//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessTabling of DocumentsGovernment Response Tabled— No. 403-1459 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-55-09.8545-403-55-09 Government Response to petitions concerning AfghanistanAfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMilitary exit strategyPetition 403-14592418890//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/957JohnMcKayHon.John-McKayScarborough—GuildwoodLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/McKayJohn_Lib.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessPresenting Reports from CommitteesPresented (sess. paper type)Mr. McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood), from the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, presented the 11th Report of the Committee, "Effectiveness, Management and Operation of the Expenses Incurred for the G8/G20 Summits". — Sessional Paper No. 8510-403-240.Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response.A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meetings Nos. 30, 33, 35, 37, 43 and 56) was tabled.8510-403-240 11th Report of the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates, "Effectiveness, Management and Operation of the Expenses Incurred for the G8/G20 Summits"G-20 SummitG-8 SummitGovernment accountabilityGovernment expendituresGovernment response to committee reportsLiberal CaucusMcKay, JohnSecurityStanding Committee on Government Operations and Estimates241890024189012418902//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-932Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville) — With regard to the backdrops used by the government for the announcements from December 10, 2010, to February 1, 2011, inclusive, and for October 15, 2008, to March 31, 2009, inclusive, for each backdrop purchased, what were: (a) the dates (i) the tender was issued for the backdrop, (ii) the contract was signed, (iii) the backdrop was delivered; (b) the cost of the backdrop; (c) the announcement for which the backdrop was used; (d) the department that paid for the backdrop; and (e) the date or dates the backdrop was used? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-932.8555-403-932 BackdropsCostsDecorative backdropsGovernment advertisingGovernment contractsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMcCallum, JohnOrders for return to written questionsQ-9322418946-Questions on the Order PaperDesignated - referred to a CommitteePursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Finance:Q-947Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — With respect to programs for young families: (a) how many new programs were introduced and how much money was spent by the government since fiscal year 2006-2007 to date (i) across Canada, (ii) by province; (b) which departments were responsible for program administration; (c) how much money was allocated to programs addressing the needs of young families (i) by department, (ii) by province; (d) how many programs for young families were finished and were not renewed since 2006 to date; and (e) how much money was spent for initiatives to support young families under the Canada Economic Action Plan each fiscal year since 2007-2008 to date (i) in total amount by year, (ii) by province?Families and childrenGovernment expendituresGovernment programsNew Democratic Party CaucusQ-947Referral of unanswered written questions to CommitteeStanding Committee on FinanceThibeault, Glenn24190072419008-Questions on the Order PaperDesignated - referred to a CommitteePursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Finance:Q-950Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to federal funding under the Canada Economic Action Plan in the riding of Timmins—James Bay for fiscal year 2008-2009 to date: (a) how many and what projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; and (b) what was the value of the projects that received funding from a department or agency over this period?Angus, CharlieCanada's Economic Action PlanConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusQ-950Referral of unanswered written questions to CommitteeStanding Committee on FinanceTimmins—James Bay24190132419014-Questions on the Order PaperDesignated - referred to a CommitteePursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Finance:Q-959Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — With regard to federal funding under the Canada Economic Action Plan in the riding of Winnipeg Centre for fiscal year 2008-2009 to date: (a) how many and what projects received funding from a department or an agency over this period; and (b) what was the value of the projects that received funding from a department or an agency over this period?Canada's Economic Action PlanConstituenciesGovernment expendituresMartin, PatNew Democratic Party CaucusQ-959Referral of unanswered written questions to CommitteeStanding Committee on FinanceWinnipeg24190312419032-Questions on the Order PaperDesignated - referred to a CommitteePursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development:Q-962Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — With regard to Environment Canada and enforcement: (a) how many full-time enforcement officers are currently employed by the government, broken down by number of (i) inspectors enforcing environmental protection or pollution laws, (ii) investigators enforcing environmental protection or pollution laws, (iii) conservation officers enforcing wildlife laws, (iv) enforcement officers in parks laws; (b) where are each of the officers in (a) based and deployed; (c) what are the budgets and actual expenditures for enforcement for the past five years; (d) what is the breakdown for full-time equivalents in enforcement for headquarters and for the regions for compliance promotion, inspection and investigation, and enforcement, respectively; (e) what increase in full-time equivalents and budget expenditures are anticipated in order to implement the promised improved monitoring regime for the oil sands sector; (f) what is the timeline for the deployment of any increased monitoring and enforcement activity for the oil sands sector; and (g) has the department instituted a specific enforcement and compliance strategy for the oil sands sector?Department of the EnvironmentDuncan, LindaGovernment expendituresInspections and inspectorsInvestigatorsNew Democratic Party CaucusQ-962Referral of unanswered written questions to CommitteeStaffingStanding Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development24190372419038-Questions on the Order PaperDesignated - referred to a CommitteePursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates:Q-963Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Edmonton—Strathcona, specifying each department or agency, initiative or program, year and amount?ConstituenciesDuncan, LindaEdmonton—StrathconaGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusQ-963Referral of unanswered written questions to CommitteeStanding Committee on Government Operations and Estimates24190392419040-Questions on the Order PaperDesignated - referred to a CommitteePursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates:Q-971Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — With regard to all federal funding in the riding of Skeena—Bulkley Valley for fiscal years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011: (a) how many projects received funding from a department or an agency over this period; (b) what projects received funding from a department or an agency over this period; and (c) what was the value of the projects which received funding from a department or an agency over this period?ConstituenciesDavies, DonGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusQ-971Referral of unanswered written questions to CommitteeSkeena—Bulkley ValleyStanding Committee on Government Operations and Estimates24190552419056//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessTabling of DocumentsGovernment Response Tabled— Nos. 403-1433, 403-1438, 403-1448 and 403-1454 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-55-08.8545-403-55-08 Government Response to petitions concerning AfghanistanAfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMilitary exit strategyPetition 403-1433Petition 403-1438Petition 403-1448Petition 403-14542416645//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessTabling of DocumentsGovernment Response Tabled— Nos. 403-1288, 403-1300, 403-1343, 403-1359, 403-1405 and 403-1419 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-55-07;8545-403-55-07 Government Response to petitions concerning AfghanistanAfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMilitary exit strategyPetition 403-1288Petition 403-1300Petition 403-1343Petition 403-1359Petition 403-1405Petition 403-1419War casualtiesWar victims2410085//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-823Mr. Byrne (Humber—St. Barbe—Baie Verte) — With regard to the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO), of which Canada is a Contracting Party: (a) what are the current Contracting Parties to the Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization, otherwise known as the NAFO Convention; (b) which of these Contracting Parties are known by Canada through its diplomatic relations to have ratified the revised NAFO Convention, as adopted by NAFO in September 2007; (c) which of these Contracting Parties are known to have informed the NAFO Depository or the NAFO Secretariat of their ratification, acceptance and approval of the revised NAFO Convention; (d) how much did Canada spend conducting enforcement of NAFO fisheries conservation measures in the NAFO regulatory area in each of fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010, broken down by all departments and agencies; (e) how much did Canada spend on scientific research and fisheries stock assessment in the NAFO regulatory area on NAFO regulated species and on ecosystem research in each of fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010, broken down by all departments and agencies; (f) how much did all other NAFO Contracting Parties spend on conducting fisheries enforcement of NAFO conservation measures in the NAFO regulatory area in each year from 2007 to 2010; (g) how much did all other NAFO Contracting Parties spend on scientific research and fisheries stock assessment and ecosystem research in the NAFO regulatory area in each year from 2007 to 2010; (h) how much did Canada contribute directly to the operation and management of the NAFO Secretariat in each of the fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010; (i) how much did all other NAFO Contracting Parties contribute directly to the operation and management of the NAFO Secretariat in each year from 2007 to 2010; (j) using data supplied in response to subquestions (d) to (i) and using the newly adopted and revised contribution formula for the Contracting Parties adopted by NAFO, what would be an estimate of the Canadian financial contribution to NAFO in 2010 and 2011 and what would be the contribution of each of the other NAFO Contracting Parties in those same years; (k) which NAFO Contracting Parties have filed formal objections to any of NAFO’s management decisions in 2010 and for 2011, what was the original NAFO management decision being objected to and the nature of the objection from the Contracting Party, as well as specific details of the unilateral fishing plan taken by the objecting Contracting Party for each of the years 2007, 2008 and 2009; (l) how many Canadian citations, NAFO Contracting Party citations or NAFO citations have been issued against fishing vessels of Contracting Parties that were believed to be fishing contrary to NAFO requirements within the NAFO regulatory area, which of these citations resulted in convictions of these fishing vessels, which jurisdiction was responsible for prosecuting these infractions and what penalty was assessed as a result of these convictions in each of the years 2007, 2008 and 2009; (m) what was the total number of at-sea fishing days of NAFO Contracting Party fishing vessels operating in the NAFO regulatory area for NAFO regulated species, broken down by Contracting Party; and (n) what was the total number of at-sea fishing days within the NAFO regulatory area conducting on Non-Contracting Parties to the NAFO Convention in each of the years 2007, 2008 and 2009? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-823.8555-403-823 Northwest Atlantic Fisheries OrganizationAtlantic fisheriesByrne, GerryForeign countriesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusNorthwest Atlantic Fisheries OrganizationNorthwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization ConventionOrders for return to written questionsQ-8232410136//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-827Mr. Allen (Welland) — With regard to government expenditures in the communities of Niagara, on an annual basis and broken down by department, what is the amount spent: (a) in the ridings of Welland, Niagara West—Glanbrook and Haldimand—Norfolk from 2004 up to and including the current fiscal year; (b) in the former riding of Erie—Lincoln between 1997 and 2004; (c) in the former riding of Erie between 1993 and 1997; and (d) in the ridings of Niagara Falls and St. Catharines from 1993 up to and including the current fiscal year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-827.8555-403-827 Government expendituresAllen, MalcolmConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusNiagara regionOrders for return to written questionsQ-8272410139//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-854Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — With respect to the Roadmap for Canada’s Linguistic Duality 2008-2013, broken down by year: (a) what were the expenditures of each department involved; and (b) to what line item were these expenditures charged? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-854.8555-403-854 Roadmap for Canada's Linguistic DualityBélanger, MaurilFederal institutionsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOfficial languages policyOrders for return to written questionsQ-854Roadmap for Canada's Linguistic Duality 2008-2013: Acting for the Future2410156//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-856Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — With respect to language training, for each fiscal year from 2005-2006 to 2009-2010: (a) what were the government’s expenditures, broken down by administrative region, on the language training of public servants for the learning of (i) French, (ii) English; (b) what were the amounts, broken down by administrative region, paid out by the government to third parties for the language training of public servants for the learning of (i) French, (ii) English; and (c) what are the names of the third parties that received funding for this purpose? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-856.8555-403-856 Language trainingBélanger, MaurilGovernment expendituresLanguage trainingLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPublic Service and public servantsQ-8562410158//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-857Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — With regard to travel to Vancouver, British Columbia, by government officials and employees for the period January 1, 2009, to present: (a) what is the total number of room nights charged to the government; (b) which departments purchased accommodations in Vancouver during this period; (c) how many room nights were charged to each department; (d) in which hotels were government officials and employees accommodated; and (e) what, if any, standing contracts for hotel accommodations does each department hold and with which hotels? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-857.8555-403-857 Travel by government officials and employeesAccommodation and hospitality servicesCullen, NathanGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPublic Service and public servantsQ-857Travel2410159//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-860Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel) — With regard to projects pertaining to the Italian-Canadian cultural community and the Community Historical Recognition Program (CHRP): (a) how many applications for CHRP grants and contributions related to such projects have been (i) received, (ii) accepted, (iii) rejected; (b) for each application that was approved, (i) what was the name of the applicant organization, (ii) how much money was given to the organization, (iii) what was the nature of the approved program or event; and (c) for each application that was rejected, (i) what was the name of the applicant organization, (ii) how much money did the organization request in its application, (iii) what was the nature of the rejected program or event, (iv) what was the reason for the rejection, (v) how was the rejection communicated to the group in question? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-860.8555-403-860 Italian-Canadian cultural communityCommunity Historical Recognition ProgramGovernment compensationGovernment expendituresItalian CanadiansLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPacetti, MassimoQ-8602410162//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-861Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel) — With regard to the Community Historical Recognition Program (CHRP): (a) how much money was spent informing the Canadian public about the application criteria for the portion of the program that pertains to the Italian-Canadian cultural community and how were these monies spent; and (b) were any monies spent advertising the portion of the CHRP pertaining to the Italian-Canadian cultural community through private organizations and, if so, (i) which private organizations (i.e., newspaper, radio station, community group, etc.) were contracted by the government for this end, (ii) how much money was spent by the government to advertise with each private organization? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-861.8555-403-861 Advertisement of the Community Historical Recognition ProgramCommunity Historical Recognition ProgramGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresItalian CanadiansLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPacetti, MassimoQ-8612410163//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-862Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel) — With regard to the Italian-Canadian Advisory Committee of the Community Historical Recognition Program (CHRP): (a) how often has the committee convened itself to discuss applications and on what specific dates; (b) what internal procedures has the committee put in place to vet applications; (c) has the committee kept records of their deliberations and, if so, what are the contents of these records; (d) how much money has the government allocated to the committee to fulfill its mandate; and (e) what is the total cost to date that the committee has incurred in order to fulfil its mandate, including (i) the item-by-item breakdown of these costs, (ii) the expenses that were reimbursed by the government, (iii) the expenses that were rejected by the government and the reasons for rejecting them? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-862.8555-403-862 Italian-Canadian Advisory CommitteeCommunity Historical Recognition ProgramGovernment expendituresItalian-Canadian Advisory CommitteeLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPacetti, MassimoQ-8622410164//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-921Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — With regard to the Public Appointments Commission: (a) what has been its annual budget for each year from 2006-2007 onwards; (b) how much of this money has actually been spent; (c) what has happened to the remaining funds; (d) how many employees work directly for the Commission; (e) how many employees work on the file in the Privy Council Office; (f) what is the breakdown in expenses for each of the years since its creation, including, but not limited to, staff, office space, travel, contracts, hospitality, etc.; (g) how many Commissioners does the Commission currently have; (h) who are these Commissioners; (i) how much are the Commissioners paid; (j) what is the breakdown for the Commissioner’s office budgets, travel expenses (transportation, hotels, per diems) and hospitality expenses for each year since the Commission’s creation; (k) what is the mandate of the Commission; (l) who does the Commission report to; (m) when was the last review of the Commission; (n) what are the roles, responsibilities and titles for each of the Commission’s employees; (o) what are the names of companies that the Commission has entered into contracts with since 2006; (p) what were these contracts for; (q) how much are these contracts for; (r) were any of these contracts tendered and, if not, were they sole-sourced; (s) how much has the Commission spent for telecommunications devices since 2006; (t) how much has the Commission spent for long distance calls since 2006; (u) what are the deliverables for the Commission; and (v) is there an evaluation process for the commission and, if so, what are the results of that process for each year since the Commission has been in operation? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-921.8555-403-921 Public Appointments CommissionBains, NavdeepGovernment expendituresHuman resourcesLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPublic Appointments CommissionQ-9212410214//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessTabling of DocumentsGovernment Response Tabled— Nos. 403-1337, 403-1356, 403-1364, 403-1374, 403-1377, 403-1390, 403-1404 and 403-1416 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-55-06;8545-403-55-06 Government Response to petitions concerning AfghanistanAfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMilitary exit strategyPetition 403-1337Petition 403-1356Petition 403-1364Petition 403-1374Petition 403-1377Petition 403-1390Petition 403-1404Petition 403-14162381639-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1478).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-14782373922-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1474).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-14742371062//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessTabling of DocumentsGovernment Response Tabled— Nos. 403-1299 and 403-1341 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-55-05.8545-403-55-05 Government Response to petitions concerning AfghanistanAfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMilitary exit strategyPetition 403-1299Petition 403-13412368837-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1459).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-14592368841-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1454);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-14542367087-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1448).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-14482364201-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1438).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-14382363325-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1433);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-14332359695-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1419).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-14192330862-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1416).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-14162327971-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1404).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-14042320087-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1390);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-13902318363-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1377);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-13772310318-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1374);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-13742306273-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1364).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-13642304370-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1356);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-13562299812-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1341).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-13412295894-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1337);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-13372294553-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1299).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-12992293173//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessTabling of DocumentsGovernment Response Tabled— Nos. 403-1100, 403-1109, 403-1125, 403-1134, 403-1136, 403-1147, 403-1148, 403-1163, 403-1166, 403-1179, 403-1182, 403-1191, 403-1196, 403-1207, 403-1220, 403-1230 and 403-1286 concerning Afghanistan. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-55-04;8545-403-55-04 Government Response to petitions concerning AfghanistanAfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMilitary exit strategyPetition 403-1100Petition 403-1109Petition 403-1125Petition 403-1134Petition 403-1136Petition 403-1147Petition 403-1148Petition 403-1163Petition 403-1166Petition 403-1179Petition 403-1182Petition 403-1191Petition 403-1196Petition 403-1207Petition 403-1220Petition 403-1230Petition 403-12862290188-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1288);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-12882290225//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-551Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — With regard to all federal funding in the riding of London North Centre for fiscal years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010: (a) how many projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; (b) what projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; and (c) what was the value of the projects that received funding from a department or agency over this period? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-551.8555-403-551 Government spending in the constituency of London North CentreGovernment expendituresLondon WestMathyssen, IreneNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-5512290238//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-552Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — With regard to all federal funding in the riding of London West for fiscal years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010: (a) how many projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; (b) what projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; and (c) what was the value of the projects that received funding from a department or agency over this period? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-552.8555-403-552 Government spending in the constituency of London WestGovernment expendituresLondon WestMathyssen, IreneNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-5522290239//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-559Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2006-2007 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of British Columbia Southern Interior, specifying each department or agency, initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-559.8555-403-559 Government spendingAtamanenko, AlexBritish Columbia Southern InteriorGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-5592290244//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-571Mr. Trudeau (Papineau) — With regard to all federal funding in the riding of Papineau for fiscal years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010: (a) how many projects received funding from all departments or agencies over this period; (b) what projects received funding from all departments or agencies over this period; and (c) what was the value of the projects that received funding from all departments or agencies over this period? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-571.8555-403-571 Government spending in the constituency of PapineauGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPapineauQ-571Trudeau, Justin2290253//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-573Mr. Dhaliwal (Newton—North Delta) — With regard to Western Economic Diversification Canada, the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec and the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency, how much did each spend on communication in each fiscal year from 2000-2001 to 2009-2010? