Journals
 
 
 
RSS feed based on search criteria Export search results - CSV (plain text) Export search results - XML
Add search criteria
2019-06-20 [p.5728]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing or Special Order or usual practice of the House:
(a) the amendment to the motion respecting the Senate amendments to Bill C-83, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and another Act, be deemed negatived on division and the main motion be deemed carried on division; and
(b) the amendment to the motion for second reading of Bill C-100, An Act to implement the Agreement between Canada, the United States of America and the United Mexican States, be deemed negatived on division and that the Bill be deemed read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on International Trade.
2019-06-19 [p.5712]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1378 -- Vote no 1378) - View vote details.
YEAS: 149, NAYS: 67
2019-06-19 [p.5715]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1379 -- Vote no 1379) - View vote details.
YEAS: 161, NAYS: 58
2019-06-19 [p.5719]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing or Special Order or usual practice of the House:
(a) the motion respecting the Senate Amendments to Bill C-91, An Act respecting Indigenous Languages, be deemed adopted;
(b) the motion respecting the Senate Amendments to Bill C-92, An Act respecting First Nations, Inuit and Métis children, youth and families, be deemed adopted;
(c) Bill C-98, An Act to amend the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act and the Canada Border Services Agency Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be deemed to have been concurred in at the report stage, and deemed read a third time and passed;
(d) Bill C-101, An Act to amend the Customs Tariff and the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Act, be deemed to have been concurred in at the report stage, and deemed read a third time and passed on division; and
(e) when the House adjourns on Thursday, June 20, 2019, it shall stand adjourned until Monday, September 16, 2019, provided that, for the purposes of any Standing Order, it shall be deemed to have been adjourned pursuant to Standing Order 28 and be deemed to have sat on Friday, June 21, 2019.
2019-06-18 [p.5676]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 28, 2019, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Ms. Murray (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Sohi (Minister of Natural Resources), — That a Message be sent to the Senate to acquaint Their Honours that, in relation to Bill C-58, An Act to amend the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, the House:
agrees with amendments 1, 2, 4, 5(b), 6, 7, 8(b), 9, 10, 11, 13, 14(b), 15(a), (b) and (d), 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 made by the Senate;
respectfully disagrees with amendments 3 and 12 because the amendments seek to legislate matters which are beyond the policy intent of the bill, whose purpose is to make targeted amendments to the Act, notably to authorize the Information Commissioner to make orders for the release of records or with respect to other matters relating to requests, and to create a new Part of the Act providing for the proactive publication of information or materials related to the Senate, the House of Commons, parliamentary entities, ministers’ offices including the Prime Minister’s Office, government institutions, and institutions that support superior courts;
as a consequence of Senate amendment 4, proposes to add the following amendment:
1. New clause 6.2, page 4: Add the following after line 4:
“6.2 The portion of section 7 of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:
7 Where access to a record is requested under this Act, the head of the government institution to which the request is made shall, subject to sections 8 and 9, within 30 days after the request is received,”.
proposes that amendment 5(a) be amended to read as follows:
“(a) on page 5, delete lines 31 to 36;
(a.1) on page 6, replace line 1 with the following:
“13 Section 30 of the Act is amended by adding the”;”;
as a consequence of Senate amendment 5(a), proposes to add the following amendments:
1. Clause 16, page 7: Replace line 37 with the following:
“any of paragraphs 30(1)(a) to (e), the Commissioner”.
2. Clause 19, page 11: Replace line 28 with the following:
“any of paragraphs 30(1)(a) to (e) and who receives a re-”.
proposes that amendment 8(a) be amended by deleting subsection (6);
proposes that amendment 14(a) be amended by replacing the text of the English version of the amendment with the following: “the publication may constitute a breach of parliamen-”;
respectfully disagrees with amendment 15(c) because providing the Information Commissioner with oversight over proactive publication by institutions supporting Parliament and the courts has the potential to infringe parliamentary privilege and judicial independence.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1367 -- Vote no 1367) - View vote details.
YEAS: 164, NAYS: 134
2019-06-18 [p.5683]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1370 -- Vote no 1370) - View vote details.
YEAS: 167, NAYS: 123
(See list under Division No. 1369)
Accordingly, Bill C-102, An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2020, was read the second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole.
2019-06-18 [p.5683]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1371 -- Vote no 1371) - View vote details.
YEAS: 167, NAYS: 123
(See list under Division No. 1369)
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
2019-06-18 [p.5683]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1372 -- Vote no 1372) - View vote details.
YEAS: 167, NAYS: 123
(See list under Division No. 1369)
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2019-06-18 [p.5684]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1373 -- Vote no 1373) - View vote details.
YEAS: 157, NAYS: 113
2019-06-18 [p.5686]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1374 -- Vote no 1374) - View vote details.
YEAS: 190, NAYS: 86
2019-06-17 [p.5642]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1360 -- Vote no 1360) - View vote details.
YEAS: 152, NAYS: 94
2019-06-17 [p.5644]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 28, 2019, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. LeBlanc (Minister of Intergovernmental and Northern Affairs and Internal Trade), seconded by Ms. Chagger (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), — That Bill C-88, An Act to amend the Mackenzie Valley Resource Management Act and the Canada Petroleum Resources Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, be now read a third time and do pass.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1361 -- Vote no 1361) - View vote details.
YEAS: 198, NAYS: 78
Accordingly, the Bill was read the third time and passed.
2019-06-17 [p.5646]
Pursuant to Order made Tuesday, May 28, 2019, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Wilkinson (Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard), seconded by Mr. Sajjan (Minister of National Defence), — That a Message be sent to the Senate to acquaint Their Honours that, in relation to Bill C-68, An Act to amend the Fisheries Act and other Acts in consequence, the House:
agrees with amendments 1(b), 1(c), 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 13, 14 and 15 made by the Senate;
respectfully disagrees with amendment 1(a) because it is contrary to the objective of the Act that its habitat provisions apply to all fish habitats throughout Canada;
proposes that amendment 3 be amended by deleting “guaranteed,” and, in the English version, by replacing the word “in” with the word “by”;
proposes that amendment 9 be amended by deleting section 35.11;
respectfully disagrees with amendment 11 because the amendment seeks to legislate in respect of third-party, or market-based, fish habitat banking, which is beyond the policy intent of the Bill that is to provide only for proponent-led fish habitat banking;
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the amendment of Mr. Doherty (Cariboo—Prince George), seconded by Mr. Arnold (North Okanagan—Shuswap), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word “That” and substituting the following:
“the amendments made by the Senate to Bill C-68, An Act to amend the Fisheries Act and other Acts in consequence, be now read a second time and concurred in.”.
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 1362 -- Vote no 1362) - View vote details.
YEAS: 77, NAYS: 198
2019-06-17 [p.5648]
Pursuant to Order made Thursday, June 13, 2019, under the provisions of Standing Order 78(3), the question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1363 -- Vote no 1363) - View vote details.
YEAS: 193, NAYS: 81
2019-06-13 [p.5561]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 1355 -- Vote no 1355) - View vote details.
YEAS: 154, NAYS: 104
Results: 1 - 15 of 563 | Page: 1 of 38

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>
>|