Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 15 of 27
2015-07-22 [p.2877]
— by Ms. Raitt (Minister of Transport) — Report on Commercial Vehicle Safety in Canada for the year 2010 and Comprehensive Review of the Amendments to the Motor Vehicle Transport Act, pursuant to the Motor Vehicle Transport Act, R.S. 1985, c. 29 (3rd Supp.), sbs. 25(1) and s. 26. — Sessional Paper No. 8560-412-571-01. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities)
2015-07-22 [p.2878]
— by Ms. Raitt (Minister of Transport) — Reports of Transport Canada for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2015, pursuant to the Access to Information Act and to the Privacy Act, R.S. 1985, c. A-1 and P-21, sbs. 72(2). — Sessional Paper No. 8561-412-690-02. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights)
2015-06-12 [p.2750]
Q-1214 — Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — With regard to the Northumberland Ferry Service between Wood Islands, Prince Edward Island, and Caribou, Nova Scotia: (a) how much of the 2014 Budget's $58 million for three Atlantic ferry services has been budgeted for this service, broken down by fiscal year; (b) on what date is the current contract set to expire; (c) what are the details of each contract signed between the federal government and Northumberland Ferry Services Limited for the operation of this service since its establishment, including the (i) date the contract was signed, (i) length of the contract, (iii) funding allocated; (d) based on government findings, what economic impact does this ferry service have on (i) Prince Edward Island, (ii) Nova Scotia; (e) do government plans for this service include (i) provisions for it to be in place for the next five years, (ii) provisions to maintain or exceed current levels of service; (f) what are the details of all government correspondences and documents relating to this ferry service, broken down by (i) relevant file or internal tracking numbers, (ii) correspondence or file type, (iii) subject, (iv) date, (v) purpose, (vi) origin, (vii) intended destination, (viii) other officials, agencies, departments, or contractors copied or involved; and (g) what are the details of the government’s 2010 public service review of this ferry service? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1214.
2015-06-04 [p.2636]
Q-1167 — Mr. Byrne (Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte) — With regard to Transport Canada and Marine Atlantic Incorporated, for fiscal years 1998 to 2007, and for fiscal years 2007-2008 to 2014-2015, respectively, while taking into consideration any transition to new accounting periods: (a) what was the (i) annual parliamentary appropriation supplied to Marine Atlantic Incorporated, (ii) total annual revenue collected from users, (iii) annual gross revenue; (b) what was the percentage of cost recovery from users broken down by (i) company-wide operations, (ii) the Port aux Basques to North Sydney route operations, (iii) the Argentia to North Sydney route operations; (c) based on the information provided in (b), what capital and what operational inputs are generally included in items (i) to (iii) respectively; (d) what rates have been charged to users for each type of service offered by Marine Atlantic Incorporated during this period and what was the effective net rate for each such service, broken down by any (i) additional service fees, (ii) fuel surcharges, (iii) security fees, (iv) all other incremental fees or charges that may have been applied; (e) what was the first year that a fuel surcharge was applied to any rates; and (f) has there been a year in which the previous year’s fuel surcharge was rolled into or combined with the previously established rates, and subsequently, a new fuel surcharge established over and above the new rate? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1167.
2015-06-04 [p.2636]
Q-1168 — Mr. Byrne (Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte) — With regard to Transport Canada and Marine Atlantic Incorporated: (a) what were the costs incurred to refit each vessel to comply with Canadian safety standards or to refurbish or alter the vessels in any way before Marine Atlantic took possession of each vessel, for the (i) Motor Vessel (MV) Atlantic Vision, (ii) MV Blue Puttees, (iii) MV Highlanders; (b) what were the costs incurred to refit each vessel to comply with Canadian safety standards or to refurbish or alter the vessels in any way after Marine Atlantic took possession of each vessel in (a); (c) what were the annual lease costs paid out from 2008-2009 to the present, as well as the anticipated annual lease costs for each vessel in (a); (d) what, if any, is the pre-negotiated purchase price for each vessel if they were to be purchased from their owners by Transport Canada or Marine Atlantic at the end of their current leases, for each vessel in (a); (e) what are the anticipated costs to Transport Canada or to Marine Atlantic of not renewing the vessel leases beyond the current terms and returning the vessels to their owners for each vessel in (a); and (f) based on the information in (e), what are the details of these costs? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1168.
