Overview of Child Welfare for those Provinces Implementing the Enhanced Prevention Framework Approach (PEI, NS, QC, SK, AB)APPENDIX A
|
Prince
Edward Island (PEI) |
Nova
Scotia (NS) |
Québec
(QC) |
Saskatchewan (SK) |
Alberta (AB) |
OVERVIEW
OF CHILD WELFARE |
The
Prince Edward Island[1] Minister of Social Services and Seniors has the overall responsibility for
the administration of child welfare services including child protection. The
service delivery system consists of two administrative units with five
offices located in communities across the province.
Child
protection services are delivered by provincial social workers in child
protection teams under the supervision of the Director of Child Welfare. |
The
Nova Scotia[2] Department of Community Services is responsible for the delivery of child
welfare services and develops policies and programs, ensuring that services
are delivered in compliance with legislation, and provides funding to the independent
agencies.
20
child welfare agencies make up the province’s service delivery system. Six
are provincial government district offices and five are independent agencies,
including the Mi’kmaw Family and Children’s Services
Agency,
which provides services to Aboriginal families in NS. |
The
Québec[3] Ministère de la Famille et des Aînés of Quebec has the overall responsibility
for the administration of the Youth Protection Act and for mandatory child
protection services. Parents may utilize legislation in the Health and Social
Services Act to place children voluntarily.
Child
welfare services are provided by “youth centres” (Centres jeunesse) in 18
administrative regions across the province. |
The
Saskatchewan[4] Ministry of Social Services oversees the quality and delivery of child
welfare services.
The
service delivery system consists of three provincial regions which have
offices located in 22 communities, staffed by provincial social workers. |
The
Alberta[5] Ministry of Children’s Services oversees the quality and delivery of child intervention
services provided by 10 regional Child and Family Service Authorities, which
are staffed by provincial caseworkers and directed by community-based boards
of directors.
Each
Authority is managed by a Chief Executive Officer and mandated to provide a
range of specialized services to ensure the safety and well-being of young people. |
ROLE
OF CHILD WELFARE SERVICE PROVIDERS |
The
role of Child protection workers is to ensure that vulnerable children are protected
within the contexts of their own families, whenever possible.
Services
offered include: assessments; crisis intervention; counselling; and services
to prevent children from being harmed.
The
Director of Child Welfare is able to take custody and guardianship of
children, and may place them in the care of a member of the extended family
or other Caregiver when risk factors in the home environment may require the
removal of the children on a temporary or permanent basis.
Staff
of the Child and Family Services Division provide for adoptions, various
forms of foster care and residential care for children in need of protection,
in keeping with the legislation and the best interests of the children
involved. |
The
role of child welfare agencies and district offices
is
to act in the best interests of children by:
-supervising
children assigned to agency supervision under Children and Family Services Act;
-providing
comprehensive planning for children in permanent care;
-providing
families with supports and services to promote their health and integrity;
-working
with community social services to prevent or alleviate the personal, social
or economic conditions that might place children and families in situations
in which they are risk of abuse or neglect; and
-providing
adoption services and placing children for adoption. |
Each
youth centre is managed by a Director of Youth Protection and is mandated to
provide a range of specialized services to ensure the safety and well-being of
young people under the age of 18.
In
addition to protection services, youth centres provide family counselling,
legal expertise in custody disputes, adoption referrals and birth-parent
searches.
Services
are also provided for young
people and their families experiencing serious difficulties and for young
mothers who are experiencing severe problems of adaptation. |
The
role of Saskatchewan’s child welfare workers and First Nations Child and
Family Service agencies is to act in the best interests of children by:
-protecting
children from harm;
-investigating
allegations or evidence that children may be in need of protection;
-providing
care for children for whom it is not safe to live at home;
-supervising
children assigned to agency supervision under the Child and Family Services
Act;
-providing
comprehensive planning for children in permanent care;
-providing
families with supports and services to promote their health and integrity and
their families; and
-providing
adoption services and placing children for adoption. |
In
addition to child intervention, the Authorities provide a range of family
support services, including adoption arrangements and family support to children
with disabilities.
In
addition to overseeing service delivery and developing standards, policies
and practices, the Ministry funds, monitors and assesses the Authorities and
provides administrative, financial management, legal, and information technology
services.
