Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 51 of 51
2019-06-14 [p.5595]
Q-2440 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to “March madness” expenditures where the government makes purchases before the end of the fiscal year so that departmental funds do not go “unspent”, broken down by department agency or other government entity: (a) what were the total expenditures during February and March of 2019 on (i) materials and supplies (standard object 07), (ii) acquisition of machinery and equipment, including parts and consumable tools (standard object 09); and (b) what are the details of each such expenditure, including (i) vendor, (ii) amount, (iii) date of expenditure, (iv) description of goods or services provided, including quantity, (v) delivery date, (vi) file number? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2440.
2019-06-14 [p.5595]
Q-2441 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to government expenditures on membership fees, broken down by department, agency and Crown corporation, since April 1, 2018: (a) how much has been spent; and (b) what are the details of each expenditure, including (i) name of organization or vendor, (ii) date of purchase, (iii) amount spent? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2441.
2019-06-05 [p.5453]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning the grain industry (No. 421-04138);
2019-05-03 [p.5232]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning the grain industry (No. 421-03502);
2019-04-05 [p.5091]
Q-2219 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to federal spending within the electoral district of Perth—Wellington for each fiscal year from 2015-16 to 2017-18: what is the list of grants, loans, contributions and contracts awarded by the government, broken down by (i) department and agency, (ii) municipality, (iii) name of recipient, (iv) amount received, (v) program under which the spending was made, (vi) date? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2219.
2019-03-22 [p.5044]
By unanimous consent, Mr. Vaughan (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Families, Children and Social Development) laid upon the Table, — Copy of a Tweet from Mrs. Caesar-Chavannes (Whitby) to Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) (English text only). — Sessional Paper No. 8530-421-264.
2019-03-18 [p.4699]
Q-2168 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the new ministries announced in 2018, including Export Promotion and Organized Crime and Border Security: what is the total of all costs associated with creating each ministry, including the costs for any office renovations resulting from the creation of the ministries, broken down by line item and ministry? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2168.
2019-02-20 [p.4599]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning organ transplants (No. 421-03242);
2019-01-28 [p.4500]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), seconded by Mr. MacKenzie (Oxford), Bill C-424, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (sexual exploitation), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2019-01-28 [p.4501]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning organ transplants (No. 421-03123);
2019-01-28 [p.4514]
Q-2082 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the $6 million budget for the Leader’s Debates Commission: what is the breakdown of how the $6 million is projected to be spent by standard object and line item? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2082.
2019-01-28 [p.4525]
Q-2138 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to government and Canadian Armed Forces policies for the Vimy Officers’ Mess in Kingston, Ontario: (a) on what date was the booking accepted by the Department of National Defence or the Canadian Armed Forces for the December 19, 2018, Liberal Party fundraising event with the Prime Minister, which was subsequently cancelled; (b) what is the title of the individual who initially accepted the booking; (c) did the Privy Council Office advise the Office of the Prime Minister that attending a partisan event on Canadian Armed Forces property violated government policy and, if so, when was such advice given; and (d) why did the Prime Minister initially agree to attend an event which was in violation of government policy? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2138.
2018-12-13 [p.4475]
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), seconded by Mr. O'Toole (Durham), moved, — That an Order of the House do issue for a copy of the guest list for the reception which occurred at the residence of the High Commissioner of Canada in India, in New Delhi, on February 22, 2018. (Notice of Motion for the Production of Papers P-15)
2018-12-10 [p.4443]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning organ transplants (No. 421-03062);
2018-12-06 [p.4427]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the return to the following question made into an Order for Return:
Q-2001 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the government’s decision not to provide costs associated with legal assistance to Vice-Admiral Mark Norman: (a) who made the decision to deny legal assistance costs; (b) was the decision in (a) supported by the Minister of National Defence; (c) on what date was the decision in (a) made; and (d) which Ministers, exempt staff, or other government employees have or will receive taxpayer-funded legal assistance in relation to the case? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-2001.
