Skip to main content
Start of content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication
PDF

Notice Paper

No. 123

Tuesday, June 22, 2021

10:00 a.m.

Introduction of Government Bills
June 21, 2021 — The Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness — Bill entitled “An Act establishing the Public Complaints and Review Commission and amending certain Acts and statutory instruments”.
June 21, 2021 — The Minister of Justice — Bill entitled “An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Canadian Human Rights Act and to make related amendments to another Act (hate propaganda, hate crimes and hate speech) ”.

Introduction of Private Members' Bills
June 21, 2021 — Mr. MacGregor (Cowichan—Malahat—Langford) — Bill entitled “An Act to establish a national strategy on brain injuries”.

Notices of Motions (Routine Proceedings)
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Aboultaif (Edmonton Manning) — That the ninth report of the Standing Committee on International Trade, presented on Friday, June 18, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Redekopp (Saskatoon West) — That the seventh report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 18, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Nater (Perth—Wellington) — That the 18th report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Friday, June 18, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Van Popta (Langley—Aldergrove) — That the sixth report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. McLean (Calgary Centre) — That the sixth report of the Standing Committee on Natural Resources, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mrs. Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — That the 20th report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland) — That the sixth report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mrs. Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — That the 21st report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mrs. Block (Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek) — That the 22nd report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend) — That the seventh report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 18, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable) — That the 20th report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable) — That the 21st report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Berthold (Mégantic—L'Érable) — That the 22nd report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That the 20th report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That the 21st report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Webber (Calgary Confederation) — That the 22nd report of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Kurek (Battle River—Crowfoot) — That the sixth report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mrs. Vecchio (Elgin—Middlesex—London) — That the 18th report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Friday, June 18, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Kent (Thornhill) — That the 18th report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Friday, June 18, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Motz (Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner) — That the sixth report of the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Lukiwski (Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan) — That the 18th report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, presented on Friday, June 18, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Barrett (Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes) — That the third report of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics, presented on Thursday, June 17, 2021, be concurred in.
June 21, 2021 — Mr. Albas (Central Okanagan—Similkameen—Nicola) — That the seventh report of the Standing Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development, presented on Friday, June 18, 2021, be concurred in.