Each
Authority can develop more detailed directives for uniquely
regional
practices, providing that they complement provincial policy. |
PROVISIONS
FOR ABORIGINAL CHILDREN |
INAC
provides funding in PEI to the Mi’Kmaq Confederacy of Prince Edward Island
(MCPEI). Although PEI does not have a delegated First Nations child and
family service agency, the province’s two First Nation bands have formed MCPEI,
a joint organization which provides culturally appropriate family and
community services to Aboriginal families with funding from the province and INAC.
Aboriginal
children living on reserves receive mandated child protection services from provincial
social workers, who collaborate with the Mi’Kmaq Family Support Program of
MCPEI to meet the needs of First Nations band children in a culturally
appropriate manner.
If
a child is believed to be an Aboriginal child, the Director of Child Welfare
is required by the Child Protection Act to notify the band prior to a
protection hearing before the courts, and to consult with the band in developing
a plan of care for the child. |
INAC
provides funding for the Mi’kmaw Family and Children’s Services of Nova
Scotia, which provides services to First Nations people on reserves
throughout the province and is able to continue services for a three month
period if a family moves to an off reserve location. After that time, the
case is transferred to the local jurisdiction if a longer intervention is
required.
The
Mi’kmaw agency also provides culturally appropriate service to approximately
60 Status and Non-Status Indian, Métis and Inuit children who have been
transferred into its care and custody from other agencies.
Before
commencing child welfare or adoption proceedings with an Aboriginal child,
notification must be given to this agency. |
INAC
provides funding to 15 First Nations Child and Family Services agencies to
provide Child and Family Services including child protection services on
reserves. Three of these recipients are the provincial Centres jeunesse.
When
applying the Youth Protection Act to Aboriginal children, youth, and
families, the provincial government may enter into an agreement with
Aboriginal groups to establish a special youth protection program for
Aboriginal children whose security or development may be considered to be in danger.
These
agreements specify the persons or authorities who will be entrusted with exercising
the responsibilities normally assigned to the Director of Youth Protection. |
INAC
provides funding for 18 First Nations Child and Family Services agencies,
delegated by the province to provide child protection services to children and
families on reserves
Most
First Nations families living on reserve in Saskatchewan receive services
through delegated First Nations agencies.
First
Nations people living off reserve receive intervention services through the
provincial Ministry of Social Services office in their region.
If
a child is an Indian under the Indian Act, the band to which the child belongs
must be notified and involved in any court procedures.
If
out-of–home care is necessary, every effort is made to place Aboriginal
children with an extended family member, a member of their band or tribe, or
another Aboriginal family. |
INAC
provides funding for 18 First Nations Agencies delegated by the Province to
provide child intervention services to children and families on most
reserves in Alberta.
Most
First Nation families living on reserves in Alberta receive services
through the aforementioned delegated First Nations agencies.
There
are also 10 regional Child and Family Service Authorities which are
responsible for providing intervention services to First Nations children and
families living off reserves, all of which have culturally sensitive
practice guidelines.
There
are six First Nations that do not have a delegated agency and receive their services
from the nearest of the 10 regional Child and Family Service Authorities. The province bills INAC through the Alberta/Canada Administration
Reform agreement for those services.
In
some circumstances, Métis and First Nations children living away from their
community or on or off reserve are entitled to have a Métis or First Nations
individual designated by their community or band involved as a resource in
case planning. |
COMPARISON OF PROVINCIAL AND INAC FUNDING FOR
FIRST NATIONS CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES AGENCIESAPPENDIX B
PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
The figures
provided below under the INAC formula are based on the costing model developed
in 2008. The provincial comparison is as of this time period.
Salaries |
INAC Formula |
Provincial[6] |
Director |
$72,560 |
$72,560 |
Administrative Support |
$40,492 |
$40,492 |
HR
Administrator |
$41,612 |
$41,612 |
Financial Support |
$52,807 |
$52,807 |
Social
Workers – protection |
$52,807 |
$52,807 |
Social
Workers – prevention |
$52,807 |
$52,807 |
Supervisors |
$65,306 |
$65,306 |
Employee
benefits |
20.45% of salaries |
15-18% of salaries |
Staffing
Ratios
To follow
pending permission from the provinces to release the information |
|
|
Information
is publicly available
NOVA SCOTIA
The figures
provided below under the INAC formula are based on the costing model developed
in the summer of 2007. The provincial comparison is as of this time period.