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-573.8555-403-573 Communication spendingAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyDepartment of Western Economic DiversificationDhaliwal, SukhEconomic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of QuebecGovernment expendituresInformation and communicationLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-5732290255//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-576Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — With regard to Canada's campaign for a non-permanent seat on the Security Council of the United Nations: (a) what are the total expenditures for the campaign; (b) what are the costs and descriptions of travel expenses incurred by each Minister, Parliamentary Secretary and their exempt staff where the campaign was a subject of discussion; (c) what are the costs and descriptions of hospitality expenses incurred by each Minister and Parliamentary Secretary where the campaign was a subject of discussion; (d) what are the costs and descriptions of gifts to foreign officials in support of the campaign; and (e) what are the costs and descriptions of printed materials produced in support of the campaign? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-576.8555-403-576 Security Council of the United NationsDewar, PaulForeign policyGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-576United Nations Security Council2290256//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-579Mrs. Mendes (Brossard—La Prairie) — With regard to the $1.48 billion dollar investment pledged under the ecoENERGY for Renewable Power Initiative, for each of the fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011: (a) what is the total amount of funding that was allotted; (b) what is the total amount of funding that was allotted to boost Canada’s supply of wind sources, and who were the beneficiaries of that funding; (c) what is the total amount of funding that was allotted to boost Canada’s supply of biomass energy sources, and who were the beneficiaries of that funding; (d) what is the total amount of funding that was allotted to boost Canada’s small hydro and ocean energy sources, and who were the beneficiaries of that funding; (e) how many jobs were maintained by the Initiative; and (f) how many jobs were created by the Initiative? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-579.8555-403-579 Renewable Power InitiativeecoENERGY InitiativesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMendès, AlexandraOrders for return to written questionsQ-579Renewable energy and fuel2290259//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-581Mrs. Mendes (Brossard—La Prairie) — With regard to the $400 million dedicated to Canada Health Infoway in Budget 2007: (a) what is the total amount of funding that was allotted for each of the fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011; (b) what is the total amount of funding that was allotted for each province and territory in Canada for each of those fiscal years; (c) what were the specific projects, initiatives and undertakings developed as a result of the funding in each of those fiscal years; (d) what were the emergency room wait times in each of the provinces and territories in the fiscal year before said provinces and territories received their first increment of funding; and (e) what are the emergency room wait times in each of the provinces and territories, for each of those fiscal years, since said provinces and territories received their first increment of funding? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-581.8555-403-581 Health InfowayCanada Health InfowayEmergency roomsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMendès, AlexandraOrders for return to written questionsQ-581Waiting lists in health care2290260//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-584Mr. Rota (Nipissing—Timiskaming) — With respect to the Federal Economic Development Initiative in Northern Ontario and each regional Economic Development Agency: (a) what is the detailed economic projection or forecast for each region of Canada with an Economic Development Agency; (b) what is the detailed economic projection or forecast for Northern Ontario; (c) in detail, what economic benefit did the Economic Development Agency for each region possessing such an Agency provide to that region; (d) in detail, what economic benefit did the Federal Economic Development Initiative in Northern Ontario provide to that region; (e) for each government project in Northern Ontario, what are the (i) name of the project, (ii) location of the project, (iii) amount of government funding, (iv) start date, (v) state of completion, (vi) cooperating agencies; (f) for each government project in each region with an Economic Development Agency, what are the (i) name of the project, (ii) location of the project, (iii) amount of government funding, (iv) start date, (v) state of completion, (vi) cooperating agencies; and (g) in detail, what is the projected economic impact on Northern Ontario of the establishment of a regional Economic Development Agency in Northern Ontario detailed in any and each government report examining, centrally or peripherally, a proposal therefor, produced between 2006 and the present? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-584.8555-403-584 Economic development in Northern OntarioEconomic impactFederal Economic Development Agency for Northern OntarioGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsProgramsQ-584Rota, Anthony2290262//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-595Mr. Wilfert (Richmond Hill) — With regard to the government’s efforts to lobby support for its proposed purchase of F-35 fighter jets for use by the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces: (a) what are the details of all government promotion and communications efforts pertaining to this purchase, including Ministerial and Prime Ministerial travel expenditures relating to these efforts, as well as travel expenses of other government officials or representatives and members of the Canadian Forces who have been dispatched across the country to discuss this issue with private individuals or organizations (i) between January 1, 2010 and May 26, 2010, (ii) between May 27, 2010 and July 15, 2010, (iii) since July 16, 2010; and (b) how many person-hours have officials and officers from the Canadian Forces dedicated to promoting and communicating this purchase since July 16, 2010? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-595.8555-403-595 F-35 fighter jetsAccommodation and hospitality servicesGovernment contractsGovernment expendituresJoint Strike Fighter F-35 aircraftLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPublic consultationQ-595Wilfert, Bryon2290271//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-608Mr. Malhi (Bramalea—Gore—Malton) — Within the constituency of Bramalea—Gore—Malton (named Bramalea—Gore—Malton—Springdale from 2000 to 2004), what was the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 1993-1994 up to and including the current fiscal year, itemized according to (i) the date the money was received in the constituency, (ii) the dollar amount of the expenditure, (iii) the program from which the funding came, (iv) the ministry responsible, (v) the designated recipient? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-608.8555-403-608 Funding in the constituency of Bramalea—Gore—MaltonBramalea—Gore—MaltonGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMalhi, Gurbax S.Orders for return to written questionsQ-6082290284//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-616Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — With respect to Canada's Economic Action Plan: (a) under the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund in the riding of Sudbury, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (b) under the Building Canada Fund – Communities Component in the riding of Sudbury, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (c) under the Building Canada Fund — Communities Component top-up in the riding of Sudbury, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (d) under the Building Canada Fund — Major Infrastructure Component in the riding of Sudbury, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (e) under the Recreational Infrastructure program in the riding of Sudbury, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; and (f) under the Green Infrastructure Fund in the riding of Sudbury, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-616.8555-403-616 Canada's Economic Action PlanCanada's Economic Action PlanGovernment expendituresInfrastructureNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-616SudburyThibeault, Glenn2290292//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-617Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — With regard to the government's expenditures: (a) what was the total global amount spent on hockey tickets by each department, agency, board and commission on an annual basis from fiscal year 2006-2007 to date; (b) since fiscal year 2006-2007 to date, on an annual basis, how much was spent by each department, agency, board and commission on hockey equipment; (c) how much money was invested in building hockey arenas and how many arenas were built across the country under the present infrastructure programs; and (d) how much money was spent on advertising during hockey games? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-617.8555-403-617 Government expendituresGovernment expendituresHockeyNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-617Thibeault, Glenn2290293//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-620Mr. Allen (Welland) — With regard to government advertising from January 1, 2006 to November 30, 2010, on an annual basis: (a) how much was spent on advertising by each department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission, broken down by type of media (television, radio, newspaper, magazine, non-governmental websites, search engine results pages, social network advertising, email marketing, video game, direct marketing, billboard, mobile display advertising, street furniture, cinema, outside wraps of public transportation, in-flight advertisements and other); (b) what companies received contracts to complete this advertising work in each department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission, broken down by type of media as enumerated in (a); (c) how much was spent by each department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission in each province and territory; and (d) how much was spent, broken down by country, by each department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission in international media? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-620.8555-403-620 Government advertisingAllen, MalcolmGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-6202290294//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-621Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South) — With respect to the office of the Prime Minister and the offices of all Cabinet Ministers on December 1, 2010: (a) how many exempt staff were employed in each office; (b) how many departmental staff were employed in each office; and (c) how many exempt staff did each office employ whose annual salary exceeds the maximum limit defined in section 3.3 of the Treasury Board's Policies and Guidelines for Ministers' Offices? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-621.8555-403-621 Exempt staffCabinet ministers' staffGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMcGuinty, David J.Office of the Prime MinisterOrders for return to written questionsQ-6212290295//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-623Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South) — With respect to relief efforts since the earthquake in Haiti in January 2010: (a) what are all the programs and actions announced after the earthquake that were presented as relief for Haitians in the wake of the earthquake; (b) what are all governmental announcement and communications products pertaining to each of the programs and actions identified in part (a), detailing (i) who was present at the announcement, (ii) where it took place or was distributed, (iii) what were the desired headlines, key messages, media lines and desired sound bites described in the message event proposals relative to those announcements or communications products, (iv) the itemized and total cost of each of those products or announcements, including but not limited, to printing costs, costs of transporting staff and ministers, costs of renting the announcement venue, estimated value of public servants' work dedicated to the announcement or product, etc.; (c) as of December 10, 2010, for each program or action identified in part (a), what is (i) the amount of money committed, (ii) the amount of money disbursed, (iii) the amount of money committed that was not taken out of an existing governmental program (i.e., the amount of “new money”); (d) for each program or action identified in part (a), was this program or action ever announced or planned before the earthquake and, if so, what are the details of the announcement or the planning process (i.e., when, where and by whom); and (e) when possible, for previous parts of this question, what is the summation of dollar values across (i) all programs, (ii) actions, (iii) announcements, (iv) communications products? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-623.8555-403-623 Earthquake in HaitiEarthquakesGovernment expendituresHaitiHumanitarian assistance and workersLiberal CaucusMcGuinty, David J.Orders for return to written questionsProgramsQ-6232290297//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-631Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville) — With regard to the full colour backdrops used by the government for announcements such as, but not limited to, the announcement regarding Canada’s response to the Major inquiry, for each backdrop purchased: (a) what were the date(s) (i) the tender was issued for the backdrop, (ii) the contract was signed, (iii) the backdrop was delivered; (b) what was the cost of the backdrop; (c) for what announcement was the backdrop used; (d) which department paid for the backdrop; and (e) on which dates was the backdrop used? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-631.8555-403-631 Colour backdropsGovernment contractsGovernment expendituresInformation disseminationLiberal CaucusMcCallum, JohnOrders for return to written questionsQ-631Signs2290302//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-635Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Nanaimo—Cowichan, specifying each department or agency, initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-635.8555-403-635 Government funding in the constituency of Nanaimo—CowichanCrowder, JeanGovernment expendituresNanaimo—CowichanNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-6352290305//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-637Mr. Harris (St. John's East) — With regard to the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency (ACOA): (a) is ACOA part of the government’s on-going strategic review and, if so, what is the purpose and rationale for a strategic review of ACOA; (b) how many ACOA projects were funded during fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and the current fiscal year; (c) what is the breakdown by province and federal riding of the ACOA projects funded during fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and the current fiscal year, and what is the allocated amount of funding for each of these projects; (d) how many projects were funded by ACOA under Canada’s Economic Action Plan; (e) what projects have been funded by ACOA under Canada’s Economic Action Plan; (f) how much funding was allocated for each of these projects; (g) what is the breakdown by province and federal riding for these projects; (h) what are the funding and full-time equivalent projections for ACOA for fiscal years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013; (i) how much core and project funding has been allocated for each regional development agency in each Atlantic province in 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and the current fiscal year; (j) how much funding was allocated to support operations of the Ottawa office of ACOA during the 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and current fiscal years; (k) how many staff were assigned to work in the Ottawa office of ACOA during the 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and current fiscal years; and (l) what programs or initiatives will sunset in 2010-2011 and are there any new programs to be launched in 2011-2012? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-637.8555-403-637 Atlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyGovernment expendituresHarris, JackNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsProgramsQ-637Strategic review process2290306//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-638Mr. Harris (St. John's East) — With regard to the Atlantic Gateway Initiative: (a) what activities happened on this project during the 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and current fiscal years; (b) how much project funding was allocated for each Atlantic province and for each federal riding during fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and the current fiscal year; (c) what federal departments and agencies have been involved in the implementation of the Atlantic Gateway Initiative since 2007 through to the present; (d) what are the funding and full-time equivalent projections for the Atlantic Gateway Initiative for fiscal years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013; (e) what private companies and consultants have received project funding under the Atlantic Gateway Initiative since 2007-2008 until present; (f) how much funding was committed to each Atlantic province and how much funding was committed by the governments of Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Newfoundland and Labrador in order to match federal funding; (g) when is the Atlantic Gateway Initiative planned to sunset; (h) what is the government's position on the future of this initiative considering the global economic recession; (i) how did the global economic crisis affect the implementation of the Atlantic Gateway Initiative; (j) how many trade missions took place with regard to the Atlantic Gateway Initiative and what were the destinations and cost of each mission from 2007-2008 until present; and (k) what are the names of Canadian representatives from both public and private sector organizations who took part in trade missions from 2007 to 2010 at the government's expense? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-638.8555-403-638 Atlantic Gateway InitiativeAtlantic Gateway StrategyGovernment expendituresHarris, JackInternational trade missionsNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsProgramsProvinces, territories, statesQ-6382290307//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-639Mr. Russell (Labrador) — With respect to the government's efforts to secure a seat on the United Nations Security Council: (a) what were the expenses for (i) travel, (ii) printing, (iii) hospitality, (iv) rentals, (v) translation and interpretation, (vi) professional services, (vii) any other miscellaneous goods or services; (b) who received the contracts for the provision of each such good or service as identified in (a); and (c) to and from which locations and on which dates was the travel undertaken? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-639.8555-403-639 United Nations Security CouncilForeign policyGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-639Russell, Todd NormanUnited Nations Security Council2290308//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-655Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With regard to the $735,000 spent on furniture and high-end furniture purchased from G.H. Johnson's Trading Company Limited during the G20 summit: (a) what are all items purchased and the price paid; (b) if any, what are the items that have been sold and the sale price; (c) what are all items currently in use by the government and by which department is it being used; and (d) what are all items currently in storage and what is the cost associated with the storage? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-655.8555-403-655 G20 SummitFurnishingsG-20 SummitGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-655Simson, Michelle2290317//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-671Mrs. Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine) — With regard to the $33 million dollars spent by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to finance the hiring of private security firms for the G8 and G20 Summits, as indicated in Chief Superintendent Alphonse MacNeil’s report to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security: (a) what were the names of each of the private security firms hired; (b) what were the specific duties, services, undertakings and other such assignments undertaken by each of the private security firms hired; (c) what was the exact amount paid to each of the private security firms hired; (d) what was the duration of each of the contracts entered into with each private security firm; (e) what were the names of each of the private security firms whose contracted duties, services, undertakings and other such assignments included direct interaction with members of the public; (f) what was the specific number of security officers or agents hired from each of the private security firms; (g) what were the specific powers, authorities, protections and privileges to which any and all of the employees of the private security firms were entitled in the performance of the duties for which they were contracted; (h) what was the legislative framework authorizing the RCMP to hire private security firms to support security operations during the Summits; (i) what has the total number of arrests made by employees of each of the private security firms hired for the G8 and G20 Summits; (j) did the Minister of Public Safety enter into any arrangements, with or without the approval of the Governor in Council, with the government of Ontario or with any other province or territory for the use or employment of any private security firms during the Summits to (i) aid in the administration of justice in the province, (ii) carry into effect the laws in force in the province, (iii) support security operations during the G20; (k) did the Minister of Public Safety enter into any arrangements with any municipality in any province or territory for the use or employment of any private security firms during the Summits, to (i) aid in the administration of justice in the province, (ii) carry into effect the laws in force in the province, (iii) support security operations during the G20; (l) if the Minister of Public Safety entered into any arrangement with the government of any province for any of the purposes described above, did the Minister of Public Safety cause to be laid before Parliament a copy of every such arrangement and, if not, will a copy of each of these arrangements be tabled in Parliament, as stipulated in subsection 20(5) of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act; (m) were the employees of each of the private security firms made to undergo any training or other such programs aimed at ensuring that the discharge of their duties was carried out in accordance with Canadian law; (n) in what way were these officers identifiable, either (i) to distinguish them as peace officers distinct from Canadian peace officers or (ii) to make them indistinguishable from Canadian peace officers employed for security operations during the G20; (o) why was it necessary to hire private security firms for the summits, rather than rely on provincial, municipal or territorial law enforcement agencies accountable to the public; (p) in what country, province, or territory is each of the private security firms hired for the summits headquartered; and (q) on what specific site(s) used at the summits did each of the private security firms hired operate? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-671.8555-403-671 G8 and G20 SummitsG-20 SummitG-8 SummitGovernment expendituresJennings, MarleneLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPrivate sectorQ-671Security services2290331//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-704Ms. Murray (Vancouver Quadra) — With regard to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, for every fiscal year from 2000-2001 to today: (a) what are the salary expenses for full-time indeterminate staff within Science Branch, Salmon and Freshwater Ecosystem Division, including area staff; (b) what are the annual operating funds for salmon assessment projects, by geographic area and species, and for the core Science program; (c) what portion of the salary funds are directed to stock assessment versus pure science and what were the associated total operating funds for those two activities; and (d) what are the various sources of funding for stock assessment and science? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-704.8555-403-704 Department of Fisheries and OceansBudgetFisheries stocksGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMurray, JoyceOrders for return to written questionsQ-704Salmon2290347//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-707Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — With respect to Canada's Economic Action Plan: (a) under the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund in the riding of Vancouver East, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (b) under the Building Canada Fund – Communities Component in the riding of Vancouver East, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (c) under the Building Canada Fund — Communities Component top-up in the riding of Vancouver East, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (d) under the Building Canada Fund — Major Infrastructure Component in the riding of Vancouver East, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (e) under the Recreational Infrastructure program in the riding of Vancouver East, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; and (f) under the Green Infrastructure Fund in the riding of Vancouver East, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-707.8555-403-707 Canada's Economic Action PlanCanada's Economic Action PlanDavies, LibbyGovernment expendituresInfrastructureNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-7072290348//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-744Mr. Easter (Malpeque) — With regard to the government’s Economic Action Plan and the province of Prince Edward Island: (a) what was the total amount allocated to projects in the province between the program’s announcement and December 2010; (b) what was to total amount spent; (c) how many direct jobs were created as a result of the expenditures under the Economic Action Plan; (d) what were the total expenditures in each of the four federal electoral ridings; and (e) what were the specific projects by location in each of the four federal electoral ridings? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-744.8555-403-744 Economic Action PlanCanada's Economic Action PlanEaster, WayneGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPrince Edward IslandQ-7442290355//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-746Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — With respect to federal initiatives targeting gangs in Canada: (a) since 2000, how much funding has the federal government provided in total; (b) what are the programs that have been funded in all departments, broken down by department, start and end date, location and funding amount; (c) what projects have been funded through the National Crime Prevention Centre's Youth Gang Prevention Fund, broken down by start and end date, location and funding amount; (d) when will the $11.1 millions funding announced in 2007 for the Youth Gang Prevention Fund expire, and will funding be continued after that date; (e) are any federal law enforcement units dedicated to targeting gangs and, if so, what is the budget for these units and how many full-time equivalents do they employ; (f) what is the government's national strategy to target gangs; (g) what gang exit programming exists in federal prisons; and (h) within the last five years, what are the titles and dates of government studies or reports on gang activity in Canada? