Skip to main content

CHPC Committee Meeting

Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Minutes of Proceedings

45th Parliament, 1st Session
Meeting 10
Wednesday, October 29, 2025, 4:31 p.m. to 6:27 p.m.
Televised
Presiding
Lisa Hepfner, Chair (Liberal)

Library of Parliament
• Liane Tanguay, Analyst
As an individual
• Michael Geist, Canada Research Chair in Internet and E-Commerce Law, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa
• Véronique Guèvremont, Full Professor, Holder of the UNESCO Chair on the Diversity of Cultural Expressions
• Chip Sutherland, Entertainment Lawyer and Artist Manager
Newsroom Robots Lab
• Nikita Roy, Chief Executive Officer
Press Forward
• Vicky Mochama, Communications Director
Pursuant to Standing Order 108(2) and the motion adopted by the committee on Monday, September 22, 2025, the committee resumed its study of the effects of technological advances in artificial intelligence on the creative industries.

Michael Geist, Véronique Guèvremont, Chip Sutherland, Nikita Roy and Vicky Mochama made statements and answered questions.

The committee proceeded to the consideration of matters related to committee business.

Motion

Rachael Thomas moved, — Given that,

Through the Indigenous Art Centre, the federal government safeguards a collection of more than 5,000 Indigenous artworks of exceptional cultural and artistic value, with an estimated value exceeding $14 million;

More than 130 artworks managed by the Centre have gone missing, according to a troubling audit that highlights widespread mismanagement, weak oversight, and inadequate security;

The committee invite the following witnesses to testify before the committee:

• the director of the Indigenous Art Centre, for no less than two (2) hours

• the authors of the audit report prepared by the Audit and Assurance Services Branch of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, for no less than two (2) hours; and

that the committee report to the House its concern with the audit report.

On motion of David Myles, it was agreed, — That the motion be amended by adding after the words “concern with the audit report” the following: “; and, in accordance with Standing Order 109, the committee requests that the government table a comprehensive response to the report”.

After debate, the question was put on the motion, as amended, and it was agreed to.

The motion, as amended, read as follows:

Given that,

Through the Indigenous Art Centre, the federal government safeguards a collection of more than 5,000 Indigenous artworks of exceptional cultural and artistic value, with an estimated value exceeding $14 million;

More than 130 artworks managed by the Centre have gone missing, according to a troubling audit that highlights widespread mismanagement, weak oversight, and inadequate security;

The committee invite the following witnesses to testify before the committee:

• the Director of the Indigenous Art Centre, for no less than two (2) hours;

• the authors of the audit report prepared by the Audit and Assurance Services Branch of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada, for no less than two (2) hours; and

that the committee report to the House its concern with the audit report and, in accordance with Standing Order 109, the committee requests that the government table a comprehensive response to the report.

At 6:27 p.m., the committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.



Jean-François Pagé
Clerk of the committee