JUST Committee Meeting
Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
Publication Selector by Date
| June | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
29
|
30
|
|||||
| July | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
||
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
||
| August | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|
1
|
2
|
|||||
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
31
|
||||||
| September | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
19
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
|
||
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
||||
| October | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|
1
|
3
|
4
|
||||
|
5
|
6
|
8
|
10
|
11
|
||
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
|
19
|
20
|
22
|
24
|
25
|
||
|
26
|
27
|
29
|
31
|
|||
| November | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|
1
|
||||||
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
7
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
28
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
||||||
| January | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
||||
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
| February | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|
1
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
||
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
24
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
||

Minutes of Proceedings
Larry Brock moved, — That to improve public safety in our communities and to protect Canadians from repeat and violent offenders, the committee (a) immediately prioritize the consideration of Bill C-14, the bail and sentencing reform act and work together to report the bill to the House at the earliest opportunity; (b) sit through the winter adjournment to undertake meaningful consultations with victims, community leaders, police services and associations, and other relevant witnesses; and (c) pause consideration of Bill C-9 to make room on the agenda for Bill C-14.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair declares the motion out of order on the basis that it is not relevant to the clause-by-clause consideration.
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5;
NAYS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4.
The witnesses answered questions.
The committee resumed its clause-by-clause study of the Bill.
The committee resumed clause-by-clause consideration on Clause 4 of the Bill.
“ing, in any public place, a symbol that is principally used by, or principally associated with, a listed entity, as defined in subsection 83.01(1).”
Debate arose thereon.
Larry Brock moved, — That the committee proceed to the consideration of Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing).
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair declares the motion out of order on the basis that it is not relevant to the clause-by-clause consideration.
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5;
NAYS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4.
The debate continued.
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Rhéal Éloi Fortin and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Rhéal Éloi Fortin — 1;
NAYS: Roman Baber, Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Amarjeet Gill, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio, Andrew Lawton, Anna Roberts — 8.
“(b) the Nazi Hakenkreuz or the Nazi double Sig-Rune, also known as”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Anthony Housefather and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Amarjeet Gill, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio, Andrew Lawton — 9;
NAYS: — 0.
(a) by adding after line 3 on page 2 the following:
“(b.1) the communist symbol known as the hammer and sickle; or”
(b) by replacing line 5 on page 2 with the following:
“scribed in paragraph (a), (b) or (b.1) that it is likely to be”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Andrew Lawton and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4;
NAYS: Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5.
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Larry Brock and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4;
NAYS: Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5.
“a symbol described in paragraph (a) or (b).”
Debate arose thereon.
At 4:51 p.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 5:00 p.m., the meeting resumed.
The debate continued.
At 5:17 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 115(5), the meeting was suspended.
At 6:29 p.m., the meeting resumed.
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Roman Baber and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Amarjeet Gill, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio, Andrew Lawton — 9;
NAYS: — 0.
At 6:35 p.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 6:42 p.m., the meeting resumed.
(a) by adding after line 12 on page 2 the following:
“(1.1) Paragraph 319(3)(b) of the Act is repealed.
(1.2) Paragraph 319(3.1)(b) of the Act is repealed.”
(b) by replacing line 19 on page 2 with the following:
“journalism, education or art, that is not con‐”
After debate, the question was put on the amendment of Rhéal Éloi Fortin and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5;
NAYS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4.
“(6.1) Nothing in this section is to be interpreted or applied so as to interfere with the freedom of expression or the freedom of religion.”
Debate arose thereon.
At 7:45 p.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 8:06 p.m., the meeting resumed.
The debate continued.
At 9:50 p.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 10:02 p.m., the meeting resumed.
The debate continued.
Andrew Lawton moved, — That the committee proceed to the consideration of Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing).
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4;
NAYS: Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5.
The debate continued.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair declares that Mr. Jivani used unparliamentary language.
Whereupon, Andrew Lawton appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5;
NAYS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4.
The debate continued.
At 11:26 p.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 8:36 a.m., on Thursday, December 11, 2025, the meeting resumed.
The witnesses answered questions.
The committee resumed its clause-by-clause study of the Bill.
The committee resumed clause-by-clause consideration on Clause 4 of the Bill.
“(6.1) Nothing in this section is to be interpreted or applied so as to interfere with the freedom of expression or the freedom of religion.”
Andrew Lawton moved, — That the committee proceed to the consideration of Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing).
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4;
NAYS: Maggie Chi, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5.
The debate continued.
Leslyn Lewis moved, — That the committee proceed to the consideration of Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing).
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair declares that, since the same motion had already been rejected, an identical dilatory motion could not be proposed again.
Whereupon, Andrew Lawton appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5;
NAYS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4.
Larry Brock moved, — That the amendment be amended by replacing the words “freedom of expression or the freedom of religion” with the words:
“(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.”.
