House of Commons Procedure and Practice

Second Edition, 2009

House of Commons Procedure and Practice - 10. The Daily Program - Private Members' Business

 

Each sitting day, one hour is set aside for Private Members’ Business,[366] that is, for the consideration of bills and motions presented and sponsored by Members of the House of Commons who are not Ministers or Parliamentary Secretaries. This hour commences at 11:00 a.m. on Mondays, 5:30 p.m. on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, and 1:30 p.m. on Fridays.[367]

*   Historical Perspective

From 1867 to 1906, Private Members’ Business had precedence over government business on particular days of the week.[368] However, by means of special or sessional orders, the House regularly gave precedence to government business. In 1906, the weekly order of business was officially amended so that four weeks from the start of each session one of the three Private Members’ Days—Thursday—was given over to Government Orders.[369]

Until 1955, there were few changes to the daily order of business, and the use of special and sessional orders continued to appropriate much of the time set aside for Private Members’ Business. In 1955, amendments to the Standing Orders formalized the practice of giving precedence to Government Orders and guaranteed private Members six Mondays and two Thursdays per session to conduct their business.[370]

In 1962, the House abandoned the allocation of a certain number of days each session for Private Members’ Business, setting aside instead one hour per day for that purpose.[371] After the hour for Private Members’ Business was used 40 times per session on Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays, it would lapse on those days, only taking place thereafter on Thursdays and Fridays. In 1968, Private Members’ Business was removed from the order of business on Wednesdays; the rule setting a maximum of 40 considerations per session for Private Members’ Business was retained for Mondays and Tuesdays only; thereafter, Private Members’ Business was held only on Thursdays and Fridays.[372] This schedule of business remained intact until 1982, when the practice of considering Private Members’ Business one hour every day except Wednesdays was replaced by a single Private Members’ Day on Wednesdays.[373] This meant a reduction of one hour in debating time per week, from four hours to three. In late 1983, the House reverted to the consideration of Private Members’ Business for one hour per day on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, without the previous provision for a maximum number of times for consideration on Mondays and Tuesdays;[374] this meant that the amount of time provided for Private Members’ Business actually increased. There were no changes to this arrangement until 1991 when amendments to the Standing Orders added an extra hour to the sitting on Wednesdays in order to provide another hour of Private Members’ Business, thus increasing from four to five the number each week.[375] In February 1994, further changes to the House’s schedule resulted in adjustments to the time when Private Members’ Business would be taken up, although one hour a day continued to be set aside for this purpose.[376]

The conditions under which Private Members’ Business could be suspended were the object of lengthy discussions in the House. Of these conditions, the two that received the greatest attention were the Standing Order suspending Private Members’ Business on allotted days and the Standing Order suspending Private Members’ Business in the event that a Member whose item was scheduled for debate could not attend the House that day. This led to changes to the Standing Orders in May 1990 to permit Private Members’ Business on allotted days, except on the last allotted day in the June period. This change was made permanent in April 1991.[377] In the event that a Member would be absent on the day his or her bill or motion was scheduled for debate in the House, amendments made to the Standing Orders in April 1991 increased the notice required by the Speaker from 24 to 48 hours and permitted an exchange of votable as well as non-votable items in the Order of Precedence.[378]

In March 2003, the Special Committee on the Modernization and Improvement of the Procedures of the House of Commons, like the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs before it, proposed changes to the Standing Orders which would improve procedures for Private Members’ Business.[379] The House adopted these amendments to the Standing Orders on a provisional basis in March 2003,[380] and permanently in May 2005.[381] Changes to Private Members’ Business were made in the following areas: the House removed the provisions that Private Members’ Business be suspended on days when there is resumed debate on the budget or on the Address in Reply to the Speech from the Throne. In addition, since most items are debated for two hours only and since recorded divisions are automatically deferred, debate is interrupted at the end of the final hour rather than 15 minutes before its expiry. Changes were also made to limit the number of exchanges that could be requested by sponsors of an item. Members whose absence cause Private Members’ Business to be suspended are prohibited from requesting an exchange in the future[382] and will see their item dropped from the Order Paper if they are absent a second time.[383]