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-746.8555-403-746 GangsCriminal gangs and gangstersDavies, DonGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-746Youth Gang Prevention Fund2290356//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-749Ms. Savoie (Victoria) — What is the total amount of government funding for fiscal year 2009-2010 and for the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Victoria, specifying each department or agency, the initiative and the amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-749.8555-403-749 Government spendingGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-749Savoie, DeniseVictoria2290358//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-750Ms. Savoie (Victoria) — With regard to greenhouse gas emissions (GHG): (a) what specific new measures is the government instituting to reduce GHG that will be in effect over the next two years and between 2011 and 2020; (b) what amount will be allocated in the next budget to deliver concrete measures to (i) support climate adaptation in Canada, (ii) reduce GHG from major Canadian emitters, (iii) incent conservation, (iv) increase energy efficiency for new homes and for existing homes and small businesses; and (c) what GHG reductions is the government committing to achieve in the next two years? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-750.8555-403-750 Greenhouse gas emissionsGovernment expendituresGreenhouse gasesNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-750Savoie, Denise2290359//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-755Ms. Coady (St. John's South—Mount Pearl) — With respect to government spending on announcements and press conferences in 2009-2010: (a) how many public announcements and press conferences took place; (b) in what city and venue did they occur; (c) what was the date of the announcement or press conference; (d) for what purpose was the announcement or press conference held; (e) was a backdrop supplied for the announcement or press conference, and, if so, what were the costs incurred for the design, development and installation of the backdrop; and (f) what was the total cost of holding the press conference or announcement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-755.8555-403-755 Government spending on announcements and press conferencesCoady, SiobhanGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusNews conferencesOrders for return to written questionsQ-7552290364//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-756Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — With regard to advertising by the Department of National Defence or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-756.8555-403-756 Government advertisingDepartment of National DefenceGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMcTeague, DanMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-7562290365//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-757Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — With regard to advertising by the Department of Veterans Affairs or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-757.8555-403-757 Government advertisingDepartment of Veterans AffairsGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMcTeague, DanMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-7572290366//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-758Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — With regard to advertising by the Treasury Board or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-758.8555-403-758 Government advertisingGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMcTeague, DanMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-758Treasury Board Secretariat2290367//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-759Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — With regard to advertising by Public Safety Canada or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-759.8555-403-759 Government advertisingDepartment of Public Safety and Emergency PreparednessGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMcTeague, DanMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-7592290368//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-760Mr. Eyking (Sydney—Victoria) — With regard to advertising by the Department of the Environment or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-760.8555-403-760 Government advertisingDepartment of the EnvironmentEyking, MarkGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-7602290369//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-761Mr. Eyking (Sydney—Victoria) — With regard to advertising by Status of Women Canada or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-761.8555-403-761 Government advertisingEyking, MarkGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-761Status of Women Canada2290370//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-762Mr. Eyking (Sydney—Victoria) — With regard to advertising by the Department of Foreign Affairs or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-762.8555-403-762 Government advertisingDepartment of Foreign Affairs, Trade and DevelopmentEyking, MarkGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-7622290371//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-763Mr. Savage (Dartmouth—Cole Harbour) — With regard to advertising by Health Canada or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-763.8555-403-763 Government advertisingDepartment of HealthGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-763Savage, Michael John2290372//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-764Mr. Savage (Dartmouth—Cole Harbour) — With regard to advertising by International Trade Canada or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-764.8555-403-764 Government advertisingDepartment of Foreign Affairs, Trade and DevelopmentGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-764Savage, Michael John2290373//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-765Mr. Savage (Dartmouth—Cole Harbour) — With regard to advertising by the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-765.8555-403-765 Government advertisingAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-765Savage, Michael John2290374//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-766Mr. Savage (Dartmouth—Cole Harbour) — With regard to advertising by the Department of Labour or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-766.8555-403-766 Government advertisingDepartment of Employment and Social DevelopmentGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLabour ProgramLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-766Savage, Michael John2290375//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-767Mr. Eyking (Sydney—Victoria) — With regard to advertising by Industry Canada or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-767.8555-403-767 Government advertisingDepartment of IndustryEyking, MarkGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-7672290376//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-768Mr. Dhaliwal (Newton—North Delta) — With regard to advertising by Public Works and Government Services Canada or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-768.8555-403-768 Government advertisingDepartment of Public Works and Government ServicesDhaliwal, SukhGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-7682290377//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-774Mr. Ignatieff (Etobicoke—Lakeshore) — With respect to the decision to purchase 65 Joint Strike Fighters (JSFs), how much money has the government spent since May 2010 on: (a) flights to events for elected officials, exempt staff, public servants or others via (i) public flights, (ii) charter flights, (iii) Department of National Defence challenger aircraft, (iv) airbuses, (v) Transport Canada aircraft; (b) setting up and holding press conferences or media availabilities related to the JSF, including the date and cost for each; (c) hospitality expenses for events dealing with the JSF; and (d) hotel and local travel costs for anyone travelling on JSF-related business? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-774.8555-403-774 Joint Strike FightersGovernment contractsGovernment expendituresIgnatieff, MichaelJoint strike fightersLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-774Travel2290379//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-788Mr. Murphy (Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe) — With respect to the G8 and G20 summits held in June 2010, including preparatory activities like Sherpa meetings: (a) what are all gifts and promotional items paid for from the Consolidate Revenue Fund, including the value of each gift; and (b) who are the recipients, including name, nationality and role at the summit, and the gift which he or she received? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-788.8555-403-788 G8 and G20 summitsG-20 SummitG-8 SummitGiftsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMurphy, BrianOrders for return to written questionsQ-7882290384//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-793Mr. Regan (Halifax West) — With regard to advertising by the Canada Revenue Agency or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-793.8555-403-793 Government advertisingCanada Revenue AgencyGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-793Regan, Geoff2290386//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-794Mr. Regan (Halifax West) — With regard to advertising by the Minister for La Francophonie or agencies for which the Minister is responsible: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of the agencies for which the Minister is responsible since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-794.8555-403-794 Government advertisingGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMinister for La FrancophonieMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-794Regan, Geoff2290387//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-796Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — With regard to advertising by the Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages, his department or their agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-796.8555-403-796 Government advertisingGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMacAulay, LawrenceMinister of Canadian Heritage and Official LanguagesMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-7962290389//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-797Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — With regard to advertising by Department of Citizenship and Immigration or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-797.8555-403-797 Government advertisingDepartment of Citizenship and ImmigrationGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMacAulay, LawrenceMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-7972290390//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-798Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — With regard to advertising by Natural Resources Canada or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-798.8555-403-798 Government advertisingDepartment of Natural ResourcesGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMacAulay, LawrenceMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-7982290391//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-799Mr. Pearson (London North Centre) — With regard to the Department of Natural Resources, for fiscal years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and the current fiscal year: (a) how much did the Department budget for the Port Hope Area Initiative; (b) how much did the Department actually spend on the Port Hope Area Initiative; and (c) how many additional requests were made to the Treasury Board for the Port Hope Area Initiative, for how much were these requests and were the requests granted? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-799.8555-403-799 Port Hope Area InitiativeDepartment of Natural ResourcesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPearson, Glen DouglasPort Hope Area InitiativeQ-7992290392//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-800Mr. Pearson (London North Centre) — With regards to hospitality expenses: (a) how much did each department and agency spend on alcohol in fiscal years (i) 2006-2007, (ii) 2007-2008, (iii) 2008-2009, (iv) 2009-2010; and (b) what expense amounts were authorized by (i) the Minister, (ii) a delegated exempt staffer in the Minister's office, (iii) the Deputy Minister? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-800.8555-403-800 Hospitality expensesAccommodation and hospitality servicesFederal institutionsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPearson, Glen DouglasQ-8002290393//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-801Mr. Pearson (London North Centre) — With respect to the decision to purchase 65 Joint Strike Fighters (JSFs), how much money has the government spent since May 2010 on: (a) flights to events for elected officials, exempt staff, public servants or others via (i) public flights, (ii) charter flights, (iii) Department of National Defence challenger aircraft, (iv) airbuses, (v) Transport Canada aircraft; (b) setting up and holding press conferences or media availabilities related to the JSF, including the date and cost for each; (c) hospitality expenses for events dealing with the JSF; and (d) hotel and local travel costs for anyone travelling on JSF-related business? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-801.8555-403-801 Joint Strike FightersGovernment contractsGovernment expendituresJoint strike fightersLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPearson, Glen DouglasQ-801Travel2290394//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-802Mr. Pearson (London North Centre) — With respect to Public Works and Government Services Canada, for every project over 5 million dollars which received money from the department in the last 5 years and which involved incurred or currently foreseen cost overruns of 15% or more relative to the initial predictions: (a) what is the name of that project and details on its nature; (b) what is the history of cost predictions for that project, including (i) dates of predictions reviews and amounts of the predictions, (ii) itemized predictions on the costs of different subparts of that project; (c) what are the reasons for the cost overruns; (d) what are the dates at which ministers or their close staff were informed of the cost predictions described in part (b), what was the name of the Minister or staffer that received the information and what is a description of the actions taken, if any, by the Minister in reaction to that information; and (e) what is, in percentage (compared with the initial prediction), and in dollars, the final incurred value or the currently expected value of the cost overrun? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-802.8555-403-802 Public Works and Government Services CanadaCost overrunsDepartment of Public Works and Government ServicesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPearson, Glen DouglasProgramsQ-8022290395//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-803Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — With regard to advertising by the Department of Finance or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-803.8555-403-803 Government advertisingDepartment of FinanceGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-803Valeriote, Frank2290396//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-804Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — With regard to advertising by the Human Resources and Skills Development Canada or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-804.8555-403-804 Government advertisingDepartment of Employment and Social DevelopmentGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-804Valeriote, Frank2290397//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-805Mr. Valeriote (Guelph) — With regard to advertising by the Minister of International Cooperation, the Canadian International Development Agency or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-805.8555-403-805 Government advertisingCanadian International Development AgencyGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMinister of International CooperationMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-805Valeriote, Frank2290398//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-807Mr. Andrews (Avalon) — With regard to the Department of Human Resources and Skills Development and, more specifically, all pilot projects approved by the Department, what is the projected or budgeted financial impact for each of the pilot projects for fiscal years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-807.8555-403-807 Department of Human Resources and Skills DevelopmentAndrews, ScottDepartment of Employment and Social DevelopmentGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPilot projectsQ-8072290399//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-810Mr. Rodriguez (Honoré-Mercier) — With regard to advertising by the Department of Western Economic Diversification or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by each department since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-810.8555-403-810 Government advertisingDepartment of Western Economic DiversificationGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-810Rodriguez, Pablo2290402//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-811Mr. Rodriguez (Honoré-Mercier) — With regard to advertising by the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-811.8555-403-811 Government advertisingEconomic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of QuebecGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-811Rodriguez, Pablo2290403//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-813Mr. McKay (Scarborough—Guildwood) — With regard to advertising by the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by each department since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-813.8555-403-813 Government advertisingDepartment of Indian Affairs and Northern DevelopmentGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMcKay, JohnMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-8132290404//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-814Mr. Karygiannis (Scarborough—Agincourt) — With regard to advertising by the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the Agency and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-814.8555-403-814 Government advertisingCanadian Northern Economic Development AgencyGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresKarygiannis, JimLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-8142290405//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-815Mr. Karygiannis (Scarborough—Agincourt) — With regard to advertising by the Department of Justice or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-815.8555-403-815 Government advertisingDepartment of JusticeGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresKarygiannis, JimLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-8152290406//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-816Mr. Karygiannis (Scarborough—Agincourt) — With regard to advertising by the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the Agency and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-816.8555-403-816 Government advertisingFederal Economic Development Agency for Southern OntarioGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresKarygiannis, JimLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-8162290407//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-817Mr. Karygiannis (Scarborough—Agincourt) — With regard to advertising by Transport Canada and Infrastructure Canada or its agencies: (a) what was the total amount of money spent by the department and each of its agencies since January 1, 2009, in multi-cultural targeted print, radio, television and web-based media; (b) what was the exact placement of each ad purchase; and (c) what was the target demographic of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-817.8555-403-817 Government advertisingDepartment of TransportGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresKarygiannis, JimLiberal CaucusMultimediaOrders for return to written questionsQ-8172290408-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1286).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-12862283905-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1230).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-12302257617-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1220);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-12202252919//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-529Ms. Murray (Vancouver Quadra) — With regard to security spending for the Vancouver 2010 Olympics: (a) within the overall security budget, what was the total portion of the budget funded by the government in dollars and as a percentage; (b) what amount of the overall security budget was allocated to the RCMP; (c) what amount of the overall security budget was allotted to government departments and agencies other than the RCMP, specifying (i) the name of the department or agency, (ii) the amount of funding it received, (iii) the reason for or purpose of the funding; (d) what is a breakdown by category or kind of expenditure of the RCMP’s security budget, including an explanation of the reason for or purpose of the expenditures in each category; (e) at the end of the Olympics, what amount of the RCMP security budget (i) remained unused, (ii) remained unused in each of the categories identified in (d); (f) what about the budgeting process explains any discrepancy identified in (e) between the amount budgeted and the amount spent; and (g) how will any remaining funds be used or reallocated? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-529.8555-403-529 Security spending for the Vancouver OlympicsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMurray, JoyceNational securityOlympic Games winter 2010Orders for return to written questionsQ-529SecurityVancouver2252926-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1207) and one concerning passports (No. 403-1208);AfghanistanCanada-United States relationsCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanFeesGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPassports and visasPetition 403-1207Petition 403-1208TourismWestern Hemisphere Travel Initiative2242494-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1196).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-11962241819-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1191).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-11912236097//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-494Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — With regard to the Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative (APGCI): (a) what activities happened on this project during fiscal years 2008-2009, 2009-2010, 2010-2011; (b) how much project funding was provided or will be provided to each Western province under APGCI, broken down by riding, during fiscal years 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011; (c) what federal departments and agencies have been involved in the realization of the APGCI since 2007 until the present; (d) what are the funding and full-time equivalent projections for APGCI for fiscal years 2011-2012 and 2012-2013; (e) what private companies and consultants received project funding under the APGCI since fiscal year 2007-2008, up to and including the current fiscal year; (f) how will the costs of the APGCI projects be shared between the federal and provincial governments; (g) are there any foreign investments made for APGCI related projects and, if so, what foreign companies made investments for these projects; (h) when is the APGCI scheduled to sunset; (i) what is the federal government's policy position on the future of this initiative, taking into account the global economic recession; (j) did the global economic crisis result in changes to the implementation of the Atlantic Gateway Initiative and, if so, what were they; (k) which countries are Canada’s main competitors and what did the government do to secure Canada's advantages and leading positions; (l) how many trade missions took place in relation to APGCI, where did these take place and how much did they cost, from fiscal year 2007-2008 up to and including the current fiscal year; and (m) what are the names of the Canadian representatives from both the public and private sector organizations who took part in trade missions in relation to APGCI since 2007 to 2010, and by which organization, including government, was their participation funded? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-494.8555-403-494 Asia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor InitiativeAsia-Pacific Gateway and Corridor InitiativeGovernment expendituresJulian, PeterNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-4942236103//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-509Mr. Russell (Labrador) — With regard to government expenditures in Labrador during fiscal years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011: (a) what is the value of (i) each grant, contribution, repayable contribution, loan, or contract for the supply of goods or services made or awarded to any group, business or organization located in Labrador, (ii) each grant, contribution, repayable contribution, loan, or contract for the supply of goods or services made or awarded to any group, business or organization located outside Labrador but for activities carried out within Labrador, (iii) each transfer payment or other payment to the province of Newfoundland and Labrador for work or activities primarily carried out in Labrador, a municipality in Labrador, or a First Nations, Inuit or Innu local government in Labrador; and (b) for each case in (a), (i) what was the specific government department or agency which made the grant, contribution, repayable contribution, loan, contract for the supply of goods or services, or transfer or other payment, (ii) on what date was it made or awarded by the department or agency, (iii) under which program, policy or authority was it made or awarded? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-509.8555-403-509 Government expenditures in LabradorFirst NationsGovernment expendituresInuitLiberal CaucusNewfoundland and LabradorOrders for return to written questionsQ-509Russell, Todd Norman2236111-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1182);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-11822230327-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1179).