Debate arose thereon.
At 9:50 a.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 10:23 a.m., the meeting resumed.
Andrew Lawton moved, — That the committee proceed to the consideration of Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing).
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair declares that, since the same motion had already been rejected, an identical dilatory motion could not be proposed again.
Whereupon, Larry Brock appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5;
NAYS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4.
The debate continued.
Jacob Mantle moved, — That, by unanimous consent, the committee proceed to the consideration of Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing).
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair declares that M.P. Jacob Mantle is neither a member of the committee nor a substitute, and therefore cannot propose a motion.
Whereupon, Andrew Lawton appealed the decision of the Chair.
The question: "Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?" was put and the decision was sustained on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Sima Acan, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5;
NAYS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4.
At 10:31 a.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 10:34 a.m., the meeting resumed.
The debate continued.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair declares that only committee members or their substitutes may raise points of order.
Larry Brock moved, — That, to improve public safety in our communities and to protect Canadians from repeat and violent offenders, the committee, a) immediately prioritize the consideration of Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing) and work together to report the bill to the House at the earliest opportunity, b) sit through the winter adjournment to undertake meaningful consultations with victims, community leaders, police services and associations and other relevant witnesses, and c) pause consideration of Bill C-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places) to make room on the agenda for Bill C-14.
RULING BY THE CHAIR
The Chair declares that it is not possible to move a point of order.
At 10:53 a.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 10:54 a.m., the meeting resumed.
The debate continued.
At 11:18 a.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 11:29 a.m., the meeting resumed.
The debate continued.
At 12:05 p.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 12:21 p.m., the meeting resumed.
The debate continued.
At 1:18 p.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 1:32 p.m., the meeting resumed.
The debate continued.
At 1:56 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 115(5), the meeting was suspended.
At 4:06 p.m., the meeting resumed.
The debate continued.
At 4:48 p.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 4:55 p.m., the meeting resumed.
The debate continued.
At 5:08 p.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 11:17 a.m., on Monday, January 26, 2026, the meeting resumed.
The witnesses answered questions.
The committee resumed its clause-by-clause study of the Bill.
The committee resumed clause-by-clause consideration on Clause 4 of the Bill.
“(6.1) Nothing in this section is to be interpreted or applied so as to interfere with the freedom of expression or the freedom of religion.”
The committee resumed consideration of the subamendment of Larry Brock, — That the amendment be amended by replacing the words “freedom of expression or the freedom of religion” with the words:
“(a) freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.”.
The debate continued.
Larry Brock moved, — That the committee proceed to the consideration of Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing), immediately.
At 12:01 p.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 12:18 p.m., the meeting resumed.
The question was put on the motion and it was negatived on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Amarjeet Gill, Andrew Lawton — 4;
NAYS: Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio — 5.
The debate continued.
By unanimous consent, Patricia Lattanzio moved, — That the committee pause clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places); that the committee allocate three meetings to the consideration of Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing), beginning at its next meeting; that the committee not adjourn its third meeting on Bill C-14 until clause-by-clause consideration of the bill is complete; and that at the meeting following the completion of clause-by-clause of Bill C-14, the committee resume clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-9.
Debate arose thereon.
Andrew Lawton moved, — That the motion be amended by adding between the words “beginning at its next meeting” and “that the committee not adjourn its third meeting on Bill C-14 until clause-by-clause consideration of the bill is complete” the following: “and that one of those meetings be the appearance of the Minister of Justice”.
At 12:24 p.m., the meeting was suspended.
At 12:33 p.m., the meeting resumed.
The question was put on the amendment of Andrew Lawton and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Rhéal Éloi Fortin, Amarjeet Gill, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio, Andrew Lawton — 9;
NAYS: — 0.
After debate, the question was put on the motion, as amended, and it was agreed to on the following recorded division:
YEAS: Roman Baber, Larry Brock, Wade Chang, Anju Dhillon, Amarjeet Gill, Anthony Housefather, Patricia Lattanzio, Andrew Lawton — 8;
NAYS: Rhéal Éloi Fortin — 1.
The motion, as amended, read as follows:
That the committee pause clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-9, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (hate propaganda, hate crime and access to religious or cultural places); that the committee allocate three meetings to the consideration of Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing), beginning at its next meeting; and that one of those meetings be the appearance of the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada; that the committee not adjourn its third meeting on Bill C-14 until clause-by-clause consideration of the bill is complete; and that at the meeting following the completion of clause-by-clause of Bill C-14, the committee resume clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-9.
It was agreed, — That the members of the committee submit all of their proposed amendments to Bill C-14, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act (bail and sentencing) to the clerk no later than noon on Monday, February 2, 2026.
At 12:36 p.m., the committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.