Journals
 
 
 
RSS feed based on search criteria Export search results - CSV (plain text) Export search results - XML
Add search criteria
2019-06-19 [p.5711]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Trudeau (Prime Minister), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-100, An Act to implement the Agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican States, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on International Trade;
And of the amendment of Ms. Hardcastle (Windsor—Tecumseh), seconded by Mr. Masse (Windsor West), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-100, An Act to implement the Agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican States, because it:
(a) fails to improve labour provisions that are necessary to protect good jobs;
(b) allows for an extension of drug patents that will significantly increase the cost of medicine for Canadians;
(c) leaves the environment vulnerable due to the absence of clear, enforceable protection provisions;
(d) is being rushed through the legislative process, without adequate time and attention for such a crucial trade agreement;
(e) will shift the levers of power within the economy away from governments and workers, in favour of corporations, by weakening public regulations on public health and the environment; and
(f) puts the poorest and most marginalized Canadians at further risk by failing to ensure the protection of human rights, gender equality and inclusive economic growth.”.
The debate continued.
2019-06-19 [p.5716]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Trudeau (Prime Minister), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-100, An Act to implement the Agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican States, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on International Trade;
And of the amendment of Ms. Hardcastle (Windsor—Tecumseh), seconded by Mr. Masse (Windsor West), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-100, An Act to implement the Agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican States, because it:
(a) fails to improve labour provisions that are necessary to protect good jobs;
(b) allows for an extension of drug patents that will significantly increase the cost of medicine for Canadians;
(c) leaves the environment vulnerable due to the absence of clear, enforceable protection provisions;
(d) is being rushed through the legislative process, without adequate time and attention for such a crucial trade agreement;
(e) will shift the levers of power within the economy away from governments and workers, in favour of corporations, by weakening public regulations on public health and the environment; and
(f) puts the poorest and most marginalized Canadians at further risk by failing to ensure the protection of human rights, gender equality and inclusive economic growth.”.
The debate continued.
2019-06-19 [p.5717]
The question was put on the amendment and, pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 28, 2019, the recorded division was deferred until Thursday, June 20, 2019, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2019-06-18 [p.5688]
Ms. Hardcastle (Windsor—Tecumseh), seconded by Mr. Masse (Windsor West), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-100, An Act to implement the Agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican States, because it:
(a) fails to improve labour provisions that are necessary to protect good jobs;
(b) allows for an extension of drug patents that will significantly increase the cost of medicine for Canadians;
(c) leaves the environment vulnerable due to the absence of clear, enforceable protection provisions;
(d) is being rushed through the legislative process, without adequate time and attention for such a crucial trade agreement;
(e) will shift the levers of power within the economy away from governments and workers, in favour of corporations, by weakening public regulations on public health and the environment; and
(f) puts the poorest and most marginalized Canadians at further risk by failing to ensure the protection of human rights, gender equality and inclusive economic growth.”.
Debate arose thereon.
2019-06-10 [p.5516]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Morneau (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Garneau (Minister of Transport), — That Bill C-101, An Act to amend the Customs Tariff and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance;
And of the amendment of Mr. O'Toole (Durham), seconded by Mr. Carrie (Oshawa), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-101, An Act to amend the Customs Tariff and the Canadian International Trade Act, because it fails to:
(a) take into consideration regional disparities in industry needs, specifically, that domestic producers only minimally supply certain steel products to British Columbia, Quebec, and Newfoundland and Labrador;
(b) add a geographic exclusion, either exempting British Columbia, Quebec, and Newfoundland and Labrador from the proposed safeguards or allocating a dedicated share of the regional quota to British Columbia, Quebec, and Newfoundland and Labrador;
(c) stipulate specific tariff and trade disruption relief to steel fabricators;
(d) mandate that the funds collected through retaliatory tariffs on the United States go to support small and medium-sized Canadian steel and aluminium fabricators and retailers impacted by the application of the retaliatory tariffs; and
(e) grant specific product exclusions for certain steel products that are not produced in commercial quantities in Canada to avoid the negative economic impact of safeguards on critical public infrastructure projects like the Champlain Bridge, the Muskrat Falls Hydroelectric Dam, the Site C Dam, and projects of national economic importance like LNG Canada.”.
The debate continued.
2019-06-10 [p.5517]
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 1347 -- Vote no 1347) - View vote details.
YEAS: 76, NAYS: 173
2019-06-06 [p.5455]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Morneau (Minister of Finance), seconded by Ms. Bibeau (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food), — That Bill C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures, be now read a third time and do pass;
And of the amendment of Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), seconded by Mr. Aubin (Trois-Rivières), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give third reading to C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures, because it:
(a) gives more to big business than to Canadians;
(b) does not establish a universal pharmacare plan;
(c) does not solve the current housing crisis;
(d) maintains subsidies to oil companies;
(e) makes major changes to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act that are unfair and fail to meet the standards of the process established by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada;
(f) is an omnibus bill that is contrary to this government’s promises; and
(g) limits Members’ ability to vote separately on the various divisions of the Bill.”.
The debate continued.
2019-06-06 [p.5456]
The question was put on the amendment and, pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 28, 2019, the recorded division was deferred until later today, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.
2019-06-06 [p.5456]
Mr. O'Toole (Durham), seconded by Mr. Carrie (Oshawa), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-101, An Act to amend the Customs Tariff and the Canadian International Trade Act, because it fails to:
(a) take into consideration regional disparities in industry needs, specifically, that domestic producers only minimally supply certain steel products to British Columbia, Quebec, and Newfoundland and Labrador;
(b) add a geographic exclusion, either exempting British Columbia, Quebec, and Newfoundland and Labrador from the proposed safeguards or allocating a dedicated share of the regional quota to British Columbia, Quebec, and Newfoundland and Labrador;
(c) stipulate specific tariff and trade disruption relief to steel fabricators;
(d) mandate that the funds collected through retaliatory tariffs on the United States go to support small and medium-sized Canadian steel and aluminium fabricators and retailers impacted by the application of the retaliatory tariffs; and
(e) grant specific product exclusions for certain steel products that are not produced in commercial quantities in Canada to avoid the negative economic impact of safeguards on critical public infrastructure projects like the Champlain Bridge, the Muskrat Falls Hydroelectric Dam, the Site C Dam, and projects of national economic importance like LNG Canada.”.
Debate arose thereon.
2019-06-06 [p.5457]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 28, 2019, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Morneau (Minister of Finance), seconded by Ms. Bibeau (Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food), — That Bill C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures, be now read a third time and do pass.
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), seconded by Mr. Aubin (Trois-Rivières), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give third reading to C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures, because it:
(a) gives more to big business than to Canadians;
(b) does not establish a universal pharmacare plan;
(c) does not solve the current housing crisis;
(d) maintains subsidies to oil companies;
(e) makes major changes to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act that are unfair and fail to meet the standards of the process established by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada;
(f) is an omnibus bill that is contrary to this government’s promises; and
(g) limits Members’ ability to vote separately on the various divisions of the Bill.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 1343 -- Vote no 1343) - View vote details.
YEAS: 30, NAYS: 226
2019-06-05 [p.5450]
Mr. Dubé (Beloeil—Chambly), seconded by Mr. Aubin (Trois-Rivières), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give third reading to C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures, because it:
(a) gives more to big business than to Canadians;
(b) does not establish a universal pharmacare plan;
(c) does not solve the current housing crisis;
(d) maintains subsidies to oil companies;
(e) makes major changes to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act that are unfair and fail to meet the standards of the process established by the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada;
(f) is an omnibus bill that is contrary to this government’s promises; and
(g) limits Members’ ability to vote separately on the various divisions of the Bill.”.
Debate arose thereon.
2019-04-30 [p.5193]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Morneau (Minister of Finance), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance;
And of the amendment of Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton), seconded by Mr. Kent (Thornhill), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures, since the Bill does not balance the budget this year, as promised by the Liberals during the election, but instead the deficit will hit $19.8 billion and the debt will soar to over $705 billion.”.
The debate continued.
2019-04-30 [p.5197]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Morneau (Minister of Finance), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance;
And of the amendment of Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton), seconded by Mr. Kent (Thornhill), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures, since the Bill does not balance the budget this year, as promised by the Liberals during the election, but instead the deficit will hit $19.8 billion and the debt will soar to over $705 billion.”.
The debate continued.
2019-04-30 [p.5197]
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 1300 -- Vote no 1300) - View vote details.
YEAS: 85, NAYS: 211
2019-04-12 [p.5165]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Morneau (Minister of Finance), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance;
And of the amendment of Ms. Gladu (Sarnia—Lambton), seconded by Mr. Kent (Thornhill), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following:
“the House decline to give second reading to Bill C-97, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 19, 2019 and other measures, since the Bill does not balance the budget this year, as promised by the Liberals during the election, but instead the deficit will hit $19.8 billion and the debt will soar to over $705 billion.”.
The debate continued.
Results: 1 - 15 of 133 | Page: 1 of 9

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
>
>|