Journals
 
 
 
RSS feed based on search criteria Export search results - CSV (plain text) Export search results - XML
Add search criteria
2009-12-10 [p.1197]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(12), Mr. Toews (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
2009-12-10 [p.1197]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on division.
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
2009-12-09 [p.1174]
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-62, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment.
2009-12-09 [p.1174]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:
Group No. 1 — Motions Nos. 1 to 3.
2009-12-09 [p.1174]
Group No. 1
Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-62 be amended by deleting Clause 14.
2009-12-09 [p.1174]
Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-62 be amended by deleting Clause 15.
2009-12-09 [p.1174]
Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-62 be amended by deleting Clause 37.
2009-12-09 [p.1175]
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division, which also applies to Motion No. 2, was deferred.
2009-12-09 [p.1175]
The question was put on Motion No. 3 and, pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the recorded division was deferred.
2009-12-09 [p.1175]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(8), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded divisions at report stage of Bill C-62, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment.
2009-12-09 [p.1175]
Group No. 1
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain), — That Bill C-62 be amended by deleting Clause 14.
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 150 -- Vote no 150) - View vote details.
YEAS: 37, NAYS: 253
Accordingly, Motion No. 2 was also negatived on the same division.
2009-12-09 [p.1177]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 3 of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain), — That Bill C-62 be amended by deleting Clause 37.
The question was put on Motion No. 3 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 151 -- Vote no 151) - View vote details.
YEAS: 37, NAYS: 253
2009-12-09 [p.1178]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
2009-12-09 [p.1178]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 152 -- Vote no 152) - View vote details.
YEAS: 253, NAYS: 37
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
2009-12-02 [p.1120]
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-56, An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, as reported by the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities with amendments.
Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) for Ms. Finley (Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill, as amended, be concurred in at report stage.
2009-12-02 [p.1121]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on division.
Accordingly, the Bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage.
2009-11-23 [p.1067]
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, as reported by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights with amendments.
Mr. Day (Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Asia-Pacific Gateway) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice), seconded by Mr. Fletcher (Minister of State (Democratic Reform)), moved, — That the Bill, as amended, be concurred in at report stage.
2009-11-23 [p.1067]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on division.
Accordingly, the Bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage.
2009-11-19 [p.1059]
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-291, An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (coming into force of sections 110, 111 and 171), as reported by the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration without amendment.
Mr. St-Cyr (Jeanne-Le Ber), seconded by Mr. Bigras (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
2009-11-19 [p.1059]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
2009-11-06 [p.1021]
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-51, An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on January 27, 2009 and to implement other measures, as reported by the Standing Committee on Finance without amendment.
Mr. Kent (Minister of State of Foreign Affairs (Americas)) for Mr. Flaherty (Minister of Finance), seconded by Mr. Ashfield (Minister of State (Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency)), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
2009-11-06 [p.1021]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
2009-11-02 [p.975]
Item No. 1 in the order of precedence, standing in the name of Mr. St-Cyr (Jeanne-Le Ber), was called and, not having been proceeded with, in accordance with Standing Order 42(2), dropped to the bottom of the order of precedence on the Order Paper. (Private Members' Business C-291)
2009-11-02 [p.975]
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-50, An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits, as reported by the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities without amendment.
2009-11-02 [p.975]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:
Group No. 1 — Motions Nos. 1 to 3.
