of any person confined in a penitentiary without individualized reasonable grounds.".7. Clause 23, page 18:(a) Replace line 29 with the following:"er, including his or her family and adoption history."; and(b) replace lines 31 to 33 with the following:“to be taken into consideration for decisions respecting the assessment of the risk posed by an Indigenous person, but only to decrease the level of risk posed by such a person.”.8. Clause 24, page 19: Replace lines 1 to 11 with the following:"24 Section 81 of the Act is replaced by the following:81 (1) The Minister or a person authorized by the Minister may, for the purposes of providing correctional services, enter into an agreement with(a) an Indigenous organization;(b) an Indigenous governing body;(c) a community group that focuses on the needs of a disadvantaged or minority population;(d) a community organization that serves a disadvantaged or minority population; or(e) any other entity that will provide community-based support services, including to other specific populations.(2) For the purposes of paragraphs (1)(c) and (d), a disadvantaged or minority population includes any population that is marginalized on the basis of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or disability.(3) An agreement under subsection (1) may provide for payment by the Minister or a person authorized by the Minister in respect of the services provided by an entity described in paragraphs (1)(a) to (e).(4) In accordance with any agreement entered into under subsection (1), the Commissioner may transfer a person confined in a penitentiary to an entity described in paragraphs (a) to (e) with the consent of that entity and the person serving a sentence.(5) The Commissioner is to take all reasonable steps to(a) identify entities described in paragraphs 1(a) to (e) for the purpose of entering into agreements; and(b) seek to transfer persons confined in a penitentiary to an entity with which an agreement exists, particularly in cases in which the person is a member of a disadvantaged or minority population that the entity seeks to serve.(6) No person confined in a penitentiary is to be denied a transfer to an entity with which an agreement exists if the person and the entity consent unless the transfer is, as determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction, not to be in the interests of justice.”.9. Clause 25, page 20: Replace lines 3 to 10 with the following:“84 (1) If a person confined in a penitentiary requests the support, on release, of an entity referred to in subsection (2), the Service shall provide that entity with an opportunity to propose a plan for the person's release and integration into the community in which the person is to be released.(2) The following are the relevant entities for the purposes of subsection (1):(a) the community's Indigenous governing body, if applicable;(b) an Indigenous organization that is active in the community;(c) a community group that focuses on the needs of a disadvantaged or minority population;(d) a community organization that serves a disadvantaged or minority population; and(e) any other entity that provides support services in the community, including to other specific populations.(3) For the purposes of subsection (2), a disadvantaged or minority population includes any population that is marginalized on the basis of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or disability.(4) The Service shall(a) take all reasonable measures to inform confined persons about the entities described in paragraphs (2)(a) to (e); and(b) give every entity that has proposed a plan referred to in subsection (1) adequate notice of the person's parole review or their statutory release date, as the case may be.(5) If the Parole Board of Canada makes any decision that is inconsistent with a plan that has been proposed by an entity for the release and integration of a person into a community, it shall provide written reasons for its decision.".10. New clause 35.1, page 23: Add the following after line 34:“35.1 The Act is amended by adding the following after section 198:PART III.1Unfairness in the Administration of a Sentence198.1 (1) An incarcerated person may apply to the court that imposed the sentence being served for an order reducing the period of their incarceration or parole ineligibility as the Court considers appropriate and just in the circumstances if, in the opinion of the Court, there was unfairness in the administration of a sentence.(2) In subsection (1), unfairness in the administration of a sentence includes any decision, recommendation, act or omission of the Commissioner or any person under the control and management of, or performing services for or on behalf of, the Commissioner that affected the person and that was(a) contrary to law or an established policy;(b) unreasonable, unjust, oppressive or improperly discriminatory;(c) based wholly or partly on a mistake of law or fact; or(d) an abuse of discretionary power.(3) An application under subsection (1) must be made(a) no later than 60 days after(i) the events giving rise to the alleged unfairness in the administration of a sentence occurred,(ii) the Service has provided to the incarcerated person any incident report or other document related to the events giving rise to the alleged unfairness in the administration of a sentence, or(iii) the person is informed of the conclusions and recommendations of the Correctional Investigator under section 178 in relation to these events; or(b) within any other period of time that the Court may establish, at its discretion and at any time, if that period is greater than the period referred to in paragraph (a).(4) Nothing in this section abrogates or derogates from any other right or remedy that may be available to an incarcerated person, including a right or remedy under this Act.”.11. Clause 40.1, pages 24 and 25:(a) On page 24, replace lines 25 to 31 with the following:"40.1 (1) At the start of the second year after the day on which this section comes into force, and at the start of the fifth year after the day on which this section comes into force, a comprehensive review of the provisions enacted by this Act must be undertaken by a committee of the Senate and a committee of the House of Commons that may be designated or established for that purpose.(2) The review referred to in subsection (1) must include a review of the progress that has been made in eliminating practices that involve separating an incarcerated person from the general population of a penitentiary.(3) A committee referred to in subsection (1) must, within one year after a review is undertaken under that subsection, submit a report to the House of Parliament of which it is a committee, including a statement setting out any changes to the provisions that the committee recommends for the purpose of ensuring the elimination of practices that involve separating an incarcerated person from the general population of a penitentiary."; and(b) on page 25, delete lines 1 to 7.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsMessages from SenateSenate amendmentsSenate passage59903735990374599037559903765990377599037859903795990380599038159903825990383599038459903855990386599038759903885990389599039159903925990393599039459903955990396599039759903985990399599040059904015990402599040359904045990405599040659904075990408599040959904105990411599041259904135990414599041559904165990417599041859904195990420599042159904225990423599042459904255990426599042759904285990429599043059904315990432599043359904345990435599043659904375990438599043959904405990441599044259904435990444599044559904465990447599044859904495990450599045159904525990453599045459904555990456599045759904585990459599046059904615990462-Deferred Recorded DivisionsGovernment OrdersDecision MadePursuant to Standing Order 45, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Champagne (Minister of Infrastructure and Communities), — That Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, be now read a third time and do pass.The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 1006 -- Vote no 1006)YEAS: 167, NAYS: 123YEAS -- POURAldagAlghabraAmosAnandasangareeArseneaultAryaAyoubBadaweyBagnellBainsBeechBendayanBennettBibeauBittleBlairBoissonnaultBossioBratinaBretonCaesar-ChavannesCarrChaggerChampagneChenCormierCuznerDabrusinDamoffDeCourceyDhaliwalDhillonDrouinDubourgDuclosDuguidDuncan (Etobicoke North)DzerowiczEasterEhsassiEl-KhouryEllisEykingFergusFillmoreFinniganFisherFonsecaFortierFragiskatosFraser (West Nova)Fraser (Central Nova)FreelandFryFuhrGarneauGerretsenGoldsmith-JonesGoodaleGouldGrahamGrewalHajduHardieHarveyHébertHehrHoggHollandHousefatherHussenHutchingsIaconoJolyJordanJowhariKhalidKheraLambropoulosLamettiLamoureuxLapointeLauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation)LebouthillierLefebvreLevittLightboundLockhartLongLongfieldLudwigMacAulay (Cardigan)MacKinnon (Gatineau)MaloneyMassé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia)May (Cambridge)McCrimmonMcDonaldMcGuintyMcKayMcKennaMcKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam)McLeod (Northwest Territories)MendèsMendicinoMihychukMiller (Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs)MonsefMorrisseyMurrayNassifNaultNgO'ConnellOliphantO'ReganOuelletteParadisPeschisolidoPetersonPetitpas TaylorPhilpottPicardPoissantQualtroughRatansiRiouxRobillardRogersRomanadoRotaRuddRuimyRusnakSahotaSainiSajjanSamsonSanghaSaraiScarpaleggiaSchiefkeSerréSgroShanahanSheehanSidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon)Sidhu (Brampton South)SikandSimmsSohiSorbaraSpengemannTabbaraTanTassiVandalVandenbeldVaughanViraniWhalenWilkinsonWilson-RaybouldWrzesnewskyjYipYoungZahid -- 167NAYS -- CONTREAboultaifAlbasAlbrechtAlleslevAndersonArnoldAubinBarlowBarrettBarsalou-DuvalBeaulieuBensonBenzenBergenBernierBertholdBlaikieBlockBoucherBoudriasBoutin-SweetBrassardBrosseauCalkinsCanningsCaronCarrieChongChoquetteClarkeCooperCullenDavidsonDiotteDohertyDreeshenDubéDuncan (Edmonton Strathcona)DusseaultDuvallEglinskiFalk (Battlefords—Lloydminster)Falk (Provencher)FastFortinGallantGarrisonGénéreuxGenuisGladuGourdeHardcastleHarderHobackHughesJenerouxJohnsJoliboisJulianKellyKentKitchenKmiecKusieKwanLakeLaverdièreLeitchLiepertLloydLobbLukiwskiMacGregorMacKenzieMaguireMarcilMartelMasse (Windsor West)MathyssenMay (Saanich—Gulf Islands)McCauley (Edmonton West)McColemanMcLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)MotzNantelNaterNuttallO'ToolePaul-HusPauzéPlamondonPoilievreQuachRamseyRankinReidRempelRichardsSaganashSansoucySaroyaSchmaleShieldsShipleySinghStantonStetskiStrahlStubbsSweetTilsonTrostTrudelVan KesterenVecchioWagantallWarawaWarkentinWebberWeirWongYurdigaZimmer -- 123PAIRED -- PAIRÉSLeslieMooreSgroThériault -- 4Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 1006Government billsRecorded divisionsThird reading and adoption583055258305535830554//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/1265RalphGoodaleHon.Ralph-GoodaleRegina—WascanaLiberal CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/42/GoodaleRalph_Lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationThe Order was read for the third reading of Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act.Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Champagne (Minister of Infrastructure and Communities), moved, — That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.Debate arose thereon.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessThird reading and adoption580959258095935809594-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationThe House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Champagne (Minister of Infrastructure and Communities), — That Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, be now read a third time and do pass.The debate continued.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsThird reading and adoption58096145809615-Government OrdersRecorded division deferredThe question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division was deferred until Monday, March 18, 2019, at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDeferred divisionsGovernment billsThird reading and adoption5809617//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/89000BardishChaggerHon.Bardish-ChaggerWaterlooLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/ChaggerBardish_Lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationNotice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, not more than one further sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at report stage of the Bill and not more than one sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at third reading stage of the said Bill; andThat, 15 minutes before the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on the day allotted to the consideration at report stage and on the day allotted to the consideration at the third reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the stage of the Bill then under consideration shall be put forthwith and successively without further debate or amendment.Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActChagger, BardishGovernment billsLeader of the Government in the House of CommonsLiberal CaucusMotionsReport stageThird reading and adoptionTime allocation579236657923675792368-Government OrdersDecision MadeThe question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 997 -- Vote no 997)YEAS: 166, NAYS: 120YEAS -- POURAldagAlghabraAmosAnandasangareeArseneaultAryaAyoubBadaweyBagnellBainsBaylisBennettBibeauBittleBlairBoissonnaultBossioBratinaBretonCasey (Charlottetown)ChaggerChampagneCormierCuznerDabrusinDamoffDeCourceyDhaliwalDrouinDubourgDuclosDuguidDuncan (Etobicoke North)DzerowiczEhsassiEl-KhouryEllisErskine-SmithEykingEyolfsonFergusFillmoreFinniganFisherFonsecaFortierFragiskatosFraser (West Nova)Fraser (Central Nova)FuhrGarneauGerretsenGoldsmith-JonesGoodaleGouldGrahamHajduHardieHébertHehrHoggHollandHousefatherHussenHutchingsIaconoJolyJordanJowhariKhalidLambropoulosLamettiLamoureuxLapointeLauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation)LeBlancLebouthillierLefebvreLeslieLevittLightboundLockhartLongLongfieldLudwigMacAulay (Cardigan)MacKinnon (Gatineau)MaloneyMassé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia)May (Cambridge)McCrimmonMcDonaldMcGuintyMcKayMcKennaMcKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam)McLeod (Northwest Territories)MendèsMendicinoMihychukMiller (Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs)MonsefMorneauMorrisseyMurrayNassifNaultNgO'ConnellOliphantOliverO'ReganOuelletteParadisPeschisolidoPetersonPetitpas TaylorPhilpottPicardPoissantQualtroughRatansiRiouxRobillardRodriguezRogersRomanadoRotaRuddRuimyRusnakSahotaSainiSajjanSamsonSanghaSaraiScarpaleggiaSchiefkeSchulteSerréSgroShanahanSheehanSidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon)Sidhu (Brampton South)SikandSimmsSohiSorbaraSpengemannTabbaraTanTassiTrudeauVandalVandenbeldVaughanViraniWhalenWilkinsonWilson-RaybouldWrzesnewskyjYipYoungZahid -- 166NAYS -- CONTREAboultaifAlbasAlbrechtAlleslevAllisonAndersonArnoldAubinBarlowBarrettBarsalou-DuvalBensonBenzenBergenBertholdBezanBlockBoudriasBoulericeBoutin-SweetBrassardBrosseauCaronCarrieChongChoquetteChristophersonClarkeClementCooperCullenDeltellDiotteDohertyDonnellyDreeshenDubéDuncan (Edmonton Strathcona)DusseaultDuvallEglinskiFalk (Battlefords—Lloydminster)FastFinleyFortinGallantGarrisonGénéreuxGenuisGourdeHardcastleHarderHobackHughesJenerouxJohnsJoliboisKellyKentKitchenKmiecKusieLakeLauzon (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry)LeitchLiepertLloydLobbLukiwskiMacGregorMacKenzieMartelMasse (Windsor West)MathyssenMay (Saanich—Gulf Islands)McCauley (Edmonton West)McColemanMcLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound)MotzNantelNaterNicholsonObhraiO'ToolePaul-HusPauzéPlamondonPoilievreQuachRaittRamseyRankinRayesReidRempelRichardsSansoucySaroyaSchmaleShieldsShipleySopuckSorensonStantonSte-MarieStrahlStubbsSweetTilsonTrostVan KesterenWagantallWarawaWaughWebberWeirWongYurdigaZimmer -- 120PAIRED -- PAIRÉSChenHarveyMooreThériault -- 4C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 997Government billsMotionsRecorded divisionsReport stageThird reading and adoptionTime allocation5792369-Government OrdersResume consideration on a groupThe House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security with amendments;And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 11 and 13 to 27).C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsReport stageReport stage motions57923705792371-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationGroup No. 1Motion No. 1 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 2.