Salaries |
INAC Formula |
Provincial[7] Range/Classifications |
Executive Director |
$77,137 |
$64,200-$83,500
(MCP 24) |
Administrative Support |
$35,334 |
$29,902- $36,838
(CL 14-18) |
HR
Administrator |
$41,612 |
N/A in province |
Financial Support |
$61,730 |
$52,700-$65,900
(MCP 17) |
Social
Workers - protection |
$55,031 |
$40,763-$63,182
(PR 8-14) |
Social
Workers - prevention |
$55,031 |
$40,763-$63,182
(PR 8-14) |
Supervisors |
$65,979 |
$56,056-$68,568
(PR 16) |
Director- Direct delivery |
$67,819 |
$55,700-$72,400
(MCP 20) |
Employee
benefits |
20.45% of salaries |
17.5% of salaries |
Staffing
Ratios
To follow
pending permission from the provinces to release the information |
|
|
Information
is publicly available
QUEBEC
The figures
provided below under the INAC formula are based on the costing model developed
in the summer of 2007. The provincial comparison is as of this time period.
Salaries |
INAC Formula |
Provincial[8] |
Executive Director |
$80,000 |
N/A |
Administrative Support |
$33,125 |
$31,226-$36,427 |
HR
Administrator |
$39,300 |
N/A |
Financial Support |
$51,000 |
N/A |
Social
Workers – protection |
$56,502 |
$52,779- $57,796 |
Social
Workers – prevention |
$56,502 |
$52,779- $57,796 |
Supervisors |
$69,340 |
$66,648- $72,141 |
Employee
Benefits |
26.4% |
26.07-29.07% % |
Staffing
Ratios
To follow
pending permission from the provinces to release the information |
|
|
Information
is publicly available
SASKATCHEWAN
The figures
provided below under the INAC formula are based on the costing model developed
in the summer of 2007. The provincial comparison is as of this time period.
Salaries |
INAC Formula |
Provincial[9] |
Executive Director |
$77,000 |
$67,452-$96,444
Level 7-Level 8 |
Administrative Support |
$36,150 |
$30,854-$38,664
Level 4 |
HR
Administrator |
$39,300 |
N/A |
Financial Support |
$51,000 |
N/A |
Social
Workers - protection |
$53,950 |
$47,883-$60,004
Level 9 |
Social
Workers - prevention |
$53,950 |
$47,883-$60,004
Level 9 |
Supervisors |
$59,350 |
$52,672-$66,007
Level 10 |
Employee
Benefits |
20.45% |
20.1% |
Staffing
Ratios
To follow
pending permission from the provinces to release the information |
|
|
Information
is publicly available
ALBERTA
The figures
provided below under the INAC formula are based on the costing model developed
in the summer of 2006. The provincial comparison is as of this time period.
Salaries |
INAC Formula |
Provincial[10] |
Executive Director |
$77,000 |
N/A |
Administrative Support |
$36,000 |
N/A |
HR
Administrator |
$39,300 |
N/A |
Financial Support |
$51,000 |
N/A |
Social
Workers - protection |
$58,100 |
$58,100
HSW 4-HSW 6 |
Social
Workers - prevention |
$58,100 |
$58,100
HSW 4-HSW 6 |
Supervisors |
$65,500 |
$65,500
HSW 7 |
Employee
Benefits |
20.45% |
20.0% |
Staffing
Ratios-
To follow
pending permission from the provinces to release the information |
|
|
Information
is publicly available
AUDITOR GENERAL CHAPTER 4 – ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS UPDATE TABLED ON MAY 8, 2008
REPORT TO THE AUDIT COMMITTEE - AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2009
FIRST NATIONS CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES PROGRAM
OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR
GENERAL REPORT – MAY 2008 – CHAPTER 4 – FIRST NATIONS CHILD AND FAMILY
SERVICES PROGRAM
EDUCATION AND SOCIAL
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS AND PARTNERSHIPS – SOCIAL POLICY AND PROGRAMS BRANCH |
PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS |
ACTION PLAN |
EXPECTED COMPLETION DATE |
PROGRAM RESPONSE |
4.26 Indian and
Northern Affairs Canada, in cooperation with provinces and First Nations
agencies, should:
* define what is meant by
services that are reasonably comparable,
* define its expectations
for culturally appropriate services and standards, and implement this
definition and these expectations into the program. (4.17–4.25) |
INAC to ensure
that its authorities reflect reasonably comparable and culturally appropriate
services
In addition,
INAC will develop a principle based on historical and provincial/FN
understanding of what is deemed as culturally appropriate services.
