Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 1 of 1
View Kelly McCauley Profile
You're not using vote 10 for that. In this specific example, you're using it for money for CRA, as it lapses hundreds of millions of dollars. I understand what you're trying to say and what the purpose is, but it's not being used for that purpose.
Will we see you as president go back to what has been traditionally, over the last 10 to 15 years, used for a specific purpose and not a balloon amount used as a slush fund or to cover other departments that cannot get their act together, for lack of better words?
I, and I'm sure my colleagues around the table, have been very vocal. We want to see transparency and we want to see the proper plans for this money before it goes out the door. Three and a half million dollars was for a department that cannot get its act together and lapsed hundreds of millions. It doesn't need money from a strategic cross-government fund.
I'll ask again, will we see a reduction to traditional levels and an increase in transparency for this?
Result: 1 - 1 of 1

Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data