Skip to main content
Start of content

FINA Committee Meeting

Notices of Meeting include information about the subject matter to be examined by the committee and date, time and place of the meeting, as well as a list of any witnesses scheduled to appear. The Evidence is the edited and revised transcript of what is said before a committee. The Minutes of Proceedings are the official record of the business conducted by the committee at a sitting.

For an advanced search, use Publication Search tool.

If you have any questions or comments regarding the accessibility of this publication, please contact us at accessible@parl.gc.ca.

Previous day publication Next day publication

 

MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS

Meeting No. 94

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

The Standing Committee on Finance met in a televised session at 3:36 p.m. this day, in Room 253-D, Centre Block, the Chair, James Rajotte, presiding.

Members of the Committee present: Mark Adler, Hon. Scott Brison, Guy Caron, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Cathy McLeod, Peggy Nash, James Rajotte and Dave Van Kesteren.

Acting Members present: Dan Albas for Randy Hoback, Mike Allen for Shelly Glover, Mike Allen for Cathy McLeod, Stella Ambler for Dave Van Kesteren, David Anderson for Brian Jean, David Anderson for Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Armstrong for Brian Jean, Robert Aubin for Guy Caron, Hon. Mauril Bélanger for Hon. Scott Brison, Denis Blanchette for Hoang Mai, Denis Blanchette for Peggy Nash, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe for Peggy Nash, Tarik Brahmi for Guy Caron, Peter Braid for Mark Adler, Peter Braid for Cathy McLeod, Gordon Brown for Mark Adler, Gordon Brown for Randy Hoback, Paul Calandra for Randy Hoback, Paul Calandra for Dave Van Kesteren, John Carmichael for Brian Jean, Corneliu Chisu for Randy Hoback, Raymond Côté for Wayne Marston, Patricia Davidson for Shelly Glover, Dean Del Mastro for Randy Hoback, Pierre-Luc Dusseault for Wayne Marston, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay for Shelly Glover, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay for Cathy McLeod, Mylène Freeman for Hoang Mai, Robert Goguen for Randy Hoback, Claude Gravelle for Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle for Peggy Nash, Dan Harris for Peggy Nash, Hon. Laurie Hawn for Mark Adler, Hon. Laurie Hawn for Shelly Glover, Hon. Laurie Hawn for Brian Jean, Bryan Hayes for Cathy McLeod, Bryan Hayes for Dave Van Kesteren, Ed Holder for Brian Jean, Ed Holder for Cathy McLeod, Ted Hsu for Hon. Scott Brison, Roxanne James for Brian Jean, Peter Julian for Peggy Nash, Randy Kamp for Shelly Glover, Randy Kamp for Dave Van Kesteren, Hon. Mike Lake for Randy Hoback, Kevin Lamoureux for Hon. Scott Brison, Kellie Leitch for Mark Adler, Kellie Leitch for Randy Hoback, Kellie Leitch for Cathy McLeod, Kellie Leitch for Dave Van Kesteren, Dave MacKenzie for Cathy McLeod, Hon. John McCallum for Hon. Scott Brison, Costas Menegakis for Randy Hoback, Costas Menegakis for Brian Jean, Costas Menegakis for James Rajotte, Larry Miller for Randy Hoback, Christine Moore for Hoang Mai, Pierre Nantel for Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo for Hoang Mai, Massimo Pacetti for Hon. Scott Brison, LaVar Payne for Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne for Randy Hoback, Ève Péclet for Guy Caron, Hon. Geoff Regan for Hon. Scott Brison, Michelle Rempel for James Rajotte, Blake Richards for Randy Hoback, Blake Richards for Dave Van Kesteren, Bev Shipley for Cathy McLeod, Scott Simms for Hon. Scott Brison, Jinny Jogindera Sims for Guy Caron, Rathika Sitsabaiesan for Wayne Marston, Joy Smith for James Rajotte, Kevin Sorenson for Mark Adler, Brian Storseth for Dave Van Kesteren, Mark Strahl for Mark Adler, Glenn Thibeault for Guy Caron, Glenn Thibeault for Peggy Nash, Philip Toone for Hoang Mai, Philip Toone for Wayne Marston, Nycole Turmel for Hoang Mai, Nycole Turmel for Wayne Marston, Mike Wallace for Brian Jean, Mark Warawa for Brian Jean and David Wilks for Brian Jean.

Associate Members present: Harold Albrecht, Russ Hiebert, Ed Komarnicki, Wladyslaw Lizon and Tilly O'Neill Gordon.

Other Members present: Lise St-Denis, Hon. Tim Uppal and Hon. Lynne Yelich.

In attendance: Library of Parliament: Daniel Benatuil, Analyst; Mark Mahabir, Analyst; Sebastian Spano, Analyst; June Dewetering, Chief Analyst. House of Commons: Andrew Bartholomew Chaplin, Procedural Clerk; Rémi Bourgault, Procedural Clerk; Paul Cardegna, Procedural Clerk;  Cynara Corbin, Procedural Clerk; Isabelle Dumas, Procedural Clerk; Joann Garbig, Procedural Clerk; Marc-Olivier Girard, Procedural Clerk; Monique Hamilton, Procedural Clerk; Christine Holke David, Procedural Clerk; Julie Lalande-Prud'homme, Procedural Clerk; Simon Larouche, Procedural Clerk; Chad Mariage, Procedural Clerk; David-Andrés Novoa, Procedural Clerk; Jean-François Pagé, Procedural Clerk; Julie Pelletier, Procedural Clerk; Marie-France Renaud, Procedural Clerk; Alexandre Roger, Procedural Clerk; Jean-Michel Roy, Procedural Clerk; Marlene Sandoval, Procedural Clerk; Michelle Tittley, Procedural Clerk; Lucie Tardif-Carpentier, Legislative Clerk; Christine Lafrance, Legislative Clerk; Mike MacPherson, Legislative Clerk; Philippe Méla, Legislative Clerk; Chloé O'Shaughnessy, Legislative Clerk.

Witnesses: Department of Finance: Ted Cook, Senior Legislative Chief, Tax Legislation Division, Tax Policy Branch.

The Committee proceeded to the consideration of matters related to Committee business.

 

Peggy Nash moved – That the Committee invite the Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance, to appear before the Committee regarding the Supplementary Estimates (B) 2012-2013 before December 4, 2012 and that this meeting be televised.

 

Debate arose thereon.

 

Shelly Glover moved – That the motion be amended by replacing “the Honourable Jim Flaherty, Minister of Finance” with “department officials”.

 

Debate arose thereon.

 

At 3:38 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

 

At 4:25 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

At 4:29 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

 

At 5:14 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

Shelly Glover moved – That the debate on the motion be now adjourned.

 

The question was put on the main motion and it was agreed to, by a show of hands: YEAS: 6; NAYS: 5.

Pursuant to the Order of Reference of Tuesday, October 30, 2012, the Committee resumed consideration of Bill C-45, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures.

 

The Committee commenced its clause-by-clause study of the Bill.

 

 

STATEMENT BY THE CHAIR

 

“I want to outline for members the motion adopted by the Committee on October 31, 2012, in relation to the study of Bill C-45, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on March 29, 2012 and other measures. I would like to remind the Committee of certain important elements of this motion.

 

First of all, with respect to the timing, in paragraph (d) of the motion adopted by the Committee, it states that:

“ …the Chair may limit debate on each clause to a maximum of five minutes per party per clause before the clause is brought to a vote”.

So it's five minutes per clause. This is prior to 11:59 p.m., not for amendments. I just want to make sure everyone understands that.

I have two more items. The second point is with respect to the end of debate. Paragraph (f) of the motion adopted by the Committee states:

“(f) if the Committee has not completed the clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-45 by 11:59 p.m. on Wednesday, November 21, 2012, the Chair shall put, forthwith and successively, without further debate or amendment, each and every question necessary to dispose of clause-by-clause consideration of the Bill…”.

At that point, I will deal with all of the clauses that are left, if we have not completed our work by 11:59 p.m.

The third point is an amendment that has been sent to this Committee. As you recall, the motion called for the Chair to communicate with other committees and invite them to submit suggested amendments to the Finance Committee. I have received answers from all of the committees, none of which have forwarded any amendments.

However, there is an amendment from a member. This amendment will be considered by the Finance Committee according to paragraph (c) of the motion. This amendment is from Dr. Fry, who is a member of the Health Committee.

In paragraph (c) of the motion adopted by the Committee, it states:

“(c) any amendments suggested by the other standing committees…shall be deemed to be proposed during the clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-45…”.

To explain this so that everyone understands, if we go past 11:59 p.m., at that point I will just be putting the votes on the clauses. If we have amendments left to deal with, I will not be putting forward votes on those amendments.”

 

A point of order was raised by Brian Jean as to the Chair's interpretation of the motion previously adopted by the Committee.

 

 

RULING BY THE CHAIR

 

The Chair ruled that all motions in amendment submitted to the clerk for inclusion in the package of amendments for clause-by-clause consideration would not be considered to be deemed moved.

 

Whereupon, Brian Jean appealed the decision of the Chair.

 

At 5:31 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

 

At 6:52 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

The question: “Shall the decision of the Chair be sustained?” was put and the decision was overturned by a show of hands: YEAS: 1; NAYS: 10.

 

Accordingly, all of the clauses and all of the motions in amendment submitted to the clerk for inclusion in the package of amendments for clause-by-clause consideration were deemed moved and disposed of as follows:

 

Pursuant to Standing Order 75(1), consideration of Clause 1 was postponed.

 

The Chair called Clause 2.

 

On Clause 2,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 42 on page 2.

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 6 and 7 on page 2 with the following:

 

“employer after June 30, 2013 and before 2014 that are attributable to the taxpayer's”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 2 with the following:

 

“coverage after 2013 under a group sickness”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 2 with the following:

 

“(ii) all amounts contributed in 2014 in”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 4 on page 3.

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 3 with the following:

 

“(5) Subsection (2) applies to the 2014”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 3 with the following:

 

“(6) Subsection (3) applies to the 2015 and”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

After debate, Clause 2 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5.

 

On Clause 3,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 3, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 3 with the following:

 

“(2) Subsection (1) applies to the 2013 and”

 

Ted Cook answered questions.

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

After debate, Clause 3 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5

 

On Clause 4,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 4, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 4 with the following:

 

“that begin after June 30, 2013.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

After debate, Clause 4 carried on division.

 

On Clause 5,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by deleting line 31 on page 4 to line 18 on page 7.

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum— 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 5 with the following:

 

“(b) the amount becomes owing after June 30, 2013;”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by deleting lines 22 to 39 on page 7.

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum— 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 7 with the following:

 

“incurred after June 30, 2013. However, any”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 7 with the following:

 

“on or before the day that is 730 days after the”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 5, be amended by replacing line 39 on page 7 with the following:

 

“begin, after June 30, 2013.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

After debate, Clause 5 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

On Clause 6,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 9 with the following:

 

“and fiscal periods that end after June 30, 2013. However, in respect of acquisitions of”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 10 with the following:

 

“on July 1, 2013 and ends on the day that is”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing line 15 on page 10 with the following:

 

“545 days after the day on which the ways and”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

After debate, Clause 6 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, John McCallum — 5.

 

On Clause 7,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 7, be amended

 

(a) by deleting lines 22 to 34 on page 10.

(b) by deleting line 39 on page 10 to line 35 on page 12.

(c) by deleting lines 8 and 9 on page 13.

(d) by deleting lines 12 to 20 on page 13.

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 11 with the following:

 

“that period in the amount of $500,000;”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

After debate, Clause 7 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, John McCallum — 5.

A point of order is raised regarding the participation of a member who is not a regular member of the Committee.

Debate arose thereon.

 

RULING BY THE CHAIR

 

The Chair ruled that, in order to obtain the right to speak, a Member who is not a regular Member of the Committee must substitute a regular Member or have the consent of the Committee, as provided on page 1018 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

Whereupon, Kevin Lamoureux appealed the decision of the Chair.

The question “Shall the decision be sustained?” was put and the decision was sustained by a show of hands: YEAS: 10; NAYS: 1.

On Clause 8,

Ted Cook answered questions.

After debate, Clause 8 carried on division.

On Clause 9,

That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 12 on page 14 with the following:

 

“9. (1) Paragraph 37(1)(b) of the Act is re-”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by deleting line 12 on page 14 to line 12 on page 16.

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 15 with the following:

 

“before 2017, or”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by deleting lines 13 and 14 on page 16.

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 16 with the following:

 

“expenditures made after 2016.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren— 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 16 with the following:

 

“expenditures made after 2017.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended

 

(a) by replacing line 16 on page 16 with the following:

 

“in respect of expenditures made after 2016”

 

(b) by replacing line 19 on page 16 with the following:

 

“2017.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended

 

(a) by replacing line 16 on page 16 with the following:

 

“in respect of expenditures made after 2018”

 

 (b) by replacing line 19 on page 16 with the following:

 

“2019.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 16 with the following:

 

“on January 1, 2017.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren— 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 9, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 16 with the following:

 

“on January 1, 2019.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Mark Warawa, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

After debate, Clause 9 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Ted Hsu — 5.

 

On Clause 10,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 10, be amended by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 16 with the following:

 

“(2) Subsection (1) comes into force on July 1, 2013.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

At 8:55 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 9:10 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

After debate, Clause 10 carried on division.

After debate, Clause 11 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

After debate, Clause 12 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

After debate, Clause 13 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

After debate, Clause 14 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5.

 

After debate, Clause 15 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

On Clause 16,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 26 and 27 on page 20 with the following:

 

“(3) Subsections (1) and (2) come into force on July 1, 2013.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

After debate, Clause 16 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5.

 

On Clause 17,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 17, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 20 with the following:

 

“that begin, after June 30, 2013.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

After debate, Clause 17 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Sorenson, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5.

 

On Clause 18,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 18, be amended

 

(a) by replacing line 3 on page 23 with the following:

 

“after June 30, 2013, other than — if a”

 

(b) by replacing lines 11 to 13 on page 23 with the following:

 

“that occurs before 2014, or a winding-up of the subsidiary corporation into the parent corporation that begins before 2014, if”

 

(c) by replacing lines 16 to 18 on page 23 with the following:

 

“July 1, 2013 or was obligated as evidenced in writing before July 1, 2013 to acquire control of the subsidiary”

 

(d) by replacing lines 25 and 26 on page 23 with the following:

 

“tion as evidenced in writing before July 1, 2013 to amalgamate with, or wind up,”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 18, be amended by replacing lines 29 to 32 on page 23 with the following:

 

“made after August 13, 2013 other than a disposition made before 2014 pursuant to an obligation under a written agreement entered into before August 14, 2013 by parties that”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

After debate, Clause 18 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Scott Brison — 5.

 

On Clause 19,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 19, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 24 with the following:

 

“into force on July 1, 2013.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

After debate, Clause 19 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Scott Brison — 1.

 

On Clause 20,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 20, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 24 with the following:

 

“into force on July 1, 2013.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

After debate, Clause 20 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Scott Brison — 1.

 

On Clause 21,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 21, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 26 with the following:

 

“of dispositions made after June 30, 2013.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

After debate, Clause 21 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Scott Brison — 1.

 

On Clause 22,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 30 with the following:

 

“disposition made after June 30, 2013,”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 30 with the following:

 

“before August 14, 2013, the portion of”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 30 with the following:

 

“ship by a taxpayer before 2014 to a person”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 30 with the following:

 

“into by the taxpayer before July 1, 2013. A taxpayer is not considered to be”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 31 with the following:

 

“into force on July 1, 2013, except that”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 6 on page 31 with the following:

 

“(a) before August 14, 2013; or”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 31 with the following:

 

“2014 pursuant to an obligation under a”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 22, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 31 with the following:

 

“August 14, 2013 by parties that deal with”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

After debate, Clause 22 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Scott Brison — 1.

 

After debate, Clause 23 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

After debate, Clause 24 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

After debate, Clause 25 carried on division.

At 11:18 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 11:32 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

On Clause 26,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 19 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(i) for the 2013 taxation year, $70,000,”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 19 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(i) for the 2013 taxation year, $79,999,”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 20 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(ii) for the 2014 taxation year, $60,000,”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 20 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(ii) for the 2014 taxation year, $79,999,”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(iii) for the 2015 taxation year, $50,000;”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(iii) for the 2015 taxation year, $79,999,”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(iv) for the 2016 taxation year, $40,000,

(v) for the 2017 taxation year, $30,000,

(vi) for the 2018 taxation year, $20,000, and

(vii) for the 2019 taxation year, $10,000; and

(b) for the 2020 and subsequent taxation”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 33 with the following:

 

“years, $79,999.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 36 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(i) for the 2013 taxation year, 70%,”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 36 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(i) for the 2013 taxation year, 79.99%,”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(ii) for the 2014 taxation year, 60%, and”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(ii) for the 2014 taxation year, 79.99%, and”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 38 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(iii) for the 2015 taxation year, 50%; and”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 38 on page 33 with the following:

 

“(iii) for the 2015 taxation year, 79.99%; and”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 34 with the following:

 

“(iv) for the 2016 taxation year, 40%,

(v) for the 2017 taxation year, 30%,

(vi) for the 2018 taxation year, 20%, and

(vii) for the 2019 taxation year, 10%; and

(b) for the 2020 and subsequent taxation”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 26, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 34 with the following:

 

“years, 79.99%.”

 

After debate, the question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

After debate, Clause 26 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.

 

On Clause 27,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended

 

(a) by replacing line 5 on page 34 to line 6 on page 35 with the following:

 

“27. (1) Paragraph (a) of the definition “invest-”

(b) by deleting lines 14 to 23 on page 35;:

(c) by deleting line 26 on page 36 to line 11 on page 37;:

(d) by deleting lines 14 to 24 on page 42;:

(e) by deleting line 6 on page 43 to line 34 on page 44;:

(f) by deleting lines 6 to 36 on page 45; and:

(g) by deleting lines 4 and 5 on page 46.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing lines 5 to 26 on page 34 with the following:

 

“27. (1) The definition “first term shared-use-”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting line 26 on page 34 to line 5 on page 35.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 34 with the following:

 

“property of a taxpayer) acquired before 2017”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 34 with the following:

 

“property of a taxpayer) acquired before 2019”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 35 with the following:

 

“(a.1) 19.99% of the amount by which the”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 26 to 43 on page 36.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 36 with the following:

 

“(ii) 99.99% of an expenditure described in”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 1 to 5 on page 37.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 6 to 11 on page 37.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 22 to 29 on page 43.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 30 to 39 on page 43.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting line 40 on page 43 to line 3 on page 44.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 4 to 7 on page 44.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 8 to 12 on page 44.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 13 to 29 on page 44.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 30 and 31 on page 44.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 44 with the following:

 

“respect of expenditures made after 2016.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 44 with the following:

 

“respect of expenditures made after 2017.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 44 with the following:

 

“(32) Subsections (9), (24) and (25)”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 44 with the following:

 

“(32) Subsections (2), (24) and (29)”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 44 with the following:

 

“2018.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by adding after  line 34 on page 44 the following:

 

“(32.1) Subsections (2) and (29) apply in respect of expenditures made after 2016.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by adding after  line 34 on page 44 the following:

 

“(32.1) Subsections (9) and (25) apply in respect of expenditures made after 2016.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 1 on page 45 with the following:

 

“(33) Subsections (18), (20) to (22) and”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by adding after  line 3 on page 45 the following:

 

“(33.1) Subsection (3) comes into force on January 1, 2017.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by deleting lines 6 to 36 on page 45.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing lines 7 to 9 on page 45 with the following:

 

“taxation years that end after 2016, except that for taxation years that include January 1, 2017”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended

 

(a) by replacing line 7 on page 45 with the following:

 

“taxation years that end after 2018, except”

 

(b) by replacing line 9 on page 45 with the following:

 

“1, 2019”

 

(c) by replacing line 18 on page 45 with the following:

 

“taxation year and before 2019 is of the”

 

(d) by replacing line 22 on page 45 with the following:

 

“taxation year and after 2018 is of the”

 

(e) by replacing line 31 on page 45 with the following:

 

“taxation year and before 2019 is of the”

 

(f) by replacing line 35 on page 45 with the following:

 

“taxation year and after 2018 is of the”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 45 with the following:

 

“taxation year and before 2017 is of the”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 45 with the following:

 

“taxation year and after 2016 is of the”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 45 with the following:

 

“taxation year and before 2017 is of the”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 45 with the following:

 

“taxation year and after 2016 is of the”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 46 with the following:

 

“(37) Subsections (23) and (28)”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 27, be amended by replacing line 5 on page 46 with the following:

 

“come into force on February 1, 2022.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

Clause 27 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1.

