Journals
 
 
 
RSS feed based on search criteria Export search results - CSV (plain text) Export search results - XML
Add search criteria
2009-12-09 [p.1174]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:
Group No. 1 — Motions Nos. 1 to 3.
2009-12-09 [p.1174]
Group No. 1
Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-62 be amended by deleting Clause 14.
2009-12-09 [p.1174]
Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-62 be amended by deleting Clause 15.
2009-12-09 [p.1174]
Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-62 be amended by deleting Clause 37.
2009-12-09 [p.1175]
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 2, was deferred.
2009-12-09 [p.1175]
The question was put on Motion No. 3 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.
2009-12-09 [p.1175]
Group No. 1
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain), — That Bill C-62 be amended by deleting Clause 14.
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 150 -- Vote no 150) - View vote details.
YEAS: 37, NAYS: 253
Accordingly, Motion No. 2 was also negatived on the same division.
2009-12-09 [p.1177]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 3 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain), — That Bill C-62 be amended by deleting Clause 37.
The question was put on Motion No. 3 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 151 -- Vote no 151) - View vote details.
YEAS: 37, NAYS: 253
2009-11-02 [p.975]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:
Group No. 1 — Motions Nos. 1 to 3.
2009-11-02 [p.975]
Group No. 1
Mr. Van Loan (Minister of Public Safety) for Ms. Finley (Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing lines 9 to 25 on page 1 with the following:“(a) the number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of a claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), in which case (i) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant on or after January 4, 2009 that has not ended on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is increased by the number of weeks by which the number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of the claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), and (ii) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant during the period that begins on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force and ends on September 11, 2010, if the maximum number of weeks during which benefits may be paid to the claimant under subsection 12(2) is equal to or greater than 51 weeks as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), the length of the claimant’s benefit period is that maximum number of weeks increased by two weeks; or(b) the number of weeks of benefits set out in Schedule 10 to the Budget Implementation Act, 2009 that applies in respect of a claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of sections 3 to 6 of An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits, introduced in the second session of the fortieth Parliament as Bill C-50, in which case(i) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant on or after January 4, 2009 that has not ended on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is increased by the number of weeks by which the number of weeks of benefits set out in that Schedule 10 that applies in respect of the claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of those sections 3 to 6, and(ii) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant during the period that begins on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force and ends on September 11, 2010, if the maximum number of weeks during which benefits may be paid to the claimant under that Schedule 10 is equal to or greater than 51 weeks as a result of the application of any of those sections 3 to 6, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is that maximum number of weeks increased by two weeks.”Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(3))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in the following amendment to Bill C-50, “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits”: That Bill C-50, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing lines 9 to 25 on page 1 with the following:
“(a) the number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of a claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), in which case (i) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant on or after January 4, 2009 that has not ended on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is increased by the number of weeks by which the number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of the claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), and (ii) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant during the period that begins on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force and ends on September 11, 2010, if the maximum number of weeks during which benefits may be paid to the claimant under subsection 12(2) is equal to or greater than 51 weeks as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), the length of the claimant’s benefit period is that maximum number of weeks increased by two weeks; or(b) the number of weeks of benefits set out in Schedule 10 to the Budget Implementation Act, 2009 that applies in respect of a claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of sections 3 to 6 of An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits, introduced in the second session of the fortieth Parliament as Bill C-50, in which case(i) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant on or after January 4, 2009 that has not ended on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is increased by the number of weeks by which the number of weeks of benefits set out in that Schedule 10 that applies in respect of the claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of those sections 3 to 6, and(ii) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant during the period that begins on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force and ends on September 11, 2010, if the maximum number of weeks during which benefits may be paid to the claimant under that Schedule 10 is equal to or greater than 51 weeks as a result of the application of any of those sections 3 to 6, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is that maximum number of weeks increased by two weeks.”
2009-11-02 [p.977]
Mr. Van Loan (Minister of Public Safety) for Ms. Finley (Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 23 to 26 on page 2 with the following:“during the period that begins on January 4, 2009”Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(3))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in the following amendment to Bill C-50, “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits”: That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 23 to 26 on page 2 with the following:
“during the period that begins on January 4, 2009”
2009-11-02 [p.978]
Mr. Van Loan (Minister of Public Safety) for Ms. Finley (Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing lines 9 to 12 on page 6 with the following:“begins on January 4, 2009 and ends”Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(3))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in the following amendment to Bill C-50, “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits”: That Bill C-50, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing lines 9 to 12 on page 6 with the following:
“begins on January 4, 2009 and ends”
2009-11-02 [p.981]
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 2 and 3, was deferred until later today, at the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders.
2009-09-30 [p.852]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Mr. Ménard (Marc-Aurèle-Fortin), seconded by Mr. Lemay (Abitibi—Témiscamingue), — That Bill C-268 be amended by deleting Clause 2.
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 107 -- Vote no 107) - View vote details.
YEAS: 46, NAYS: 239
2009-09-29 [p.842]
Motion No. 1 of Mr. Ménard (Marc-Aurèle-Fortin), seconded by Mr. Lemay (Abitibi—Témiscamingue), — That Bill C-268 be amended by deleting Clause 2.
The debate continued on Motion No. 1.
Results: 1 - 15 of 101 | Page: 1 of 7

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
>
>|