Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 15 of 29
2009-12-10 [p.1185]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) for Mr. Strahl (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians and Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), Bill C-63, An Act to amend the First Nations Commercial and Industrial Development Act and another Act in consequence thereof, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act to amend the First Nations Commercial and Industrial Development Act and another Act in consequence thereof”.
2009-11-20 [p.1063]
— by Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North), one concerning aboriginal affairs (No. 402-1244);
2009-11-16 [p.1029]
— No. 402-0997 concerning the fishing industry. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-402-51-04;
2009-11-16 [p.1030]
Q-424 — Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With regard to the current pandemic of new influenza A (H1N1) virus in Aboriginal (First Nations, Inuit, Metis) communities in Canada: (a) what were the containment measures taken to slow the spread of the virus within households, between households, and among communities; (b) what were the control measures taken in more remote areas to flatten the epidemiological peak; (c) what was the average length of time from symptoms to treatment for those Aboriginal peoples who required a stay in intensive care unit (ICU); (d) what percentage of hospitalizations, ICU cases, and deaths were among Aboriginal peoples, and how do these compare with the Canadian population at large; (e) what was the average length of time on a ventilator and the mean length of stay in an ICU for Aboriginal peoples; (f) what specific measures are being planned to reduce the time to treatment, hospitalizations, ICU, and deaths; (g) when will the results of the preliminary investigation in First Nations communities be available, specifically, (i) how many Aboriginal communities in Canada have a revised H1N1 pandemic influenza plan, (ii) how many have tested their plan, (iii) how many have necessary supplies in place; (h) what specific actions have been undertaken to address the fact that only two of 30 communities in northern Manitoba had a pandemic plan, and none had been tested; (i) where did the Minister of Health obtain the 90 percent figure she used in her August 28 response letter to Drs Bennett and Duncan; (j) what funding have Aboriginal communities requested, and what additional funds have been made available to Aboriginal communities for pandemic planning and response in 2009; (k) is there any encouragement to identify vulnerable people, such as pregnant women and those with underlying medical conditions, to take additional precautions, specifically, (i) how many communities lack necessary clean water for infection control measures, (ii) what funding and progress has been made to address this situation; (l) what measures are being put into place to decrease transmission in households where there is overcrowding; (m) are all Aboriginal people on the priority list for vaccine, or just communities in remote and isolated settings; (n) are anti-virals pre-positioned in all Aboriginal communities, should they be required urgently, and are there provisions for communities without registered nurses; and (o) what measures exist to ensure that remote and isolated communities will have the necessary human resources to ensure appropriate and timely treatment, particularly in communities where weather may impact help? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-424.
2009-11-04 [p.1008]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Calkins (Wetaskiwin), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Desnethé--Missinippi--Churchill River), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should examine First Nations cadet programs and develop a plan to facilitate, promote and help monitor First Nations community cadet programs across Canada. (Private Members' Business M-271)
The debate continued.
2009-10-06 [p.876]
Mr. Calkins (Wetaskiwin), seconded by Mr. Clarke (Desnethé--Missinippi--Churchill River), moved, — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should examine First Nations cadet programs and develop a plan to facilitate, promote and help monitor First Nations community cadet programs across Canada. (Private Members' Business M-271)
Debate arose thereon.
2009-10-01 [p.860]
— by Mr. Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake), two concerning the Canada Post Corporation (Nos. 402-0995 and 402-0996) and one concerning the fishing industry (No. 402-0997);
2009-09-30 [p.846]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Strahl (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians and Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency) laid upon the Table, — Annual Report of the Westbank First Nation Self-Government for 2006-2007. — Sessional Paper No. 8525-402-28.
2009-09-18 [p.791]
Mrs. Smith (Kildonan—St. Paul), from the Standing Committee on Health, presented the Sixth Report of the Committee (Health Canada's distribution of body bags). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-402-134.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 32) was tabled.
2009-09-14 [p.730]
Q-321 — Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan) — With regards to the performance of First Nations child welfare programs and services: (a) when does Indian and Northern Affairs Canada plan on conducting its next joint policy review of First Nations child welfare, in which federal child welfare funding is compared with provincial funding levels; (b) does the government, in exact figures, currently know how federal funding of child welfare currently compares to the funding levels of child welfare services and programs in the provinces, if yes, with which provinces has the government conducted comparisons and what are the exact numbers that describe the difference between federal and provincial funding levels; (c) what consultation has been done with First Nations and outside experts in establishing performance indicators for First Nations child welfare programs, if any consultation was done, with whom has the government consulted and what were the results of this consultation; (d) are there any plans on establishing or funding a central body to monitor and provide feedback to Indian and Northern Affairs Canada about the performance of child welfare programs; and (e) what plans does the government have to incorporate First Nations in the development of performance reports and the analysis of programs in order to provide a more complete perspective with greater transparency and accountability? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-321.
2009-08-19 [p.766]
— by Mr. Strahl (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians) — Response of the government, pursuant to Standing Order 109, to the Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, "Chapter 4 - First Nations Child and Family Services Program - Indian and Northern Affairs Canada of the May 2008 Report of the Auditor General" (Sessional Paper No. 8510-402-43), presented to the House on Tuesday, March 24, 2009. — Sessional Paper No. 8512-402-43.
2009-06-19 [p.522]
Q-216 — Ms. Ashton (Churchill) — With regards to the Broadband for Rural and Northern Development Program Pilot Program: (a) how much did the program cost on an annual basis; (b) did the government achieve its stated goal of universal access by 2005 and, if not, what level of coverage did it achieve, overall and in each participating community and what factors prevented the program from attaining universal access; (c) for what reasons was the program not expanded beyond the pilot stage; (d) which communities participated in the pilot project, what funding did each community receive on an annual basis and what level of accessibility did each recipient community achieve; (e) what was the funding allocation, broken down by province; (f) what is the current level of broadband connectivity in each area that took part in the pilot program; (g) according to province, which communities are still without broadband access and how many of those are First Nations; (h) on a per capita basis for the last five years, how does access to broadband in rural and northern communities compare with Canada’s major urban centres; and (i) what strategies is the government currently undertaking to improve broadband access to rural and northern communities and what resources have been committed to such initiatives? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-216.
2009-06-15 [p.636]
Pursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mr. Strahl (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians), seconded by Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), Bill C-41, An Act to give effect to the Maanulth First Nations Final Agreement and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act to give effect to the Maanulth First Nations Final Agreement and to make consequential amendments to other Acts”.
2009-06-12 [p.629]
Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Notice of a Ways and Means motion to introduce an Act to give effect to the Maanulth First Nations Final Agreement and to make consequential amendments to other Acts. (Ways and Means No. 8) — Sessional Paper No. 8570-402-13.
Pursuant to Standing Order 83(2), at the request of Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), an Order of the Day was designated for the consideration of this Ways and Means motion.
2009-06-12 [p.630]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — The Maa-nulth First Nations Final Agreement and related Appendices, the Maa-nulth First Nations Tax Treatment Agreement and the Maa-nulth First Nations Harvest Agreement. — Sessional Paper No. 8525-402-25.
Results: 1 - 15 of 29 | Page: 1 of 2

1
2
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data