2015-06-04 [p.2637]
Q-1175 — Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor) — With regard to Marine Atlantic Incorporated: (a) what are all projects, initiatives, or expenditures stemming from the five-year investment fund announced in the 2010 federal budget, broken down by: (i) cost, (ii) date, (iii) timelines, (iv) rationales for each project or initiative; (b) what are the details of all government correspondences and documentations relating to the five-year investment, including (i) relevant file or tracking numbers, (ii) correspondence or file type, (iii) subject, (iv) date, (v) purpose, (vi) origin, (vii) intended destination, (viii) other officials, agencies, departments, or contractors copied or involved; (c) what are the details of all government correspondences and documentation concerning Marine Atlantic Incorporated as it relates to the Ferry Services Stewardship and Support Program and the Transportation Infrastructure Program through Transport Canada since the creation of these programs, including (i) relevant file or tracking numbers, (ii) correspondence or file type, (iii) subject, (iv) date, (v) purpose, (vi) origin, (vii) intended destination, (viii) other officials, agencies, departments, or contractors copied or involved; (d) has Marine Atlantic undertaken any advertising or marketing of the promotional discount campaign for the North Sydney-Argentia run and, if so, what has been done, broken down by (i) date, (ii) cost, (iii) medium, (iv) targeted audiences; (e) again with respect to the promotional discount campaign, (i) what is the rationale in detail concerning the status and future planning of the promotional discount campaign for ferry services, (ii) what is the rationale in detail why the promotional discount campaign was not applied to the Port aux Basques-North Sydney run, (iii) was any public opinion research conducted prior to launching the promotional discount campaign and, if so, what are the details of any such research; and (f) what are the details of all government correspondences and documentation concerning the promotional discount campaign, including (i) relevant file or tracking numbers, (ii) correspondence or file type, (iii) subject, (iv) date, (v) purpose, (vi) origin, (vii) intended destination, (viii) other officials, agencies, departments, or contractors copied or involved? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1175.
2015-04-22 [p.2396]
— by Ms. Raitt (Minister of Transport) — Interim Order No. 3 Respecting Flights Deck Occupants (81100-3-38-2), dated April 22, 2015, pursuant to the Aeronautics Act, R.S. 1985, c. A-2, sbs. 6.41(5) and (6). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-412-926-05. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities)
2015-04-20 [p.2369]
Q-1077 — Ms. Freeland (Toronto Centre) — With regard to safety measures for commercial railways since January 2006: (a) what was the total number of safety audits conducted by Transport Canada, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) operator, (iv) those carried out in the Greater Toronto Area, (v) those carried out within 5 km of the Summerhill-North Toronto CPR Station, (vi) associated cost, (vii) percentage passed, (viii) percentage failed; (b) what was the total number of operator-led audits performed, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) operator, (iv) those carried out in the Greater Toronto Area, (v) those carried out on the CP North Toronto Subdivision, (vi) associated cost, (vii) percentage passed, (viii) percentage failed; (c) what are the details of Transport Canada’s most recent safety audit for each area of track between stations, broken down by (i) date, (ii) province, (iii) operator, (iv) subdivision name, (v) internal tracking number of report, (vi) result, (vii) recommended follow-up action, (viii) associated cost; (d) what was the total number of safety audits performed by Transport Canada on equipment, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) operator, (iv) results, (v) recommended follow-up action, (vi) associated costs; (e) what was the total number of operator-led safety audits performed on equipment, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) operator, (iv) results, (v) recommended follow-up action; (f) what was the total number of safety audits recommended by Transport Canada, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) those intended to be carried out in the Greater Toronto Area; (g) what was the total number of safety auditors employed by Transport Canada, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) those employed in the Greater Toronto Area, (iv) full-time, part-time, or contract status; (h) what was the total number of job postings for safety auditors, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) those employed in the Greater Toronto Area, (iv) full-time, part-time, or contract status; (i) what was the total number of apprentices or trainees receiving training to conduct safety audits, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) those being trained in the Greater Toronto Area, (iv) full-time, part-time, or contract status; (j) what was the total government cost of training new safety auditors, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) full-time, part-time, or contract status; (k) what are the details of any internal training programs intended to provide the necessary training to conduct safety audits, including (i) name or subject, (ii) province, (iii) starting date, (iv) duration, (v) internal tracking numbers of documents related to such programs, (vi) outcomes;