INAC to ensure
that the principle is reflected in Tripartite Frameworks developed under the
Enhanced Prevention Focused Approach.
INAC to ensure
that the principle is communicated to Regional Offices, First Nations and
Provinces (i.e. updating the FNCFS Program Manual) |
01/04/2007
Ongoing
30/06/2010 |
Status: Completed
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC updated its
authorities for the Child and Family Services program in April 2007. The
update included a broader and more
culturally appropriate range of placement options, including kinship care (care provided by extended family members), post adoption subsidies (monthly payments to the adoptive parents) and supports (including
counselling services and special needs support for children with
disabilities) to encourage permanent placement for children.
____________________________________
Update/Rationale
as of 30/09/2009:
The principle on culturally appropriate services was
developed and submitted as part of the government’s response to the
recommendations of the Public Accounts Committee. Frameworks and business
plans being developed continue to include culturally appropriate services.
Status: In progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC will
develop a principle on culturally appropriate services as a specific definition would depend on the
interpretation of various First Nations, based upon their specific and unique
community circumstances and needs. Specific culturally appropriate services
are included in both the framework documents and the business plans which
form the basis of the Enhanced Prevention Focused Approach in the
transitioned regions. INAC will provide the principle in its response to the
recommendations of the Public Accounts Committee by July 2009.
______________________________________
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
The tripartite frameworks in Quebec and Prince Edward Island clearly describe expectations on culturally appropriate services as
well as reasonable comparability to provincial services.
Status: In progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
The tripartite
frameworks in Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Nova Scotia clearly describe
expectations on culturally appropriate services as well as reasonable
comparability to provincial services.
_____________________________________
Update/Rationale as of 31/09/2009:
The principle will be included in the revised and updated
National FNCFS Manual for which the anticipated
completion date is June 30, 2010.
Status: In progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
Once the principle on
culturally appropriate services is developed, it will be communicated to
Regional Offices, First Nations, and Provinces. |
4.32 Indian and Northern Affairs Canada should ensure
that it has up-to-date agreements with the provinces and with First Nations
agencies in place. As a minimum, these agreements should consistently
define who is responsible for providing the child welfare services required
under provincial legislation, and what services will be provided. (4.27–4.31) |
INAC to ensure that
agreements with FNCFS agencies include requirements for Business Plans, or
Work Plans as appropriate (whether they are under Enhanced Prevention Focused
Approach or still need to transition), that clearly outline roles,
responsibility for providing child welfare services required under provincial
legislation, and services provided.
INAC to ensure that Work
Plan and Business Plan reporting formats are incorporated into the 2008-2009
First Nations National Reporting Guide that is utilized by INAC to guide
First Nations recipients on reporting. |
31/03/2010 |
Update/Rationale as of 31/09/2009:
Quebec and Prince Edward Island are
now parties to tripartite accountability frameworks. Nova Scotia now has a
signed tripartite agreement. FNCFS programs
who are not yet delivering the Enhanced Prevention Focused Approach are
required to submit Work Plans for fiscal year funding in 2010/11.
Status: In progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
Alberta, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan, are already party to
tripartite accountability frameworks with Provinces and INAC which require
Business Plans to access the Enhanced Prevention funding. In addition to
tripartite framework, the FNCFS agency in Nova Scotia has a funding agreement
with the province as do the agencies in New Brunswick, Newfoundland, Prince Edward Island, and Yukon who also have agreements with their respective
province/territory that outline the respective roles and responsibilities of
the parties. We will work with the remaining provinces to develop similar
agreements that specify roles and responsibilities.
Agencies who are not yet
delivering the Enhanced Prevention Focused approach have begun developing
Work Plans as recommended for fiscal year 2009/10 and will be required to
submit Work Plans for fiscal year funding in 2010/11.
Update/Rationale
as of 31/03/2009:
2010-2011
Reporting Guide has been updated for the fiscal year 2010/11.
Status: In Progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
The National Reporting Guide
was updated in March 2008. |
4.37 When negotiating agreements with each province,
Indian and Northern Affairs Canada should, in consultation with First
Nations, seek assurance that provincial legislation is being met. INAC
should also analyze the information obtained and follow-up when necessary. (4.33–4.36) |
INAC to work with provinces
to ensure that Agencies meet provincial legislation.
INAC to ensure that
compliance reviews are conducted on a regular basis, and as needed.