 

Clause 28 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.

 

Clause 29 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren,  Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

On Clause 30,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 30, be amended by replacing lines 37 to 39 on page 50 with the following:

 

“after June 30, 2013.

 

(4) Subsection (2) comes into force on July 1, 2013.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

Clause 30 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.

 

Clause 31 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 32 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 33 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 34 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 35 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 36 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 37 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 38 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 39 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

On Clause 40,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 40, be amended by replacing line 7 on page 80 with the following:

 

“(2) Subsection (1) applies to the 2013 and”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

Clause 40 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.

 

Clause 41 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

On Clause 42,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 42, be amended

(a) by replacing line 5 on page 81 with the following:

 

“42. (1) The portion of subsection 180(1) of the Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

180. (1) An appeal to the Federal Court of

Appeal pursuant to subsection 172(3) may be

instituted by filing a notice of appeal in the

Court within 60 days from

(2) Subsection 180(1) of the Act is”

(b) by replacing line 18 on page 81 with the following:

 

“(3) The portion of subsection 180(1) of the Act after paragraph (d) is replaced by the following:

 

as the case may be, or within such further time

as the Court of Appeal or a judge thereof may,

either before or after the expiration of those 60

days, fix or allow.

(4) Subsections (1) to (3) come into force or are”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

Clause 42 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 43 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

On Clause 44,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 44, be amended

 

(a) by replacing lines 17 and 18 on page 87 with the following:

 

“(3) Subsection (1) applies after June 30, 2013, except that the definition “advantage””

 

(b) by replacing, in the English version, line 23 on page 87 with the following:

 

“rangement acquired before July 1, 2013”

 

(c) by replacing line 35 on page 87 with the following:

 

“after 2013 in respect of the note or”

 

(d) by replacing line 37 on page 87 with the following:

 

“June 30, 2013 in respect of the arrange-”

 

(e) by replacing line 8 on page 88 with the following:

 

“after June 30, 2013 and income earned,”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

Clause 44 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1.

 

On Clause 45,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 45, be amended

 

(a) by replacing line 22 on page 88 with the following:

 

“arrangement after July 1, 2013.”

 

(b) by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 90 with the following:

 

“(2) Subsection (1) applies after June 30, 2013. For the purposes of section 207.61 of”

 

(c) by replacing lines 28 and 29 on page 90 with the following:

 

“tion arrangement acquired before July 1, 2013 to provide for commercially reasonable”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

Clause 45 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10; NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1.

 

On Clause 46,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 46, be amended

 

(a) by replacing line 22 on page 92 with the following:

 

“(2) Subsection (1) applies to the 2013 and”

 

(b) by replacing lines 27 to 31 on page 92 with the following:

 

“(a) before July 1, 2013; or

 

(b) before 2014 pursuant to an obligation arising under a written agreement or arrangement entered into before July 1, 2013.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

Clause 46 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.

 

Clause 47 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 48 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

On Clause 49,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 99 with the following:

 

“time after June 30, 2013 in respect of a class”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 99 with the following:

“June 30, 2013 and before that time by the”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing lines 37 and 38 on page 102 with the following:

“(i) the amount became owing after June 30, 2013, or”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 103 with the following:

 

“July 1, 2013 and is a debt obligation”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 103 with the following:

 

“after June 30, 2013 and at or before that”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by adding after  line 5 on page 114 the following:

“(26) This section does not apply to a CRIC that is listed on a designated stock exchange.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 114 with the following:

 

“that occur after June 30, 2013. However,”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 114 with the following:

“actions that occur before 2014 between”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 114 with the following:

 

“before July 1, 2013 between the”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing lines 30 and 31 on page 114 with the following:

 

“into between the parties before July 1, 2013, and”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 8 on page 115 with the following:

 

“730 days after the day on which this Act”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 116 with the following:

 

“time after June 30, 2013 of any class of”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 116 with the following:

 

“time after June 30, 2013 in respect of a class”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 49, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 117 with the following:

 

“June 30, 2013 and before that time by the”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

Clause 49 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren —6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.

 

On Clause 50,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing line 12 on page 122 with the following:

 

“that end after June 30, 2013, except that”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 122 with the following:

 

“(a) for taxation years that include July 1, 2013, the amount of each dividend”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 122 with the following:

 

“taxation year that are after June 30, 2013”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 50, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 122 with the following:

 

“(b) before August 14, 2013, subsection”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

Clause 50 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.

 

On Clause 50,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 51, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 125 with the following:

 

“June 30, 2013.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

Clause 51 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.

 

Clause 52 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.

 

Clause 53 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash— 4.

 

On Clause 54,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 54, be amended by replacing line 23 on page 128 with the following:

 

“transaction that occurs after June 30, 2013.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Mike Lake, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

Clause 54 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash, Kevin Lamoureux — 5.

 

Clause 55 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 56 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 57 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 58 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 59 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 60 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 61 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Kevin Lamoureux — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 4.

At 1:01 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 1:14 a.m., the sitting resumed.

 

On Clause 62,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 3 on page 134 with the following:

 

“clause 37(8)(a)(ii)(B) of the Act is 64.99% of the”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 134 with the following:

 

“that end  after 2015, except that for taxation”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended

 

(a) by replacing lines 16 and 17 on page 134 with the following:

 

“that end after 2017, except that for taxation years that begin before 2019 the reference to”

 

(b) by replacing line 24 on page 134 with the following:

 

“year and before 2018 is of the number of”

 

(c) by replacing line 28 on page 134 with the following:

 

“year and after 2018 is of the number of”

 

(d) by replacing line 32 on page 134 with the following:

 

“year and after 2018 is of the number of”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 134 with the following:

 

“years that begin before 2017 the reference to”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 24 on page 134 with the following:

 

“year and before 2016 is of the number of”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 134 with the following:

 

“year and in 2016 is of the number of days”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 62, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 134 with the following:

 

“year and after 2016 is of the number of”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

Clause 62 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 63, be amended by deleting lines 34 to 39 on page 134.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 63, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 135 with the following:

 

“expenditures incurred after December 31, 2016.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 63, be amended by replacing line 20 on page 135 with the following:

 

“of expenditures incurred after 2016.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

Clause 63 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

On Clause 64,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 64, be amended by replacing line 23 on page 135 with the following:

 

“(2) Subsection (1) applies after 2016.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

Clause 64 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

Clause 65 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

Clause 66 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 67 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

On Clause 68,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 68, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 137 with the following:

 

“(2) Subsection (1) applies to the 2013 and”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6.

 

Clause 68 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

Clause 69 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 70 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 4.

 

Clause 71 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 72 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 73 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 74 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 75 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 76 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 77 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 78 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 79 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 80 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 81 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 82 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 83 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 84 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 85 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 86 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 87 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 88 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 89 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 90 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 91 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 92 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 93 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 94 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 95 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 96 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 97 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 98 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 99 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 100 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 101 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 102 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 103 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 104 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 105 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 106 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 107 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 108 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 109 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 110 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 111 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 112 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 113 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 114 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 115 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 116 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 117 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 118 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 119 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 120 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 121 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 122 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 123 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 124 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 125 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 126 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 127 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 128 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 129 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 130 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 131 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 132 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 133 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 134 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 135 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 136 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 137 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 138 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 139 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 140 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 141 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 142 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 143 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 144 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 145 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 146 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 147 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 148 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 149 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 150 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 151 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 152 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 153 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 154 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 155 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth,  Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 156 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

Clause 157 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

Clause 158 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

Clause 159 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

Clause 160 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

Clause 161 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

Clause 162 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

Clause 163 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

Clause 164 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth — 6; NAYS: Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

On Clause 165,

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force on the day following the day this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force two days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force three days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force four days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force five days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force six days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force seven days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force eight days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force nine days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 10 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 11 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 12 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 13 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 14 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

At 2:38 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 3:08 a.m., the sitting resumed.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 15 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 16 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 17 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 18 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 19 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 20 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 21 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 22 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 23 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 24 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 25 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 26 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 27 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 28 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 29 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 30 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 31 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 32 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 33 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 34 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 35 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 36 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 37 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 38 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 39 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 40 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 41 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 42 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 43 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 44 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 45 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 46 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 47 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 48 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 49 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 50 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 51 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 52 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 53 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 54 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 55 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 56 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 57 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 58 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 59 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 60 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 61 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 62 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 63 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 64 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 65 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 66 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger  — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 67 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 68 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 69 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger  — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 70 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 71 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 72 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 73 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 74 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 75 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 76 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 77 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 78 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 79 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 80 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 81 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 82 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 83 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 84 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 85 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 86 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 87 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 88 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 89 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 90 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 91 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 92 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 93 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 94 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 95 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 96 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 97 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 98 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 99 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 100 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 101 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 102 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 103 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 104 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 105 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 106 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 107 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 108 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 109 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 110 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 111 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 112 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 113 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 114 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 115 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 116 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 117 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 118 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 119 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 120 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 121 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 122 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 123 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 124 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 125 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 126 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 127 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 128 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 129 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 130 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 131 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

At 4:21 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 4:39 a.m., the sitting resumed.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 132 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 133 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 134 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 135 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 136 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 137 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 138 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 139 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 140 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 141 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 142 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 143 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 144 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 145 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 146 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 147 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 148 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 149 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 150 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 151 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 152 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 153 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 154 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 155 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 156 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 157 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 158 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 159 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 160 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Ève Péclet, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 161 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 162 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 163 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 164 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 165 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 166 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 167 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 168 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 169 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 170 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mark Strahl, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Kellie Leitch, Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 171 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Brian Storseth, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 172 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 173 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 174 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 175 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 176 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger  — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 177 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 178 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 179 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 180 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 181 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 182 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 183 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 184 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 185 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 186 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 187 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 188 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 189 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 190 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 191 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 192 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 193 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 194 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 195 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 196 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 197 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 198 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 199 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 200 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 201 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 202 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

At 5:36 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 5:48 a.m., the sitting resumed.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 203 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 204 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 205 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 206 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 207 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 208 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 209 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 210 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 211 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 212 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 213 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 214 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 215 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 216 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 217 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 218 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 219 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 220 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Peter Braid, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, Brian Jean, Ed Holder, Randy Kamp, Pierre Nantel, Hoang Mai, Pierre-Luc Dusseault, Peggy Nash — 10.

At 6:00 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 12:13 p.m., the sitting resumed.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 221 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 222 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 223 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 224 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 225 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 226 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 227 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 228 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 229 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 230 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 231 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 232 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 233 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 234 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 235 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 236 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 237 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 238 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 239 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 240 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 241 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 242 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 243 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 244 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 245 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 246 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 247 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 248 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 249 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 250 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 251 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 252 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 253 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 254 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 255 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 256 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 257 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 258 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 259 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 260 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 261 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 262 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 263 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 264 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 265 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 266 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 267 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 268 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 269 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 270 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 271 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 272 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 273 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 274 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 275 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 276 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 277 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 278 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 279 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 280 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 281 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 282 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 283 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 284 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 285 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 286 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 287 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 288 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 289 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 290 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 291 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 292 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 293 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 294 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 295 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 296 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 297 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 298 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 299 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 300 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 301 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 302 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 303 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 304 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Patricia Davidson, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Wayne Marston, Peggy Nash — 10.

At 12:56 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 1:42 p.m., the sitting resumed.

At 1:42 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 1:43 p.m., the sitting resumed.

At 1:44 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 1:47 p.m., the sitting resumed.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 305 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 306 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 307 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 308 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, John Carmichael, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 309 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 310 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 311 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 312 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 313 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 314 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 315 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 316 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 317 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 318 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 319 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 320 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 321 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 322 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 323 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 324 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 325 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 326 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 327 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 328 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Ed Holder, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Hoang Mai, Claude Gravelle, Peggy Nash — 10.

At 2:00 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 3:24 p.m., the sitting resumed.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 329 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, David Anderson, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 8.

At 3:25 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 4:10 p.m., the sitting resumed.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 330 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 331 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, David Anderson, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 332 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, David Anderson, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 333 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 334 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, David Anderson, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 335 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, David Anderson, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 336 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 337 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 338 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 339 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 9.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 340 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 341 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 342 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 343 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 344 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 345 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 346 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 347 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 348 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 349 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 350 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 351 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 352 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 353 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 354 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle— 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 355 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 356 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 357 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 358 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle— 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 359 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 360 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 361 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 362 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 363 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 165, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 197 with the following:

“(2) Subsection 163(3) comes into force 364 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mylène Freeman, Robert Aubin, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

Clause 165 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5.

Clause 166 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

 

 

Clause 167 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

 

 

Clause 168 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

 

 

Clause 169 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

 

 

Clause 170 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

 

 

Clause 171 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Scott Brison — 10; NAYS: Claude Gravelle — 1.

 

 

 

Clause 172 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

 

 

On Clause 173,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“equipment that”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 65 per cent of the”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 64 per cent of the”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 63 per cent of the”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 62 per cent of the”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 61 per cent of the”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 60 per cent of the”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 65 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 65 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 65 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 64 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 64 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 64 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 63 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 63 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 63 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 62 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 62 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 62 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 61 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 61 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 61 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 60 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 60 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) obstructs more than 60 per cent of the width of any river or stream or more than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“width of any river or stream or more than 32 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“width of any river or stream or more than 31 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“width of any river or stream or more than 30 per cent of the width of the main channel at low”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 173, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 203 with the following:

 

 

 

“weir or other fishing equipment that, in the”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

At 4:48 p.m., by unanimous consent and pursuant to Standing Order 115(5), it was agreed that the Committee continue to sit to finish with clause 173.

 

 

 

Clause 173 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Dean Del Mastro, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison — 7; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 4.

At 4:48 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 115(5), the sitting was suspended.

At 5:39 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

On Clause 174,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 174, be amended by adding after  line 16 on page 204 the following:

 

 

 

“(8) The Environmental Damages Fund referred to in subsection (6) is to be administered by a board chaired by the Minister and  composed of one representative from each province and territory, and three representatives from each of the following: 

(a) Aboriginal peoples;

(b) environmental non-governmental organizations.

(9) The representatives appointed to the board referred to in subsection (8) shall hold office without remuneration and shall not be reimbursed for expenses incurred in the course of their duties.”

 

 

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

 

 

Clause 174 carried on division.

 

 

 

On Clause 175,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by replacing lines 21 to 25 on page 204 with the following:

 

 

 

““Aboriginal”, in relation to a fishery, means a fishery for

the harvesting of fish by an Aboriginal organization,

or any of its members, for the purpose of using

the fish as food or earning a moderate livelihood or

for social or ceremonial purposes, and includes

a traditional Aboriginal fishery, whether or not

it is currently active, and an Aboriginal fishery

recognized by a treaty or land”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5;NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Randy Hoback, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by replacing lines 24 to 27 on page 204 with the following:

 

 

 

“the fish as food, for social, ceremonial or traditional purposes;”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division:

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 175, be amended by adding after  line 27 on page 204 the following:

 

 

 

“(2) Within five years after the definition “Aboriginal”, as enacted by subsection 133(3) of the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act, comes into force, a comprehensive review of the application and operation of the definition shall be undertaken, in consultation with representatives of Canada's Aboriginal peoples, by such committee of the House of Commons as may be designated or established by that House for that purpose.

(3) The committee referred to in subsection (2) shall, within a year after a review is undertaken pursuant to that subsection or within such further time as may be authorized by the House of Commons, submit a report on the review to Parliament, including a statement of any changes that the committee recommends.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Randy Hoback, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 175 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Randy Hoback, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

 

 

Clause 176 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Randy Hoback, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Scott Brison — 7; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, — 4.

 

 

 

On Clause 177,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 177, be amended by deleting line 30 on page 205 to line 11 on page 206.

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Randy Hoback, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 177, be amended by deleting line 30 on page 205 to line 11 on page 206.

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle, Scott Brison — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Randy Hoback, Costas Menegakis, Cathy McLeod, Paul Calandra — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 177 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Laurie Hawn, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Cathy McLeod, Paul Calandra, Scott Brison — 7; NAYS: Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 4.

At 5:49 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 5:57 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

 

On Clause 178,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“on the day following the day this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“two days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“three days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“four days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“five days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“six days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“seven days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“eight days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“nine days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“10 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“11 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“12 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“13 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“14 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“15 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“16 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“17 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

“18 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“19 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“20 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“21 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“22 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“23 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“24 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“25 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“26 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“27 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“28 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“29 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“30 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“31 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“32 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“33 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“34 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“35 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“36 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“37 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“38 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“39 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“40 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“41 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“42 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“43 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“44 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“45 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“46 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“47 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“48 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“49 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“50 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“51 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“52 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“53 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“54 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“55 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“56 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“57 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“58 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“59 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“60 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“61 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“62 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“63 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“64 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“65 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“66 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“67 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“68 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“69 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“70 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“71 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“72 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“73 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Robert Aubin, Mylène Freeman, Wayne Marston, Claude Gravelle — 10.

At 6:30 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 6:39 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

At 6:39 p.m., Peggy Nash took the Chair.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“74 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“75 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“76 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“77 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“78 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“79 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“80 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“81 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“82 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“83 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“84 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“85 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“86 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“87 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“88 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“89 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“90 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“91 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“92 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“93 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“94 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“95 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“96 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“97 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“98 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“99 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“100 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“101 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“102 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“103 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Bev Shipley, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“104 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“105 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“106 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“107 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“108 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“109 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“110 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“111 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“112 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“113 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“114 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“115 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“116 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“117 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“118 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“119 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“120 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“121 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“122 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“123 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“124 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“125 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“126 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“127 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“128 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“129 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“130 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“131 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“132 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Randy Hoback, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“133 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“134 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“135 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“136 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“137 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“138 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“139 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“140 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“141 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“142 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“143 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, David Anderson, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“144 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“145 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“146 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“147 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“148 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“149 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“150 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“151 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“152 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“153 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“154 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“155 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“156 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“157 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“158 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“159 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 12 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“178.  Sections 173 to 176 come into force on the later of June 1, 2013 and the day on which subsection 147(1) of the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act comes into force.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“160 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“161 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“162 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“163 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“164 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“165 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“166 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“167 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“168 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“169 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“170 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“171 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“172 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“173 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“174 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“175 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“176 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“177 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“178 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“179 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“180 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“181 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“182 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“183 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“184 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“185 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“186 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“187 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“188 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“189 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“190 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Scott Brison — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“191 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“192 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“193 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“194 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“195 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“196 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“197 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“198 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“199 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“200 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“201 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“202 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“203 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“204 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“205 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“206 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“207 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“208 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“209 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“210 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“211 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“212 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“213 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“214 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“215 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“216 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“217 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“218 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“219 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“220 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“221 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“222 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“223 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“224 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“225 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“226 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“227 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“228 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“229 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“230 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“231 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“232 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“233 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“234 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“235 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“236 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“237 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“238 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“239 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“240 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“241 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“242 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“243 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“244 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“245 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“246 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“247 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“248 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“249 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“250 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“251 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“252 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“253 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“254 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“255 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“256 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“257 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“258 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“259 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“260 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“261 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“262 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“263 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“264 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“265 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“266 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“267 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“268 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“269 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“270 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

“271 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“272 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“273 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“274 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“275 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“276 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“277 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“278 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“279 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“280 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“281 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“282 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“283 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“284 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“285 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“286 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“287 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“288 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“289 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“290 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“291 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Peggy Nash — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“292 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“293 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“294 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“295 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“296 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“297 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“298 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“299 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“300 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

At 8:28 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 8:40 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“301 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“302 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“303 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“304 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“305 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“306 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“307 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“308 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“309 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“310 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“311 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“312 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“313 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“314 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“315 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“316 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“317 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“318 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“319 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“320 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“321 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“322 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“323 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“324 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“325 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“326 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“327 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“328 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“329 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“330 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“331 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“332 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“333 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“334 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“335 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“336 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“337 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“338 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“339 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“340 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“341 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“342 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“343 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“344 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“345 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“346 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“347 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“348 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“349 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“350 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“351 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“352 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“353 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“354 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“355 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Costas Menegakis, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Paul Calandra, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“356 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“357 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“358 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“359 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“360 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“361 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“362 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“363 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 178, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 15 on page 206 with the following:

 

 

 

“364 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

 

 

Clause 178 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 3.

