Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 60 of 608
2015-06-19 [p.2853]
Q-1328 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to contracts under $10 000 granted by Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada since February 2, 2015: what are the (a) vendors' names; (b) contracts' reference numbers; (c) dates of the contracts; (d) descriptions of the services provided; (e) delivery dates; (f) original contracts' values; and (g) final contracts' values, if different from the original contracts' values? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1328.
2015-06-19 [p.2853]
Q-1329 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to materials prepared for past or current deputy heads of departments, crown corporations and agencies or their staff from April 1, 2007, to March 31, 2009: for every briefing document or docket prepared, what is (i) the date, (ii) the title or subject matter, (iii) the department’s internal tracking number? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1329.
2015-05-28 [p.2584]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning health care services (No. 412-5791);
2015-05-06 [p.2482]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning health care services (No. 412-5546);
2015-04-28 [p.2424]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning health care services (No. 412-5454);
2015-04-20 [p.2365]
Q-1061 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to exceptions granted under the Policy on Tabling of Treaties in Parliament (the Policy): (a) broken down by year, since the Policy became effective, how many and which specific instruments were granted exemptions; (b) on what basis was each exemption granted in (a); (c) if the exemption in (b) was based on urgency, (i) how was the treaty determined to be urgent, (ii) who made this determination, (iii) when; (d) if the exemption in (b) was for a reason other than urgency, (i) what was the reason, (ii) how was this determined; (e) who determines what constitutes an acceptable reason, other than urgency, to exempt a treaty from the normal tabling requirements under the Policy; (f) have any requested exceptions to the Policy not been granted; (g) broken down by treaties exempted, (i) on what date did Canada sign the instrument, (ii) when did Canada ratify the agreement, (iii) when was the treaty tabled in Parliament; (h) broken down by treaty exempted, was a joint letter drafted "that clearly articulates the rationale to proceed with the ratification, without tabling in the House of Commons"; (i) for each letter described in (h), (i) what is the date of the letter, (ii) to whom is it addressed, (iii) who signed it; (j) broken down by year, what treaties have been exempted from the Policy without a joint letter; (k) broken down by treaty in (j), why was no draft letter created; (l) with respect to the response of the government to part (gg) of Q-816, stating that no joint letter was created with respect to the exemption granted to the Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Canada to Improve International Tax Compliance through Enhanced Exchange of Information under the Convention Between the United States of America and Canada with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital, is the lack of such a letter typical;
(m) in each case where an exception to the Policy was granted, was the approval of the Prime Minister sought; (n) in each case where approval for an exception to the Policy was sought from the Prime Minister, was the approval granted; (o) if there were any cases where an exception was granted without approval being sought from the Prime Minister or being granted by the Prime Minister, (i) what treaty was at issue, (ii) what happened, (iii) what justified the course of action; (p) has any study or analysis been undertaken with respect to exceptions granted under the Policy; (q) when was the last time the Policy was reviewed and what were the conclusions of this review with respect to exemptions; (r) what is the policy justification for allowing an exception to the tabling policy; (s) is the granting of an exception always indicated in the explanatory memorandum; (t) if the answer to (s) is no, in what cases was a treaty granted an exception to the Policy but this information not included in the explanatory memorandum; (u) when an exception is granted and this is indicated in the explanatory memorandum, is the reason for the exception indicated in all cases; (v) in what cases has an exception been granted but the treaty still tabled for twenty-one sitting days prior to any Parliamentary action to bring it into force, where applicable; (w) may an exception be granted to the Policy without the Prime Minister's approval being sought; (x) may an exception to the Policy be granted without the Prime Minister's approval; (y) what statistics are kept and by whom regarding exceptions to the Policy; (z) by what means, and when in the process, is the public informed that an exception to the Policy has been granted; and (aa) by what means, and when in the process, is Parliament informed that an exception to the Policy has been granted? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1061.
2015-03-20 [p.2259]
Q-1006 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to contracts under $10 000 granted by Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada since April 1, 2014: what are the (a) vendors' names; (b) contracts' reference numbers; (c) dates of the contracts; (d) descriptions of the services provided; (e) delivery dates; (f) original contracts' values; and (g) final contracts' values, if different from the original contracts' values? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-1006.
2015-02-26 [p.2188]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning the grain industry (No. 412-5067).
2015-01-26 [p.2020]
Q-916 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to foreign affairs: (a) what are the dates, locations, and attendees of all meetings held from March 1, 2010, to December 4, 2014, attended by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, his staff, or officials from his Department, concerning the Global Market Action Plan; and (b) for all briefing materials or documents prepared for the Minister, his staff, or officials relative to such meetings, whether prepared before or after the meeting, what is (i) the date of the document, (ii) the title or subject matter of the document, (iii) the Department’s internal tracking number? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-916.