INAC to support Tripartite
Tables that discuss issues within each province and explore areas for
collaboration including the establishment of new enhanced prevention
frameworks.
INAC to coordinate a
schedule for annual FNCFS agency self-evaluations to assess agency
effectiveness including meeting provincial standards, on a three-year cycle
INAC to ensure that the
self-evaluations are conducted and results consolidated into a 3-year final
report. |
Ongoing
31/03/10
Ongoing
Completed
31/03/2010 |
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
INAC is working with provinces on a province-by-province
basis to ensure First Nation CFS programs meet provincial legislation, including
current work in Manitoba and New Brunswick.
Status: Ongoing
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC has intervened with
Agencies when provinces have indicated areas for improvement. For example,
INAC and the Government of Manitoba are co-funding an audit of a specific
Agency in the Province of Manitoba.
In the Atlantic Region,
funding has been withdrawn from one First Nation and
redirected to the Province as protection staff did not meet provincial
standards and therefore the Department’s authorities. Since that time, the
Province has provided additional oversight and resources to the First Nation.
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
An additional $500k was provided to strengthen compliance activities
in 5 regions in 2009-2010. Upon completion of the compliance activities,
regions will report on their progress as per the approved work plans.
Status: In Progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
All FNCFS agencies are
required to meet provincial standards. INAC regions have conducted 27
compliance reviews in fiscal year 2008/09.
______________________________________________
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
INAC continues to provide funding to support tripartite tables
in all jurisdictions.
Status: In Progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC has been heavily
involved in Tripartite tables throughout the transition of the FNCFS program
to an Enhanced Prevention Focused Approach. This is an ongoing exercise.
________________________________________
Status: Completed
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
A schedule for annual FNCFS
agency self-evaluations to assess agency effectiveness, on a three-year
cycle, was developed with regions in 2007-2008 and funding for the first year
of evaluations was transferred to regions in 2007-2008.
Funding for agency evaluations is now included in regional allocations as of
2009-10.
_________________________________________
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
Self-evaluations have been received from six of the seven
jurisdictions and are being reviewed. Work will begin on
the 3-year final report upon completion of the review of the individual
reports.
Status: In progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
21 evaluations are in
progress and reports are expected by end of summer 2009. Based on an analysis
of the agency self-evaluations, INAC will initiate discussions with provinces
and territories to work on individual agency deficiencies and share best
practices beginning in September 2009. INAC is exploring opportunities with
provinces for joint reviews and is working with provinces to address deficiencies
that may be identified in provincial program reviews. |
4.42 Indian and Northern Affairs Canada should resolve
the fundamental differences with Health Canada related to their
respective funding responsibilities for services to First Nations children in
care. (4.38–4.41) |
INAC to meet on a regular basis with Health Canada officials to
clarify responsibilities and funding for First Nations on reserve children in
care, and to develop a federal response on Jordan’s Principle.
INAC to identify key contacts (focal points) in regional offices
of INAC and Health Canada to identify and address emerging issues related to
jurisdictional responsibility for services required by a child with multiple
disabilities.
INAC to work with Health Canada to develop a
Memorandum of Understanding.
INAC and Health Canada to work to resolve funding and
eligibility issues regarding the Non-Insured Health Benefits Program (run out
of Health Canada). |
Ongoing
Ongoing
Completed |
Update/Rationale
as of 30/09/2009:
HC and INAC meet on a regular basis to discuss
implementation of Jordan’s Principle. HC has clarified their approach to NIHB
coverage of medical expenses for children in care who are ordinarily resident
on reserve and are now accepting responsibility for coverage of all eligible
children.
Status: In Progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC and HC have met on
numerous occasions over the course of fiscal year 2008/09 and have developed
a federal response based on a child-first approach which will address funding
issues.
(Audit Committee Comment:
* Letters were sent by Ministers
Strahl (INAC) and Clement (Health Canada) in May 2008 outlining the federal
response – a “child-first” approach – and inviting provinces to work
collaboratively on implementation)
_______________________________
Update/Rationale
as of 31/09/2009:
Regional
focal points will meet again in mid-October 2009.
Status: Ongoing
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
Regional focal points have
been identified by both INAC and Health Canada and meet regularly to discuss
areas requiring clarification. INAC/Health Canada focal point meetings took place in September 2008 and
February 2009. These meetings provided for a better understanding of federal responsibilities
and an update on activities in other jurisdictions. Health Canada obtained approval on an approach to address provincially disputed items in March 2009.
