House Publications
The Debates are the report—transcribed, edited, and corrected—of what is said in the House. The Journals are the official record of the decisions and other transactions of the House. The Order Paper and Notice Paper contains the listing of all items that may be brought forward on a particular sitting day, and notices for upcoming items.
For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.
If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.
44th PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION | |
|
|
JournalsNo. 299 Monday, April 15, 2024 11:00 a.m. |
|
|
|
Prayer |
Private Members' Business |
At 11:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
The order was read for the second reading and reference to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs of Bill C-377, An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act (need to know). |
Mr. Ruff (Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound), seconded by Mr. Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton), moved, — That the bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Pursuant to Standing Order 93(1), the order was dropped to the bottom of the order of precedence on the Order Paper. |
Government Orders |
The order was read for the third reading of Bill C-50, An Act respecting accountability, transparency and engagement to support the creation of sustainable jobs for workers and economic growth in a net-zero economy. |
Ms. Khera (Minister of Diversity, Inclusion and Persons with Disabilities) for Mr. Wilkinson (Minister of Energy and Natural Resources), seconded by Mrs. Lebouthillier (Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard), moved, — That the bill be now read a third time and do pass. |
Debate arose thereon. |
Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Falk (Provencher), moved the following amendment, — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following: |
“the House decline to give third reading to Bill C-50, An Act respecting accountability, transparency and engagement to support the creation of sustainable jobs for workers and economic growth in a net-zero economy, since the bill will displace workers, kill jobs, and kill the very sector that provides the most investment and most advancements in alternative energy.”.
|
Debate arose thereon. |
Statements By Members |
Pursuant to Standing Order 31, members made statements. |
Oral Questions |
Pursuant to Standing Order 30(5), the House proceeded to Oral Questions. |
Daily Routine Of Business |
Motions |
Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan), seconded by Ms. Lantsman (Thornhill), moved, — That the 18th report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Wednesday, December 6, 2023, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 55) |
Debate arose thereon. |
Questions on the Order Paper |
By unanimous consent, Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the answers to questions Q-2371, Q-2379 to Q-2382, Q-2384, Q-2392 to Q-2395, Q-2397, Q-2401, Q-2404 to Q-2408, Q-2416 and Q-2417 on the Order Paper. |
|
By unanimous consent and pursuant to Standing Order 39(7), Mr. Lamoureux (Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) presented the returns to the following questions made into orders for return: |
Q-2372 — Ms. Michaud (Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia) — With regard to funding for the Canadian Coast Guard Auxiliary: (a) what is the government’s annual spending per province since 2019; and (b) what is the government’s annual spending per unit in Quebec since 2019? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2372.
|
|
Q-2373 — Mr. Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) — With regard to government-owned buildings or land: (a) how many buildings or pieces of land are unoccupied or vacant, in total, and broken down by metropolitan area; and (b) what are the details of each building or piece of land in (a), including the (i) physical address, (ii) size of the land, (iii) square footage of vacant buildings, (iv) current use, if any? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2373.
|
|
Q-2374 — Mr. Duncan (Stormont—Dundas—South Glengarry) — With regard to land owned or leased by the government: how much land and how many buildings are leased from third-party landlords as a percentage of the total of all government land and buildings? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2374.
|
|
Q-2375 — Mr. Dreeshen (Red Deer—Mountain View) — With regard to Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC): (a) how many individuals currently have permanent residency status in Canada; (b) what is the breakdown of the individuals in (a) by place of residence (i.e. living in Canada versus overseas); (c) what is the breakdown of the individuals in (a) by stream (i.e. Express Entry, economic, family class, or refugee); (d) how many permanent residency applications are still outstanding or being processed by IRCC; (e) how many permanent residency applications have been rejected; (f) for each rejection in (e), what were the reasons for rejection under statute; and (g) how many permanent resident cards have expired in the last 90 days? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2375.
|
|
Q-2376 — Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend) — With regard to Privy Council Office (PCO) access to information requests A-2020-00583, A-2021-00266, A-2021-00272, A-2021-00490, A-2021-00495, A-2022-00163, A-2022-00176 and A-2022-00182: (a) on what date did PCO receive each request; (b) to what date did PCO extend the deadline for responding to each request; (c) has PCO responded to each request, and, if not, (i) why not, (ii) on what date does PCO expect to respond to each request; (d) why did PCO not correctly estimate the amount of time required to respond to each request; (e) what is the Prime Minister's position on PCO's delays in processing access to information requests, including whether the delays are acceptable; and (f) if the Prime Minister does not consider the delays to be acceptable, what specific actions has he directed to be done to ensure that similar delays do not occur in the future? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2376.