 

 

 

On Clause 179,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 206 with the following:

 

“179. The Bridge to Strengthen Trade and Avoid Legal Recourse Act,”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 206 with the following:

 

“179. The Detroit River International Crossing Act,”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 206 with the following:

 

“1. This Act may be cited as the Bridge To Strengthen Trade and Avoid Legal Recourse Act.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 22 and 23 on page 206 with the following:

 

“1. This Act may be cited as the Detroit River International Crossing Act.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 206 with the following:

 

“approaches to the bridge, as the project is understood to exist on the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 34 to 36 on page 207 with the following:

 

“3. (1) Section 6 of the International Bridges and

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after  line 28 on page 208 the following:

 

“(3) The exemptions provided for in subsections (1) and (2) apply in respect of obligations that accrue after the 30th anniversary of the coming into force of this section.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 39 on page 208 with the following:

 

“published in the Canada Gazette and posted on the website of Transport Canada.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 11 on page 209 with the following:

 

“tion, they must file with the Minister, and receive his or her approval for, a plan that”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 209 with the following:

 

“(2) The person must hold a public consultation and consult with the Minis-”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after  line 18 on page 209 the following:

 

“(3) After the plan is filed with the Minister, it is posted on the website of Transport Canada.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 209 with the following:

 

“with the Minister, and receive his or her approval for, a plan that includes all”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 209 with the following:

 

“work, undertaking or activity and the Minister must approve the plan.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 31 on page 209 with the following:

 

“(2) The person must hold a public consultation and consult with the Minis-”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after  line 40 on page 209 the following:

 

“(4) After the plan is filed with the Minister, it is posted on the website of Transport Canada.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after  line 40 on page 209 the following:

 

“(4) Before a person begins to carry on any work, undertaking or activity for a purpose referred to in subsection (1) that is likely to affect fish habitat in an Aboriginal fishery, as defined in  subsection 133(3) of the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act, the person must consult any Aboriginal organization  whose members harvest fish from that habitat.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 6 on page 210 with the following:

 

“with the Minister, and obtain the Minister's approval for, a plan that includes all”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 210 with the following:

 

“the residences of its individuals and the Minister must approve the plan.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 10 and 11 on page 210 with the following:

 

“(2) The person must hold public consultations on the plan and consult with the Minister of the Environment before filing it.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after  line 11 on page 210 the following:

 

“(2.1) The plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 22 on page 210 with the following:

 

“construction, they must file with the Minister, and obtain the Minister's approval for, a”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 210 with the following:

 

“to the construction and the Minister must approve the plan.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after  line 27 on page 210 the following:

 

“(2) The person must hold public consultations on the plan and consult with conservation experts  and the Minister of the Environment before filing the plan.

(3) The plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 34 on page 210 with the following:

 

“the Minister, and obtain the Minister's approval for, a plan that includes all measures to”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 36 and 37 on page 210 with the following:

 

“(2) The person must hold public consultations on the plan and consult with the Windsor Port Authority before filing it.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after  line 37 on page 210 the following:

 

“(3) The plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 7 on page 211 with the following:

 

“with the Minister and, when approved by the Minister, it”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after  line 8 on page 211 the following:

 

“(4) The amended plan as approved by the Minister must be posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 18 on page 211 with the following:

 

“apply to the designation, but the designation must be published in the Canada Gazette and posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 212 with the following:

 

“the Omnibus  Act No. 2, 2012 is deemed to”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after  line 8 on page 213 the following:

 

“(4) The agreement must be tabled in both Houses of Parliament and posted on the website of the Department of Transport.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by replacing lines 28 to 30 on page 213 with the following:

 

“not more than $50,000; and

(b) in any other case, to a fine of  not more than $5,000,000.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 179, be amended by adding after  line 17 on page 214 the following:

 

“29. The Minister must table annually in each House of Parliament a report on measures taken to ensure compliance with plans filed under sections 7 to 11, on agreements entered into by the Minister under section 22 and on the prosecution of offences under section 24.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

Clause 179 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7; NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4.

 

Clause 180 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7; NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4.

 

Clause 181 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7; NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4.

 

Clause 182 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7; NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4.

On Clause 183,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 183, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 215 with the following:

 

“3. Section 6 of the”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

Clause 183 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7; NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4.

 

On Clause 184,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 184, be amended by replacing line 41 on page 215 with the following:

 

“the work, undertaking or activity and the Minister must approve the plan.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 184, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 216 with the following:

 

“the work, undertaking or activity and the Minister must approve the plan.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

Clause 184 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7; NAYS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4.

 

Clause 185 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 186 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 187 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 188 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 189 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 190 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 191 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 192 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 193 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 194 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 195 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 196 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 197 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 198 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 199 carried on the following recorded division: Y YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 200 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 201 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 202 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

On Clause 203,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 203, be amended by replacing lines 31 to 39 on page 225 with the following:

 

“subsection (1), whenever any Bill is introduced in the House of Commons to amend this Act in a manner that would in the opinion of the Chief Actuary materially affect any of the estimates contained in the most recent report made under that subsection, the Chief Actuary shall prepare a report as set out in subsection (3) and provide it to the Minister of Finance, who shall table that report before the House within five sitting days after receiving it.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

Clause 203 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 204 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 205 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 206 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 3.

 

Clause 207 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 3.

 

On Clause 208,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 208, be amended by replacing lines 1 to 3 on page 228 with the following:

 

“in accordance with the regulations and is submitted to the Minister by the council of the band.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 208, be amended by deleting lines 16 to 19 on page 228.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 208, be amended by adding after  line 19 on page 228 the following:

 

“40.2 The Minister shall prepare an annual report on the number of requests for designation or surrender, and the number of  such requests that resulted in a designation or surrender, during that year and, within four months after the end of each year, shall cause a copy of the report to be laid before each House of Parliament.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

Clause 208 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 3.

 

On Clause 209,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 209, be amended by adding after  line 22 on page 228 the following:

 

“(2) Within five years after this Division comes into force, a comprehensive review of the provisions and operation of this Division shall be undertaken, in consultation with representatives of the First Nations, by such committee of the House of Commons as may be designated or established by  that House for that purpose.

 

 (3) The committee referred to in subsection (2) shall, within a year after a review is undertaken pursuant to that subsection or within such further time as may be authorized by the House of Commons, submit a report on the review to Parliament, including a statement of any changes that the committee recommends.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

Clause 209 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 3.

 

On Clause 210,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 33 on page 228 with the following:

 

“Appeal, $325,300;”

 

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 229 with the following:

 

“(a) the Chief Justice of Quebec, $325,300;”

 

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 28 on page 229 with the following:

“Appeal, $296,700 each;”

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 38 on page 229 with the following:

“$325,300;”

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 2 on page 230 with the following:

“Appeal, $296,700 each;”

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 13 on page 230 with the following:

“$325,300;”

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 15 on page 230 with the following:

“Appeal, $ 296,700 each;”

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing lines 24 and 25 on page 230 with the following:

“(a) the Chief Justice of Manitoba, $325,300;

(b) the six Judges of Appeal, $296,700 each;”

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 37 on page 230 with the following:

“$325,300;”

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 38 on page 230 with the following:

“(b) the 12 Justices of Appeal, $296,700 each;”

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 7 on page 231 with the following:

“Island, $325,300;”

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 231 with the following:

“Division, $296,700 each;”

 

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing lines 19 and 20 on page 231 with the following:

“$325,300;

(b) the six Judges of Appeal, $296,700 each;”

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing lines 28 and 29 on page 231 with the following:

“(a) the Chief Justice of Alberta, $325,300;

(b) the 10 Justices of Appeal, $296,700 each;”

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 210, be amended by replacing lines 2 to 4 on page 232 with the following:

“Labrador, $325,300;

(b) the five Judges of Appeal, $296,700 each;

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

 

Whereupon, Kevin Lamoureux appealed the decision of the Chair.

 

The question “Shall the decision be sustained?” was put and the decision was sustained by a show of hands: YEAS: 10; NAYS: 1.

 

Clause 210 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 212, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 21 on page 233 with the following:

 

“after receiving it.

(8) If the Minister of Justice disagrees with the recommendations of the Commission, the response to the report shall provide the reasons.

(9) Within 30 days after the issuance of the response, the Minister of Justice shall try to resolve the disagreement with the Commission.

(10) The Minister of Justice shall cause the tabling in each House of Parliament of a report prepared by the Minister and the Commission.

(11) The report shall be referred

by that House to a committee of that

House that is designated or established by that

House for the purpose of considering matters

relating to justice.

(12) Following issuance of the response referred to in subsection (7) or the tabling of the report referred to in subsection (10), if applicable, the Minister of Justice shall, within a reasonable period, cause to be prepared and introduced a bill to implement the response or the report, as the case may be.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

Clause 211 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

On Clause 212,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 212, be amended by replacing lines 18 and 19 on page 233 with the following:

 

“after receiving it. Following that response he or she shall, within a reasonable”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kevin Lamoureux, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

Clause 212 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Kevin Lamoureux — 8; NAYS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 3.

 

Clause 213 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 214 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean,  Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 10; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 215 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 216 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 10; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 217 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 10; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 218 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 10; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 219 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 220 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 221 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 222 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

On Clause 223,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 223, be amended

(a) by replacing line 20 on page 239 with the following:

 

“the employee is entitled under this Part, twelve”

 

(b) by replacing line 24 on page 239 with the following:

 

“(b) in the case of any other complaint, twelve”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

Clause 223 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 224 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

On Clause 225,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 225, be amended by adding after  line 6 on page 244 the following:

 

“251.102 (1) The Minister shall, on or before December 31 next following the end of each fiscal year, prepare a report on the reviews conducted under 251.101(3) that includes the following information:

 

(a) the number of reviews where the payment order or the notice was confirmed;

 

(b) the number of reviews where the payment order or the notice was rescinded or varied; and

 

(c) an assessment of the length of time required to complete the reviews.

 

(2) The Minister must, during the fiscal year after the fiscal year for which the report is prepared, cause the report to be laid before each House of Parliament.”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 4; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler — 7.

 

Clause 225 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 226 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 227 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 228 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 229 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 230 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 231 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault, Kevin Lamoureux — 11; NAYS: — 0.

At 10:14 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 10:31 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

On Clause 232,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force on the day following the day this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force two days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force three days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 


The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force four days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force five days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force six days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force seven days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force eight days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 


The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force nine days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 10 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 11 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 12 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 13 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 14 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 15 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 


The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 16 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 17 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 18 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 19 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 20 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 21 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 22 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 23 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 24 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 25 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 26 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti —1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 27 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 28 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 29 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 30 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 31 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 32 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 33 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 34 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 35 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 36 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 37 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 38 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 39 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 40 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 41 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 42 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 43 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 44 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 45 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 46 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 47 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 48 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 49 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 50 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 51 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 52 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 53 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 54 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti —1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 55 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 56 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 57 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 58 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 59 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 60 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 61 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 62 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 63 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 64 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 65 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 66 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 67 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 68 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 69 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 70 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 71 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 72 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 73 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 74 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 75 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 76 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 77 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Joy Smith, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Larry Miller, Brian Jean, Dave MacKenzie, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

At 11:10 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 11:14 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 78 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti —  1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 79 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 80 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 


That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 81 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 82 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 83 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 


The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 84 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 85 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 86 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 87 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 88 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 89 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 90 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 91 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 92 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 93 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 94 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 95 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 96 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 97 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 98 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 99 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 100 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 101 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 102 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 103 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 104 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 105 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 106 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 107 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 108 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 109 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 110 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 111 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 112 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 113 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 114 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 115 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 116 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 117 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 118 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 119 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 120 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 121 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 122 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 123 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 124 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 125 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 126 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 127 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 128 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 129 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 130 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 131 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 132 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 133 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 134 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 135 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 136 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Christine Moore, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 137 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 138 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 139 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 140 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 141 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 142 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 143 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 144 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 145 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 146 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 147 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 148 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 149 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 150 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 151 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 152 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 153 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

“into force 154 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

“into force 155 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 156 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 157 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 158 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 159 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 160 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 161 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 162 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 163 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 164 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 165 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 166 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 167 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 168 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 169 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 170 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 171 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 172 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 173 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 174 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 175 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 176 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 177 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 178 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 179 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 180 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 181 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 182 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 183 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 184 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 185 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti —  1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 186 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 187 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 188 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 189 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 190 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 191 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 192 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Michelle Rempel, Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, Brian Jean, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Philip Toone, Glenn Thibeault — 10.

At 12:23 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 12:39 a.m., the sitting resumed.

 

At 12:39 a.m., James Rajotte took the Chair.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 193 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 194 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan  —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 195 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 196 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 197 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 198 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 199 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 200 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 201 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 202 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 203 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 204 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 205 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 206 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 207 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 208 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 209 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 210 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 211 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 212 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 213 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 214 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 215 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 216 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 217 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 218 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 219 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 220 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 221 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 222 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 223 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 224 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 225 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 226 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 227 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Kellie Leitch, David Wilks, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Stella Ambler, Tarik Brahmi, Philip Toone, Rathika Sitsabaiesan, Glenn Thibeault —10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 228 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

At 12:57 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 1:14 a.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 229 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 230 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 231 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 232 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 233 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 234 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 235 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 236 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti —  1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 237 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 238 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 239 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 240 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 241 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 242 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 243 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 244 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 245 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 246 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti —  1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 247 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 248 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 249 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 250 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 251 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 252 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 253 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 254 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 255 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 256 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 257 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 258 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 259 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 260 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 261 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 


The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 262 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 263 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 264 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 265 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 266 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 267 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 268 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 269 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 270 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti —  1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 271 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 272 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 273 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 274 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 275 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 276 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 277 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 278 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 279 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 280 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 281 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 282 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 283 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 284 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 285 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 286 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 287 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 288 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 289 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 290 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 291 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 292 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 


That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 293 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 294 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 295 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 


The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 296 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 297 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 298 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 299 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 300 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 301 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 302 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 303 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 304 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 305 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 306 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 307 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 308 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 309 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 310 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 311 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 312 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 313 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 314 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 315 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 316 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 317 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 318 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 319 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 


The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 320 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 321 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 322 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 323 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 324 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti —  1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 325 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 326 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 327 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 328 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 329 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 330 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 331 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 332 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 333 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 334 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 335 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 336 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 337 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 338 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 339 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 340 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 341 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 


That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 342 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 343 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 344 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 345 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 346 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Massimo Pacetti — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 347 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 348 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 349 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 


The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 350 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 351 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 352 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 353 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 354 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 355 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 356 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 357 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 358 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 359 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 360 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 361 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 362 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 363 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 232, be amended by replacing lines 38 and 39 on page 246 with the following:

 

 

 

“into force 364 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Philip Toone, Hoang Mai, Tarik Brahmi — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 232 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Philip Toone, Hoang Mai, Tarik Brahmi, Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 11; NAYS — 0.

 

 

Clause 233 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 234 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 235 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 236 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 237 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 238 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 239 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 240 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 241 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 242 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 243 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 244 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 245 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 246 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 247 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 248 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 249 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 250 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 251 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 252 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 253 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 254 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 255 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 256 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 257 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 258 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 259 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 260 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 261 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 262 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 263 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards , Mauril Bélanger — 7; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 264 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 265,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 265, be amended by deleting lines 18 to 22 on page 258.

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 265, be amended by deleting lines 18 to 22 on page 258.

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 265, be amended by deleting lines 23 to 28 on page 258.

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 265 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 266, be amended by replacing line 29 on page 259 with the following:

 

 

 

“given under subsection (1) and, with respect to any personal information given that is not necessary for lawful investigation activities, establishing the requirement to dispose of that information within  two years after it is collected.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 266 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 267,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 267, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 260 with the following:

 

 

 

“conveyance and shall establish, with respect to any personal information that is given as prescribed but that is not necessary for enforcement or intelligence activities, the requirement to dispose of that information within  two years after it was collected.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 267 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 268,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 268, be amended by adding after  line 19 on page 260 the following:

 

 

 

“(2) No later than three years after the coming into force of sections 264 and 266, the appropriate committee of each House, as determined by the rules of that House, is to review the impact of those sections on privacy rights.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 268 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 269 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 270 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 271 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 272 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 273 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 274 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 275 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 276,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 276, be amended by replacing line 10 on page 263 with the following:

 

 

 

“province that the council considers appro-”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 276, be amended by replacing line 16 on page 263 with the following:

 

 

 

“in that province that the council considers”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 276, be amended by replacing lines 32 to 35 on page 263 with the following:

 

 

 

“(3.1) No person shall be included on a list referred to in subparagraph (3)(a)(i) or (ii) without the approval of the Minister.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 276 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 277 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 278 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 279 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 280 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 281,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 281, be amended by adding after  line 39 on page 265 the following:

 

 

 

“51. (1) The Minister shall prepare an annual  report on the hazardous materials information review activities during that year and, within four months after the termination of each year, shall cause a copy of the

report to be laid before each House of Parliament.

(2) The Minister shall send a copy of the

report to the lieutenant governor of each

province forthwith after a copy of the report is laid before a House of Parliament under subsection

(1).”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5; NAYS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 281 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 282 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 283 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 284 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 285 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 286 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 287 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 288 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 289 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Kellie Leitch, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Randy Hoback, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

At 2:52 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 3:18 a.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

Clause 290 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 291 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 292 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 293 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 294 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 295 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 296 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 297 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Laurie Hawn, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Blake Richards, David Wilks, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS:  Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Mauril Bélanger — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 298,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force on the day following the day this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force two days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force three days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force four days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force five days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force six days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force seven days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force eight days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force nine days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 10 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 11 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 12 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 13 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks— 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 14 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 15 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 16 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 17 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 18 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 19 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 20 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 21 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 22 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 23 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 24 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 25 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 26 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 27 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 28 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 29 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 30 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 31 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 32 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 33 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 34 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 35 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 36 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 37 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 38 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 39 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 40 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 41 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 42 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 43 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 44 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 45 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 46 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 47 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 48 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 49 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 50 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 51 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 52 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 53 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 54 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 55 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 56 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 57 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 58 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 59 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 60 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 61 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 62 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 63 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 64 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 65 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 66 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 67 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 68 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 69 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 70 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 71 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 72 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 73 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 74 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 75 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 76 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 77 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 78 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 79 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 80 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 81 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 82 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 83 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 84 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 85 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 86 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 87 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 88 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 89 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 90 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 91 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 92 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 93 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 94 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 95 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 96 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 97 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 98 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 99 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 100 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 101 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 102 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 103 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 104 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 105 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 106 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 107 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 108 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 109 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 110 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 111 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 112 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 113 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 114 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 115 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 116 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 117 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 118 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 119 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 120 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 121 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 122 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 123 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 124 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 125 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 126 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 127 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 128 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 129 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 130 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 131 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 132 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 133 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 134 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 135 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 136 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 137 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 138 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 139 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 140 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 141 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 142 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 143 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 144 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 145 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 146 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 147 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 148 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 149 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 150 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 151 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 152 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 153 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 154 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 155 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 156 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 157 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 158 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 159 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 160 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 161 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 162 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 163 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 164 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 165 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 166 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 167 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 168 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 169 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 170 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 171 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 172 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 173 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 174 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 175 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 176 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 177 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 178 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 179 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 180 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

“comes into force 181 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 182 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 183 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 184 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 185 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 186 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 187 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 188 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 189 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 190 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 191 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 192 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 193 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 194 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 195 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 196 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 197 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 198 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 199 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 200 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 201 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 202 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 203 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 204 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 205 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 206 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 207 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 208 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 209 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 210 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 211 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 212 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 213 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 214 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 215 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 216 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 217 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 218 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 219 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 220 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 221 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 222 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 223 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 224 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 225 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 226 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 227 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 228 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 229 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 230 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 231 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 232 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 233 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 234 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 235 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 236 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 237 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 238 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 239 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 240 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 241 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 242 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 243 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 244 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 245 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 246 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 247 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 248 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Kerry-Lynne D. Findlay, Laurie Hawn, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Blake Richards, Philip Toone, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 10.

