|
Q-1323
|
Monday, June 15, 2026 |
With regard to grant applications received by the government during the 2025-26 fiscal year: (a) how many and what percentage of grant applications asked if the applicant was (i) a woman, (ii) a visible minority, (iii) aboriginal, (iv) disabled; and (b) which government funding programs requested the applicant to indicate whether they were from any of the four officially recognized employment equity groups in (a)? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1252
|
Tuesday, June 2, 2026 |
With regard to contracts entered into by the government relating to diversity, equity and inclusion services, between June 1, 2025, and June 1, 2026, and broken down by department or agency: (a) what is the total value of such contracts, broken down by type of service provided (policy development, training, guest speaker, fee, etc.); and (b) what are the details of each such contract, including the (i) vendor, (ii) date, (iii) amount or value, (iv) description of the goods or services, (v) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced or competitive bid)? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1249
|
Monday, June 1, 2026 |
With regard to financial assistance provided by the Canadian government for Ukraine, since 2022: (a) how much has been delivered in (i) economic assistance, (ii) humanitarian assistance, (iii) development assistance, (iv) government funding Canada has committed over $25.5 billion in multifaceted assistance for Ukraine, (v) peace and security programs, to date; (b) for each category in (a), what audits or similar types of reviews, if any, have been conducted to ensure that (i) the funding was used as intended, (ii) the government received value for money; and (c) for each audit or review in (b), (i) who conducted the audit, (ii) when was the audit done, (iii) what were the results? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-1238
|
Wednesday, May 27, 2026 |
With regard to the trip by the delegation, including the Prime Minister and others, to China in January 2026: (a) what were the expenses paid for by the government in relation to the member of Parliament for Markham—Unionville's participation in the trip, in total and broken down by type of expense, including transportation, accommodation, meals or per diems, and other expenses; (b) did the government invite anyone or pay for the expenses for any individuals, including family members, to accompany or staff the member of Parliament while on the trip, and, if so, which individuals were on the trip and what were their expenses, in total, and broken down by type of expense; (c) is the government aware of any gifts provided to the member of Parliament for Markham—Unionville or any other delegation member by (i) the Government of the People's Republic of China, (ii) the Chinese Communist Party, (iii) any provincial, municipal, or regional government in China, (iv) any state-owned enterprise, (v) any United Front organization, business, association, foundation, or non-governmental entity, (vi) any individual or organization acting on behalf of any of the above, and, if so, what are the details, including the name of the recipient, provider, gift description, and approximate value of each; (d) is the government aware of any expenses related to the member of Parliament for Markham—Unionville's or any other delegation member's participation in the trip which were paid for by (i) the Government of the People's Republic of China, (ii) the Chinese Communist Party, (iii) any provincial, municipal, or regional government in China, (iv) any state-owned enterprise, (v) any United Front organization, business, association, foundation, or non-governmental entity, (vi) any individual or organization acting on behalf of any of the above, and, if so, what are the details, including the name of the recipient, provider, gift description, and approximate value of each; and (e) what direction did the government provide to delegation members in relation to accepting gifts from, or having expenses paid for, by any of the entities in (c) or (d)? |
Awaiting response |
Monday, September 21, 2026 |
|
Q-905
|
Tuesday, February 24, 2026 |
With regard to Global Affairs Canada's decision to spend $18,619,067 to reopen and retrofit the Canadian consulate in Milan, Italy, into what was described as a climate change "showpiece": (a) what was the (i) original approved budget, (ii) final cost, or most recent cost estimate for the project, if the final cost is not available; (b) what were the expenditures, overall and broken down by type, and by year, since 2020; (c) what specific upgrades, retrofits, technologies, furnishings, art installations, and professional services were included in the total cost; (d) what were the costs associated with the "modified design-build" procurement approach, including the details of all contracts awarded, itemized with the names of contractors and subcontractors, and the value of each contract; (e) what measurable energy efficiency standards, emissions reductions, or environmental certifications were targeted and achieved, and what is the projected payback period for these investments; (f) what analysis was conducted to determine the value-for-money of converting the Milan consulate into a climate change showcase; (g) what was the justification for spending $37,295 on art displays and $6,400 on photography services; (h) what are the details of all contracts related to the costs in (g), including, for each, the (i) vendor, (ii) date, (iii) description of the goods or services provided; (i) what lower-cost alternatives were considered, including reopening the consulate without extensive retrofits or allocating funds to other diplomatic priorities, and, for each alternative, why was it not pursued; (j) what is the total cost of operations and maintenance for the Milan consulate since its reopening in 2023; (k) what are the details of all contracts signed by the government with a value in excess of $50,000 in relation to the consulate, since 2016, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) value, (iii) vendor, (iv) description of the goods or services provided, (v) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced or competitive bid); and (l) for each step of the project, as well as related expenses, what level of ministerial approval, discretion, direction, or oversight was exercised, if any, and what are the details of all briefing notes or approvals sent to the minister or the minister's office, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) sender, (iii) recipient, (iv) type of document, (v) title, (vi) summary? |