*   Suspension of Private Members’ Business

Consideration of Private Members’ Business may be suspended on certain occasions, namely:

*       on any day the House proceeds to elect a Speaker;[384]

*       on any day designated for the presentation of the Budget Speech if it is scheduled to take place before Private Members’ Business;[385]

*       on any day when an emergency debate takes place before Private Members’ Business;[386]

*       on any day when a Minister of the Crown moves a motion on a matter the government considers to be of an urgent nature, and that debate takes place in the time normally provided for Private Members’ Business;[387]

*       on the last allotted day of the supply period ending June 23, unless it is a Monday, when Private Members’ Business takes place at the beginning of the sitting;[388]

*       on any day when a question of privilege is being considered by the House;[389] and

*       on any day prior to the establishment of the Order of Precedence.[390]

Because Members must be aware of when particular items are expected to be called for consideration, the Standing Orders require the Speaker to ensure that Members are given at least 24 hours’ notice of which item is to be considered during Private Members’ Business on the next sitting day.[391] This notification must be published in the Notice Paper.

A Member whose motion or bill is scheduled for consideration during Private Members’ Business and who is unable to be present that day to move the motion may notify the Speaker in writing 48 hours in advance. The Speaker has the authority to arrange an exchange with another item on the Order of Precedence with the permission of the Members involved and Private Members’ Business proceeds as usual.[392] Should such an exchange be impossible, Private Members’ Business is suspended for the day, and the House continues with the business previously before it.[393] Should this occur on a Monday, the House would then begin consideration of Government Orders at 11:00 a.m. instead of at noon.[394]

When Private Members’ Business is reached, should a Member be unable to move his or her scheduled item when called, then Private Members’ Business is suspended for that day.[395] On Mondays, the sitting is suspended until noon, at which time the House commences with Government Orders.[396] On Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays, the sitting is suspended until the Adjournment Proceedings. When this occurs on a Friday, the Speaker adjourns the House.[397]

Finally, as much of Private Members’ Business is suspended as necessary on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays to allow the House to continue Routine Proceedings until the completion of “Introduction of Government Bills”.[398]

Private Members’ Business may be delayed or interrupted for a number of reasons. Should this occur, the debate on the item of business is then extended or rescheduled to another time.[399] For example, if consideration of Private Members’ Business is delayed because of a recorded division,[400] by the moving of a time allocation motion,[401] by a ministerial statement,[402] by Royal Assent,[403] or due to an emergency alarm,[404] then Private Members’ Business is extended by a corresponding amount of time.[405] If the delay or interruption extends 30 minutes or more beyond the ordinary ending of Private Members’ Business, the Speaker will add the remaining time or the entire hour to another sitting.[406] The rescheduled debate takes place within 10 sitting days, but no more than one adjournment period as provided in the House calendar may intervene in the rescheduling of the debate. The rescheduled business is considered during an additional Private Members’ Business, which is added to the daily schedule of the House, usually after the ordinary hour of daily adjournment; 24 hours’ notice is given.[407]



[366] At the beginning of a Parliament, Private Members’ Business does not take place until the Order of Precedence has been established (Standing Order 91).

[367] Standing Order 30(6).

[368] See Rules, Orders and Forms of Proceedings of the House of Commons of Canada, 1868, 1873, 1876, 1880, 1884, 1890, 1893, 1896, 1901, 1904 and 1905, Rule No. 19.

[369] Debates, July 9, 1906, cols. 7475‑7.

[370] Journals, July 12, 1955, pp. 889‑93.

[371] Journals, April 10, 1962, pp. 338‑9; April 12, 1962, p. 350.

[372] Journals, December 6, 1968, pp. 436‑7; December 20, 1968, pp. 563‑5.