2015-01-26 [p.2021]
Q-920 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to foreign affairs: for each foreign visit or delegation described under the heading “Travel Expenses for Canadian Representation at International Conferences and Meetings” in the Public Accounts for fiscal years 2006-2007 to 2013-2014 inclusive, for each traveller or delegate who falls under the rubric of “Others” or “Stakeholders”, but not including parliamentarians or spouses of parliamentarians, what is his or her full name and the reason for which he or she was selected to join the visit or delegation? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-920.
2015-01-26 [p.2021]
Q-921 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With respect to the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Departmental Performance Review of actual spending for 2013-2014 on international development and humanitarian assistance to low-income countries: (a) what low-income countries received financial assistance; (b) how much was spent on each of those countries; (c) what countries that were previously in the low-income country category were moved to the categories “fragile states” and “crisis-affected countries”; (d) how much was spent on those newly identified fragile states and crisis-affected countries; and (e) will the $125.9 million in lapsed funding be allocated as end-of-year funding to other programs and, if so, (i) which other programs, (ii) in which specific locations, (iii) how much is allocated for each program? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-921.
2014-11-07 [p.1749]
Q-690 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to government funding, for each fiscal year since 2007-2008 inclusive: (a) what are the details of all grants, contributions, and loans to any organization, body, or group in the electoral district of Westmount—Ville-Marie, providing for each (i) the name of the recipient, (ii) the location of the recipient, indicating the municipality, (iii) the date, (iv) the amount, (v) the department or agency providing it, (vi) the program under which the grant, contribution, or loan was made, (vii) the nature or purpose; and (b) for each grant, contribution and loan identified in (a), was a press release issued to announce it and, if so, what is the (i) date, (ii) headline, (iii) file number of the press release? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-690.
2014-09-16 [p.1441]
Pursuant to Standing Order 52(10), the House proceeded to the consideration of a motion to adjourn the House for the purpose of discussing an important matter requiring urgent consideration, namely, the situation in Iraq.
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Foote (Random—Burin—St. George's), moved, — That this House do now adjourn.
Debate arose thereon.
At midnight, the Speaker declared the motion adopted.
2014-09-15 [p.1410]
Q-640 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to the RCMP: for each recommendation made by Assistant Chief Judge Daniel R. Pahl in his report dated March 3, 2011, made under the Alberta Fatality Inquiries Act, concerning the shooting deaths of four members of the RCMP on March 3, 2005, (a) what measures, if any, has the RCMP or government taken in response to each recommendation; (b) when were those measures taken; and (c) if no measures have been taken in response to a particular recommendation, why not? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-640.
2014-09-15 [p.1411]
Pursuant to Standing Order 52, Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) asked leave to move the adjournment of the House for the purpose of discussing a specific and important matter requiring urgent consideration, namely, the situation in Iraq.
The Speaker decided that the matter was proper to be discussed and, pursuant to Standing Order 52(9), directed that it be considered on Tuesday, September 16, 2014, at the ordinary hour of daily adjournment.
2014-06-18 [p.1317]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning the mining industry (No. 412-3854);
2014-05-30 [p.1109]
Q-420 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to the government’s Road to 2017 commemoration project and military commemoration program: (a) how much has been spent on these programs and projects since 2013, broken down by (i) department, (ii) amount, (iii) specific pillar or event, (iv) year; (b) how much does the government estimate will be spent on these programs and projects in total between 2013 and 2021, broken down by (i) department, (ii) amount, (iii) specific pillar or event, (iv) year; and (c) with regard to (a) and (b), what program activity and sub-program activity will this funding be allocated from, broken down by (i) department, (ii) amount, (iii) specific pillar or event, (iv) year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-420-01.
2014-05-26 [p.1050]
Q-440 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to contracts under $10,000 granted by Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada since January 1, 2013: what are the (a) vendors' names; (b) contracts' reference numbers; (c) dates of the contracts; (d) descriptions of the services provided; (e) delivery dates; (f) original contracts' values; and (g) final contracts' values if different from the original contracts' values? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-440.
2014-05-14 [p.1009]
Q-420 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to the government’s Road to 2017 commemoration project and military commemoration program: (a) how much has been spent on these programs and projects since 2013, broken down by (i) department, (ii) amount, (iii) specific pillar or event, (iv) year; (b) how much does the government estimate will be spent on these programs and projects in total between 2013 and 2021, broken down by (i) department, (ii) amount, (iii) specific pillar or event, (iv) year; and (c) with regard to (a) and (b), what program activity and sub-program activity will this funding be allocated from, broken down by (i) department, (ii) amount, (iii) specific pillar or event, (iv) year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-420.
2014-05-14 [p.1010]
Q-421 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to the ceremony and subsequent announcement on March 18, 2014 regarding the welcoming home of members of the Canadian Forces returning from the mission in Afghanistan: (a) what were the costs to the government for holding this ceremony, broken down by (i) department, (ii) program activity, (iii) sub-program activity; and (b) if not captured in (a), what was the cost associated with the CF-18s that participated in this event? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-421.