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792372-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 2 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 3.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792373-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 3 of Ms. Damoff (Oakville North—Burlington), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-83, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 2 with the following:paragraph 37.3(1)(b) or section 37.4 or 37.8 that the offenderC-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDamoff, PamGovernment billsLiberal CaucusReport stageReport stage motions5792374-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 4 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 4.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792375-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 5 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 5.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792376-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 6 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 6.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792377-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 7 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 7.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792378-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 8 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 8.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792379-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 9 of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Blair (Minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction), — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by(a) deleting lines 25 to 30 on page 8;(b) replacing lines 1 to 3 on page 9 with the following:(3) Before making a determination under this section, the institutional head shall visit the inmate.(4) The institutional head shall maintain a record indicating the circumstances of every instance in which, because of security requirements, a visit was not face to face or took place through a cell door hatch.(5) No later than one working day after the day on which he or she makes a determination under this section, the institution head shall orally notify the inmate of the determination as well as the reasons for it and no later than two working days after the day on which the determination was made, the institutional head shall provide the inmate with those reasons in writing.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessReport stageReport stage motions5792380-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 10 of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Blair (Minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction), — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by(a) replacing lines 11 to 18 on page 9 with the following:registered health care professional shall provide advice to the committee established under subsection (3).(2) The registered health care professional providing the advice is to be a senior registered health care profes-(b) replacing lines 23 to 30 on page 9 with the following:rank than that of institutional head for the purpose of making determination under section 37.32.37.32 (1) As soon as practicable after the institutional head determines under subsection 37.3(2) that an inmate's conditions of confinement in a structured intervention unit should not be altered in accordance with the recommendations of a registered health care professional, the committee established under subsection(c) replacing lines 34 to 36 on page 9 with the following:(2) As soon as practicable after the institutional head determines under paragraph 37.3(1)(a) that an inmate should remain in aC-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessReport stageReport stage motions5792381-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 11 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 10.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792382-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 13 of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Blair (Minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction), — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 2 to 7 on page 6 with the following:in which an inmate is authorized to be transferred into a structured intervention unit indicating the reasons for granting the authorization and any alternative that was considered.(3) No later than one working day after the day on which the transfer of an inmate is authorized, the Service shall, orally, provide the inmate with notice that the authorization was granted as well as the reasons for it and no later than two working days after the day on which the transfer of an inmate is authorized, the Service shall provide the inmate with those reasons in writing.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessReport stageReport stage motions5792383-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 14 of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Blair (Minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction), — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 36 on page 7 with the following:37.11 If a staff member or a person engaged by the Service believes that the confinement of an inmate in a structured intervention unit is having detrimental impacts on the inmate’s health, the staff member or person shall refer, in the prescribed manner, the inmate’s case to the portion of the Service that administers health care. Grounds for the belief include the inmate(a) refusing to interact with others;(b) engaging in self-injurious behaviour;(c) showing symptoms of a drug overdose; and(d) showing signs of emotional distress or exhibiting behaviour that suggests that they are in urgent need of mental health care.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessReport stageReport stage motions5792384-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 15 of Ms. Damoff (Oakville North—Burlington), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 16 to 23 on page 8 with the following:(c) as soon as practicable in any of the prescribed cir-C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDamoff, PamGovernment billsLiberal CaucusReport stageReport stage motions5792385-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 16 of Ms. Damoff (Oakville North—Burlington), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 10 with the following:and every 60 days after the Commissioner’s last determi-C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDamoff, PamGovernment billsLiberal CaucusReport stageReport stage motions5792386-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 17 of Ms. Damoff (Oakville North—Burlington), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 10 on page 11 with the following:37.6 (1) The Minister shall appoint one or more persons to be independent external decision-makers.(2) To be eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker, a person must have knowledge of administrative decision-making processes in general. A person is not eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker if the person was, at any time, in the previous five years a staff member or appointed under subsection 6(1).(3) An independent external decision-maker is to be appointed for a renewable term of not more than five years and holds office during good behaviour, but may be removed at any time for cause by the Minister.(4) An independent external decision-maker may be appointed to serve either full-time or part-time.37.61 An independent external decision-maker is to be paid(a) the remuneration that is fixed by the Treasury Board; and(b) in accordance with Treasury Board directives, any travel and living expenses that they incur in the performance of their duties and functions while absent from their ordinary place of work, in the case of a full-time decision-maker, and their ordinary place of residence, in the case of a part-time decision-maker.37.7 (1) The Service shall furnish to an independent external decision-maker all information under the Service’s control that is relevant to the making of a determination in respect of an inmate by the independent external decision-maker.(2) For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may require any staff member, or any person whose services are engaged by or on behalf of the Service,(a) to furnish any information that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, the staff member or person may be able to furnish in relation to the inmate’s case; and(b) to produce, for examination by the decision-maker, any document or thing that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, relates to the inmate’s case and that may be in the possession or under the control of the staff member or person.(3) Within 10 days after the day on which an independent external decision-maker makes a determination, the decision-maker shall return to the Service any document or thing furnished under subsection (1) or paragraph (2)(a) or produced under paragraph (2)(b), as well as any copy of one.37.71 (1) Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall provide or cause to be provided to the inmate, in writing, in whichever of the two official languages of Canada is requested by the inmate, the information that is to be considered by the decision-maker or a summary of that information, other than information provided to the independent external decision-maker by the inmate.(2) The independent external decision-maker may withhold from the inmate as much information as is strictly necessary if the independent external decision-maker has reasonable grounds to believe that(a) the information should not be disclosed on the grounds of public interest; or(b) the disclosure of the information would jeopardize the safety of any person, the security of a penitentiary or the conduct of any lawful investigation.37.72 Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall ensure that the inmate is given an opportunity to make written representations to the independent external decision-maker.37.73 For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may communicate with the inmate.37.74 (1) Subject to subsection (2), an independent external decision-maker shall not disclose any information that comes to their knowledge in the course of the exercise of their powers, or the performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.(2) An independent external decision-maker may disclose information referred to in subsection (1) in the exercise of their powers or the performance of their duties and functions.37.75 An independent external decision-maker is not a competent or compellable witness in any civil proceedings in respect of any matter coming to their knowledge in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of their powers, or the performance or purported performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.76 No criminal or civil proceedings lie against an independent external decision-maker for anything done, reported or said in good faith in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of any power, or the performance or purported performance of any duty or function, of the independent external decision-maker under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.77 An independent external decision-maker may, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), publish or otherwise disseminate information, other than personal information, relating to any determination made by the independent external decision-maker.37.8 Thirty days after each of the Commissioner’s determinations under section 37.4 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit, an independent external decision-maker shall, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit.37.81 If a committee established under subsection 37.31(3) determines that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit or determines that an inmate’s conditions of confinement in the structured intervention unit should not be altered in accordance with a recommendation of a registered health care professional under section 37.2, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit or whether the inmate’s conditions of confinement in the unit should be altered.37.82 (1) The independent external decision-maker may determine under sections 37.8 and 37.81 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit only if the independent external decision-maker believes on reasonable grounds that allowing the inmate’s reintegration into the mainstream inmate population(a) would jeopardize the safety of the inmate or any other person or the security of the penitentiary; or(b) would interfere with an investigation that could lead to a criminal charge or a charge under subsection 41(2) of a serious disciplinary offence.(2) In making the determination, the independent external decision-maker shall take into account(a) the inmate’s correctional plan;(b) the appropriateness of the inmate’s confinement in the penitentiary;(c) the appropriateness of the inmate’s security classification; and(d) any other consideration that he or she considers relevant.37.83 (1) If, for five consecutive days or for a total of 15 days during any 30-day period, an inmate confined in a structured intervention unit has not spent a minimum of four hours a day outside the inmate’s cell or has not interacted, for a minimum of two hours a day, with others, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, determine whether the Service has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1) and to encourage the inmate to avail themselves of those opportunities.