2018-12-03 [p.4391]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning organ transplants (No. 421-03024);
2018-11-26 [p.4340]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning organ transplants (No. 421-02949);
2018-11-05 [p.4227]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning organ transplants (No. 421-02884);
2018-11-05 [p.4237]
Q-1920 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to government expenditures related to guarding and relocating the killdeer nest which was found near the Canadian War Museum in June 2018: (a) what was the total cost; (b) what are the details of each expenditure, including (i) vendor, (ii) amount, (iii) description of goods or services provided; (c) how many government employees contributed to the relocation; and (d) what is the total number of hours dedicated by government employees to the relocation? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1920.
2018-10-23 [p.4096]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning organ transplants (No. 421-02800);
2018-06-20 [p.3872]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning discrimination (No. 421-02565);
2018-06-18 [p.3825]
Q-1746 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to information sharing between the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) and the Canada Council for the Arts: is being designated a professional artist by the Canada Council for the Arts sufficient proof in order to prevent the CRA from declaring an individual to be a “hobby artist”? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1746.
2018-06-08 [p.3567]
Q-1689 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the ministerial and executive vehicle fleet: (a) how many new vehicles have been purchased for the fleet since November 4, 2015; (b) for each purchase, (i) what was the date, (ii) what was the price, (iii) what was the make and model, (iv) was the vehicle electric, hybrid or traditional, (v) which Minister or executive was assigned to the vehicle; and (c) what is the total amount spent on such purchases since November 4, 2015? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1689.
2018-05-23 [p.3268]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Gould (Minister of Democratic Institutions), seconded by Mrs. Philpott (Minister of Indigenous Services), — That Bill C-76, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make certain consequential amendments, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs;
And of the amendment of Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), seconded by Mr. Albrecht (Kitchener—Conestoga), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-76, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make certain consequential amendments, since the Bill fails to address the high error rate in the National Register of Electors, and the high rate of erroneous Voter Identification Cards, reported at 986,613 instances in the 2015 election, and does nothing to deal with foreign interference in Canadian elections because the Bill proposes to double the total maximum third party spending amount allowed during the writ period and to continue to allow unlimited contributions in the period prior to the pre-writ period.”.
The debate continued.
2018-05-22 [p.3255]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Gould (Minister of Democratic Institutions), seconded by Mrs. Philpott (Minister of Indigenous Services), — That Bill C-76, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make certain consequential amendments, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs;
And of the amendment of Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), seconded by Mr. Albrecht (Kitchener—Conestoga), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-76, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make certain consequential amendments, since the Bill fails to address the high error rate in the National Register of Electors, and the high rate of erroneous Voter Identification Cards, reported at 986,613 instances in the 2015 election, and does nothing to deal with foreign interference in Canadian elections because the Bill proposes to double the total maximum third party spending amount allowed during the writ period and to continue to allow unlimited contributions in the period prior to the pre-writ period.”.
The debate continued.
2018-05-11 [p.3243]
Q-1612 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the contract awarded by Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada to Ernst & Young for $1,001,998 for the development of an Internal Trade Barriers (ITB) Index, to be delivered on December 31, 2016: (a) was the ITB ever completed; (b) if the answer to (a) is affirmative, how can the public access the index; (c) if the answer to (a) is negative, was the contract cancelled, and if so, why; and (d) if the contract was cancelled, or has not been fulfilled, then what specific action is the government taking to recover the money paid to Ernst & Young? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1612.
2018-05-11 [p.3244]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Gould (Minister of Democratic Institutions), seconded by Mrs. Philpott (Minister of Indigenous Services), — That Bill C-76, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make certain consequential amendments, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs;
And of the amendment of Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), seconded by Mr. Albrecht (Kitchener—Conestoga), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-76, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make certain consequential amendments, since the Bill fails to address the high error rate in the National Register of Electors, and the high rate of erroneous Voter Identification Cards, reported at 986,613 instances in the 2015 election, and does nothing to deal with foreign interference in Canadian elections because the Bill proposes to double the total maximum third party spending amount allowed during the writ period and to continue to allow unlimited contributions in the period prior to the pre-writ period.”.