At 5:02 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 5:15 a.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 249 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 250 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 251 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 252 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 253 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 254 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 255 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 256 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 257 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 258 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 259 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 260 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 261 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 262 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 263 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 264 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 265 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 266 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 267 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 268 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 269 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 270 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 271 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 272 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 273 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 274 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 275 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 276 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 277 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 278 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 279 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 280 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 281 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 282 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 283 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 284 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 285 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 286 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 287 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 288 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 289 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 290 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 291 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 292 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 293 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 294 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 295 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 296 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 297 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 298 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 299 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 300 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 301 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 302 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 303 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 304 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 305 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 306 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 307 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 308 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 309 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 310 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 311 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 312 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 313 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 314 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 315 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 316 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 317 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 318 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 319 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 320 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 321 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 322 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 323 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 324 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 325 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 326 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 327 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 328 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 329 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 330 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 331 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 332 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 333 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 334 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 335 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 336 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 337 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 338 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 339 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 340 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 341 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 342 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 343 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 344 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 345 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 346 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 347 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 348 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 349 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 350 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 351 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 352 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 353 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 354 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 355 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 356 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 357 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 358 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 359 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 360 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 361 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 362 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 363 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 298, be amended by replacing lines 2 and 3 on page 270 with the following:

 

 

 

“comes into force 364 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

Clause 298 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 299 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 300 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 301 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 302 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 303 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 304 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 305 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 306 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 4.

 

 

 

On Clause 307,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 307, be amended by replacing line 4 on page 272 with the following:

 

“(8.91) If an employer’s premium is $15,000”

 

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 307, be amended by replacing line 9 on page 272 with the following:

 

“P2 — (P1 — P3)”

 

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 307, be amended by adding after  line 14 on page 272 the following:

 

“P3 is the amount of the employer’s portion of the premium refunded for 2011.”

 

The Chair ruled the proposed amendment inadmissible because it infringed on the financial initiative of the Crown, as provided on page 767 of House of Commons Procedure and Practice, Second Edition.

 

 

Clause 307 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 11; NAYS: — 0.

 

 

On Clause 308,

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by replacing lines 32 and 33 on page 272 with the following:

 

 

 

“system or, in accordance with the regulations, by non-electronic means. The”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 308, be amended by adding after  line 5 on page 273 the following:

 

 

 

“(1.02) The requirements established in accordance with subsection (1.01), including any regulations made under subsection 14(3),  only apply for a period of 12 months from the date on which subsection  (1.01) comes into force and, within a further period of six months, the impact and effectiveness of the electronic travel authorization must be assessed and the assessment reported to each House of Parliament.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 308 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 309,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 309, be amended by replacing lines 9 to 12 on page 273 with the following:

 

 

 

“the  regulations must include provisions to provide for non-electronic means of application.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 309 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 310,

 

 

 

Clause 310 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 311,

 

 

 

Clause 311 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5

 

 

 

On Clause 312,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 312, be amended by adding after  line 39 on page 273 the following:

 

 

 

“(3) Within 12 months after the coming into force of subsection (2),  a review shall be conducted of the fees for the provision of services described in that subsection and of the merit of applying the User Fees Act to those fees,  and the review shall be compiled into a report to be tabled in each House of Parliament.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 312 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 313,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 313, be amended by adding after  line 24 on page 274 the following:

 

 

 

“(4) Within 12 months after the coming into force of subsection (3),  a review shall be conducted of the fees for the provision of services described in that subsection and of the merit of applying the User Fees Act to those fees, and the review shall be compiled into a report to be tabled in each House of Parliament.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 313 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 314 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

On New Clause 314.1,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45 be amended by adding after line 19 on page 275 the following new clause:

 

 

 

“314.1 Section 308  comes into force one year after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

On Clause 315,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275 with the following:

 

 

 

“315. The portion of subsection 8(1) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act before paragraph (a) is replaced by the following:

8. (1) No person shall be appointed or continue as President or as a director if that person”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275 with the following:

 

 

 

“315. Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act is replaced by the following:

(c) has reached the age of seventy-five years; or”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275 with the following:

 

 

 

“315. Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act is replaced by the following:

(c) has reached the age of eighty years; or”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275 with the following:

 

 

 

“315. Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act is replaced by the following:

(c) has reached the age of eighty-five years; or”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275 with the following:

 

 

 

“315. Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act is replaced by the following:

(c) has reached the age of ninety years; or”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275 with the following:

 

 

 

“315. Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act is replaced by the following:

(c) has reached the age of ninety-five years; or”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 315, be amended by replacing lines 20 to 24 on page 275 with the following:

 

 

 

“315. Paragraph 8(1)c) of the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act is replaced by the following:

(c) has reached the age of one hundred years; or”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 10.

 

 

 

Clause 315 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Mauril Bélanger, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 7; NAYS: Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 4.

 

 

 

On Clause 316,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 316, be amended by replacing line 27 on page 275 with the following:

 

 

 

“1. This Act may be cited as the Partial Navigation

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 316 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 317,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 317, be amended by adding after  line 22 on page 277 the following:

 

 

 

“(7) Section 2 of the Act is renumbered as subsection 2(1) and is amended by adding the following:

(2) When considering if a decision is in the public interest, the Minister must  consider if it would protect the public right of navigation, including the exercise of that right, and be consistent with the purpose of this Act.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 317, be amended by adding after  line 22 on page 277 the following:

 

 

 

“(7) Section 2 of the Act is renumbered as subsection 2(1) and is amended by adding the following:

(2) When considering if a decision is in the public interest, the Minister shall  consider if it would protect the public right of navigation, including the exercise of that right, and be consistent with the purpose of this Act.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 317 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

On New Clause 317.1,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45 be amended by adding after  line 22 on page 277 the following new clause:

 

 

 

“317.1 The Act is amended by adding the following after section 2.1:

PURPOSE

2.2 The purpose of this Act is

(a) to recognize that the federal government has a role as trustee of public resources; and

(b) to protect navigation by protecting all navigable waters in Canada and the water levels and water flow necessary for navigation.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45 be amended by adding after  line 22 on page 277 the following new clause:

 

 

 

“317.1 The Act is amended by adding the following after section 2.1:

PURPOSE

2.2 The purpose of this Act is

(a) to recognize that the federal government has a role as trustee of public resources; and

(b) to protect navigation by protecting all navigable waters in Canada and the water levels and water flow necessary for navigation.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

On Clause 318,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after  line 25 on page 277 the following:

 

 

 

“SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE

2.2 (1) There is established a committee to be known as the Special Advisory Committee consisting of the following representatives:

(a) two employees of the Department of Transport  designated by the Minister, one of whom is assigned to the Navigable Waters Protection Program;

(b) one employee of the Department of the Environment designated by the Minister of the Environment;

(c) one employee of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans designated by the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans; and

(d) one representative of the Canadian Marine Advisory Council designated by that council.

(2) The committee shall exercise all the powers and perform all the duties and functions

of the Minister under this Act, except those referred to in section 27 and in subsections 28(2) and 29(3).”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Tarik Brahmi — 2; NAYS: Mike Allen, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Hoang Mai, Cathy McLeod, Philip Toone, David Wilks — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended

(a) by replacing line 29 on page 277 with the following:

 

“navigable water”

 

 

(b) by deleting line 32 on page 277 to line 15 on page 278.

 

(c) by replacing line 20 on page 278 with the following:

 

“navigable water”

 

 

(d) by replacing line 42 on page 279 with the following:

 

“navigable water that”

 

 

(e) by replacing line 29 on page 281 with the following:

 

“any navigable water”

 

 

(f) by replacing line 4 on page 282 with the following:

 

“navigable water that”

 

 

(g) by replacing lines 34 and 35 on page 282 with the following:

 

“or across any navigable water only if the construction, placement, ”

 

 

(h) by replacing line 35 on page 283 with the following:

 

“shall immediately”

 

 

(i) by replacing lines 6 and 7 on page 284 with the following:

 

“through or across any navigable water to repair, alter or remove it”

 

 

(j) by replacing line 33 on page 284 with the following:

 

“water — shall”

 

 

(k) by replacing line 15 on page 285 with the following:

 

“— to secure,”

 

 

(l) by replacing line 37 on page 285 with the following:

 

“minor water — or”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 8 to 10 on page 278 with the following:

 

 

“(3) The Minister shall accept the request if he or she determines that it would not, when assessed against the factors listed in subsection 5(4), substantially interfere with navigation, in which case the work is”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 8 to 10 on page 278 with the following:

 

 

 

“(3) The Minister shall give favourable consideration to accepting the request if he or she determines, taking into account the factors listed in subsection 5(4), that it would not substantially interfere with navigation, in which case the work is”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after  line 15 on page 278 the following:

 

 

 

“(4) The Minister shall provide the owner with written reasons for any decision made in response to a request under subsection (1) and shall make those reasons publicly accessible.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by adding after  line 15 on page 278 the following:

 

 

 

“(4) The Minister shall provide the owner with written reasons for any decision made in response to a request under subsection (1) and shall make those reasons publicly accessible.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 13 to 16 on page 279 with the following:

 

 

 

“Minister

 

(a) may require from the owner any additional information that the Minister considers appropriate; and

 

(b) must require from the owner the deposit of any information specified”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing lines 16 to 23 on page 279 with the following:

 

 

 

“(b) the deposit  of all plans in the local land registry

or land titles office or any other place specified

by the Minister and the provision of notice of the proposed work and of the deposit of the plans by advertising

in the Canada Gazette and in one or more newspapers that are published in or near the place where the work is to be constructed.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 279 with the following:

 

 

 

“the owner. The Minister shall provide to the owner and make publicly accessible written reasons for any determination made in relation to the proposal, including a decision to issue or refuse to issue an approval under section 6.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 279 with the following:

 

 

 

“the owner. The Minister shall provide to the owner and make publicly accessible written reasons for any determination made in relation to the proposal, including a decision to issue or refuse to issue an approval under section 6.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 280 with the following:

 

 

 

“Minister and made publicly accessible 30 days before the transfer takes place.

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 318, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 280 with the following:

 

 

 

“Minister and made publicly accessible 30 days before the transfer takes place.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 318 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 319,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 319, be amended by replacing lines 30 and 31 on page 286 with the following:

 

 

 

“than in any minor water — so that, in the Minister's opinion, it”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 319 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 320,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 320, be amended by replacing lines 11 to 13 on page 287 with the following:

 

 

 

“abandoned in any navigable water, other than in any minor water, the Minister may, under the restric-”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 320 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 321,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended

(a) by deleting lines 9 and 10 on page 289.

 

 

 

(b) by adding after  line 7 on page 290 the following:

 

“(1.1) The Governor in Council must make regulations respecting the water levels and water flow necessary for navigation.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended

 

(a) by deleting lines 9 and 10 on page 289.

 

 

 

(b) by adding after  line 7 on page 290 the following:

 

“(1.1) The Governor in Council must make regulations respecting the water levels and water flow necessary for navigation.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended

 

(a) by replacing lines 15 to 17 on page 289 with the following:

 

“through or across any navigable waters, other than any minor waters;”

 

 

(b) by replacing lines 10 to 12 on page 290 with the following:

 

“(b) designating any navigable waters, in whole or in part, as minor waters;”

 

 

(c) by replacing lines 17 to 19 on page 290 with the following:

 

“through or across any navigable waters, other than minor waters; and”

 

 

(d) by deleting lines 1 to 21 on page 291.

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended

(a) by replacing line 9 on page 290 with the following:

 

“(a) designating any works as minor works if it is in the

public interest to do so;”

 

 

(b) by replacing line 12 on page 290 with the following:

 

“listed in the schedule if it is in the public interest to do so;”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended

 

(a) by replacing line 9 on page 290 with the following:

 

“(a) designating any works as minor works if it is in the

public interest to do so;”

 

 

 

(b) by replacing line 12 on page 290 with the following:

 

“listed in the schedule if it is in the public interest to do so;”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after  line 13 on page 291 the following:

 

 

 

“(d) is required for the protection of fish habitat; or

(e) is required for the protection of the environment.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after  line 13 on page 291 the following:

 

 

 

“(2.1) The Governor in Council shall, by regulation, add to the schedule, in relation to a request that is accepted under section 4, any water in, on, over, under, through or across which the work is constructed or placed, or proposed to be constructed or placed.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 321, be amended by adding after  line 21 on page 291 the following:

 

 

 

“(5) Following any amendment to the schedule, the Minister must publish in the Canada Gazette all scientific and administrative research and studies that he or she considered before recommending the amendment.

(6) The requirement referred to in subsection (5) also applies to the schedule as it reads on the day on which this section comes into force.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 321 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

 

 

 

Clause 322 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Tarik Brahmi, Hoang Mai, Philip Toone — 5.

At 6:32 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 6:42 a.m., the sitting resumed.

At 6:42 a.m., Peggy Nash took the Chair.

 

 

 

Clause 323 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 324 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 325 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 326 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 327 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

On Clause 328,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by adding after  line 12 on page 294 the following:

 

 

 

“RIGHT OF ACTION

39.01 An individual may bring an action for damages in public nuisance in respect of any navigable waters, including those listed in the schedule, without the consent of the Attorney General and without establishing special damages if

(a) the individual has suffered or will likely suffer damages as a result of the public nuisance; and

(b) the public nuisance has interfered or will likely interfere with the individual's own right of navigation.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by adding after  line 12 on page 294 the following:

 

 

 

“RIGHT OF ACTION

39.01 An individual may bring an action for damages in public nuisance in respect of any navigable waters, including those listed in the schedule, without the consent of the Attorney General and without establishing special damages if

(a) the individual has suffered or will likely suffer damages as a result of the public nuisance; and

(b) the public nuisance has interfered or will likely interfere with the individual's own right of navigation.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 294 with the following:

 

 

 

“$50,000 in any other case.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 294 with the following:

 

 

 

“$60,000 in any other case.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 328, be amended by replacing line 21 on page 294 with the following:

 

 

 

“$70,000 in any other case.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 328 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 329 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 330 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

On Clause 331,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Clause 331.

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger — 1; NAYS: Mike Allen, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Wayne Marston, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 9.

 

 

 

Clause 331 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

On New Clause 331.1,

 

 

That Bill C-45 be amended by adding after  line 27 on page 300 the following new clause:

 

 

 

Review

331.1 Two years after the coming into force of this section, the Minister must undertake a review of the capacity of the federal and provincial court systems to absorb the increased workload and of the the effect the Navigation Protection Act has had on those court systems.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

On Clause 332,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 332, be amended by deleting lines 19 to 33 on page 301.

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 332 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 333 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 334 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 335 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 336 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 337 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 338 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 339 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 340 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 341 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 342 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 343 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 344 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 345 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 346 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 347 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 348 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 349 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 350 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 351 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 352 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 353 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 354 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, David Wilks — 6; NAYS: Mauril Bélanger, Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston — 4.

At 7:00 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 7:03 a.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

Clause 355 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 356 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 357 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

On Clause 358,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 358, be amended by replacing line 12 on page 309 with the following:

 

 

 

“within 30 days after the decision that is the”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 3; NAYS: Mike Allen, Guy Caron, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 7.

 

 

 

Clause 358 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 359 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 360 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 361 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

On Clause 362,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 362, be amended by adding after  line 27 on page 310 the following:

 

 

 

“(2) This section may not be brought into force until after the Minister designated for the purpose of the Canada Grain Act has tabled a report in the House of Commons that contains the following information:

 

(a) the expected annual cost to the Commission of requiring licensees to obtain a prescribed security in accordance with section 45.1 of the Act;

 

(b) the expected annual cost savings for producers of requiring licensees to obtain a prescribed security; and

 

(c) the percentage of grain produced that is expected to be covered by a prescribed security.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 362 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 363 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 364 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 365 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 366 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 367 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 368 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

On Clause 369,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 369, be amended by replacing line 25 on page 314 with the following:

 

 

 

“cause the grain to be officially inspected or inspected by a third party”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 6; NAYS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 369 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 370 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 371 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 372 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 373 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 374 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 375 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 376 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 377 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 378 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 379 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 380 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 381 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 382 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 383 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 384 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 385 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 386 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 387 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 388 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 389 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 390 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 391 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 392 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 393 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 394 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 395 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 396 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 397 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 398 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 399 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 400 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 401 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 402 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 403 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 404 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 405 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 406 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 407 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 408 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 409 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Laurie Hawn, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Mike Wallace — 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

On Clause 410,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force on the day following the day this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force two days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force three days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force four days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force five days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force six days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force seven days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force eight days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force nine days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 10 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 11 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 12 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 13 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 14 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 15 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 16 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 17 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 18 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 19 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 20 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 21 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 22 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 23 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 24 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 25 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 26 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 27 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 28 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 29 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 30 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 31 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 32 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 33 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 34 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 35 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 36 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 37 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 38 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 39 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 40 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 41 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 42 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 43 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 44 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 45 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 46 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 47 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 48 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 49 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 50 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 51 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 52 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 53 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 54 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 55 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 56 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 57 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 58 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 59 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 60 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 61 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 62 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 63 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 64 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 65 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 66 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 67 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 68 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 69 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 70 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 71 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 72 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 73 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 74 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 75 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 76 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 77 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 78 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 79 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 80 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 81 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 82 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 83 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 84 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 85 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 86 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 87 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 88 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 89 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 90 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 91 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 92 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 93 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 94 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 95 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 96 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 97 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 98 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 99 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 100 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 101 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 102 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 103 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 104 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 105 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 106 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 107 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 108 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 109 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 110 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 111 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 112 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 113 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 114 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 115 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 116 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 117 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 118 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 119 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 120 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 121 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 122 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 123 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 124 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 125 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 126 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 127 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 128 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 129 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 130 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 131 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 132 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 133 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 134 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 135 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 136 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 137 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 138 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 139 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 140 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 141 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 142 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 143 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 144 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 145 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 146 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 147 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 148 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 149 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 150 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 151 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 152 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 153 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 154 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 155 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 156 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 157 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 158 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 159 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 160 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 161 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 162 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 163 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 164 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 165 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 166 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 167 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 168 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

At 8:29 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 8:37 a.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 169 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 170 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 171 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 172 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 173 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 174 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 175 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 176 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 177 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 178 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 179 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 180 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 181 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 182 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 183 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 184 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 185 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 186 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 187 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 188 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 189 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 190 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 191 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 192 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 193 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 194 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 195 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 196 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 197 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 198 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 199 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 200 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 201 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 202 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 203 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 204 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 205 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 206 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 207 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 208 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 209 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 210 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 211 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 212 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 213 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 214 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 215 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 216 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 217 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 218 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 219 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 220 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 221 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 222 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 223 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 224 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 225 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 226 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Corneliu Chisu, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 227 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 228 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 229 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 230 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 231 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 232 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 233 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 234 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 235 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 236 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 237 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 238 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 239 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 240 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 241 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 242 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 243 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 244 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 245 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 246 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 247 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 248 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 249 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 250 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 251 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 252 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

At 9:05 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 9:07 a.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 253 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 254 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 255 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 256 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 257 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 258 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 259 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 260 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 261 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 262 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 263 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Cathy McLeod, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 264 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 265 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 266 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 267 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 268 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 269 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 270 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 271 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 272 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 273 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 274 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 275 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 276 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 277 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 278 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 279 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 280 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 281 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 282 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 283 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 284 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 285 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 286 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 287 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 288 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 289 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 290 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 291 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 292 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 293 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 294 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 295 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 296 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 297 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 298 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 299 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 300 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 301 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 302 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 303 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 304 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 305 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 306 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 307 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 308 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 309 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 310 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 311 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 312 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 313 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 314 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 315 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 316 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 317 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 318 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 319 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 320 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 321 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 322 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 323 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 324 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 325 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 326 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 327 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 328 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 329 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 330 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 331 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 332 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 333 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 334 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 335 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 336 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 337 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 338 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 339 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 340 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 341 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 342 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 343 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 344 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 345 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 346 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 347 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 348 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 349 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 350 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 351 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 352 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 353 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 354 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 355 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 356 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 357 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 358 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 359 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 360 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 361 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 362 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 363 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Geoff Regan — 1; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 410, be amended by replacing lines 18 to 20 on page 331 with the following:

 

 

 

“than sections 390 to 409, come into force 364 days after the day on which this Act receives royal assent.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 410 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Lysane Blanchette-Lamothe, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

 

 

Clause 411 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

Clause 412 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 413 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 414 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 415 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 416 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 417 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 418 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 419 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 420 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 421 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 422 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 423 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 424 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 425 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette — 9; NAYS: Wayne Marston — 1.

