House of Commons Procedure and Practice

Second Edition, 2009

House of Commons Procedure and Practice - 16. The Legislative Process - Structure of Bills

 

A bill is composed of a number of elements, some of which, such as the title, are essential, while others, such as the preamble, are optional. The following is a description of the various elements of a bill.

*   Number

When a bill is introduced in the House, it is assigned a number to facilitate filing and reference.[107] During each session of a Parliament, government bills are numbered consecutively from C‑2 to C‑200,[108] while private Members’ bills are numbered consecutively from C‑201 to C‑1000 throughout the life of a Parliament, since they are not nullified by prorogation. Private bills, which are rarely introduced in the House, are numbered beginning at C‑1001. In order to differentiate between bills introduced in the two Houses of Parliament, the number assigned to bills introduced in the Senate begins with an “S” rather than a “C”. Government bills originating in the Senate are numbered consecutively from S‑1 to S-200, Senators’ public bills are numbered consecutively from S-201 to S-1000, and Senators’ private bills are numbered beginning at S-1001. Senate bills are neither renumbered nor reprinted when they are sent to the Commons.[109]

*   Title

The title is an essential element of a bill. A bill may have two titles: a full or long title and an abbreviated or short title.[110] The long title appears both on the bill’s cover page, under the number assigned to the bill, and at the top of the first page of the document. It sets out the purpose of the bill, in general terms, and must accurately reflect its content. The short title is used mainly for purposes of citation, and does not necessarily cover all aspects of the bill.[111] The first clause of the bill normally sets out the short title (except in the case of bills amending other Acts, which do not have a short title).

*   Preamble

Sometimes a bill has a preamble, which sets out its purposes and the reasons for introducing it.[112] The preamble appears between the long title and the enacting clause.

*   Enacting Clause

The enacting clause is an essential part of the bill. It states the authority under which it is enacted, and consists of a brief paragraph following the long title and preceding the provisions of the bill: “Her Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate and House of Commons of Canada, enacts as follows:”. In the event that there is a preamble, the enacting clause follows it.[113]

*   Clause

Clauses—particular and separate articles of a bill—are its most fundamental constitutive element. Clauses may be divided into subclauses, and then into paragraphs and even subparagraphs.[114] A bill may (but need not) also be divided into parts, divisions and subdivisions, each containing one or more clauses; however, the numbering of the clauses is continuous from beginning to end. A clause should express a single idea, preferably in a single sentence. A number of related ideas may be set out in subclauses within a single clause.[115]

*   Interpretation Provisions

A bill will sometimes include (usually among its initial clauses) definitions or rules of interpretation[116] which provide a legal definition of key expressions used in the legislation and indicate how those expressions apply. There is, however, no formal requirement that a bill include interpretation provisions.

*   Coming-into-force Provisions

A clause may be included in a bill specifying when the bill or certain of its provisions shall come into force. The coming-into-force of legislation may be delayed after Royal Assent, if the bill contains a clause providing for its proclamation on another specific date or on a date to be fixed by Order in Council. Otherwise, the bill will come into force on the day it is assented to.[117]

*   Schedules

Schedules providing details that are essential to certain provisions of a bill may be appended to it. There are two types of schedules:[118] those that contain material unsuited to insertion in the main body of the bill, such as, for example, tables, diagrams, lists and maps,[119] and those that reproduce agreements falling within the prerogative of the Crown, such as, for example, treaties and conventions.[120]

*   Explanatory Notes

When the purpose of a bill is to amend an existing Act, the drafters will insert notes to explain the amendments made by the bill. Among other things, these notes reproduce the original text of the provisions affected by the bill. They are not considered to be part of the bill, and they disappear from subsequent reprints.[121]

*   Summary

The summary is a comprehensive and usually brief recapitulation of the substance of a bill. It offers “a clear, factual, non‑partisan summary of the purpose of the bill and its main provisions”.[122] The purpose of the summary is to contribute to a better understanding of the contents of the bill, of which it is not a part. For this reason, it appears separately at the beginning of the bill. Once the bill has been passed, it will also appear on a page affixed to the front of printed versions of the resulting Act.[123]

*   Marginal Notes

Marginal notes are short explanations that appear in the margin of a bill. They are not part of the bill, and are included only as readers’ aids or for information purposes.[124]

*   Underlining and Vertical Lines

In a bill that amends an existing Act, new text is underlined when it consists of long passages, or simply indicated with a vertical line (in the margin beside the new clauses, subclauses or paragraphs). When a bill that has been amended in committee is reprinted, only the additions made since the last printing are highlighted in this manner.

*   Headings

To assist the reader, legislative drafters insert headings throughout the text. In past practice, such headings have never been considered to be part of the bill and have not therefore been subject to amendment.[125]

*   Table of Contents

As an aid to readers, legislative drafters sometimes add a table of contents to a bill. It is not, however, considered to be part of the bill.