(2) If the independent external decision-maker determines that the Service has not taken all reasonable steps, he or she may make any recommendation to the Service that he or she considers appropriate to remedy the situation.(3) If the Service, within the period of seven days commencing on the day on which it receives recommendations, fails to satisfy the independent external decision-maker that it has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1), the independent external decision-maker shall direct the Service to remove the inmate from the structured intervention unit and provide a notice of the direction to the Correctional Investigator as defined in Part III.37.9 An independent external decision-maker may, in the prescribed circumstances, make a prescribed determination or review in the prescribed manner.37.91 (1) The transfer of an inmate to a structured intervention unit must be completed not later than five working days after the day on which the authorization for the transfer is given. Until the transfer is completed, the Service may impose restrictions on the inmate’s movement and sections 33, 35 to 37.4 and 37.81 to 37.83 apply with any necessary modifications in respect of the inmate as though the inmate were in a structured intervention unit. However, the opportunity referred to in paragraph 36(1)(b) is to be provided only if the circumstances permit.Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(3)) Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the following amendment to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act: That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 10 on page 11 with the following:37.6 (1) The Minister shall appoint one or more persons to be independent external decision-makers.(2) To be eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker, a person must have knowledge of administrative decision-making processes in general. A person is not eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker if the person was, at any time, in the previous five years a staff member or appointed under subsection 6(1).(3) An independent external decision-maker is to be appointed for a renewable term of not more than five years and holds office during good behaviour, but may be removed at any time for cause by the Minister.(4) An independent external decision-maker may be appointed to serve either full-time or part-time.37.61 An independent external decision-maker is to be paid(a) the remuneration that is fixed by the Treasury Board; and(b) in accordance with Treasury Board directives, any travel and living expenses that they incur in the performance of their duties and functions while absent from their ordinary place of work, in the case of a full-time decision-maker, and their ordinary place of residence, in the case of a part-time decision-maker.37.7 (1) The Service shall furnish to an independent external decision-maker all information under the Service’s control that is relevant to the making of a determination in respect of an inmate by the independent external decision-maker.(2) For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may require any staff member, or any person whose services are engaged by or on behalf of the Service,(a) to furnish any information that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, the staff member or person may be able to furnish in relation to the inmate’s case; and(b) to produce, for examination by the decision-maker, any document or thing that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, relates to the inmate’s case and that may be in the possession or under the control of the staff member or person.(3) Within 10 days after the day on which an independent external decision-maker makes a determination, the decision-maker shall return to the Service any document or thing furnished under subsection (1) or paragraph (2)(a) or produced under paragraph (2)(b), as well as any copy of one.37.71 (1) Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall provide or cause to be provided to the inmate, in writing, in whichever of the two official languages of Canada is requested by the inmate, the information that is to be considered by the decision-maker or a summary of that information, other than information provided to the independent external decision-maker by the inmate.(2) The independent external decision-maker may withhold from the inmate as much information as is strictly necessary if the independent external decision-maker has reasonable grounds to believe that(a) the information should not be disclosed on the grounds of public interest; or(b) the disclosure of the information would jeopardize the safety of any person, the security of a penitentiary or the conduct of any lawful investigation.37.72 Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall ensure that the inmate is given an opportunity to make written representations to the independent external decision-maker.37.73 For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may communicate with the inmate.37.74 (1) Subject to subsection (2), an independent external decision-maker shall not disclose any information that comes to their knowledge in the course of the exercise of their powers, or the performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.(2) An independent external decision-maker may disclose information referred to in subsection (1) in the exercise of their powers or the performance of their duties and functions.37.75 An independent external decision-maker is not a competent or compellable witness in any civil proceedings in respect of any matter coming to their knowledge in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of their powers, or the performance or purported performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.76 No criminal or civil proceedings lie against an independent external decision-maker for anything done, reported or said in good faith in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of any power, or the performance or purported performance of any duty or function, of the independent external decision-maker under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.77 An independent external decision-maker may, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), publish or otherwise disseminate information, other than personal information, relating to any determination made by the independent external decision-maker.37.8 Thirty days after each of the Commissioner’s determinations under section 37.4 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit, an independent external decision-maker shall, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit.37.81 If a committee established under subsection 37.31(3) determines that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit or determines that an inmate’s conditions of confinement in the structured intervention unit should not be altered in accordance with a recommendation of a registered health care professional under section 37.2, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit or whether the inmate’s conditions of confinement in the unit should be altered.37.82 (1) The independent external decision-maker may determine under sections 37.8 and 37.81 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit only if the independent external decision-maker believes on reasonable grounds that allowing the inmate’s reintegration into the mainstream inmate population(a) would jeopardize the safety of the inmate or any other person or the security of the penitentiary; or(b) would interfere with an investigation that could lead to a criminal charge or a charge under subsection 41(2) of a serious disciplinary offence.(2) In making the determination, the independent external decision-maker shall take into account(a) the inmate’s correctional plan;(b) the appropriateness of the inmate’s confinement in the penitentiary;(c) the appropriateness of the inmate’s security classification; and(d) any other consideration that he or she considers relevant.37.83 (1) If, for five consecutive days or for a total of 15 days during any 30-day period, an inmate confined in a structured intervention unit has not spent a minimum of four hours a day outside the inmate’s cell or has not interacted, for a minimum of two hours a day, with others, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, determine whether the Service has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1) and to encourage the inmate to avail themselves of those opportunities.(2) If the independent external decision-maker determines that the Service has not taken all reasonable steps, he or she may make any recommendation to the Service that he or she considers appropriate to remedy the situation.(3) If the Service, within the period of seven days commencing on the day on which it receives recommendations, fails to satisfy the independent external decision-maker that it has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1), the independent external decision-maker shall direct the Service to remove the inmate from the structured intervention unit and provide a notice of the direction to the Correctional Investigator as defined in Part III.37.9 An independent external decision-maker may, in the prescribed circumstances, make a prescribed determination or review in the prescribed manner.37.91 (1) The transfer of an inmate to a structured intervention unit must be completed not later than five working days after the day on which the authorization for the transfer is given. Until the transfer is completed, the Service may impose restrictions on the inmate’s movement and sections 33, 35 to 37.4 and 37.81 to 37.83 apply with any necessary modifications in respect of the inmate as though the inmate were in a structured intervention unit. However, the opportunity referred to in paragraph 36(1)(b) is to be provided only if the circumstances permit.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDamoff, PamGovernment billsLiberal CaucusReport stageReport stage motions57923875792388-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 18 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 11.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792389-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 19 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 14.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792390-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 20 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 29.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792391-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 21 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 31.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792392-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 22 of Ms. Damoff (Oakville North—Burlington), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-83, in Clause 31, be amended by replacing lines 34 to 36 on page 17 with the following:(g.1) respecting the powers, duties and functions of independent external decision-makers, including respecting the making of a determination as to whether the conditions of confinement of an inmate in a structured intervention unit should be altered or as to whether an inmate should remain in such a unit;(2) Section 96 of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (g.1):(g.2) respecting the admission of inmates to and theC-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDamoff, PamGovernment billsLiberal CaucusReport stageReport stage motions5792393-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 23 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 32.1.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792394-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 24 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 33.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792395-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 25 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 36.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792396-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 26 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 39.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5792397-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationMotion No. 27 of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 40.The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions57923985792399-Government OrdersResume consideration on a groupThe House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security with amendments;And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 11 and 13 to 27).The debate continued on the motions in Group No. 1.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsReport stageReport stage motions579240257924035792404-Government OrdersDecision MadeThe question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division: (Division No. 998 -- Vote no 998)YEAS: 122, NAYS: 162YEAS -- POURAboultaifAlbasAlbrechtAlleslevAllisonAndersonArnoldAshtonAubinBarlowBarrettBensonBenzenBergenBernierBertholdBezanBlaikieBlockBoudriasBoulericeBoutin-SweetBrassardBrosseauCanningsCaronCarrieChongChoquetteChristophersonClarkeClementCooperCullenDaviesDeltellDiotteDohertyDonnellyDreeshenDuncan (Edmonton Strathcona)DusseaultDuvallEglinskiFalk (Battlefords—Lloydminster)FastFinleyFortinGallantGarrisonGénéreuxGenuisHardcastleHarderHobackHughesJenerouxJohnsJoliboisKellyKentKitchenKmiecKusieKwanLakeLaverdièreLeitchLiepertLloydLobbLukiwskiMacGregorMacKenzieMaguireMartelMasse (Windsor West)MathyssenMcCauley (Edmonton West)McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound)MotzNantelNaterNicholsonNuttallO'ToolePaul-HusPauzéPlamondonPoilievreQuachRamseyRankinRayesReidRempelSansoucySaroyaScheerSchmaleShieldsShipleySorensonStantonSte-MarieStrahlStubbsSweetTilsonTrostTrudelVan KesterenWagantallWarawaWarkentinWaughWebberWeirWongYurdigaZimmer -- 122NAYS -- CONTREAldagAlghabraAmosAnandasangareeArseneaultAryaAyoubBadaweyBagnellBainsBaylisBennettBibeauBittleBlairBoissonnaultBossioBratinaBretonCasey (Charlottetown)ChaggerChampagneCormierCuznerDabrusinDamoffDeCourceyDhaliwalDrouinDubourgDuclosDuguidDuncan (Etobicoke North)DzerowiczEhsassiEl-KhouryEllisErskine-SmithEykingEyolfsonFergusFillmoreFinniganFisherFonsecaFortierFragiskatosFraser (West Nova)Fraser (Central Nova)FuhrGarneauGerretsenGoldsmith-JonesGoodaleGrahamHajduHardieHébertHehrHoggHollandHousefatherHussenHutchingsIaconoJolyJordanJowhariKhalidLambropoulosLamettiLamoureuxLapointeLauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation)LeBlancLebouthillierLefebvreLeslieLightboundLockhartLongLongfieldLudwigMacAulay (Cardigan)MacKinnon (Gatineau)MaloneyMassé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia)May (Cambridge)May (Saanich—Gulf Islands)McCrimmonMcDonaldMcGuintyMcKayMcKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam)McLeod (Northwest Territories)MendèsMendicinoMihychukMiller (Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs)MonsefMorneauMorrisseyMurrayNassifNaultNgO'ConnellOliphantOliverO'ReganOuelletteParadisPetersonPetitpas TaylorPhilpottPicardPoissantQualtroughRatansiRiouxRobillardRodriguezRogersRomanadoRotaRuddRuimyRusnakSahotaSainiSajjanSamsonSanghaSaraiScarpaleggiaSchiefkeSchulteSerréSgroShanahanSheehanSidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon)Sidhu (Brampton South)SikandSimmsSorbaraSpengemannTabbaraTanTassiTrudeauVandalVandenbeldVaughanViraniWhalenWilkinsonWilson-RaybouldWrzesnewskyjYipYoungZahid -- 162PAIRED -- PAIRÉSChenHarveyMooreThériault -- 4Accordingly, Motions Nos. 2, 4 to 8, 11, 18 to 21 and 23 to 27 were also negatived on the same division.