|
|
Q-2377 — Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend) — With regard to government-owned land or buildings being considered for sale for the purpose of housing: what are the details of each building or piece of land, including the (i) address and location, (ii) size of the land, (iii) square footage, (iv) current state of the building or land, including the type of current occupants, if applicable, (v) current state of sale or disposal, (vi) expected date of sale or disposal, (vii) number of housing units projected to be built at the site? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2377.
|
|
Q-2378 — Mr. Jeneroux (Edmonton Riverbend) — With regard to Department of Employment and Social Development (ESDC) access to information requests A-2019-01074 and A-2020-01070: (a) on what date did ESDC receive each request; (b) to what date did ESDC extend the deadline for responding to each request; (c) on what date did ESDC receive the Information Commissioner's orders to respond to each request; (d) on what date was ESDC required, by the Information Commissioner's orders, to respond to each request; (e) has ESDC responded to each request, and, if not, (i) why not, (ii) on what date does ESDC expect to respond to each request; (f) what is ESDC's reason for not correctly estimating the amount of time required to respond to each request; (g) why did ESDC not comply with the Information Commissioner's orders; (h) in lieu of compliance with the Information Commissioner's orders, why did ESDC fail to apply to the Federal Court for a review of the orders; (i) what is the position of the Minister of Employment, Workforce Development and Official Languages, as ESDC's department head, on (i) the acceptability of these delays in processing access to information requests, (ii) ESDC's disregard of the Information Commissioner's orders, including ESDC's decision not to apply for Federal Court review; (j) if the minister considers the actions in (i) to be unacceptable, what specific actions has he directed to be done to ensure that similar failures do not occur in the future; (k) what is the position of the Attorney General of Canada on ESDC's combined failure to respond to the requests and apply for Federal Court review, including whether it undermines the government's commitment to the rule of law in Canada; and (l) what specific actions has the Attorney General directed to be done to ensure that similar failures do not occur in the future? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2378.
|
|
Q-2383 — Mr. Schmale (Haliburton—Kawartha Lakes—Brock) — With regard to the Student Direct Stream at Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada, broken down by year for 2022 and 2023: how many applications (i) were received, (ii) were approved, (iii) were refused or rejected, (iv) are still being processed, in total, and broken down by each participating country, including Antigua and Barbuda, Brazil, People's Republic of China, Colombia, Costa Rica, India, Morocco, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Senegal, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago, and Vietnam? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2383.
|
|
Q-2385 — Mr. Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie) — With regard to contracts awarded by the government to TELUS since January 1, 2009: what is the total value of these contracts, broken down by (i) year, (ii) department, agency, Crown corporation or government entity? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2385.
|
|
Q-2386 — Ms. Blaney (North Island—Powell River) — With regard to the RCMP’s response to the Final Report on the Implementation of the Merlo Davidson Settlement Agreement: (a) for each of the 16 recommendation categories, what steps has the RCMP taken to complete each recommendation; (b) for each recommendation in (a), what working groups, committees or other bodies have been created to oversee the completion of the recommendation; (c) what are the details of each group, organization or other body in (b), including the (i) number of staff, (ii) rank or job title of the individual responsible for that group, (iii) number of meetings held; (d) what is the total number of recommendations that the RCMP considers (i) completed, (ii) nearing completion, (iii) in progress, (iv) not started; and (e) by what date does the RCMP believe it will complete all recommendations of this report? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2386.
|
|
Q-2387 — Ms. Blaney (North Island—Powell River) — With regard to Veterans Affairs Canada and disability benefit decisions, broken down by fiscal year since 2015-16: (a) what is the total number of disability benefit claims received by the department; (b) how many of the claims in (a) were denied by the department; and (c) how many of the claims in (b) were denied due to (i) insufficient evidence being provided by the claimant, (ii) incomplete paperwork being submitted, (iii) incorrect paperwork being submitted, (iv) ineligibility of the claimant? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2387.
|
|
Q-2388 — Mr. Steinley (Regina—Lewvan) — With regard to expenditures made by the government for "Other professional services not elsewhere specified" (Treasury Board code 0499 or similar), broken down by department, agency, Crown corporation, or other government entity, since January 1, 2020: (a) what were the total expenditures each year; and (b) what are the details of each contract for such services, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) amount, (iv) description of services provided, (v) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced versus competitive bid)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2388.