2009-11-02 [p.975]
Group No. 1
Mr. Van Loan (Minister of Public Safety) for Ms. Finley (Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved Motion No. 1, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing lines 9 to 25 on page 1 with the following:“(a) the number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of a claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), in which case (i) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant on or after January 4, 2009 that has not ended on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is increased by the number of weeks by which the number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of the claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), and (ii) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant during the period that begins on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force and ends on September 11, 2010, if the maximum number of weeks during which benefits may be paid to the claimant under subsection 12(2) is equal to or greater than 51 weeks as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), the length of the claimant’s benefit period is that maximum number of weeks increased by two weeks; or(b) the number of weeks of benefits set out in Schedule 10 to the Budget Implementation Act, 2009 that applies in respect of a claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of sections 3 to 6 of An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits, introduced in the second session of the fortieth Parliament as Bill C-50, in which case(i) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant on or after January 4, 2009 that has not ended on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is increased by the number of weeks by which the number of weeks of benefits set out in that Schedule 10 that applies in respect of the claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of those sections 3 to 6, and(ii) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant during the period that begins on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force and ends on September 11, 2010, if the maximum number of weeks during which benefits may be paid to the claimant under that Schedule 10 is equal to or greater than 51 weeks as a result of the application of any of those sections 3 to 6, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is that maximum number of weeks increased by two weeks.”Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(3))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in the following amendment to Bill C-50, “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits”: That Bill C-50, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing lines 9 to 25 on page 1 with the following:
“(a) the number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of a claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), in which case (i) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant on or after January 4, 2009 that has not ended on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is increased by the number of weeks by which the number of weeks of benefits set out in the table in Schedule I that applies in respect of the claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), and (ii) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant during the period that begins on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force and ends on September 11, 2010, if the maximum number of weeks during which benefits may be paid to the claimant under subsection 12(2) is equal to or greater than 51 weeks as a result of the application of any of subsections 12(2.1) to (2.4), the length of the claimant’s benefit period is that maximum number of weeks increased by two weeks; or(b) the number of weeks of benefits set out in Schedule 10 to the Budget Implementation Act, 2009 that applies in respect of a claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of sections 3 to 6 of An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits, introduced in the second session of the fortieth Parliament as Bill C-50, in which case(i) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant on or after January 4, 2009 that has not ended on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is increased by the number of weeks by which the number of weeks of benefits set out in that Schedule 10 that applies in respect of the claimant is increased as a result of the application of any of those sections 3 to 6, and(ii) in respect of a benefit period established for the claimant during the period that begins on the day on which this subsection is deemed to have come into force and ends on September 11, 2010, if the maximum number of weeks during which benefits may be paid to the claimant under that Schedule 10 is equal to or greater than 51 weeks as a result of the application of any of those sections 3 to 6, the length of the claimant’s benefit period is that maximum number of weeks increased by two weeks.”
2009-11-02 [p.977]
Mr. Van Loan (Minister of Public Safety) for Ms. Finley (Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved Motion No. 2, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 23 to 26 on page 2 with the following:“during the period that begins on January 4, 2009”Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(3))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in the following amendment to Bill C-50, “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits”: That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 23 to 26 on page 2 with the following:
“during the period that begins on January 4, 2009”
2009-11-02 [p.978]
Mr. Van Loan (Minister of Public Safety) for Ms. Finley (Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved Motion No. 3, — That Bill C-50, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing lines 9 to 12 on page 6 with the following:“begins on January 4, 2009 and ends”Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(3))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in the following amendment to Bill C-50, “An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits”: That Bill C-50, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing lines 9 to 12 on page 6 with the following:
“begins on January 4, 2009 and ends”
2009-11-02 [p.981]
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-50, An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and to increase benefits, as reported by the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities without amendment;
And of the motions in Group No. 1 (Motions Nos. 1 to 3).
2009-11-02 [p.981]
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded division, which also applies to Motions Nos. 2 and 3, was deferred until later today, at the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders.
2009-11-02 [p.981]
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-27, An Act to promote the efficiency and adaptability of the Canadian economy by regulating certain activities that discourage reliance on electronic means of carrying out commercial activities, and to amend the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Act, the Competition Act, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and the Telecommunications Act, as reported by the Standing Committee on Industry, Science and Technology with amendments.
Mr. Toews (President of the Treasury Board) for Mr. Clement (Minister of Industry), seconded by Mr. Day (Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Asia-Pacific Gateway), moved, — That the Bill, as amended, be concurred in at report stage.
2009-11-02 [p.981]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage.
2009-11-02 [p.986]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) for Ms. Finley (Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage with amendments.
2009-11-02 [p.986]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 122 -- Vote no 122) - View vote details.
YEAS: 161, NAYS: 86
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage with amendments and ordered for a third reading at the next sitting of the House.
2009-10-20 [p.922]
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill S-4, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (identity theft and related misconduct), as reported by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights without amendment.
Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State) for Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice), seconded by Mrs. Ablonczy (Minister of State (Small Business and Tourism)), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
2009-10-20 [p.922]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
2009-09-30 [p.852]
Pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division at report stage of Bill C-268, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (minimum sentence for offences involving trafficking of persons under the age of eighteen years), as reported by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights with an amendment.
2009-09-30 [p.852]
The House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on Motion No. 1 of Mr. Ménard (Marc-Aurèle-Fortin), seconded by Mr. Lemay (Abitibi—Témiscamingue), — That Bill C-268 be amended by deleting Clause 2.
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and it was negatived on the following division:
(Division No. 107 -- Vote no 107) - View vote details.
YEAS: 46, NAYS: 239
2009-09-30 [p.853]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(9), Mrs. Smith (Kildonan—St. Paul), seconded by Mr. Saxton (North Vancouver), moved, — That the Bill, as amended, be concurred in at report stage.
2009-09-30 [p.853]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 108 -- Vote no 108) - View vote details.
YEAS: 239, NAYS: 46
Accordingly, the Bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage.
2009-09-29 [p.841]
The House resumed consideration at report stage of Bill C-268, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (minimum sentence for offences involving trafficking of persons under the age of eighteen years), as reported by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights with an amendment;
And of Motion No. 1.
