Skip to main content Start of content

House Publications

The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

Tuesday, March 3, 2009 (No. 22)


Report Stage of Bills

Bill C-10
An Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on January 27, 2009 and related fiscal measures

Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(5), the Speaker selected and grouped for debate the following motions:

      Group No. 1 -- Motions Nos. 1 to 6 and 66 to 86.
      Group No. 2 -- Motions Nos. 7 to 31.
      Group No. 3 -- Motions Nos. 32 to 65.
Statement and selection by Speaker — see Debates of February 27, 2009.

Deferred Recorded Divisions

Group No. 1
Motion No. 1 -- Question put separately.
Motion No. 2 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 3 to 6.
Motion No. 66 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 67 to 86.
Motion No. 1 — March 2, 2009 — Deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel), seconded by Mr. Malo (Verchères—Les Patriotes), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 6.
Motion No. 2 — March 2, 2009 — Deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel), seconded by Mr. Malo (Verchères—Les Patriotes), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 295.
Motion No. 3 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel), seconded by Mr. Malo (Verchères—Les Patriotes), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 296.
Motion No. 4 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel), seconded by Mr. Malo (Verchères—Les Patriotes), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 297.
Motion No. 5 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel), seconded by Mr. Malo (Verchères—Les Patriotes), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 298.
Motion No. 6 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel), seconded by Mr. Malo (Verchères—Les Patriotes), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 299.
Motion No. 66 — March 2, 2009 — Deferred recorded division on the motion of Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 445.
Motion No. 67 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 446.
Motion No. 68 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 447.
Motion No. 69 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 448.
Motion No. 70 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 449.
Motion No. 71 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 450.
Motion No. 72 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 451.
Motion No. 73 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 452.
Motion No. 74 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 453.
Motion No. 75 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 454.
Motion No. 76 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 455.
Motion No. 77 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 456.
Motion No. 78 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 457.
Motion No. 79 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 458.
Motion No. 80 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 459.
Motion No. 81 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 460.
Motion No. 82 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 461.
Motion No. 83 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 462.
Motion No. 84 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 463.
Motion No. 85 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 464.
Motion No. 86 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 465.

Resuming Debate

Group No. 2
Motion No. 7 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 8 to 31.
Motion No. 7 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 317.
Motion No. 8 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 318.
Motion No. 9 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 319.
Motion No. 10 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 320.
Motion No. 11 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 321.
Motion No. 12 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 322.
Motion No. 13 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 323.
Motion No. 14 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 324.
Motion No. 15 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 325.
Motion No. 16 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 326.
Motion No. 17 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 327.
Motion No. 18 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 328.
Motion No. 19 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 329.
Motion No. 20 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 330.
Motion No. 21 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 331.
Motion No. 22 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 332.
Motion No. 23 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 333.
Motion No. 24 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 334.
Motion No. 25 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 335.
Motion No. 26 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 336.
Motion No. 27 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 337.
Motion No. 28 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 338.
Motion No. 29 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 339.
Motion No. 30 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 340.
Motion No. 31 — March 2, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont), seconded by Ms. Duncan (Edmonton—Strathcona), — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 341.

Notices of Motions

Group No. 3
Motion No. 32 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 33 to 42.
Motion No. 43 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 44 to 52.
Motion No. 53 -- Question put separately. Its vote also applies to Motions Nos. 54 to 65.
Motion No. 32 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 358.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 33 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 359.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 34 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 360.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 35 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 361.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 36 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 362.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 37 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 363.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 38 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 364.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 39 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 365.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 40 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 366.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 41 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 367.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 42 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 368.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 43 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 383.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain) — February 25, 2009
Motion No. 44 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 384.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain) — February 25, 2009
Motion No. 45 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 385.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain) — February 25, 2009
Motion No. 46 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 386.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain) — February 25, 2009
Motion No. 47 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 387.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain) — February 25, 2009
Motion No. 48 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 388.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain) — February 25, 2009
Motion No. 49 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 389.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain) — February 25, 2009
Motion No. 50 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 390.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain) — February 25, 2009
Motion No. 51 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 391.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain) — February 25, 2009
Motion No. 52 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Laframboise (Argenteuil—Papineau—Mirabel) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 392.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Laforest (Saint-Maurice—Champlain) — February 25, 2009
Motion No. 53 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 394.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 54 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 395.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 55 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 396.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 56 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 397.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 57 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 398.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 58 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 399.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 59 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 400.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 60 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 401.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 61 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 402.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 62 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 403.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 63 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 404.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 64 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 405.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009
Motion No. 65 — February 25, 2009 — Mr. Mulcair (Outremont) — That Bill C-10 be amended by deleting Clause 406.
Pursuant to Standing Order 76.1(2), notice also received from:
Mr. Dewar (Ottawa Centre) — February 26, 2009