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-11792227433//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-482Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — With regard to Infrastructure Canada's programs: (a) under the Public Transit Fund (PTF), how much funding was committed for each province and how much funding was spent to date under the PTF; (b) under the Canadian Strategic Infrastructure Fund, (i) to date, what applications for projects have been approved for funding, (ii) for each project, who are the partners involved and what is each partner’s contribution, including the government’s contribution, (iii) for each project, how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (iv) for each project, what was the economic benefit, (v) for each project, what is the anticipated completion date, (vi) what criteria were used to determine which projects were approved; (c) under the Border Infrastructure Fund, (i) to date, by province, what applications for projects have been approved for funding, (ii) for each project, who are the partners involved and what is each partner’s contribution, including the government’s contribution, (iii) for each project, how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (iv) for each project, what was the economic benefit, (v) for each project, what is the anticipated completion date, (vi) what criteria were used to determine which projects were approved; (d) under the Municipal Rural Infrastructure Fund (MRIF), (i) by province, how many municipalities submitted applications and how many projects were approved, (ii) for every fiscal year since the program was launched, up to and including the current fiscal year, how much funding has the MRIF disbursed and to whom, (iii) for each approved project, what was the municipality’s contribution; (iv) were consulting companies hired to support program delivery and, if so, what are their names; (e) under the Infrastructure Canada Program (ICP), (i) by province, how many applications were submitted, (ii) by province and riding, how many applications were approved, (iii) for every fiscal year since the program was launched, up to and including the current fiscal year, how much funding has the ICP disbursed and to whom, (iv) for each project, what was the municipality’s contribution, (v) were consulting companies hired to support program delivery and, if so, what are their names, (vii) when is the anticipated sunset of the program; (f) under the Building Canada Fund - Communities Component, (i) to date, by province and riding, what applications have been approved, (ii) for each project, who are the partners involved and what is each partner’s contribution, including the government’s contribution, (iii) for each project, how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (iv) what criteria were used to determine which projects were approved; (g) under the Building Canada Fund - Major Infrastructure Component, (i) to date, by province and riding, what applications have been approved, (ii) for each project, who are the partners involved and what is each partner’s contribution, including the government’s contribution, (iii) for each project, how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (iv) for each project, what is the anticipated completion date, (v) what criteria were used to determine which projects were approved; (h) under the Public Private Partnership Fund, (i) to date, how many project applications have been submitted, (ii) to date, by province and riding, how many projects have been approved, (iii) for each project, who are the partners involved, including private companies, and what is each partner’s contribution, including the government’s contribution, (iv) for each project, how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, including private companies, (v) what criteria were used to determine which projects were approved; (i) under the Gateways and Border Crossing Fund, (i) to date, by province and riding, what applications have been approved, (ii) for each project, who are the partners involved and what is each partner’s contribution, including the government’s contribution, (iii) for each project, how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (iv) for each project, what is the anticipated completion date, (v) how much funding will be committed to the Atlantic Gateway Initiative and the Asia Pacific Gateway and Corridor Initiative during fiscal years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012, (vi) how much funding remains available in the Fund, (vii) what criteria were used to determine which projects were approved; (j) under the Gas Tax Fund, (i) to date, by province and territory, how much funding has been committed and how much funding has been dispersed, (ii) which municipalities received funding under this initiative and when, (iii) what are the funding criteria under this initiative; (k) by province, how much funding was reimbursed to each municipality under the GST rebate program; (l) how much funding was provided by Infrastructure Canada to partner federal departments during fiscal year 2007-2008 to date; and (m) how much funding was spent to promote each Infrastructure Canada program since fiscal year 2007-2008 to date? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-482.8555-403-482 Infrastructure CanadaGovernment expendituresGovernment programsInfrastructureNew Democratic Party CaucusOffice of Infrastructure of CanadaOrders for return to written questionsQ-482Thibeault, Glenn2227447//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-483Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — With regard to the hospitality expenses of government agencies, boards and commissions, for each fiscal year since 2006-2007, up to and including the current fiscal year: (a) how much was spent on leasing expenses, catering services, restaurants, coffee and beverages, bottled water and petty cash; (b) how much was spent on overseas travel, (i) in which countries, (ii) on what dates did these trips occur, (iii) what was the purpose of each trip, (iv) what was the purpose of each expense; (c) what companies received sole source contracts to provide hospitality services; and (d) how much was spent on limousine services, private air service, executive class commercial air service, economy class commercial air service and car rentals? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-483.8555-403-483 Hospitality expensesAccommodation and hospitality servicesFederal institutionsGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-483Thibeault, Glenn2227448//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-484Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — With regard to the government's expenditures related to the 19th Commonwealth Games: (a) for each fiscal year since 2008-2009, up to and including the current fiscal year, what was the total amount spent on preparation of Canadian athletes by each federal department, agency or commission; (b) for each fiscal year since 2008-2009, up to and including the current fiscal year, what was the total amount spent on sporting equipment for Canadian athletes participating in the 19th Commonwealth Games by each federal department, agency or commission; (c) what was the total amount spent by each federal organization to support the Canadian official delegation visit and how much was spent on (i) hospitality expenses, (ii) travelling expenses, (iii) accommodation, (iv) alcohol, (v) beverages, (vi) food; (d) what was the total amount spent to promote Canada during the 19th Commonwealth Games; (e) what are the names of the people who were part of Canada’s official delegation to the 19th Commonwealth Games; and (f) what private sector company representatives were part of Canada's official delegation and how much money did the government pay for their trips? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-484.8555-403-484 19th Commonwealth GamesCommonwealth GamesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-484Thibeault, Glenn2227449-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1166);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-11662224931//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: Q-446Mr. Malo (Verchères—Les Patriotes) — With regard to the Ontario-Quebec gateway issue, since the 2004–2005 fiscal year: (a) how much money has been invested, broken down by project; (b) which projects have received funding; (c) which projects have been completed; (d) at what stage of completion are the unfinished projects; (e) what have been the yearly budgets, up to and including the present fiscal year; (f) were all the funds allocated in the budgets spent; (g) what are the projected budgets for the coming years; (h) what factors explain why the budgets were not fully spent; and (i) what criteria needed to be met for a project to receive funding? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-446.8555-403-446 Ontario-Quebec gatewayBloc Québécois CaucusGovernment expendituresInterprovincial tradeMalo, LucOntario-Quebec Continental Gateway and Trade Corridor InitiativeOrders for return to written questionsPorts of entryQ-4462224937//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-451Mrs. Crombie (Mississauga—Streetsville) — With regard to the government's Economic Action Plan, for each of the project announcements in the electoral district of Mississauga—Streetsville: (a) what was (i) the date of the announcement, (ii) the amount of stimulus spending announced, (iii) the department which made the announcement; (b) was there a public event associated with the announcement and, if so, what was the cost of that event; (c) how many projects submitted by the City of Mississauga did not qualify for or were denied infrastructure or Recreational Infrastructure Canada program funding; (d) what were the details and locations of the projects that did not qualify or were denied funding; and (e) for each project that was denied funding, what is the detailed explanation of the reasons for the denial? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-451.8555-403-451 Economic Action PlanCanada's Economic Action PlanConstituenciesCrombie, BonnieGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMississauga—StreetsvilleOrders for return to written questionsQ-451Recreational Infrastructure Canada2224939-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1163).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-11632214693-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1148);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-11482206264-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1147).AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-11472204076//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-442Mr. MacAulay (Cardigan) — With respect to the 400th anniversary of the founding of Cupids, Newfoundland and Labrador: (a) what is the total dollar amount spent by the government for the 400th anniversary of Cupids; (b) what non-monetary support was provided by the government to assist with the celebrations; (c) what was the government’s budget for the celebrations; and (d) how much was actually spent on the celebrations? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-442.8555-403-442 Anniversary of the founding of CupidsAnniversaryCupidsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMacAulay, LawrenceNewfoundland and LabradorOrders for return to written questionsQ-4422204083//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-444Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North) — With regard to government polling from January 1, 2006 to September 22, 2010: (a) how much was spent annually (i) broken down by department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission, (ii) broken down by department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission and by province and territory; (b) how much was spent, broken down by type of polling technique (phone, online, focus groups, etc.), (i) annually, (ii) annually by each department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission; and (c) what companies received contracts to complete this polling work, broken down by type of polling technique, (i) annually, (ii) annually by each department, crown corporation, foundation, agency, board and commission? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-444.8555-403-444 Government pollingFederal institutionsGovernment expendituresHyer, BruceNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPublic opinion pollsQ-4442204084//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-455Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to the expenses of the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) for each fiscal year since 2006-2007, up to and including the current fiscal year: (a) what was the total global amount spent on hospitality expenses by each Canadian embassy overseas; (b) how much has each Canadian embassy overseas spent on leasing expenses, catering services, restaurants, alcohol and beverages, bottled water, and petty cash; (c) how much has each Canadian embassy and consulate spent on advertising overseas; (d) what cuts have been made to DFAIT expenditures on Canadian missions overseas during the economic recession and what was the cut in expenditure for each embassy and consulate; (e) what companies have received sole source contracts to provide services for Canadian missions overseas; and (f) how much have Canadian diplomats spent on limousine services, private air services, executive class commercial air services, economy class commercial air services and car rentals? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-455.8555-403-455 Department of Foreign Affairs and International TradeAngus, CharlieDepartment of Foreign Affairs, Trade and DevelopmentEmbassies and consulatesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-4552204087-Daily Routine Of BusinessPresenting PetitionsPresented— by Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona), one concerning Afghanistan (No. 403-1136);AfghanistanCanadian ForcesCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimMilitary exit strategyNew Democratic Party CaucusPetition 403-11362195516//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the return to the following question made into an Order for Return: Q-431Ms. Murray (Vancouver Quadra) — With regard to the Children’s Fitness Tax Credit (CFTC): (a) for each fiscal year since 2007-2008, what was the total cost of the CFTC (i) nationally, (ii) by province and territory; (b) for each fiscal year since 2007-2008, what was the mean income of families that claimed the CFTC (i) nationally, (ii) by province and territory; (c) for each fiscal year since 2007-2008, what percentage of eligible families claimed the CFTC (i) nationally, (ii) by province and territory; (d) for each fiscal year since 2007-2008, for what specific activities were claims made under the CFTC and what was the proportion of funds expended for each activity; and (e) for each fiscal year since 2006-2007, what was the rate of participation in sports among children who meet the eligibility criteria of the CFTC? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-431.8555-403-431 Children's Fitness Tax CreditChildren's fitness tax creditGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMurray, JoyceOrders for return to written questionsQ-431Sports and recreation2194294//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: Q-416Mr. Allen (Welland) — With respect to Canada's Economic Action Plan (EAP): (a) how much money has been committed since the launch of the EAP (i) by province, (ii) by riding, (iii) by department, (iv) by each program activity; (b) how much money has been spent on projects up to and including September 30, 2010 (i) by province, (ii) by territory, (iii) by department, (iv) by program activity; (c) broken down by province and department, what is the project completion rate; (d) what criteria will be used to determine if municipalities are eligible for project extensions beyond March 31, 2011; (e) what is the estimated economic benefit created by each department and each program as a result of the implementation of the EAP; (f) how many full-time and part-time jobs have been created to date, broken down by province, since the implementation of the EAP; (g) how many full-time and part-time jobs were lost to date, broken down by province, since the implementation of the EAP; (h) how much money has been spent to date on Employment Insurance benefits, broken down by province and by month, since the implementation of the EAP; (i) how many green economic stimulus projects have been supported, broken down by province and department, since the launch of the EAP; and (j) what percentage of EAP projects have been completed to date in rural and urban areas of Canada? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-416.8555-403-416 Economic Action PlanAllen, MalcolmCanada's Economic Action PlanEconomic impactExpiration of agreementGovernment expendituresJob creationNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-4162181856//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-417Mr. Allen (Welland) — With regard to expenses for all government departments, since fiscal year 2006-2007 up to and including the current fiscal year: (a) what is the total amount spent on hospitality expenses; (b) how much has been spent on (i) leasing expenses, (ii) catering services, (iii) restaurants, (iv) coffee and beverages, (v) bottled water, (vi) petty cash; (c) how much has been spent on overseas travel, (i) in what countries, (ii) on what dates did these trips occur, (iii) what was the purpose of each trip, (iv) what was the purpose of each expense; (d) how much has been paid to third parties to provide hospitality services; (e) what companies received sole-source contracts to provide hospitality services; and (f) how much has been spent on (i) limousine services, (ii) private air service, (iii) executive class commercial air service, (iv) economy class commercial air service, (v) car rentals? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-417.8555-403-417 Government expensesAccommodation and hospitality servicesAllen, MalcolmGovernment contractsGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-417Travel2181857//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-421Ms. Foote (Random—Burin—St. George's) — What is the total amount of government capital and operation funding, since fiscal year 2008-2009 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Random—Burin—St. George's, identifying each department, agency, funding transfer to provincial and municipal governments and arm's length agency, detailing in each case the initiative and amount, including the date the funding was allocated? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-421.8555-403-421 Government spendingCities and townsConstituenciesFoote, JudyGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-421Random—Burin—St. George'sTransfers to provinces and territories2181858//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-422Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — With regard to contracts by departments and agencies for writing and editing services: (a) how much has each department and agency spent for both services since 2006; (b) what were the corresponding events, releases, speeches, or materials for each contract; (c) who were the contracts paid to; and (d) were any of these tendered? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-422.8555-403-422 Contracts for writing and editing servicesBains, NavdeepGovernment contractsGovernment expendituresGovernment publishingLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-4222181859//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-423Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — With regard to the Prime Minister’s office, Minister’s offices, Minister of State’s offices, and budgets for exempt staff of Parliamentary Secretaries from January 1, 2008 to October 5, 2010: (a) how much was spent on contracts for (i) temporary employment, (ii) consultants, (iii) advice; (b) what are the names of the individuals and companies that correspond to these amounts; and (c) for each person and company in (b), what were their billing periods and what type of work did they provide? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-423.8555-403-423 Government contractsBains, NavdeepCabinet ministersCabinet ministers' staffGovernment contractsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOffice of the Prime MinisterOrders for return to written questionsParliamentary Secretaries of the House of CommonsQ-4232181860//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: Q-407Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — With regard to the Economic Action Plan, for every rejected application in Manitoba: (a) on what date was the application submitted; (b) on what date was a decision reached; (c) in which federal riding would the project have taken place; (d) on what date was the applicant informed of the decision; and (e) what would have been the total federal contribution? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-407.8555-403-407 Economic Action PlanCanada's Economic Action PlanGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusManitobaNeville, AnitaOrders for return to written questionsQ-4072177310//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-408Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre) — With regard to the Economic Action Plan, for every project in Manitoba: (a) on what date was the project announced publicly; (b) was there a public event associated with the announcement and if so, what was the cost of the public event; (c) what was the federal share of the funding; (d) what was the provincial share of the funding; (e) what was the municipal share of the funding; (f) on what date was the application for funding submitted; (g) in what federal riding was it located; (h) what is its description; (i) what is the estimated completion date; and (j) on what date was the application for funding approved? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-408.8555-403-408 Economic Action PlanCanada's Economic Action PlanGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusManitobaNeville, AnitaOrders for return to written questionsQ-4082177311//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-409Mr. Bélanger (Ottawa—Vanier) — With regard to the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), how much money has Canada contributed to date for the implementation of the EITI in each fiscal year since its inception in 2002 and from which departments or agencies did these funds come? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-409.8555-403-409 Extractive Industries Transparency InitiativeBélanger, MaurilExtractive Industries Transparency InitiativeExtractive industryGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-4092177312//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-402Ms. Dhalla (Brampton—Springdale) — With respect to official requests for attendance at events received by the Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages from organizations since January 2008: (a) what were the names of the organizations, the names of the events, the organizers, the dates, times, and locations; and (b) did the Minister attend the event and, if not, what is the name of the government representative who attended the event in lieu of the Minister? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-402.8555-403-402 Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official LanguagesDhalla, RubyGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMinister of Canadian Heritage and Official LanguagesMoore, JamesOrders for return to written questionsQ-402References to members2175690//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-404Mrs. Mendes (Brossard—La Prairie) — With regard to the government’s 2008 report, “A Roadmap to Strengthening Public Safety”, aimed at reviewing the operations of the Correctional Service of Canada (CSC): (a) how much of the $478.8 million over five years set aside in the government’s 2008 Budget has thus far been allotted to the CSC with regards to implementing each of the Roadmap’s five recommendations; (b) of the amount that has thus far been allotted to the CSC since Budget 2008 for the purposes of implementing the Roadmap’s recommendations, what is the breakdown of funding allocated to each of the programs, initiatives, services, inquiries or other undertakings for the 2008-2009, 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 fiscal years; (c) what is the amount reserved for programs, initiatives, services, inquiries or other undertakings for the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 fiscal years; (d) what is the amount reserved for each of the Roadmap’s five recommendations for the 2008-2009, 2009-2010, 2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 fiscal years; (e) since the first increment of government funding to the CSC for the implementation of the recommendations contained in the Roadmap, is there any empirical (statistical or otherwise) evidence indicating that eliminating statutory release will result in greater rehabilitation of prisoners; (f) what are the projected financial costs of eliminating statutory release in Canada; (g) of the total estimated financial costs of eliminating statutory release, how much funding has the government set aside to pay for the costs; (h) what is the criterion used by the government to determine whether the implementation of the Roadmap’s recommendations is successful or reaches its intended results; (i) since the first increment of government funding to the CSC for the implementation of the recommendations contained in the Roadmap, what available statistical indicators permit an objective assessment of the success or failure of each of the programs, initiatives, services, inquiries or other undertakings; (j) since the first increment of government funding to the CSC for the implementation of the recommendations contained in the Roadmap, what has been the amount allotted to correctional programs aimed at the rehabilitational needs of Aboriginal offenders; (k) what are the statistical indicators permitting an objective evaluation assessing whether the building of regional complexes will provide superior results for offender rehabilitation and accountability than the facilities currently used to house offenders; (l) of the amount that has thus far been allotted to the CSC since Budget 2008, for the implementation of the Roadmap’s recommendations, how much funding has been allotted to studying the building of regional complexes, their benefits, and the geographical locations in which these complexes would be situated; (m) what is the anticipated cost of implementing the Roadmap’s recommendation of building regional complexes, and how does the government intend to pay for the construction of these complexes; and (n) since the first increment of government funding to the CSC for the implementation of the recommendations contained in the Roadmap, what progress has the government made towards the construction of regional correctional complexes? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-404.8555-403-404 Correctional Service of CanadaCorrectional Service of CanadaGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMendès, AlexandraOperational reviewsOrders for return to written questionsQ-404Report of the Correctional Service of Canada Review Panel: A Roadmap to Strengthening Public Safety2175691//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: Q-376Mrs. Beaudin (Saint-Lambert) — With respect to the Canada Summer Jobs program: (a) for each of the 308 federal ridings in Canada, how much money, how many positions and how many hours of work were allocated for the fiscal year 2010-2011; (b) for each of the 308 ridings, how many positions and how many hours were requested for the fiscal year 2010-2011; (c) in mathematical terms, and with all variables defined, what was the formula used in the fiscal year 2010-2011 to determine the funding granted to each riding; and (d) what share of the overall funding, in both percentage and dollar terms, has been paid to ridings in Quebec, for every fiscal year since 2006-2007? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-376.8555-403-376 Canada Summer Jobs programBeaudin, JoséeBloc Québécois CaucusCanada Summer JobsConstituenciesGovernment expendituresOrders for return to written questionsQ-376Student summer employment2172004//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-377Mrs. Beaudin (Saint-Lambert) — What is the total funding allocated by the government to the Saint-Lambert riding, for each fiscal year from 2007-2008 up to and including the current fiscal year, and, in each case, what was the specific department or agency, project, amount and date involved? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-377.8555-403-377 Funding allocated to Saint-LambertBeaudin, JoséeBloc Québécois CaucusConstituenciesGovernment expendituresOrders for return to written questionsQ-377Saint-Lambert2172005//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-378Mrs. Beaudin (Saint-Lambert) — What is the total funding allocated by the government to the constituency of Saint-Lambert through the Economic Action Plan since its inception, up to and including the current fiscal year, and in each case, what was the specific department or agency, project and amount involved? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-378.8555-403-378 Economic Action Plan in Saint-LambertBeaudin, JoséeBloc Québécois CaucusCanada's Economic Action PlanConstituenciesGovernment expendituresOrders for return to written questionsQ-378Saint-Lambert2172006//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-380Ms. Ratansi (Don Valley East) — With respect to transportation for Ministers and their staffs: (a) what is the total amount spent by each minister’s office on taxis from the 2005-2006 fiscal year up to and including the current fiscal year; (b) how many employees in each minister’s office have access to taxi vouchers; and (c) what is the overtime cost for each minister’s driver, from the 2005-2006 fiscal year up to and including the current fiscal year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-380.8555-403-380 Transportation for ministers and their staffsCabinet ministersCabinet ministers' staffDriversGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsOvertimeQ-380Ratansi, YasminTaxisTransportation2172007//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-382Mr. Savage (Dartmouth—Cole Harbour) — With respect to the Enabling Accessibility Fund: (a) what is the current construction status of the Abilities Centre Durham and the North East Centre of Community Society, two projects announced in September 2008 in the amount of 15 million dollars; (b) when did the construction of the centres in (a) begin; (c) what is the construction or modification status of all projects approved from April 2008 to the present, including completion dates; (d) which projects included funding from provincial or municipal governments; and (e) what are the amounts provided by those provincial and municipal partners? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-382.8555-403-382 Enabling Accessibility FundBuilding and construction industryEnabling Accessibility FundGovernment expendituresInfrastructureLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-382Savage, Michael John2172008//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-388Mr. Savage (Dartmouth—Cole Harbour) — With regard to transportation costs for ministers and their exempt staff, since February 2006, broken down by month and year, what is the total cost incurred for ground transportation for all domestic and international travel, including, but not limited to, limousines, taxis or car service for the following ministerial portfolios: (a) Minister of State and Chief Government Whip; (b) Finance; (c) Transport, Infrastructure and Communities; (d) Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA); (e) Citizenship and Immigration; (f) President of the Queen's Privy Council for Canada and Minister for Intergovernmental Affairs; (g) National Revenue (Canada Revenue Agengy); (h) Human Resources and Skills Development; (i) Industry; (j) Canadian Heritage; (k) Environment; (l) Natural Resources; (m) Labour; (n) Fisheries and Oceans; (o) Minister of State (Sport); and (p) International Trade? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-388.8555-403-388 Transportation costs for ministers and their exempt staffCabinet ministersCabinet ministers' staffCostsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-388Savage, Michael JohnTransportationTravel2172009//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-390Mr. McCallum (Markham—Unionville) — With regard to the one-third of projects funded by the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund that will not be completed by the end of 2010, as indicated on page 66 of the government’s report entitled “Canada's Economic Action Plan — A Sixth Report to Canadians”, for each project : (a) what city was it in; (b) what is its description; (c) what was the total federal contribution; (d) what was the estimated cost of completing the project at the time of application; (e) what is the current estimate of the total cost of completing the project; (f) on what date was the project approved for funding by the government; (g) on what date was the project publicly announced; and (h) on what date was the contribution agreement for the project signed? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-390.8555-403-390 Infrastructure Stimulus FundCanada's Economic Action PlanGovernment expendituresInfrastructure Stimulus FundLiberal CaucusMcCallum, JohnOrders for return to written questionsPublic-private partnershipsQ-3902172010//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessTabling of DocumentsSessional Paper tabledPursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Document entitled "G-8 / G-20 Incremental Expenses by Department and Agency (as of October 28, 2010)". — Sessional Paper No. 8525-403-27.8525-403-27 G-8 / G-20 Incremental Expenses by Department and Agency (as of October 28, 2010)Conservative CaucusG-20 SummitG-8 SummitGovernment expendituresLukiwski, TomParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons2152140//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-384Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South) — With regard to security at the G8 and G20 summits: (a) when did the government solicit proposals for security services leading up to the summits; (b) what companies submitted proposals; (c) what companies were awarded contracts; (d) what security contracts were sole-sourced; and (e) what were the total security related expenditures for the G8 and G20 summits? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-384.8555-403-384 Security at the G8 and G20 summitsG-20 SummitG-8 SummitGovernment contractsGovernment expendituresInvitation to tenderLiberal CaucusMcGuinty, David J.Orders for return to written questionsQ-384SafetySecurity services2152164//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: Q-356Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — With regard to funding the government has awarded under Canada's Economic Action Plan since it was first introduced: (a) what is the total amount of funding the government has awarded in the riding of Vancouver Kingsway, detailing in each case the department or agency, the initiative and amount; and (b) what is the total amount of funding the government has awarded within the City of Vancouver, detailing in each case the department or agency, the initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-356.8555-403-356 Economic Action PlanCanada's Economic Action PlanConstituenciesDavies, DonGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-356VancouverVancouver Kingsway2141077//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-358Mr. Donnelly (New Westminster—Coquitlam) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2007-2008 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of New Westminster—Coquitlam, specifying each department or agency, initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-358.8555-403-358 Government spendingConstituenciesDonnelly, FinGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusNew Westminster—CoquitlamOrders for return to written questionsQ-3582141078//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-364Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — What is the total amount of government capital and operation funding, since fiscal year 2008-2009 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Trinity—Spadina, listing each department, agency, funding transfer to provincial and municipal governments and arm's length agency, such as Waterfront Toronto, detailing in each case the initiative and amount, including the date the funding was allocated? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-364.8555-403-364 Government spendingCapital investmentChow, OliviaConstituenciesGovernment expendituresInvestmentNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-364Trinity—Spadina2141080//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-367Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2008-2009 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing, specifying each department or agency, initiative and amount, including the date the funding was allocated? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-367.8555-403-367 Government spendingAlgoma—Manitoulin—KapuskasingConstituenciesGovernment expendituresHughes, CarolNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-3672141082//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the supplementary return to the following question made into an Order for Return: Q-258Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — With regard to the Economic Action Plan: (a) how has the government informed Canadians about the Economic Action Plan; (b) how much has the government spent on announcements relating to the Economic Action Plan; (c) what is the breakdown of these expenses by event and by type of expense; (d) how much has been spent on (i) consultants, (ii) flights, (iii) media and logistic companies, (iv) props and backdrops; (e) what are the names of companies contracted and the amount of funds spent for media consultants, logistics, props, and advertising; (f) what is the breakdown of this funding by city; (g) how much has the government spent producing advertisements; (h) when have these advertisements aired; and (i) what are the events and what are the total costs for each? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-258-01.8555-403-258 Economic Action Plan8555-403-258-01 Economic Action PlanBains, NavdeepCanada's Economic Action PlanGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-258Supplementary responses to written questions2137217//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-241Ms. Dhalla (Brampton—Springdale) — With regard to government spending on Google adWords since January 2006: (a) how much has each department spent; (b) what keywords were chosen; (c) what daily limits were set; (d) what was the cost of each keyword; and (e) how many clicks were made per keyword? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-241.8555-403-241 Government spendingDhalla, RubyGoogle AdWordsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-2412075716//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-242Ms. Dhalla (Brampton—Springdale) — With regard to government action on tuberculosis (TB) since January 2006: (a) what national and international programs are being operated by the government to combat the disease; (b) how much money has the government spent on those programs in each year since January 2006; (c) what is the rate of TB in Canada for each month since January 2006; (d) what is the mortality rate for TB in Canada for each year since January 2006; and (e) what research to combat the disease is being funded by the government? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-242.8555-403-242 TuberculosisDhalla, RubyGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMedical researchMortality ratesOrders for return to written questionsQ-242Tuberculosis in humans2075717//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-255Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — With regard to the Marquee Tourism Events Program, for each of the fiscal years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011: (a) what were the program criteria; (b) what are the names of the organizations that applied for funding; (c) what were the amounts applied for by each organization; (d) what were the decisions given for each application and the justification provided for each decision; (e) how much of the budgeted funds have not been allocated to projects; (f) how were the successful applications chosen; (g) what are the projected impacts on tourism in terms of the number of domestic and foreign visitors for the successful applications; (h) what are the projected economic benefits for the approved projects; and (i) what were the projected benefits for the applications that were not approved? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-255.8555-403-255 Marquee Tourism Events ProgramBains, NavdeepEventsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMarquee Tourism Events ProgramOrders for return to written questionsQ-255Tourism2075723//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-258Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — With regard to the Economic Action Plan: (a) how has the government informed Canadians about the Economic Action Plan; (b) how much has the government spent on announcements relating to the Economic Action Plan; (c) what is the breakdown of these expenses by event and by type of expense; (d) how much has been spent on (i) consultants, (ii) flights, (iii) media and logistic companies, (iv) props and backdrops; (e) what are the names of companies contracted and the amount of funds spent for media consultants, logistics, props, and advertising; (f) what is the breakdown of this funding by city; (g) how much has the government spent producing advertisements; (h) when have these advertisements aired; and (i) what are the events and what are the total costs for each? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-258.8555-403-258 Economic Action PlanBains, NavdeepCanada's Economic Action PlanGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-2582075725//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-268Mrs. Crombie (Mississauga—Streetsville) — With regard to government television and radio advertising during the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics: (a) how much money did the government spend on promoting Canada’s Economic Action Plan through television and radio commercials in Canada and the United States; (b) which television and radio stations aired commercials advertising Canada’s Economic Action Plan; (c) what were the exact dates and times of each television and radio advertising spot airing commercials of Canada’s Economic Action Plan; (d) what were the media costs of each advertisement; (e) what were the production costs of each advertisement; (f) which advertising firms were used for the creation and production of these advertisements; (g) which media buying agency was used; and (h) what rate of commission did each agency of record charge for the creation, production and media booking of each advertisement? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-268.8555-403-268 Government television and radio advertisingBroadcastingCanada's Economic Action PlanCrombie, BonnieGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOlympic Games winter 2010Orders for return to written questionsQ-268Radio broadcasting2075732//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-289Mr. Allen (Welland) — With regard to federal funds spent in the communities of Niagara on an annual basis dating back to 1993: (a) what is the amount, broken down by federal department, spent in the constituency of Welland annually between 2004 and 2010 inclusively; (b) what is the amount, broken down by federal department, spent in the former constituency of Erie-Lincoln annually between 1997 and 2004; and (c) what is the amount, broken down by federal department, spent in the former constituency of Erie annually between 1993 and 1997? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-289.8555-403-289 Government spendingAllen, MalcolmConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusNiagara regionOrders for return to written questionsQ-2892075747//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-290Ms. Leslie (Halifax) — What is the total amount of government funding for each fiscal year since 2007-2008, up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Halifax, specifying each department or agency, initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-290.8555-403-290 Government spendingConstituenciesGovernment expendituresHalifaxLeslie, Megan AnissaNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-2902075748//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-292Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — What is the total amount of government funding, for each fiscal year since 2007-2008, up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Sudbury, specifying each department or agency, initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-292.8555-403-292 Government spendingConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-292SudburyThibeault, Glenn2075749//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-293Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — What is the total amount of Economic Action Plan funding allocated for the fiscal year 2008-2009 within the constituency of Sudbury, specifying each department or agency, initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-293.8555-403-293 Economic Action PlanCanada's Economic Action PlanConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-293SudburyThibeault, Glenn2075750//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-300Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2008-2009 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Thunder Bay—Superior North, listing each department or agency, initiative and amount, including the date the funding was allocated? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-300.8555-403-300 Government spendingConstituenciesGovernment expendituresHyer, BruceNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-300Thunder Bay—Superior North2075755//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-304Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River) — With regard to all federal funding in the ridings of Nickel Belt and Thunder Bay—Rainy River for fiscal years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010: (a) how many projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; (b) what projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; and (c) what was the value of the projects which received funding from a department or agency over this period? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-304.8555-403-304 Federal fundingConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusNickel BeltOrders for return to written questionsQ-304Rafferty, JohnThunder Bay—Rainy River2075759//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-313Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — What is the total amount of funding the government has awarded in the riding of Acadie—Bathurst under Canada's Economic Action Plan since it was first introduced, detailing in each case the department or agency, the initiative and the amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-313.8555-403-313 Economic Action PlanAcadie—BathurstCanada's Economic Action PlanConstituenciesGodin, YvonGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-3132075762//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-318Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River) — With regard to all federal funding in the riding of Nickel Belt for fiscal years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010: (a) how many projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; (b) what projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; and (c) what was the value of the projects which received funding from a department or agency over this period? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-318.8555-403-318 Government spendingConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusNickel BeltOrders for return to written questionsQ-318Rafferty, John2075766//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-320Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River) — With regard to all federal funding in the riding of Kenora for fiscal years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010: (a) how many projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; (b) what projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; and (c) what was the value of the projects which received funding from a department or agency over this period? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-320.8555-403-320 Government spendingConstituenciesGovernment expendituresKenoraNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-320Rafferty, John2075768//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-321Mr. Atamanenko (British Columbia Southern Interior) — With respect to the government’s involvement in Recombinant DNA (rDNA) technology in each of the years from 1996 to 2010: (a) how much federal funding, from all sources, has the government spent on (i) research and development in the agricultural sector, (ii) research and development in the forestry sector, (iii) marketing and international or domestic promotion of rDNA technology in agriculture, (iv) marketing and international or domestic promotion of rDNA technology in forestry; (b) what percentage of funding has been allocated to conduct risk assessments on (i) human health impacts, (ii) ecosystem impacts and other consequences for flora and fauna, (iii) socio-economic factors associated with the introduction and use of rDNA technology; and (c) what public opinion polling has the government commissioned to enquire about public attitudes regarding the use of rDNA technology to genetically engineer food, seeds, trees, fish and animals and what were the results of each poll? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-321.8555-403-321 Recombinant DNAAtamanenko, AlexGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-321Recombinant DNAResearch and researchers2075769//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-324Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — With respect to Canada's Economic Action Plan: (a) under the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund in the riding of London—Fanshawe, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (b) under the Building Canada Fund - Communities Component in the riding of London—Fanshawe, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (c) under the Building Canada Fund - Communities Component top-up in the riding of London—Fanshawe, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (d) under the Building Canada Fund - Major Infrastructure Component in the riding of London—Fanshawe, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; (e) under the Recreational Infrastructure program in the riding of London—Fanshawe, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved; and (f) under the Green Infrastructure Fund in the riding of London—Fanshawe, (i) what applications for projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) who are the partners involved, (iii) what is the federal contribution, (iv) what is each partner's contribution, (v) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vi) what were the criteria used to determine which projects were approved? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-324.8555-403-324 Economic Action PlanBuilding Canada FundCanada's Economic Action PlanConstituenciesGovernment expendituresGreen Infrastructure FundInfrastructure Stimulus FundLondon—FanshaweMathyssen, IreneNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-324Recreational Infrastructure Canada2075772//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-325Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — With regard to all federal funding in the riding of London—Fanshawe for fiscal years 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009 and 2009-2010: (a) how many projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; (b) what projects received funding from a department or agency over this period; and (c) what was the value of the projects which received funding from a department or agency over this period? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-325.8555-403-325 Government spendingConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLondon—FanshaweMathyssen, IreneNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsProgramsQ-3252075774//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-328Mrs. Mendes (Brossard—La Prairie) — With respect to the $110 million announced on May 26, 2010, by the Minister of State for Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec in support measures for 2010-2011 to address the challenges facing the forest industry: (a) as of June 9, 2010, has any of this funding been awarded in the province of Quebec, (i) if yes, what are the details of the funding awarded, including the timeline and the recipients, (ii) if no, what are the details of all applications that have been received to date requesting funding from this program; (b) what are the eligibility requirements for this fund; (c) what are the criteria that would affect a funding application; and (d) what are the complete details of the program funding? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-328.8555-403-328 Forestry industry in QuebecEconomic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of QuebecForest products industryGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMendès, AlexandraOrders for return to written questionsProvince of QuebecQ-3282075775//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-332Mrs. Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine) — With respect to funding from Status of Women Canada: (a) what organizations have applied for funding since January 23, 2006; (b) how much money has been allocated to each organization since this date; and (c) for each organization that was refused funding, what were the reasons for the refusal of funding? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-332.8555-403-332 Funding from Status of Women CanadaAssociations, institutions and organizationsGovernment assistanceGovernment expendituresJennings, MarleneLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-332Status of Women Canada2075776//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-335Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Hamilton Centre, listing each department or agency, initiative and amount, including the date the funding was allocated? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-335.8555-403-335 Government spendingChristopherson, DavidConstituenciesGovernment expendituresHamilton CentreNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-3352075779//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-336Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Outremont, listing each department or agency, initiative and amount, including the date the funding was allocated? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-336.8555-403-336 Government spendingConstituenciesGovernment expendituresMulcair, Thomas J.New Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsOutremontQ-3362075780//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-339Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — How much funding in total has the government allocated to the riding of Acadie—Bathurst through the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency since 2006, detailing in each case the initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-339.8555-403-339 Atlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyAcadie—BathurstAtlantic Canada Opportunities AgencyConstituenciesGodin, YvonGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-3392075781//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-351Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — With regard to expenditures for the G20 and G8 summits, what are the details of all expenditures related to the summits but not accounted for in either the 2010-2011 Main or Supplementary Estimates, providing for each expenditure (i) the value of the expenditure, (ii) the goods or services consumed, (iii) the department under which the expenditure is accounted for, (iv) whether or not the contract was tendered through an open bidding process if the goods or services were purchased from an outside source? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-351.8555-403-351 G8 and G20 expendituresG-20 SummitG-8 SummitGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMcTeague, DanOrders for return to written questionsQ-3512075789//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-352Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — With regard to all government announcements pertaining to the North, made by any department between January 2006 and the present: (a) when was each announcement made; and (b) what is the status of each announcement as concerns, (i) implementation, (ii) policy change and status of the policy, (iii) the budget set aside for the implementation and the actual expenditure on the program implementation, (iv) procurement of materials for announced programs, (v) status of planning for implementation and program delivery, (vi) relevant budget business plans, (vii) projected completion dates for announced programs, (viii) benefits of the program for Northern residents, (ix) consultations with Northern residents and territorial governments, (x) the reasons why completion targets have not been met or start up dates have been delayed? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-352.8555-403-352 Government announcements pertaining to the NorthBagnell, LarryGovernment expendituresGovernment programsLiberal CaucusNorthern CanadaOrders for return to written questionsQ-352Regional development2075790//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the return to the following question made into an Order for Return: Q-223Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — What is the total amount of government funding, for each fiscal year since 2004-2005, up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Timmins—James Bay, specifying each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-223.8555-403-223 Government funding within the constituency of Timmins—James BayAngus, CharlieConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-223Timmins—James Bay2042512//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-224Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With respect to the budget of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada for each of the past ten fiscal years, up to and including this one: (a) what was the overall budget for Indian and Northern Affairs; (b) what amount was spent on or budgeted for salaries; (c) what amount was spent on or budgeted for non-salary expenditures; and (d) what was the difference between money budgeted and money spent? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-224.8555-403-224 Indian and Northern Affairs CanadaAngus, CharlieBudgetDepartment of Indian Affairs and Northern DevelopmentGovernment expendituresIncome and wagesNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-2242024673//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-214Ms. Murray (Vancouver Quadra) — With respect to the Vancouver 2010 Olympic and Paralympic Games: (a) for each fiscal year since 2005-2006, how much money has the federal government allocated to the Games, to which entities, on which dates, for what purposes, and what is the total amount; (b) how much money in total was spent on the Canada Pavilion; (c) which companies were invited to bid on the Canada Pavilion; (d) what is the cost breakdown of the Canada Pavilion with respect to construction, hospitality, wages, security and other categories of costs; (e) who adjudicated the bids related to Canada Pavilion contract proposals and on what criteria was the adjudication based; (f) what requests for proposals, including MERX codes, did the government put forward related to the Games; (g) in total, how much money was allocated for promoting bilingualism and French translation, on what dates were these funds distributed, to which entities and for what purposes; (h) what was the government’s plan to address the H1N1 influenza pandemic before and during the Games, how much money was allocated for this plan, to which entities was it allocated and for what purpose; (i) what was the government’s plan to address human and sex trafficking during the Games, how much was spent on this plan, which entities received funds, on which dates and for what purposes; (j) how much money did the government spend on including aboriginal communities in the Games and for what initiatives; (k) how much money was allocated from Sport Canada for the Games, on which dates and for what purposes; and (l) what costs, including hospitality, accommodation, travel and other categories of costs, were incurred by the federal government to support the participation of the Prime Minister and other Ministers at the Games, how many staff members were sent from the Prime Minister’s Office, how many rooms did the Prime Minister, Ministers and their staff require, at what cost, at which hotels and for what dates? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-214.8555-403-214 2010 Olympic and Paralympic GamesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMurray, JoyceOlympic Games winter 2010Orders for return to written questionsParalympic Games winter 2010Q-214Vancouver2022027//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: Q-162Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — With regard to the 2010 Olympic Games held in Vancouver from February 12 to 26: (a) what was the total financial and in kind cost of the Olympic Games to the federal government; (b) what did these costs cover (e.g., security and other); (c) what costs and amounts did the federal government commit to prior to the event compared to the final total cost; and (d) will there be a financial audit of these costs? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-162.8555-403-162 2010 Vancouver Olympic GamesDavies, LibbyGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOlympic Games winter 2010Orders for return to written questionsQ-162Vancouver2010710//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25508MarkHollandMark-HollandAjax—PickeringLiberal CaucusOntario//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/44/HollandMark_Lib.jpgBusiness of SupplyStart ConsiderationThe Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.Mr. Holland (Ajax—Pickering), seconded by Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor), moved, — That, in the opinion of the House, while Canadians are justifiably proud of Canada’s upcoming hosting of the G-8 and G-20 summits and determined to provide effective and efficient security for the visiting world leaders, they are outraged at the reckless partisan choices and financial mismanagement that have caused the security budget for the summits to skyrocket to over $1 billion which is more than six times the original budget and more than was spent on security for the 2010 Winter Olympics which lasted for 17 days and therefore the House calls on the government to provide a detailed breakdown to Canadians of how the money earmarked for security is being spent and an explanation of how the security budget was permitted to spiral out of control.Debate arose thereon.Financial managementG-20 SummitG-8 SummitGovernment expendituresHolland, MarkLiberal CaucusOpposition motionsSafety200185120018522001853-Business of SupplyResume ConsiderationThe House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Holland (Ajax—Pickering), seconded by Mr. Simms (Bonavista—Gander—Grand Falls—Windsor), in relation to the Business of Supply.The debate continued.Financial managementG-20 SummitG-8 SummitGovernment expendituresHolland, MarkLiberal CaucusOpposition motionsSafety20018562001857-Business of SupplyDecision MadeThe question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 52 -- Vote no 52)YEAS: 139, NAYS: 136YEAS -- POURAllen (Welland)AndréAndrewsAngusAshtonAsselinAtamanenkoBagnellBainsBélangerBellavanceBennettBevilacquaBevingtonBigrasBlaisBonsantBouchardBrisonBrunelleByrneCannisCardinCarrierCharltonChowChristophersonCoadyComartinCotlerCrombieCrowderCullenCuznerD'AmoursDavies (Vancouver East)DeBellefeuilleDemersDeschampsDesnoyersDhaliwalDhallaDionDonnellyDorionDosanjhDrydenDuceppeDufourDuncan (Etobicoke North)Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)EasterEykingFailleFolcoFooteGagnonGarneauGodinGoodaleGravelleGuarnieriGuayGuimond (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques)Guimond (Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord)Hall FindlayHollandHughesHyerIgnatieffJenningsJulianKaniaKarygiannisKennedyLaforestLaframboiseLalondeLavalléeLaytonLeeLemayLeslieLessardLévesqueMacAulayMalhiMaloMalowayMarstonMartin (Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca)Martin (Winnipeg Centre)Martin (Sault Ste. Marie)MasseMcCallumMcGuintyMcKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)MénardMendesMinnaMouraniMulcairMurphy (Charlottetown)MurrayNadeauNevilleOliphantOuelletPacettiPaillé (Hochelaga)PaquettePatryPearsonPlamondonPomerleauProulxRaffertyRatansiReganRodriguezRotaRussellSavageSavoieScarpaleggiaSgroSiksaySilvaSimmsSimsonSt-CyrStofferSzaboThibeaultTonksValerioteVincentWrzesnewskyjZarac -- 139NAYS -- CONTREAblonczyAglukkaqAlbrechtAllen (Tobique—Mactaquac)AllisonAmbroseAndersAndersonArmstrongArthurAshfieldBairdBenoitBernierBezanBlackburnBlaneyBoucherBoughenBraidBreitkreuzBrown (Leeds—Grenville)Brown (Newmarket—Aurora)Brown (Barrie)BruinoogeCadmanCalandraCalkinsCannan (Kelowna—Lake Country)Cannon (Pontiac)CarrieCassonChongClementCumminsDavidsonDayDel MastroDevolinDreeshenDuncan (Vancouver Island North)DykstraFastFinleyFlahertyFletcherGalipeauGénéreuxGloverGoldringGoodyearGourdeGrewalGuergisHarris (Cariboo—Prince George)HiebertHillHobackHoeppnerHolderJeanKamp (Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission)Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's)Kenney (Calgary Southeast)KentKerrKomarnickiKramp (Prince Edward—Hastings)LakeLauzonLebelLemieuxLobbLukiwskiLunnLunneyMacKay (Central Nova)MacKenzieMarkMayesMcColemanMcLeodMenziesMerrifieldMillerMoore (Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam)Moore (Fundy Royal)NicholsonNorlockO'ConnorO'Neill-GordonOdaParadisPaynePetitPoilievrePrenticePrestonRaittRajotteRathgeberReidRichardsRichardsonRickfordRitzSaxtonScheerSchellenbergerSheaShipleyShorySmithSorensonStantonStorsethStrahlSweetThompsonTilsonTrostTweedUppalVan KesterenVellacottVernerWallaceWarawaWarkentinWatsonWeston (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country)Weston (Saint John)WongWoodworthYelichYoung -- 136PAIRED -- PAIRÉSAbbottBachandBeaudinBlockBourgeoisClementDechertFlahertyFreemanGaudetHawnPaillé (Louis-Hébert)RoySorensonThi LacToewsDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 52Financial managementG-20 SummitG-8 SummitGovernment expendituresHolland, MarkLiberal CaucusOpposition motionsRecorded divisionsSafety2001859//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-194Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — With respect to government spending or contracts with Harbour 60 Steakhouse in Toronto by each department, agency, and crown corporation for the last ten years: (a) which have spent funds; (b) what were the amount of funds spent; (c) when were those funds spent; (d) who authorized payments; (e) which events included the use of funds for alcohol; (f) which events were linked to private business; and (g) which events were attended by lobbyists? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-194.8555-403-194 Harbour 60 SteakhouseChow, OliviaGovernment contractsGovernment expendituresHarbour Sixty SteakhouseLobbying and lobbyistsNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-194RestaurantsToronto1993624//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-177Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — With regard to nanotechnology: (a) what are the total federal funds spent and committed for expenditure, for each of the fiscal years from 2005-2006 through 2008-2009 inclusive, broken down by department and criterion; (b) who are the recipients of these funds; (c) to what purpose was funding for nanotechnology used by institutions and departments, including the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Natural Resources Canada, Industry Canada, and the National Research Council of Canada; (d) what were the amounts allocated to test health, safety, and environmental impacts of nanoproducts and nanomaterials; (e) what is the list of nanomaterials currently in the market; (f) which of these have been extensively tested to determine possible effects on human and environmental health and safety and, of those tested, which, if any, raised concern or required mitigation or prevention; (g) how many assessments on nanomaterial notification packages have been submitted to the New Substances Notification Program to date and (i) of these notification packages, have there been any nanomaterials rejected for entry into Canada, (ii) have there been any conditions of use placed based on assessment results and, if so, how many; (h) did the government ever request notifiers (companies or individuals) providing nanomaterial notification packages to submit additional toxicity data above and beyond what is requested in the schedules of the New Substances Notification Regulations and, if so, did this result in refusal of entry into the Canadian market or justify use of material with conditions; and (i) what information, notifications or advisories have been issued to ensure the safe discovery, production, manufacturing, use and disposal of nanomaterials and nano-enabled products, (i) when, (ii) by which departments? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-177.8555-403-177 NanotechnologyFederal institutionsGovernment expendituresJulian, PeterNanotechnologyNew Democratic Party CaucusNew Substances Notification ProgramOrders for return to written questionsQ-1771990573//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-192Ms. Chow (Trinity—Spadina) — With respect to the 2010 G20 summit: (a) what is the expected cost of the summit to the federal government; (b) what financial analyses or studies have been done on the impact the summit will have on small businesses; (c) what compensation will be provided to small businesses and tourism event organizers for costs directly related to the summit; (d) what compensation will be provided to the City of Toronto for costs directly related to the summit; (e) what were the costs incurred in the past by Canadian host cities of similar summits; (f) what compensation has been provided by the federal government in the past to host cities of similar summits; and (g) will the federal government post bonds up front to cover costs incurred as a direct result of the summit to (i) the City of Toronto, (ii) small businesses, (iii) tourism event organizers? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-192.8555-403-192 G20 summitChow, OliviaG-20 SummitGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-192Toronto1990579//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-112Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — With regard to fees paid by the government: (a) how much does the government pay in merchant fees for accepting credit cards for government services, broken down by fee type and program area; (b) how much does the government pay in transaction fees for processing debit cards for government services, broken down by fee type and program area; (c) what are the details of agreements signed between the government and credit and debit card processing companies, including all terms, contracts and commitments; (d) what is the total cost of agreements signed between the government and credit and debit card processing companies; and (e) what does the government pay to banks in service fees, broken down by fee type and program area? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-112.8555-403-112 Fees paid by the governmentBains, NavdeepCredit cardsDebit cardsFeesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-1121899031//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-57Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel) — What is the total amount of government funding, allocated within the constituency of Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel in fiscal year 2006-2007, listing each department or agency, initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-57.8555-403-57 Government funding within the constituency of Saint-Léonard—Saint-MichelConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPacetti, MassimoQ-57Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel1881138//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-72Mr. Davies (Vancouver Kingsway) — What was the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 1998-1999 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Vancouver Kingsway, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount by fiscal year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-72.8555-403-72 Government spending in the constituency of Vancouver KingswayConstituenciesDavies, DonGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-72Vancouver Kingsway1881144//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-58Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel) — What is the total amount of government funding, allocated within the constituency of Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel in fiscal year 2007-2008, listing each department or agency, initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-58.8555-403-58 Government funding within the constituency of Saint-Léonard—Saint-MichelConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPacetti, MassimoQ-58Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel1878314//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-59Mr. Pacetti (Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel) — What is the total amount of government funding, allocated within the constituency of Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel in fiscal year 2008-2009, listing each department or agency, initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-59.8555-403-59 Government funding within the constituency of Saint-Léonard—Saint-MichelConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPacetti, MassimoQ-59Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel1878315//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-8Mrs. Mendes (Brossard—La Prairie) — Within the constituency of Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean, what was the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, itemized according to (i) the date the money was received in the riding, (ii) the dollar amount of the expenditure, (iii) the program from which the funding came, (iv) the ministry responsible, (v) the designated recipient? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-8.8555-403-8 Government spending in the constituency of Roberval—Lac-Saint-JeanConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMendès, AlexandraOrders for return to written questionsQ-8Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean1875804-Daily Routine Of BusinessIntroduction of Private Members' BillsDecision MadePursuant to Standing Orders 68(2) and 69(1), on motion of Mrs. Beaudin (Saint-Lambert), seconded by Mr. Paillé (Hochelaga), Bill C-507, An Act to amend the Financial Administration Act (federal spending power), was introduced, read the first time, ordered to be printed and ordered for a second reading at the next sitting of the House.Beaudin, JoséeBloc Québécois CaucusC-507, An Act to amend the Financial Administration Act (federal spending power)Government expendituresIntroduction and First readingOpting out provisionPrivate Members' BillsProvince of QuebecProvincial jurisdiction1874341//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: Q-4Mr. D'Amours (Madawaska—Restigouche) — With regard to the Community Development Trust Fund, up until November 18, 2009: (a) what amount has been allocated to each Atlantic province; (b) which projects have benefited from this funding, by province; (c) how much have these projects received, by province; and (d) in which city and constituency are these projects being carried out? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-4.8555-403-4 Community Development Trust FundCommunity Development TrustD'Amours, Jean-ClaudeGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-41872038-Deferred Recorded DivisionsBusiness of SupplyDecision MadePursuant to Order made Monday, March 15, 2010, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Easter (Malpeque), seconded by Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre), — That, in the opinion of this House, the government should show leadership in reducing government waste by rolling-back its own expenditures on massive amounts of partisan, taxpayer-paid government advertising, ministerial use of government aircraft, the hiring of external “consultants”, and the size of the Cabinet, the Prime Minister’s Office and the Privy Council Office, which together could represent a saving to taxpayers of more than a billion dollars; and to show its own leadership in this regard, the House directs its Board of Internal Economy to take all necessary steps to end immediately the wasteful practice of Members sending mass mailings, known as “ten-percenters”, into ridings other than their own, which could represent another saving to taxpayers of more than $10 million.The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division: (Division No. 4 -- Vote no 4)YEAS: 140, NAYS: 137YEAS -- POURAllen (Welland)AndréAndrewsAngusAshtonAsselinAtamanenkoBachandBagnellBainsBeaudinBélangerBellavanceBennettBevilacquaBevingtonBigrasBlaisBonsantBouchardBourgeoisBrunelleByrneCardinCarrierCharltonChowChristophersonCoadyCoderreComartinCotlerCrombieCrowderCuznerD'AmoursDavies (Vancouver Kingsway)Davies (Vancouver East)DeBellefeuilleDeschampsDesnoyersDhaliwalDionDonnellyDorionDosanjhDrydenDuceppeDufourDuncan (Etobicoke North)Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona)EasterEykingFailleFolcoFooteFreemanFryGagnonGarneauGaudetGodinGravelleGuarnieriGuayGuimond (Rimouski-Neigette—Témiscouata—Les Basques)Guimond (Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord)Hall FindlayHarris (St. John's East)HollandHughesJenningsKaniaKarygiannisLaforestLaframboiseLalondeLavalléeLaytonLeBlancLeeLemayLessardLévesqueMacAulayMalhiMaloMalowayMarstonMartin (Winnipeg Centre)Martin (Sault Ste. Marie)MasseMathyssenMcCallumMcGuintyMcKay (Scarborough—Guildwood)McTeagueMénardMendesMinnaMouraniMulcairMurphy (Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe)NadeauNevilleOliphantOuelletPacettiPaillé (Hochelaga)Paillé (Louis-Hébert)PaquettePatryPearsonPlamondonPomerleauProulxRaffertyRatansiReganRotaRussellSavageSavoieScarpaleggiaSiksaySilvaSimmsSimsonSt-CyrStofferSzaboThibeaultTonksTrudeauValerioteVincentVolpeWilfertWrzesnewskyjZarac -- 140NAYS -- CONTREAbbottAblonczyAglukkaqAlbrechtAllen (Tobique—Mactaquac)AllisonAmbroseAndersAndersonArmstrongAshfieldBairdBernierBezanBlackburnBlaneyBlockBoucherBoughenBraidBreitkreuzBrown (Leeds—Grenville)Brown (Newmarket—Aurora)Brown (Barrie)BruinoogeCadmanCalandraCalkinsCannan (Kelowna—Lake Country)Cannon (Pontiac)CarrieCassonChongClarkeClementDavidsonDayDechertDel MastroDreeshenDuncan (Vancouver Island North)DykstraFastFinleyFletcherGalipeauGallantGénéreuxGloverGoldringGoodyearGourdeGrewalGuergisHarris (Cariboo—Prince George)HawnHiebertHillHobackHoeppnerHolderJeanKamp (Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge—Mission)Keddy (South Shore—St. Margaret's)Kenney (Calgary Southeast)KentKerrKomarnickiKramp (Prince Edward—Hastings)LakeLauzonLebelLemieuxLobbLukiwskiLunneyMacKay (Central Nova)MacKenzieMarkMayesMcColemanMcLeodMenziesMerrifieldMillerMoore (Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam)Moore (Fundy Royal)NicholsonNorlockO'ConnorO'Neill-GordonObhraiOdaParadisPaynePetitPoilievrePrenticePrestonRaittRajotteRathgeberReidRichardsRichardsonRickfordRitzSaxtonScheerSchellenbergerSheaShorySmithSorensonStantonStorsethStrahlSweetThompsonTilsonToewsTrostTweedUppalVan KesterenVellacottVernerWallaceWarawaWarkentinWatsonWeston (West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country)Weston (Saint John)WongWoodworthYelichYoung -- 137PAIRED -- PAIRÉSDemersFlahertyLunnRoyThi LacVan LoanDecisions of the HouseDivision No. 4Easter, WayneEconomic wasteGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresHouseholdersLiberal CaucusOpposition motionsRecorded divisions18118731811874//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/43WayneEasterHon.Wayne-EasterMalpequeLiberal CaucusPrince Edward Island//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/EasterWayne_Lib.jpgBusiness of SupplyStart ConsiderationThe Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.Mr. Easter (Malpeque), seconded by Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre), moved, — That, in the opinion of this House, the government should show leadership in reducing government waste by rolling-back its own expenditures on massive amounts of partisan, taxpayer-paid government advertising, ministerial use of government aircraft, the hiring of external “consultants”, and the size of the Cabinet, the Prime Minister’s Office and the Privy Council Office, which together could represent a saving to taxpayers of more than a billion dollars; and to show its own leadership in this regard, the House directs its Board of Internal Economy to take all necessary steps to end immediately the wasteful practice of Members sending mass mailings, known as “ten-percenters”, into ridings other than their own, which could represent another saving to taxpayers of more than $10 million.Debate arose thereon.Easter, WayneEconomic wasteGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresHouseholdersLiberal CaucusOpposition motions180953518095361809537-Daily Routine Of BusinessMotionsDecision MadeBy unanimous consent, it was ordered, — That, at the conclusion of today's debate on the opposition motion in the name of the Member from Malpeque, all questions necessary to dispose of the motion be deemed put and a recorded division deemed requested and deferred to Tuesday, March 16, 2010, at the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders.CabinetConsultantsDecisions of the HouseDeferred divisionsGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresHouseholdersMotionsOpposition motions1809542-Business of SupplyResume ConsiderationThe House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Easter (Malpeque), seconded by Ms. Neville (Winnipeg South Centre), in relation to the Business of Supply.The debate continued.Easter, WayneEconomic wasteGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresHouseholdersLiberal CaucusOpposition motions18095571809558-Business of SupplyRecorded division deferredPursuant to Order made earlier today, the question was deemed put on the motion and the recorded division was deemed requested and deferred until Tuesday, March 16, 2010, at the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders.Deferred divisionsEaster, WayneEconomic wasteGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresHouseholdersLiberal CaucusOpposition motions1809560//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-503Mr. Volpe (Eglinton—Lawrence) — Within the constituency of Eglinton—Lawrence, what was the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, itemized according to (i) the date the money was received in the riding, (ii) the dollar amount of the expenditure, (iii) the program from which the funding came, (iv) the ministry responsible, (v) the designated recipient? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-503.8555-402-503 Government spending in the constituency of Eglinton—LawrenceConstituenciesEglinton—LawrenceGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-503Volpe, Joseph1758264//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-538Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — With regard to funds allocated over the last four fiscal years, for each territory, by the National Research Council: (a) what is the breakdown of the amount allocated for (i) staffing purposes, (ii) administration, (iii) travel expenses, (iv) programs; (b) what is the breakdown of the staffing costs for (i) staff situated in each territory, (ii) staff situated outside the territory they provided a service for; (c) for each allocation, how much was actually spent per fiscal year; and (d) how many projects falling under the Industrial Research Assistance Program were approved and how many other projects were approved? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-538.8555-402-538 National Research Council fundsBagnell, LarryGovernment expendituresIndustrial Research Assistance ProgramLiberal CaucusNational Research Council of CanadaOrders for return to written questionsQ-5381716904//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-425Ms. Duncan (Etobicoke North) — With respect to the current pandemic of new influenza A (H1N1): (a) who is at the top of the pandemic organizational chart for the country; (b) what gaps still exist in the government’s overarching plan, recognizing that it is an ever-evolving plan, and by what date will identified gaps be addressed; (c) what money remains from the $400 million contained in the budget of 2006 as ‘to be set aside as a contingency to be accessed on an as-needed basis’; (d) what funds have been spent since the start of the pandemic in Canada to address response, specifically, (i) what government departments have tested their pandemic plan, (ii) what departments operationalized their plans or part of their plans in the spring, and updated their plans since the lessons learned from the spring; (e) should there be an election, what is the pandemic preparedness plan for Elections Canada, both to protect the health and well-being of its employees and Canadians; (f) what are the outstanding issues among medical personnel in terms of preparedness, and how are these issues being addressed; (g) what was the process for monitoring swine herds prior to April 24, 2009, and how has it increased since that date; (h) what is the purpose behind the absence of a Canadian notifiable swine influenza surveillance system; (i) what is known of the clinical spectrum of the disease at this time, and what are the possible long-term impacts on lungs, and other organs, and potential long-term costs to the healthcare system; (j) by what date are provincial and territorial vaccine distribution plans to be in place, what oversight exists to ensure they are in place, and will they be made public; (k) what contingency plans are being put in place should Canadian distributors run out of stock of N95 masks; (l) will there be a compensation package should there be challenges with the vaccine; (m) what recommendations are being made to those with chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and immunocompromised patients, and how is this information being relayed to these groups to see their doctor now; (n) what are the details of the “alternative strategies” being developed by provinces and territories; (o) what are the details of adding a “small amount of amantadine” to the National Emergency Stockpile System, and is its use in combination thought to be effective when the virus is resistant to amantadines; (p) are there any other alternative therapies being explored to address antiviral resistance and, if so, what funds are being allocated to the effort; (q) will 500 ventilators meet the potential intensive care unit (ICU) burden considering Canada’s ICU cases were around 20% of its hospitalized, compared to 15% in heavily impacted communities in the southern hemisphere; and (r) what do recent modelling studies show? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-425.8555-402-425 Pandemic influenzaDuncan, KirstyGovernment expendituresHealth emergenciesImmunizationInfluenza A(H1N1)Liberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPandemicQ-4251706149//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-432Mr. McTeague (Pickering—Scarborough East) — With regard to the government's Economic Action Plan, for each of the project announcements in the electoral district of Pickering—Scarborough East: (a) what was (i) the date of the announcement, (ii) the amount of stimulus spending announced, (iii) the department which announced it; and (b) was there a public event associated with the annoucement and, if so, what was the cost of that event? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-432.8555-402-432 Economic Action PlanCanada's Economic Action PlanGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMcTeague, DanOrders for return to written questionsPickering—Scarborough EastQ-4321706152//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-436Mr. Andrews (Avalon) — What is the total amount of government funding, allocated within the constituency of Avalon in fiscal year 2007-2008 up to and including the current fiscal year, listing each department or agency, initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-436.8555-402-436 Government funding within the constituency of AvalonAndrews, ScottAvalonGovernment expendituresGovernment programsLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-4361706155//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-440Mrs. Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine) — With regard to the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade: (a) how much money has the department spent for each of the last ten fiscal years, including the current one, in pursuing free trade agreements between Canada and foreign entities organized as (i) a dollar figure by the country or multilateral organization with which the free trade agreement was being negotiated, (ii) a percentage of the department’s total operating budget organized by the country or multilateral organization with which the free trade agreement was being negotiated; and (b) how much money has the department spent for each of the last ten fiscal years, including the current one, on consular affairs organized as (i) a dollar figure by diplomatic or consular mission, (ii) a percentage of the department’s total budget organized by diplomatic or consular mission? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-440.8555-402-440 Department of Foreign Affairs and International TradeDepartment of Foreign Affairs, Trade and DevelopmentEmbassies and consulatesGovernment expendituresJennings, MarleneLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-4401706158//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-441Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With regard to housing promises made by the government: (a) of the $1.9 billion investment promised in September 2008 to extend housing and homelessness programs for low-income Canadians, (i) how much has been spent, (ii) what programs has the money funded, (iii) what is the breakdown of this spending by province; (b) of the $1 billion promised for social housing renovations and energy retrofits in the 2009 budget, (i) how much has been spent, (ii) what programs has the money funded, (iii) what is the breakdown of this spending by province; (c) of the $400 million promised for the construction of housing units for low-income seniors in the 2009 budget, (i) how much has been spent, (ii) what programs has the money funded, (iii) what is the breakdown of this spending by province; and (d) of the $75 million for the construction of housing units for persons with disabilities promised in the 2009 budget, (i) how much has been spent, (ii) what programs has the money funded, (iii) what is the breakdown of this spending by province? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-441.8555-402-441 Housing promisesGovernment expendituresGovernment programsHousingLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-441Simson, MichelleSocial housing1706159//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-442Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With respect to federal spending on advertising to promote the Economic Action Plan and the Home Renovation Tax Credit, what has been the total federal spending from April 1 to September 30, 2009, itemized according to (i) type of advertising, (ii) production costs for each ad, (iii) media outlets used to air or publish each ad, (iv) coverage area of each media outlet, (v) broadcast cost for each ad, (vi) total for advertising cost per month? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-442.8555-402-442 Spending on advertisingCanada's Economic Action PlanGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresHome renovation tax creditLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-442Simson, Michelle1706160//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-443Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With respect to the use of taxis within the National Capital Region: (a) what has been the total amount spent for each fiscal year, from 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year for each department; (b) how many employees at each department have access to taxi vouchers; and (c) what is the cost of Environment Canada’s Envirobus program for each fiscal year from 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-443.8555-402-443 TaxisFederal institutionsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusNational Capital RegionOrders for return to written questionsQ-443Simson, MichelleTaxis1706161//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-444Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With regard to the Preparing for Emergencies announcement made during the 2006 budget: (a) how much of the $1 billion over five years has been spent to improve Canada’s pandemic preparedness; (b) what departments and agencies received money and how much money have they received; and (c) has any of the $400 million slated to be set aside as a contingency been spent and, if so, on what has the contingency money been spent? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-444.8555-402-444 Emergency preparednessContingency reserveEmergency preparednessFederal institutionsGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-444Simson, Michelle1706162//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into an Orders for Return: Q-416Mr. McGuinty (Ottawa South) — What is the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 1998-1999 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Ottawa South, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-416.8555-402-416 Government spending within the constituency of Ottawa SouthConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMcGuinty, David J.Orders for return to written questionsOttawa SouthQ-4161667686//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: Q-402Mr. Kania (Brampton West) — With respect to government spending in the constituency of Brampton West, what was the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, itemized according to: (a) the date the money was requested in the riding; (b) the dollar amount requested; (c) the dollar amount received; (d) the program from which the funding came; (e) the department responsible; and (f) the designated recipient? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-402.8555-402-402 Government spending within the constituency of Brampton WestBrampton WestConstituenciesGovernment expendituresKania, AndrewLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-4021635287//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the return to the following question made into an Order for Return: Q-277Ms. Sgro (York West) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 1998-1999 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of York West, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-277.8555-402-277 Government spending within the constituency of York WestConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-277Sgro, Judy A.York West1618959//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25513EdKomarnickiEd-KomarnickiSouris—Moose MountainConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/41/KomarnickiEd_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Komarnicki (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development and to the Minister of Labour) presented the return to the following question made into an Order for Return: Q-171Mr. Christopherson (Hamilton Centre) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Hamilton Centre, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-171.8555-402-171 Government spending in the constituency of Hamilton CentreChristopherson, DavidConstituenciesGovernment expendituresHamilton CentreNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-1711611815//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-183Mr. Comartin (Windsor—Tecumseh) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Windsor—Tecumseh, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-183.8555-402-183 Government spending in the constituency of Windsor—TecumsehComartin, JoeConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-183Windsor—Tecumseh1610194//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the return to the following question made into an Order for Return: Q-231Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Skeena—Bulkley Valley, listing each department or agency, initiative and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-231.8555-402-231 Government spending in the constituency of Skeena—Bulkley ValleyConstituenciesCullen, NathanGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-231Skeena—Bulkley Valley1605145//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the return to the following question made into an Order for Return: Q-177Mr. Allen (Welland) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Welland, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-177.8555-402-177 Government spending in the constituency of WellandAllen, MalcolmConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-177Welland1605217//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: Q-173Mr. Martin (Sault Ste. Marie) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Sault Ste. Marie, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-173.8555-402-173 Government spending in the constituency of Sault Ste. MarieConstituenciesGovernment expendituresMartin, TonyNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-173Sault Ste. Marie1591921//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-175Mr. Hyer (Thunder Bay—Superior North) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Thunder Bay—Superior North, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-175.8555-402-175 Government spending in the constituency of Thunder Bay—Superior NorthConstituenciesGovernment expendituresHyer, BruceNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-175Thunder Bay—Superior North1591922//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-176Ms. Leslie (Halifax) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Halifax, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-176.8555-402-176 Government spending in the constituency of HalifaxConstituenciesGovernment expendituresHalifaxLeslie, Megan AnissaNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-1761591923//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-179Mr. Maloway (Elmwood—Transcona) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Elmwood—Transcona, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-179.8555-402-179 Government spending in the constituency of Elmwood—TransconaConstituenciesElmwood—TransconaGovernment expendituresMaloway, JimNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-1791591925//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-181Mr. Siksay (Burnaby—Douglas) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Burnaby—Douglas, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-181.8555-402-181 Government spending in the constituency of Burnaby—DouglasBurnaby—DouglasConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-181Siksay, Bill1591926//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-184Mr. Layton (Toronto—Danforth) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Toronto—Danforth, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-184.8555-402-184 Government spending in the constituency of Toronto—DanforthConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLayton, JackNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-184Toronto—Danforth1591927//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-187Mr. Marston (Hamilton East—Stoney Creek) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-187.8555-402-187 Government spending in the constituency of Hamilton East—Stoney CreekConstituenciesGovernment expendituresHamilton East—Stoney CreekMarston, WayneNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-1871591929//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-188Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — What is the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Acadie—Bathurst, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-188.8555-402-188 Government spending in the constituency of Acadie—BathurstAcadie—BathurstConstituenciesGodin, YvonGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-1881591930//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-189Mr. Godin (Acadie—Bathurst) — With respect to federal investments in infrastructure in New Brunswick since 1999: (a) what is the detailed breakdown of the funding allocated for rebuilding roads in New Brunswick; and (b) what is the detailed breakdown of the funding allocated for airport infrastructures? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-189.8555-402-189 Infrastructure in New BrunswickAirportsGodin, YvonGovernment expendituresNew BrunswickNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-189Roads and road transportationTransportation infrastructure1591931//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-192Ms. Mathyssen (London—Fanshawe) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of London—Fanshawe, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-192.8555-402-192 Government spending in the constituency of London—FanshaweConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLondon—FanshaweMathyssen, IreneNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-1921591933//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-198Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Thunder Bay—Rainy River, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-198.8555-402-198 Government spending in the constituency of Thunder Bay—Rainy RiverConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-198Rafferty, JohnThunder Bay—Rainy River1591938//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-200Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Sudbury, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-200.8555-402-200 Government spending in the constituency of SudburyConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-200SudburyThibeault, Glenn1591940//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-201Mr. Thibeault (Sudbury) — With respect to the redecorating and renovations of Ministers’ parliamentary and departmental offices in the National Capital Region for the last five years: (a) what amount has each department spent on such improvements, on an annual basis; (b) on which date was each project approved and completed; (c) what was the nature of the renovations undertaken in each instance; (d) what is the normal approval process for such work; (e) which projects were undertaken at the demand of a Minister or their political exempt staff; (f) when were they undertaken and at what cost; (g) how much has been spent on buying or renting art work for each Ministers’ office, on an annual basis; (h) what art work was purchased, when, and for how much; (i) how much has been spent on flowers or plants for each Minister’s office, on an annual basis; (j) how much has been spent on new furniture for each Minister’s office, on an annual basis; (k) what furniture was purchased, when, and for how much; (l) how much has each Minister spent on purchasing new technology for their office, on an annual basis; and (m) what new technology items were purchased, when, and for how much? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-201.8555-402-201 Improvements to ministers' officesCabinet ministersGovernment expendituresMembers' parliamentary officesNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsParliament HillQ-201Thibeault, Glenn1591941//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-206Mr. Allen (Welland) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of British Columbia Southern Interior, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-206.8555-402-206 Government spending in the constituency of British Columbia Southern InteriorAllen, MalcolmBritish Columbia Southern InteriorConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-2061591944//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-211Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona) — What is the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 1998-1999 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituencies of Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, Edmonton Centre, Edmonton East, Edmonton—Leduc, Edmonton—St. Albert, Edmonton—Sherwood Park, Edmonton—Spruce Grove, and Edmonton—Strathcona, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-211.8555-402-211 Government spending in the constituencies of Edmonton—Mill Woods—Beaumont, Edmonton Centre, Edmonton East, Edmonton—Leduc, Edmonton—St. Albert, Edmonton—Sherwood Park, Edmonton—Spruce Grove, and Edmonton—StrathconaConstituenciesDuncan, LindaEdmonton CentreEdmonton EastEdmonton—LeducEdmonton—Mill Woods—BeaumontEdmonton—Sherwood ParkEdmonton—Spruce GroveEdmonton—St. AlbertEdmonton—StrathconaGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-2111591948//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-217Ms. Ashton (Churchill) — What is the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Churchill, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-217.8555-402-217 Government spending in the constituency of ChurchillAshton, NikiChurchillConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-2171591952//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-219Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — What is the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2006-2007 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Vancouver East, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-219.8555-402-219 Government spending in the constituency of Vancouver EastConstituenciesDavies, LibbyGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-219Vancouver East1591954//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-223Ms. Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North) — What is the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 1998-1999 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Winnipeg North, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-223.8555-402-223 Government spending in the constituency of Winnipeg NorthConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-223Wasylycia-Leis, JudyWinnipeg North1591957//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-224Mrs. Simson (Scarborough Southwest) — With respect to federal spending in the constituency of Scarborough Southwest, what was the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, itemized according to: (a) the date the money was received in the riding; (b) the dollar amount of the expenditure; (c) the program from which the funding came; (d) the ministry responsible; and (e) the designated recipient? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-224.8555-402-224 Federal spending in the constituency of Scarborough SouthwestConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-224Scarborough SouthwestSimson, Michelle1591958//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-236Mrs. Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine) — What is the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 1998-1999 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-236.8555-402-236 Government spending in the constituency of Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—LachineConstituenciesGovernment expendituresJennings, MarleneLiberal CaucusNotre-Dame-de-Grâce—LachineOrders for return to written questionsQ-2361591965//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-245Mr. Rota (Nipissing—Timiskaming) — With respect to federal spending in the constituency of Nipissing—Timiskaming, what was the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, itemized according to: (a) the date the money was received in the riding; (b) the dollar amount of the expenditure; (c) the program from which the funding came; (d) the ministry responsible; and (e) the designated recipient? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-245.8555-402-245 Federal spending in the constituency of Nipissing—TimiskamingConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusNipissing—TimiskamingOrders for return to written questionsQ-245Rota, Anthony1591972//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-249Ms. Ratansi (Don Valley East) — What is the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Don Valley East, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-249.8555-402-249 Government spending in the constituency of Don Valley EastConstituenciesDon Valley EastGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-249Ratansi, Yasmin1591975//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-254Mr. Oliphant (Don Valley West) — What is the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2006-2007 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Don Valley West, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-254.8555-402-254 Government spending in the constituency of Don Valley WestConstituenciesDon Valley WestGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusOliphant, RobertOrders for return to written questionsQ-2541591979//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-264Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the City of Hamilton, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-264.8555-402-264 Government funding in the City of HamiltonCharlton, ChrisGovernment expendituresHamiltonNew Democratic Party CaucusOntarioOrders for return to written questionsQ-2641591986//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-265Ms. Charlton (Hamilton Mountain) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Hamilton Mountain, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-265.8555-402-265 Government spending within the constituency of Hamilton MountainCharlton, ChrisConstituenciesGovernment expendituresHamilton MountainNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-2651591987//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-267Mr. Masse (Windsor West) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Windsor West, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-267.8555-402-267 Government spending within the constituency of Windsor WestConstituenciesGovernment expendituresMasse, BrianNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-267Windsor West1591988//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-274Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Timmins—James Bay, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-274.8555-402-274 Government spending within the constituency of Timmins—James BayAngus, CharlieConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-274Timmins—James Bay1591993//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-284Mr. Harris (St. John's East) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of St. John's East, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-284.8555-402-284 Government spending within the constituency of St. John's EastConstituenciesGovernment expendituresHarris, JackNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-284St. John's East1592000//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-285Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — With respect to government expenditures since fiscal year 2004-2005: (a) what is the total amount of government funding from that time up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Burnaby—New Westminster; (b) which departments or agencies spent money within the constituency; (c) on what initiatives did each department or agency spend these funds; and (d) what was the amount of spending within the riding for each department or agency and each initiative? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-285.8555-402-285 Government spending within the constituency of Burnaby—New WestminsterBurnaby—New WestminsterConstituenciesGovernment expendituresJulian, PeterNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-2851592001//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-292Ms. Davies (Vancouver East) — With regards to former President Bush’s visit to Calgary, Alberta on March 17, 2009, and former Presidents Bush and Clinton’s visit to Toronto, Ontario, on May 29, 2009: (a) what were the costs of these visits to the government; (b) what did these costs cover, including security, transportation or other; (c) what, if any, is the protocol or agreement for incurring costs for visits of former heads of state to Canada; (d) did the government contribute to the speakers’ fees or any other fees related to the March or May events and, if so, what were the contributions; (e) what risk assessments are made and what risk factors are considered by the government when former heads of state visit Canada; (f) have any former heads of state been denied entry into Canada because of risk factors; and (g) does the government condone the exclusion of the media from these types of events, if the government is responsible for any of the costs related to these visits? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-292.8555-402-292 Former presidents Bush and Clinton's visits to CanadaBush, George C.Clinton, William Jefferson (Bill)Davies, LibbyGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPresident of the United States of AmericaQ-292Travel1592008//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-297Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Nanaimo—Cowichan, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-297.8555-402-297 Government spending within the constituency of Nanaimo—CowichanConstituenciesCrowder, JeanGovernment expendituresNanaimo—CowichanNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-2971592012//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-336Mr. Malhi (Bramalea—Gore—Malton) — What was the total federal spending from Industry Canada in the riding of Bramalea—Gore—Malton during each fiscal year from 2004-2005 to 2007-2008, itemized according to: (a) the date the money was received in the riding; (b) the dollar amount of the expenditure; (c) the federal program from which the funding came; (d) the department responsible for allocation of the funding; and (e) the recipient of the funding? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-336.8555-402-336 Industry CanadaBramalea—Gore—MaltonDepartment of IndustryGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMalhi, Gurbax S.Orders for return to written questionsQ-3361592038//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-347Ms. Dhalla (Brampton—Springdale) — What funds, grants, loans and loan guarantees has the government issued through its various departments and agencies in the constituency of Brampton—Springdale for the period of January 24, 2006 to April 2009 inclusive, and in each case where applicable: (a) what was the program under which the payment was made; (b) what were the names of the recipients; (c) what was the monetary value of the payment made; (d) on what date was the payment made; and (e) what was the percentage of program funding covered by the payment received? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-347.8555-402-347 Brampton-SpringdaleBrampton—SpringdaleConstituenciesDhalla, RubyGovernment expendituresGovernment loan guaranteesLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-3471592044//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-349Ms. Dhalla (Brampton—Springdale) — What funds, grants, loans and loan guarantee has the government issued through the Department of Human Resources and Skills Development over $1,000, since January 1, 2006, and in each case where applicable: (a) what was the name of the recipient; (b) what was the constituency of the recipient; (c) what was the program for which the grant, loan, or loan guarantee was given; (d) what was the date the application was received; (e) what was the amount of the individual grant, loan, or loan guarantee; (f) what was the date the payment was made; and (g) what was the total amount from all programs received by the recipient in that calendar year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-349.8555-402-349 Department of Human Resources and Skills DevelopmentConstituenciesDepartment of Employment and Social DevelopmentDhalla, RubyGovernment expendituresGovernment loan guaranteesLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-3491592045//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-351Ms. Leslie (Halifax) — With regard to spending related to Abousfian Abdelrazik: (a) what has been the total spending related to consular assistance given in Khartoum; (b) what have been the costs of the legal case on the part of the government; and (c) what have been the costs of communications and media work? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-351.8555-402-351 Abousfian AbdelrazikAbdelrazik, AbousfianGovernment expendituresImprisonment and prisonersKhartoumLeslie, Megan AnissaNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-351SudanTerrorism and terrorists1592046//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-356Mr. Szabo (Mississauga South) — With regards to infrastructure funding by the government since 2005: (a) what projects have been funded; (b) what was the total value for each project; (c) how much of the funding was provided by the Province of Ontario for each project; (d) how much of the funding was provided by the City of Mississauga for each project; (e) on what date was each project approved; and (f) on what date was the expenditure made by the government for each project? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-356.8555-402-356 Infrastructure FundingGovernment expendituresInfrastructureLiberal CaucusMississaugaOntarioOrders for return to written questionsQ-356Szabo, Paul1592050//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-359Ms. Hall Findlay (Willowdale) — With respect to information maintained by the office of the Receiver General and Public Works and Government Services Canada in the Central Financial Management Reporting System (CFMRS) relating to all government allocations, expenditures and lapses for fiscal year 2008-2009: (a) what were the cumulative allocations by department for fiscal year 2008-2009 as reflected in the CFMRS on June 17, 2009; (b) what were the cumulative expenditures by department for fiscal year 2008-2009 as reflected in the CFMRS on June 17, 2009; and (c) what were the cumulative lapses by department for fiscal year 2008-2009 as reflected in the CFMRS on June 17, 2009? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-359.8555-402-359 Central Financial Management Reporting SystemCentral Financial Management Reporting SystemFederal institutionsFinancial reporting systemGovernment expendituresHall Findlay, MarthaLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-3591592053//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-367Ms. Savoie (Victoria) — With regard to spending related to Omar Khadr: (a) what has been the total spending related to interrogations and intelligence work; (b) what have been the costs of the legal case on the part of the government; and (c) what have been the costs of communication and media work? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-367.8555-402-367 Omar KhadrChild soldiersGovernment expendituresGuantanamo BayKhadr, OmarLegal casesNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPrisoners of warQ-367Savoie, Denise1592056//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-368Ms. Savoie (Victoria) — With regard to spending related to Ronald Smith: (a) what has been the total spending related to consular assistance given in Khartoum; (b) what have been the costs of the legal case on the part of the government; and (c) what have been the costs of communication and media work? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-368.8555-402-368 Ronald SmithCapital punishmentCommuted sentencesGovernment expendituresImprisonment and prisonersLegal casesNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-368Savoie, DeniseSmith, Ronald Allen1592057//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-380Mr. Russell (Labrador) — With regard to infrastructure in Labrador: (a) has the federal government at any time since November 1, 2003, received any proposals, requests, or other like documentation in support of funding for all or any of the following projects or proposals, namely: (i) Nain Airport, (ii) Port Hope Simpson Airport, (iii) Goose Bay airport, (iv) any other airports or airstrips in Labrador, specifying which airports or airstrips, (v) widening, paving, or any other work on the Trans-Labrador Highway, specifying the nature and location of the work, (vi) any other work on any other highway in Labrador, specifying the nature and location of the work, (vii) a new ferry or ferries for the Labrador Straits ferry service, (viii) a harbour facility in or near the vicinity of Northwest Point, (ix) the construction of a hydro-electric plant at Gull Island, (x) the construction of a hydro-electric plant at Muskrat Falls, (xi) the construction of a transmission line from Labrador to Newfoundland, (xii) the construction of a transmission line from Labrador to Quebec, (xiii) the construction of a transmission line from Newfoundland to any other location in Canada, specifying which location, (xiv) a fixed link across the Strait of Belle Isle, (xv) a feasibility study concerning the construction of a highway from central to northern Labrador, or (xvi) broadband internet access in the region; (b) when did the federal government receive any proposal referred to above; (c) which department or departments has received the proposal or proposals; (d) what federal funding share is the provincial government seeking in respect of each or any proposal; (e) what has been the response of the appropriate federal government department to each or any proposal; (f) did the federal government receive from the provincial government, in December 2008, a proposal concerning funding for “Labrador priorities” or a similar heading, rubrique, or subject; (g) if so, what was the nature, scope, and content of the priorities identified in that proposal; (h) which department or department has dealt or is dealing with that proposal on behalf of the federal government; and (i) what has been the response of the federal government to the proposal? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-380.8555-402-380 Infrastructure in LabradorAirportsGovernment expendituresHighwaysInfrastructureLabradorLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-380Russell, Todd NormanTransportation infrastructure1592066//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-391Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — What is the total amount of government funding, allocated within the constituency of Mississauga—Brampton South since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-391.8555-402-391 Government spending within the constituency of Mississauga—Brampton SouthBains, NavdeepConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMississauga—Brampton SouthOrders for return to written questionsQ-3911592072//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-392Mr. Bains (Mississauga—Brampton South) — With regards to government spending on communications for each fiscal year since 2005-2006: (a) what is the total amount of government spending on communications per fiscal year; (b) how much does each department or agency spend on communications in general per fiscal year; (c) how much is spent by each department or agency in the following categories: advertising (broken down by television, radio, newspaper, internet), web design and maintenance and the printing of publications per fiscal year; (d) what is the total amount of money spent on backdrops used at press conferences per fiscal year; (e) detail total government spending by department or agency on any other communications products not covered by the above categories; (f) how much is spent on communications staff in each department or agency per fiscal year; and (g) what is the total number of communications staff in each department or agency? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-392.8555-402-392 Government spending on communicationsBains, NavdeepFederal institutionsGovernment advertisingGovernment expendituresInformation and communications technologies learning centresLiberal CaucusNews conferencesOrders for return to written questionsQ-3921592073//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-394Mrs. Jennings (Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Lachine) — With respect to the government’s 2009 spending: (a) excluding the Building Canada Fund, how much money was spent in the first 120 days of the government’s Economic Action Plan, that is from January 27 to May 26 on economic stimulus measures; (b) including the Building Canada Fund, how much money was spent in the first 120 days of the Plan, that is from January 27 to May 26 on economic stimulus measures; (c) with respect to the Building Canada Fund, which applications have received funding since 2006 within the province of Quebec; and (d) with respect to the Building Canada Fund, which applications have received funding since 2006 within the City of Montréal? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-394.8555-402-394 Government spending in 2009Budget 2009 (January 27, 2009)Building Canada FundCanada's Economic Action PlanEconomic stimulusGovernment expendituresInfrastructure Stimulus FundJennings, MarleneLiberal CaucusMontréalOrders for return to written questionsProvince of QuebecQ-3941592075//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-396Mr. Kennedy (Parkdale—High Park) — With respect to the Economic Action Plan in Budget 2009: (a) under the Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, (i) what projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) where are they located and in which federal riding, (iii) who are the partners involved, (iv) what is the federal contribution, (v) what are each partner's contribution, (vi) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vii) what were the criteria used to determine approved projects; (b) under the Building Fund Communities Component top-up, (i) what projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) where are they located and in which federal riding, (iii) who are the partners involved, (iv) what is the federal contribution, (v) what are each partner's contribution, (vi) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vii) what were the criteria used to determine approved projects; (c) under the Provincial/Territorial Base funding acceleration, (i) what projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) where are they located and in which federal riding, (iii) who are the partners involved, (iv) what is the federal contribution, (v) what are each partner's contribution, (vi) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vii) what were the criteria used to determine approved projects; (d) under the Recreational Infrastructure program, (i) what projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) where are they located and in which federal riding, (iii) who are the partners involved, (iv) what is the federal contribution, (v) what are each partner's contribution, (vi) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vii) what were the criteria used to determine approved projects; (e) under the Green Infrastructure Fund, (i) what projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) where are they located and in which federal riding, (iii) who are the partners involved, (iv) what is the federal contribution, (v) what are each partner's contribution, (vi) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vii) what were the criteria used to determine approved projects; and (f) under the National recreational trails program, (i) what projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) where are the located and in which federal riding, (iii) who are the partners involved, (iv) what is the federal contribution, (v) what are each partner's contribution, (vi) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vii) what were the criteria used to determine approved projects? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-396.8555-402-396 Economic Action Plan8570-402-6 Budget 2009Budget 2009 (January 27, 2009)Canada's Economic Action PlanCommunity organizationsConstituenciesEconomic stimulusGovernment expendituresGreen Infrastructure FundInfrastructure Stimulus FundKennedy, GerardLiberal CaucusNational Recreational Trails ProgramOrders for return to written questionsProvincial-Territorial Base FundingQ-396Recreational Infrastructure Canada1592076//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-397Mr. Kennedy (Parkdale—High Park) — With respect to the Knowledge Infrastructure programs within Budget 2009: (a) under the Universities and colleges program, (i) what projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) where are they located and in which federal riding, (iii) who are the partners involved, (iv) what is the federal contribution, (v) what are each partner's contribution, (vi) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vii) what were the criteria used to determine approved projects; (b) under the Canada Foundation for Innovation, (i) what projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) where are they located and in which federal riding, (iii) who are the partners involved, (iv) what is the federal contribution, (v) what are each partner's contribution, (vi) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vii) what were the criteria used to determine approved projects; (c) under Canada Health Infoway, (i) what projects have been approved for funding to date, ii) where are they located and in which federal riding, (iii) who are the partners involved, (iv) what is the federal contribution, (v) what are each partner's contribution, (vi) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vii) what were the criteria used to determine approved projects; (d) under the broadband in rural communities, (i) what projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) where are they located and in which federal riding, (iii) who are the partners involved, (iv) what is the federal contribution, (v) what are each partner's contribution, (vi) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vii) what were the criteria used to determine approved projects; and (e) under the First Nations infrastructure programs (i) what projects have been approved for funding to date, (ii) where are they located and in which federal riding, (iii) who are the partners involved, (iv) what is the federal contribution, (v) what are each partner's contribution, (vi) how much of the funding has flowed and to whom, (vii) what were the criteria used to determine approved projects? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-397.8555-402-397 Knowledge Infrastructure programs8570-402-6 Budget 2009Broadband Internet servicesBudget 2009 (January 27, 2009)Canada Foundation for InnovationCanada Health InfowayColleges and universitiesConstituenciesFirst Nations Infrastructure FundGovernment expendituresKennedy, GerardLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-397Rural communitiesUniversities and Colleges Knowledge Infrastructure Program1592077//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-398Mr. Kennedy (Parkdale—High Park) — With regards to the infrastructure programs within Budget 2009 and the Building Canada plan: (a) what are the due diligence guidelines and processes used to select approved projects for (i) Building Canada Fund Major infrastructure, (ii) Building Canada Fund Communities Component, (iii) Public-Private Partnerships Fund, (iv) Gateways and Border Crossings Fund, (v) Provincial-Territorial Base Funding, (vi) Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, (vii) Green Infrastructure Fund, (viii) Universities and Colleges Knowledge Infrastructure program; (b) what auditing requirements are being placed on approved projects for (i) Building Canada Fund Major infrastructure, (ii) Building Canada Fund Communities Component, (iii) Public-Private Partnerships Fund, (iv) Gateways and Border Crossings Fund, (v) Provincial-Territorial Base Funding, (vi) Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, (vii) Green Infrastructure Fund, (viii) Universities and Colleges Knowledge Infrastructure program; (c) was any targeting done for areas with respect to unemployment level or need for (i) Building Canada Fund Major infrastructure, (ii) Building Canada Fund Communities Component, (iii) Public-Private Partnerships Fund, (iv) Gateways and Border Crossings Fund, (v) Provincial-Territorial Base Funding, (vi) Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, (vii) Green Infrastructure Fund, (viii) Universities and Colleges Knowledge Infrastructure program; and (d) which projects were exempted due to changes in environmental regulations and/or changes to the Navigable waters protection act for (i) Building Canada Fund Major infrastructure, (ii) Building Canada Fund Communities Component, (iii) Public-Private Partnerships Fund, (iv) Gateways and Border Crossings Fund, (v) Provincial-Territorial Base Funding, (vi) Infrastructure Stimulus Fund, (vii) Green Infrastructure Fund, (viii) Universities and Colleges Knowledge Infrastructure program? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-398.8555-402-398 Infrastructure programsBudget 2009 (January 27, 2009)Building Canada PlanCommunity organizationsGateways and Border Crossings FundGovernment expendituresGreen Infrastructure FundInfrastructureInfrastructure Stimulus FundKennedy, GerardLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsProvincial-Territorial Base FundingPublic-private partnershipsQ-398Universities and Colleges Knowledge Infrastructure Program1592078//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-399Mr. Kennedy (Parkdale—High Park) — With regards to the infrastructure programs within Budget 2009 and the Building Canada plan: (a) do the Treasury Board guidelines differ in any way between the new infrastructure programs within the Economic Action plan and the Building Canada programs from Budget 2007; and (b) what analysis has been undertaken to evaluate the effects of infrastructure programs on increased costs of construction? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-399.8555-402-399 Infrastructure programsBudget 2007 (March 19, 2007)Budget 2009 (January 27, 2009)Building Canada PlanGovernment expendituresKennedy, GerardLiberal CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-399Treasury Board Secretariat1592079//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-196Mr. Rafferty (Thunder Bay—Rainy River) — With respect to Expert Panels created by the Minister of Finance since January 2006: (a) which Panels have been so struck, on what date, and which individuals are they composed of; (b) what was the length of duration of each Panel, when and in what locations did each Panel meet; (c) what were the final conclusions and recommendations made by each Panel and have these conclusions been made publicly accessible and, if so, what is the Internet address for each Panel conclusion; and (d) what compensation was paid to each member and what travel, hospitality and miscellaneous expenses were submitted by each panelist, according to each Panel? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-196.8555-402-196 Expert PanelsAccommodation and hospitality servicesConsultative Panel MembersDepartment of FinanceExpertsGovernment expendituresIncome and wagesNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-196Rafferty, JohnTask forces1574874//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-165Mr. Martin (Winnipeg Centre) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Winnipeg Centre, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-165.8555-402-165 Government spending in the constituency of Winnipeg CentreConstituenciesGovernment expendituresMartin, PatNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-165Winnipeg Centre1573322//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-168Ms. Savoie (Victoria) — What is the total amount of government funding, since fiscal year 2004-2005 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Victoria, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-168.8555-402-168 Government spending in the constituency of VictoriaConstituenciesGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-168Savoie, DeniseVictoria1573323//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the return to the following question made into an Order for Return: Q-162Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — With regards to the Canada’s operations in Afghanistan: (a) what is the total amount of money spent on translation of documents from Dari and Pashto to English and French in the past five years on a yearly basis and in total; (b) what is the number of staff in the Afghanistan Task Force who can speak, read and write in Dari in Kabul, in Kandahar and in Ottawa in the past five years on a yearly basis and in total; (c) what is the number of staff in the Afghanistan Task Force who can speak, read and write in Pashto, in Kabul, in Kandahar and in Ottawa in the past five years on a yearly basis and in total; (d) what is the total budget of Afghanistan Task Force for translation in the past five years on a yearly basis and in total; (e) what is the total budget of Afghanistan Task Force for communications in the past five years on a yearly basis and in total; (f) what is the number of staff on the Afghanistan Task Force responsible for communications in the past five years on a yearly basis and in total; and (g) what form of protection is offered to local Afghans working for Canada’s operations in Afghanistan who are citizens of Afghanistan at the end of their service with the Canadian government? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-162.8555-402-162 Operations in AfghanistanAfghanistanAfghanistan Task ForceCanadian Forces mission in AfghanistanDewar, PaulGovernment expendituresInformation and communicationNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-162SafetyTranslationWorkers1567539//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-152Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — With regards to the $33 billion Building Canada plan announced in Budget 2007: (a) what are the total federal funds committed for expenditure, as well as the amount effectively spent, to Canadian municipalities, through the Building Canada plan, per year, since its inception; (b) who are the recipients of these funds, what is the breakdown for every province and territory, as well as the criteria used for allocating these funds; and (c) what are the changes to the allocation criteria in Budget 2009? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-152.8555-402-152 Building CanadaBuilding Canada FundBuilding Canada PlanGovernment expendituresInfrastructureJulian, PeterNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-1521559034//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the return to the following question made into an Order for Return: Q-119Mrs. Hughes (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing) — What is the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 1998-1999 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-119.8555-402-119 Government spending in the constituency of Algoma—Manitoulin—KapuskasingAlgoma—Manitoulin—KapuskasingConstituenciesGovernment expendituresHughes, CarolNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsQ-1191512717//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-151Mr. Julian (Burnaby—New Westminster) — With respect to the government's hospitality spending: (a) how much did the government spend on the purchase of alcoholic drinks for hospitality purposes including wine, beer and hard liquor, during receptions and other similar events, such as lunches, dinners, meetings, and all such similar gatherings, hosted in the Parliamentary precinct, for the fiscal year 2007-2008; and (b) what departmental measures are in place to monitor expenditures on alcohol at public expense? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-151.8555-402-151 Government's hospitality spendingAccommodation and hospitality servicesGovernment expendituresJulian, PeterMembers of ParliamentNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsParliamentary precinctQ-1511498965//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnPursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into Orders for Return: Q-2Mr. Murphy (Charlottetown) — With regard to federal spending, how much financial support, both capital and otherwise, was given to individual airports over the last three fiscal years (2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007-2008) in each federal riding? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-2.8555-402-2 AirportsAirportsConstituenciesGovernment expendituresLiberal CaucusMurphy, ShawnOrders for return to written questionsQ-21479414//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-103Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — With regard to the Mountain Pine Beetle infestation: (a) what is the financial commitment for the current fiscal year to combat the spread of the Mountain Pine Beetle, and what department is responsible for the expenditure; and (b) from the $200 million invested by the government in the Mountain Pine Beetle Program, what is the breakdown of the money spent by (i) the Department of Natural Resources, (ii) the Department of Transport, (iii) the Department of Western Economic Diversification? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-103.8555-402-103 Mountain pine beetleCullen, NathanDepartment of Natural ResourcesDepartment of TransportDepartment of Western Economic DiversificationGovernment expendituresNew Democratic Party CaucusOrders for return to written questionsPine beetlesQ-1031479415//www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/25520TomLukiwskiTom-LukiwskiRegina—Lumsden—Lake CentreConservative CaucusSaskatchewan//www.ourcommons.ca/Content/Parliamentarians/Images/OfficialMPPhotos/43/LukiwskiTom_CPC.jpgDaily Routine Of BusinessQuestions on the Order PaperMade Order for ReturnQ-104Mr. Gravelle (Nickel Belt) — What was the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, allocated within the constituency of Nickel Belt, listing each department or agency, initiative, and amount by fiscal year? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-402-104.8555-402-104 Government spending in the constituency of Nickel BeltGovernment expendituresGravelle, ClaudeNew Democratic Party CaucusNickel BeltOrders for return to written questionsQ-1041479416INTERVENTIONParliament and SessionOrder of BusinessTopicProcedural TermSearchResults per pageOrder byTarget search languageSide by SideMaximum returned rowsPagePUBLICATION TYPE