(l) what are the details of any Transport Canada training programs intended to provide safety training to operators, including (i) name or subject, (ii) province, (iii) starting date, (iv) duration, (v) internal tracking numbers of documents related to such programs, (vi) associated cost; (m) what was the total number of accidents reported within the Greater Toronto Area, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) cause of accident (e.g., collision or derailment), (iii) total number of injuries, (iv) total number of fatalities, (v) monetary value of damage to goods, property or environment, (vi) type of material being transported, (vii) follow-up action recommended, (viii) follow-up action taken; (n) what was the total number of accidents reported within 5 km of the Summerhill-North Toronto CPR Station, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) cause of accident (e.g., collision or derailment), (iii) total number of injuries, (iv) total number of fatalities, (v) type of material being transported, (vi) follow-up action recommended, (vii) follow-up action taken; (o) for each calendar year in the period in question, what was the total government spending on oversight of follow-up action following rail accidents, broken down by (i) province, (ii) amounts spent within the Greater Toronto Area, (iii) amounts spent following incidents within 5 km of the Summerhill-North Toronto CPR Station; (p) what was the total number of safety concerns or complaints reported, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) concerns reported within the Greater Toronto Area, (iv) concerns reported within 5 km of the Summerhill-North Toronto CPR Station; (q) what was the total number of staff reprimands for safety violations, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) operator, (iv) safety violations within the Greater Toronto Area, (v) safety violations within 5 km of the Summerhill-North Toronto CPR Station; (r) what was the total number of staff terminated for safety violations, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) operator, (iv) safety violations within the Greater Toronto Area, (v) safety violations within 5 km of the Summerhill-North Toronto CPR Station; (s) what was the total of government spending on advertising related to the promotion of rail safety measures and precautions, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) type of media (e.g., print, radio, television), (iv) starting date, (v) duration; and (t) what was the total of government spending on advertising promoting the safety of Canadian railways, broken down by (i) calendar year, (ii) province, (iii) type of media (e.g., print, radio, television), (iv) starting date, (v) duration? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1077.
2015-04-20 [p.2377]
— by Ms. Raitt (Minister of Transport) — Interim Order No. 2 Respecting Flights Deck Occupants (81100-3-38-1), dated April 10, 2015, pursuant to the Aeronautics Act, R.S. 1985, c. A-2, sbs. 6.41(5) and (6). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-412-926-04. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities)
2015-03-31 [p.2318]
Q-1034 — Mr. Byrne (Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte) — With regard to the operation of the federal Crown Corporation Marine Atlantic Incorporated (MAI) and the policy and operational oversight provided for MAI by Transport Canada: (a) what is Transport Canada’s rationale for its decision to acquire or charter new vessels of approximately 200 metres in length to renew the MAI fleet, in light of the fact that the MAI Board of Directors had previously approved their consultant’s recommendation that vessels of 175 metres in length would be best suited to the service; (b) what were the perceived advantages of the longer vessels that outweighed the increased likelihood that their operations would be inhibited by poor weather; (c) what was Transport Canada’s rationale for establishing a four-vessel fleet for MAI, given the 2005 Report from the Minister of Transport’s Advisory Committee on Marine Atlantic Inc. that had recommended a three-vessel fleet; (d) does MAI track delays that customers experience in order to make new bookings during peak times, (i) if so, what are the details of such delays for June to September 2013, and June to September 2014, (ii) if not, why not; (e) does MAI collect data on the delay between a customer’s preferred travel date and the date for which they are actually able to make a reservation for travel, (i) if so, what are the details of such delays for June to September 2013, and June to September 2014, (ii) if not, why not; (f) during times of traffic backlog (e.g., because of excess demand, mechanical failure or poor weather) is it MAI’s policy not to take new reservations, or allow vehicles to buy passage and enter the parking lots, until the backlog is cleared and, if so, why; (g) in what ways do the new collective agreements signed between 2011 and 2013 for MAI employees allow additional operational flexibility and potential for labour cost savings to MAI, compared to the previous collective agreements; (h) what measureable benefits has MAI received as a result of the new collective agreements; (i) is the loan for the MV Leif Ericson still being paid out of the operating budget and, if so, why; (j) other than the Canadian Forces Appreciation Fare, has MAI ever introduced any other fare options to give users more choice and increase fare revenue and, if not, why not; (k) is it MAI’s current policy to give tractor-trailers loading priority over drop trailers and, if not, why not; (l) did MAI apply to Transport Canada Marine Safety in order to be able to allow more drivers of tractor-trailers onboard restricted sailings and, if not, why not; (m) has an independent ombudsman ever been appointed to receive customer complaints regarding MAI’s service and, if not, why not; (n) how has the effectiveness of MAI’s maintenance management systems and practices improved since 2009; (o) does MAI track the average time between equipment failures, (i) if so, what trends have been observed in equipment performance measures since 2009, (ii) if not, why not; (p) what objective indicators has MAI established with respect to vessel turnaround time; and (q) what trends have been observed in the indicators mentioned in (p)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1034.