 

Clause 426 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 10; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 427 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 10; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 428 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 10; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 429 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 10; NAYS: — 0.

 

Clause 430 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 431 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan, Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 10; NAYS: — 0.

 

On Clause 432,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 432, be amended by deleting lines 43 and 44 on page 335.

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 432, be amended by deleting lines 43 and 44 on page 335.

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

Clause 432 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Geoff Regan — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 433 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

Clause 434 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

Clause 435 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

Clause 436 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

Clause 437 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

On Clause 438,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 438, be amended by replacing lines 25 to 27 on page 342 with the following:

“(3) After receiving the report referred to in section 66.3 and its summary, the Minister shall cause them to be laid before each House of”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

That Bill C-45, in Clause 438, be amended by adding after  line 29 on page 342 the following:

“(4) The report and summary laid before Parliament stand permanently referred to any parliamentary committee that may be designated or established to review matters relating to employment insurance.”


The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

Clause 438 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

Clause 439 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

Clause 440 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

Clause 441 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.


 

Clause 442 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

Clause 443 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

Clause 444 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

On Clause 445,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 445, be amended by adding after  line 15 on page 348 the following:

“(2) After receiving a report submitted under subsection (1), the Minister shall cause it to be laid before each

House of Parliament on any of the next 15 days

during which that House is sitting.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

Clause 445 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, Geoff Regan — 4.

 

Clause 446 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 447 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 448 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 449 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 450 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 451 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 452 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 453 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 454 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 455 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 456 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 457 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 458 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 459 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 460, be amended by replacing lines 43 and 44 on page 350 with the following:

“General of Canada, who must submit  a report of the audit to the Minister.

(2) After receiving the report referred to in subsection (1), the Minister shall cause it to be laid before each House of Parliament on any of the next 15 days during which that House is sitting.”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 3; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, Guy Caron — 7.

 

Clause 460 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 461 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 462 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 463 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

Clause 464 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 465 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 466 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 467 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 468 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 469 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 470 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 471 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 472 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 473 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

On Clause 474,

 

Clause 474 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Scott Armstrong, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 475 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 476 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 477 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 478 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 479 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 480 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 481 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 482 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 483 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 484 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 485 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 486 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 487 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 488 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 489 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 490 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 491 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 492 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 493 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 494 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 495 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 496 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 497 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 498 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 499 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 500 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 501 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 502 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 503 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: M Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 504 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 505 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 506 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 507 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 508 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 509 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 510 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 511 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 512 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 513 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 514 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren, John McCallum — 7; NAYS: Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 3.

 

Clause 515 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren— 6; NAYS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4.

 

On Clause 516,

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 516, be amended by replacing lines 30 and 31 on page 389 with the following:

“Agency must consult with the President of the Treasury”

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Denis Blanchette, Guy Caron, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren— 6.

 

Clause 516 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren— 6; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren— 4

 

Schedule 1 carried on division.

 

On Schedule 2,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45 be amended by deleting Schedule 2.

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: John McCallum — 1; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren,  Guy Caron, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston — 9.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 6 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “6.1”

Column 1: “Crystal Lake”

Column 2: “51o27'29" N,  120o45'29" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 6 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “6.1”

Column 1: “Sheridan Lake”

Column 2: “51o31'09" N,  120o53'43" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 6 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “6.1”

Column 1: “Thomson Lake”

Column 2: “51o49'59" N,  120o58'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 7 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “7.1”

Column 1: “Eugene Lake”

Column 2: “51o27'00" N,  120o42'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in  Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 7 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “7.1”

Column 1: “Montana Lake”

Column 2: “51o25'59" N,  120o39'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 7 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “7.1”

Column 1: “Rutherford Lake”

Column 2: “51o28'00" N,  120o44'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 7 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “7.1”

Column 1: “Webb Lakes”

Column 2: “51o28'00" N,  120o40'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Akehurst Lake”

Column 2: “51o19'59" N,  120o28'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Azure Lake”

Column 2: “52o22'59" N,  120o07'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item : “8.1”

Column 1: “Bonaparte Lake”

Column 2: “51o15'00" N,  120o34'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Caribou Lake”

Column 2: “51o01'59" N,  120o28'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in  Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Caverhill Lake”

Column 2: “51o19'59" N,  120o24'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Clearwater Lake”

Column 2: “52o16'00" N,  120o13'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Heller Lake”

Column 2: “51o09'29" N,  120o34'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Lupin Lakes”

Column 2: “51o16'59" N,  120o22'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Machete Lake”

Column 2: “51o22'59" N,  120o34'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Mahood Lake”

Column 2: “51o55'00" N,  120o24'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Mayson Lake”

Column 2: “51o13'44" N,  120o24'38" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Jinny Jogindera Sims, Denis Blanchette, Wayne Marston, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Dan Albas, Mike Wallace, Peter Braid, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

At 10:38 a.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 12:19 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

At 12:19 p.m., James Rajotte took the Chair.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Otter Lake”

Column 2: “51o31'59" N,  120o40'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Tobe Lake”

Column 2: “51o25'59" N,  120o32'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 8 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “8.1”

Column 1: “Wilson Lake”

Column 2: “51o31'00" N,  120o39'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 10 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “10.1”

Column 1: “Adams Lake”

Column 2: “51o10'00" N,  119o34'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 10 on page 392 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “10.1”

Column 1: “Murtle Lake”

Column 2: “52o07'59" N,  119o37'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 2 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 15 on page 400 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “15.1”

Column 1: “Seine River”

Column 2: “49o53'58" N,  97o08'21" W”

Column 3: “49o22'37" N,  96o06'31" W”

Column 4: “From the Sandilands Provincial Forest to the Red River Spillway”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 17 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “17.1”

Column 1: “Lesser Slave Lake”

Column 2: “55o26' 25" N,  115o29'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 17 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “17.1”

Column 1: “Peerless Lake”

Column 2: “56o36'59" N,  114o40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 17 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “17.1”

Column 1: “Utikuma Lake”

Column 2: “55o49'59" N,  115o25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 18 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “18.1”

Column 1: “Calling Lake”

Column 2: “55o14'31" N,  113o18'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 18 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “18.1”

Column 1: “Lac La Biche”

Column 2: “54o51'22" N,  112o03'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 18 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “18.1”

Column 1: “Lake Claire”

Column 2: “58o34'59" N,  112o04'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 18 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “18.1”

Column 1: “North Wabasca Lake”

Column 2: “56o02'54" N,  113o54'33" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 19 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “19.1”

Column 1: “Lake Tobin”

Column 2: “53o35'00" N,  103o30'01" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 19 on page 393 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “19.1”

Column 1: “Winnifred Lake”

Column 2: “59o13'52" N,  110o24'21" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Horners Lake”

Column 2: “50°13'30" N,  100°01'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Slater Lake”

Column 2: “50°42'49" N,  100°10'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mispetoon Lake”

Column 2: “52°30'31" N,  100°10'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kelly Lake”

Column 2: “52°06'58" N,  100°10'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cedar Lake”

Column 2: “53°19'45" N,  100°10'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Polly Lake”

Column 2: “49°00'49" N,  100°12'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mwoak Lake”

Column 2: “55°35'36" N,  100°12'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Karrak Lake”

Column 2: “67°15'00" N,  100°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Slaughterhouse Lakes”

Column 2: “49°01'16" N,  100°17'22" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Morins Lake”

Column 2: “49°00'26" N,  100°18'15" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Garry Lake”

Column 2: “65°58'00" N,  100°18'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Stadnyks Lake”

Column 2: “50°38'04" N,  100°20'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Angikuni Lake”

Column 2: “62°12'00" N,  99°59'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Morton Lake”

Column 2: “50°32'54" N,  100°23'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pump Lake”

Column 2: “56°53'28" N,  100°26'12" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Granville Lake”

Column 2: “56°17'59" N,  100°28'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Blue Lake”

Column 2: “49°04'58" N,  100°30'46" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Warrens Lake”

Column 2: “50°25'52" N,  100°30'50" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Skunk Lake”

Column 2: “54°08'00" N,  100°34'37" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bower Lake”

Column 2: “49°03'21" N,  100°04'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kapiskitowakomak Lake”

Column 2: “53°57'53" N,  100°40'44" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Swan Lake”

Column 2: “52°29'58" N,  100°43'44" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Dunsheath Lake”

Column 2: “57°03'17" N,  100°46'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Upper Garry Lake”

Column 2: “65°50'00" N,  100°48'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Armark Lake”

Column 2: “66°29'00" N,  100°50'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Triple Lake”

Column 2: “51°20'10" N,  100°59'28" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mencini Lake”

Column 2: “58°30'59" N,  101°00'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Veronica Lake”

Column 2: “56°53'12" N,  101°10'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Summit Lake”

Column 2: “56°37'05" N,  101°12'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Horn Lake”

Column 2: “52°28'45" N,  101°15'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Burrows Lake”

Column 2: “51°25'35" N,  101°02'54" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ennadai Lake”

Column 2: “60°58'00” N, 101°20'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Carlson Lake”

Column 2: “57°25'34” N, 101°24'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wolf Lakes”

Column 2: “52°21'20” N, 101°26'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bog Lake”

Column 2: “52°57'29” N, 101°30'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Armit Lake”

Column 2: “52°32'55” N, 101°35'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pistol Lake”

Column 2: “54°54'33” N, 101°36'36" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Princess Beatrice Lake”

Column 2: “55°25'19” N, 101°38'55" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Waterbury Lake”

Column 2: “55°31'00” N, 101°47'33" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cliff Lake”

Column 2: “54°48'41” N, 101°50'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Trickett Lake”

Column 2: “52°28'00” N, 101°52'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Saskoba Lake”

Column 2: “54°27'30” N, 101°53'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Diamond Lake”

Column 2: “50°38'15” N, 101°09'17" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kamilukuak Lake”

Column 2: “62°28'16” N, 102°00'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Reindeer Lake”

Column 2: “57°20'00” N, 102°00'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Skeleton Lake”

Column 2: “49°49'00” N, 102°14'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Batty Lake”

Column 2: “54°48'00” N, 102°14'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Arlone Lake”

Column 2: “67°23'00” N, 102°14'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Amisk Lake”

Column 2: “54°35'00” N, 102°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Denis Blanchette, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “McLellan Lake”

Column 2: “49°50'00” N, 102°23'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Whitbread Lake”

Column 2: “54°59'00” N, 102°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Rudolph Lake”

Column 2: “56°35'00” N, 102°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pikusikun Lake”

Column 2: “58°53'00” N, 102°28'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pagato Lake”

Column 2: “56°08'00” N, 102°30'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lawton Lake”

Column 2: “58°32'00” N, 102°33'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Boyer Lake”

Column 2: “59°16'00” N, 102°36'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “MacAlpine Lake”

Column 2: “66°32'00” N, 102°45'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Croome Lake”

Column 2: “65°48'00” N, 102°47'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Dubawnt Lake”

Column 2: “63°03'46” N, 102°05'47" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Wayne Marston, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Gilbert Lake”

Column 2: “55°51'00” N, 102°51'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

At 12:46 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 12:47 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bourassa Lake”

Column 2: “53°37'00” N, 102°54'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hewgill Lake”

Column 2: “59°22'00” N, 102°54'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Snowbird Lake”

Column 2: “60°41'01” N, 102°56'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kasba Lake”

Column 2: “60°18'01” N, 102°07'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Limestone Lake”

Column 2: “54°38'00” N, 103°13'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wollaston Lake”

Column 2: “58°15'00” N, 103°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “White Lake”

Column 2: “56°00'00” N, 103°16'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cross Lake”

Column 2: “56°47'00” N, 103°02'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Deschambault Lake”

Column 2: “54°47'00” N, 103°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Obre Lake”

Column 2: “60°22'01” N, 103°03'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nixon Lake”

Column 2: “61°34'01” N, 103°39'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pointer Lake”

Column 2: “55°38'00” N, 103°45'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Blackman Lake”

Column 2: “56°28'00” N, 103°48'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Dwyer Lake”

Column 2: “57°57'00” N, 103°53'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wholdaia Lake”

Column 2: “60°43'01” N, 104°10'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Howitson Lake”

Column 2: “55°32'00” N, 104°18'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cadot Lake”

Column 2: “52°18'00” N, 104°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Firedrake Lake”

Column 2: “61°25'01” N, 104°30'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Selwyn Lake”

Column 2: “60°00'00” N, 104°30'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sid Lake”

Column 2: “62°16'01” N, 104°04'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Andrew Hastings Lake”

Column 2: “55°56'00” N, 104°47'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Biologist Lake”

Column 2: “64°16'36” N, 104°05'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Contact Lake”

Column 2: “55°25'00” N, 104°52'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wolf Lake”

Column 2: “51°15'00” N, 104°08'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kipabiskau Lake”

Column 2: “52°34'00” N, 104°09'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “La Ronge Lake”

Column 2: “55°10'00” N, 105°00'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Old Lake”

Column 2: “53°28'00” N, 105°12'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Keith Lake”

Column 2: “55°59'00” N, 105°12'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Black Lake”

Column 2: “59°12'00” N, 105°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mountain Lake”

Column 2: “60°54'01” N, 105°20'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Middle Foster Lake”

Column 2: “56°38'00” N, 105°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Petallen Lake”

Column 2: “49°53'00” N, 105°28'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Beauvais Lake”

Column 2: “60°27'01” N, 105°31'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, Paul Calandra, Mike Wallace, Mike Allen, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

At 12:58 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 1:02 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Vermette Lake”

Column 2: “61°22'01” N, 105°38'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Montreal Lake”

Column 2: “54°20'00” N, 105°40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kitiga Lake”

Column 2: “69°15'00” N, 105°40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Coyne Lake”

Column 2: “61°30'01” N, 105°05'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bodie Lake”

Column 2: “62°58'01” N, 105°52'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Jean Lake”

Column 2: “53°37'00” N, 105°53'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fuchs Lake”

Column 2: “55°34'00” N, 105°56'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mary Frances Lake”

Column 2: “63°19'01” N, 106°13'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Dymond Lake”

Column 2: “61°25'01” N, 106°14'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pearce Lake”

Column 2: “55°58'00” N, 106°16'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Porter Lake”

Column 2: “52°12'00” N, 106°17'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Penylan Lake”

Column 2: “61°50'01” N, 106°20'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “LaHaise Lake”

Column 2: “61°58'01” N, 106°20'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Odin Lake”

Column 2: “60°38'01” N, 106°23'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cree Lake”

Column 2: “57°30'00” N, 106°30'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Smyth Lake”

Column 2: “55°13'00” N, 106°33'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pinehouse Lake”

Column 2: “55°32'00” N, 106°35'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Healey Lake”

Column 2: “64°20'01” N, 106°45'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Oman Lake”

Column 2: “59°42'00” N, 106°45'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Musclow Lake”

Column 2: “63°47'01” N, 106°57'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hunting Lake”

Column 2: “54°18'00” N, 106°59'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fraser Lake”

Column 2: “61°00'01” N, 106°07'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Music Lake”

Column 2: “56°09'00” N, 107°11'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Glew Lake”

Column 2: “54°11'00” N, 107°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Belton Lake”

Column 2: “55°32'00” N, 107°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Doré Lake”

Column 2: “54°46'00” N, 107°17'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Clinton-Colden Lake”

Column 2: “63°55'01” N, 107°29'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fabien Lake”

Column 2: “62°58'01” N, 107°37'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Northring Lake”

Column 2: “64°57'00” N, 107°48'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Camp Lake”

Column 2: “53°26'00” N, 107°05'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Yackle Lake”

Column 2: “57°06'00” N, 107°51'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fishing Lake”

Column 2: “66°40'00” N, 107°51'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Artillery Lake”

Column 2: “63°09'01” N, 107°52'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Aitch Lake”

Column 2: “65°35'30” N, 107°54'15" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tarantula Lake”

Column 2: “64°32'01” N, 107°58'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fishpoint Lake”

Column 2: “54°08'00” N, 107°06'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lamarre Lake”

Column 2: “61°55'01” N, 107°08'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sorenson Lake”

Column 2: “60°50'01” N, 108°10'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kunes Lake”

Column 2: “67°19'00” N, 109°36'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Primrose Lake”

Column 2: “54°55'00” N, 109°45'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ghurka Lake”

Column 2: “65°01'00” N, 109°05'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Anarin Lake”

Column 2: “63°28'01” N, 109°54'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Misteagun Lake”

Column 2: “63°17'01” N, 110°10'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Banning Lake”

Column 2: “69°35'00” N, 110°10'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “MacLellan Lake”

Column 2: “63°15'01” N, 110°02'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “MacKay Lake”

Column 2: “63°55'05” N, 110°25'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Quartermoon Lake”

Column 2: “65°01'00” N, 108°12'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qiviut Lake”

Column 2: “65°45'55” N, 108°14'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Frobisher Lake”

Column 2: “56°20'00” N, 108°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “McArter Lake”

Column 2: “56°52'00” N, 108°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Moore Lake”

Column 2: “59°02'00” N, 108°02'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Churchill Lake”

Column 2: “55°55'00” N, 108°20'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Aylmer Lake”

Column 2: “64°05'01” N, 108°30'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Millard Lake”

Column 2: “58°09'00” N, 108°34'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Crellin Lake”

Column 2: “57°58'00” N, 108°36'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bayley Lake”

Column 2: “59°04'00” N, 108°37'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mackey Lake”

Column 2: “59°54'00” N, 108°04'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nero Lake”

Column 2: “59°31'00” N, 108°40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wren Lake”

Column 2: “60°20'01” N, 108°42'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Polynia Lake”

Column 2: “75°07'00” N, 108°43'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Peter Pond Lake”

Column 2: “55°55'00” N, 108°44'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Green Lake”

Column 2: “59°38'00” N, 108°44'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lunar Lake”

Column 2: “65°12'50” N, 108°50'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Migration Lake”

Column 2: “64°58'00” N, 108°51'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Blow Lake”

Column 2: “59°35'00” N, 108°52'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Halliday Lake”

Column 2: “61°21'01” N, 108°56'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kadman Lake”

Column 2: “59°33'00” N, 108°56'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Dalgliesh Lake”

Column 2: “60°01'01” N, 108°57'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tarpon Lake”

Column 2: “64°45'01” N, 109°00'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Grampus Lake”

Column 2: “60°38'01” N, 109°12'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ingebrigt Lake”

Column 2: “50°22'00” N, 109°19'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hjalmar Lake”

Column 2: “61°33'01” N, 109°25'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nonacho Lake”

Column 2: “61°59'01” N, 109°28'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Alexander Lake”

Column 2: “59°37'25” N, 110°28'49" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Leane Lake”

Column 2: “52°33'54” N, 110°03'43" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de Gras”

Column 2: “64°30'01” N, 110°30'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Benna Thy Lake”

Column 2: “60°38'01” N, 110°33'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hidden Lake”

Column 2: “53°21'12” N, 110°38'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Jerome Lake”

Column 2: “54°03'49” N, 110°42'44" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Benjamin Lake”

Column 2: “63°13'00” N, 110°45'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Contwoyto Lake”

Column 2: “65°42'01” N, 110°50'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Berens Lake”

Column 2: “60°23'01” N, 110°50'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ogilvie Lake”

Column 2: “62°17'01” N, 110°52'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hanging Ice Lake”

Column 2: “60°13'01” N, 110°55'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Thekulthili Lake”

Column 2: “61°00'01” N, 110°06'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sandhill Lake”

Column 2: “62°17'01” N, 110°08'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Augustine Lake”

Column 2: “61°05'01” N, 111°13'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pettit Lake”

Column 2: “61°40'01” N, 111°15'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hilltop Lake”

Column 2: “63°21'00” N, 111°02'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fly Lake”

Column 2: “65°41'00” N, 111°20'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wishbone Lake”

Column 2: “65°40'00” N, 111°26'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qalgiliumaniq”

Column 2: “71°37'02” N, 111°05'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bat Lake”

Column 2: “54°38'54” N, 111°58'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Deskenatlata Lake”

Column 2: “61°03'01” N, 111°58'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Field Lake”

Column 2: “54°43'42” N, 111°59'17" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fingers Lake”

Column 2: “65°43'00” N, 111°09'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Rupp Lake”

Column 2: “63°50'01” N, 112°15'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Faulkner Lake”

Column 2: “62°11'01” N, 112°17'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Delmar Lake”

Column 2: “63°08'01” N, 112°02'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Credit Lake”