_______________________________________________
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
An MOU was signed between HC and INAC in May 2009.
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
An MOU will be signed by senior management within INAC
and Health Canada in May 2009.
________________________________________________
Status: Completed
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
Health Canada will be covering eligible expenses under the Non-Insured Health Benefits Program for
eligible children in care of FNCFS Agencies. |
4.47 Indian and Northern Affairs Canada should examine
the human resources requirements for this program and allocate sufficient
resources to meet these requirements. (4.44–4.46) |
INAC to conduct a Human
Resources Requirements Review for the Program
INAC to assess feasibility
of reallocate resources within the Department on an interim basis, and
developing a process for reallocation to reinforce compliance efforts and to
provide performance information. |
Completed
31/12/09 |
Status: Completed
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC has reviewed its human
resource requirements.
_________________________________________
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
The feasibility of reallocating resources on an ongoing
basis is being considered.
Status: In progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC has reallocated
resources within the Department on an interim basis and a process for
reallocation to reinforce compliance efforts and to provide performance
information is in place. |
4.67 Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, in consultation
with First Nations and provinces, should ensure that its new funding formula
and approach to funding First Nations agencies are directly linked with
provincial legislation and standards, reflect the current range of child
welfare services, and take into account the varying populations and needs of
First Nations communities for which it funds on-reserve child welfare
services. (4.48–4.66 |
INAC to ensure
that transition work towards the Enhanced Prevention focussed approach
include the requirements as outlined in the OAG recommendations.
The new costing
model is developed after reviewing the respective provincial program,
salaries and case loads to determine provincial comparability within the
FNCFS program authorities.
INAC to ensure
that once funding is obtained, Business Plans are developed by Agencies
clearly outlining provincial comparability, culturally appropriateness and
how the needs of the community will be met.
INAC continues
to work with ready and willing partners to transition the First Nations Child
and Family Services Program. |
31/03/13
Ongoing
31/03/13 |
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009: Canada’s Economic Action Plan announced a further $20 million over two
years to implement the enhanced prevention-focused approach. This transition
is underway in Prince Edward Island and Quebec. Work continues in the
outstanding jurisdictions to develop tripartite enhanced prevention
frameworks.
Status: Ongoing
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC requires
the development of tripartite enhanced prevention frameworks and new costing
methodologies in partnership with provinces and First Nations. The
frameworks outline the reasonably comparable and culturally appropriate
services that are to be provided over a five year period.
INAC is providing $98.1
Million over 5 years to implement this new approach in Alberta beginning in
2007/08 and all Agencies opted into the approach before March 31, 2008. In
July 2008, tripartite frameworks were reached between the Government of
Canada and the Provinces of Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan and First Nations in
those provinces to implement the enhanced prevention-focused approach. INAC
invested an additional $10.2 million over five years in Nova Scotia and $104.8
million over five years in Saskatchewan for First Nation agencies serving on
reserve children.
_______________________________________________
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
Development of comprehensive Business Plans are underway in
Quebec and Prince Edward Island and will be completed in the fiscal year.
Status: Ongoing
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
In Alberta, five-year Business Plans were developed in all 18 Agencies before the end of March
2008.
In Nova Scotia, a five-year Business Plan was developed before the end of
March 2009.
In Saskatchewan , five-year Business Plans have been developed by 13 out of 18 agencies that
were ready to opt-in in 2008-09. Region will continue to work with the 5
remaining agencies to finalize Business Plans in fiscal year 2009-10.
________________________________________________
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
INAC is continuing the work with outstanding jurisdictions
on transitioning to the new approach
Status: Ongoing
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
It is
anticipated that most, if not all jurisdictions will have moved to the
prevention-focused approach on-reserve by 2012-13. |
4.74 Indian and Northern Affairs Canada should determine
the full costs of meeting the policy requirements of the First Nations Child
and Family Services Program. It should periodically review the program's
budget to ensure that it continues to meet program requirements and to
minimize the program's financial impact on other departmental programs. (4.68–4.73) |
INAC to review its cost
estimate for delivering the program on a regular basis both regionally and
nationally and to incorporate updates into any business case. |
Quarterly |
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
INAC continues to work on business cases that include the
full cost of meeting business requirements.
Status: Ongoing
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC has consistently
assessed funding requirements as it has transitioned the FNCFS program to the
Enhanced Prevention Focused Approach. Each request for policy and funding
authority has included updated business cases.
