Skip to main content
Parliament of Canada
Visit Parliament
Visit
Français
FR
Menu
Parliamentary Business
Parliamentary Business - Home
The House
Sitting Calendar
House Publications
Bills (LEGIS
info
)
Petitions
Votes
Search the Debates (Hansard)
Status of House Business
Committees
List of Committees and Overview
Meetings
Bills in Committee (LEGIS
info
)
Studies, Activities and Reports
Search the Transcripts
Participate
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Legislative Summaries
Research Publications
Parliamentary Historical Resources
(1867-1993)
Parliamentary Diplomacy
Parliamentary Diplomacy - Home
Speakers' Activities
Parliamentary Associations
Visits and Events
Conferences
Parliamentary Officers' Study Program
Members
Members - Home
Members and Roles
Members of Parliament
The Speaker
Ministry (Cabinet)
Parliamentary Secretaries
Party Leaders and other House Officers
Related Information
Party Standings
Seating Plan
Members' Expenditures
Registry of Designated Travellers
A Member's Typical Week
Resources
Contact Members of Parliament
Constituencies
Library of Parliament
Historical Information (PARLINFO)
Participate
Participate - Home
The House
Attend Live Debates
Watch and Listen to Chamber Proceedings
Create or Sign a Petition
A Typical Week at the House
Contact a Member of Parliament
Follow a Bill (LEGIS
info
)
Committees
Attend Meetings
Watch and Listen to Committee Proceedings
Current Consultations
How to Submit a Brief and Appear
Layout of a Typical Committee Room
Contact a Committee
Resources
Procedural Information
Library of Parliament
Classroom Activities
Teacher Resources
Teachers Institute
About the House
About the House - Home
Transparency and accountability
Board of Internal Economy
By-Laws and Policies
Members' Allowances and Services
House Administration
Reports and Disclosure
Conflict of Interest Code for Members
Accessibility
Arts and Heritage
History, Art and Architecture
Future of the Parliamentary Precinct
Memorial Chamber
Carillon
In pictures
Virtual Tour of the House
Live Hill Cam
Photo Gallery
Employment
Employment - Home
Career opportunities
Current Opportunities
Eligibility and Selection
General Application
Youth Opportunities
Canada's Top Employers for Young People
Student Employment
Page Program
Parliamentary Internship Programme
Working at the House
Who we are and what we Offer
Canada's Capital Region
City of Ottawa
City of Gatineau
Search
Search
Search
Search Source
Full website
Member
Bill
Topic
Petition
Share this page
Email
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Start of content
Publication Search
Publication Search
Save
Open
Switch to English site
Naviguer vers le site français
Search French content
Search English content
Add search criteria
View :
Detail
|
List
Results per page:
15
|
30
|
60
|
100
Save
Save
Save
Open
Refiners
Filter :
Filter
Show more
Date Range
from
to
Yesterday
Last 7 days
Last 30 days
Last 3 months
Last 6 months
Last 12 months
Click here to refine from
2012-06-25
to
2013-05-06
Hansard
Journals
Committee
BOIE
Favourites (
0
)
Hansard
Journals
Committee
BOIE
Favourites (
0
)
Searching in the French content
Tap here to search in the English content
Consult the
new user guides
For assistance, please
contact us
Consult the
new user guides
For assistance, please
contact us
Search English content
Search French content
Name, Text, Topics, Constituency...
Options
AND
OR
NOT
Name, Text, Topics, Constituency...
Options
AND
OR
NOT
Name, Text, Topics, Constituency...
Options
AND
OR
NOT
Name, Text, Topics, Constituency...
Options
AND
OR
NOT
Name, Text, Topics, Constituency...
Add search criteria
Search
Clear
Filter
Hansard
Journals
Committee
BOIE
(
0
)
Detail
List
Search Options:
Open
Save
Clear all
Results:
1 - 5 of 5
Add a filter on Journals - 232
Journals - 232
2015-06-16
2015-06-16
[p.2789]
...More
Q-1312 — Ms. Doré Lefebvre (Alfred-Pellan) — With regard to the Canada Post service reductions announced in December 2013: (a) what are the planned locations for community mailboxes in Laval; (b) how many employees were assigned to Laval before the elimination of home delivery was announced; (c) how many Canada Post employees will be required following the mailbox transition; (d) what was the volume of mail sent in the last ten years (i) from Laval to another destination, (ii) to Laval; (e) how many complaints have been received concerning (i) the transition from home delivery to community mailboxes, (ii) the location of community mailboxes in Laval; (f) how many complaints resulted in (i) an opened file, (ii) a change of location of these community mailboxes; (g) what steps are being taken to look after the needs of (i) persons with mobility impairments, (ii) seniors; (h) will current post offices still be active following the transition to community mailboxes; (i) what recourse will be available to residents affected by the location of mailboxes they consider to be dangerous or harmful; (j) what recourse was or continues to be available to residents affected by the installation of a community mailbox over the last 30 years, excluding the current transition; and (k) how many customer service employees at Canada Post, broken down by language of service, are assigned to complaints concerning the installation of community mailboxes from (i) across Canada, (ii) Quebec, (iii) Laval, (iv) the residents of Alfred-Pellan? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1312.