2015-03-31 [p.2324]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Clement (President of the Treasury Board) laid upon the Table, — Reports on Plans and Priorities, Main Estimates, 2015-16 (USB key included), as follows:
(1) Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada and Canadian Polar Commission. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-99;
(2) Administrative Tribunals Support Service of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-100;
(3) Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-101;
(4) Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-102;
(5) Canada Border Services Agency. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-103;
(6) Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-104;
(7) Canada Revenue Agency. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-105;
(8) Canada School of Public Service. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-106;
(9) Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-107;
(10) Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-108;
(11) Canadian Food Inspection Agency. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-109;
(12) Canadian Grain Commission. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-110;
(13) Canadian Heritage. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-111;
(14) Canadian Human Rights Commission. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-112;
(15) Canadian Institutes of Health Research. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-113;
(16) Canadian Intergovernmental Conference Secretariat. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-114;
(17) Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-115;
(18) Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-116;
(19) Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-117;
(20) Canadian Space Agency. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-118;
(21) Canadian Transportation Agency. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-119;
(22) Citizenship and Immigration Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-120;
(23) Civilian Review and Complaints Commission for the RCMP. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-121;
(24) Copyright Board of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-122;
(25) Correctional Service of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-123;
(26) Courts Administration Service. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-124;
(27) Department of Finance Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-125;
(28) Department of Justice Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-126;
(29) Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-127;
(30) Employment and Social Development Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-128;
(31) Environment Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-129;
(32) Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-130;
(33) Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-131;
(34) Fisheries and Oceans Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-132;
(35) Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-133;
(36) Health Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-134;
(37) Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-135;
(38) Industry Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-136;
(39) Infrastructure Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-137;
(40) Library and Archives Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-138;
(41) Military Grievances External Review Committee. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-139;
(42) Military Police Complaints Commission of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-140;
(43) National Energy Board. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-141;
(44) National Film Board of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-142;
(45) National Research Council Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-143;
(46) Natural Resources Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-144;
(47) Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-145;
(48) Northern Pipeline Agency. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-146;
(49) Office of the Auditor General of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-147;
(50) Office of the Chief Electoral Officer. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-148;
(51) Office of the Commissioner for Federal Judicial Affairs Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-149;
(52) Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-150;
(53) Office of the Commissioner of Official Languages. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-151;
(54) Office of the Communications Security Establishment Commissioner. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-152;
(55) Office of the Correctional Investigator. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-153;
(56) Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-154;
(57) Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-155;
(58) Office of the Public Sector Integrity Commissioner of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-156;
(59) Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-157;
(60) Parks Canada Agency. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-158;
(61) Parole Board of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-159;
(62) Patented Medicine Prices Review Board. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-160;
(63) Privy Council Office. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-161;
(64) Public Health Agency of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-162;
(65) Public Prosecution Service of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-163;
(66) Public Safety Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-164;
(67) Public Service Commission of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-165;
(68) Public Works and Government Services Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-166;
(69) RCMP External Review Committee. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-167;
(70) Royal Canadian Mounted Police. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-168;
(71) Security Intelligence Review Committee. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-169;
(72) Shared Services Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-170;
(73) Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-171;
(74) Statistics Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-172;
(75) Status of Women Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-173;
(76) Supreme Court of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-174;
(77) The National Battlefields Commission. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-175;
(78) Transport Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-176;
(79) Transportation Safety Board of Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-177;
(80) Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-178;
(81) Veterans Affairs Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-411-179;
(82) Veterans Review and Appeal Board. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-180;
(83) Western Economic Diversification Canada. - Sessional Paper No. 8520-412-181.