|
|
Q-2389 — Mr. Steinley (Regina—Lewvan) — With regard to expenditures made by the government for "Non-professional personal service contracts not elsewhere specified" (Treasury Board code 0819 or similar), broken down by department, agency, Crown corporation, or other government entity, since January 1, 2020: (a) what were the total expenditures each year; and (b) what are the details of each contract for such services, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) amount, (iv) description of services provided, (v) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced versus competitive bid)? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2389.
|
|
Q-2390 — Mr. Van Popta (Langley—Aldergrove) — With regard to expenditures by the government to operate and maintain the Corporations Canada Business Registry, the NUANS Registry, the Multi-Jurisdictional Registry Access Service, and the Beneficial Ownership Registry, broken down by registry: (a) what were the total costs associated with each registry, broken down by year from 2017 to present; (b) what are the details of all contracts entered into by the government related to each registry, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) value or amount, (iv) description of goods or services, (v) manner in which the contract was awarded (solesourced, competitive bid), (vi) names of registries associated with the contracts; (c) when is each registry projected to reach “end of life”; (d) what are the security implications for these platforms; (e) what gaps, risks, and security exposures related to each registry platform has the government been made aware of; and (f) for each instance in (e), what corrective action was taken? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2390.
|
|
Q-2391 — Mr. Van Popta (Langley—Aldergrove) — With regard to the development and implementation of the Beneficial Ownership Registry: (a) what are the details of all contracts signed by the government to date related to the registry in any way, including, for each, the (i) date, (ii) vendor, (iii) value or amount, (iv) description of goods or services, (v) manner in which the contract was awarded (sole-sourced, competitive bid), (vi) duration; (b) what plans and milestones have been created for establishing modern interoperable systems for the Corporations Canada Business Registry, along with the Beneficial Ownership Registry, to work with the various provincial and territorial corporate registries; and (c) what funding has the government set aside to provide to provinces and territories for them to participate in data collection and sharing as part of the pan-Canadian beneficial ownership regime, in total, and broken down by province or territory? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2391.
|
|
Q-2396 — Mr. Kitchen (Souris—Moose Mountain) — With regard to the government's National Summit on Combatting Auto Theft held on or around February 8, 2024: (a) what are the total expenses incurred by the government to date related to the summit; and (b) what is the breakdown of the expenses in (a) by line item and type of expense? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2396.
|
|
Q-2398 — Ms. Barron (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — With regard to the national inventory of wrecked, abandoned or hazardous vessels, broken down by fiscal year since 2011-12: (a) what is the total number of vessels added to the inventory located (i) on the Pacific coast, (ii) on the Arctic coast, (iii) on the Atlantic coast, (iv) in the Great Lakes, (v) in the St. Lawrence Seaway; and (b) what is the total number of vessels removed from the inventory located (i) on the Pacific coast, (ii) on the Arctic coast, (iii) on the Atlantic coast, (iv) in the Great Lakes, (v) in the St. Lawrence Seaway? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2398.
|
|
Q-2399 — Ms. Barron (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — With regard to government funding for the removal of wrecked, abandoned or hazardous vessels, broken down by fiscal year and department or agency since 2011-12: what are the details of all projects or initiatives led by First Nations, Inuit or Métis communities or organizations, including the (i) group receiving the funding, (ii) date on which the funding was received, (iii) total amount of funding committed, (iv) location of the vessel or vessels identified for removal, (v) current status of the vessel or vessels? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2399.
|
|
Q-2400 — Ms. Barron (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — With regard to the Treasury Board Secretariat’s Directive on Term Employment, which took effect on April 1, 2020, broken down by department or agency since March 1, 2023: (a) what is the total number of term employees whom the department or agency converted to indeterminate status; (b) after reviewing the department’s or agency's financial situation over the two- to three-year planning horizon, what is the total number of term employees whose conversion to indeterminate status would result in workforce adjustment; and (c) what is the total number of employees who were informed that their cumulative work periods would not count towards their conversion from term to indeterminate status? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2400.
|
|
Q-2402 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to the implementation and processing of claims under Jordan’s Principle, broken down by fiscal year since its implementation: (a) broken down by regional focal point, what is the (i) number of urgent requests received, (ii) total number of requests received, (iii) number of urgent requests approved, (iv) total number of requests approved, (v) number of urgent requests denied, (vi) total number of requests denied, (vii) total amount of funding requested, (viii) total amount of funding approved; (b) broken down by regional focal point, what is the total number of staff available to process requests who are (i) full-time equivalent, (ii) part-time equivalent, (iii) on temporary contracts; (c) reflected as a number and a percentage, how many of the urgent requests in (a) were processed within 12 hours (i) after receiving first contact, (ii) after receiving all necessary information; and (d) reflected as a number and a percentage, how many of the non-urgent requests in (a) were processed within 48 hours (i) after receiving first contact, (ii) after receiving all necessary information? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2402.