The debate continued.
2018-05-10 [p.3237]
Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), seconded by Mr. Albrecht (Kitchener—Conestoga), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-76, An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act and other Acts and to make certain consequential amendments, since the Bill fails to address the high error rate in the National Register of Electors, and the high rate of erroneous Voter Identification Cards, reported at 986,613 instances in the 2015 election, and does nothing to deal with foreign interference in Canadian elections because the Bill proposes to double the total maximum third party spending amount allowed during the writ period and to continue to allow unlimited contributions in the period prior to the pre-writ period.”.
Debate arose thereon.
2018-04-24 [p.3143]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning the protection of the environment (No. 421-02258);
2018-04-16 [p.3092]
Q-1525 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to Commonwealth Heads of Government Meetings related to succession plans: (a) how was Louise Fréchette chosen to be Canada’s representative at the meetings; (b) to which department, agency, or government entity does Ms. Fréchette report; (c) is Ms. Fréchette considered an employee of the department, agency, or government entity in (b); (d) what instruction has the government provided to Canada’s representative at the meetings; and (e) what is Canada’s official position regarding succession plans for the Head of the Commonwealth? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1525.
2018-03-29 [p.3063]
Q-1500 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the agreement announced by the government in September 2016, related to the export of beef to China: (a) what are the terms of the agreement; and (b) is the text of the agreement available to the public and to Canadian beef producers, and, if so, what is the website location of the agreement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1500.
2018-03-21 [p.2783]
Q-1474 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the Government’s response to petition 421-01929: (a) in respect of the comment that the “Government promised to bring real change to Parliament and remains committed to fulfilling that promise”, what changes remain outstanding and when will each change be pursued; (b) in respect of the comment that parliamentary secretaries “provide a direct link to ministers” by sitting on committees, have any parliamentary secretaries shared with ministers, their staff, or their relevant department, any confidential information from in camera committee meetings; (c) if the answer to (b) is affirmative, what are the details (without revealing the in camera information), including (i) date the information was shared, (ii) with whom it was shared, (iii) was the relevant committee notified; (d) what is each Minister’s policy regarding the provision of in camera information by their Parliamentary Secretary; and (e) in respect of the comment that the “Government is working with all Members of Parliament to implement these changes”, what are the particulars of these efforts? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1474.
2018-01-29 [p.2603]
Q-1342 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to Article 1103 of the Canadian Free Trade Agreement and Article 809 of the Agreement on Internal Trade: (a) what are the details of each meeting of the Working Group on Alcoholic Beverages since July 1, 2017, including (i) date, (ii) list of attendees, (iii) agenda items, (iv) decisions and agreements reached; (b) what are the details of each meeting of the Working Group on Party-Specific Exceptions since July 1, 2017, including (i) date, (ii) list of attendees, (iii) agenda items, (iv) decisions and agreements reached; and (c) what are the details of each meeting of the Working Group on Party-Specific Exceptions since November 4, 2015, including (i) date, (ii) list of attendees, (iii) agenda items, (iv) decisions and agreements reached? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1342.
2018-01-29 [p.2605]
Q-1349 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the government expenditures on and policy towards sharing economy products, including Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb, since November 4, 2015, and broken down by department and agency: (a) what is each department and agency's policy regarding employees using such products or services while on government business; (b) what are the total expenditures, broken down by month, on (i) Uber, (ii) Lyft, (iii) Airbnb, for government employees; (c) what are the total expenditures, including a monthly breakdown, for ministers, parliamentary secretaries and ministerial exempt staff on (i) Uber, (ii) Lyft, (iii) Airbnb; and (d) what is the total amount spent by government employees, broken down by month, on (i) taxis, (ii) hotels? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1349.
