Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 15 of 82
2011-03-25 [p.1411]
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.
Mr. Ignatieff (Etobicoke—Lakeshore), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Wascana), moved, — That the House agree with the finding of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs that the government is in contempt of Parliament, which is unprecedented in Canadian parliamentary history, and consequently, the House has lost confidence in the government.
Debate arose thereon.
2011-03-25 [p.1411]
Mr. Baird (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), moved, — That this question be now put.
Debate arose thereon.
2011-03-25 [p.1412]
The Speaker laid upon the Table, — Report of the Chief Electoral Officer of Canada following the federal by-elections held in the electoral districts of Dauphin—Swan River—Marquette, Vaughan and Winnipeg North on November 29, 2010, pursuant to the Canada Elections Act, S.C. 2000, c. 9, s. 536. — Sessional Paper No. 8560-403-4-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs)
2011-03-25 [p.1421]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Ignatieff (Etobicoke—Lakeshore), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Wascana), in relation to the Business of Supply;
And of the motion of Mr. Baird (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons), seconded by Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons).
The debate continued.
2011-03-25 [p.1421]
By unanimous consent, the motion "That this question be now put" was withdrawn.
2011-03-25 [p.1421]
Pursuant to Standing Order 81(17), the House proceeded to the putting of the question on the motion of Mr. Ignatieff (Etobicoke—Lakeshore), seconded by Mr. Goodale (Wascana), — That the House agree with the finding of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs that the government is in contempt of Parliament, which is unprecedented in Canadian parliamentary history, and consequently, the House has lost confidence in the government.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 204 -- Vote no 204) - View vote details.
YEAS: 156, NAYS: 145
2011-03-25 [p.1426]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs:
Q-940 — Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain) — With regard to federal funding under the Canada Economic Action Plan in the city of Hamilton, Ontario, for fiscal year 2008-2009 to date: (a) how many projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; (b) what projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; and (c) what was the value of the projects that received funding from a department or agency over this period?
2011-03-25 [p.1426]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs:
Q-941 — Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain) — What is the total amount of government funding since April 2009 up to and including the current fiscal year allocated within the city of Hamilton, Ontario, by (i) department or agency, (ii) initiative, (iii) amount?
2011-03-25 [p.1434]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs:
Q-961 — Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain) — With regard to programs aimed at increasing youth participation in the election process and democratic governance in Canada: (a) what initiatives were undertaken by all departments from fiscal year 2006-2007 to date; (b) what Canadian not-for-profit organizations received funding and were engaged in this process; (c) what was the total funding allocation for these initiatives from fiscal year 2006-2007 to date; and (d) are any new programs planned to be launched in fiscal years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013?
2011-03-23 [p.1397]
Mr. Preston (Elgin—Middlesex—London), from the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented the 28th Report of the Committee (item to remain votable). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-403-231.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 47 and 48) was tabled.
Pursuant to Standing Order 92(3)(b), the report was deemed concurred in.
2011-03-23 [p.1397]
Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants), seconded by Mr. Proulx (Hull—Aylmer), moved, — That the 27th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 21, 2011, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 21)
Debate arose thereon.
2011-03-23 [p.1399]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants), seconded by Mr. Proulx (Hull—Aylmer), — That the 27th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 21, 2011, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 21)
The debate continued.
2011-03-23 [p.1401]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Brison (Kings—Hants), seconded by Mr. Proulx (Hull—Aylmer), — That the 27th Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Monday, March 21, 2011, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 21)
The debate continued.
Results: 1 - 15 of 82 | Page: 1 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data