Column 2: “64°39'01” N, 112°30'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Windy Lake”

Column 2: “54°35'54” N, 112°35'41" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Chipp Lake”

Column 2: “62°28'01” N, 112°38'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cleft Lake”

Column 2: “62°29'01” N, 112°40'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hanikahimajuk Lake”

Column 2: “66°04'50” N, 112°42'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mad Lake”

Column 2: “62°07'01” N, 112°45'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bud Lake”

Column 2: “62°20'01” N, 112°47'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lockhart Lake”

Column 2: “63°40'01” N, 112°05'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lake Claire”

Column 2: “58°35'00" N,  112°05'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bambi Lake”

Column 2: “62°59'01" N,  112°54'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Consolation Lake”

Column 2: “62°32'01" N,  112°55'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Garnett Lake”

Column 2: “63°30'01" N,  112°58'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Big Lake”

Column 2: “64°51'01" N,  113°00'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Napaktulik Lake”

Column 2: “66°20'00" N,  113°00'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Saunders Lake”

Column 2: “62°37'01" N,  113°12'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Dome Lake”

Column 2: “62°46'01" N,  113°16'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Imaq”

Column 2: “70°16'02" N,  113°25'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Chipewyan Lakes”

Column 2: “56°57'00" N,  113°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Angelique Lake”

Column 2: “64°38'01" N,  113°26'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Preble Lake”

Column 2: “59°58'44" N,  113°27'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hingilik Lake”

Column 2: “66°32'15" N,  113°29'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Criss Lake”

Column 2: “63°05'01" N,  113°31'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Prestige Lake”

Column 2: “62°57'01" N,  113°39'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Baldhead Lake”

Column 2: “64°37'01" N,  113°39'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Thoolezzeh Lake”

Column 2: “64°03'01" N,  113°04'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Point Lake”

Column 2: “65°15'01" N,  113°04'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bliss Lake”

Column 2: “62°39'01" N,  113°43'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Elbow Lake”

Column 2: “62°33'01" N,  113°05'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Victory Lake”

Column 2: “62°40'01" N,  113°05'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Alderson Lake”

Column 2: “49°01'47" N,  113°58'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Webb Lake”

Column 2: “62°51'01" N,  113°06'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Woodenpan Lake”

Column 2: “53°27'43" N,  113°09'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Walsh Lake”

Column 2: “62°35'01" N,  114°16'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Greyling Lake”

Column 2: “62°41'01" N,  114°17'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Morris Lake”

Column 2: “63°06'01" N,  114°02'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “One Arm Lake”

Column 2: “62°33'01" N,  114°20'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Vee Lake”

Column 2: “62°33'11" N,  114°21'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Octopus Lake”

Column 2: “62°22'31" N,  114°27'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sandy Lake”

Column 2: “60°31'30" N,  114°35'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ethel Lake”

Column 2: “53°46'54" N,  114°52'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Elbow Lake”

Column 2: “50°38'23" N,  115°00'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Corner Lake”

Column 2: “64°19'01" N,  115°10'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fortune Lake”

Column 2: “64°27'01" N,  115°11'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pete Lake”

Column 2: “64°07'01" N,  115°11'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Valley Lake”

Column 2: “66°45'00" N,  115°11'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cranston Lake”

Column 2: “64°21'01" N,  115°12'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mayurlihuk”

Column 2: “71°27'11" N,  115°13'31" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Schwerdt Lake”

Column 2: “64°23'01" N,  115°16'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Canoe Lake”

Column 2: “67°00'30" N,  115°18'10" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sphinx Lake”

Column 2: “64°28'01" N,  115°22'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Margaret Lake”

Column 2: “58°57'13" N,  115°24'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lesser Slave Lake”

Column 2: “55°26'26" N,  115°29'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Buffalo Lake”

Column 2: “60°13'00" N,  115°30'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tundra Lake”

Column 2: “67°25'40" N,  115°32'50" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Acasta Lake”

Column 2: “65°22'01" N,  115°33'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Rodrigues Lake”

Column 2: “64°47'01" N,  115°38'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Spanner Lake”

Column 2: “64°27'01" N,  115°04'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Gossan Lake”

Column 2: “64°28'01" N,  115°47'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Damoti Lake”

Column 2: “64°11'01" N,  115°05'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Alford Lake”

Column 2: “52°04'00" N,  115°05'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Baseline Lake”

Column 2: “54°14'02" N,  115°54'49" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tahiryuhuk”

Column 2: “70°37'17" N,  115°57'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Louis Lake”

Column 2: “52°24'44" N,  115°07'36" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Niaqualuk”

Column 2: “70°38'44" N,  116°01'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Strutt Lake”

Column 2: “63°20'01" N,  116°14'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bent Lake”

Column 2: “65°04'01" N,  116°15'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Three Islands Lake”

Column 2: “67°21'00" N,  116°22'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Shoti Lake”

Column 2: “63°07'01" N,  116°26'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Crapeau Lake”

Column 2: “64°49'01" N,  116°27'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Grant  Lake”

Column 2: “64°54'01" N,  116°30'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Peltier  Lake”

Column 2: “66°07'01" N,  116°35'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wopmay  Lake”

Column 2: “65°07'01" N,  116°40'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Elbow  Lake”

Column 2: “67°27'00" N,  116°51'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ketcheson Lake”

Column 2: “63°52'01" N,  116°52'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nec Lake”

Column 2: “63°17'01" N,  116°53'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hislop Lake”

Column 2: “63°31'01" N,  "116°55'05 W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, John McCallum — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

At 1:57 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 2:13 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cliff Lake”

Column 2: “67°37'00" N,  116°55'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Faber Lake”

Column 2: “63°56'01" N,  117°15'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Self Lake”

Column 2: “65°18'01" N,  117°15'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tahiqpaaluk”

Column 2: “70°58'02" N,  117°19'43" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Second Lake”

Column 2: “62°06'01" N,  117°26'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cruickshanks Lake”

Column 2: “65°55'01" N,  117°26'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Libby Lake”

Column 2: “68°14'00" N,  117°26'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qikiqtalik”

Column 2: “71°34'29" N,  117°32'17" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tathlina Lake”

Column 2: “60°33'00" N,  117°32'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fawn Lake”

Column 2: “62°11'01" N,  117°32'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Goose Lake”

Column 2: “54°58'25" N,  117°32'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sharun Lake”

Column 2: “62°05'01" N,  117°33'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Katauyam tahia”

Column 2: “70°47'33" N,  117°34'01" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qikiqtaqtuuq”

Column 2: “71°54'03" N,  117°34'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Far Lake”

Column 2: “65°59'01" N,  117°45'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Elizabeth Lake”

Column 2: “66°28'01" N, 117°48'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Longtom Lake”

Column 2: “65°10'01" N, 117°50'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Zebulon Lake”

Column 2: “65°03'01" N, 117°50'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Contact Lake”

Column 2: “65°58'01" N, 117°50'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac la Martre”

Column 2: “63°15'01" N, 117°55'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Geraldine Lakes”

Column 2: “52°34'22" N, 117°56'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Malfait Lake”

Column 2: “64°38'01" N, 117°57'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Jim Lake”

Column 2: “66°00'01" N, 117°57'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Gay Lake”

Column 2: “66°01'01" N, 117°57'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bill Fraser Lake”

Column 2: “50°26'43" N, 118°12'54" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Windflower Lake”

Column 2: “62°52'01" N, 118°30'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hottah Lake”

Column 2: “65°04'01" N, 118°30'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bistcho Lake”

Column 2: “59°44'33" N, 118°50'42" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hornell Lake”

Column 2: “62°20'00" N, 119°25'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ukulele Lake”

Column 2: “50°37'38" N, 119°40'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bluenose Lake”

Column 2: “68°25'00" N, 119°45'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ussher Lake”

Column 2: “50°30'31" N, 120°17'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Summit Lake”

Column 2: “49°45'14” N, 120°38'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Small Dairy Lake”

Column 2: “50°37'07” N, 120°40'44" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Knudsen Lake”

Column 2: “54°18'05” N, 120°46'15" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Scot Lake”

Column 2: “51°15'25” N, 120°47'51" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Succour Lake”

Column 2: “51°54'17” N, 120°49'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nicomen Lake”

Column 2: “49°13'31” N, 120°51'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tseepantee Lake”

Column 2: “63°24'00” N, 121°28'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hospital Lakes”

Column 2: “53°04'42” N, 121°29'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Arrowhead Lake”

Column 2: “60°52'30” N, 122°22'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hoagak Lake”

Column 2: “71°33'12” N, 122°23'25" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nothaykay Lake”

Column 2: “63°36'15” N, 122°43'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Seven Islands Lake”

Column 2: “69°17'01” N, 123°00'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bluefish Lake”

Column 2: “61°11'00” N, 123°19'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lost Hill Lake”

Column 2: “65°40'26” N, 123°22'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Betalamea Lake”

Column 2: “60°08'00” N, 123°34'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Rummy Lake”

Column 2: “69°05'01” N, 123°38'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tatui Lake”

Column 2: “65°57'51” N, 123°04'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mid Lake”

Column 2: “61°32'00” N, 123°41'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Carlson Lake”

Column 2: “62°26'00” N, 123°50'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kilekale Lake”

Column 2: “66°39'01” N, 123°59'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pyper Lake”

Column 2: “52°02'35” N, 124°10'38" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tarn Lake”

Column 2: “51°11'39” N, 124°20'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Natalkuz Lake”

Column 2: “53°26'06” N, 125°12'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Picnic Lake”

Column 2: “72°01'06” N, 125°14'31" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Stewart Lake”

Column 2: “64°23'45” N, 125°16'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fish Lake”

Column 2: “64°58'00” N, 125°16'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tate  Lake”

Column 2: “64°30'30” N, 125°21'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Elbow Lake”

Column 2: “52°04'55” N, 125°41'49" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Moxley Lake”

Column 2: “53°47'48” N, 125°46'15" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tunago Lake”

Column 2: “66°19'00” N, 125°50'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bell Heather Lake”

Column 2: “62°20'00” N, 125°51'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kidney Lake”

Column 2: “52°09'26” N, 125°52'47" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tweed Lake”

Column 2: “66°47'00” N, 125°53'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Nycole Turmel, Dan Harris, Scott Simms — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Shelly Glover, LaVar Payne, Laurie Hawn, Mike Allen, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mendo Lake”

Column 2: “65°56'00” N, 125°06'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac des Bois”

Column 2: “66°50'01” N, 125°09'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Colville Lake”

Column 2: “67°10'00” N, 126°00'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Babine Lake”

Column 2: “54°45'00” N, 126°00'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Edie Lake”

Column 2: “65°17'00” N, 126°33'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fish Running Lake”

Column 2: “65°43'20” N, 126°48'27" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ootsa Lake”

Column 2: “53°46'47” N, 126°08'12" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Heart Lake”

Column 2: “65°12'15” N, 127°10'57" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tadek Lake”

Column 2: “67°02'00” N, 127°23'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Gordon Lakes”

Column 2: “51°17'15” N, 127°30'11" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nightwind Lake”

Column 2: “61°49'00” N, 127°32'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch— 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Canoe Lake”

Column 2: “50°13'44” N, 127°44'44" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Raven Lake”

Column 2: “67°49'00” N, 128°22'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Big Grassy Lake”

Column 2: “68°43'00” N, 128°51'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Manuel Lake”

Column 2: “66°58'00” N, 128°54'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Zenchuk Lake”

Column 2: “62°05'00” N, 128°09'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Foch Lake”

Column 2: “53°47'04” N, 129°11'50" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Peters Lake”

Column 2: “60°36'10” N, 131°43'42" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Leaf Lake”

Column 2: “60°42'09” N, 131°53'25" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Owen Lakes”

Column 2: “68°27'00” N, 132°12'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn,  LaVar Payne,  Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fish Trap Lake”

Column 2: “67°57'00” N, 132°13'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Rat Lake”

Column 2: “67°25'00” N, 132°18'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Upper Overflow Lake”

Column 2: “67°44'15” N, 132°32'24" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sunny Lake”

Column 2: “67°51'00” N, 132°41'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bruce Lake”

Column 2: “61°49'00” N, 132°05'43" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Caribou Lake”

Column 2: “67°59'00” N, 132°52'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pierre Lake”

Column 2: “67°20'15” N, 132°55'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Puzzle Lake”

Column 2: “67°35'00” N, 133°10'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Beaver Lake”

Column 2: “67°38'00” N, 133°23'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tso Lake”

Column 2: “67°25'00” N, 133°41'29" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bushman Lake”

Column 2: “67°07'30” N, 133°46'38" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS:  Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Atlin Lake”

Column 2: “59°35'00” N, 133°47'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Northern Lake”

Column 2: “61°44'05” N, 133°48'25" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Frog Creek Fount”

Column 2: “67°12'30” N, 133°48'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6..

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bonnetplume Lake”

Column 2: “68°40'30” N, 133°49'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Holmans Lake”

Column 2: “60°20'51” N, 134°20'12" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wolf Lake”

Column 2: “69°13'00” N, 134°27'10" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Old Trout Lake”

Column 2: “69°17'00” N, 135°09'10" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tawät Män”

Column 2: “62°41'09” N, 136°21'24" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Poplar Lake”

Column 2: “61°37'57” N, 137°32'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “McKay Lake”

Column 2: “63°45'27” N, 138°02'29" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kluane Lake”

Column 2: “61°15'39” N, 138°46'22" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Rencontre Lake”

Column 2: “47°41'23” N, 55°12'01" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Haynes Lake”

Column 2: “48°45'25” N, 55°29'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Famine Barasway”

Column 2: “47°06'59” N, 55°36'57" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Diversion Lake”

Column 2: “48°49'02” N, 55°52'30" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Boulder Lake”

Column 2: “48°29'52” N, 56°28'28" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Eastern Lake”

Column 2: “51°13'22” N, 56°39'55" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Grand Lake”

Column 2: “48°54'43” N, 57°30'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Squaw Lake”

Column 2: “48°40'25” N, 57°36'22" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Suzy Lake”

Column 2: “54°06'00” N, 57°46'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tessuialluk Lake”

Column 2: “54°47'08” N, 58°11'21" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Mike Allen, Shelly Glover, Laurie Hawn, LaVar Payne, Kellie Leitch — 6.

At 2:59 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 3:13 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Grandys Lake”

Column 2: “47°51'54” N, 58°44'27" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Barachois”

Column 2: “47°37'38” N, 59°15'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Kahakaukamat”

Column 2: “50°44'32” N, 60°26'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Grand Lake”

Column 2: “53°41'25” N, 60°33'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Warrens Lake”

Column 2: “54°30'19” N, 60°56'31" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Naskaupi Lake”

Column 2: “54°15'47” N, 61°28'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tasialuk Lake”

Column 2: “56°09'53” N, 61°30'28" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Salmon Lake”

Column 2: “54°15'16” N, 61°39'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Seal Lake”

Column 2: “54°20'00” N, 61°40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Upper Dumbell Lake”

Column 2: “82°30'00” N, 62°30'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Saputit Lake”

Column 2: “57°27'45” N, 62°37'46" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lower Dumbell Lake”

Column 2: “82°30'00” N, 62°37'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Uugalik”

Column 2: “67°02'29” N, 62°45'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “St. Peters Lake”

Column 2: “46°25'52” N, 62°46'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pats Camp Lake”

Column 2: “44°48'15” N, 62°48'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Marie Lake”

Column 2: “54°07'26" N,  62°58'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Main Lake”

Column 2: “54°51'41" N,  63°17'48" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Têtu”

Column 2: “50°32'03" N,  63°25'36" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Victoria Lake”

Column 2: “82°35'00" N,  63°05'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Walker Lakes”

Column 2: “59°49'07" N,  64°12'21" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ijjunaituup Tasingit”

Column 2: “66°20'34" N,  64°23'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Témiscouata”

Column 2: “47°41'01" N,  68°51'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Atikonak Lake”

Column 2: “52°40'00" N,  64°32'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Kakwanesetsitish”

Column 2: “50°24'43" N,  64°04'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6..

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qanurlivik Lake”

Column 2: “60°29'46" N,  64°45'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac aux Bleuets”

Column 2: “48°22'46" N,  64°50'28" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Drouard”

Column 2: “51°52'00" N,  64°55'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Naqsarjuaap Tasinga”

Column 2: “66°37'05" N,  64°08'13" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Vezina Lake”

Column 2: “54°47'24" N,  65°12'01" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Windy Lake”

Column 2: “66°30'55" N,  65°27'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pullati”

Column 2: “66°21'33" N,  65°34'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Timmins Lake”

Column 2: “54°02'47" N,  65°36'49" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Churchills Lake”

Column 2: “44°08'37" N,  65°43'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qulittassaisurvik”

Column 2: “66°23'45" N,  65°48'52" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Glacier Lake”

Column 2: “66°41'00" N,  65°05'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Long Lake”

Column 2: “45°29'20" N,  66°14'30" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ashuanipi Lake”

Column 2: “52°45'00" N,  66°14'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5A; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cavers Lake”

Column 2: “54°38'00" N,  66°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Peckford Lake”

Column 2: “54°49'40" N,  66°17'23" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,  Bryan Hayes,  Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Rocky Brook Lake”

Column 2: “46°50'42" N,  66°21'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac aux Outardes”

Column 2: “52°34'58" N,  66°28'12" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Champlain”

Column 2: “45°01'52" N,  73°08'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cunningham Lake”

Column 2: “54°45'43" N,  66°04'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Leila Wynne Lake”

Column 2: “53°05'00" N,  66°46'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Maujean”

Column 2: “55°19'28" N,  66°52'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lorraine Lake”

Column 2: “53°04'00" N,  66°53'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Asquiche”

Column 2: “50°26'58" N,  66°53'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Heintzelman Lake”

Column 2: “81°42'00" N,  66°56'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,  Bryan Hayes,  Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “White Lake”

Column 2: “52°59'58" N,  66°57'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nip Lake”

Column 2: “52°50'00" N,  67°10'29" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac à Eustache”

Column 2: “50°09'23" N,  67°12'43" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Solingue”

Column 2: “50°55'30" N,  67°14'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Premier Lac”

Column 2: “49°27'56" N,  67°20'13" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Boulianne”

Column 2: “49°40'30" N,  67°23'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Hélène”

Column 2: “49°27'57" N,  67°24'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Grèbe”

Column 2: “49°25'29" N,  67°26'12" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Bergnac”

Column 2: “50°44'11" N,  67°03'42" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Gambeau”

Column 2: “50°13'26" N,  67°32'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Pohénégamook”

Column 2: “47°29'17" N,  69°16'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lacs de la Réserve de Bois de Chauffage”

Column 2: “49°21'59" N,  67°37'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Teiche”

Column 2: “50°24'21" N,  67°37'57" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Wolf”

Column 2: “49°24'24" N,  67°41'46" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Oiatalik Lake”

Column 2: “69°16'00" N,  67°42'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Natwayasu”

Column 2: “56°52'47" N,  67°46'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac des Cyprès”

Column 2: “49°44'12" N,  67°59'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Siliac”

Column 2: “52°13'04" N,  68°24'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kilbourne Lake”

Column 2: “81°52'00" N,  68°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac McCormick”

Column 2: “49°33'18" N,  68°03'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Nachicapau”

Column 2: “56°38'33" N,  68°04'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de la 303”

Column 2: “49°34'52" N,  68°04'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Petit lac Touladi”

Column 2: “47°47'26" N,  68°45'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de la Musaraigne”

Column 2: “50°46'01" N,  68°07'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Longspur Lake”

Column 2: “69°47'00" N,  69°12'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Forder Lake”

Column 2: “63°32'00" N,  69°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de la Grosse Truite”

Column 2: “48°37'07" N,  69°17'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sylvia Grinnell Lake”

Column 2: “64°10'00" N,  69°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Charley”

Column 2: “49°10'46" N,  69°26'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Alfred”

Column 2: “49°57'23" N,  69°27'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Ford”

Column 2: “49°09'50" N,  69°28'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Murray Lake”

Column 2: “81°20'00" N,  69°34'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Carné”

Column 2: “49°34'16" N,  69°36'36" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS:  Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Fantôme”

Column 2: “48°26'43" N,  69°38'50" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Bouchard”

Column 2: “48°36'22" N,  69°42'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Petit lac Tibia”

Column 2: “49°03'28" N,  69°43'01" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac aux Feuilles”