2017-12-11 [p.2548]
Q-1273 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the statutory responsibilities of ministers: what are the statutory responsibilities of (i) the Minister of Small Business and Tourism, (ii) the Minister of La Francophonie, (iii) the Minister of Science, (iv) the Minister of Sport and Persons with Disabilities, (v) the Minister of Status of Women, (vi) the Minister of Indigenous Services? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1273.
2017-09-18 [p.2109]
Q-1055 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the Prime Minister's nominee for Commissioner of Official Languages, announced on May 15, 2017: (a) on what date did a Cabinet Minister or a representative of a Cabinet Minister inform Madeleine Meilleur that she had been selected as the Prime Minister's likely nominee; (b) how was Madeleine Meilleur informed that she had been selected as the Prime Minister's nominee; (c) who informed Madeleine Meilleur that she had been selected as the Prime Minister's nominee; (d) what communication has the government had with Madeleine Meilleur regarding her appointment to any position within the government since November 4, 2015, including (i) positions discussed, (ii) dates of contact, (iii) methods of communication, (iv) names of relevant Cabinet Ministers and representatives of Cabinet Ministers; and (e) since November 4, 2015, which Cabinet Ministers have put forward Madeleine Meilleur’s name as a potential candidate for a government appointment and what are the details of each of these recommendations including (i) date, (ii) recommended position, (iii) other relevant details? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1055.
2017-06-16 [p.1978]
Q-1010 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to government procurement and contracts for the provision of research or speechwriting services to ministers since September 20, 2016: (a) what are the details of contracts, including (i) the start and end dates, (ii) contracting parties, (iii) file number, (iv) nature or description of the work, (v) value of contract; and (b) in the case of a contract for speechwriting, what is the (i) date, (ii) location, (iii) audience or event at which the speech was, or was intended to be, delivered, (iv) number of speeches to be written, (v) cost charged per speech? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1010.
2017-06-16 [p.1978]
Q-1011 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to spending by the government on private investigators since November 4, 2015, broken down by department, agency, Crown Corporation, or other government entity: what are the details of each expenditure including for each the (i) vendor, (ii) amount of contract, (iii) date, (iv) file number, (v) situation overview or reason for investigation, (vi) finding of investigation, if completed? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1011.
2017-06-16 [p.1978]
Q-1012 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to Budget 2017 and to contracts signed by the government with McKinsey and Company, its partners or consultants, since November 4, 2015, for each contract: (a) what is the (i) value, (ii) description of the service provided, (iii) date and duration, (iv) internal tracking or file number; (b) was the contract sole sourced; (c) what specific role did McKinsey and Company, its partners or consultants, or Dominic Barton play in the preparation of Budget 2017; (d) what specific sections of Budget 2017 were prepared by, in whole or in part, by McKinsey and Company, its partners or consultants; and (e) what are the details of any briefing notes or memorandums regarding Budget 2017, McKinsey and Company, its partners or consultants, or Dominic Barton, including for each the (i) sender, (ii) recipients, (iii) title and subject matter, (iv) date, (v) internal file or tracking number? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-1012.
2017-05-02 [p.1646]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), seconded by Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock), — That the question of privilege regarding the free movement of Members of Parliament within the Parliamentary Precinct raised on Wednesday, March 22, 2017, be referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs;
And of the amendment of Mr. Sorenson (Battle River—Crowfoot), seconded by Mr. McColeman (Brantford—Brant), — That the motion be amended by adding the following:
“and that the Committee make this matter a priority over all other business including its review of the Standing Orders and Procedure of the House and its committees.”;
And of the subamendment of Mr. Lukiwski (Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan), seconded by Mr. Albrecht (Kitchener—Conestoga), — That the amendment be amended by adding the following:
“, provided that the Committee report back no later than June 19, 2017.”.