*   Royal Recommendation

Bills that involve the expenditure of public funds must be accompanied by a royal recommendation[126] issued by the Governor General and generally (although not necessarily) communicated to the House before a bill is introduced. The royal recommendation must be published in the Notice Paper and printed in or annexed to the beginning of the bill.[127] The royal recommendation is not a part of the bill, but appears separately at its beginning.[128] After the bill is given first reading, the text of the royal recommendation is printed in the Journals. A royal recommendation may only be obtained by the government, since it is granted by the Governor General on the advice of the Prime Minister and Cabinet.



[107] On March 12, 1974, Speaker Lamoureux announced the implementation of the numbering system now in effect in the House (Journals, pp. 31‑2). At the beginning of each new session the numbering starts over. By unanimous consent, private Members’ bills identical in form and content to bills introduced during a previous Parliament are sometimes assigned the numbers they bore before the dissolution (see, for example, Debates, October 12, 2004, pp. 222‑3; October 20, 2004, pp. 610‑1).

[108] The number C‑1 is reserved for the pro forma bill that is traditionally introduced at the beginning of each new session.

[109] See the Fifth Report of the Standing Senate Committee on Rules, Procedures and the Rights of Parliament, presented to the Senate on June 29, 2005 (Journals of the Senate, pp. 1070-1) and concurred in on June 30, 2005 (Journals of the Senate, p. 1078). Prior to the adoption of the report, all Senate bills were numbered consecutively from S‑1, regardless of the type of the bill.

[110] For example, Bill C‑15 (2007) gives the long title as follows: An Act respecting the exploitation of the Donkin coal block and employment in or in connection with the operation of a mine that is wholly or partly at the Donkin coal block, and to make a consequential amendment to the Canada‑Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act. The short title reads: Donkin Coal Block Development Opportunity Act.

[111] See Sullivan, R., Sullivan and Driedger on the Construction of Statutes, 4th ed., Markham, Ontario: LexisNexis, 2002, pp. 294‑5. A growing number of legislative assemblies, including some in Canada, are eliminating the use of long titles (Sullivan, 4th ed., p. 294, note 55).

[112] Interpretation Act, R.S. 1985, c. I‑21, s. 13. Preambles may assist the courts in understanding and construing legislation, and judges sometimes refer to the preamble in writing their judgements (Sullivan, 4th ed., pp. 296‑300).

[113] Interpretation Act, R.S. 1985, c. I‑21, s. 4.

[114] In English, the practice is to use the expression “clause” until a bill becomes law, after which the expression “section” is used. In French, no such distinction is made and the expression “article” is always used.

[115] While there is no specific rule regarding the content of bills, there must still be a theme of relevancy among the various issues addressed in the bill. Those issues must be relevant to and subject to the umbrella which is raised by the terminology of the long title of the bill. See Speaker Lamoureux’s ruling, Journals, May 6, 1971, pp. 531‑2.

[116] Interpretation Act, R.S. 1985, c. I‑21, s. 15.

[117] Interpretation Act, R.S. 1985, c. I-21, 6(2)(a). When Royal Assent is signified by written declaration, the Act is deemed to be assented to on the day on which the two Houses of Parliament have been notified of the declaration. See Royal Assent Act, S.C. 2002, c. 15, s. 5.

[118] See Sullivan, R., Driedger on the Construction of Statutes, 3rd ed., Toronto and Vancouver: Butterworths, 1994, pp. 279‑84.

[119] See, for example, An Act respecting Employment Insurance in Canada, S.C. 1996, c. 23; Appropriation Act No. 4, 1995‑1996, S.C. 1996, c. 4; International Bridges and Tunnels Act, S.C. 2007, c. 1.

[120] See, for example, Canada‑Finland Tax Convention Act, 2006, S.C. 2006, c. 8, s. 2.

[121] Members have in the past opposed a bill where the explanatory notes appeared to be insufficient. Speaker Lamoureux rejected the objection, stating that the Standing Orders do not require that an explanatory note accompany a bill (Debates, March 29, 1972, pp. 1267‑8).

[122] Guide to Making Federal Acts and Regulations, 2nd ed., ch. 2.3.

[123] See, for example, Railway Continuation Act, 2007, S.C. 2007, c. 8.

[124] Interpretation Act, R.S. 1985, c. I‑21, s. 14. Traditionally, the courts have preferred to ignore marginal notes in construing statutes. However, that attitude is changing; in one of its judgements, the Supreme Court relied on marginal notes (Sullivan, 4th ed., pp. 309‑11).

[125] In recent years, however, some authorities on the legislative process have modified their position in this regard in response to jurisprudence, and Committees of the House have occasionally amended headings. See, for example, Sullivan, 4th ed., p. 305; Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, Minutes of Proceedings, May 14, 2008, Meeting No. 32.

[126] This requirement is consistent with Standing Order 79(1) and section 54 of the Constitution Act, 1867. It is worded as follows: “His/Her Excellency the Governor General recommends to the House of Commons the appropriation of public revenue under the circumstances, in the manner and for the purposes set out in a measure entitled [long title of the bill]”. See also Chapter 18, “Financial Procedures”.

[127] Standing Order 79(2).

[128] See, for example, Bill C‑32, Fisheries Act, 2007 (Second Session, Thirty‑Ninth Parliament, 2007‑08).

Top of Page