Column 2: “58°47'58" N,  69°49'49" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Anakudluk Lake”

Column 2: “64°06'00" N,  69°05'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Sabot”

Column 2: “49°06'11" N,  69°52'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Vingt-Quatre”

Column 2: “48°29'40" N,  69°59'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qamanaaluk”

Column 2: “62°57'59" N,  69°06'46" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qikiqtalik”

Column 2: “62°53'01" N,  69°07'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Ovibon”

Column 2: “48°54'21" N,  69°09'31" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac au Sable”

Column 2: “47°56'32" N,  70°15'24" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Sol”

Column 2: “49°25'51" N,  70°16'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Moussière”

Column 2: “46°49'09" N,  70°16'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Tasikutaaq Sanirarsinga”

Column 2: “60°06'23" N,  70°16'37" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nettilling Lake”

Column 2: “66°29'00" N,  70°20'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de la Gironde”

Column 2: “47°55'35" N,  70°21'30" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de la Biche”

Column 2: “48°31'19" N,  70°22'49" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Noir”

Column 2: “47°54'01" N,  70°24'48" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Savane”

Column 2: “48°43'32" N,  70°26'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Laflamme”

Column 2: “46°48'31" N,  70°29'52" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Allen”

Column 2: “48°10'21" N,  70°32'49" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Pont de Fer”

Column 2: “48°16'32" N,  70°32'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Plat”

Column 2: “47°59'43" N,  70°37'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Long”

Column 2: “48°05'37" N,  70°43'29" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Manouane”

Column 2: “50°42'18" N,  70°44'57" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Carolyn Lake”

Column 2: “81°17'00" N,  70°44'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Antonio”

Column 2: “49°34'08" N,  70°53'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Paul”

Column 2: “49°06'37" N,  70°54'11" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Minakan”

Column 2: “49°11'35" N,  70°55'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tasialuk”

Column 2: “70°25'33" N,  70°07'01" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Escarpé”

Column 2: “48°07'09" N,  70°08'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac aux Visons”

Column 2: “48°26'51" N,  70°09'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lake Hazen”

Column 2: “81°47'50" N,  71°01'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Heart Lake”

Column 2: “75°31'00" N,  100°02'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac des Deux Bucks”

Column 2: “48°52'52" N, 71°11'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Porter”

Column 2: “47°28'31" N, 71°12'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Pic”

Column 2: “48°56'30" N, 71°14'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Dan Harris, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Fradette”

Column 2: “47°31'51" N, 71°02'23" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Petit lac du Bottier”

Column 2: “47°36'19” N, 71°02'54" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de la Manne”

Column 2: “49°17'33" N, 71°22'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Lakas”

Column 2: “47°30'41" N, 71°23'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Grand lac à Foin”

Column 2: “48°14'25" N, 71°03'31" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Pilotis”

Column 2: “48°15'47" N, 71°34'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Mirador Brûlé”

Column 2: “49°35'51" N, 71°38'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Barra”

Column 2: “47°22'13" N, 71°39'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Rond”

Column 2: “50°27'50" N, 71°42'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Calme”

Column 2: “50°27'40" N, 71°45'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Cidelosse”

Column 2: “47°29'53" N, 71°46'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac McCormick”

Column 2: “47°25'45" N, 71°47'44" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Glun”

Column 2: “48°05'16" N, 71°49'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Nessa”

Column 2: “47°16'15" N, 71°53'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Bonhomme”

Column 2: “47°09'24" N, 71°08'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Amadjuak Lake”

Column 2: “64°55'00" N, 71°08'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Silly”

Column 2: “47°29'43" N, 72°10'01" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Petit lac Boisvert”

Column 2: “49°09'54" N, 72°12'11" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Centurion”

Column 2: “49°03'31" N, 72°12'23" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de la Remise”

Column 2: “49°30'31" N, 72°22'13" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Louisette”

Column 2: “50°05'44" N, 72°26'15" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Lanctôt”

Column 2: “47°13'28" N, 72°28'31" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Alfred”

Column 2: “47°32'50" N, 72°30'52" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac à la Crécelle”

Column 2: “47°26'31" N, 72°33'38" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Saint-Michel”

Column 2: “46°24'28" N, 72°41'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Weasel Lake”

Column 2: “81°50'00" N, 72°44'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Padirac”

Column 2: “48°46'39" N, 72°49'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Bienville”

Column 2: “55°04'45" N, 72°51'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac à l'Ours”

Column 2: “48°06'49" N, 72°56'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Troisième lac du Cordon”

Column 2: “46°31'32" N, 73°01'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Rongeur”

Column 2: “47°30'19" N, 73°10'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Roger”

Column 2: “48°09'06" N, 73°15'27" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Travers”

Column 2: “49°26'21" N, 73°16'49" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 4; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Canistre”

Column 2: “46°32'40" N, 73°20'54" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Fiston”

Column 2: “48°31'32" N, 73°21'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Acis”

Column 2: “49°38'48" N, 73°30'47" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Catignan”

Column 2: “49°36'28" N, 73°30'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Portage”

Column 2: “48°42'25" N, 73°32'28" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Denis”

Column 2: “47°58'18" N, 73°33'51" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Sinotte”

Column 2: “46°57'08" N, 73°35'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Colombe”

Column 2: “47°25'48" N, 73°35'47" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Mistassini”

Column 2: “51°00'07" N, 73°37'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Bourgeois”

Column 2: “49°02'55" N, 73°39'33" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Cyprès”

Column 2: “47°19'58" N, 73°40'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Bleu”

Column 2: “46°12'32" N, 73°43'17" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lacs des Loups Marins”

Column 2: “56°30'31" N, 73°44'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Rancy”

Column 2: “46°27'25" N, 73°49'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division:  Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Chiron”

Column 2: “49°30'24" N, 73°53'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Augias”

Column 2: “49°42'50" N, 73°53'30" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Jacques”

Column 2: “46°11'59" N, 73°56'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Verne”

Column 2: “48°07'18" N, 73°56'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Bourgeois”

Column 2: “46°11'59" N, 73°56'50" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Ola”

Column 2: “48°54'54" N, 73°58'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Malone”

Column 2: “45°57'51" N, 73°58'48" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Normand”

Column 2: “46°11'14" N, 73°58'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Payne”

Column 2: “59°27'11" N, 73°59'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Albanel”

Column 2: “51°02'28" N, 73°06'30" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Premier lac en Famille”

Column 2: “47°23'16" N, 73°09'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Abos”

Column 2: “48°58'00" N, 74°01'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tikirajujuk Lake”

Column 2: “64°55'00" N, 74°13'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Magin”

Column 2: “53°33'51" N, 74°14'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Flint Lake”

Column 2: “69°16'00" N, 74°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Madère”

Column 2: “49°17'27" N, 74°16'28" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Keeka Lake”

Column 2: “65°05'00" N, 74°20'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Inlet”

Column 2: “49°42'14" N, 74°21'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Thérien”

Column 2: “46°01'31" N, 74°22'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Capri”

Column 2: “45°54'09" N, 74°22'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes,Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Harry”

Column 2: “49°12'38" N, 74°24'23" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac à l'Eau Claire”

Column 2: “56°06'43" N, 74°26'01" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Maurice-Thiffault”

Column 2: “47°55'25" N, 74°36'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de la Coquille”

Column 2: “49°31'36" N, 74°04'29" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Abeille”

Column 2: “47°05'58" N, 74°42'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Lauzon”

Column 2: “46°09'38" N, 74°44'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Francoeur”

Column 2: “48°13'27" N, 74°46'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Grain de Blé”

Column 2: “46°57'15" N, 74°46'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Vert”

Column 2: “47°37'48" N, 74°46'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Gaétane”

Column 2: “46°39'52" N, 74°49'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Baillairgé”

Column 2: “46°19'49" N, 74°49'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Piling Lake”

Column 2: “69°03'00" N, 74°49'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac aux Moustiques”

Column 2: “46°43'23" N, 74°05'22" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Passage”

Column 2: “46°11'21" N, 74°50'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Profond”

Column 2: “47°00'11" N, 74°56'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Robert”

Column 2: “45°47'45" N, 74°08'25" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Violon”

Column 2: “46°13'29" N, 74°09'44" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Minto”

Column 2: “57°13'07" N, 75°00'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Faucon”

Column 2: “46°59'17" N, 75°01'22" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de la Rampe”

Column 2: “46°16'27" N, 75°12'36" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Liancourt”

Column 2: “55°00'47" N, 75°14'13" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Moqueur”

Column 2: “45°54'03" N, 75°20'54" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Uchikwachikanan”

Column 2: “54°08'05" N, 75°21'30" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Échoam”

Column 2: “46°00'11" N, 75°23'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Angmaluk Lake”

Column 2: “64°59'00" N, 75°24'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Petit lac Puant”

Column 2: “46°17'38" N, 75°25'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Kapimichikamach”

Column 2: “55°10'08" N, 75°25'29" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Réau”

Column 2: “46°12'39" N, 75°27'57" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron,  Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,  Bryan Hayes,  Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de la Perchaude”

Column 2: “46°02'43" N, 75°33'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Wells”

Column 2: “45°59'00" N, 75°34'24" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Kearney”

Column 2: “48°01'43” N, 75°35'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Courchesne”

Column 2: “46°34'05” N, 75°39'56" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Brassard”

Column 2: “45°53'16” N, 75°43'33" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Aufeis Lake”

Column 2: “69°20'00” N, 75°44'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Lamb”

Column 2: “47°57'19” N, 75°45'33" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Sansoucy”

Column 2: “47°29'30” N, 75°49'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Jutras”

Column 2: “48°12'51” N, 75°50'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Rond”

Column 2: “45°41'14” N, 75°50'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Rollrock Lake”

Column 2: “81°34'00” N, 75°55'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pedro Lake”

Column 2: “69°25'00” N, 75°08'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Hérisson”

Column 2: “47°49'04” N, 76°00'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after 

item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Paal”

Column 2: “46°51'17” N, 76°01'31" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Gilbert”

Column 2: “47°21'19” N, 76°11'22" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Vitré”

Column 2: “46°36'14” N, 76°12'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Visionnaire”

Column 2: “46°23'39” N, 76°13'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Idéal”

Column 2: “47°04'30” N, 76°14'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de l'Aile”

Column 2: “48°54'15” N, 76°27'28" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Raycroft Lake”

Column 2: “45°13'07” N, 76°30'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Murray Lake”

Column 2: “45°09'59” N, 76°30'47" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Fayolle”

Column 2: “47°43'56” N, 76°32'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Vespéral”

Column 2: “46°40'47” N, 76°37'52" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Warne”

Column 2: “46°56'54” N, 76°39'23" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cranberry Creek Lake”

Column 2: “44°59'39” N, 76°40'37" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Giblas”

Column 2: “47°14'55” N, 76°40'47" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “La France Lake”

Column 2: “45°05'22” N, 76°40'52" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Xousse”

Column 2: “46°57'33” N, 76°43'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Clear Lake”

Column 2: “44°35'29” N, 76°46'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Daniel”

Column 2: “46°19'24” N, 76°48'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Payes Lake”

Column 2: “44°58'23” N, 76°50'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen,Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “West Quinn Lake”

Column 2: “45°05'30” N, 76°54'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lacs du Castor”

Column 2: “46°33'51” N, 76°54'42" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Russell Lake”

Column 2: “45°08'18” N, 76°54'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Tamier”

Column 2: “47°05'52” N, 76°56'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Grindstone Lake”

Column 2: “45°00'50” N, 76°57'11" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Majuqsiivik”

Column 2: “71°40'04” N, 76°57'43" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Evans”

Column 2: “50°54'13” N, 76°57'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac McAuley”

Column 2: “45°58'35” N, 76°07'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Chavy”

Column 2: “46°47'00” N, 76°08'23" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac à Crête”

Column 2: “46°01'18” N, 76°08'36" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de l'Agate”

Column 2: “47°49'09” N, 76°08'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Blanc”

Column 2: “46°24'03” N, 77°14'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Rancio”

Column 2: “47°11'57” N, 77°16'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Paul Calandra, Shelly Glover, Robert Goguen, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James — 6.

At 4:43 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 4:58 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “McLaughlin Lake”

Column 2: “45°16'26” N, 77°19'01" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Rahm Lake”

Column 2: “45°03'57” N, 77°19'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Blue Lake”

Column 2: “44°53'26” N, 77°02'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Jomino”

Column 2: “47°10'45” N, 77°21'46" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Dérome”

Column 2: “47°10'14” N, 77°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Coupal”

Column 2: “46°57'10” N, 77°29'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Stewart Lake”

Column 2: “45°09'23” N, 77°29'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Cranberry Lake”

Column 2: “45°43'52” N, 77°31'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Turquoise Lake”

Column 2: “45°48'42” N, 77°35'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Currie Lake”

Column 2: “44°58'25” N, 77°36'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Calhoun”

Column 2: “46°55'13” N, 77°36'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Desrousseaux”

Column 2: “46°26'01” N, 77°39'10" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Kâmackawâkâmagak”

Column 2: “47°56'50” N, 77°39'11" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Tabès”

Column 2: “47°04'55” N, 77°42'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Thomson Lake”

Column 2: “44°37'00” N, 77°44'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Francoeur”

Column 2: “46°17'00” N, 77°05'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on division.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qiuttiivik”

Column 2: “71°46'33” N, 77°50'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac de l'Autruche”

Column 2: “46°22'18” N, 77°54'46" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Edward”

Column 2: “46°26'20” N, 77°56'29" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Tremblay”

Column 2: “47°08'11” N, 77°57'37" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac du Colibri”

Column 2: “46°40'40” N, 78°01'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Upper Monmouth Lake”

Column 2: “44°55'55” N, 78°12'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tattler Lake”

Column 2: “45°39'20” N, 78°13'56" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Whitney Lake”

Column 2: “45°34'31” N, 78°16'56" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “South Boot Lake”

Column 2: “45°13'11” N, 78°17'50" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac à l'Eau Bleue”

Column 2: “46°48'35” N, 78°02'33" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pondweed Lake”

Column 2: “45°27'36” N, 78°27'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Second Twin Pond”

Column 2: “46°10'27” N, 78°29'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Paul”

Column 2: “46°29'43” N, 78°30'12" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Maiden Lake”

Column 2: “45°35'01” N, 78°41'54" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bear Lake”

Column 2: “45°20'29” N, 78°42'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Kamaschakwakamach”

Column 2: “54°49'17” N, 78°42'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Scott Lake”

Column 2: “45°29'10” N, 78°43'21" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Kibisakatciwi”

Column 2: “48°58'02” N, 78°44'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Osler Lake”

Column 2: “45°57'14” N, 78°45'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “St. Nora Lake”

Column 2: “45°09'21” N, 78°49'47" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Meach Lakes”

Column 2: “45°17'59” N, 78°07'52" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mallard Lake”

Column 2: “45°34'47” N, 78°08'21" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Maloney Lake”

Column 2: “47°16'28” N, 79°29'10" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bass Lake”

Column 2: “44°36'12” N, 79°30'24" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Burnside Lake”

Column 2: “45°24'42” N, 79°30'51" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Garneau Lake”

Column 2: “49°42'30” N, 79°33'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lower Detour Lake”

Column 2: “49°56'28” N, 79°37'17" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bruce Lake”

Column 2: “45°11'10” N, 79°38'38" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Green Lake”

Column 2: “47°23'13” N, 79°42'48" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “McDonald Lake”

Column 2: “44°55'44” N, 79°46'42" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Finlayson Lake”

Column 2: “46°41'32” N, 79°48'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Orr Lake”

Column 2: “44°36'30” N, 79°48'11" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Silver Lake”

Column 2: “45°13'39” N, 79°48'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Abitibi”

Column 2: “48°39'29” N, 79°50'41" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Belle Isle Lake”

Column 2: “47°28'13” N, 79°56'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tasse Lake”

Column 2: “47°05'17” N, 79°58'21" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bevan Lake”

Column 2: “50°11'31” N, 79°58'31" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Doig Lake”

Column 2: “48°11'07” N, 79°59'25" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Mountain Lake”

Column 2: “46°29'38” N, 79°06'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Felst Lake”

Column 2: “50°53'30” N, 80°10'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hybrid Lake”

Column 2: “46°52'33” N, 80°15'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Swan Lake”

Column 2: “48°14'21” N, 80°16'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Knight Lake”

Column 2: “48°12'48" N,  80°21'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wright Lake”

Column 2: “49°02'12" N,  80°25'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mallard Lake”

Column 2: “45°31'17" N,  80°25'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Burgess Lake”

Column 2: “47°39'57" N,  80°29'10" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Toad Lake”

Column 2: “45°53'43" N,  80°03'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Colin Scott Lake”

Column 2: “46°49'51" N,  80°30'11" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hilda Lake”

Column 2: “47°45'12" N,  80°30'43" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Anderson Lake”

Column 2: “48°32'07" N,  80°36'51" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Moccasin Lake”

Column 2: “47°28'41" N,  80°04'11" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Daoust Lake”

Column 2: “46°07'04" N,  80°41'38" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Erichsen Lake”

Column 2: “70°40'00" N,  80°41'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Bonhomme Lake”

Column 2: “46°49'04" N,  80°42'13" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Coutts Lake”

Column 2: “48°16'07" N,  80°44'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “The Sluiceway”

Column 2: “46°53'42" N,  80°45'30" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ghoul Lake”

Column 2: “47°10'56" N,  80°47'21" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tobermory Lake”

Column 2: “44°15'20" N,  80°49'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Headquarters Lake”

Column 2: “46°33'18" N,  80°51'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Boat Lake”

Column 2: “44°43'33" N,  81°13'37" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nemag Lake”

Column 2: “46°22'07" N,  81°14'12" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: CONTRE : Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Thorbass Lake”

Column 2: “47°06'42" N,  81°15'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: CONTRE : Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lue Lake”

Column 2: “47°07'59" N,  81°17'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kidney Lake”

Column 2: “49°14'31" N,  81°18'36" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ola Lake”

Column 2: “47°33'09" N,  81°21'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pike Lake”

Column 2: “46°40'22" N,  81°22'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “West Cameron Lake”

Column 2: “46°29'49" N,  81°33'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Upper Donnegana Lake”

Column 2: “47°19'06" N,  81°37'25" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Amittuarjuk Lake”

Column 2: “67°17'00" N,  81°38'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pembroke Lake”

Column 2: “47°31'54" N,  81°39'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Quartzite Lake”

Column 2: “67°10'00" N,  81°40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bittern Lake”

Column 2: “46°54'56" N,  81°41'21" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mindedo Lake”

Column 2: “47°57'13" N,  81°49'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Letson Lake”

Column 2: “47°19'44" N,  81°05'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pump Lake”

Column 2: “46°30'28" N,  81°05'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Maumi Lakes”

Column 2: “63°56'55" N,  81°05'50" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Maltese Lake”

Column 2: “46°49'44" N,  81°51'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “First Lake”

Column 2: “47°09'33" N,  81°51'47" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sucker Lake”

Column 2: “45°43'18" N,  81°52'21" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Eastman Lake”

Column 2: “48°13'54" N,  81°55'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Weston Lake”

Column 2: “48°14'57" N,  81°56'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kingulik”

Column 2: “69°26'05" N,  81°59'24" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hall Lake”

Column 2: “68°41'00" N,  82°17'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Alexander Lake”

Column 2: “46°35'14" N,  82°32'37" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bragh Lake”

Column 2: “47°19'17" N,  82°36'44" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Zadi Lake”

Column 2: “49°42'06" N,  82°40'42" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Saylors Lake”

Column 2: “47°39'10" N,  83°12'38" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Asta Lake”

Column 2: “70°21'00" N,  83°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hambone Lake”

Column 2: “48°06'24" N,  83°20'21" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ridge Lake”

Column 2: “50°27'36" N,  83°24'27" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Prairie Grass Lake”

Column 2: “47°16'03" N,  83°26'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Conacher Lake”

Column 2: “46°40'04" N,  83°29'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fireline Lake”

Column 2: “48°20'44" N,  83°34'42" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nagvaak Lake”

Column 2: “67°33'00" N,  83°39'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fra Lake”

Column 2: “48°14'35" N,  83°40'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Giguere Lake”

Column 2: “46°36'25" N,  83°40'46" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Padre Lake”

Column 2: “48°13'50" N,  83°42'24" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hanlan Lake”

Column 2: “49°49'50" N,  83°47'48" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tasiruluk Lake”

Column 2: “67°24'00" N,  83°56'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Upper Dingman Lake”

Column 2: “48°11'12" N,  84°15'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Snowgoose Lake”

Column 2: “75°38'00" N,  84°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Finger Lake”

Column 2: “48°10'41" N,  84°36'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bark Lake”

Column 2: “47°34'22" N,  84°36'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Fleming Lake”

Column 2: “72°29'00" N,  84°36'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Phalarope Lake”

Column 2: “75°39'00" N,  84°36'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lower Medhurst Lake”

Column 2: “48°25'10" N,  84°43'25" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pashoskoota Lake”

Column 2: “48°15'04" N,  84°46'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Otter Lake”

Column 2: “48°01'28" N,  84°46'36" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tabassa Lake”

Column 2: “48°58'01" N,  84°48'52" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Roller Lake”

Column 2: “47°54'30" N,  84°49'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bone Lake”

Column 2: “49°02'19" N,  84°49'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mank Lake”

Column 2: “47°40'59" N,  84°05'41" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Martin Lake”

Column 2: “47°09'42" N,  84°06'12" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Marcil Lake”

Column 2: “72°59'00" N,  85°00'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Piringajuq Lake”

Column 2: “66°44'00" N,  85°10'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Silaliarutak Lake”

Column 2: “66°47'00" N,  85°10'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “One Island Lake”

Column 2: “48°26'10" N,  85°29'39" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “McCulley Lake”

Column 2: “50°34'26" N,  85°40'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Peter Julian, José Nunez-Melo, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Bryan Hayes, Roxanne James, Randy Kamp, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis — 6.