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 998Government billsRecorded divisionsReport stageReport stage motions57924065792407-Government OrdersDecision MadeMotion No. 1 having been negatived, the House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 9 of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Blair (Minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction), — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by(a) deleting lines 25 to 30 on page 8;(b) replacing lines 1 to 3 on page 9 with the following:(3) Before making a determination under this section, the institutional head shall visit the inmate.(4) The institutional head shall maintain a record indicating the circumstances of every instance in which, because of security requirements, a visit was not face to face or took place through a cell door hatch.(5) No later than one working day after the day on which he or she makes a determination under this section, the institution head shall orally notify the inmate of the determination as well as the reasons for it and no later than two working days after the day on which the determination was made, the institutional head shall provide the inmate with those reasons in writing.The question was put on Motion No. 9 and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 999 -- Vote no 999)YEAS: 203, NAYS: 83YEAS -- POURAldagAlghabraAmosAnandasangareeArseneaultAryaAshtonAubinAyoubBadaweyBagnellBainsBaylisBennettBensonBibeauBittleBlaikieBlairBoissonnaultBossioBoudriasBoulericeBoutin-SweetBratinaBretonBrosseauCanningsCaronCasey (Charlottetown)ChaggerChampagneChoquetteChristophersonCormierCullenCuznerDabrusinDamoffDaviesDeCourceyDhaliwalDonnellyDrouinDubourgDuclosDuguidDuncan (Etobicoke North)Duncan (Edmonton Strathcona)DusseaultDuvallDzerowiczEhsassiEl-KhouryEllisErskine-SmithEykingEyolfsonFergusFillmoreFinniganFisherFonsecaFortierFortinFragiskatosFraser (West Nova)Fraser (Central Nova)FuhrGarneauGarrisonGerretsenGoldsmith-JonesGoodaleGouldGrahamHajduHardcastleHardieHébertHehrHoggHollandHousefatherHughesHussenHutchingsIaconoJohnsJoliboisJolyJordanJowhariKhalidKwanLambropoulosLamettiLamoureuxLapointeLauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation)LaverdièreLeBlancLebouthillierLefebvreLeslieLightboundLockhartLongLongfieldLudwigMacAulay (Cardigan)MacGregorMacKinnon (Gatineau)MaloneyMasse (Windsor West)Massé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia)MathyssenMay (Cambridge)May (Saanich—Gulf Islands)McCrimmonMcDonaldMcGuintyMcKayMcKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam)McLeod (Northwest Territories)MendèsMendicinoMihychukMiller (Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs)MonsefMorneauMorrisseyMurrayNantelNassifNaultNgO'ConnellOliphantOliverO'ReganOuelletteParadisPauzéPeschisolidoPetersonPetitpas TaylorPhilpottPicardPlamondonPoissantQuachQualtroughRamseyRankinRatansiRiouxRobillardRodriguezRogersRomanadoRotaRuddRuimyRusnakSahotaSainiSajjanSamsonSanghaSansoucySaraiScarpaleggiaSchiefkeSchulteSerréSgroShanahanSheehanSidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon)Sidhu (Brampton South)SikandSimmsSorbaraSpengemannSte-MarieTabbaraTanTassiTrudeauTrudelVandalVandenbeldVaughanViraniWeirWhalenWilkinsonWilson-RaybouldWrzesnewskyjYipYoungZahid -- 203NAYS -- CONTREAboultaifAlbasAlbrechtAlleslevAllisonAndersonArnoldBarlowBarrettBenzenBergenBernierBertholdBezanBlockBrassardCarrieChongClarkeClementCooperDeltellDiotteDohertyDreeshenEglinskiFalk (Battlefords—Lloydminster)FastFinleyGallantGénéreuxGenuisHarderHobackJenerouxKellyKentKitchenKmiecKusieLakeLeitchLiepertLloydLobbLukiwskiMacKenzieMaguireMartelMcCauley (Edmonton West)McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound)MotzNaterNicholsonNuttallO'ToolePaul-HusPoilievreRayesReidRempelSaroyaScheerSchmaleShieldsShipleySorensonStantonStrahlStubbsSweetTilsonTrostVan KesterenWagantallWarawaWarkentinWaughWebberWongYurdigaZimmer -- 83PAIRED -- PAIRÉSChenHarveyMooreThériault -- 4Accordingly, Motions Nos. 10 and 13 to 16 were also agreed to on the same division.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 999Government billsRecorded divisionsReport stageReport stage motions579240857924095792410-Government OrdersDecision MadeMotion No. 1 having been negatived, the House proceeded to the putting of the question on Motion No. 17 of Ms. Damoff (Oakville North—Burlington), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 10 on page 11 with the following:37.6 (1) The Minister shall appoint one or more persons to be independent external decision-makers.(2) To be eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker, a person must have knowledge of administrative decision-making processes in general. A person is not eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker if the person was, at any time, in the previous five years a staff member or appointed under subsection 6(1).(3) An independent external decision-maker is to be appointed for a renewable term of not more than five years and holds office during good behaviour, but may be removed at any time for cause by the Minister.(4) An independent external decision-maker may be appointed to serve either full-time or part-time.37.61 An independent external decision-maker is to be paid(a) the remuneration that is fixed by the Treasury Board; and(b) in accordance with Treasury Board directives, any travel and living expenses that they incur in the performance of their duties and functions while absent from their ordinary place of work, in the case of a full-time decision-maker, and their ordinary place of residence, in the case of a part-time decision-maker.37.7 (1) The Service shall furnish to an independent external decision-maker all information under the Service’s control that is relevant to the making of a determination in respect of an inmate by the independent external decision-maker.(2) For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may require any staff member, or any person whose services are engaged by or on behalf of the Service,(a) to furnish any information that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, the staff member or person may be able to furnish in relation to the inmate’s case; and(b) to produce, for examination by the decision-maker, any document or thing that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, relates to the inmate’s case and that may be in the possession or under the control of the staff member or person.(3) Within 10 days after the day on which an independent external decision-maker makes a determination, the decision-maker shall return to the Service any document or thing furnished under subsection (1) or paragraph (2)(a) or produced under paragraph (2)(b), as well as any copy of one.37.71 (1) Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall provide or cause to be provided to the inmate, in writing, in whichever of the two official languages of Canada is requested by the inmate, the information that is to be considered by the decision-maker or a summary of that information, other than information provided to the independent external decision-maker by the inmate.(2) The independent external decision-maker may withhold from the inmate as much information as is strictly necessary if the independent external decision-maker has reasonable grounds to believe that(a) the information should not be disclosed on the grounds of public interest; or(b) the disclosure of the information would jeopardize the safety of any person, the security of a penitentiary or the conduct of any lawful investigation.37.72 Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall ensure that the inmate is given an opportunity to make written representations to the independent external decision-maker.37.73 For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may communicate with the inmate.37.74 (1) Subject to subsection (2), an independent external decision-maker shall not disclose any information that comes to their knowledge in the course of the exercise of their powers, or the performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.(2) An independent external decision-maker may disclose information referred to in subsection (1) in the exercise of their powers or the performance of their duties and functions.37.75 An independent external decision-maker is not a competent or compellable witness in any civil proceedings in respect of any matter coming to their knowledge in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of their powers, or the performance or purported performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.76 No criminal or civil proceedings lie against an independent external decision-maker for anything done, reported or said in good faith in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of any power, or the performance or purported performance of any duty or function, of the independent external decision-maker under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.77 An independent external decision-maker may, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), publish or otherwise disseminate information, other than personal information, relating to any determination made by the independent external decision-maker.37.8 Thirty days after each of the Commissioner’s determinations under section 37.4 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit, an independent external decision-maker shall, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit.37.81 If a committee established under subsection 37.31(3) determines that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit or determines that an inmate’s conditions of confinement in the structured intervention unit should not be altered in accordance with a recommendation of a registered health care professional under section 37.2, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit or whether the inmate’s conditions of confinement in the unit should be altered.37.82 (1) The independent external decision-maker may determine under sections 37.8 and 37.81 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit only if the independent external decision-maker believes on reasonable grounds that allowing the inmate’s reintegration into the mainstream inmate population(a) would jeopardize the safety of the inmate or any other person or the security of the penitentiary; or(b) would interfere with an investigation that could lead to a criminal charge or a charge under subsection 41(2) of a serious disciplinary offence.(2) In making the determination, the independent external decision-maker shall take into account(a) the inmate’s correctional plan;(b) the appropriateness of the inmate’s confinement in the penitentiary;(c) the appropriateness of the inmate’s security classification; and(d) any other consideration that he or she considers relevant.37.83 (1) If, for five consecutive days or for a total of 15 days during any 30-day period, an inmate confined in a structured intervention unit has not spent a minimum of four hours a day outside the inmate’s cell or has not interacted, for a minimum of two hours a day, with others, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, determine whether the Service has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1) and to encourage the inmate to avail themselves of those opportunities.(2) If the independent external decision-maker determines that the Service has not taken all reasonable steps, he or she may make any recommendation to the Service that he or she considers appropriate to remedy the situation.(3) If the Service, within the period of seven days commencing on the day on which it receives recommendations, fails to satisfy the independent external decision-maker that it has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1), the independent external decision-maker shall direct the Service to remove the inmate from the structured intervention unit and provide a notice of the direction to the Correctional Investigator as defined in Part III.37.9 An independent external decision-maker may, in the prescribed circumstances, make a prescribed determination or review in the prescribed manner.37.91 (1) The transfer of an inmate to a structured intervention unit must be completed not later than five working days after the day on which the authorization for the transfer is given. Until the transfer is completed, the Service may impose restrictions on the inmate’s movement and sections 33, 35 to 37.4 and 37.81 to 37.83 apply with any necessary modifications in respect of the inmate as though the inmate were in a structured intervention unit. However, the opportunity referred to in paragraph 36(1)(b) is to be provided only if the circumstances permit.Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(3)) Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the following amendment to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act: That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 10 on page 11 with the following:37.6 (1) The Minister shall appoint one or more persons to be independent external decision-makers.(2) To be eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker, a person must have knowledge of administrative decision-making processes in general. A person is not eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker if the person was, at any time, in the previous five years a staff member or appointed under subsection 6(1).(3) An independent external decision-maker is to be appointed for a renewable term of not more than five years and holds office during good behaviour, but may be removed at any time for cause by the Minister.(4) An independent external decision-maker may be appointed to serve either full-time or part-time.37.61 An independent external decision-maker is to be paid(a) the remuneration that is fixed by the Treasury Board; and(b) in accordance with Treasury Board directives, any travel and living expenses that they incur in the performance of their duties and functions while absent from their ordinary place of work, in the case of a full-time decision-maker, and their ordinary place of residence, in the case of a part-time decision-maker.37.7 (1) The Service shall furnish to an independent external decision-maker all information under the Service’s control that is relevant to the making of a determination in respect of an inmate by the independent external decision-maker.(2) For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may require any staff member, or any person whose services are engaged by or on behalf of the Service,(a) to furnish any information that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, the staff member or person may be able to furnish in relation to the inmate’s case; and(b) to produce, for examination by the decision-maker, any document or thing that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, relates to the inmate’s case and that may be in the possession or under the control of the staff member or person.