Questions
Q-8532 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Ruff (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound) — With regard to the Order in Council SOR/2020-96 published on May 1, 2020, whereas it states that “the newly prescribed firearms are primarily designed for military or paramilitary purposes” and as the Minister of Public Safety has re-stated this in the House of Commons of the over 1,500 newly prohibited firearms on numerous occasions: (a) which specific models that were prohibited on May 1, 2020, or since have been or are still in use by the Canadian Armed Forces and (b) which specific models prohibited on May 1, 2020, or since are in use by any national military in world?
Q-8542 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Motz (Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner) — With regard to all the advance payments made to suppliers since January 2020: how many of these contracts were signed with foreign companies and what are the details, including the (i) date, (ii) description of the goods or services, including the volume, (iii) final amount, (iv) vendor, (v) country of the vendor?
Q-8552 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Motz (Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner) — With regard to all contracts that were awarded by the government since January 2020: how many of these contracts were signed without an integrity verification prior to the signature and what are the details, including the (i) date, (ii) description of the goods or services, including the volume, (iii) final amount, (iv) vendor, (v) country of the vendor?
Q-8562 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Motz (Medicine Hat—Cardston—Warner) — With regard to all contracts signed by the government for the Visitors Welcome Center project: (a) how many contracts have been awarded; and (b) what are the details of each contract, including the (i) date, (ii) description of the goods or services, including the volume, (iii) final amount, (iv) vendor, (v) country of the vendor?
Q-8572 — June 21, 2021 — Ms. Gazan (Winnipeg Centre) — With regard to government funding for fiscal years 2019-20 and 2020-21, allocated within the constituency of Winnipeg Centre: what is the total funding amount, broken down by (i) fiscal year, (ii) department or agency, (iii) initiative, (iv) amount?
Q-8582 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Bachrach (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — With regard to the proposed changes to the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB), including paying the remaining eight weeks of the extended CRB at a lower amount of $300 per week claimed: (a) what are the details, including the conclusions, of any studies, analyses, estimates or projections of the impact of the decision to reduce the CRB amount; (b) what are the projections of the impact this may have on gig workers, including (i) independent contractors, (ii) online platform workers, (iii) contract firm workers, (iv) on-call workers, and temporary workers; (c) what are the conclusions of the projections in (b); (d) what are the projected impacts on low-income workers; (e) what are the conclusions of the projections in (d); and (f) was a gender analysis conducted as part of this decision, and, if so, what are the conclusions?
Q-8592 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Masse (Windsor West) — With regard to the total amount of government funding allocated within the constituencies of Windsor West, Essex, and Windsor-Tecumseh since the fiscal year 2018-19, up to and including the current fiscal year: what is the total amount of funding, broken down by (i) department or agency, (ii) initiative, (iii) amount?
Q-8602 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Masse (Windsor West) — With regard to the Universal Broadband Fund, broken down by province and territory: (a) how many applications for funding have been received; (b) of the applications in (a), how many have been approved; (c) what is the total amount distributed through the fund since its official launch; (d) how many applications have been classified as coming from a local government district; and (e) what are the details for all funds awarded, including (i) the recipient, (ii) the amount, (iii) the location, (iv) the project description or summary, (v) how much local employment has been created?
Q-8612 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Ruff (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound) — With regard to the government’s Canada Emergency Business Account (CEBA) pandemic support program for businesses: (a) Did the government consult with financial institutions to ensure they had the capacity to support the ongoing changes or expansion to the program before announcing these changes, and if so, what are the details, including dates of the consultation; (b) how many formal complaints were launched into the program and what system or process is in place to deal with complaints; (c) how many applicants were denied due to application issues and what was the average success rate of applicants; (d) between December 4, 2020 and June 15, 202, how many inquires did the CEBA call centre receive, broken down by month and daily average; (e) what was the (i) shortest wait time, (ii) longest wait time, (iii) average wait time on the CEBA Call Centre inquires line; (f) how many and what percentage of inquiries were considered resolved during the initial phone to the CEBA call centre; and (g) What specific information is the CEBA call centre able to access from the processing department?
Q-8622 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge) — With regard to the various pandemic support loan programs, including the Canada Emergency Business Account, the Regional Relief and Recovery Fund, the Highly Affected Sectors Credit Availability Program, and other loan guarantee programs available through the Business Development Bank of Canada and Export Development Canada: (a) what is the median debt taken on by small businesses throughout Canada; (b) what is the maximum debt taken on by a small business; (c) what percentage of the debt owed to Canada under these programs has already been repaid; (d) what percentage of the debt owed to Canada under these programs is already in default; and (e) what is the median annual debt servicing cost for small businesses?
Q-8632 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Kelly (Calgary Rocky Ridge) — With regard to the Canada Emergency Business Account remediation mechanisms: (a) how many applicants for the $20,000 expansion were rejected based on providing incomplete or erroneous information; (b) how many of the applicants in (a) have since been able to correct their applications using the remediation mechanisms; (c) how many of the applicants in (a) are on track to or have already missed the deadline for correcting their applications; (d) how many of the applicants in (c) did so due to the late and uneven deployment of the mechanisms on an institution by institution basis; and (e) when did the last institution to deploy the remediation mechanisms do so?
Q-8642 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Ruff (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound) — With regards to long-term funding to the Centre for Equitable Library Access (CELA) and the National Network for Equitable Library Service (NNELS) and transitions to an industry-based solution: (a) what data does the government have to show the transition cost of industry to take over the role that CELA and NNELS currently play in the industry providing materials for Canadians with print disabilities; (b) does the government have a commitment from industry that they are willing to make the necessary investments to take over this role; (c) knowing the cost of the transition, is the government committing to funding the transition to an industry-led solution if industry is unwilling to commit to funding the transition; and (d) will the government commit to supporting smaller publishers not able to make this transition?

Notices of Motions for the Production of Papers

Business of Supply

Government Business

Private Members' Notices of Motions
M-94 — June 21, 2021 — Mr. Julian (New Westminster—Burnaby) — That:
the House recognize that,
(i) the International Energy Agency released a special report demonstrating that there is no longer any need to invest in or construct new fossil fuel supply projects, if we're to avoid catastrophic climate change,
(ii) the Canada Energy Regulator projects that if Canada strengthens its climate policies to cut more greenhouse gas emissions, the Trans Mountain expansion will not be needed,
(iii) an order stopping tree cutting and grass mowing across the entire Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project was issued by the Canada Energy Regulator, the agency that enforces safety and environmental guidelines for pipeline projects across Canada,
(iv) a recent report from the Canada Energy Regulator and the Parliamentary Budget Officer show that in almost all scenarios the Trans Mountain expansion project will not be financially viable,
(v) this project does not have the consent of all the First Nations whose unceded lands, territories or other resources would be affected by the Trans Mountain expansion project,
(vi) the pipeline project puts our communities, environment, ecosystems, coastlines, tourism and marine industries at risk,
(vii) the pipeline project undermines Canada's climate commitments to the Paris Agreement and puts the brakes on an environmental transition and the creation of quality jobs in a clean energy industry,
(viii) the cost of the Trans Mountain expansion project has risen by 70% to $12.6 billion, putting Canadian taxpayers' money, our economy and new jobs creation at risk; and
in the opinion of the House, the government should immediately stop the construction of the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion project and instead, invest in a Green New Deal for Canada.

Private Members' Business
S-205 — May 13, 2021 — Ms. Zann (Cumberland—Colchester) — Second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage of Bill S-205, An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act (Parliamentary Visual Artist Laureate).
2 Response requested within 45 days
Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page