INAC will continue to review
on an annual basis and seek sources of additional resources to minimize the
financial impact on other departmental programs. |
4.82 Indian and Northern Affairs Canada should carry out
the on-site compliance reviews required under the First Nations Child and
Family Services Program. It should also ensure that its British Columbia
region complies with Treasury Board authority. (4.75–4.81) |
INAC to increase its compliance
activities beginning in 2008-09 and ongoing.
INAC to ensure that prior to
entering into the enhanced prevention focused approach FNCFS agencies have
undergone recent compliance activity.
INAC to determine best
practices on compliance, including ensuring participation by Headquarters
officials in regional compliance reviews to better inform the revisions to
the directive.
INAC’s British Columbia
Region to develop an action plan to better comply with program authorities
with an orderly transition that will not undermine FNCFS services for First
Nations children. |
Ongoing
31/03/13
31/03/10
31/03/10 |
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
An additional $500k was provided to strengthen compliance activity
in 5 regions in 2009-2010 and the approved activities are being supported and
monitored by HQ.
Status: Ongoing
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC regions have conducted
27 compliance reviews in fiscal year 2008/09.
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
Compliance reviews will be completed by PEI and Quebec as part of the transition process to the Enhanced Prevention Focussed Approach.
Status: Ongoing/31/03/13
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
This practice is in place in
Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Nova Scotia; and will be in place in the next
provinces to move to the Enhanced Prevention Focused Approach.
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
INAC HQ will be working with Alberta and Saskatchewan on a
management control framework that will include reviewing practices for
compliance within the new approach. HQ continues to provide support to
regular ongoing regional compliance activities and quarterly monitoring of
enhanced compliance activities in those regions funded for additional
compliance resources.
Status: In progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
The FNCFS compliance
directive and approach will be linked to the
sector-wide approach which is currently in development, in the larger context
of risk management and compliance activities led by Audit and Evaluation
Sector. The revised FNCFS compliance directive to be completed by March 2010.
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
The Principles supporting the development of a transition plan
have been agreed upon by INAC and BC. Regional staff is reviewing best
practices of other regions, and an implementation timetable is being
developed.
Status: In progress
(Audit Committee Comment:
* A draft plan is currently being
developed) |
4.91 Indian and Northern Affairs Canada should define the
information it needs to manage the program and account for its results, with
a particular emphasis on results and outcomes. In cooperation with First
Nations and provinces, INAC should develop performance indicators, define
the information required, collect the information, and ensure its qulity. (4.83–4.90) |
INAC to develop performance
indicators for the FNCFS program.
INAC to validate the
performance indicators with key stakeholders (Regional Offices, First Nations)
INAC
to develop a national FNCFS Information system intended to capture both
quantitative and qualitative data that would demonstrate program outcomes. |
31/03/2008
31/03/2010
28/02/2010 |
Status: Completed
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
In fiscal year 2007/08, INAC
produced a Results-based Management and Accountability Framework that
included a Performance Measurement Strategy, which is now being refined.
(Audit Committee Comment:
* Performance Measurement Strategies
are now required by the
April 1, 2009 Government of Canada Policy on Evaluation and the Transfer
Payment Policy of October 2008).
_____________________________________
Update/Rationale as of 30/09/2009:
INAC met with Regional Staff and First Nations
representatives in July 2009 to discuss indicator development. The FNCFS
Performance Measurement Framework was updated in September 2009. Completion
of indicator validation is anticipated for Winter 2010.
Status: In progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC met with the Regional
Offices and conducted a validation exercise of the performance indicators in February
2008. INAC also initiated discussions with provinces/territories in
September 2008 to discuss mutually agreed upon indicator development.
INAC is planning to meet First Nations representatives to validate the
indicators and finalize the process. The expected date of the meeting is in Spring
2009 with a completed and updated Performance Measurement Strategy in place by
the end of September 2009.
_________________________________________________
Update/Rationale as of 31/03/2009:
The Preliminary Project Approval for the IMIT system is
targeted for completion early in the New Year, 2010.
Status: In progress
Update/Rationale as of
31/03/2009:
INAC has begun work on the
development of a National FNCFS Information System. The first stage of
development requires preparation of the Preliminary Project Approval (PPA)
document to identify resource requirements and potential systems. The
expected date of completion of the PPA is September 2009. |
|