(3) Within 10 days after the day on which an independent external decision-maker makes a determination, the decision-maker shall return to the Service any document or thing furnished under subsection (1) or paragraph (2)(a) or produced under paragraph (2)(b), as well as any copy of one.37.71 (1) Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall provide or cause to be provided to the inmate, in writing, in whichever of the two official languages of Canada is requested by the inmate, the information that is to be considered by the decision-maker or a summary of that information, other than information provided to the independent external decision-maker by the inmate.(2) The independent external decision-maker may withhold from the inmate as much information as is strictly necessary if the independent external decision-maker has reasonable grounds to believe that(a) the information should not be disclosed on the grounds of public interest; or(b) the disclosure of the information would jeopardize the safety of any person, the security of a penitentiary or the conduct of any lawful investigation.37.72 Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall ensure that the inmate is given an opportunity to make written representations to the independent external decision-maker.37.73 For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may communicate with the inmate.37.74 (1) Subject to subsection (2), an independent external decision-maker shall not disclose any information that comes to their knowledge in the course of the exercise of their powers, or the performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.(2) An independent external decision-maker may disclose information referred to in subsection (1) in the exercise of their powers or the performance of their duties and functions.37.75 An independent external decision-maker is not a competent or compellable witness in any civil proceedings in respect of any matter coming to their knowledge in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of their powers, or the performance or purported performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.76 No criminal or civil proceedings lie against an independent external decision-maker for anything done, reported or said in good faith in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of any power, or the performance or purported performance of any duty or function, of the independent external decision-maker under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.77 An independent external decision-maker may, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), publish or otherwise disseminate information, other than personal information, relating to any determination made by the independent external decision-maker.37.8 Thirty days after each of the Commissioner’s determinations under section 37.4 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit, an independent external decision-maker shall, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit.37.81 If a committee established under subsection 37.31(3) determines that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit or determines that an inmate’s conditions of confinement in the structured intervention unit should not be altered in accordance with a recommendation of a registered health care professional under section 37.2, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit or whether the inmate’s conditions of confinement in the unit should be altered.37.82 (1) The independent external decision-maker may determine under sections 37.8 and 37.81 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit only if the independent external decision-maker believes on reasonable grounds that allowing the inmate’s reintegration into the mainstream inmate population(a) would jeopardize the safety of the inmate or any other person or the security of the penitentiary; or(b) would interfere with an investigation that could lead to a criminal charge or a charge under subsection 41(2) of a serious disciplinary offence.(2) In making the determination, the independent external decision-maker shall take into account(a) the inmate’s correctional plan;(b) the appropriateness of the inmate’s confinement in the penitentiary;(c) the appropriateness of the inmate’s security classification; and(d) any other consideration that he or she considers relevant.37.83 (1) If, for five consecutive days or for a total of 15 days during any 30-day period, an inmate confined in a structured intervention unit has not spent a minimum of four hours a day outside the inmate’s cell or has not interacted, for a minimum of two hours a day, with others, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, determine whether the Service has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1) and to encourage the inmate to avail themselves of those opportunities.(2) If the independent external decision-maker determines that the Service has not taken all reasonable steps, he or she may make any recommendation to the Service that he or she considers appropriate to remedy the situation.(3) If the Service, within the period of seven days commencing on the day on which it receives recommendations, fails to satisfy the independent external decision-maker that it has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1), the independent external decision-maker shall direct the Service to remove the inmate from the structured intervention unit and provide a notice of the direction to the Correctional Investigator as defined in Part III.37.9 An independent external decision-maker may, in the prescribed circumstances, make a prescribed determination or review in the prescribed manner.37.91 (1) The transfer of an inmate to a structured intervention unit must be completed not later than five working days after the day on which the authorization for the transfer is given. Until the transfer is completed, the Service may impose restrictions on the inmate’s movement and sections 33, 35 to 37.4 and 37.81 to 37.83 apply with any necessary modifications in respect of the inmate as though the inmate were in a structured intervention unit. However, the opportunity referred to in paragraph 36(1)(b) is to be provided only if the circumstances permit.The question was put on Motion No. 17 and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 1000 -- Vote no 1000)YEAS: 169, NAYS: 117YEAS -- POURAldagAlghabraAmosAnandasangareeArseneaultAryaAyoubBadaweyBagnellBainsBaylisBennettBibeauBittleBlairBoissonnaultBossioBoudriasBratinaBretonCasey (Charlottetown)ChaggerChampagneCormierCuznerDabrusinDamoffDeCourceyDhaliwalDrouinDubourgDuclosDuguidDuncan (Etobicoke North)DzerowiczEhsassiEl-KhouryEllisErskine-SmithEykingEyolfsonFergusFillmoreFinniganFisherFonsecaFortierFortinFragiskatosFraser (West Nova)Fraser (Central Nova)FuhrGarneauGerretsenGoldsmith-JonesGoodaleGouldGrahamHajduHardieHébertHehrHoggHollandHousefatherHussenHutchingsIaconoJolyJordanJowhariKhalidLambropoulosLamettiLamoureuxLapointeLauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation)LeBlancLebouthillierLefebvreLeslieLightboundLockhartLongLongfieldLudwigMacAulay (Cardigan)MacKinnon (Gatineau)MaloneyMassé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia)May (Cambridge)May (Saanich—Gulf Islands)McCrimmonMcDonaldMcGuintyMcKayMcKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam)McLeod (Northwest Territories)MendèsMendicinoMihychukMiller (Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs)MonsefMorneauMorrisseyMurrayNassifNaultNgO'ConnellOliphantOliverO'ReganOuelletteParadisPauzéPeschisolidoPetersonPetitpas TaylorPhilpottPicardPlamondonPoissantQualtroughRatansiRiouxRobillardRodriguezRogersRomanadoRotaRuddRuimyRusnakSahotaSainiSajjanSamsonSanghaSaraiScarpaleggiaSchiefkeSchulteSerréSgroShanahanSheehanSidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon)Sidhu (Brampton South)SikandSimmsSorbaraSpengemannSte-MarieTabbaraTanTassiTrudeauVandalVandenbeldVaughanViraniWhalenWilkinsonWilson-RaybouldWrzesnewskyjYipYoungZahid -- 169NAYS -- CONTREAboultaifAlbasAlbrechtAlleslevAllisonAndersonArnoldAshtonAubinBarlowBarrettBensonBenzenBergenBernierBertholdBezanBlaikieBlockBoulericeBoutin-SweetBrassardBrosseauCanningsCaronCarrieChongChoquetteChristophersonClarkeClementCooperCullenDaviesDeltellDiotteDohertyDonnellyDreeshenDuncan (Edmonton Strathcona)DusseaultDuvallEglinskiFalk (Battlefords—Lloydminster)FastFinleyGallantGarrisonGénéreuxGenuisHardcastleHarderHobackHughesJenerouxJohnsJoliboisKellyKentKitchenKmiecKusieKwanLakeLaverdièreLeitchLiepertLloydLobbLukiwskiMacGregorMacKenzieMaguireMartelMasse (Windsor West)MathyssenMcCauley (Edmonton West)McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound)MotzNantelNaterNicholsonNuttallO'ToolePaul-HusPoilievreQuachRamseyRankinRayesReidRempelSansoucySaroyaScheerSchmaleShieldsShipleySorensonStantonStrahlStubbsSweetTilsonTrostTrudelVan KesterenWagantallWarawaWarkentinWaughWebberWeirWongYurdigaZimmer -- 117PAIRED -- PAIRÉSChenHarveyMooreThériault -- 4Accordingly, Motions Nos. 3 and 22 were also agreed to on the same division.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 1000Government billsRecorded divisionsReport stageReport stage motions5792411579241257924135792414//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/1265RalphGoodaleHon.Ralph-GoodaleRegina—WascanaLiberal CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/42/GoodaleRalph_Lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart Consideration Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That the Bill, as amended, be concurred in at report stage with further amendments.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessReport stage5792415-Government OrdersDecision MadeThe question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 1001 -- Vote no 1001)YEAS: 164, NAYS: 122YEAS -- POURAldagAlghabraAmosAnandasangareeArseneaultAryaAyoubBadaweyBagnellBainsBaylisBennettBibeauBittleBlairBoissonnaultBossioBratinaBretonCasey (Charlottetown)ChaggerChampagneCormierCuznerDabrusinDamoffDeCourceyDhaliwalDrouinDubourgDuclosDuguidDuncan (Etobicoke North)DzerowiczEhsassiEl-KhouryEllisErskine-SmithEykingEyolfsonFergusFillmoreFinniganFisherFonsecaFortierFragiskatosFraser (West Nova)Fraser (Central Nova)FuhrGarneauGerretsenGoldsmith-JonesGoodaleGouldGrahamHajduHardieHébertHehrHoggHollandHousefatherHussenHutchingsIaconoJolyJordanJowhariKhalidLambropoulosLamettiLamoureuxLapointeLauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation)LeBlancLebouthillierLefebvreLeslieLightboundLockhartLongLongfieldLudwigMacAulay (Cardigan)MacKinnon (Gatineau)MaloneyMassé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia)May (Cambridge)May (Saanich—Gulf Islands)McCrimmonMcDonaldMcGuintyMcKayMcKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam)McLeod (Northwest Territories)MendèsMendicinoMihychukMiller (Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs)MonsefMorneauMorrisseyMurrayNassifNaultNgO'ConnellOliphantOliverO'ReganOuelletteParadisPeschisolidoPetersonPetitpas TaylorPhilpottPicardPoissantQualtroughRatansiRiouxRobillardRodriguezRogersRomanadoRotaRuddRuimyRusnakSahotaSainiSajjanSamsonSanghaSaraiScarpaleggiaSchiefkeSchulteSerréSgroShanahanSheehanSidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon)Sidhu (Brampton South)SikandSimmsSorbaraSpengemannTabbaraTanTassiTrudeauVandalVandenbeldVaughanViraniWhalenWilkinsonWilson-RaybouldWrzesnewskyjYipYoungZahid -- 164NAYS -- CONTREAboultaifAlbasAlbrechtAlleslevAllisonAndersonArnoldAshtonAubinBarlowBarrettBensonBenzenBergenBernierBertholdBezanBlaikieBlockBoudriasBoulericeBoutin-SweetBrassardBrosseauCanningsCaronCarrieChongChoquetteChristophersonClarkeClementCooperCullenDaviesDeltellDiotteDohertyDonnellyDreeshenDuncan (Edmonton Strathcona)DusseaultDuvallEglinskiFalk (Battlefords—Lloydminster)FastFinleyFortinGallantGarrisonGénéreuxGenuisHardcastleHarderHobackHughesJenerouxJohnsJoliboisKellyKentKitchenKmiecKusieKwanLakeLaverdièreLeitchLiepertLloydLobbLukiwskiMacGregorMacKenzieMaguireMartelMasse (Windsor West)MathyssenMcCauley (Edmonton West)McLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound)MotzNantelNaterNicholsonNuttallO'ToolePaul-HusPauzéPlamondonPoilievreQuachRamseyRankinRayesReidRempelSansoucySaroyaScheerSchmaleShieldsShipleySorensonStantonSte-MarieStrahlStubbsSweetTilsonTrostTrudelVan KesterenWagantallWarawaWarkentinWaughWebberWeirWongYurdigaZimmer -- 122PAIRED -- PAIRÉSChenHarveyMooreThériault -- 4Accordingly, the Bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage with further amendments and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 1001Government billsRecorded divisionsReport stage57924165792417//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/89000BardishChaggerHon.Bardish-ChaggerWaterlooLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/ChaggerBardish_Lib.jpgNotices of MotionsTime allocation - notice givenMs. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the report stage and third reading stage of Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act. C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActChagger, BardishGovernment billsLeader of the Government in the House of CommonsLiberal CaucusNotice of motionReport stageThird reading and adoptionTime allocation5788737-Government OrdersResume consideration on a groupThe House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security with amendments.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsReport stageReport stage motions5787971//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationGroup No. 1Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 2.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787972//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 3.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787973//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/88884PamDamoffPam-DamoffOakville North—BurlingtonLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/DamoffPam_lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMs. Damoff (Oakville North—Burlington), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-83, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 2 with the following:paragraph 37.3(1)(b) or section 37.4 or 37.8 that the offenderC-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDamoff, PamGovernment billsLiberal CaucusReport stageReport stage motions5787974//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 4, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 4.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787975//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 5, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 5.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787976//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 6, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 6.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787977//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 7, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 7.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787978//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 8, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 8.