Skip to main content Start of content

Principles and Guidelines for Oral Questions

The primary purpose of Question Period is to seek information from the Government and to call it to account for its actions. Practice, precedents and statements made by various Speakers in the House have helped over time to define the conduct of Question Period.

There is no formal notice requirement for the posing of oral questions, although some Members, as a courtesy, inform the Minister of the questions they intend to ask.

Members are given the greatest possible freedom during Question Period as long as their questions are consistent with the guidelines.

All questions and answers must be directed through the Chair. When recognized in Question Period, a Member should:

Restrictions on Oral Questions

A question should not:

Sub judice Convention

The sub judice convention (“under the consideration of a judge or court”) applies to debate, to statements and to Question Period. Members are expected to refrain from discussing matters actively before the courts or under judicial consideration in order to guard those involved in a court action or judicial inquiry from any undue influence. It is considered improper for a Member, in posing a question, or for a Minister, in responding, to comment on any matter that is sub judice.

While all Members share in this exercise of restraint, the Speaker must ultimately determine whether a subject raised during the consideration of Oral Questions is sub judice. A presumption exists in favour of allowing debate and against the application of the convention, and the approach of most Chair Occupants has been to discourage comments on sub judice matters.

Top of page