|
|
Q-2403 — Mr. Angus (Timmins—James Bay) — With regard to the implementation and processing of claims under the Inuit Child First Initiative, broken down by fiscal year since its implementation: (a) broken down by regional focal point, what is the (i) number of urgent requests received, (ii) total number of requests received, (iii) number of urgent requests approved, (iv) total number of requests approved, (v) number of urgent requests denied, (vi) total number of requests denied, (vii) total amount of funding requested, (viii) total amount of funding approved; (b) broken down by regional focal point, what is the total number of staff available to process requests who are (i) full-time equivalent, (ii) part-time equivalent, (iii) on temporary contracts; (c) reflected as a number and a percentage, how many of the urgent requests in (a) were processed within 12 hours (i) after receiving first contact, (ii) after receiving all necessary information; and (d) reflected as a number and a percentage, how many of the non-urgent requests in (a) were processed within 48 hours (i) after receiving first contact, (ii) after receiving all necessary information? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2403.
|
|
Q-2409 — Mr. Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake—Eastman) — With regard to the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF): (a) how many applications to become a member of the CAF were received, broken down by year since 2016; (b) of the applications in (a), how many (i) were accepted, (ii) were denied, (iii) are still being processed; (c) what is the breakdown of (a) and (b) by each demographic that is tracked by the CAF (e.g. age, ethnicity, etc.); and (d) for those applications which were denied, what is the breakdown by reason for denial, by year, and by demographic? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2409.
|
|
Q-2410 — Mr. Bachrach (Skeena—Bulkley Valley) — With regard to government funding in the federal electoral district of Skeena—Bulkley Valley, broken down by fiscal year since 2006-07: (a) what is the total amount of funding provided to rights-holding First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples; and (b) what is the total amount of funding provided to non-rights-holding First Nations, Inuit and Métis organizations? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2410.
|
|
Q-2411 — Mr. Green (Hamilton Centre) — With regard to the Canada Dental Benefit, broken down by federal electoral district since the program's inception: (a) what is the total number of applications (i) received, (ii) approved; (b) what is the total dollar value of payments delivered to eligible applicants; and (c) how many children, in total, have been helped by the program? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2411.
|
|
Q-2412 — Ms. Blaney (North Island—Powell River) — With regard to government funding in the federal electoral district of North Island—Powell River, broken down by fiscal year since 2006-07: (a) what is the total amount of funding provided to rights-holding First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples; and (b) what is the total amount of funding provided to non-rights-holding First Nations, Inuit and Métis organizations? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2412.
|
|
Q-2413 — Ms. Barron (Nanaimo—Ladysmith) — With regard to government funding in the federal electoral district of Nanaimo—Ladysmith, broken down by fiscal year since 2006-07: (a) what is the total amount of funding provided to rights-holding First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples; and (b) what is the total amount of funding provided to non-rights-holding First Nations, Inuit and Métis organizations? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2413.
|
|
Q-2414 — Mr. Savard-Tremblay (Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot) — With regard to the importation of goods involving forced labour, prohibited under subsection 202(8) of Chapter 98 of the Customs Tariff: (a) since July 1, 2020, how many seizures have been made at Canadian ports of entry; (b) what are the details of each case, including (i) the dates, (ii) the country and region of origin of the goods, (iii) the description of these goods, including their respective quantities, (iv) their estimated value, (v) the delivery location in Canada, (vi) the intended recipients of the goods, (vii) what was done with the seized goods; and (c) if no goods originating from the Xinjiang region of China have been seized, why have no goods been seized within Canada, when the United States reports seizures of billions of dollars of goods from this region? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2414.
|
|
Q-2415 — Mr. Boulerice (Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie) — With regard to the government’s plan to refocus and cut government spending in budget 2023, broken down by department or agency: (a) has the department or agency instituted a hiring freeze; (b) what is the total number of staff who left the department or agency since budget 2023, represented as (i) retirements, (ii) secondments, (iii) temporary leave, (iv) firing for cause, (v) restructuring; and (c) what is the total amount of savings estimated as a result of the hiring freeze? — Sessional Paper No. 8555-441-2415.