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787979//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/1265RalphGoodaleHon.Ralph-GoodaleRegina—WascanaLiberal CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/42/GoodaleRalph_Lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Blair (Minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction), moved Motion No. 9, — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by(a) deleting lines 25 to 30 on page 8;(b) replacing lines 1 to 3 on page 9 with the following:(3) Before making a determination under this section, the institutional head shall visit the inmate.(4) The institutional head shall maintain a record indicating the circumstances of every instance in which, because of security requirements, a visit was not face to face or took place through a cell door hatch.(5) No later than one working day after the day on which he or she makes a determination under this section, the institution head shall orally notify the inmate of the determination as well as the reasons for it and no later than two working days after the day on which the determination was made, the institutional head shall provide the inmate with those reasons in writing.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessReport stageReport stage motions5787980//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/1265RalphGoodaleHon.Ralph-GoodaleRegina—WascanaLiberal CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/42/GoodaleRalph_Lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Blair (Minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction), moved Motion No. 10, — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by(a) replacing lines 11 to 18 on page 9 with the following:registered health care professional shall provide advice to the committee established under subsection (3).(2) The registered health care professional providing the advice is to be a senior registered health care profes-(b) replacing lines 23 to 30 on page 9 with the following:rank than that of institutional head for the purpose of making determination under section 37.32.37.32 (1) As soon as practicable after the institutional head determines under subsection 37.3(2) that an inmate's conditions of confinement in a structured intervention unit should not be altered in accordance with the recommendations of a registered health care professional, the committee established under subsection(c) replacing lines 34 to 36 on page 9 with the following:(2) As soon as practicable after the institutional head determines under paragraph 37.3(1)(a) that an inmate should remain in aC-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessReport stageReport stage motions5787981//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 11, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 10.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787982-Government OrdersReport Stage Amendment not proceeded withMotion No. 12 was not proceeded with.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsReport stageReport stage motions5787983//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/1265RalphGoodaleHon.Ralph-GoodaleRegina—WascanaLiberal CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/42/GoodaleRalph_Lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Blair (Minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction), moved Motion No. 13, — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 2 to 7 on page 6 with the following:in which an inmate is authorized to be transferred into a structured intervention unit indicating the reasons for granting the authorization and any alternative that was considered.(3) No later than one working day after the day on which the transfer of an inmate is authorized, the Service shall, orally, provide the inmate with notice that the authorization was granted as well as the reasons for it and no later than two working days after the day on which the transfer of an inmate is authorized, the Service shall provide the inmate with those reasons in writing.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessReport stageReport stage motions5787984//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/1265RalphGoodaleHon.Ralph-GoodaleRegina—WascanaLiberal CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/42/GoodaleRalph_Lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Blair (Minister of Border Security and Organized Crime Reduction), moved Motion No. 14, — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 36 on page 7 with the following:37.11 If a staff member or a person engaged by the Service believes that the confinement of an inmate in a structured intervention unit is having detrimental impacts on the inmate’s health, the staff member or person shall refer, in the prescribed manner, the inmate’s case to the portion of the Service that administers health care. Grounds for the belief include the inmate(a) refusing to interact with others;(b) engaging in self-injurious behaviour;(c) showing symptoms of a drug overdose; and(d) showing signs of emotional distress or exhibiting behaviour that suggests that they are in urgent need of mental health care.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessReport stageReport stage motions5787985//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/88884PamDamoffPam-DamoffOakville North—BurlingtonLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/DamoffPam_lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMs. Damoff (Oakville North—Burlington), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved Motion No. 15, — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 16 to 23 on page 8 with the following:(c) as soon as practicable in any of the prescribed cir-C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDamoff, PamGovernment billsLiberal CaucusReport stageReport stage motions5787986//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/88884PamDamoffPam-DamoffOakville North—BurlingtonLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/DamoffPam_lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMs. Damoff (Oakville North—Burlington), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved Motion No. 16, — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 10 with the following:and every 60 days after the Commissioner’s last determi-C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDamoff, PamGovernment billsLiberal CaucusReport stageReport stage motions5787987//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/88884PamDamoffPam-DamoffOakville North—BurlingtonLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/DamoffPam_lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMs. Damoff (Oakville North—Burlington), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved Motion No. 17, — That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 10 on page 11 with the following:37.6 (1) The Minister shall appoint one or more persons to be independent external decision-makers.(2) To be eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker, a person must have knowledge of administrative decision-making processes in general. A person is not eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker if the person was, at any time, in the previous five years a staff member or appointed under subsection 6(1).(3) An independent external decision-maker is to be appointed for a renewable term of not more than five years and holds office during good behaviour, but may be removed at any time for cause by the Minister.(4) An independent external decision-maker may be appointed to serve either full-time or part-time.37.61 An independent external decision-maker is to be paid(a) the remuneration that is fixed by the Treasury Board; and(b) in accordance with Treasury Board directives, any travel and living expenses that they incur in the performance of their duties and functions while absent from their ordinary place of work, in the case of a full-time decision-maker, and their ordinary place of residence, in the case of a part-time decision-maker.37.7 (1) The Service shall furnish to an independent external decision-maker all information under the Service’s control that is relevant to the making of a determination in respect of an inmate by the independent external decision-maker.(2) For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may require any staff member, or any person whose services are engaged by or on behalf of the Service,(a) to furnish any information that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, the staff member or person may be able to furnish in relation to the inmate’s case; and(b) to produce, for examination by the decision-maker, any document or thing that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, relates to the inmate’s case and that may be in the possession or under the control of the staff member or person.(3) Within 10 days after the day on which an independent external decision-maker makes a determination, the decision-maker shall return to the Service any document or thing furnished under subsection (1) or paragraph (2)(a) or produced under paragraph (2)(b), as well as any copy of one.37.71 (1) Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall provide or cause to be provided to the inmate, in writing, in whichever of the two official languages of Canada is requested by the inmate, the information that is to be considered by the decision-maker or a summary of that information, other than information provided to the independent external decision-maker by the inmate.(2) The independent external decision-maker may withhold from the inmate as much information as is strictly necessary if the independent external decision-maker has reasonable grounds to believe that(a) the information should not be disclosed on the grounds of public interest; or(b) the disclosure of the information would jeopardize the safety of any person, the security of a penitentiary or the conduct of any lawful investigation.37.72 Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall ensure that the inmate is given an opportunity to make written representations to the independent external decision-maker.37.73 For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may communicate with the inmate.37.74 (1) Subject to subsection (2), an independent external decision-maker shall not disclose any information that comes to their knowledge in the course of the exercise of their powers, or the performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.(2) An independent external decision-maker may disclose information referred to in subsection (1) in the exercise of their powers or the performance of their duties and functions.37.75 An independent external decision-maker is not a competent or compellable witness in any civil proceedings in respect of any matter coming to their knowledge in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of their powers, or the performance or purported performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.76 No criminal or civil proceedings lie against an independent external decision-maker for anything done, reported or said in good faith in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of any power, or the performance or purported performance of any duty or function, of the independent external decision-maker under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.77 An independent external decision-maker may, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), publish or otherwise disseminate information, other than personal information, relating to any determination made by the independent external decision-maker.37.8 Thirty days after each of the Commissioner’s determinations under section 37.4 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit, an independent external decision-maker shall, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit.37.81 If a committee established under subsection 37.31(3) determines that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit or determines that an inmate’s conditions of confinement in the structured intervention unit should not be altered in accordance with a recommendation of a registered health care professional under section 37.2, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit or whether the inmate’s conditions of confinement in the unit should be altered.37.82 (1) The independent external decision-maker may determine under sections 37.8 and 37.81 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit only if the independent external decision-maker believes on reasonable grounds that allowing the inmate’s reintegration into the mainstream inmate population(a) would jeopardize the safety of the inmate or any other person or the security of the penitentiary; or(b) would interfere with an investigation that could lead to a criminal charge or a charge under subsection 41(2) of a serious disciplinary offence.(2) In making the determination, the independent external decision-maker shall take into account(a) the inmate’s correctional plan;(b) the appropriateness of the inmate’s confinement in the penitentiary;(c) the appropriateness of the inmate’s security classification; and(d) any other consideration that he or she considers relevant.37.83 (1) If, for five consecutive days or for a total of 15 days during any 30-day period, an inmate confined in a structured intervention unit has not spent a minimum of four hours a day outside the inmate’s cell or has not interacted, for a minimum of two hours a day, with others, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, determine whether the Service has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1) and to encourage the inmate to avail themselves of those opportunities.(2) If the independent external decision-maker determines that the Service has not taken all reasonable steps, he or she may make any recommendation to the Service that he or she considers appropriate to remedy the situation.(3) If the Service, within the period of seven days commencing on the day on which it receives recommendations, fails to satisfy the independent external decision-maker that it has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1), the independent external decision-maker shall direct the Service to remove the inmate from the structured intervention unit and provide a notice of the direction to the Correctional Investigator as defined in Part III.37.9 An independent external decision-maker may, in the prescribed circumstances, make a prescribed determination or review in the prescribed manner.37.91 (1) The transfer of an inmate to a structured intervention unit must be completed not later than five working days after the day on which the authorization for the transfer is given. Until the transfer is completed, the Service may impose restrictions on the inmate’s movement and sections 33, 35 to 37.4 and 37.81 to 37.83 apply with any necessary modifications in respect of the inmate as though the inmate were in a structured intervention unit. However, the opportunity referred to in paragraph 36(1)(b) is to be provided only if the circumstances permit.Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(3)) Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the following amendment to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act: That Bill C-83, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 10 on page 11 with the following:37.6 (1) The Minister shall appoint one or more persons to be independent external decision-makers.(2) To be eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker, a person must have knowledge of administrative decision-making processes in general. A person is not eligible for appointment as an independent external decision-maker if the person was, at any time, in the previous five years a staff member or appointed under subsection 6(1).(3) An independent external decision-maker is to be appointed for a renewable term of not more than five years and holds office during good behaviour, but may be removed at any time for cause by the Minister.(4) An independent external decision-maker may be appointed to serve either full-time or part-time.37.61 An independent external decision-maker is to be paid(a) the remuneration that is fixed by the Treasury Board; and(b) in accordance with Treasury Board directives, any travel and living expenses that they incur in the performance of their duties and functions while absent from their ordinary place of work, in the case of a full-time decision-maker, and their ordinary place of residence, in the case of a part-time decision-maker.37.7 (1) The Service shall furnish to an independent external decision-maker all information under the Service’s control that is relevant to the making of a determination in respect of an inmate by the independent external decision-maker.(2) For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may require any staff member, or any person whose services are engaged by or on behalf of the Service,(a) to furnish any information that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, the staff member or person may be able to furnish in relation to the inmate’s case; and(b) to produce, for examination by the decision-maker, any document or thing that, in the decision-maker’s opinion, relates to the inmate’s case and that may be in the possession or under the control of the staff member or person.(3) Within 10 days after the day on which an independent external decision-maker makes a determination, the decision-maker shall return to the Service any document or thing furnished under subsection (1) or paragraph (2)(a) or produced under paragraph (2)(b), as well as any copy of one.37.71 (1) Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall provide or cause to be provided to the inmate, in writing, in whichever of the two official languages of Canada is requested by the inmate, the information that is to be considered by the decision-maker or a summary of that information, other than information provided to the independent external decision-maker by the inmate.(2) The independent external decision-maker may withhold from the inmate as much information as is strictly necessary if the independent external decision-maker has reasonable grounds to believe that(a) the information should not be disclosed on the grounds of public interest; or(b) the disclosure of the information would jeopardize the safety of any person, the security of a penitentiary or the conduct of any lawful investigation.37.72 Before making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker shall ensure that the inmate is given an opportunity to make written representations to the independent external decision-maker.37.73 For the purpose of making a determination in respect of an inmate, an independent external decision-maker may communicate with the inmate.37.74 (1) Subject to subsection (2), an independent external decision-maker shall not disclose any information that comes to their knowledge in the course of the exercise of their powers, or the performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.(2) An independent external decision-maker may disclose information referred to in subsection (1) in the exercise of their powers or the performance of their duties and functions.37.75 An independent external decision-maker is not a competent or compellable witness in any civil proceedings in respect of any matter coming to their knowledge in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of their powers, or the performance or purported performance of their duties and functions, under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.76 No criminal or civil proceedings lie against an independent external decision-maker for anything done, reported or said in good faith in the course of the exercise or purported exercise of any power, or the performance or purported performance of any duty or function, of the independent external decision-maker under this Act or any other Act of Parliament.37.77 An independent external decision-maker may, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), publish or otherwise disseminate information, other than personal information, relating to any determination made by the independent external decision-maker.37.8 Thirty days after each of the Commissioner’s determinations under section 37.4 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit, an independent external decision-maker shall, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit.37.81 If a committee established under subsection 37.31(3) determines that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit or determines that an inmate’s conditions of confinement in the structured intervention unit should not be altered in accordance with a recommendation of a registered health care professional under section 37.2, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, in accordance with regulations made under paragraph 96(g.1), determine whether the inmate should remain in the unit or whether the inmate’s conditions of confinement in the unit should be altered.37.82 (1) The independent external decision-maker may determine under sections 37.8 and 37.81 that an inmate should remain in a structured intervention unit only if the independent external decision-maker believes on reasonable grounds that allowing the inmate’s reintegration into the mainstream inmate population(a) would jeopardize the safety of the inmate or any other person or the security of the penitentiary; or(b) would interfere with an investigation that could lead to a criminal charge or a charge under subsection 41(2) of a serious disciplinary offence.(2) In making the determination, the independent external decision-maker shall take into account(a) the inmate’s correctional plan;(b) the appropriateness of the inmate’s confinement in the penitentiary;(c) the appropriateness of the inmate’s security classification; and(d) any other consideration that he or she considers relevant.37.83 (1) If, for five consecutive days or for a total of 15 days during any 30-day period, an inmate confined in a structured intervention unit has not spent a minimum of four hours a day outside the inmate’s cell or has not interacted, for a minimum of two hours a day, with others, an independent external decision-maker shall, as soon as practicable, determine whether the Service has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1) and to encourage the inmate to avail themselves of those opportunities.(2) If the independent external decision-maker determines that the Service has not taken all reasonable steps, he or she may make any recommendation to the Service that he or she considers appropriate to remedy the situation.(3) If the Service, within the period of seven days commencing on the day on which it receives recommendations, fails to satisfy the independent external decision-maker that it has taken all reasonable steps to provide the inmate with the opportunities referred to in subsection 36(1), the independent external decision-maker shall direct the Service to remove the inmate from the structured intervention unit and provide a notice of the direction to the Correctional Investigator as defined in Part III.37.9 An independent external decision-maker may, in the prescribed circumstances, make a prescribed determination or review in the prescribed manner.37.91 (1) The transfer of an inmate to a structured intervention unit must be completed not later than five working days after the day on which the authorization for the transfer is given. Until the transfer is completed, the Service may impose restrictions on the inmate’s movement and sections 33, 35 to 37.4 and 37.81 to 37.83 apply with any necessary modifications in respect of the inmate as though the inmate were in a structured intervention unit. However, the opportunity referred to in paragraph 36(1)(b) is to be provided only if the circumstances permit.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDamoff, PamGovernment billsLiberal CaucusReport stageReport stage motions57879885787989//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 18, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 11.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787990//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 19, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 14.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787991//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 20, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 29.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787992//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 21, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 31.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787993//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/88884PamDamoffPam-DamoffOakville North—BurlingtonLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/DamoffPam_lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMs. Damoff (Oakville North—Burlington), seconded by Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved Motion No. 22, — That Bill C-83, in Clause 31, be amended by replacing lines 34 to 36 on page 17 with the following:(g.1) respecting the powers, duties and functions of independent external decision-makers, including respecting the making of a determination as to whether the conditions of confinement of an inmate in a structured intervention unit should be altered or as to whether an inmate should remain in such a unit;(2) Section 96 of the Act is amended by adding the following after paragraph (g.1):(g.2) respecting the admission of inmates to and theC-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDamoff, PamGovernment billsLiberal CaucusReport stageReport stage motions5787994//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 23, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 32.1.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787995//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 24, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 33.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787996//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 25, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 36.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787997//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 26, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 39.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787998//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable), moved Motion No. 27, — That Bill C-83 be amended by deleting Clause 40.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReport stageReport stage motions5787999-Government OrdersStart consideration on a groupDebate arose on the motions in Group No. 1.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsReport stageReport stage motions5788000-Government OrdersStart Report Stage considerationThe Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security with amendments.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsReport stage5729156-Government OrdersSpeaker’s rulingPursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:Group No. 1 — Motions Nos. 1 to 27.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDecisions of the SpeakerGovernment billsReport stageReport stage motions5729157//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/89000BardishChaggerHon.Bardish-ChaggerWaterlooLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/ChaggerBardish_Lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationNotice having been given at a previous sitting under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Intergovernmental and Northern Affairs and Internal Trade), moved, — That, in relation to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, not more than one further sitting day shall be allotted to the consideration at second reading stage of the Bill; andThat, 15 minutes before the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on the day allotted to the consideration at second reading stage of the said Bill, any proceedings before the House shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this Order, and, in turn, every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the Bill shall be put forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment.Pursuant to Standing Order 67.1, the House proceeded to the question period regarding the moving of the time allocation motion.