Answered |
Monday, April 13, 2026 |
|
Q-897
|
Monday, February 23, 2026 |
With regard to individuals who are current or former officials of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and their agents or proxies, who are suspected of being in, or residing in, Canada, since 2016: (a) what is the total number of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps officials that the government (i) suspects, (ii) has reasonable grounds to believe, (iii) has determined, are living in Canada; (b) how many of the individuals referenced in (a) are currently (i) under investigation, (ii) subject to
an inadmissibility assessment, (iii) subject to enforcement action; (c) how many inadmissibility reports under section 44 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act have been prepared or referred to the Immigration Division in relation to individuals referenced in (a), broken down by inadmissibility ground cited and by year; (d) how many individuals referenced in (a) are or were subject to removal proceedings, and, for
each such case, what is the number that are (i) before the Immigration Division, (ii) before the
Immigration Appeal Division, (iii) before the Federal Court, (iv) stayed or deferred;
(e) how many individuals referenced in (a) have been issued (i) a removal order, including
departure orders, exclusion orders, and deportation orders, (ii) a warrant;
(f) of the individuals referenced in (e), how many have been removed from Canada, broken down by
year; (g) how many temporary resident visas, study permits, work permits, permanent resident visas or electronic travel authorizations have been refused, cancelled or revoked on the basis of suspected Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps affiliation or service, broken down by year; (h) for each department or agency involved, including Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, the Canada Border Services Agency, the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, what resources were dedicated to identifying, investigating and removing individuals referenced in (a), including (i) employees or full-time equivalents, (ii) expenditures, both in total and by type, broken down by program and by year? |
Answered |
Monday, April 13, 2026 |
|
Q-853
|
Monday, February 9, 2026 |
With regard to the measures announced by the Prime Minister on December 27, 2025, in Halifax, providing an additional $2.5 billion commitment for Ukraine, including debt suspensions and loan guarantees to multilateral institutions: (a) what is the precise allocation of the $2.5 billion by category, specifically identifying amounts attributable to (i) International Monetary Fund financing support or capital subscriptions, (ii) Canada's participation in debt service suspension for 2025-26, up to $1.5 billion, (iii) the World Bank loan guarantee of up to $1.3 billion in 2026, (iv) the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development guarantee of up to $322 million, (v) any humanitarian or military components not listed; (b) for each portion in (a), what are the legal and financial instruments being used; (c) what amounts have been disbursed or formally executed to date, and what amounts remain only announced but not yet contracted or guaranteed; (d) which departments, Crown corporations, or international partners are administering each transfer; (e) what are the terms and conditions attached to each loan guarantee or debt suspension, including duration, interest exposure, and contingent liabilities to Canada; (f) what is the government's estimate of the maximum risk to taxpayers should any guaranteed loan default; (g) what mechanisms are in place to track end-use of funds in Ukraine and ensure compliance with Canadian sanctions and anti-fraud requirements; and (h) what reporting will be provided to Parliament on the performance outcomes of these measures? |
Answered |
Monday, April 13, 2026 |
|
Q-852
|
Monday, February 9, 2026 |
With regard to government statistics on the use of Impact of Race and Culture Assessments in criminal sentencing, since 2016, broken down by calendar year: (a) what is the number of offenders who received a sentence reduction, variance, or alternative disposition where an Impact of Race and Culture Assessment was considered by the court; (b) of the cases identified in (a), how many involved convictions for (i) violent offences, (ii) sexual offences, (iii) firearms offences, (iv) trafficking of controlled substances, (v) robberies, (vi) other indictable offences; (c) what was the average and median quantum of sentence reduction attributable to the consideration of an Impact of Race and Culture Assessment; (d) of the offenders identified in (a), what is their immigration status and country of birth, including the number who were (i) Canadian citizens, (ii) permanent residents, (iii) foreign nationals, (iv) individuals without legal immigration status; (e) how many sentencing decisions were appealed by the Public Prosecution Service of Canada or provincial Crowns on the basis that the consideration of an Impact of Race and Culture Assessment resulted in an unduly lenient sentence; and (f) of the cases identified in (a), what criteria or factors documented in the Impact of Race and Culture Assessments were considered and relied upon by the court, including, where ascertainable, categories such as (i) race, (ii) ethnicity, (iii) country of origin, (iv) cultural background, (v) experiences in country of origin, (vi) socio-economic conditions linked to identity, (vii) Indigenous or non-Indigenous status, (viii) immigration status, (ix) other identity-based or background factors, (x) whether any race or culture factor was expressly linked in reasons for sentence reduction? |
Answered |
Monday, April 13, 2026 |