|
Motions |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Genuis (Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan), seconded by Ms. Lantsman (Thornhill), — That the 18th report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, presented on Wednesday, December 6, 2023, be concurred in. (Concurrence in Committee Reports No. 55) |
The debate continued. |
At 6:15 p.m., pursuant to order made Monday, December 4, 2023, the Speaker interrupted the proceedings. |
Government Orders |
Pursuant to order made Monday, December 4, 2023, the House resumed consideration of the motion of Mr. Wilkinson (Minister of Energy and Natural Resources), seconded by Mrs. Lebouthillier (Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard), — That Bill C-50, An Act respecting accountability, transparency and engagement to support the creation of sustainable jobs for workers and economic growth in a net-zero economy, be now read a third time and do pass; |
And of the amendment of Mrs. Stubbs (Lakeland), seconded by Mr. Falk (Provencher), — That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following: |
“the House decline to give third reading to Bill C-50, An Act respecting accountability, transparency and engagement to support the creation of sustainable jobs for workers and economic growth in a net-zero economy, since the bill will displace workers, kill jobs, and kill the very sector that provides the most investment and most advancements in alternative energy.”.
|
The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 737 -- Vote no 737) | |
YEAS: 114, NAYS: 198 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aboultaif Falk (Battlefords—Lloydminster) Lewis (Essex) Scheer Total: -- 114 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aldag Dhaliwal Kusmierczyk Powlowski Total: -- 198 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Anandasangaree Findlay Schmale Total: -- 6 |
Pursuant to order made Monday, December 4, 2023, the question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to on the following division: |
|
(Division No. 738 -- Vote no 738) | |
YEAS: 169, NAYS: 144 |
|
YEAS -- POUR Aldag Dhillon Khalid Noormohamed Total: -- 169 |
|
NAYS -- CONTRE Aboultaif Dreeshen Lehoux Ruff Total: -- 144 |
|
PAIRED -- PAIRÉS Anandasangaree Findlay Schmale Total: -- 6 |
|
Accordingly, the bill was read the third time and passed. |
Private Members' Business |
At 7:13 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 30(7), the House proceeded to the consideration of Private Members' Business. |
The House resumed consideration of the motion of Ms. Fry (Vancouver Centre), seconded by Mr. Arya (Nepean), — That Bill S-209, An Act respecting Pandemic Observance Day, be now read a third time and do pass. |
The debate continued. |
The question was put on the motion and, pursuant to Standing Order 98(4), the recorded division was deferred until Wednesday, April 17, 2024, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions. |
Returns and Reports Deposited with the Clerk of the House |
Pursuant to Standing Order 32(1), papers deposited with the Clerk of the House were laid before the House as follows: |
— by the Speaker — Minutes of Proceedings of the Board of Internal Economy of the House of Commons for February 29, 2024, pursuant to Standing Order 148(1). — Sessional Paper No. 8527-441-45. |
— by Ms. Joly (Minister of Foreign Affairs) — Report of the Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission, together with the Auditors' Report, for the year ended December 31, 2023, pursuant to the Roosevelt Campobello International Park Commission Act, S.C. 1964-65, c. 19, s. 7. — Sessional Paper No. 8560-441-229-03. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(5), permanently referred to the Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs and International Development) |
— by Mr. MacKinnon (Leader of the Government in the House of Commons) — Orders in Council approving certain appointments made by the Governor General in Council, pursuant to Standing Order 110(1), as follows: |
— P.C. 2024-171. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-25-07. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics) |
— P.C. 2024-183. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-2-13. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food) |
— P.C. 2024-185, P.C. 2024-186, P.C. 2024-187, P.C. 2024-188, P.C. 2024-189, P.C. 2024-190 and P.C. 2024-191. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-14-16. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration) |
— P.C. 2024-205. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-9-21. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Finance) |
— P.C. 2024-182. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-10-08. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans) |
— P.C. 2024-203. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-4-23. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates) |
— P.C. 2024-177. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-1-18. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Indigenous and Northern Affairs) |
— P.C. 2024-184 and P.C. 2024-204. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-22-18. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Industry and Technology) |
— P.C. 2024-178 and P.C. 2024-207. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-17-13. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on National Defence) |
— P.C. 2024-179, P.C. 2024-180 and P.C. 2024-181. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-30-21. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security) |
— P.C. 2024-206. — Sessional Paper No. 8540-441-24-20. (Pursuant to Standing Order 32(6), referred to the Standing Committee on Transport, Infrastructure and Communities) |
Adjournment Proceedings |
At 7:51 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 38(1), the question “That this House do now adjourn” was deemed to have been proposed. |
After debate, the question was deemed to have been adopted. |
Accordingly, at 8:18 p.m., the Speaker adjourned the House until tomorrow at 10:00 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1). |