Journals
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 15 of 88
2011-03-25 [p.1424]
— by Mr. Duncan (Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, Federal Interlocutor for Métis and Non-Status Indians and Minister of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency) — Response of the government, pursuant to Standing Order 109, to the Second Report of the Standing Joint Committee on Scrutiny of Regulations (review of statutory instruments) (Sessional Paper No. 8510-403-167), presented to the House on Friday, December 10, 2010. — Sessional Paper No. 8512-403-167.
2011-03-25 [p.1432]
Pursuant to Standing Order 39(5), the failure of the Ministry to respond to the following question was deemed referred to the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development:
Q-956 — Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan) — With regard to the British Columbia Treaty Process: (a) what substantive actions has the government taken to study the issue of accumulation of interest from treaty loans; (b) how does the debt from this interest affect the treaty negotiations; (c) when will the government outline its new approach to funding for First Nations self-government as announced in the March 2010 budget; (d) how has the federal mandate on negotiation changed since 2006; (e) how many treaty loans will come due in 2011; (f) what is the total value of those treaty loans coming due in 2011; (g) what is the total value of interest on those loans; (h) what steps has the government taken to extend the deadline on treaty loans; (i) when will the government report to the House of Commons on the treaty loan deadline; and (j) what is the government's communications plan as concerns the treaty loan deadline and First Nations, including those First Nations involved in treaty negotiations, those that have dropped out of the process and those First Nations that are not involved in treaty negotiations?
2011-03-21 [p.1381]
Q-874 — Mr. Bagnell (Yukon) — With regard to the government's current negotiation of Comprehensive Land Claims Agreements and Self-Government Agreements with Canada’s First Nations: (a) for each negotiation, (i) with which First Nation is the government negotiating, (ii) what is the status of the negotiation, (iii) how does the First Nation claim compare with the government's position, including both parties' positions on land mass, boundary outlines and monetary requests, (iv) to date, how much time has been spent on the claim negotiation, (v) to date, what is the total cost of the negotiations of the claim, (vi) when are negotiations expected to be concluded; (b) how many of these claims are Canada's negotiators currently negotiating, and which ones are temporarily on hold and for what reasons; (c) in failed negotiations, will court settlements be necessary to resolve the claim and, if so, which claims are expected to end up in court or are already before the courts; (d) what has the government budgeted for comprehensive land claim negotiations; and (e) what has the government budgeted for comprehensive land claim settlement payments to First Nation communities with which they are now negotiating? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-874.
2011-02-09 [p.1205]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Rickford (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development) laid upon the Table, — Annual Report of the Westbank First Nation Self-Government for 2007-2008. — Sessional Paper No. 8525-403-32.
2011-01-31 [p.1130]
Q-640 — Mr. Russell (Labrador) — With respect to First Nations treaty-making in British Columbia: (a) how many treaties have been concluded with First Nations in the province since January 1, 1990; (b) how many treaty negotiations are currently underway in British Columbia and with which First Nations; (c) how many treaty negotiations are expected to be concluded before December 31, 2011; (d) what are the mandates for the federal negotiators with respect to each such treaty negotiation; (e) are any such treaty negotiations affected or delayed by the Cohen Inquiry and, if so, which negotiation or negotiations and what are the government’s plans to alleviate any such delay? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-640.
2010-12-15 [p.1084]
Q-539 — Ms. Leslie (Halifax) — With regard to Health Canada funding and the allocation of full-time equivalents (FTEs): (a) what is the number of FTEs allocated by the Department in each province and territory, including the Department's headquarters in the National Capital Region, each fiscal year since 2006-2007, up to and including the current fiscal year; (b) how much funding was spent to support operations in each province and territory, including the Department’s headquarters in the National Capital Region, each fiscal year since 2006-2007, up to and including the current fiscal year; (c) what is the number of FTEs allocated in each province and territory with respect to the delivery of First Nations and Inuit health programs and services, each fiscal year since 2006-2007, up to and including the current fiscal year; (d) what are the names of the projects and how much money was committed to each of those projects by Health Canada as part of the Economic Action Plan; and (e) why, as stated in the 2010-11 business plan, is the Department projecting a decrease in FTEs for 2011-2012 and a further decrease in 2012-2013? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-539.
2010-12-10 [p.1047]
Mr. Kania (Brampton West), from the Standing Joint Committee on Scrutiny of Regulations, presented the Second Report of the Committee (review of statutory instruments). — Sessional Paper No. 8510-403-167.
Pursuant to Standing Order 109, the Committee requested that the government table a comprehensive response.
A copy of the relevant Minutes of Proceedings (Meeting No. 14) was tabled.
2010-12-09 [p.1035]
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), Mr. Lukiwski (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) laid upon the Table, — Government responses, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), to the following petitions:
— Nos. 403-1024 and 403-1025 concerning the education system. — Sessional Paper No. 8545-403-105-01.
2010-12-08 [p.1030]
Q-509 — Mr. Russell (Labrador) — With regard to government expenditures in Labrador during fiscal years 2009-2010 and 2010-2011: (a) what is the value of (i) each grant, contribution, repayable contribution, loan, or contract for the supply of goods or services made or awarded to any group, business or organization located in Labrador, (ii) each grant, contribution, repayable contribution, loan, or contract for the supply of goods or services made or awarded to any group, business or organization located outside Labrador but for activities carried out within Labrador, (iii) each transfer payment or other payment to the province of Newfoundland and Labrador for work or activities primarily carried out in Labrador, a municipality in Labrador, or a First Nations, Inuit or Innu local government in Labrador; and (b) for each case in (a), (i) what was the specific government department or agency which made the grant, contribution, repayable contribution, loan, contract for the supply of goods or services, or transfer or other payment, (ii) on what date was it made or awarded by the department or agency, (iii) under which program, policy or authority was it made or awarded? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-403-509.
2010-12-07 [p.1015]
Pursuant to Order made Thursday, December 2, 2010, the House proceeded to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should immediately propose legislation to ban bulk oil tanker traffic in the Dixon Entrance, Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound as a way to protect the West Coast's unique and diverse ocean ecosystem, to preserve the marine resources which sustain the community and regional economies of British Columbia, and to honour the extensive First Nations rights and title in the area.
The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:
(Division No. 139 -- Vote no 139) - View vote details.
YEAS: 143, NAYS: 138
2010-12-02 [p.985]
The Order was read for the consideration of the Business of Supply.
Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), moved, — That, in the opinion of the House, the government should immediately propose legislation to ban bulk oil tanker traffic in the Dixon Entrance, Hecate Strait and Queen Charlotte Sound as a way to protect the West Coast's unique and diverse ocean ecosystem, to preserve the marine resources which sustain the community and regional economies of British Columbia, and to honour the extensive First Nations rights and title in the area.
Debate arose thereon.
2010-12-02 [p.985]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), in relation to the Business of Supply.
The debate continued.
2010-12-02 [p.986]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), in relation to the Business of Supply.
The debate continued.
2010-12-02 [p.986]
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Cullen (Skeena—Bulkley Valley), seconded by Ms. Crowder (Nanaimo—Cowichan), in relation to the Business of Supply.
The debate continued.
Results: 1 - 15 of 88 | Page: 1 of 6

1
2
3
4
5
6
>
>|
Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data