...Less
8555-412-1312 Canada Post service reductions
Access for disabled people
Budget cuts
Canada Post Corporation
Community mail boxes
Consumer complaints
Door-to-door postal delivery
Doré Lefebvre, Rosane
Government services
Laval
New Democratic Party Caucus
Orders for return to written questions
Persons with disabilities
Public complaints
Q-1312
Senior citizens
Staffing
...Show all topics
...Show less topics
Add a filter on Journals - 207
Journals - 207
2015-05-05
2015-05-05
[p.2473]
...More
Q-1118 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With respect to proposals for the mid-sized-projects component of the Enabling Accessibility Fund submitted to Human Resources and Skills Development Canada for the period from October 2010 to January 13, 2011: (a) what is the name and the sponsoring organization for each of the 167 proposals that met the initial screening criteria; (b) what were the internal assessment scores of the Department for each proposal; (c) what was the Department's passing grade for the internal assessment of each proposal; and (d) what were the top 25 proposals selected for the external evaluation team? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1118.
...Less
8555-412-1118 Enabling Accessibility Fund
Access for disabled people
Angus, Charlie
Department of Human Resources and Social ...
Enabling Accessibility Fund
Invitation to tender
New Democratic Party Caucus
Orders for return to written questions
Q-1118
Add a filter on Journals - 172
Journals - 172
2012-10-30
2012-10-30
[p.2223]
...More
Q-861 — Mr. Ravignat (Pontiac) — With regard to the Enabling Accessibility Fund - Mid-Sized Project Component: (a) what was the score given to each of the projects at (i) the initial screening stage, (ii) the external construction expert stage, (iii) the internal review committee stage; (b) what projects were recommended to the Minister by (i) the external construction experts, (ii) the internal review committee; and (c) what was missing from the project proposal for the Centre Jean-Bosco in Maniwaki according to (i) the external construction experts, (ii) the internal review committee? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-861.
...Less
8555-411-861 Enabling Accessibility Fund
Access for disabled people
Centre Jean Bosco
Enabling Accessibility Fund
Government assistance
Maniwaki
New Democratic Party Caucus
Orders for return to written questions
Q-861
Ravignat, Mathieu
Review panels
Add a filter on Journals - 146
Journals - 146
2012-09-17
2012-09-17
[p.1923]
...More
Q-681 — Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River) — With regard to the “Enabling Access Fund” administered by the Department of Human Resources and Skills Development, for each fiscal year of the program's existence, what are: (a) the program criteria and any evaluation method used to determine which programs will receive funding, including any changes to the criteria from year to year; and (b) details about each applicant, including (i) applicant's name, (ii) riding where the project is located, (iii) amount of funding awarded, (iv) criteria, both quantitative and non-quantitative, on the basis of which the applicant was evaluated? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-681.
...Less
8555-411-681 Enabling Access Fund
Access for disabled people
Application process
Enabling Accessibility Fund
Government assistance
New Democratic Party Caucus
Orders for return to written questions
Q-681
Rafferty, John
Add a filter on Journals - 69
Journals - 69
2012-01-30
2012-01-30
[p.685]
...More
Q-225 — Ms. Perreault (Montcalm) — With respect to the Enabling Accessibility Fund: (a) how many applications were successful and received funding under this program, and how many applications were rejected through calls for proposals, since the start of the program; (b) with respect to successful applications, what was the location and value of each project, broken down by province and federal electoral district, through calls for proposals since the start of the program; (c) what is the total cost of administering the program thus far for each year since the start of the program; (d) how much funding is left; (e) how many major projects under this program will go to or went to expanding existing centres; (f) what is the value of the successful major projects applications that went to (i) the construction of new centres, (ii) the expanding of existing centres; (g) how many of the successful Mid-Sized Projects Enabling Accessibility Fund applications went to (i) renovating buildings, (ii) modifying vehicles, (iii) making information and communications more accessible; (h) what is the value of the successful Small Projects Enabling Accessibility Fund applications that went to (i) renovating buildings, (ii) modifying vehicles, (iii) making information and communications more accessible; (i) what is the reason most often given for rejecting an application; (j) what are the reasons given for rejecting an application and what is the frequency of each reason; (k) will the program be renewed next year; and (l) when will the next call for proposals be issued? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-225.
...Less
8555-411-225 Enabling Accessibility Fund
Access for disabled people
Enabling Accessibility Fund
Government expenditures
New Democratic Party Caucus
Orders for return to written questions
Perreault, Manon
Q-225
Results:
1 - 5 of 5
Show both languages
Refine Your Search
Parliament and Session
Date Range
All Journals
44th Parliament
44th Parliament
1st 2021.11.22 -
43rd Parliament
43rd Parliament
2nd 2020.09.23 - 2021.08.15
43rd Parliament
1st 2019.12.05 - 2020.08.18
42nd Parliament
42nd Parliament
1st 2015.12.03 - 2019.09.11
41st Parliament
41st Parliament
2nd 2013.10.16 - 2015.08.02
41st Parliament
1st 2011.06.02 - 2013.09.13
More...
Order of Business
Daily Routine Of Business
5
Topic
Access for disabled people
5
New Democratic Party Caucus
5
Enabling Accessibility Fund
4
Government assistance
2
Application process
1
Budget cuts
1
Community mail boxes
1
More...
Procedural Term
Orders for return to written questions
5
Export As:
XML
CSV
RSS
For more data options, please see
Open Data
Submit
×
contact us
Need help searching House of Commons publications?
Contact us at
indref@parl.gc.ca
or 613-992-8976
×
Loading...
Version: 1.0.0.0