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActChagger, BardishGovernment billsLeader of the Government in the House of CommonsLiberal CaucusMotionsSecond readingTime allocation559362855936295593630-Government OrdersDecision MadeThe question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 898 -- Vote no 898)YEAS: 150, NAYS: 117YEAS -- POURAldagAmosAnandasangareeArseneaultAryaAyoubBadaweyBagnellBaylisBennettBibeauBittleBlairBoissonnaultBossioBretonBrisonCaesar-ChavannesCasey (Cumberland—Colchester)Casey (Charlottetown)ChaggerChampagneCuznerDabrusinDamoffDeCourceyDhaliwalDhillonDubourgDuguidDzerowiczEasterEhsassiEl-KhouryErskine-SmithEykingFergusFillmoreFinniganFisherFragiskatosFraser (West Nova)Fraser (Central Nova)FryFuhrGarneauGerretsenGoldsmith-JonesGouldGrahamGrewalHajduHardieHarveyHébertHoggHollandHousefatherHussenHutchingsIaconoJonesJordanJowhariKhalidKheraLambropoulosLamettiLamoureuxLapointeLauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation)LeBlancLebouthillierLevittLightboundLockhartLongLongfieldLudwigMacAulay (Cardigan)MacKinnon (Gatineau)MaloneyMassé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia)May (Cambridge)McCrimmonMcDonaldMcGuintyMcKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam)McLeod (Northwest Territories)MendèsMendicinoMihychukMiller (Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs)MonsefMorrisseyMurrayNassifNaultNgOliphantOliverO'ReganOuellettePetersonPhilpottPicardPoissantQualtroughRatansiRiouxRobillardRodriguezRogersRomanadoRotaRuddRuimyRusnakSahotaSainiSajjanSanghaSaraiScarpaleggiaSchiefkeSchulteSerréSgroSheehanSidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon)Sidhu (Brampton South)SikandSimmsSohiSorbaraSpengemannTabbaraTanTassiTootooVandalVandenbeldVaughanViraniWhalenWilson-RaybouldWrzesnewskyjYipYoungZahid -- 150NAYS -- CONTREAboultaifAlbasAlbrechtAlleslevAndersonAngusArnoldAubinBarlowBarsalou-DuvalBeaulieuBensonBenzenBergenBertholdBezanBlaikieBlaney (Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis)BlockBoutin-SweetBrassardBrosseauCalkinsCanningsCaronCarrieChongClarkeClementCooperDaviesDeltellDiotteDohertyDonnellyDreeshenDubéDuvallEglinskiFalk (Battlefords—Lloydminster)Falk (Provencher)FinleyGallantGarrisonGénéreuxGenuisGladuHardcastleHarderHobackHughesJenerouxJoliboisKellyKentKmiecKusieKwanLakeLaverdièreLiepertLobbLukiwskiMacGregorMacKenzieMaguireMarcilMartelMasse (Windsor West)MathyssenMay (Saanich—Gulf Islands)McCauley (Edmonton West)McColemanMcLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)MooreMotzNantelNaterNuttallObhraiO'ToolePaul-HusPauzéPlamondonQuachRamseyRankinRayesReidRempelRichardsSansoucySaroyaSchmaleShieldsShipleySopuckSorensonStantonStetskiStrahlStubbsSweetThériaultTilsonTrostTrudelVan KesterenViersenWarawaWarkentinWaughWebberWeirWongYurdigaZimmer -- 117PAIRED -- PAIRÉSNil--AucunC-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 898Government billsMotionsRecorded divisionsSecond readingTime allocation5593631-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationThe House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Ms. McKenna (Minister of Environment and Climate Change), — That Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security;And of the amendment of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: “the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, since the Bill prioritizes the rights of Canada’s most violent and dangerous criminals over safety and victims’ rights by eliminating the use of solitary confinement, a common measure many Western countries take to protect guards from dangerous and volatile prisoners, and since the principle of the Bill fails to end the practice of allowing child killers, like Terri-Lynn McClintic, to be transferred to healing lodges instead of being kept behind bars.”.The debate continued.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessPaul-Hus, PierreReasoned amendmentsSecond reading5593632559363355936345593635-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationThe House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Ms. McKenna (Minister of Environment and Climate Change), — That Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security;And of the amendment of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: “the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, since the Bill prioritizes the rights of Canada’s most violent and dangerous criminals over safety and victims’ rights by eliminating the use of solitary confinement, a common measure many Western countries take to protect guards from dangerous and volatile prisoners, and since the principle of the Bill fails to end the practice of allowing child killers, like Terri-Lynn McClintic, to be transferred to healing lodges instead of being kept behind bars.”.The debate continued.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsReasoned amendmentsSecond reading5593638559363955936405593641-Government OrdersDecision MadeThe question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division: (Division No. 899 -- Vote no 899)YEAS: 84, NAYS: 198YEAS -- POURAboultaifAlbasAlbrechtAlleslevAllisonAndersonArnoldBarlowBenzenBergenBernierBertholdBezanBlaney (Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis)BlockBrassardCalkinsCarrieChongClarkeClementCooperDeltellDiotteDohertyDreeshenEglinskiFalk (Battlefords—Lloydminster)Falk (Provencher)FastFinleyGallantGénéreuxGenuisGladuHarderHobackJenerouxKellyKentKmiecKusieLakeLauzon (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry)LiepertLloydLobbLukiwskiMacKenzieMaguireMartelMcColemanMcLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)MotzNaterNicholsonNuttallObhraiO'ToolePaul-HusPoilievreRayesReidRempelSaroyaSchmaleShipleySopuckSorensonStantonStrahlStubbsSweetTilsonTrostVecchioViersenWarawaWarkentinWaughWebberWongYurdigaZimmer -- 84NAYS -- CONTREAldagAlghabraAmosAnandasangareeAngusArseneaultAryaAshtonAubinAyoubBadaweyBagnellBainsBarsalou-DuvalBaylisBeaulieuBennettBensonBibeauBittleBlaikieBlairBoissonnaultBossioBoudriasBoulericeBoutin-SweetBretonBrisonBrosseauCaesar-ChavannesCanningsCaronCasey (Cumberland—Colchester)Casey (Charlottetown)ChaggerChampagneChristophersonCullenCuznerDabrusinDamoffDaviesDeCourceyDhaliwalDhillonDonnellyDubéDubourgDuguidDuncan (Etobicoke North)DuvallDzerowiczEasterEhsassiEl-KhouryErskine-SmithEykingFergusFillmoreFinniganFisherFonsecaFragiskatosFraser (West Nova)Fraser (Central Nova)FryFuhrGarrisonGerretsenGillGoldsmith-JonesGouldGrewalHajduHardcastleHardieHarveyHébertHoggHollandHousefatherHughesHussenHutchingsIaconoJoliboisJonesJordanJowhariJulianKangKhalidKheraKwanLambropoulosLamettiLamoureuxLapointeLauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation)LeBlancLebouthillierLefebvreLevittLightboundLongLongfieldLudwigMacAulay (Cardigan)MacGregorMacKinnon (Gatineau)MaloneyMarcilMasse (Windsor West)Massé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia)MathyssenMay (Cambridge)May (Saanich—Gulf Islands)McCrimmonMcDonaldMcKayMcKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam)McLeod (Northwest Territories)MendèsMendicinoMihychukMiller (Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs)MonsefMooreMorrisseyMurrayNantelNassifNaultNgO'ConnellOliphantOliverO'ReganOuellettePauzéPetersonPhilpottPicardPlamondonPoissantQuachQualtroughRamseyRankinRatansiRiouxRobillardRodriguezRogersRomanadoRotaRuddRuimyRusnakSahotaSainiSajjanSanghaSansoucySaraiScarpaleggiaSchiefkeSchulteSerréSgroSheehanSidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon)Sidhu (Brampton South)SikandSimmsSohiSorbaraSpengemannSte-MarieStetskiTabbaraTanTassiThériaultTootooTrudelVandalVandenbeldVaughanViraniWeirWhalenWilson-RaybouldWrzesnewskyjYipYoungZahid -- 198PAIRED -- PAIRÉSCormierFortin -- 2C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 899Government billsReasoned amendmentsRecorded divisionsSecond reading5593643-Government OrdersDecision MadeThe question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 900 -- Vote no 900)YEAS: 164, NAYS: 117YEAS -- POURAldagAlghabraAmosAnandasangareeArseneaultAryaAyoubBadaweyBagnellBainsBarsalou-DuvalBaylisBeaulieuBennettBibeauBittleBlairBoissonnaultBossioBoudriasBretonBrisonCaesar-ChavannesCasey (Cumberland—Colchester)Casey (Charlottetown)ChaggerChampagneCuznerDabrusinDamoffDeCourceyDhaliwalDhillonDubourgDuguidDuncan (Etobicoke North)DzerowiczEasterEhsassiEl-KhouryErskine-SmithEykingFergusFillmoreFinniganFisherFonsecaFragiskatosFraser (West Nova)Fraser (Central Nova)FryFuhrGerretsenGillGoldsmith-JonesGouldGrewalHajduHardieHarveyHébertHoggHollandHousefatherHussenHutchingsIaconoJonesJordanJowhariKangKhalidKheraLambropoulosLamettiLamoureuxLapointeLauzon (Argenteuil—La Petite-Nation)LeBlancLebouthillierLefebvreLevittLightboundLongLongfieldLudwigMacAulay (Cardigan)MacKinnon (Gatineau)MaloneyMarcilMassé (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia)May (Cambridge)May (Saanich—Gulf Islands)McCrimmonMcDonaldMcKayMcKinnon (Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam)McLeod (Northwest Territories)MendèsMendicinoMihychukMiller (Ville-Marie—Le Sud-Ouest—Île-des-Soeurs)MonsefMorrisseyMurrayNassifNaultNgO'ConnellOliphantOliverO'ReganOuellettePauzéPetersonPhilpottPicardPlamondonPoissantQualtroughRatansiRiouxRobillardRodriguezRogersRomanadoRotaRuddRuimyRusnakSahotaSainiSajjanSanghaSaraiScarpaleggiaSchiefkeSchulteSerréSgroSheehanSidhu (Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon)Sidhu (Brampton South)SikandSimmsSohiSorbaraSpengemannSte-MarieTabbaraTanTassiThériaultTootooVandalVandenbeldVaughanViraniWhalenWilson-RaybouldWrzesnewskyjYipYoungZahid -- 164NAYS -- CONTREAboultaifAlbasAlbrechtAlleslevAllisonAndersonAngusArnoldAshtonAubinBarlowBensonBenzenBergenBernierBertholdBezanBlaikieBlaney (Bellechasse—Les Etchemins—Lévis)BlockBoulericeBoutin-SweetBrassardBrosseauCalkinsCanningsCaronCarrieChongChristophersonClarkeClementCooperCullenDaviesDeltellDiotteDohertyDonnellyDreeshenDubéDuvallEglinskiFalk (Battlefords—Lloydminster)Falk (Provencher)FastFinleyGallantGarrisonGénéreuxGenuisGladuHardcastleHarderHobackHughesJenerouxJoliboisJulianKellyKentKmiecKusieKwanLakeLauzon (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry)LiepertLloydLobbLukiwskiMacGregorMacKenzieMaguireMartelMasse (Windsor West)MathyssenMcColemanMcLeod (Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo)MooreMotzNantelNaterNicholsonNuttallObhraiO'ToolePaul-HusPoilievreQuachRamseyRankinRayesReidRempelSansoucySaroyaSchmaleShipleySopuckSorensonStantonStetskiStrahlStubbsSweetTilsonTrostTrudelVecchioViersenWarawaWarkentinWaughWebberWongYurdigaZimmer -- 117PAIRED -- PAIRÉSCormierFortin -- 2Accordingly, Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, was read the second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 900Government billsRecorded divisionsReferred to Committee after second readingSecond readingStanding Committee on Public Safety and National Security56148805614881-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationThe House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Ms. McKenna (Minister of Environment and Climate Change), — That Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security;And of the amendment of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: “the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, since the Bill prioritizes the rights of Canada’s most violent and dangerous criminals over safety and victims’ rights by eliminating the use of solitary confinement, a common measure many Western countries take to protect guards from dangerous and volatile prisoners, and since the principle of the Bill fails to end the practice of allowing child killers, like Terri-Lynn McClintic, to be transferred to healing lodges instead of being kept behind bars.”.The debate continued.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessPaul-Hus, PierreReasoned amendmentsSecond reading5589712558971355897145589715-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationThe House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Ms. McKenna (Minister of Environment and Climate Change), — That Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security;And of the amendment of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: “the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, since the Bill prioritizes the rights of Canada’s most violent and dangerous criminals over safety and victims’ rights by eliminating the use of solitary confinement, a common measure many Western countries take to protect guards from dangerous and volatile prisoners, and since the principle of the Bill fails to end the practice of allowing child killers, like Terri-Lynn McClintic, to be transferred to healing lodges instead of being kept behind bars.”.The debate continued.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsReasoned amendmentsSecond reading5589730558973155897325589733//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/89000BardishChaggerHon.Bardish-ChaggerWaterlooLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/ChaggerBardish_Lib.jpgNotice of MotionTime allocation - notice givenMs. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) gave notice of the intention to move a motion at the next sitting of the House, pursuant to Standing Order 78(3), for the purpose of allotting a specified number of days or hours for the consideration and disposal of the second reading stage of Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act. C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActChagger, BardishGovernment billsLeader of the Government in the House of CommonsLiberal CaucusNotice of motionSecond readingTime allocation5589734//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/1265RalphGoodaleHon.Ralph-GoodaleRegina—WascanaLiberal CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/42/GoodaleRalph_Lib.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationThe Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security of Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act.Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Ms. McKenna (Minister of Environment and Climate Change), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security.Debate arose thereon.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGoodale, RalphGovernment billsLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessSecond reading558549155854925585493//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/71454PierrePaul-HusPierre-Paul-HusCharlesbourg—Haute-Saint-CharlesConservative CaucusQuebec//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/PaulHusPierre_CPC.jpgGovernment OrdersStart ConsiderationMr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: “the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, since the Bill prioritizes the rights of Canada’s most violent and dangerous criminals over safety and victims’ rights by eliminating the use of solitary confinement, a common measure many Western countries take to protect guards from dangerous and volatile prisoners, and since the principle of the Bill fails to end the practice of allowing child killers, like Terri-Lynn McClintic, to be transferred to healing lodges instead of being kept behind bars.”.Debate arose thereon.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActConservative CaucusGovernment billsPaul-Hus, PierreReasoned amendmentsSecond reading558549455854955585496-Government OrdersResume ConsiderationThe House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Ms. McKenna (Minister of Environment and Climate Change), — That Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security;And of the amendment of Mr. Paul-Hus (Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles), seconded by Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following: “the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, since the Bill prioritizes the rights of Canada’s most violent and dangerous criminals over safety and victims’ rights by eliminating the use of solitary confinement, a common measure many Western countries take to protect guards from dangerous and volatile prisoners, and since the principle of the Bill fails to end the practice of allowing child killers, like Terri-Lynn McClintic, to be transferred to healing lodges instead of being kept behind bars.”.The debate continued.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActGovernment billsReasoned amendmentsSecond reading5585499558550055855015585502-Daily Routine Of BusinessIntroduction of Government BillsDecision MadePursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Goodale (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), seconded by Mr. Carr (Minister of International Trade Diversification), Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another ActCorrectional servicesGoodale, RalphGovernment billsImprisonment and prisonersIntroduction and First readingLiberal CaucusMinister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness5583276INTERVENTIONParliament and SessionOrder of BusinessTopicProcedural TermSearchResults per pageOrder byTarget search languageSide by SideMaximum returned rowsPagePUBLICATION TYPE