At 5:47 p.m., the sitting was suspended.

At 6:10 p.m., the sitting resumed.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Batise Lake”

Column 2: “49°46'41" N,  85°42'38" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Romulus Lake”

Column 2: “79°52'00" N,  85°05'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Arms Lake”

Column 2: “49°33'10" N,  86°01'33" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Titittiaqtalik Lake”

Column 2: “66°34'00" N,  86°16'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bodkin Lake”

Column 2: “50°29'09" N,  86°22'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Dusk Lake”

Column 2: “50°10'37" N,  86°22'38" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cyril Lake”

Column 2: “50°02'42" N,  86°27'03" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ukiaqsiiviarjuk Lake”

Column 2: “66°33'00" N,  86°28'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Amittutjuaq Lake”

Column 2: “66°37'00" N,  86°28'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tumi Lake”

Column 2: “66°49'00" N,  86°28'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Slade Lake”

Column 2: “52°02'47" N,  86°30'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Aniguqliq Lake”

Column 2: “66°43'00" N,  86°32'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Stewart Lake”

Column 2: “49°17'33" N,  86°43'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Poulin Lake”

Column 2: “48°50'30" N,  86°57'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Duck Lake”

Column 2: “48°59'49" N,  87°19'49" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Runham Lake”

Column 2: “50°59'23" N,  87°25'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Calamity Lake”

Column 2: “51°42'12" N,  87°28'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Diversion Lake”

Column 2: “49°04'52" N,  87°03'51" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Upper Pays Plat Lake”

Column 2: “49°05'53" N,  87°32'17" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Dorsey Lake”

Column 2: “50°17'59" N,  87°35'29" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Miles Lake”

Column 2: “67°02'00" N,  87°37'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Meen Lake”

Column 2: “64°58'00" N,  87°40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Spree Lake”

Column 2: “50°14'38" N,  87°46'21" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Boobus Lake”

Column 2: “49°28'14" N,  87°09'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pain Lake”

Column 2: “49°26'02" N,  88°01'12" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Chappais Lake”

Column 2: “50°26'42" N,  88°22'38" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lonely Lake”

Column 2: “49°40'07" N,  88°57'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Naujaalik Lake”

Column 2: “68°03'45" N,  88°60'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lassie Lake”

Column 2: “48°43'28" N,  89°10'25" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Alliarusia Lake”

Column 2: “68°32'00" N,  89°19'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tamarack Lake”

Column 2: “50°20'07" N,  89°23'22" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Burk Lake”

Column 2: “48°39'33" N,  89°26'23" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Livermore Lake”

Column 2: “48°54'01" N,  89°27'41" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Atanirsliq Lake”

Column 2: “68°26'55" N,  89°49'50" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Turn Lake”

Column 2: “48°26'03" N,  89°50'43" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Gillard Lake”

Column 2: “49°40'18" N,  89°58'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Chappelle Lake”

Column 2: “50°10'49" N,  89°59'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Amaartok Lake”

Column 2: “68°14'35" N,  89°08'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Imiq Lake”

Column 2: “68°18'25" N,  90°01'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Forsberg Lake”

Column 2: “56°23'43" N,  90°12'22" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Shinagmabin Lake”

Column 2: “51°42'39" N,  90°15'50" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pug Lake”

Column 2: “49°16'57" N,  90°18'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Inwood Lake”

Column 2: “49°01'11" N,  90°26'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Clovenhoof Lake”

Column 2: “48°29'08" N,  90°28'37" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Titmarsh Lake”

Column 2: “48°21'19" N,  90°31'48" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Buda Lake”

Column 2: “48°19'28" N,  90°35'23" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mission Lake”

Column 2: “63°20'45" N,  90°41'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Oscar Lake”

Column 2: “49°17'43" N,  90°41'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tahirarjuaq Lake”

Column 2: “68°34'15" N,  90°42'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wolf Lake”

Column 2: “50°11'37" N,  90°45'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mud Lake”

Column 2: “48°18'02" N,  90°50'57" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hodgson Lake”

Column 2: “52°52'36" N,  90°52'36" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Taqaugaq Lake”

Column 2: “69°15'20" N,  90°53'05" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kecheokagan Lake”

Column 2: “52°11'08" N,  90°54'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Roxanne James, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Coull Lake”

Column 2: “52°01'06" N,  90°59'10" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Gault Lake”

Column 2: “50°23'35" N,  90°07'48" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kee Lake”

Column 2: “50°17'05" N,  91°12'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lazy Lake”

Column 2: “49°05'45" N,  91°14'30" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bird Lake”

Column 2: “48°19'03" N,  91°15'33" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kuutsinaaq Lake”

Column 2: “68°31'45" N,  91°17'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Uluujaq Lake”

Column 2: “69°38'20" N,  91°21'55" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Amiksangiq Lake”

Column 2: “69°23'10" N,  91°27'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Marcelle Lake”

Column 2: “49°44'41" N,  91°03'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nest Lake”

Column 2: “48°08'53" N,  91°33'01" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Manaqturvik Lake”

Column 2: “69°28'15" N,  91°35'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Allan Lake”

Column 2: “48°24'13" N,  91°35'33" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Moxness Lake”

Column 2: “48°27'12" N,  91°35'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Folkard Lake”

Column 2: “50°31'22" N,  91°39'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pisky Lake”

Column 2: “49°10'20" N,  91°04'22" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Jackfish Lake”

Column 2: “49°06'52" N,  91°50'13" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Burwash Lake”

Column 2: “68°50'00" N,  91°53'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Milk Lake”

Column 2: “48°45'47" N,  91°55'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Upper Leach Lake”

Column 2: “49°07'27" N,  91°06'55" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Notley Lake”

Column 2: “52°18'29" N,  92°15'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kastner Lake”

Column 2: “50°36'17" N,  92°22'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cavano Lake”

Column 2: “51°13'51" N,  92°24'11" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “McKenna Lake”

Column 2: “50°30'57" N,  92°27'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Seul”

Column 2: “50°19'30" N,  92°29'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lady Melville Lake”

Column 2: “69°08'00" N,  92°30'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Machum Lake”

Column 2: “63°16'00" N,  92°36'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Turtle Lake”

Column 2: “48°47'28" N,  92°41'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Anaway Lake”

Column 2: “49°57'00" N,  92°44'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Butts Lake”

Column 2: “63°43'00" N,  92°44'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Uqsulik Lakes”

Column 2: “69°50'10" N,  92°55'10" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Atikamaykus Lake”

Column 2: “54°48'27" N,  92°55'36" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ptarmigan Lake”

Column 2: “76°23'00" N,  92°56'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Gibson Lake”

Column 2: “63°30'00" N,  93°12'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Waweyahao Lake”

Column 2: “55°46'11" N,  93°13'28" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sandy Lake”

Column 2: “53°01'09" N,  93°02'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Amitsuarjuk Lake”

Column 2: “69°27'10" N,  93°20'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Amitjok Lake”

Column 2: “68°56'25" N,  93°21'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sakwesew Lake”

Column 2: “55°25'06" N,  93°29'06" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hagen Lake”

Column 2: “50°00'09" N,  93°34'15" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sanagak Lake”

Column 2: “70°15'00" N,  93°35'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Jekyll Lake”

Column 2: “69°45'00" N,  93°40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Trout Lake”

Column 2: “49°09'07" N,  93°44'54" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Redfish Lake”

Column 2: “69°32'00" N,  93°45'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Rail Lake”

Column 2: “49°49'42" N,  93°52'56" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pearl Lake”

Column 2: “49°52'05" N,  93°55'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Eleanor Lake”

Column 2: “75°23'00" N,  93°58'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Munro Lake”

Column 2: “62°23'00" N,  94°11'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Beaver Lake”

Column 2: “49°47'18" N,  94°12'55" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Gods Lake”

Column 2: “54°40'26" N,  94°14'48" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kate Austin Lake”

Column 2: “74°41'00" N,  94°17'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hammerhetas Lake”

Column 2: “49°26'36" N,  94°18'02" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Southern Lake”

Column 2: “62°13'00" N,  94°20'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Banks Lake”

Column 2: “63°08'00" N,  94°28'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Carlbom Lake”

Column 2: “50°31'00" N,  94°31'20" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Quartzite Lake”

Column 2: “62°22'00" N,  94°32'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Andrews Lake”

Column 2: “63°53'00" N,  94°35'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Trout Lake”

Column 2: “49°48'43" N,  94°47'55" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ruins Lake”

Column 2: “74°41'00" N,  94°55'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Blakely Lake”

Column 2: “63°18'00" N,  94°56'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Strip Lake”

Column 2: “74°43'00" N,  94°58'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Teardrop Lake”

Column 2: “74°41'00" N,  94°59'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kaminak Lake”

Column 2: “62°10'00" N,  95°00'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bear Lake”

Column 2: “53°03'13" N,  95°01'56" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kaokasaseekaki Lake”

Column 2: “52°30'29" N,  95°10'54" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Maguse Lake”

Column 2: “61°37'00" N,  95°10'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Starr Lake”

Column 2: “50°28'11" N,  95°13'35" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Stamm Lake”

Column 2: “50°35'13" N,  95°16'09" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hyde Lake”

Column 2: “60°36'00" N,  95°17'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bélanger Lake”

Column 2: “49°46'19" N,  95°19'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Martell Lake”

Column 2: “63°52'00" N,  95°21'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Scout Lake”

Column 2: “51°24'42” N, 95°22'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kinsley Lake”

Column 2: “50°32'49” N, 95°25'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Napajut Lake”

Column 2: “61°11'00” N, 95°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tullibee Lake”

Column 2: “53°52'01” N, 95°27'30" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Carberry Lake”

Column 2: “50°07'35” N, 95°31'23" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Victory Lake”

Column 2: “62°36'00” N, 95°31'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Harris Lake”

Column 2: “55°53'08” N, 95°32'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Black River Lake”

Column 2: “50°44'34” N, 95°33'47" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Upper Maguse Lake”

Column 2: “61°48'00” N, 95°34'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Oxford Lake”

Column 2: “54°50'57” N, 95°37'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tehek Lake”

Column 2: “64°55'00” N, 95°38'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sasaginnigak Lake”

Column 2: “51°35'36” N, 95°40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ranger Seal Lake”

Column 2: “66°22'00” N, 95°43'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qamanirjuaq Lake”

Column 2: “62°57'00” N, 95°46'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Barren Lake”

Column 2: “74°48'40” N, 95°05'30" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Probe Lake”

Column 2: “71°31'00” N, 95°05'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Maseenapeekeenekin Lake”

Column 2: “53°48'58” N, 95°50'16" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Waweyasew Lake”

Column 2: “56°29'03” N, 95°52'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Spi Lake”

Column 2: “62°03'00” N, 95°52'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Leonard Neufeld Lake”

Column 2: “54°32'45” N, 95°08'48" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Yeo Lake”

Column 2: “53°03'50” N, 96°00'49" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Koka Lake”

Column 2: “68°31'00” N, 96°15'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tupik Lake”

Column 2: “64°20'10” N, 96°16'25" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mooney Lake”

Column 2: “57°53'11” N, 96°22'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wasahowakow Lake”

Column 2: “53°27'25” N, 96°23'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Gronbeck Lake”

Column 2: “59°46'35” N, 96°28'53" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Stubner Lake”

Column 2: “59°16'10” N, 96°03'52" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Harling Lake”

Column 2: “61°41'00” N, 96°32'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pitz Lake”

Column 2: “63°57'00” N, 96°32'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qikittalik Lake”

Column 2: “64°25'00” N, 96°39'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Ayaktuukvik Lake”

Column 2: “64°33'00” N, 96°40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Molson Lake”

Column 2: “54°12'04” N, 96°45'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Amitsoq Lake”

Column 2: “68°56'00” N, 96°47'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Little Deer Lake”

Column 2: “51°32'38” N, 96°48'46" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Trud Lake”

Column 2: “62°14'00” N, 96°05'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kingfisher Lake”

Column 2: “50°00'41” N, 96°52'44" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cecil Nelson Lake”

Column 2: “56°52'19” N, 96°57'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Traer Lake”

Column 2: “58°32'33” N, 96°58'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mowers Lake”

Column 2: “60°13'00” N, 96°08'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lane Lake”

Column 2: “58°56'07” N, 97°10'13" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cook Lake”

Column 2: “55°36'00” N, 97°12'15" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Edmonds Lake”

Column 2: “57°27'45” N, 97°19'23" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Malaher Lake”

Column 2: “60°10'00” N, 97°20'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “South Henik Lake”

Column 2: “61°30'00” N, 97°20'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Norris Lake”

Column 2: “50°27'54” N, 97°23'42" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Okotakunusk Lake”

Column 2: “57°09'01” N, 97°24'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Cross Lake”

Column 2: “54°44'55” N, 97°30'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sadeski Lake”

Column 2: “59°38'32” N, 97°31'31" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pauls Lake”

Column 2: “50°36'38” N, 97°32'54" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sipiwesk Lake”

Column 2: “55°05'18” N, 97°34'31" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Princess Mary Lake”

Column 2: “63°57'00" N,  97°35'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel —; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Age Lake”

Column 2: “55°59'59" N,  97°36'22" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “North Henik Lake”

Column 2: “61°44'00" N,  97°40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tatinnai Lake”

Column 2: “60°55'00" N,  97°41'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “McGorman Lake”

Column 2: “58°24'31" N,  97°42'32" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mystery Lake”

Column 2: “55°50'50" N,  97°43'40" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kekekew Lake”

Column 2: “54°11'17" N,  97°48'50" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Dorward Lake”

Column 2: “59°11'37" N,  97°58'45" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Yathkyed Lake”

Column 2: “62°40'00" N,  97°58'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Birthday Bay”

Column 2: “73°50'00" N,  97°08'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Qamanaarjuk Lake”

Column 2: “64°41'00" N,  98°00'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Playgreen Lake”

Column 2: “54°02'00" N,  98°14'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “George Lake”

Column 2: “49°56'57" N,  98°16'47" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Steepbank Lake”

Column 2: “50°54'16" N,  98°02'08" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nowyak Lake”

Column 2: “61°50'00" N,  98°21'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Mallery Lake”

Column 2: “63°59'00" N,  98°23'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Soab Lake”

Column 2: “55°14'31" N,  98°24'55" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wintonick Lake”

Column 2: “59°49'48" N,  98°25'14" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Southern Indian Lake”

Column 2: “57°10'00" N,  98°29'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Dalpe Lake”

Column 2: “60°26'00" N,  98°38'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lisowicky Lake”

Column 2: “58°05'45" N,  98°40'54" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Hawk Hill Lake”

Column 2: “61°06'00" N,  98°40'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lac Manitoba”

Column 2: “50°59'00" N,  98°48'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Otter Lake”

Column 2: “61°08'00" N,  98°05'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Younger Lake”

Column 2: “59°53'27" N,  98°58'07" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Greenaway Lake”

Column 2: “54°47'15" N,  98°09'38" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Bate Lake”

Column 2: “61°38'00" N,  99°00'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tebesjuak Lake”

Column 2: “63°46'00" N,  99°00'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Aberdeen Lake”

Column 2: “64°30'00" N,  99°00'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Pamiutuq Lake”

Column 2: “63°09'00" N,  99°14'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Menauhswun Lake”

Column 2: “53°31'56" N,  99°16'47" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Farquhar Lake”

Column 2: “59°27'11" N,  99°22'29" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Forsyth Lake”

Column 2: “73°01'00" N,  99°22'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Watterson Lake”

Column 2: “61°14'00" N,  99°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Tulemalu Lake”

Column 2: “62°58'00" N,  99°25'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Wapiyayo Lake”

Column 2: “55°57'23" N,  99°27'26" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Campbell Lake”

Column 2: “50°37'22" N,  99°37'34" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sand Lake”

Column 2: “65°15'00" N,  99°37'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Boland Lake”

Column 2: “61°41'00" N,  99°38'00" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Kameesak Lake”

Column 2: “53°25'19" N,  99°43'25" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “East Eighteen Lake”

Column 2: “50°27'01" N,  99°47'23" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Dauphin Lake”

Column 2: “51°17'00" N,  99°47'04" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Shumyhora Lake”

Column 2: “59°27'17" N,  99°48'36" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Nueltin Lake”

Column 2: “59°59'56" N,  99°49'59" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Sucharov Lake”

Column 2: “58°34'22" N,  99°05'44" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Findlay Lake”

Column 2: “57°26'09" N,  99°50'25" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Lytwyns Lake”

Column 2: “51°35'50" N,  99°50'58" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Stephenson Lake”

Column 2: “57°09'41" N,  99°52'18" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 1 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 100 on page 399 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “101.”

Column 1: “Herblet Lake”

Column 2: “54°55'58" N,  99°54'19" W”

Column 3: “The lake’s water boundary includes the mouths of all connecting waterways”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 2 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 22 on page 400 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “22.1”

Column 1: “Thames River”

Column 2: “42o19'11" N,  82o27'18" W”

Column 3: “43o08'54" N,  80o45'40" W”

Column 4: “From Woodstock to Lake St. Clair”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Part 2 of the Schedule set out in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 29 on page 401 in the columns shown the following:

 

 

 

Item: “29.1”

Column 1: “West Branch of Don River”

Column 2: “43o39'02" N,  79o20'52" W”

Column 3: “43o51'14" N,  79o30'47" W”

Column 4: “From Maple to Lake Ontario”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Schedule 2, be amended by adding after  item 62 on page 403 the following:

 

 

 

“PART 3

OCEAN DRAINAGE BASINS

All navigable waters situated in Canada and included in the Atlantic Ocean drainage basin, the Hudson Bay drainage basin, the Arctic Ocean drainage basin, the Pacific Ocean drainage basin or the Gulf of Mexico drainage basin.”

 

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

SCHEDULE 2 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5.

 

 

 

On Clause 1,

 

 

 

That Bill C-45, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing lines 4 and 5 on page 1 with the following:

 

 

“1. This Act may be cited as the Omnibus Act No.2, 2012.”

 

 

The question was put on the amendment and it was negatived on the following recorded division: YEAS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5; NAYS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6.

 

 

 

Clause 1 carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5.

 

 

 

The Title carried on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5.

 

 

 

The Bill carried  on the following recorded division: YEAS: Mark Adler, Brian Jean, Cathy McLeod, Costas Menegakis, LaVar Payne, Dave Van Kesteren — 6; NAYS: Guy Caron, Raymond Côté, Peggy Nash, Scott Simms, Nycole Turmel — 5.

 

 

 

ORDERED, — That the Chair report the Bill to the House.

 

 

 

At 7:43 p.m. on Friday, November 23, 2012, the Committee adjourned to the call of the Chair.

 

 

 

 

 

Jean-François Lafleur, Suzie Cadieux,
Clerks of the Committee