2009-09-29 [p.842]
Motion No. 1 of Mr. Ménard (Marc-Aurèle-Fortin), seconded by Mr. Lemay (Abitibi—Témiscamingue), — That Bill C-268 be amended by deleting Clause 2.
The debate continued on Motion No. 1.
2009-09-29 [p.842]
The question was put on Motion No. 1 and, pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, September 30, 2009, immediately before the time provided for Private Members' Business.
2009-09-15 [p.775]
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-268, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (minimum sentence for offences involving trafficking of persons under the age of eighteen years), as reported by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights with an amendment.
2009-06-19 [p.528]
The Committee considered the Bill and reported it without amendment.
2009-06-19 [p.528]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(12), Mr. Toews (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
2009-06-19 [p.528]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 98 -- Vote no 98) - View vote details.
YEAS: 214, NAYS: 82
(See list under Division No. 96)
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
2009-06-19 [p.531]
The Committee considered the Bill and reported it without amendment.
2009-06-19 [p.531]
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(12), Mr. Toews (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. Hill (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That the Bill be concurred in at report stage.
2009-06-19 [p.531]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 102 -- Vote no 102) - View vote details.
YEAS: 214, NAYS: 82
(See list under Division No. 100)
Accordingly, the Bill was concurred in at report stage.
2009-06-17 [p.660]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, when the House begins debate on the second reading motion of Bill C-38, An Act to amend the Canada National Parks Act to enlarge Nahanni National Park Reserve of Canada, a Member from each recognized party may speak for not more than ten minutes, after which the Bill shall be deemed to have been read a second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole, deemed considered in Committee of the Whole, deemed reported without amendment, deemed concurred in at report stage and deemed read a third time and passed.
2009-06-17 [p.660]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-32, An Act to amend the Tobacco Act, be deemed concurred in at report stage; the said Bill be ordered for consideration at third reading stage later this day; and that when the House begins debate on the third reading motion of Bill C-32, a Member from each recognized party may speak for not more than ten minutes, after which the Bill shall be deemed read a third time and passed.
2009-06-17 [p.662]
The Order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development of Bill C-38, An Act to amend the Canada National Parks Act to enlarge Nahanni National Park Reserve of Canada.
Mr. Prentice (Minister of the Environment), seconded by Mr. Thompson (Minister of Veterans Affairs), moved, — That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development.
Debate arose thereon.
2009-06-17 [p.662]
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, the Bill was deemed read the second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole, deemed considered in Committee of the Whole, deemed reported without amendment, deemed concurred in at report stage and deemed read the third time and passed.
2009-06-16 [p.644]
The Order was read for the consideration at report stage of Bill C-26, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (auto theft and trafficking in property obtained by crime), as reported by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights with an amendment.
Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice), seconded by Mrs. Yelich (Minister of State (Western Economic Diversification)), moved, — That the Bill, as amended, be concurred in at report stage.
2009-06-16 [p.644]
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to.
Accordingly, the Bill, as amended, was concurred in at report stage.
2009-06-15 [p.637]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, when the House begins debate on the second reading motion of Bill C-41, An Act to give effect to the Maanulth First Nations Final Agreement and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, a Member from each recognized party may speak for not more than ten minutes, after which the Bill shall be deemed to have been read a second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole, deemed considered in Committee of the Whole, deemed reported without amendment, deemed concurred in at report stage and deemed read a third time and passed.
2009-06-10 [p.610]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians may immediately introduce and propose first reading of a bill entitled “An Act to amend the Judges Act”, following which the said Bill shall be deemed read a second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole, deemed considered in Committee of the Whole, deemed reported without amendment, deemed concurred in at report stage and deemed read a third time and passed.
2009-06-10 [p.610]
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, on motion of Mr. Strahl (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians), seconded by Mr. Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada), Bill C-39, An Act to amend the Judges Act, was introduced, read the first time and ordered to be printed.Recommendation(Pursuant to Standing Order 79(2))
Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled “An Act to amend the Judges Act”.
Pursuant to Order made earlier today, the Bill was deemed read the second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole, deemed considered in Committee of the Whole, deemed reported without amendment, deemed concurred in at report stage and deemed read the third time and passed.
2009-06-10 [p.611]
By unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of the House, the report stage motion to Bill C-6, An Act respecting the safety of consumer products, standing on the Notice Paper in the name of the Minister of Health, be amended by replacing the words "advise him or her", in the first paragraph, with the words "provide him or her with public advice"; that the motion be deemed adopted as amended; that Bill C-6 be deemed concurred in at report stage with a further amendment; and that the said Bill be ordered for consideration at third reading stage later this day.
Results: 1 - 60 of 262 | Page: 1 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
>
>|