Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 15 of 18
2011-03-25 [p.1411]
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.
Mr. Ignatieff (Etobicoke—Lakeshore), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Wascana), moved, — That the House agree with the finding of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs that the government is in contempt of Parliament, which is unprecedented in Canadian parliamentary history, and consequently, the House has lost confidence in the government.
Debate arose thereon.
2011-03-25 [p.1411]
Mr. Baird (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That this question be now put.
Debate arose thereon.
2011-03-25 [p.1421]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Ignatieff (Etobicoke—Lakeshore), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Wascana), in relation to the Business of Supply;
And of the motion of Mr. Baird (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons).
The debate continued.
2011-03-25 [p.1421]
Pursuant to Standing Order 81(17), the House proceeded to the putting of the question on the motion of Mr. Ignatieff (Etobicoke—Lakeshore), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Wascana), — That the House agree with the finding of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs that the government is in contempt of Parliament, which is unprecedented in Canadian parliamentary history, and consequently, the House has lost confidence in the government.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 204 -- Vote no 204) - View vote details.
YEAS: 156, NAYS: 145
2011-03-23 [p.1399]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants), seconded by Mr. Proulx (Hull—Aylmer), — That the 27th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 21, 2011, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 21)
The debate continued.
2011-03-23 [p.1401]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants), seconded by Mr. Proulx (Hull—Aylmer), — That the 27th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 21, 2011, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 21)
The debate continued.
2011-03-23 [p.1402]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants), seconded by Mr. Proulx (Hull—Aylmer), — That the 27th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 21, 2011, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 21)
The debate continued.
2011-03-21 [p.1358]
Mr. Preston (Elgin—Middlesex—London), from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the 27th Report of the Committee, "Question of Privilege Relating to the Failure of the Government to Fully Provide the Documents as Ordered By the House". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-403-227.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 49 to 52) was tabled.
2011-03-09 [p.1330]
A question of privilege having been raised by Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants), the Speaker ruled that there was a prima facie case of privilege;
Whereupon, Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants), seconded by Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South), moved, — That, given the finding that a prima facie breach of the privileges of Parliament has been committed by the government for failing to fully provide the documents as ordered by the House, the matter be hereby referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs for a final determination on the government's compliance, or lack thereof, and that the Committee report back its findings and recommendations no later than March 21, 2011.
Debate arose thereon.
2011-03-09 [p.1331]
A question of privilege having been raised by Mr. McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood), the Speaker ruled that there was a prima facie case of privilege;
Whereupon, Mr. McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood), seconded by Mr. Valeriote (Guelph), moved, — That the matter concerning statements by the Minister of International Cooperation be referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs; and that the Committee report back no later than March 25, 2011.
Debate arose thereon.
Results: 1 - 15 of 18 | Page: 1 of 2

1
2
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data