8520-412-100 Main Estimates, 2015-2016 ...8520-412-101 Main Estimates, 2015-2016 ...8520-412-102 Main Estimates, 2015-2016 ...8520-412-103 Main Estimates, 2015-2016 ...8520-412-104 Main Estimates, 2015-2016 ...8520-412-105 Main Estimates, 2015-2016 ...8520-412-106 Main Estimates, 2015-2016 ...8520-412-107 Main Estimates, 2015-2016 ...8520-412-108 Main Estimates, 2015-2016 ...8520-412-109 Main Estimates, 2015-2016 ...8520-412-110 Main Estimates, 2015-2016 ... ...Show all topics
2015-03-30 [p.2302]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Ms. Raitt (Minister of Transport) laid upon the Table, — Interim Order Respecting Flight Deck Occupants (81100-3-38), dated March 27, 2015 , pursuant to the Aeronautics Act, R.S. 1985, c. A-2, sbs. 6.41(5) and (6). — Sessional Paper No. 8560-412-926-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities)
2015-03-12 [p.2230]
Mr. Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound), from the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented the Fifth Report of the Committee (Supplementary Estimates (C), 2014-15 — Votes 1c and 10c under TRANSPORT, and Vote 3c under WINDSOR-DETROIT BRIDGE AUTHORITY). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-412-190.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 47) was tabled.
2015-03-12 [p.2230]
Mr. Miller (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound), from the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities, presented the Sixth Report of the Committee (Main Estimates 2015-16 — Vote 1 under CANADA POST CORPORATION, Vote 1 under CANADIAN AIR TRANSPORT SECURITY AUTHORITY, Vote 1 under CANADIAN TRANSPORTATION AGENCY, Vote 1 under MARINE ATLANTIC INC., Votes 1, 5 and 10 under OFFICE OF INFRASTRUCTURE OF CANADA, Vote 1 under THE FEDERAL BRIDGE CORPORATION LIMITED, Vote 1 under THE JACQUES-CARTIER AND CHAMPLAIN BRIDGES INC., Votes 1, 5 and 10 under TRANSPORT, Vote 1 under VIA RAIL CANADA INC., and Vote 1 under WINDSOR-DETROIT BRIDGE AUTHORITY). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-412-191.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 47) was tabled.
2015-01-26 [p.1976]
Q-779 — Ms. Quach (Beauharnois—Salaberry) — With regard to the ship Kathryn Spirit moored in Beauharnois, Quebec: (a) has Environment Canada or Transport Canada received a towing plan or an environmental certificate application from the ship’s owner and, if so, when was this plan received; (b) according to government information, is Reciclajes Ecologicos Maritimos the ship’s owner; (c) if the answer to (b) is no, who owns the ship, according to government information; (d) has the government conducted an analysis as to whether federal legislation allows the ship to be dismantled at its mooring location and, if so, what are the details of this analysis; (e) has the government conducted an analysis of the risk of pollution from dismantling the ship and, if so, what are the details of this analysis; (f) according to government information, does the ship contain toxic materials and, if so, what are they; (g) is there a port equipped to dismantle such a ship in Canada and, if so, where is it;
(h) has the government analyzed whether federal legislation allows it to (i) seize the ship, (ii) tow the ship to a safe location and, if so, what are the details of this analysis; (i) does the government intend to (i) seize the ship, (ii) tow the ship to a safe location; and (j) has the government conducted an analysis on dismantling the ship in the Port of Salaberry-de-Valleyfield or in another port elsewhere in the country and, if so, has it estimated the cost of such an operation? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-779.
Results: 1 - 15 of 27 | Page: 1 of 2

1
2
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data