Committee
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Consult the user guide
For assistance, please contact us
Add search criteria
Results: 1 - 1 of 1
View Alain Therrien Profile
BQ (QC)
View Alain Therrien Profile
2020-02-04 12:17
I know we have access to interpretation. As I said earlier, I just want to be able to follow the discussion more easily. I'm used to having a document to refer to, something that would have said “delete the word ‘third’” and so forth. That's all I'm saying.
I wasn't trying to disparage anyone. I was simply wondering whether this was normal procedure for subamendments or whether it might be a better idea to put it all in writing so that everyone's job was easier and we could follow along with greater ease.
You heard it here first: if I ever have any amendments or subamendments to put forward, they'll be written down and handed out to you. Now I'll wait to hear what you have to say. I think we can have clearer discussions going forward.
I have to say that one of the Conservative members—I don't know who—brought me over the information. I must have seemed like a lost soul. Everything's fine now.
It didn't have anything to do with the interpretation. It's just that I'm not used to proceeding this way. I'm new, so forgive me if I disrupt things. That's not what I'm trying to do.
Result: 1 - 1 of 1

Export As: XML CSV RSS

For more data options, please see Open Data