The debate continued.
2017-05-01 [p.1636]
Q-905 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the Access to Information Act, since November 4, 2015: (a) how many times has the Privy Council Office, the Office of the Prime Minister, or the Treasury Board Secretariat provided guidance, including directives, advice, memorandums, clarifications, and interpretations regarding Access to Information requests or the implementation of the Act; and (b) for each instance in (a), what are the details, including (i) date, (ii) title, (iii) contents, (iv) departments that received the guidance, (v) individuals who provided the guidance, (vi) relevant file numbers, if applicable? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-905.
2017-04-10 [p.1609]
Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), seconded by Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge), moved, — That this House do now adjourn.
2017-04-03 [p.1552]
Q-864 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to aircraft usage by the Canadian Embassy and Consulate in Ukraine and by the Canadian Embassy in Poland between May 25, 2016, and July 13, 2016, excluding regularly scheduled commercial flights: (a) what flights or aircraft rental were paid for or utilized by the embassies or consulate; (b) what were the costs associated with each flight or aircraft rental; and (c) what were the details of each flight, including (i) date, (ii) departure location, (iii) arrival location, (iv) list of passengers, (v) type of aircraft? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-864.
2017-01-30 [p.1239]
Q-645 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to the mydemocracy.ca website: (a) what is the value of the contract the government has with Vox Pop Labs; (b) what specific services are being provided by Vox Pop Labs to the government; (c) what are the titles of the individuals who came up with the questions for the site, broken down by department; (d) what is the rationale for the website not having a question about a referendum; (e) what safeguards are in place to ensure that individuals do not submit multiple surveys that could skew the results; (f) what safeguards are in place to ensure that responses from non-Canadian entities do not skew the results; (g) what safeguards are in place to ensure that the survey is not skewed due to the use of “bots” or other similar devices; and (h) is there a limit on the number of responses that may come from a single IP address, and, if so, what is the limit and how is it enforced? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-645.
2017-01-30 [p.1240]
Q-646 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to projects funded under the proposed Canada Infrastructure Bank: (a) what specific measures are in place to ensure that small and rural municipalities, specifically those municipalities with a population under 50 000, receive infrastructure funding from the bank; (b) what specific measures are in place to ensure that small and rural municipalities, specifically those municipalities with a population between 50 000 and 100 000, receive infrastructure funding from the bank; and (c) how much infrastructure bank funding has been specifically allocated for communities with a population under 100 000? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-646.
2017-01-30 [p.1240]
Q-647 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to contracts and standing offers the government has had with advertising agencies, since November 4, 2015: (a) what contracts and standing offers does the government have with advertising agencies, broken down by department and agency; (b) what are the specific details of each contract or standing offer in (a), including (i) vendor, (ii) value, (iii) duration; and (c) for each contract or standing offer in (a), what are the details of each associated advertising campaign including (i) title, (ii) description, (iii) dates, (iv) duration? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-647.
2016-11-14 [p.1009]
Q-516 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to each of the following polls or focus groups referenced in the government's response to Q-339, what were the results, findings, and conclusions, broken down by poll or focus group conducted by (i) Environics for Finance Canada, (ii) EKOS Research Associates for Health Canada, (iii) Harris Decima for Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-516.
2016-06-16 [p.658]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning the criminal justice system (No. 421-00539);
2016-05-03 [p.389]
Q-78 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — With regard to federal spending within the electoral district of Perth—Wellington for each fiscal year from 2011-2012 to 2015-16, what is the list of grants, loans, contributions and contracts awarded by the government, broken down by (i) department and agency, (ii) municipality, (iii) name of the recipient, (iv) amount received, (v) program under which the spending was made, and (vi) date? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-421-78.
2016-02-25 [p.208]
— by Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington), one concerning the electoral system (No. 421-00084);
Results: 1 - 51 of 51

Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data