2014-04-29 [p.849]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning the situation in Venezuela (No. 412-2447);
2014-03-24 [p.691]
Q-276 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With regard to government funding, providing the dollar amount and the specific purpose, broken down by year from 2000 to the present: (a) how much government funding has been directed to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency; and (b) how much government funding has been directed to the Palestinian Authority? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-412-276.
2014-03-07 [p.654]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning transportation (No. 412-2006) and one concerning the situation in Syria (No. 412-2007);
2013-12-10 [p.375]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), Bill C-564, An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act (time limit), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2013-11-28 [p.221]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning budget measures (No. 412-0531);
2013-11-21 [p.190]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning budget measures (No. 412-0459).
2013-11-20 [p.182]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning VIA Rail (No. 412-0448);
2013-05-10 [p.3129]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Bennett (St. Paul's), Bill C-510, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (mischief), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.
2013-05-09 [p.3120]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning the Canada Post Corporation (No. 411-3792);
2013-05-06 [p.3085]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning the Canada Post Corporation (No. 411-3760);
2013-04-25 [p.3034]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning the Canada Post Corporation (No. 411-3668).
2013-04-24 [p.3024]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning the Canada Post Corporation (No. 411-3636);
2012-12-06 [p.2555]
— by Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), one concerning funding aid (No. 411-2668);
2012-12-05 [p.2547]
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Foote (Random—Burin—St. George's), — That Bill C-420, An Act to establish the Office of the Commissioner for Children and Young Persons in Canada, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 576 -- Vote no 576) - View vote details.
YEAS: 130, NAYS: 154
2012-12-03 [p.2403]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Foote (Random—Burin—St. George's), — That Bill C-420, An Act to establish the Office of the Commissioner for Children and Young Persons in Canada, be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities.
The debate continued.
2012-10-16 [p.2138]
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), moved, — That the House agree with the comments of the Right Honourable Member for Calgary Southwest on March 25, 1994, when he criticized omnibus legislation, suggesting that the subject matter of such bills is so diverse that a single vote on the content would put Members in conflict with their own principles and dividing the bill into several components would allow Members to represent views of their constituents on each of the different components in the bill; and that the House instruct the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs to study what reasonable limits should be placed on the consideration of omnibus legislation and that the Committee report back its findings, including specific recommendations for legislative measures or changes to the Standing Orders, no later than December 10, 2012.
Debate arose thereon.
2012-10-16 [p.2139]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North), in relation to the Business of Supply.
The debate continued.
2012-10-02 [p.2099]
The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities of Bill C-420, An Act to establish the Office of the Commissioner for Children and Young Persons in Canada.
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Foote (Random—Burin—St. George's), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities.
Debate arose thereon.
2012-09-17 [p.1919]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Keddy (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade, for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency and for the Atlantic Gateway) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return:
Q-659 — Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie) — With respect to the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the processing of complaints since the Commission was established, broken down by year and by each provision of the Act under which a complaint was filed: (a) what is the total number of complaints filed with the Commission; (b) what is the average amount of time, in days, allocated to resolving a complaint; (c) what percentage of complaints have been resolved in favour of the complainant; (d) on average, how many complaints has the Commission denied per year; (e) what percentage of complaints have been withdrawn by the complainant before they were resolved; (f) what percentage of complaints were dismissed by the Commission; and (g) are there recurring grounds for dismissal? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-411-659.
2012-06-13 [p.1508]
Group No. 1
Motion No. 1 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 1.
2012-06-13 [p.1508]
Motion No. 2 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 2.
2012-06-13 [p.1509]
Motion No. 5 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 7.
2012-06-13 [p.1509]
Motion No. 8 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 8.
2012-06-13 [p.1509]
Motion No. 9 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 9.
2012-06-13 [p.1509]
Motion No. 10 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 10.
2012-06-13 [p.1509]
Motion No. 11 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 11.
2012-06-13 [p.1509]
Motion No. 12 of Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Ms. Sgro (York West), — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 13.
2012-06-13 [p.1516]
Group No. 2
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 16, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 19.
2012-06-13 [p.1516]
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 17, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 21.
2012-06-13 [p.1516]
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 18, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 23.
2012-06-13 [p.1516]
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 19, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 24.
2012-06-13 [p.1516]
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 20, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 25.
2012-06-13 [p.1516]
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 21, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 26.
2012-06-13 [p.1516]
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 22, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 45.
2012-06-13 [p.1516]
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 23, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 46.
2012-06-13 [p.1517]
Group No. 3
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 24, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 52.
2012-06-13 [p.1529]
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 127, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 53.
2012-06-13 [p.1530]
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 128, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 54.
2012-06-13 [p.1530]
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 129, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 55.
2012-06-13 [p.1530]
Mr. Garneau (Westmount—Ville-Marie), seconded by Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel), moved Motion No. 130, — That Bill C-38 be amended by deleting Clause 56.
Results: 1 - 60 of 608 | Page: 1 of 11

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data