[373] Third Report of the Special Committee on Standing Orders and Procedure, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence, November 4, 1982, Issue No. 7, pp. 14‑5, presented to the House on November 5, 1982 (Journals, p. 5328), and concurred in on November 29, 1982 (Journals, p. 5400).

[374] First Report of the Special Committee on Standing Orders, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence, December 15, 1983, Issue No. 2, pp. 3‑4, presented to the House on December 15, 1983 (Journals, p. 47), and concurred in on December 19, 1983 (Journals, pp. 55‑6). In its Tenth Report, presented to the House on September 30, 1983 (Journals, p. 6250), the Committee had noted that some Members had concerns about one full day being set aside for Private Members’ Business because it disrupted the flow of business in the House. The Committee recommended that a more in‑depth study be done to determine what day or days should be set aside for Private Members’ Business in order to accommodate the largest possible number of Members and to encourage participation (Special Committee on Standing Orders and Procedure, Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence, September 29, 1983, Issue No. 24, p. 7).

[375] Journals, April 11, 1991, pp. 2905‑6, 2908.

[376] Journals, February 7, 1994, p. 117. Private Members’ Business was moved to 5:30 p.m. on Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays and to 1:30 p.m. on Fridays.

[377] Journals, May 10, 1990, pp. 1685-7; April 11, 1991, pp. 2921-2. The changes provisionally adopted in May 1990 lapsed on the last sitting day in December 1990, despite recommendations that they be made permanent in the Twenty-First Report of the Standing Committee on Privileges and Elections, presented to the House on December 6, 1990 (Journals, pp. 2385-6).

[378] Journals, April 11, 1991, p. 2921. These amendments further improved those made by the House on December 18, 1986 (Journals, p. 351), and incorporated into the Standing Orders on June 3, 1987 (Journals, p. 1021). It is interesting to note that the Standing Committee on Privileges and Elections had recommended many of these changes in its Twenty-First Report (Journals, December 6, 1990, pp. 2385‑8), even though the House did not concur in the Report.

[379] See the Sixty-Sixth Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented to the House on June 12, 2002 (Journals, p. 1571). See also the Fourth Report of the Committee, presented to the House on October 30, 2002 (Journals, p. 138), and concurred in on November 6, 2002 (Journals, p. 170). For further information about the reform of the rules governing the consideration of Private Members’ Business, see Chapter 21, “Private Members’ Business”.

[380] See the First Report of the Special Committee on the Modernization and Improvement of the Procedures of the House of Commons, presented to the House and concurred in on February 20, 2003 (Journals, p. 439), as well as the Committee’s Third Report, presented to the House on February 28, 2003 (Journals, p. 492), and concurred in on March 17, 2003 (Journals, p. 495).

[381] Thirty-Seventh Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented to the House and concurred in on May 11, 2005 (Journals, pp. 738-9).

[382] In June 2000, Members complained about the repeated absence of a Member when his bill was to be debated during Private Members’ Business (Debates, June 5, 2000, pp. 7425‑6; June 7, 2000, pp. 7632-3; June 15, 2000, pp. 8073-4).

[383] See, for example, Journals, April 19, 2004, p. 269, Debates, p. 2047.

[384] Standing Order 2(3).

[385] Standing Order 83(2).

[386] Standing Order 52(14). See Chapter 15, “Special Debates”.

[387] Standing Order 99(1). See Chapter 15, “Special Debates”.

[388] Standing Order 99(1).

[389] See, for example, Journals, February 1, 2002, pp. 991-4; February 4, 2002, pp. 997‑8; November 3, 2005, pp. 1250-1; November 4, 2005, pp. 1253-6; November 14, 2005, pp. 1259‑67. A privilege motion, once under debate, has priority over all Orders of the Day including Government Orders and Private Members’ Business. However, the debate does not interfere with the regular holding of Routine Proceedings, Statements by Members, Question Period, Royal Assent, the Adjournment Proceedings or the taking of a division. For further information on matters of privilege, see Chapter 3, “Privileges and immunities”.

