Skip to main content
Start of content

SMEM Committee Meeting

Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication
User Guide PDF
Skip to Document Navigation Skip to Document Content






House of Commons Emblem

Subcommittee on Private Members' Business of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs

NUMBER 021 
l
1st SESSION 
l
42nd PARLIAMENT 

EVIDENCE

Tuesday, May 7, 2019

[Recorded by Electronic Apparatus]

  (1310)  

[Translation]

The Chair (Ms. Linda Lapointe (Rivière-des-Mille-Îles, Lib.)):
    Welcome to the 21st meeting of the Subcommittee on Private Members' Business of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs on the determination of non-votable items pursuant to Standing Order 91.1(1).
    Mr. Graham, Ms. Kusie and Ms. Trudel, welcome. You have the list before you. Are there any comments? Do you want us to study them one by one?
Ms. Karine Trudel (Jonquière, NDP):
    The NDP has no comments on any of the bills and motions that have been introduced.
The Chair:
    Ms. Kusie, do you have any comments?
Mrs. Stephanie Kusie (Calgary Midnapore, CPC):
    We have no reason to oppose the bills on the list.
The Chair:
    Thank you.
    What about you, Mr. Graham?
Mr. David de Burgh Graham (Laurentides—Labelle, Lib.):
    I have no objection to these bills, and I am prepared to call the question.
The Chair:
    The motion reads as follows:
    
That the Subcommittee present a report listing those items which it has determined should not be designated non-votable and recommending that they be considered by the House.
    Do you all agree? I can see that you do.
    (Motion carried)
Publication Explorer
Publication Explorer
ParlVU