[390] Standing Order 91.

[391] Standing Order 94(1)(a).

[392] Standing Order 94(2)(a).

[393] Standing Order 94(2)(b). Since the coming into force of this Standing Order, the Speaker has instructed, on such occasions, that the item be dropped to the bottom of the Order of Precedence. See, for example, Debates, March 26, 1998, p. 5442; March 10, 2005, p. 4292; May 5, 2005, p. 5743. Since 2001, however, the House has limited the number of exchanges that can be requested by sponsors of an item. Members whose absence cause Private Members’ Business to be suspended are prohibited from requesting an exchange in the future and will see their item dropped from the Order Paper if they are absent a second time (Standing Order 94(2)(c)).

[394] Standing Order 99(2). See, for example, Debates, May 8, 1998, p. 6736; February 6, 2004, p. 283.

[395] Long before this practice was established, there was another provision governing this type of situation in the Standing Orders, and in fact it still exists. Standing Order 94(1)(b) provides that if the Speaker were unable to notify the House at least 24 hours in advance of the item to be considered, then Private Members’ Business would be suspended and the House would continue with the business before it. This provision was included in the Standing Orders for unforeseen and unexpected circumstances and, in practice, it is unlikely to be invoked.

[396] See, for example, Debates, February 22, 1993, p. 16247; Journals, November 28, 2005, p. 1347, Debates, p. 10183.

[397] See, for example, Debates, April 23, 1993, p. 18413; April 11, 2003, p. 5418.

[398] Standing Order 30(4)(a) and (b).

[399] Standing Order 30(7). See, for example, Journals, February 16, 2000, p. 921, Debates, p. 3625; Debates, November 27, 2001, pp. 7571-2, 7602; Order Paper and Notice Paper, November 28, 2001, p. 31; Debates, March 21, 2007, p. 7743; Order Paper and Notice Paper, March 22, 2007, p. 35.

[400] See, for example, Journals, June 13, 2006, p. 275, Debates, pp. 2344-50.

[401] Standing Order 67.1. The time set aside for the 30-minute question period on a time allocation motion is added to the time provided for Government Orders. The hour for Private Members’ Business, where applicable, and the ordinary hour of daily adjournment may be delayed accordingly.

[402] See, for example, Debates, November 6, 1997, pp. 1666, 1684; November 2, 2006, pp. 4657, 4673.

[403] See, for example, Debates, March 20, 1997, p. 9306.

[404] See, for example, Debates, February 16, 2000, p. 3625.

[405] Prior to February 1994, when Standing Order 30(7) was amended to provide for delays or interruptions in Private Members’ Business for any reason, Private Members’ Business could be extended only with the unanimous consent of the House. See, for example, Debates, October 2, 1991, p. 3190; June 4, 1992, p. 11438.

[406] Standing Order 30(7). See, for example, Debates, October 5, 2005, p. 8471; October 7, 2005, p. 8562; Journals, October 20, 2005, p. 1183; March 5, 2008, pp. 3700-1; March 10, 2008, p. 3859; Journals, March 12, 2008, p. 588.

[407] As an example, on Wednesday, October 5, 2005, Private Members’ Business was scheduled to take place from 5:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Because of numerous recorded divisions, the House was not ready to proceed to Private Members’ Business until 7:20 p.m., 50 minutes past the time Private Members’ Business would normally have ended. Pursuant to the Standing Orders, the Speaker was required to reschedule the debate to another sitting. See Journals, October 5, 2005, p. 1118, Debates, pp. 8460-71, in particular p. 8471; Journals, October 20, 2005, p. 1183, Debates, p. 8829; Order Paper and Notice Paper, October 5, 2005, p. 36; October 6, 2005, p. 31; October 17, 2005, p. 31.

Top of Page